Why sensible people don’t trust the NYTimes — And a Contrary View by Constantin von Hoffmeister
In Speech to Europeans, Vance Signals Support for Far-Right Parties
Vice President JD Vance scolded an audience in Munich, saying Europe was failing to uphold democratic values. He said nothing about President Trump’s talks with Russia to end the war in Ukraine, which have stirred anxiety on the continent. —
As an anxious Europe sought clarity on President Trump’s approach to Russia and Ukraine, Vice President JD Vance instead used a speech in Munich on Friday to signal support for far-right parties, including Alternative for Germany, or AfD, which Moscow has backed through misinformation campaigns.
Addressing European leaders at the Munich Security Conference, Mr. Vance scolded them for not sufficiently upholding democratic values — an accusation many of them have leveled at the Trump administration — and offered what amounted to White House political backing for Europe’s far right. He urged the Europeans to end their opposition to anti-immigration parties such as the AfD, parts of which have been classified as extremist by German intelligence, and said the effort to marginalize them and their radical ideas amounted to antidemocratic action.
Mr. Vance called the parties a legitimate expression of the will of voters angered by high levels of migration over the last decade. His words would appear to play into the hands of Russia, which researchers say is behind a torrent of disinformation that has flooded Germany ahead of a federal election this month.
Much of that campaign appears aimed at undermining trust in mainstream parties and bolstering the AfD. Elon Musk, Mr. Trump’s most high-profile adviser, has also supported AfD with posts on X, aligning with Russia’s strategic objective to destabilize Western democracies and support for Ukraine.
Mr. Vance did not mention Ukraine in his speech, despite the high tension in Europe over President Trump’s approach to ending the war, and as an explosion at the former nuclear plant at Chernobyl on Friday illustrated the continued dangers of the conflict.
Mr. Vance earlier met with European leaders who have expressed worries about Mr. Trump’s confrontational attitude toward trans-Atlantic allies, including his demand that they spend more on defense. Those fears have multiplied since Mr. Trump’s phone call with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia earlier this week, when he demonstrated an apparent willingness to offer concessions that Ukraine considers unacceptable, including giving up some of its territory.
… Continues
A Contrary View: Constantin von Hoffmeister
Vance, the herald of the new Imperium Americanum, speaks in blunt tones: mass migration is a weapon; progressivism is a death cult; censorship is the final gasp of a ruling class that knows it has lost the war for legitimacy. The European elites, those bloodless technocrats who wield words like “disinformation” as a cudgel against the awakening masses, are the heirs of the Soviet commissars they once reviled. The irony is thick, choking, like the smog over the factories of the Ruhr. Vance and Trump declare that the game is over. The illusion of unity is shattered; the real Europe — the Europe of sovereignty, of ethnocultural vitality, of an unbroken lineage stretching back to Charlemagne — stirs in her slumber.
JD Vance enters Munich like a Viking berserker in the heart of the Carolingian Empire, a man from the land of strip malls and cornfields standing before the decaying architecture of European self-delusion. He does not ask for an audience with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, because why negotiate with a ghost? A specter, soon to be forgotten, entombed within his own failed Zeitenwende, the epochal shift that never shifted. The Americans, brash and uncaring, march forward; they see no need for polite fictions. “We don’t need to see him; he won’t be chancellor long.” The brutality of truth, spoken without the diplomatic perfume that once masked the rotting corpse of Western liberalism.
Friedrich Merz, the Christian Democratic chancellor candidate in the upcoming election (February 23) and an apostle of managed decline, stands at the pulpit, trembling in the face of the new crusade. “A brutally tough message is coming,” he warns. Munich, the old city where deals were made and falsehoods brokered, will host a confrontation instead. The Americans are no longer selling security blankets and fairy tales; they are demanding a reckoning. Europe, that withered lion that still imagines herself the arbiter of moral order, will be told: halt the migration tide, recognize the uprising, and admit that the people — the real people, the Volk — are not to be feared but heeded.
Vance, the herald of the new Imperium Americanum, speaks in blunt tones: mass migration is a weapon; progressivism is a death cult; censorship is the final gasp of a ruling class that knows it has lost the war for legitimacy. The European elites, those bloodless technocrats who wield words like “disinformation” as a cudgel against the awakening masses, are the heirs of the Soviet commissars they once reviled. The irony is thick, choking, like the smog over the factories of the Ruhr. Vance and Trump declare that the game is over. The illusion of unity is shattered; the real Europe — the Europe of sovereignty, of ethnocultural vitality, of an unbroken lineage stretching back to Charlemagne — stirs in her slumber.
Merz calls it a turning point, but he misreads the wave. It is not the liberalized conservative “turning point” of orderly transition and measured rhetoric. It is an eschatological rupture, an epochal sundering. The dam is breaking, and the old order is desperate to patch its cracks with empty slogans and false pieties. But no amount of ink in the pages of the Frankfurter Allgemeine will hold back the surge. The people see through the sham.
In Munich, a new alignment is spoken into existence. The Americans, with their raw candor, are pushing a simple truth: the days of consensus are over. Vance does not plead, nor does he posture. He demands. He demands that Europe wake up, that she take her own side in the battle for her soul, that she reject the death spiral of mass immigration and the imposed morality of an exhausted liberalism. He says to Germany: stop fearing your own people. Stop treating them like dangerous children to be controlled and silenced. Listen to them. Work with them. Even the AfD, the pariah, must be heard. Censorship is the last refuge of the weak.
This is not a conference. This is not a debate. This is the moment when the mask slips and the battle lines are drawn. Vance, the hammer of the new era, makes it clear: America is no longer the enforcer of European delusions. The order of the past is crumbling, and in its place, something harder, something truer, something real is emerging.
The Munich Security Conference will not be the same again. The age of illusions is over. The great confrontation has begun.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/us-intelligence-report-suggests-israel-trying-drag-trump-preemptive-attack-iran
The Zerohedge photo shows a nuclear power plant built by Germans. As is well known, the destroyers shut down all German nuclear power plants in order to ruin Germany.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bushehr_Nuclear_Power_Plant
“The Baltic peoples, particularly those in Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia, are genetically unique due to their remarkable continuity since the Ice Age, retaining some of the best-preserved genetic traits of ancient hunter-gatherers.
This genetic stability, combined with minimal admixture from neighboring populations, may also explain why they are among the blondest and most blue-eyed populations in the world. These traits, linked to genes like MC1R (hair color) and OCA2/HERC2 (eye color), likely evolved under low UV conditions in Northern Europe to aid vitamin D synthesis.
An older theory, known as the ‘salmon argument,’ attempted to locate the Proto-Indo-European homeland based on shared words for ‘salmon’ in Indo-European languages. It suggested that the Indo-Europeans originated in regions where Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) were found, such as around the Baltic Sea.
However, this theory was later debunked when it was discovered that the word likely referred to other fish species (e.g., trout) found near the Black and Caspian Seas. While linguistically intriguing, the salmon argument is no longer considered valid.
Nonetheless, modern research continues to highlight the Baltic region as a fascinating case study for understanding human evolution, genetics, and cultural history. It bridges ancient hunter-gatherer ancestry with unique linguistic and genetic traits that persist to this day.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salmon_problem
Jew? https://de.zxc.wiki/wiki/John_Loewenthal
“The usual conspiratorial rantings” https://archive.is/eBWn8
So that it doesn’t get too long, here is just an excerpt from the book by a Curt Herrmann called “The Jew and the German Mensch” from 1936. The quoted “Stoltheim” was actually the “cover name” of Hans F. K. Günther in the Weimar Judenrepublik (who would have had his birthday in two days). Drawing of “Race Günther” by Wolfgang Willrich:
https://i.ibb.co/fdTgryBk/Willrich-Guenther-1930.jpg
Willrich apparently also had several “Ame-
ricans” among his large circle of relatives.
https://de.zxc.wiki/wiki/Willrich_(Familie)
Excerpt from the “rantings”:
In his book “The Enigma of Jewish Success”, Stoltheim tells a characteristic story: a wealthy landowner’s widow, who had dismissed her servant, offered his livery for sale in the newspaper. A Jew turned up, inspected the item and quoted a rather high price.
The woman then brought in some of her deceased husband’s clothes. The Jew explained that he would also buy these and agreed to pay a reasonable price. The woman was delighted to get rid of the things she no longer had any use for at a good price and kept bringing in more.
Only one valuable summer suit, which the owner had only worn once, found no favor with the retailer. “You don’t wear that anymore, it’s no longer fashionable.” In the end, he offered 5 marks. As the other clothes had fetched such good prices, the lady finally let him keep the suit.
When the Jew packed everything up and wrote it down, he ended up with 200 marks. He explained politely: “I wasn’t expecting such a large purchase, I don’t have that much money with me. But I’ll have the clothes picked up and send you the money with the messenger. To make the purchase valid, I’ll make a down payment of 5 marks.”
Halfway through leaving, he said: “I’ll take the summer suit with me so I don’t go away empty-handed.” He left – and the lady is still waiting to collect the items today.
This story is striking proof of Jewish cunning. The Jew was able to set decent prices on the clothes the lady was offering without hesitation. He only pretended to want to buy the items in order to mislead the saleswoman.
But the summer suit, the only item that seemed worth buying, he presented as worthless and gave no indication that he was interested in buying it. So he got it for a ridiculously cheap price. And the whole deal was so cleverly arranged that it can hardly be challenged from a legal point of view.
The same Jewish trick of behaving as if the buyer had no interest in the goods can be seen from the following incident: A cattle dealer knew that a farmer had to make an interest payment but had no money in his house. The Jew appeared on the farm, talked amiably about this and that and finally asked if the farmer would not let him have a strong plow horse. (But he knew very well that the farmer couldn’t spare a horse).
On the other hand, the farmer offered the cattle dealer an ox and two calves. The Jew shrugged his shoulders pitifully and said: “Cattle? I have cattle here and there that I unfortunately bought. Prices have fallen and are still falling. I’m losing my money in the process. Buy the cattle from me and I’ll give them to you for half their value. You’ll earn and I won’t lose as much.”
The poor farmer, who was threatened with seizure, begged and implored the Jew to take his cattle off his hands, and “out of pure pity” the Jew bought what was on offer for a pittance.
A trick often practised on the stock exchange is to spread the rumor that a stock company, e.g. a machine factory, is about to collapse. As a result, the shares, which previously stood at more than a hundred, fall in price, soon they are only worth 95, 90, 80, 70%.
Now a bank buys up these shares through backers – they are called Chawrusses in Hebrew – in Hamburg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Breslau. Inconspicuously, in small quantities, secretly. The bank soon owns almost all of Finna’s shares.
Several weeks pass. Then the stock exchange journals publish a small note: “The difficulties of the machine factory seem to have been resolved.” Some time later, the news appears: “The factory has received large orders from abroad.”
The shares rise again. The news becomes more and more favorable, the shares rise higher and higher. And when the favorable level is reached, the bank sells small quantities here and there until everything is sold off again. And the result?
It was similar with grain, wool, cotton, sugar, furs and so on. Goods were made scarce by buying them for millions. Prices rose disproportionately high. And then these hoarded stocks were sold at a huge profit. The blow that London’s Rothschild struck against England is also well known.
He attended the Battle of Belle-Alliance (1815) as a battle-hawk. When he saw that Napoleon’s star was sinking, he hurried to London in a speedboat and spread the word that Napoleon had won. As a result, English government securities fell alarmingly. Those who owned any sold them at any price.
Rothschild, however, had them bought up by his Chawrusses, and when the news came to London three days later that Wellington had won, share prices soared again. Many people were ruined, but Rothschild had “earned” millions.
Another Jewish invention was the department store, which destroyed thousands of individual stores. You can buy everything there, from shirt buttons to complete home furnishings. And everything is – or appears to be – far cheaper than in the small stores.
How is this possible? The department store palace, the often outstandingly artistic interior design, the lavish lighting, the passenger elevators and escalators cost huge sums of money that have to be earned. And after all, the department store also wants to make a profit.
Well, the big corporations (i.e. groups of millionaire men) run dozens of department stores in the big cities. They buy all the goods in huge quantities. In doing so, they demand and receive significant discounts that are never granted to retailers.
In order to obtain the large orders, the manufacturers also deliver at the lowest possible prices. Many items also have to be made to order. The apron fabric is woven from low-grade cotton, the velvet is made 5 centimetres narrower in width, the canned vegetables are packed more loosely, yarn and twisted threads are considerably shorter, and the lengths are not given in meters but in yards to make checking more difficult.
Even the Vienna sausages are a little lighter. The smaller items are often sold at cost price, even at a loss. They act as a lure. The buyer thinks that if he can get sewing needles, sockets and jars so cheaply, he can safely buy a coat or a carpet here.
However, such items are no cheaper than in a specialist store. Even larger pieces are often displayed in the shop window at very low prices as a lure. Unfortunately, they are usually only available in one piece, or you are told that the item has already been sold. If, for example, books are on sale in department stores for far less than their original price, it is because the company has bought up the remaining print run from publishers who urgently need money or from bankrupt bookshops.
However, these are always exceptions. The department stores are obliged to charge the same prices for new books as the booksellers. It is also easy to get the wrong idea from the price labels. If you see that something costs 95 or 98 pfennigs, you think it is actually worth 1 mark, the department store is just selling it cheaper. But perhaps you can get the same item elsewhere for 80 pfennigs.
As a result, you can probably get small items here and there cheaper in the department store. But if you do all your shopping in the department store, you will certainly not come off any better. In any case, he is acting un-German. Because he is taking his money to the Jews and thereby harming fellow Germans.
Perhaps in the future the department stores will be remodeled so that there will be room for 30, 40 or more German stores. Then one could shop comfortably without violating one’s duty to one’s people. A law ordering the gradual conversion of department stores into individual stores would be desirable.
The cash-and-carry stores, which are mostly in Jewish hands, are also a cancer. They count on the poverty, carelessness and stupidity of buyers. The convenience of paying in installments entices many people to buy things they could easily do without. Most of them also do not consider that a home furnishing whose installment payment extends over years must necessarily be more expensive.
The worst thing happens, however, if the buyer cannot continue to make the payments due to illness, unemployment, etc., because then the businessman has the right under the purchase contract to reclaim the purchased items. However, the amounts paid are lost. Hopefully, department stores and installment sales will soon disappear completely in the Third Reich.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Chawer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barmat_scandal
Obviously I made a mistake, the book was not by Günther, but by Fritsch, never mind.
https://archive.org/details/fritsch-theodor-the-riddle-of-the-jews-success-1927/mode/2up
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/would-it-be-possible-that-the-aXqVit4hS82w6FEJjMiHfg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_official_adoptions_of_Christianity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wd2tITr9Tvg
The origin of the Indo-European speakers is a matter of on-going objective research. Incidentally, the ancient rotary swastika symbol seems originally to have a polar origin and became a solar sign as northern peoples moved south; it is extraordinary that people who should know better have asserted that Hitler turned it round the wrong (malevolent) way, when his offence was simply to claim it as a specifically anti-Jewish symbol.
Hans Guenther was an erudite researcher, but had an excessive Nordic bias not shared by other German anthropologists, or for that matter Hitler himself.
I find the sauvastika (swastika turned to the left) to be upside down. Both versions can be found far and wide. You can read a lot into it: Are they moving legs? Or even an excavator shovel? hard to say. One thing is certain, it is the sun. After all, there is also left- and right- turning yogurt. All discussion about it is about as substantial as that. Sometimes we have to turn left, sometimes right. But perhaps turning right is occultist, even demonic?
So we can still turn left (and drive in circles). Although everything left-wing is considered demonic (sinister/sinistra means left). Therefore, the right hand is (normally) our working hand, but it is controlled by the left hemisphere of the brain. In German “links” (left), “linken” means to deceive someone, “linkisch” means (characterly) falsehood. Right (rechts) means right (rechtens), righteous (rechtschaffend), correct (richtig).
PS: What means “Nordic bias”? Should he have had a better Ibero-Slavic bias? Hitler, of all people, is supposed to have rejected him for this, like other anthropologists of his time? Extremely difficult to believe, what sources are you referring to or relying on?
If we take Hitler’s choice of symbol as a model, the sun actually rotates to the left and not to the right, because the tails that follow its rotation point to the right. I don’t know what he was thinking, but I suspect little more profound than that. Wasn’t it a symbol he saw above the entrance to an abbey when he was a boy? In any case, the reverse version can also be seen on the back of Nazi flags, so there seems to have been no ban on the reverse version. The Hitler version was probably also official in Finland, allegedly even before Hitler.
However, it is highly questionable whether it was an original Germanic symbol at all; I dispute this. Perhaps Hitler was not a Germanologist at all, but in reality just a deranged swastologist? Who knows (at least I don’t!). People will probably still be racking their brains over this 1000 years from now. The symbol is supposed to testify to anti-Semitism, although it was also found in “Israel”. Symbols are signals, but signals are not necessarily symbols. Just as ideas are thoughts, but thoughts are not necessarily ideas. So, now we’re all a bit smarter than before.
Perhaps the South Pole is in fact the North Pole, and we are not standing “on top of the earth”, but are “stuck” to the earth below? Are we upside down without knowing it? Perhaps our left hand is really our right hand? Left-wing fascism and right-wing Marxism.
The more order is destroyed, the more confusion arises. What is order anyway, who establishes it and by what right? Why did the Jew know how to make us believe that a printed paper bill has any “value” beyond the cost of production and materials?
So the world consists of certain established systems of order which, for whatever reason, have proved to be practical and have prevailed. Since our origins, it has been established that there are two sexes who are “gravitationally” attracted to each other.
Now there are countless “genders” (as many as molecules in the universe). We have been persuaded to pay a lot of money to save the world from “global warming”. Thanks to one scientist’s clever idea, we have finally managed to remedy the situation.
https://boingboing.net/2025/02/12/heres-a-plan-to-detonate-the-worlds-largest-h-bomb-to-end-global-warming-what-could-go-wrong.html
Perhaps we should write and read from right to left like the Jews, or drive on the left side of the road like the British, Australians and Japanese. Everything else is practically unworkable and should therefore be discarded! It’s about creating real “progress” here – a revolution of enormous proportions is needed to finally shake the world awake! And this “progress” is of course led by Jews, because only Jews know what true “certified” bullshit contains and means, and only they are able to interpret it correctly and accurately! Is that so hard to understand, damn it!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South-up_map_orientation
In space, some familiar categories and laws of nature (such as gravity) are indeed suspended. There is no up or down, you simply float. However, this is a physical strain that results in muscle atrophy, atrophy of the bone marrow and a permanent accumulation of blood in the upper extremities, i.e. a completely artificial state, alien to life.
But if we look at our earth, it seems to require an order after all, such as the polarity of the earth’s magnetic field, which regulates the ocean currents. Or schools of fish and bird migrations that follow a geodetic sequence, otherwise they would be life-threatening for the population. Something like this can and must have been of decisive importance for the evolution of mankind.
For me, the swastika is two intertwined sigrunes. So it makes “Germanic” sense. The other way around would be wrong. Emma Watson (recently appointed leader of British Womanhood) is currently giving an hour-long speech quoting from Mein Kampf. https://ftjmedia.com/live/0/FLOOD/1
PS: If you cross two Eihwaz runes, you get a swastika with the arms tilted to the right (just like the two Sowilō runes according to Elder Futhark). I therefore suspect the reason for the choice of the “hooked cross”, with its arms pointing to the right, to lie in this primeval Germanic design.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sowil%C5%8D_(rune)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eihwaz
But I would like to put forward another argument for clarification: If so many millions of my German ancestors (and also countless other European contemporaries) felt this symbol to be quasi “holy”, then I completely reject any two of them trying to persuade us that it is “unholy”! My ancestors were very reliable and well-educated people who I will not allow to be defiled!
They would never have allowed anything that was in any way disreputable or offensive (or even “demonic” or “satanic”), and they all came from a deeply European spiritual tradition. Apart from that, they were all baptized Christians in centuries-old churches!
So if the “Satan” (a Hebrew term for the Hebrew chaos-maker and world-destroyer) had tempted Hitler to pervert the swastika into a “symbol of hell”, at least one “symbolist” out of millions of people would have had to recognize this!
Certainly not millions of well-intentioned, well-meaning and well-educated people would have sacrificed their lives in the war against the shameful, lying, murderous Jewish Bolshevism under this symbol for a “demon”! Absolutely ridiculous pseudo-argument from the Jewish lie factory a la Henry Makow & Co!
Btw., you have to realize what these creatures do to all seekers of truth in their Boshevikipedia: they defame and brand them as “conspiracy theorists”. They lump everything together, just like they lump the world together. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:American_conspiracy_theorists
Diabolo/devil/Teufel comes from the Greek and means to throw into chaos, the opposite of order. They are the instigators of chaos who divide the world and permanently set it against themselves! Not only Prof. MacDonald and Tucker Carlson can be found here.
I would like to add one last argument: Laurent Guyénot says that after thousands of years the the so-called Jewish “religion” has not changed, evolved at all, it is and remains static, armored, like a fortress (this is symbolized by their now symbol “Star of David ”, which does not contain any “movement” like the swastika) as it was in the beginning.
https://rumble.com/v6iqcja-laurent-guynot-on-disraeli-and-the-cursed-nation.html
“Consequently it was a fatal blunder of Luther, always to translate the word Jahwe as ‘Lord God’, and thus to help to obliterate the fundamental difference between the particular god of the Jews, and the ‘Heavenly Father’ of Christ.” (Theodor Fritsch in his book, page 69)
https://archive.org/details/fritsch-theodor-the-riddle-of-the-jews-success-1927/page/n69/mode/1up
“Truth Jihad” … what a f-ing idiot! Mental cripple! https://rumble.com/v6l808d-christianity-spirituality-and-guynots-marcionism-with-ed-kendrick-and-patri.html
Another attempt at an explanation is: The problem with the “hooked cross” is that it was quasi “cursed” by the Jews like the number 13, although it was originally a symbol of good luck. Now it actually attracts negativity and all kinds of crazy people.
However, this has nothing to do with the symbol itself, but solely with the charged spiritual content and “taboo”. It would first have to be fundamentally cleansed and de-tabooed in order to unfold its full joy and splendour again. One would have to tear out all the pages that the Jews have written in the book titled “Nazi”…
The production of the flags was
subject to strictest specifications.
https://archive.ph/47j8S
Incidentally, it is interesting to note that not only is the swastika a sun symbol, but the flag of the Japanese allies also placed the sun in the center. But the Celtic cross, which is nowadays used as a Nazi symbol, also contains the sun cross.
One may indeed ask oneself why Muslims do not use the energy-spending sun as the center of our star system, but a crescent moon. The moon is a dead rock that visibly reflects the sun’s light at night.
Furthermore, in contrast to the male sun, the moon has always been regarded in astrology as feminine, fickle and mood-dependent (“lunatic”). Its gravity creates the tides and menstruation. Something that contradicts Islam.
Co-operation between the “right-wing” (i.e. anti-immigration) parties across Europe, with the UK Reform party added, is a welcome start, something to build on.
Mr. von Hoffmeister’s first name is surely Constantin, not Nicholas. Perhaps KM or whoever wrote “Nicholas” was half-remembering (as was I) the old Alinskyite gadfly journalist Nicholas von Hoffman (1929–2018), who was an almost inescapable presence in print, radio, and television punditry throughout the seventies and eighties. Another coincidental connection between the two men is that one of von Hoffman’s sons is named Constantine (with a terminal -e).
2 days ago: 80th anniversary of Dresden Bombing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvCG6-Vb3WU
I am sure: For as long as you still start talking about the “evil Nazis”, you are (far from) standing on your own two feet spiritually. Rather, your “thinking” is (as intended) Jewish, colored by the specifically Jewish POV that dominates our world, i.e. somewhat to completely distorted, polarized into the negative, redirected.
The hypocrisy on Amren is extremely frustrating as they willfully omit, even actively censor, a major reason for the destruction of the West and the white race: the JQ. Of course, they are completely in the know when it comes to this issue. Unless, of course, they cover one of their eyes every time they read the right-wing/nationalist alternative press.
They are actively working on only a section of the whole truth, treating symptoms like a doctor who “treats” tooth decay (the Negro problem) but does not eliminate the permanent cause of the unhealthy diet. Of course, one could argue: “Yes, don’t you see what is NOT written there? Do they ever write about the ‘Holocaust’? Do they ever agitate against Germany or the Third Reich?” The answer to both is no.
This means that at Amren they know that the “Nazis” were not a world-destroying force, but racial nationalists. They just don’t make an issue of it so as not to tarnish their own “reputation”. But the reason for this could also simply be not to spoil it with a whole range of their readership. These people are practically sitting in their starting blocks as a subaltern form of Kosher patriotism (it cannot be described as “trenches” with such quiet caution and restraint) and would join a hardcore nationalism, an American fascism, at any time if it took over!
It is obvious that with their kosher form of nationalism a radical cleansing of America from all destructive powers and forces would never take place, and that is why Mr. Taylor is content to cede a large part of America to the Negroes and Mestizos. The main thing, he says, is that the whites get a small part of the land for themselves. Yet he himself knows best (because this man really can’t be that stupid): No Jew would ever support that! Of course, as always, “no” does not mean zero, but the absolute majority.
What role would Taylor play in such a reservation, if he lived to see his “Reich” at all? Since he doesn’t believe in Germaic warrior myths, probably some kind of administrative advisor and highly honored sage of the “first hour” (for the Nazis: Old Fighter). He would not favor or advocate restrictive anti-Jewish policies there either, but would, according to their “nature” and “biblical mandate”, provide access to subversive Jews who claim to also want to be part of the new “whites-only” society. This would mean that the same vicious circle that is already leading the West to the brink would start all over again.
And it is exactly the same in all these toothless “populist” pseudo-nationalist Kosher parties, all of which are infiltrated by Jews and more or less controlled or “administered”, as it were as the price of their limited freedom to impose patronizing self-censorship on themselves, to only ever be allowed to make half of their demands, which in truth are completely legitimate, and to bow their heads in the direction of Jerusalem and pay homage to Zion as if this were not the actual center of their destruction, but part of their “essence” (“Judeo-Christian heritage”).
A pure perversion/parody: It is extremely important to emphasize that National Socialism is NOT the absolute degenerate scum of people who perform the Hitler salute and have their bald heads tattooed with swastikas. The exact opposite is the case! (National Socialism is also not “Satanism” or similar occultist nonsense.)
These mentally ill people would all be put in a special institution for disciplinary purposes! It’s all part of the Jew system, trapping the marginalized fringe of society into expressing their protest through something “forbidden”: “They’re Nazis, look at them! Is that what you want?” This is about image destruction (“bad optics”).