‘Big Brother is watching you’ – 150 EU officials expected to monitor Elon Musk conversation with Alice Weidel, possible ban on the table
The EU is pulling out all the stops to monitor the Alice Weidel and Elon Musk interview, all while French officials put forward the idea of an EU-wide ban on X
The European Union’s outrage is only growing over a planned interview hosted by Elon Musk later today with Alternative for Germany (AfD) party co-chair Alice Weidel. Now, Politico is reporting that 150 EU officials are expected to attend the conversation between Musk and Weidel for the purpose of learning whether X is complying with EU rules. In addition, French politicians are already talking about an EU-wide ban.
The claim is that there are fears that Musk’s team will manipulate the algorithm to provide the interview more attention. However, Musk has over 200 million followers and nearly all of his posts receive millions and often tens of millions of views, which makes it certain that the interview, which has also been widely advertised, will receive significant attention.
Weidel has also taken to X about the surveillance of the upcoming interview.
“Big Brother is watching you: 150 EU officials are supposed to monitor my conversation with @elonmusk. An EU that uses its bureaucracy to exercise censorship on social media is instilling the spirit of unfreedom. The #dsa threatens democracy!” she wrote
The officials overseeing the interview are “given relatively extensive power,” according to Politico. They will be able to use, among other things, the Digital Services Act (DSA) to monitor how the algorithm works and how content is being displayed to users.
Politico writes that Musk allegedly pushed certain posts in the past, including one about the Super Bowl in the past. The alleged reason was that Musk was mad that one of President Biden’s posts were getting more attention.
The EU officials are working with experts from the European Center for Algorithmic Transparency” in Seville to determine if such an action will occur once again. However, they will not release this information immediately. Instead, it will like be added to a general procedure against X.
A wide range of EU leaders fear losing power due to shifting public sentiment, and Musk’s X represents their top threat. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot, on Wednesday, called for a decisive stand against political influence. When asked whether a ban on X, in the same style as Brazil, was possible, he responded: “That is possible under our laws.”
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez also claimed Musk was pushing “hate” and warned against the rise of fascism in Europe.
SPD General-Secretary Matthias Miersch said that Musk’s influence on Germany’s elections now “call into question the foundations of democracy.”
However, Musk is unlikely to manipulate the algorithm in favor of Weidel especially when enough people are already likely to watch the interview without any interference. Absent some overt manipulation, it is unclear what could possibly be illegal about such an interview. Musk is allowed to interview Weidel. That is his right and her right. The bigger problem would be if he censored anyone who criticized such an interview or manipulated the algorithm to suppress this criticism, which is undoubtedly what the old Twitter regime did before his purchase — all of which the EU actively supported
The head of Germany’s Federal Network Agency, Klaus Müller, appeared to take a more measured approach to the issue.
“Not everything that you get upset about is also illegal,” said Müller on Thursday morning on Deutschlandfunk. “In election campaigns, you also have to put up with things that you personally find inappropriate, indecent or unacceptable.” Freedom of expression always means “the freedom of those whose opinion you do not share.”
He said that the excitement over the Musk interview was “understandable” but it must first be observed whether any laws are actually broken during the process. He noted, however, that people could choose simply not to listen to the interview.
“Kabbalist” Laitman says there are only two possibilities: Either there is a world war – or the Jews reconsider to love the world and are loved back and recognized as world leaders. The fate of the world is therefore exclusively in the hands of the Jews.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghLNkN0BrD8
Pathological megalomania? Overconfidence? Exaggeration (artificial inflation) of one’s own importance and relevance?
The Jew generally never asks himself this question. He has a distorted view, does not see himself holistically as part of the world, but is dualistically split off from it, and therefore divides the world.
Laitman: “What are they saying, the nations? They are saying the Jews are causing all the troubles in the world, meaning by that, they admit that we are so powerful that we can cause harm to the entire world, that they are dependent on us, and is’s true.”
It’s a statement King would have been reluctant to discuss publicly, so he has to insert a familiar misattribution for “anti-Semitism”: “That’s envy, that’s jealousy.”
Laitman: “Yes, but it’s true.”
Laitmann even claims that Jews have the ability to “influence” the laws of nature, even though these laws are effective everywhere in the universe, completely independent of them. But not only that: Jews, he says, are not from Earth at all, but come from a parallel universe (although I have long suspected this myself!).
This finally gives us the right to call them extraterrestrials. But Spielberg’s E.T. was not a shape-shifter like Jews.
Perhaps, I strongly suspect, part of their claim to “influence life” is to eradicate the races by mixing them (see also Israel Zangwill’s “Melting Pot”), and to abolish the sexes by hermaphroditizing them.
Of course, this must begin very early in the life of the Goyim so that it has a lasting lifelong effect (e.g. as childlessness).
Since Jew Leitman possesses quasi-divine omniscience, he naturally also knows that many people are “born as animals and die as animals” (non-Jews are often referred to as cattle in the Torah and Talmud). Only Jews are presumably able to save their souls from death, otherwise they would not be called “God’s chosen people”. Laitmann says that his soul incarnates into other people after death (who might be affected by the haunting of his soul remains unclear).
When answering the last question, he even dares to push King’s reading slip on the table in the latter’s direction, which roughly translates into body language: he lays claim to the space occupied by King and endeavors to make it smaller by enlarging his own. But King reacts as if he doesn’t realize it, and besides, this is a conversation between quasi-divine tribal bros, so let’s not be so petty. After all, Judaism is more important than the individual ego.
Perhaps Laitman also wanted him to understand: “I’m not going to incarnate into your body, don’t get your hopes up, you’re just a subaltern employee of the divine ground staff, a man without an abdomen, a paltry talking head, while I already reside up there on the heavenly tribune of honor! You don’t even wear a yarmulke, while I wear mine everywhere!”
https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/11/rabbi-jews-are-not-of-this-world-were-sent-to-conquer-it/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bnei_Baruch
(((Tyler Feder))) https://reduxx.info/austria-children-expelled-from-kindergarten-after-their-parents-objected-to-poster-depicting-naked-trans-identified-male-displaying-his-penis/
The EU Commission planned to extend crimes to “hate speech” as comprehensively defined Ursula von der Leyen. See EUR-Lex Doc 52051DC0777 online for extensively detailed applications.
Gleichschaltung.
https://counter-currents.com/2025/01/what-jared-taylor-gets-wrong-about-west-virginia/
An American, let’s call him Jason One, with a German surname makes it clear: “Jew-haters are the AIDS of the white race.” Another American with a German surname, we’ll call him Jason Two, agrees: “It is not normal for a 40 something year old man to be this obsessed with Jews.”
Köhne & Kessler are of course neither complete idiots nor malicious disinformers, because Jews are not “our misfortune”, as the communist Nazis (Alice Weidel, Brandon Martinez aka Martin Brandyness) claimed! They urgently warn against falling into the “J-trap” like all the “wignats and schizo-spergs”!
Jews are basically not to blame for anything detrimental or negative for white humanity and the Western world! That should finally have gotten around! “Make America Great Again!” (instead of “Sieg Heil!”) is the only true message of salvation (Heilsbotschaft). Zio-Don’s renewed four years in office will prove this impressively!
https://odysee.com/@martinezperspective:2/mart-kohne:c
https://i.ibb.co/Hph21Zr/Practiced-Jasonics.jpg
So Close – Yet So Far: The Binocular Blunder
There once was a chap with binoculars keen,
Who thought he could spy every far-off scene.
He peered at the stars,
And birds from afar,
But tripped on the cat he hadn’t foreseen!
His nose in the sky, eyes fixed on the moon,
He missed all the daisies in glorious bloom.
So focused on distance,
He lacked all assistance,
To see that his wife had redecorated the room!
In search of rare eagles, he climbed every hill,
Overlooking the pigeons on his windowsill.
The far and exotic
Became quite neurotic,
While missing the beauty of his own little ville.
So remember, dear friends, as you gaze far and wide,
The nearest and dearest are still by your side.
For life’s greatest treasures
And simplest pleasures
Are often right here, not where binoculars guide!
In his recent video, mainstream narrative historian Felton shares his appreciation for a pair of World War II binoculars that he values highly. While he discusses their significance, he conveniently overlooks an important detail: these binoculars, like many wartime artifacts, were produced by companies with deep German roots – a telling example of the complex narratives surrounding the war.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5B3yk5qn9io
Anglo-Americans bombed Germany in planes designed by German engineers, rolled through France on wheels made from rubber substitutes supplied by German manufacturers, and used German binoculars to spot Germans. The M1 Garand rifle, standard issue for U.S. forces, was manufactured by Springfield Armory, founded by German immigrant Christian Sharps. The iconic Jeep was produced by Willys-Overland Motors, a company with ties to German ancestry.
Boeing, as a major bomber manufacturer during World War II with aircraft like the B-17 Flying Fortress, also has roots in German heritage. William E. Boeing’s father was a German immigrant who arrived in the United States in 1868, contributing to the legacy of one of the world’s largest aerospace companies.
As they advanced through Europe, the Allies relied on precision optics from firms like Carl Zeiss and Bausch & Lomb – both heavily influenced by their German heritage. The very tools of warfare often came from the same lineage they were fighting against.
In the air, the legacy of aircraft designers like Ernst Heinkel and Kurt Tank loomed large, with their innovations shaping both German and Allied aviation strategies. Notably, the North American P-51 Mustang – a fighter aircraft that became one of the most effective planes of the war – was developed under the leadership of James H. Kindelberger, a man of German descent.
Chester W. Nimitz also stands out as a significant figure during this time. Born in Fredericksburg, Texas, to a family of German origin, Nimitz played a crucial role as Commander in Chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet during World War II. His leadership was instrumental in turning the tide against Japan after the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Another poignant story is that of Georgi Langemak, who played a significant role in designing the Katjuscha rocket launcher, known to Germans as the “Stalinorgel.” Despite his contributions to Soviet artillery technology, Langemak fell victim to Stalin’s purges and was executed in 1938. Decades later, he was posthumously rehabilitated and recognized as one of the leading creators of this feared weapon.
Even as they engaged in battle, it was hard to ignore the irony: ethnic Germans fought on both sides of the conflict. History has a peculiar way of intertwining destinies, reminding us that in war, lines are often blurred and shared heritage can lead to unexpected alliances.
The fact that they fought against their homeland and frequently gave their lives underscores the deep divisions within their communities and the tangled relationships of identity and loyalty in wartime.
Furthermore, ethnic Germans were often viewed with suspicion as enemies within the “Five Eyes” alliance – a situation reminiscent of prejudices from World War I. Yet they were still used as cannon fodder in a war against their own homeland.
It becomes clear that history is often shaped by those who wield power – and sometimes that power comes from a lineage we least expect. The complexities of identity and heritage reveal connections that challenge our understanding of loyalty and enmity during one of history’s darkest chapters.
In another of his videos, Felton raises a concern about British bridges and infrastructure being at risk from unexploded German ordnance left over from the Blitz. It’s a curious point to ponder, especially considering the staggering disparity in the scale of destruction wrought during the war.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVFBXfmCDVQ
While he highlights the dangers posed by these leftover bombs, one can’t help but recall that the bomb load dropped by the Germans over Britain was a mere fraction compared to what Anglo-American forces unleashed upon Germany—reportedly a ratio of 1:221.
This contrast begs the question: should we be more concerned about the remnants of German bombs in London or the extensive devastation caused by Allied bombing campaigns across German cities?
The irony is palpable; while British infrastructure might still bear the scars of war, it is the sheer volume of bombs dropped on Germany that truly illustrates the scale of destruction and suffering experienced during World War II.
As Felton navigates these narratives, it serves as a reminder that history often presents us with complex layers of irony, where perceptions of victimhood and responsibility can shift dramatically depending on one’s perspective.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iml195UxmMM
Not all Englishmen have been happy about the scale of WW2 bombing inflicted on German civilians; e.g. F. J. P. Veale, “Advance to Barbarism” (1948). The sooner resentments between the English and Germans, and mutual caricatures, are put aside in favour of European co-operation, the better.
Your statement is a bit schizophrenic, if I may be so bold. Because if you recommend the book in question to me, then you should have left out the last part of your comment, which indirectly insinuates resentment on my part (which is considered unfounded):
“A major focus of the book is on the war crimes trials in Nuremberg and Tokyo after the Second World War. Veale sharply criticizes these trials, claiming that they established the dangerous principle that ‘the most serious war crime is to be on the losing side’.”
https://archive.org/details/AdvanceToBarbarism/mode/2up
I strongly suspect that your contradictory attitude has to do with your own family history, which you have already mentioned. Had your relative, the RAF pilot who was shot down, also dropped bombs over Germany by then?
PS: However, some of your compatriots still seem to be quite happy about the outcome of history and are celebrating their “heroic deeds” (and possibly even staging themselves as “victims” instead of sinking into the ground in shame). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWNU3rpARj8
This timid attempt to address the arrogant victor’s justice is unfortunately still far from being a “decisive majority opinion” among British historians. And that is why there is no English-language Wikipedia article about him. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgv8VoyJ3wA
https://de.zxc.wiki/wiki/Keith_Lowe_(Schriftsteller)
After all, there are some who, instead of applauding their “heroic deeds”, are looking for the Lorelei. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5Vk-B5oRzM
If, as you say, you live in Germany, you need to watch this series. In it, there is an encounter with one of these bomber heroes, who is apparently still “traumatized” by his murderous deeds in such a way that he has never talked to anyone about it. https://tinyurl.com/259xxscd
The “old boy” does not quite succeed in appearing as a hero and suppressing his shame. However, he doesn’t exactly burst into tears. I strongly suspect that there are or have been hundreds, if not thousands, of such “fates” of misguided “patriotism” by the Churchill & Co. gang.
Good content, nothing can be found out about the creator.
https://archive.org/details/the-wignat-question
https://archive.org/details/addressing-a-few-going-free-questions-and-concerns
I have to be honest, this Taylor is getting more and more suspicious to me, more and more unsympathetic. I think he’s a fraud, trying to distract from the JQ with some redundantly repeated “IQ” studies that the world has known about since the “Bell Curve” anyway.
Yes: “IQ instead of JQ!” sums up Taylor’s entire (long outdated and blown up) thought structure/ideology. But quite a few of his stupid American fans are still falling for this extremely clumsy scam because they don’t recognize any connections, which makes them even less likely to do so.
“Lord Taylor” willingly blocks them from thinking, questioning, analyzing and drawing conclusions on their own. The Palestinian “super-Semite” Hanania at least brings up a few substantial arguments.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsfU6Rpe6nU
Mr. Collett forgets to cite Jewish-initiated feminism, the LGBTQ movement, pornography, abortion and the “contraceptive pill” as factors in the birth rate decline.
https://odysee.com/@MarkCollett:6/20250110—Abundance—Falling-Birth-Rates:f
“‘Suddenly Enemy of the State’ is a cinematic attempt at a head-on confrontation with the everyday madness in my adopted country of Germany.” (Activate available subs in English!)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTOA7EQpxeY
https://de.zxc.wiki/wiki/Imad_Karim
The “Islamophobic” Lebanese Imad Karim has once again filmed his paranoia here in order to foist it on his fans as a black pill against a “hostile takeover” (Thilo Sarrazin) of pseudo-Germany.
These are people who are serious about “saving” the lie and illusion of “democracy”, which is actually the cause of all this destruction.
Strangely enough, all future and functioning world powers will no longer be “democracies”, as even the left-wing Jew William Blum knew, who of course never blamed the Jews, but the CIA, Pentagon and White House.
Even the introduction is based on false premises and the misconception that “leftwing-liberalism” is a costumed variation of fascism. That is why he constantly quotes Orwell (who a leftist himself btw.).
This is a deliberate post-war narrative: fascism was the most horrific thing that ever existed on earth. Strangely enough, in the new history of mankind there has never been another politician as popular with the people as Hitler.
Believers in the Jewish narrative of the “monster Hitler” explain the contradiction between truth and fiction or ideological distortion by the fact that Hitler possessed quasi-magical powers of seduction, and millions of unsuspecting and gullible people “misled” into a fatal worship of him.
Not even real monsters and vampiristic multi-billionaires like Soros or “Larry” Fink seem to be able to do this, so it must be devilishly satanic.
The film also features the “Amadeu Antonio Foundation” (founded and run by Jewish Stasi informer Anetta Kahane, quote: “East Germany is still far too white/ethnically homogeneous/not diverse enough!”), comparable to Jewish organizations such as SPLC or “Anti”-Defamation League.
https://dailystormer.in/the-splc-keeps-a-countdown-of-americas-dwindling-white-population/
Why Karim calls his (ex-) wife “Eva Krenz” (not to be confused with Elin Krantz) seems equally mysterious. In the collective German memory, the name Krenz is associated with a Stalinist politician named Egon Krenz.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Elin_Krantz
In the opening of the program you can see Fritz Stern (full Jew), Egon Bahr (quarter Jew), Egon Krenz (half Jew).
https://i.ibb.co/XYT8QSb/image.jpg
“He never got to know his biological father; after his mother’s death, he received letters saying that his father was a Jewish tailor from Kolberg, but this could no longer be proven with certainty.” The evidence is proven by his physiognomy alone: “I think you look so southern/Mediterranean.”
https://youtu.be/DEgbZzbvSUo?feature=shared&t=4462
The interview is conducted by the “left-liberal millionaire heir” Jacob Augstein, son of Martin Walser (who was already caught in the crossfire as an “anti-Semite” because of his book “Death of a Critic”). Augstein Jr. was denounced by hardcore Zionist Henryk M. Broder at the “Simon Wiesenthal Center” and named “Anti-Semite of the Year”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jakob_Augstein#Accusations_of_antisemitism_from_the_Simon_Wiesenthal_Center
I will post this, but frankly, Mr. Taylor has done great things for our side. We should respect his wishes to avoid the very and difficult messy JQ.
TYVM for this freedom.
“Mr. Taylor has done great things for our side.”
Yes, that’s what they always say. There’s an unspoken of consensus not to target him, he has the (self-knitted) nimbus of an “untouchable”. Unlike the Dalit of India, he does not belong to the lowest, but highest caste. Thanks to this status, he has air sovereignty that not only dominates the discourse, but paralyzes, freezes and cements it.
But perhaps this is a misconception, and Mr. Taylor is in fact an inhibitor who keeps and binds people on the wrong side? I dare to put this thesis up for debate, at least for once. I really have silently observed and accepted his approach for years. But my sympathy for him has now completely melted like soft ice cream in the midday sun.
Yes, that’s what they always say. And anyone who argues against it must expect a “shistorm”. But perhaps this is a misconception, and Mr. Taylor is in fact an obstructionist, or as they say in railroad jargon, “not a stoker but a brakeman” who keeps people on the wrong side and ties them up? I dare to put this thesis up for debate, at least for once.
One could almost speak of an infatuation with him that is largely based on the belief in authority and the search for a (substitute) father figure that is widespread in right-wing and conservative circles. This makes Taylors feel smug; he is unable to conceal his vanity behind feigned modesty.
He uses his almost “sophistical” eloquence primarily to blunt sharp arguments, wrap them in absorbent cotton and remove them from the conversation as “absurd and useless”. I am convinced that he is diverting the revolutionary energy that is fizzling out into an intellectual void, and from the cause (Jews) to the consequences (“POCs”).
In this way, he in turn provides the Jews with a template to continue to accuse Whites of their “racial hatred” and to deprive them more and more of their rights. Consistently thought through, this is, in my opinion, Taylor’s deliberate intention, which means that he himself is aware that his supposed “strategy” must fail for the sake of the whole.
And btw: Hitler had also initially “done more for the movement than anyone else”, but when he passed his mental and physical zenith, from then on he only messed everything up. And because of all those who didn’t dare to defy his “omniscient authority”, they were dragged into the abyss with him.
Things went downhill with increasing speed. Many companies even went bankrupt simply because “nobody dared to criticize the boss’s pet project”. Sometimes it’s just mindless old-age stubbornness behind all this “cult of personality”. One has to take a look at organizational psychology.
However, comparing Hitler to Taylor is too much of an honor (for whom, you can choose).
In a healthy society, only the so-called “arms-bearing bodies”, i.e. the army and police, should have the right to own and use weapons, and otherwise only hunters and foresters. The same applies to drugs, which do not belong in the hands of irresponsible private individuals, and certainly not in the hands of children and adolescents, but only in the hands of doctors and geriatric nurses (“drug store”, in German “Drogerie”).
In a so-called “democracy” (which is as democratic as Hitler’s party was “socialist”), which is not, like dictatorship, oriented towards community (of whatever kind) but towards the narcissistic-egoistic individual, legitimate gun ownership naturally means permanent abuse by incompetent and malicious individuals (also known as criminality). From the Mafia (which drove Mussolini into “individualistic” America) to migrant clans/gangs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcAQLWb1XJ8
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/if-you-draw-a-historical-compa-UeKgPL4iSeyYPj_5K3K9PQ