Dugin: The West Is Dead — Russia and America Redraw the World Map

Dugin: The West Is Dead — Russia and America Redraw the World Map

I rather doubt this will happen:

Ukraine must belong to us and no one else. Not to Europe and not to America. At the same time, it is entirely conceivable that Canada will become the 51st state of the U.S. — we have no objections. Or that Greenland will become American — we have no objections. And even if Western Europe becomes American, we probably won’t object too much either. As Putin once said, the European elites are merely puppies wagging their tails before their American master. Well, let them wag — it is ultimately of no concern to us. But Ukraine, Belarus, the Baltics, and part of Eastern Europe definitively belong to us in the new map of global redistribution. There are no questions about this.

It is remarkable that President Putin and President Trump have finally spoken over the phone. This is a true breakthrough because the leaders of two great powers have initiated a dialogue. Naturally, the issues they discussed pertained to the global order. It is not fitting for the leaders of two great powers to speak of minor matters without first defining new parameters for the world order.

From Conservative Revolution to the Redistribution of the World

The fact is that a genuine conservative revolution has taken place in the West. Trump and his allies have radically altered the course of the collective West by 180 degrees. Moreover, the collective West as an entity simply no longer exists. Instead, there are now the United States — Great America — which has become great in the short period of Trump’s tenure, and, for the time being, there is still liberal, globalist Europe. But this is a regrettable misunderstanding; Europe must be brought in line with the broader multipolar model to which both Trump and Putin agree. As do Xi Jinping, the great ruler of Great China, and Modi, the great ruler of Great India. Therefore, Europe must either become great, or it will cease to exist altogether, and we will forget about it.

Today’s conversation between the two architects of the new world order carries immense significance. At the same time, Putin’s Russia remains unchanged, remaining the same as before. In fact, in a certain sense, it becomes a role model for the new Great America. Essentially, we are now moving in the same direction; only the Americans are doing so swiftly, with their characteristic brilliance, while we proceed gradually and carefully. Accordingly, I believe that the foreseeable future of the modern world is an alliance between Putin’s Russia and Trump’s America. However, before that happens, the most critical contentious issue must be resolved — the question of Ukraine.

Ukraine Is Ours. Period

Ukraine must belong to us and no one else. Not to Europe and not to America. At the same time, it is entirely conceivable that Canada will become the 51st state of the U.S. — we have no objections. Or that Greenland will become American — we have no objections. And even if Western Europe becomes American, we probably won’t object too much either. As Putin once said, the European elites are merely puppies wagging their tails before their American master. Well, let them wag — it is ultimately of no concern to us. But Ukraine, Belarus, the Baltics, and part of Eastern Europe definitively belong to us in the new map of global redistribution. There are no questions about this.

As for the Middle East, Russia is taking a course towards establishing a union state with Iran. In this regard, we indeed find ourselves in contradiction with the United States. So what? It’s not a big deal. Yes, the Russia-Iran Union State will oppose the U.S.-Israel alliance. But in the end, we will inevitably find common formulas for a truce and zones of mutual influence in this confrontation.

Ukraine, however, should play no role in this equation whatsoever. Ukraine is ours — a part of Russia, period. Belarus is our ally, period. Iran is our union state, period. From there, we will construct a more nuanced balance of relations. And if Europe ceases to exist as a subject, then that is their own doing — they brought it upon themselves. I repeat: either Europe will be great, or it will simply cease to exist altogether.

18 replies
  1. Shitting Bull
    Shitting Bull says:

    The utter menace of Duginism to European unity and white-western demographic survival now becomes clear. The unhealthy embrace of Muscovite quasi-Stalinist imperialism by single-issue obsessive antisemites is a dangerously myopic by-product. You do not have to be a supporter of AIPAC, WZO and Mafdal to see the oddity in a proposed Pezeshkian-Putin nuclear alliance and a danger to the English, French, Germans, Scandinavians, Italians, Spanish and Hungarians if it ever succeeded.

  2. Pierre de Craon
    Pierre de Craon says:

    Are Dugin’s predictions farsighted or simply grandiose? Either way, they are premature. Trump is far too wild a card player to make forecasting his actions a safe bet, nor is he in a position to impose an a posteriori modus vivendi on a future warmongering Democratic administration.

    Nonetheless, I do hope that Dugin is right with respect to what works out between Russia and Iran. A confirmed guarantee of Russian protection for Iran might well be the only thing that can restrain the Jews’ psychotic designs for a “greater Israel” wherein the limitless indulgence in the shedding of Amalek’s blood is applauded by a perpetually accommodating (((USA))).

    • English Patriot
      English Patriot says:

      Is it really in the interest of white people from Quebec to Queensland, Ulster to Estonia, to welcome an aggressive Muscovite transition from Stalin’s materialism to Kirill’s mysticism?

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        Your question rhetorically advances a group of unsupported assumptions as if they were established facts. In short, you beg the question.

        • English Patriot
          English Patriot says:

          @ Pierre Pedant et Pompeux

          Factual support: [1] Mark Galeotti, “Forged in War: A Military History of Russia” (2024); [2] Catherine Belton, “Putin’s People” (2021); [3] Paul Elie, The New Yorker, March 12, 2022; [4] Michael Meng, “Dugin’s Apocalypticism,” SEET, February 12, 2025.
          It is not necessary to embrace Dugin’s latest theories, or Orthodox Christianity, to condemn sex perversion, wokery and vice.

        • Arnold Bannerman
          Arnold Bannerman says:

          Pierre de Craon should re-read Dugin’s explicit claim that the “Baltics” (Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania) and “part of eastern Europe” (Poland? Moldovia? Slovakia? &c?) “belong” to Russia, along with all Ukraine. Not every acquisitions is even Slavic. Europeans are hardly unreasonable to oppose such a take-over.
          Before accusing anyone critical of Aleksander Dugin, President Putin and Patriarch Kirill of “unsupported assumptions”, perhaps M. de Craon could list the books by the Great Russian “philosopher” he has himself studied, and provide his own evaluation of their varied contents.
          He might also consider Putin’s meetings with Netanyahu and Roman Abramovich, and his mafia links.
          Looking back at his previous posts, I get the impression that Monsieur is some kind of Christian, in which case to talk about “assumptions” as “facts” is a shade ironic.
          On Europe-Russia differences, the studies by the Roman Catholic historian Oskar Halecki are more valuable then ever.

          • Pierre de Craon
            Pierre de Craon says:

            … I get the impression that Monsieur is some kind of Christian …

            Other folks don’t require as much close reading as you evidently do to spot what was never concealed.

            Now it’s Arnold Bannerman, is it? Well, plonk in a new bottle and with a fancy new name is still plonk, “Arnold” [wink, wink].

  3. Me
    Me says:

    Dugin is just a lunatic, post(?)-soviet, russian imperialist, who doesn’t care a bit about white interests. He was never pro-white, in fact he made many statements that are openly anti-white. He is a trojan horse of (((globalism))) on the right.

  4. Emma Smith
    Emma Smith says:

    Preventing an Israeli Empire is one important thing.
    Welcoming a Russian Empire is another and no solution.
    Dugin must drop his fantasies and analyse ALL the likely geostrategic factors in the world, while recognising along with Peter the Great, Catherine the Great and Nicholas II, the merits of European civilization. Better a Solzhenitsyn than a Gumilyov. Better a white union from the Atlantic to the Urals than a Slav-Mongol hybrid with Shia allies.
    Europe does not have to become a family-hating money-obsessed cosmopolitan jumble: remember fascism.

  5. English Patriot
    English Patriot says:

    The London “Daily Mail”, February 20, has published an article by Dominic Midgley presenting evidence that Russia has a financial corruption and sexual blackmail hold over the POTUS. Who is the Jewish puppet, Zelensky or Trump, or both, or neither? There are a few more things on earth than in the antisemitism philosophy.

Comments are closed.