White Dreams and the Politics of Cold Turkey: The Internecine Proclivities of White People
It was two thousand years ago that the Roman writer Juvenal warned us to beware of our dreams coming true. An attractive Roman noblewoman may go to great lengths in her self-adornment only to discover how intensely she is hated by her less physically endowed female companions. Comes the time when the envy of her less attractive entourage turns her accomplished dreamlife into a living hell. Likewise, a wealthy praetor when travelling with his body guards outside Rome stops indulging in his fame and ruminates how not to get mugged by highway robbers instead. The philosopher and lawyer Cicero was the best orator in the Roman empire whose self-complacency eventually cost him the loss of his head by the jealous would-be emperor Mark Antony. His handsome colleague and client, the famous theater actor Quintus Roscius was forced to forfeit his narcistic self-adulation having been obliged to spend most of his backstage life dodging lawfare for his tax evasion. Had he lost the presidential election, despite his phenomenal combative spirit in fighting the DOJ’s Bolshevik-inspired trumped-up charges, president Trump would be by now en route to federal penitentiary.
“Be careful what you wish for” is a fine English expression which lacks a verbal and conceptual equivalent in other European languages. It does, however, reflect the very opposite of grandiose dreams come true. Maybe the best medicine for a livable life is the suppression of free will as preached by the ikons of cultural pessimism, Emile Cioran and Arthur Schopenhauer. Squashing free will and suppressing all political appetites may be also the best answer for an aspiring public figure given that at some point in time his legacy will only be remembered as a criminal enterprise. Over the course of time the unity of opposites leads to the paradox of unintended consequences and unanticipated political disasters. It is only a matter of time that a ruler’s erstwhile stardom will be labeled a crime, or even worse that his name will be chiseled out as damnatio memoriae. Which option to choose; keep a low profile and live one’s life in self-abnegation? Or dwell in an overdrive promethean hubris-like self-delusion of working for the greater good? Ten, hundred, or five hundred years later a politician’s achieved goals will be the target of public demonization. Tearing down the statues of Confederate heroes is just the latest example of unintended consequences that must have slipped the mind of Jefferson Davis and R.E. Lee. The distinction between good and evil is just a matter of individual judgment in accordance to the dominant lie of a given epoch. Even a popular English proverb that “every cloud has a silver lining,” which has a better graphic equivalent in the French language, à quelque chose malheur est bon (“out of bad comes good”) sounds grotesque. It can’t be a solace for a politician sentenced to death for his lost war, nor can it bring relief to a heretic preaching untimely beliefs. With the increasing racial replacement in the U.S. the founding fathers Jefferson and Hamilton will soon be featured in school curricula as the architypes of White Evil, all ready to join the club of hundreds of the damned ones, including the proverbial Hitler and his ilk.
It is a great merit of behavior geneticists and evolutionary biologists to single out the prime role of heredity, particularly when it comes to our political choices when facing off a hostile outgroup. The study of the genetics of race can also help us much in uncovering a sociopathic would-be loudmouth within our own ingroup. Due to the steady bolshevization of social science studies since 1945, it should not come as a surprise why the research in these fields has been avoided like the plague in the Western school curriculum. The good news is that the post-WWII gigantic egalitarian multiracial scam, whether in its communist or liberal form, is falling apart. The decades-long official U.S. Soviet-inspired multiracial-DEI- affirmative action-woke policies are showing their dysfunctional and destructive results in an all social, economic, and military realms. Even its erstwhile supporters are increasingly becoming aware of it..
Ingroup infighting
Is a racially homogenous society based on meritocratic and hierarchical principles i.e., that everybody must have his own due (suum cuique) the best answer? The works of dozens of prominent geneticists have confirmed that ingroup members are biologically predisposed to flock to their kind, especially when a threat of aggression from outgroups looms. How is it then that more Whites since time immemorial have been killed by people who were in fact their own ingroup members (whatever labels they were using) than by hordes of invading outgroups? Why deny that the entire history of white Europe and America, despite their cultural braggadocio, is largely a history of civil wars? Wishful thinking about the expulsion of all non-Whites, or a putative establishment of secessionist all-White statelets in the U.S. or E.U. will likely lead to another round of mutual inter-White incriminations and civil wars. Also worth pointing out is that non-White and non-European outgroups perceive the history of interminable inter-European wars very differently from how European nations perceive their dispute with similar neighboring outgroups.
Policies based on identity, however romantic they sound, are based on the exclusion of alterity. All of us define our Selves only in comparison to the Other. Example? There is not a single nation in Europe that has been spared from murderous wars with its next-door European neighbor. Very likely White infighting will continue unabated even if all 30 million non-Whites in Europe and over 150 million non-Whites in North America were miraculously to disappear. Alas, birds of feather do not always flock together. In fact, any conflict becomes the more gruesome the less visible racial, linguistic and cultural lines exist between two neighboring groups sharing the same DNA. On the other hand, the more geographically distant nations are from each other, the more likely they will tolerate their mutual differences. As a rule, each ingroup perceives its next door similar as an affront, as a denial or as a caricature of its own identity, as was amply shown during the recent bloody conflict between Serbs and Croats. “The closer we are to the Other”, writes Alain de Benoist, “the more violently we will fight against him, because the very fact of his proximity makes his Otherness all the more scandalous.”
In their turn non-White, non-European observers and scholars, let alone millions of low-IQ non-White migrants flooding Europe and America must be scandalized and bedeviled by disputes between European nations. Historical disagreements resulting in bloody wars between genetically similar Irish and English, between Basques and Castilians, between, Germans and Poles, between Hungarians and Romanians, between Flemings and Walloons must appear to them as a sign of the insanity of the White man. This is the subject White homeland advocates have failed to address. A well-researched work on the sociobiology of civil wars between European nations is sorely missing.
At the heart of interminable inter-White ingroup disputes and civil wars one must single out the destructive role of millennia-long Judeo-Chistian-Islamic monotheism. The catastrophic results of the Abrahamic dogma have been the main engine of European ingroup civil wars, both in their theological and ideological versions. Belief in the existence of only one God presupposes the belief in only one political truth and the rejection of other possible truths. Civil wars among White Europeans, stretching from the first Christian emperor Constantine to the Second World War, all the way to the current war between genetically similar Russians and Ukrainians, have their roots in secularized forms of Christianity. By contrast, old Romans and Greeks, although waging merciless wars against foreign tribes never imposed their diverse deities and their own political beliefs on conquered tribes. In fact, they often borrowed gods from conquered tribes and had them added to their own pantheon.
One can sing the praises of ancient Roman religious tolerance, but the Greco-Roman civil wars amidst the same polytheistic ingroups were not very divine at all. One does not need to recap he Thirty Years Peloponnesian war between the racially same Athenians and Spartans. Very likely similar inter-White carnage will continue in our postmodernity even if all non-White citizens were forced to depart from Europe and America.
One can justly condemn the jealous Jewish god Yahve and his totalitarian ukases against the unchosen ones: “The Lord your God will cut off before you the nations you are about to invade and dispossess” (Deuteronomy 12:29-32). The secular version of this old Yahve’s decree comes now as a free pass for the IDF serial killings of Arabs in the Gaza Strip. Neither have the Christians lagged much behind in their killing sprees within their own racial ingroup, each ingroup sect or clan claiming to hold the only appropriate master key to the Christian heaven. “If anyone comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple.” (Luke, 14:26). The Russo- Ukrainian conflict is just the latest Gentile secular offshoot of the monotheist Judeo-Christian- inspired mindset.
Wern Graul (1905–1984): Christian Desecration of the Oak Tree
One must rightly be shocked with ancient Christian and Jewish preachers and their liberal and communist commissars preaching once upon a time the Gospel of antipaganism and lecturing on the importance of antifascism today. But the pagan ingroup and inter-clan violence is also full of gory scenes. Hundreds of historical and mythical texts testify to it. The egotistic Titan Saturn, in order to preserve his sole rule on his global turf did not hesitate a minute to devour his son, the future god Zeus. In the much-vaunted Iliad, the pagan hero Achilles drags the desecrated body of Hector along the walls of Troya, causing discomfort among pagan Troyan mourners worshiping the same gods (The Iliad, Book XXII) . Ovid’s Metamorphoses depicts an orgy of ingroup violence such as when the Balkan-Thracian king Tereus rapes his wife’s sister Philomela and cuts her tongue off in order to prevent her from going public about the crime. Orestes kills her mother Clytemnestra for her cheating on his father and her husband Agammemnon. Neither would have the foundation of the ancient pagan city of Rome been possible without having jealous Romulus kill his brother Remus.
Francisco Goya (1746–1828): Saturn devouring his son
In the study of modern political and academic self-censorship and woke witch-hunts against free thinkers in the EU and the US it is imperative to study Ovid’s bloody allegory of human, subhuman and transhuman transformations.
The cases of more secular and historically recorded ingroup savagery are timeless and countless. The emperor Nero had his mother killed. His lifelong mentor the wealthiest man in Rome, the philosopher Seneca, who liked to brag stoically about modesty and tolerance, was subsequently killed by Nero — his former imperial pupil. Emperor Marcus Aurelius, much eulogized in history books for his compassion and magnanimity toward his defeated foes must have badly misdirected his stoic genes; his son, the emperor Commodus, was the foremost sexual pervert in the Roman empire. Shakespeare’s dramas also abound in ingroup and intrafamilial killings, mostly by the rulers suffering from mental or sexual deformities, as illustrated in his play Richard III. Shakespear’s king Richard is not a far cry from many contemporary White nationalists in the US and Europe parading themselves as undisputed future leaders daydreaming about how to save the West.
And therefore, since I cannot prove a lover
To entertain these fair well-spoken days
I am determined to prove a villain
And hate the idle pleasures of these days. (Act 1, Scene 1)
White dreams turned into the tragic opposite following 1945. But even if Hitler and Mussolini and similar or sympathetic politicians in Europe and the U.S. of that epoch had won the war, or at least won the day, their dreams would have materialized by now into something entirely different. White dreams caused by acid or crack can help in arresting or even reverse the flow of time, but the aftermath is never pleasant.
……………………..
Further reading:
- Alain de Benoist, “Violence sacrée guerre et monothéisme”, Krisis (33/April 2010).
- Hervé Coutau-Bégarie “A quoi sert la guerre?” Krisis (34/June, 2010).
- Gaius Suetonius, The Twelve Caesars, edited by J. Rives (Penguin Classics, 2007).
Yeah, the subject of the limits of cooperation among white ethnicities is one that needs to be addressed. I try to do so in a section of a book that I’m writing. Would you like to read the passage, Dr. Sunic? I could put an excerpt of just the relevent part in essay form, and see if Dr. MacDonald would approve it for posting.
In the end, I think the matter goes back to the need of genetic groups to refine vs defend: greater numbers usually mean better defence against outgroups, but preserving all of the ingroup, let alone giving them equal status, can diminish overall quality. Hence, the balance is achieved by having us wired to overlook differences and unite when danger rears but revert to a refining intra-group competition in its absense.
Switzerland & Great Britain have not done too badly. Tom Sunic’s homeland not so good!
The outer & inner enemies are now non-European.
A common defence against race replacement is reasonable and urgent for all white nations.
I find “white unity” problematic. I would prefer not to be around British. I like them more than Nigerians but certainly not “my people”. They are like super boomers in their lack of real understanding of reality. Mark Collette and friends are obvious exceptions.
@ Gerbils
I don’t like you, but would not condemn your entire race of rodents.
Do you include all regions of Great Britain, every occupation, &c.?
I feel more at home among Germans than Welsh-speakers, but believe that it is high time we united all Europeans, and resisted immigration from Nigerians, Pakistanis or Chinese.
You can email me the passage from your book. Also tell me more about the project.
For example, I have regularly suffered from nightmares for about two years (after very drastic events in my life, separation from descendants, death of family members). My influence on this is zero. Sometimes it is better, sometimes more “traumatic” (Traum means Dream in German).
In dreams, I am basically a loser who is deprived and denied everything. My dreams are a horror scenario concerning human relationships. My waking state is a paradise in comparison.
I can’t explain how or why this happens, because in my waking state I am a relatively carefree person (although there would be endless reasons for others in my position to worry).
There are also people for whom this is the exact opposite: Waking is a nightmare, while sleep is the only salvation.
A Jewish “psychoanalyst” would probably conclude that I had successfully learned to repress my “fears”, whereas in my sleep they would just pop up again like a ball that you can’t keep permanently under water without it escaping to the surface.
I suppress “fears” by denying them completely! I negate them! I deny them any nourishment, I starve them. I make them ineffective by denying them their existence, in which they can first manifest and spread until they end up taking over and occupying the whole mind.
When fear takes hold of the mind, this manifests itself in very unpleasant physical symptoms. Fear (die Anst) is feminine in German, courage (der Mut, the overcoming of fear) is masculine. Which means that fear is an insidious disease of the soul, based on the feminine principle of shying away from a fight and withdrawing as a loser.
Then these fear-mongers try to persuade you that “your” fears do exist, that you should finally take note of them. They simply don’t exist, for the sole reason that fears are “transmitted” to us by our fellow human beings. However, I refuse to accept the pernicious package of these diaper-soft panic and alarm letter carriers.
If you take a closer look at the subject of fear, it is a nebulous word that conveys powerlessness, despair and helplessness. One literally pokes around in the “fog”, while the fog is the feminine-unconcrete, indirect, indefinable. Fear is alarmism in the face of a permanent threat.
It is also important to know that fear is the opposite of freedom. Fear (Angst) has the same word root as narrowness (Enge) in German. Linguistically, fear is related to Furcht, which is a little more concrete than the bad “German Angst”.
If you ask someone what exactly they are afraid of, they can react by activating their Geist and verbalizing their “irrational” fear and taking precautionary measures. For example, someone suffering from a fear of flying can avoid flying and instead use a ship as a means of transportation.
The fear of a plane crash, for example, is the lack of trust in the competence of other people or their “absolutely reliable technology”. Some people need ground under their feet to feel safe. The fear of great heights is probably the fear of losing control or an unconscious longing for death that one could give in to.
If you do not stand up against fearful thoughts or thoughts of fearful content, which are always directed towards the future, they will take hold of you and bring you down.Fatalism, defeatism, pessimism, doomsaying. This is capitulation to supposed fate.
One must also be aware of the following mode of action: What I focus my mind on will grow and increase. This is a natural law. If I occupy myself daily with negative content, listen to depressive music etc., this content will lead to a loss of inner freedom. Something always sticks with you and rubs off on you.
That is why the Roman Juvenal’s statement that “one should beware of one’s dreams” is idiotic at best. Dreams are the unconscious emptying out its garbage bag in a motley and unsorted manner, nothing more. No countermeasure is possible except an active, self-confident and fundamentally confident way of life.
And that brings us to the subject of affluent waste. The Germans are notorious for their recycling mania. The Jews claim that they, too, have been sorted out and separated, even recycled as lampshades, hair mattresses and soap. The innate collective Jewish psychopathy, which is also expressed in ahistorical Hollywood horror cinema, presumably plays an important role here.
“Buried alive”: The consumerist hordingsd disorder (German “Messie-Syndrom”) is an expression of mental/physical weakness und impotence. https://counter-currents.com/2025/01/hoarders/
Holistically speaking, no digestion takes place here, neither physically nor mentally, in which the useful is separated from the garbage. Like a fat body that can no longer keep up with the elimination of solids in the face of further food intake. This is probably why many overweight Americans are also messies.
Professor Sunic notes that the “fine” British saying “Be careful what you wish for” lacks a continental European equivalent. To be honest, I’m not surprised at all, because the saying is totally pointless and idiotic.
You should not be careful of your wishes, because all poor people wish for wealth. Rich people, however, are convinced that they are entitled to wealth. What you expect will come true, so adjust your expectations positively and always expect the best! “Wishful thinking” is anything but confidence.
The only thing that works is structured, realistic thinking and action, and achieving goals step by step through perseverance. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Kondo
Tonight I had another one of those inescapable exemplary nightmares, an absolute horror trip of humiliation. Although its symbolism is easy to decipher, it has nothing in common with my life situation. In the dream, I was with the woman who is the mother of my child (who did not appear in the dream at all) in real life on a kind of country estate, a kind of modest but spacious and well-kept finca in the idyllic countryside, it could also have been one of those new-fangled organic farms that I ran together with this woman in the dream.
The two of us were initially the only people for miles around who appeared in the dream. I have to say that in my waking state I don’t waste the slightest thought on this woman, who was actually one of these eco-fanatics, but on the contrary, I am more than happy to have “escaped” from her, even if I had to give up contact with my child, which was the “price” for it, so to speak. But in my dreams she regularly “pursues” me, haunts me, humiliates and picks on me as a loser who comes away empty-handed and encounters her total rejection.
Anyway, suddenly Elon Musk appeared in the dream as a kind of visitor and third person and the three of us were sitting at a table in a kind of eat-in kitchen, doing some kind of learning course that we had to practise together. A constellation of three in which there was obviously one too many, and that was of course me. The ex-“partner” said to me: “You have to understand that this is my only chance to become wealthy, we can meet again afterwards, once I’ve married him and then get divorced with a million-dollar settlement.”
I could see that economically, but not as a man. Gritting my teeth, I accepted it as a one-off opportunity. I could have been a professor myself with a generous pension and I wouldn’t have been able to compete with that, I would have remained a low earner. My modest income was obviously not enough for her. She took an increasing liking to him and he didn’t seem to have any problem with pinching my wife. He didn’t even talk to me, but acted as if I was completely superfluous and non-existent. Self-confident and good-humored, just as we know him from the media in “reality”.
Then I ended up having to listen to them moaning from the next room every night and “interesting conversations with the world-famous billionaire” during the day. In the end, I made a defiant act of liberation that thwarted the two “love birdies” and restored my independence, but which I no longer remember specifically because I woke up shortly afterwards, as tortured, whacked and drained as always. It can’t have anything to do with alcohol consumption, because I hadn’t drunk any.
The theme of the dream was apparently pronounced inferiority complexes due to a lack of status. Why can’t I be the winner that everyone adores and worships at least for once? I wonder who sends me such diabolical dreams. Sometimes I think it might be some kind of psychotropic reaction to my excessive use of e-cigarettes, which I started about two years ago instead of smoking tobacco, but I couldn’t find any connection between nightmares and the use of e-cigarettes on the internet.
Re..Harald…..Fabulous incisive trenchant …liberating words. precisely why we read TOO comments and articles…*
Of course, I am aware that our lives inevitably end with a surrender to the inevitable. I have experienced this many times with loved ones who, after a lifetime of independence, were finally at the mercy of total dependence and lost their will to live for that very reason.
I am prepared for this. “Life is not a pony farm” (German proverb). The somewhat worn-out term resilience means not being discouraged despite defeats and disappointments. “Humor means laughing anyway,” is a German proverb.
“Und ihr habt doch gesiegt!” (“And yet you won!”) is a slogan from National Socialism. Even if they were only given 12 short years, they were worth it. These people, who experienced terrible things, got more out of life than our segregated culture of losers.
So it’s not about “wishing, waiting, wondering”, or “fake it til you make it”, but about the conscious attitude, the mindset of still snotting in the face of death with the words “And yet it’s worth living!” Until then, I’m dancing on the edge of the volcano! For this very reason!
Whites are not responsible for what the Arabs, Chinese, Indians, sub-saharans and mongols did to each other. Over the last several millennia. The 100 million killed last century were for bloodthirsty jews. In gulags run by jews. China starved millions. Humanity has a war problem, not whites.
The fundamental change is that the judenvermin have now seen that their brown hordes will kill them. White Men need to stop fighting each other and form an in group. The invasive species are a common enemy to help this process along. European people must all be in one house. There is no other way for them to survive. The brother wars between White Men must end. When all White Men are together, the enemy will be destroyed.
Well, that’s why Christian Identity is not only true but so very important. Why is it that white nationalists refuse to acknowledge The obvious truth that the people we call Hebrews, the people who came up with scripture and the people who are actually the descendants of Jacob Israel Comprise the white race and that that entire book, including its gruesome finale, belongs to us? This is something that was in the background of Francis Parker Yockey’s mind When he wrote his book, Imperium. Sure it was about sifting through high culture and high politics, but ultimately the aim was to bring everything back around again to the Gothic impulse in us, our urge and desire to be separate from all the other races with a place of our own. We have done this repeatedly through the millennia, but now there’s nowhere else to go, and our backs are up against the wall.
Neither “British” nor “White” Israel identity cults, and the various genealogies, are “obvious” at all, but have been refuted by scriptural and historical scholarship many times. Hebrew and Aryan languages are also significantly dissimilar. A pity maybe, but that is the case.
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/has-oskar-maria-graf-s-gelacht-6c6bU_x8St22AbBB6nG.lA
https://news.google.com/search?q=Sven%20Liebich&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen
https://news.google.com/search?q=unity%20midford&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen
https://de.zxc.wiki/wiki/Osteria_Italiana
Untranslated due to numerous Bavarianisms.
https://pdfhost.io/v/TCXQk7PVl_Gelchter_von_aussen
Was the psychopathic Germanophobe, sadist & mass murderer Eisenhower a crypto-mulatto with Afro-blood in his veins? Or to put it another way: Are Muricans in gerneral a “nation” of mongrelz? https://tinyurl.com/4h5kexp8
A certain similarity to negroid skull shape and physiognomy cannot be completely denied, at least according to Docta Trish, and she must know. I also think da docta’s Ebonics sociolect would fit perfectly to mentally deranged “Ike”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p66Wd9dAS2c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AjtUOytR7oE
We heard for decades that Eisenhower was some type of maroon black jew…the..Swedish jew?.honestly ..we never researched that because Eisenhower was such a malevolent despicable smarmy low character..one should wonder how such characters can sleep at night …..believing….preaching..teaching and acting out so many lies and mass murders….
Being that he wasn’t actually a white person, I don’t think he had to worry that much about it. By his own admission, he despised Germans, and he was a lifelong Democrat until told to run for president as a Republican by Adlai Stevenson.
Mr Sunich has excellent taste in art.
You are correct in so far as white people have varying degrees of belief in the three headed monster. That being said, the three headed monster is a lie, and Christianity is specifically and only for people of the white race. White nationalists, just like the population at large, have never actually bothered studying scripture to realize what and who it is all about. There is only one true. God, his name is Yahweh, he is the father of the white race through Adam and from Adam down to Jacob who became Israel and father 12 sons. These sons represent the white race in all of its variations and are now primarily people we would consider Anglo-Saxon and Slavs.