Adulating “Adolescence”: Lie-Loving Leftists Are Morally Masturbating over Anti-White Agitprop

What a gift to leftists! For days, they’ve been adulating a television fantasy called Adolescence. In leftist eyes, the show fearlessly confronts misogynist murder and the horrific threat posed to women and girls by toxic masculinity. And in the midst of their hosannas, as though God Zirself wanted to join the fight for females, reality provided a perfect example of misogynist murder and toxic masculinity. A sickening story about precisely those things hit the headlines. The parallels were deeply disturbing. In the fantasy, a misogynist schoolboy stabbed a girl to death — a girl whose only “crime” was to bully him by calling him an incel on social media. In the reality, a “dual heritage” misogynist student killed an innocent woman[1] “in a frenzied stabbing,” as the fiercely feminist BBC put it. The fiercely feminist Guardian noted that the student had “a fascination for knives and a ‘rage’ against women.” Even more horrifically, the Guardian went on, “he may have taken sexual pleasure in the killing. [Awaiting trial in prison], he asked a female officer if the killing was making headlines and then masturbated in front of her.” 

No parallels drawn 

So did the BBC, the Guardian and the rest of the leftist media draw the obvious parallels between fantasy and reality? Did they underline how the case made by Adolescence had been horrifically confirmed by news from real life? No, they didn’t. And they never will. This is because reality didn’t in fact confirm Adolescence. On the contrary, it exposed Adolescence as a giant leftist lie. The villain in the TV fantasy was a White male called Jamie Miller, which is a very English name. But the villain in the real murder-story was a non-White male called Nasen Saadi, which is not an English name at all:

A criminology student with a fascination for knives and a “rage” against women who stabbed a mother to death on a Dorset beach has been jailed for life with a minimum term of 39 years. Nasen Saadi, 21, spent months plotting the attack and questioning university lecturers about how a killer would get away with murder. He kitted himself up with latex gloves, a balaclava, wet wipes and nail clippers to try to avoid being traced.

Mrs Justice Cutts said Saadi had attacked Gray and Miles because he had a grievance against society and against women in particular. Rejection by girls and women had led to a “deeply suppressed rage” and the idea of becoming a notorious killer attracted him. She said he was an “extremely dangerous young man” who thought he had planned the “perfect crime”. […]

The court heard that Saadi harboured strong misogynistic views, repeatedly telling fellow students at the University of Greenwich that women were weaker than men and should not work in certain jobs. It is possible he may have taken sexual pleasure in the killing. While he was being held in the high-security Belmarsh prison in south-east London, awaiting trial, he asked a female officer if the killing was making headlines and then masturbated in front of her.(“Student with ‘rage’ against women jailed for at least 39 years for Bournemouth beach murder,” The Guardian, 28th March 2025)

Dual-heritage misogynist murderers Elliot Rodger and Nasen Saadi 

That story is reality and confirms that it’s non-White men, not White men, who pose the greatest threat to women and girls. Accordingly, the leftist media are drawing absolutely no parallels between all-too-real Nasen Saadi and entirely invented “Jamie Miller.” Nor are the leftist media exploring other uncomfortable aspects of Saadi’s horrific crime. The Guardian said that he was “from south London.” It would be much more accurate to say he was from the Third World. In smarmy leftist terminology, Saadi is of “dual heritage,” born in Thailand of Iraqi and Thai parents. In this, he’s like the infamous misogynist murderer Elliot Rodger, also of “dual heritage” and also full of rage at “rejection by girls and women.” 

The leftist media definitely do not want to explore those unsettling parallels between Rodger and Saadi, because the real concern of leftists is not to protect women and girls of any race, but to foment hate against men and boys of exclusively one race, namely, the White race. Adolescence is what communists call agitprop, or artistic propaganda designed, without regard for truth or reality, to agitate, arouse emotion, and advance the cause of leftism. The creators of the show have openly admitted that their fantasy was inspired by the real murder of a 15-year-old schoolgirl by a 17-year-old schoolboy in 2023. But that real killer was completely unsuitable for anti-White agitprop. He was Black, tall and athletic but also ugly, and called Hassan Sentamu.

Ugly Black and cherubic White: the real misogynist murderer Hassan Sentamu and the fake misogynist murderer Jamie Miller

Shaheen Baig, the casting director who carefully chose a cherubic White boy to play a murderer (image from Youtube)

That’s why Sentamu was race-shifted into a short White schoolboy called Jamie Miller who looks cherubic, not chilling. This was a deliberate anti-White choice and is central to the way Adolescence joins the leftist war on Truth, Beauty and Goodness. It’s no surprise that the casting director of the show is an overweight non-White woman called Shaheen Baig, who, as the Guardian approvingly notes, “looked at 500 boys for the part.”

Ugly but virtuous: the women-respecting Black heroes of Adolescence

As Edward Dutton points out in his insightful analysis of Adolescence, the principal Black schoolboy in Adolescence is virtuous, not villainous. He’s the intelligent and sensitive son of the show’s Black hero, the policeman who tries to protect women and girls against deadly White male violence. However, Dutton doesn’t point out another important thing about the virtuous Black schoolboy. Unlike the cherubic-looking White villain, he’s ugly. Again, this was a deliberate choice by the show and its casting director. They wanted to contrast the virtue of an ugly Black with the villainy of an attractive White. As I said in “A Clown Called Chleo,” the fixed principle of leftism is to champion the unnatural, abnormal and ugly. Dutton does point out another example of that leftist principle at work in Adolescence. At one point, a virtuous White man serves as the “appropriate adult” when villainous White Jamie is in a police van. And guess what? The White man is a dwarf with “scoliosis of the spine.” That is, he’s abnormal and suffers from an unnatural condition. As Dutton emphasizes, virtuous characters in Adolescence are never normal White males, who are instead portrayed as either villainous or vapid. 

In short, Adolescence inverts reality and wages war on Truth, Beauty and Goodness. And that’s precisely why a possibly Jewish leftist called Jake Kanter has described it as “flawless” and the Guardian has described it as “the closest thing to TV perfection in decades.” Where Kanter sees flawlessness, I see fapping; where the Guardian sees near perfection, I see pornography. The show is acting as a kind of political pornography for leftists, allowing them to indulge in a frenzied bout of moral masturbation. Just as literal masturbation is about pleasuring oneself without procreating,[2] moral masturbation is about portraying oneself as virtuous without actually possessing virtue or doing good. Indeed, the moral masturbation of the left does serious harm to the objects of its pretended concern. Adolescence inverts and evades reality, rather than confronting it. The Guardian claims that the show asks “devastating questions.” Wrong! It evades devastating questions and tells leftists what they want to hear, not what exists in reality. 

Misogynist master-manipulator 

That’s why the show race-shifted the reality of an ugly Black 17-year-old committing a misogynist murder into the fantasy of a cherubic White 13-year-old committing a misogynist murder. And when the show singles out the part-Black Andrew Tate as the misogynist master-manipulator behind little White Jamie’s murderous villainy, it doesn’t explore some “devastating” statistics from a survey conducted in 2023: “Those from a racial-minority background were more likely to view Tate positively — 41 per cent of black respondents and 31 per cent of Asian [e.g., Pakistani] respondents, dropping down to 15 per cent for white respondents.”

In other words, far more non-Whites are fans of misogynist master-manipulator Andrew Tate[3] than Whites are. And yet leftists are pretending that the opposite is true. They’re falling over themselves to heap praise on a TV fantasy that inverts reality, that presents non-Whites, the group posing the greatest threat to women, as the protectors of women, and that race-shifts an ugly Black killer into a cherubic White killer. Leftists love lies, which is precisely why leftists are adulating Adolescence.

[1]  The murdered woman was a lesbian and had a “wife,” which would once have made the murder seem even worse to leftists. Today, however, translunacy has made real lesbians no longer special or privileged in orthodox leftism. They’ve even become suspect. See my article “Dykes Are Dull!” for further discussion.

[2]In a sense, the use of contraception makes normal heterosexual sex into a form of masturbation, turning one’s partner into a kind of unusually realistic sex-doll. Some honest homosexuals will admit that the same can be true of all homosexual sex, which is sterile by its very nature.

[3]Interestingly, the misogynist Andrew Tate is of “dual heritage” like the misogynists Elliot Rodger and Nasen Saadi. Tate has an “African American”  father and a White mother. But leftists refuse to investigate how criminal behavior may be encouraged by miscegenation and by the psychological strains of having no clear racial identity. Indeed, miscegenation between distant races may even be genetically harmful and affect the brains of mixed-race children.