Helen Andrews at First Things:

A few subsequent comments on the Brunner documentary. There is a lot to say, not only about the dubiousness of the fraudulent self-proclaimed “Nazi hunter” Klarsfeld family. But that should be left out at this point, you can read about it elsewhere. First of all, it is objectionable that the length of the video is due to the fact that the uploader simply “doubled” the same film in succession, which becomes clear halfway through the video.

About the content: The film features two elderly Jewish women, possibly sisters, who claim that as children they were the (so far only) “witnesses” during the deportation to Riga to the fact that Brunner “murdered with a single shot” the richest Austrian at the time, Siegmund Bosel, who was already seriously ill and the last passenger to be brought in on a stretcher. This had happened in the dark of night in front of their closed carriage at the departure station.

Why two Jewish girls knew in the dark that this was the richest Austrian seems implausible. Also that Brunner intended to take this train to Riga himself. We need to know who Bosel actually was: he had brought Austria to the edge of the abyss with his typically Jewish speculations. In other words, he played roughly the same role as the speculative Jew Jakob Goldschmidt in the German banking crisis. Significantly, the Wikipedia article about Goldschmidt makes no reference to this.

https://de.zxc.wiki/wiki/Siegmund_Bosel
https://de.zxc.wiki/wiki/Jakob_Goldschmidt
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_banking_crisis_of_1931

In current reports, Brunner is attributed the nickname “bloodhound”. In reality, as the documentary also states, his subordinate Josef Weiszl was allegedly called this, which is probably just another one of the well-known Jewish revenge horror inventions after the war. https://de.zxc.wiki/wiki/Josef_Weiszl

Then another of these countless Austrian former members of the SS in the Reich Security Main Office, Wilhelm Höttl, appears in the documentary. Interestingly, not only did he go completely unpunished, he even worked as a CIA agent after the war. Höttl had apparently virtually bought his freedom by acting as a witness for the prosecution in the infamous Nuremberg victors’ trial, claiming that Eichmann had “entrusted him with a great Reich secret” at the end of 1944, namely the systematic murder of six million Jews that had already taken place at that time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_H%C3%B6ttl

At the end of the documentary, we see an auction at Christie’s, where all kinds of art objects once appropriated by wealthy Jews and “Aryanized” by the Nazis are auctioned off free of charge for the benefit of Holocaust victims. Often paintings by German painters with naturalistic motifs such as Aryan children’s faces. One of these Jewish survivors then explains: “These works were an expression of the personality of Jewish art collectors, and so the theft was also the expropriation of their personality”, which is a travesty in itself.

Jewish “art” or the expression of their personality should above all be associated with what the Nazis called “degenerate art”, and with which the Jews still bother the world today, because they themselves are not at all capable of what they illegitimately appropriate, because they lack the essence of naturalism and German folk art. For them, what a people created is at best a commercialized object of speculation, i.e. simply important to possess (so that the Germans as its creators do not possess it).

It is significant that Christie’s stopped the auction of the valuable jewelry of the deceased Horten widow not long ago due to pressure from Jewish lobby groups, as if they owned the auction house. The Jews reasoned that the wealth of the Horten family was the result of the expropriation of the Jews. However, it is also known that almost all of the family’s department stores were destroyed by Jewish bombing during the war, for which there was never any compensation.