South Africa

/2 Comments/in /by

2 replies
  1. Harald
    Harald says:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISB48ZxHfLI

    “Fortress of Lugh” – or ”Lug und Trug”, is the question here. Kyle Hunt has once again linked this in – one of his many – the nonsense “articles” that make no logical sense at all. I strongly suspect that he is of Irish descent, as his limited intellectual capacity is a clear indication.

    https://www.dict.cc/deutsch-englisch/Lug+und+Trug.html

    This “Lugh”, with all his mythological nonsense on his channel, is Hunt’s permanent recommendation, because he immensely accommodates and serves his tendency to see the world as a storybook.

    In my opinion, his method, according to ethnic origin in the sense of nations and peoples, makes no racial sense at all. Once again, the Germans are being cheated out of their contribution, as is usual with the arrogant “Anglos”.

    The self-declared Canadian, who in reality lives in China and speaks an “accent” that does not sound “Canadian” but is more reminiscent of Russian as a native language, for example, ignores the fact that German-Americans make up by far the largest proportion of European descendants in the USA, at least for the last 150 years.

    The question is a completely different one: To what extent are “North Americans” divided not by “ethnic”, i.e. national origin (“nations” did not exist until very late in European human history), but by gene pool from the European families of Germanic, Romanic, Celtic and Slavic peoples?

    Greeks and other mini-peoples are negligible (not to mention the Negroes!). And given the fact that the Brits are for the most part genetically Germanic and not Celtic, like the Irish and French, things look quite different. But even the French originated from the Germans.

    Mr. Lugh refers to New Brunswick as a “Canadian nucleus of British origin”, so to speak, although it is named after the German city of Braunschweig. Apart from the fact that America got both its name and its currency from Germans.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodiscus

  2. Harald
    Harald says:

    Here is a little consolation for all Irish and Celts:

    Modern Germans possess a mixed genetic heritage, showing significant Celtic and Germanic ancestry. Current studies indicate that while 45% of male Germans have Celtic ancestors through the R1b haplogroup, only 6% of Germans have paternal Germanic origins. In contrast, approximately 50% of German women have maternal Germanic ancestry.

    The World Wars significantly impacted German genetics due to the massive loss of life, particularly among young men, with an estimated 25% of fertile men dy*ng in the conflicts. This likely contributed to the current low percentage of paternal Germanic lineage.

    The genetic makeup of Germans is complex, also including approximately 30% with Eastern European ancestry. The pre-war genetic composition is not well-documented, but it’s understood that European genetics were shaped by prehistoric migration waves. This existing genetic diversity underscores that there is no single, uniform “German genetic origin.”

    It’s difficult to definitively state if Germans were more or less Germanic during wartime compared to pre-war. Genetic diversity was already present due to prehistoric migrations. Germans have a mix of Celtic, Germanic, and Eastern European ancestry. Germans may never have been as Germanic as Scandinavians. The concept of a “pure” Germanic origin isn’t scientifically valid.

Comments are closed.