Dugin: Russia’s Liberal Saboteurs

Russia has the same problems with its bureaucracy as the U.S. and the West general have. In the U.S. the vast majority of federal bureaucrats are Democrats and, if the first Trump administration is any indication, they will again do all they can to sabotage the policies of the elected government. Trump and Musk are trying to curb this unelected power but it will be very difficult.

Dugin on Arktos:

We have a powerful group of opinion leaders who believe that lifting sanctions would be disastrous. Because liberal-leaning officials would immediately try to roll back all the achievements in import substitution, in asserting the sovereignty of our economy and production, in ensuring security in those areas that are vital to the development of the state.

— Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov

Sergey Lavrov has essentially acknowledged what many experts, including myself, have written about for years: that in Russia there exists an entire class of officials left over from the 1990s who do not share the head of state’s orientation towards strengthening sovereignty. They dream of once again making Russia a part of the global world — a world that no longer exists. This is their phantom pain, but because of it, they take an entirely destructive stance, obstructing the process of sovereignization in all areas.

These stubborn individuals no longer merely want to reshape our economic system to fit the West. While formally maintaining loyalty to President Putin and nodding along with everything he says, they are in fact trying to destroy what has been built, acting in defiance of Russia’s interests. And this is precisely what Lavrov pointed out, referring to opinion leaders — something that already means a great deal.

In reality, contrary to the illusions of the so-called “sixth column,”1 relations between Russia and the West are not improving at all. Yes, there are very cautious steps towards de-escalation with the United States, but Europe, on the contrary, is preparing for war with us. Therefore, our duty — our direct obligation — is to ensure the economic sovereignty of the country. Yet liberal-leaning officials are obstructing this effort.

Liberal ideology itself has already been effectively criminalized in our country. Imagine replacing the word “liberal” in Lavrov’s statement with “Nazi”: in Russia, some officials with Nazi views sympathize with Hitler and do not want to strengthen our national security because they believe things were better under Hitler’s occupation. We would be horrified by such a statement. And yet today, liberalism is practically a synonym for a new form of Western hegemony, racism, and Russophobia. Therefore, to be a liberal in Russia is simply an ideological crime. The foreign minister has, in fact, admitted that such people exist in Russia. And he was almost certainly referring to specific officials — not marginal figures with no influence.

Today, this sixth column is rejoicing over the warming of our relations with Trump. But not in order to strengthen our position — rather, to derail as quickly as possible all the progress Russia has made on the path of sovereignization since the beginning of the Special Military Operation. And this is outright sabotage — treason, betrayal, a revolt, a mutiny of liberal officials. And since even such a cautious, precise, and restrained diplomat has mentioned them in his remarks, it means the situation is extremely serious.

I believe Sergey Lavrov — who stands on the same level as the greatest foreign ministers in the history of our great nation — should be trusted. There truly exists within the country a core force working against President Putin’s sovereign reforms. The sixth column is a threat of conspiracy, essentially of a coup d’état, because the attempt to roll back the achievements in import substitution and economic sovereignization — on which the development and security of our state depend — is nothing less than that. And this is very serious.

(Translated from the Russian)

9 replies
  1. Emil
    Emil says:

    https://rumble.com/v6s4dq7-thorsten-pattberg-western-universities-are-propaganda-factories.html?e9s=src_v1_upp

    I wrote him KB: Wonderful conversation, Kevin, unfortunately far too short. The German language Bolshewikipedia article on the gentleman was made to disappear, although it is available in eight other languages.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20221014091911/https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorsten_Pattberg

    The following book will interest you, although the author was an avowed (and IMHO justified) opponent of the ongoing Islamization of Europe (which is no “fiction”). Wait a few seconds until PDF appears and minimize the zoom if necessary.

    https://pdfhost.io/v/VH8NfA6teu_Presstitutes

    https://off-guardian.org/2018/01/08/english-translation-of-udo-ulfkottes-bought-journalists-suppressed/

    • John
      John says:

      Nothing. He encourages it by flooding Russia with central Asians, and also by sending Arabs and other browns to the Polish border.

  2. John
    John says:

    I thought that maybe you stopped reposting this anti-white freak after I posted his comments about whites in Rhodesia, but I see your priorities these days are promoting Eurasian geopolitical goals instead of white interests.

  3. Eigenvector
    Eigenvector says:

    Dude, Putin isn’t even white. He’s some stocky little mongol with basically a square head. Russia doesn’t care about white people and their liberals are their smallest problem. I’d say the liberals might even be better, considering that their non-liberals are clearing millions of white males in both Russia and Ukraine so that browns, Mohammedins, and assorted Asians can walk in to replace them.

  4. Joe WEbb
    Joe WEbb says:

    7
    days in May, about 1964. with Peter Sellers as the idiot President, George C Scott as the Peter Hegsteth boy-scout jew lover military fool, Sterling Hayden, etc.

    Many laughs. Great movie.

    Dugin, the racial-equality nut case. What could Dugin have to say abut anything worthy of even mention as one of Putin’s emissaries to the Chechens?

    I don’t understand….and what is a 6th columnist? And what about the man-in-the US street vernacular complaints…no comment?

    I don’t get it. Joe

Comments are closed.