BBC staffers reveal editor’s ‘entire job’ to whitewash Jewish war crimes
Hasbara perpetrated by Jews in positions of power throughout the West
From VT Foreign Policy:
BBC editor Raffi Berg has almost complete control of the British broadcaster’s online coverage of Israel’s war on Gaza and is ensuring that all events are reported with a pro-Israel bias, according to a new report published on 28 December by Drop Site News.
“This guy’s entire job is to water down everything that’s too critical of Israel,” one former BBC journalist said.
Drop Site News spoke to 13 current and former staffers who stated that the BBC’s coverage consistently devalues Palestinian life, ignores Israeli atrocities, and creates a false equivalence in an entirely unbalanced conflict.
Another BBC journalist said Berg plays a key role in a broader BBC culture of “systematic Israeli propaganda.”
“How much power he has is wild,” said another journalist.
“There was an extreme fear at the BBC, that if you ever wanted to do anything about Israel or Palestine, editors would say: ‘If you want to pitch something, you have to go through Raffi and get his signoff,” another journalist explained.
In one case, Berg downplayed Amnesty International’s accusation that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.
Berg chose a headline that stated, “Israel rejects ‘fabricated’ claims of genocide,” to describe the Amnesty report and failed to post the story for 12 hours after it was written to suppress its online reach.
The journalists interviewed by Drop Site also noted that the Amnesty report was not covered on the BBC’s flagship news programs—BBC One’s News At One, News At Six, or News At Ten or its flagship current affairs program, BBC Two’s Newsnight.
“Anyone who writes on Gaza or Israel is asked: ‘Has it gone to edpol [editorial policy], lawyers, and has it gone to Raffi?’” another journalist said.
Raffi Berg, who wrote a book praising clandestine Mossad operations, wields great power to influence perceptions of Israel’s war on Gaza because the BBC news website is the most-visited news site on the internet, with over 1.1 billion visits in May alone.
Israel’s war on Gaza has killed over 45,000 Palestinians, the majority women and children, and flattened large swathes of the besieged enclave.
The pro-Israel bias imposed by Berg is evident in the language used to cover the war.
While stories “prominently” used words like “massacre,” “slaughter,” and “atrocities” to refer to Hamas, they “hardly, if at all,” used them “in reference to actions by Israel,” wrote Rami Ruhayem, a Beirut-based BBC Arabic correspondent.
In another case, the BBC published a story with a headline that hid Israel’s responsibility for killing an entire family in a missile strike.
“Israel Gaza: Father loses 11 family members in one blast,” the headline stated.
Drop Site notes that when the BBC does mention Israel as the perpetrator, it uses the caveat “reportedly.”
The BBC also uses euphemisms preferred by the Israeli army to hide its soldiers’ war crimes. For example, the BBC describes the forcible transfer or ethnic cleansing of Palestinian civilians as “evacuations.”
“UK Jewish leaders unite to condemn BBC over ‘institutional hostility’ to Israel” – The Jewish Chronicle, September 30, 2024
“TV and film industry letter accuses BBC of antisemitism” – BBC News, October 10, 2024, online
“BBC Newsroom branded out of control amid new accusations of Middle East bias…anti-Israel overtones”
[by Danny Cohen] – Gordon Rayner, The Telegraph, November 2, 2004
Fancy that!
I think we should all allow ourselves a little New Year’s joke, both to get in the mood and as a kind of self-compensation. In any case, I take Offguardian’s #SolutionsWatch request one hundred percent seriously! https://i.ibb.co/znkVB0W/OFFbrainians.jpg
According to their “authors”, it is not the J-s who are behind the whole misery, but Hitler and Stalin (who are and were ultimately the same thing).
One of their writers (who characteristically calls himself “A Communist in Hong Kong” on X) was obviously ostracized by the sceptics in an almost authoritarian manner and put on public display. https://i.ibb.co/hVGcGRY/NatWok.jpg
https://x.com/SimonElmer2022/status/1870474350945808392
https://web.archive.org/web/20241231163444/https://architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2024/10/22/the-great-replacement-immigration-in-the-uk-part-four-solutions/
Expression of psychotic alienation. Could it have
been recognized in a psychotic society in which
it flourished? It acted as a booster. He is “running
away”, that much is clear, but from what? It’s so-
mething we Germans call The Self or Our Origin.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIpfWORQWhU