Who the hell was running the country during Joe’s obvious dementia?

Biden didn’t know what he was doing for at least his last year or two as president, and he was a dumb ass to begin with. So who the hell was running the country? I heard speculation that it was Anthony Blinken. Maybe Hunter. Maybe Chief of Staff Jeff Zients? Someone in the Biden White House could make a lot of money by giving a first-person account of what was going on. They should all have to testify.
The one part of his brain that was functional was whatever controls his narcissism—far too typical of politicians everywhere. Insisting on running again was absurd. I suspect his staff realized Trump would clobber him in the debates so they arranged an early debate. Resulting the Kamala disaster.

Trump DOJ Urged To Investigate Whether Biden’s Staff Exploited His Mental State To Push ‘Far-Left’ Policies

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey is urging the Department of Justice (DOJ) to investigate whether former President Joe Biden’s staff exploited his mental decline to implement far-left policies, according to a letter obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Biden’s executive actions — including last-minute clemency grants to violent criminals and sentence commutations for death row inmates — are “legally void” if he did not give his knowing approval, Bailey wrote Tuesday in a letter to DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz.

12 replies
  1. Tim
    Tim says:

    Aryan beast without slit eyes? I’m currently reading the bizarre story of a German nobleman who was the last Khan of Mongolia. A kind of General Custer [who was also German] of the East. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_von_Ungern-Sternberg

    There are still many myths about him today, even in Mongolia. He is said to have mercilessly slaughtered rows of Bolsheviks and Jews [which is synonymous], oh evil crime, but then fell victim to them himself. https://l*nkmix.co/35310027 (book downloads, vids etc.)

    *) = i

    It was said of him that in the Middle Ages he would have been a great warlord and conqueror, but in the 20th century, just like Hitler, he had “fallen out of time” and could only fail in the end.

    He is said to have been cruel to himself, but above all to subordinates who disobeyed his orders. However, due to his Buddhist belief in reincarnation, he also promoted all the weak to death in order to improve their karma for the next life. The only weapon he carried with him at all times was a bamboo whip.

    Himmler and Rosenberg are also said to have raved about him. Among “fascist Eurasians” he is said to be increasingly revered as a hero, although Putin’s post-communist regime even prosecutes the mere use of the swastika by neo-pagans. https://archive.ph/WU9r4

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavic_Native_Faith

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavic_Native_Faith

    • Emma Smith
      Emma Smith says:

      The Rodnovers are an interesting group, but represent an artificial pseudo-revival of an imagined ancient faith, comparable to the witch-cult revival in Britain. The swastika as an ancient cosmological symbol originating in the rotation around the Pole Star, that later became a sun-sign, was benign among the northern peoples, especially the Aryans. Because Hitler designed it as specifically anti-Jewish its western use has been either illegal or taboo. The Jains still use it unperturbed. The Hakenkreuz is nevertheless the most impressive of all political emblems, though the Red Cross of St George and the Hammer & Sickle run close.
      As for Sternberg, he was a crazed sadist like Assurbanipal or Shiro Ishii, and I doubt if he was considered an heroic exemplar by Rosenberg or even Himmler – evidence welcome.

      • Tim
        Tim says:

        I do very “ungern” your research work (btw., some of this it’s in the provided the link list) gracious Emma, but you may have to disprove whether this is “evidence” by providing counter-argumentative proof.: “The relationship between the genre and fascism was unconsciously expressed early on: One of Ossendowski’s biggest fans was Heinrich Himmler; fascinated by Central Asian mysticism, he organized several Tibet expeditions, which were probably also unofficially intended to search for Agarthi or Shambala. An article by Julius Evola from 1973 also describes the fascist cult around Ungern, based on Ossendowski’s book.”

        Reichsleiter Alfred Rosenberg, like Ungern-Sternberg an Estonian and anti-Semite and an important Nazi ideologue, described the Baron as “the ideal Aryan”, notes Professor Mikhalev, and portrayed Ungern as “the first leader of a new type, the first Nazi”. Allegedly, Rosenberg dedicated a play to Ungern that ran in German theaters in the 1930s. “According to our hypothesis, the reason lies in the fact that Ungern’s cult – in contrast to those around Kolchak or Krasnov – originated in Nazi Germany in the 1930s. Today’s imperialists and the extreme right reproduce old ideological patterns and myths in new contexts. The Ungern myth is being used to consolidate various political forces.”

        https://www.dict.cc/deutsch-englisch/ungern.html

        • Emma Smith
          Emma Smith says:

          @Tim
          Thank you for your information.
          I presume Rosenberg’s dedication was an introduction to Krauthoff’s fictionalized eulogy which I have not seen, and must be set against Rosenberg’s published sentiments on love.
          Himmler had an interest in aspects of occultism, though his SS researchers warned against Evola. The only book marginally relevant in my library is Heather Pringle’s “Master Plan”, and it
          is quite some time since I looked into Ossendowski, Serrano, Gorsleben, Tibetan Masters, Agartha, Crowley, and all that stuff; but time permitting I may look into it again. You will know Goodrick-Clarke’s books, which I think pretty good, and James Webb’s, less so.
          There is a lot of nonsense out there, e.g. Hitler as a Black Magician with Jewish children as the Great Sacrifice to Satan.
          I would welcome opinions on two marginal books on “Our Beloved Leader” – [i] Cornish, “The Jew of Linz”; & [ii] Sage, “Ibsen and Hitler”.
          None of this tells us who was really running the USA during Biden, or before Biden, or since Biden. But then we “know” that already, don’t we?
          What we don’t “know” (for certain) is whether Vladimir has the “goods” on his puppet Donald, and why Russians deliberately funnel Africans into Europe.

  2. Tim
    Tim says:

    Just discovered their stream, seems
    to be a very interesting topic again.
    https://odysee.com/@WarStrike:a/Episode84:ad

    I know the statement they just discussed
    on from Prussian Field Marshal Helmuth Karl
    Bernhard von Moltke (1800-1891), but it was
    not about “arrogance” as a character trait. It
    describes a classification of officers based on
    their qualities, roughly translated as follows:

    Smart and diligent: Suitable for high leadership positions.

    Smart and lazy: Suitable for advisory or strategic roles.

    Stupid and lazy: Can be assigned simple tasks.

    Stupid and diligent: Dangerous, as they cause harm, and should therefore be removed.

    This classification is frequently quoted as a practical
    guideline for assessing leadership qualities, though
    its exact origin remains somewhat unclear and is
    sometimes attributed to other military leaders.

  3. Harald
    Harald says:

    In principle, this can be summarized in a nutshell: The sheer unprecedented wealth of power of the Jews is largely based on the ridiculous fact that the Goyim do not even know what the word Goy means. But the Jews know it very well. One could therefore speak here of a kind of unscrupulously exploited knowledge advantage.

  4. Pierre de Craon
    Pierre de Craon says:

    Biden didn’t know what he was doing for at least his last year or two as president, and he was a dumb ass to begin with. So who the hell was running the country?

    Kevin is his usual plainspoken self in characterizing the puzzlement felt by everyone in the country who didn’t fear being condemned as treasonous or as an agent of Putin by the “New York Times” and the rest of the Establishment’s mass media apparatus. I know for a fact, however, that many people already considered Biden mentally incompetent prior to the 2020 election.

    In August 2020, I was having a waiting-room chat with the professional partner of a doctor I was seeing. He was expressing his misgivings about both candidates. “Why aren’t Trump voters bothered by the fact that he might be the fattest president since William Howard Taft? It’s amazing that a man that obese is still alive!” Not wanting to get into a discussion in that particular venue, I simply said,”Well, Biden has issues of his own, too, wouldn’t you say?” The doctor replied, “He certainly does. He’s plainly non compos mentis, and at least half the time, he has no idea where he is or to whom he’s speaking. I wonder what drug he’s getting? Maybe it’s Abilify. For two days, it makes you jump around like the Energizer bunny, and then you get that scared and depressed look, as if you’re about to cry. That’s Biden.”

    Back in the sixties, the Democrats pressured one of their favorite middle-of-the-road senators, Estes Kefauver, to draft what is now the 25th Amendment. The pretense was that, in the wake of the JFK assassination, they were worrying about the legitimacy of succession if a president were injured or had a stroke in office. It was all a lie, of course. Their only real worry was about an assassination that might take out so many lives that a Republican would succeed to the presidency. The Democrats never showed any concern about transfer of power when Edith Wilson served as de facto president during Woodrow’s last two vegetative years in office. Nor were they concerned about FDR’s state of mind and body when he campaigned unseen by the public for a fourth term in 1944, with the “New York Times” and all the radio networks declaring him as fit as a fiddle and occasionally accusing Tom Dewey of treason for suggesting otherwise.

    Eisenhower’s second-term heart attack caused the entire US media to have another attack of the vapors, of course, but before they got around to demanding his resignation in favor of Sam Rayburn, Ike was back in the Oval Office and holding a press conference.

    Concerns about mental fitness in a president arose again only when it became clear to the whole world that Jimmy Carter was going to be sent back to Georgia in a landslide. The threat to freedom and democracy represented by Ronald Reagan reminded the press of its patriotic duty to protect the country from a mentally unstable chief executive. Even Joe Biden, then as now sharp as a tack, was concerned about Reagan’s sanity. Somehow the nation survived.

    Happily for the Times, Bill and Hillary Clinton were genius-level coke-sniffers, George and Laura Bush were stupid but knew how to obey (((orders))), and Barack and Michael Obama had the special gifts of mental health that Mother Gaia gives only to faggots and trannies. When Trump came into office in 2016, there were so many charges being made against him that no one saw any point in fretting about the obvious insanity of his marrying so many bizarre-looking women.

    When the graveyards of the USA emptied to elect Biden and Kamala in 2020, however, anyone who thought about questioning the chief idiot’s mental competency realized that J6-style punishment might well await him. The obvious question is why no one on Kamala’s team ever raised the issue. Who was in a better position to have the goods on President Depends than she? Perhaps we should just assume that the goods Biden’s Jews have on Kamala make for a stronger hand than the goods Kamala’s Jews have on Biden.

    My own question about who, singular or plural, functioned as Biden’s brain for four years isn’t about his, her, or their specific identity or identities. Rather it is about how long it will be before the very act of asking the question is deemed a criminal act of anti-Semitism.

    • Emma Smith
      Emma Smith says:

      @ M. De Craon
      Will the criminalisation of questions deemed anti-Semitic, presumably through a “hate-speech” constitutional amendment, plus judicial activism and media pressure, be likely during the Trump vice-regency on orders of Emperor Bibi, or later, do you think?

Comments are closed.