Pro-Israel Group Levels Unhinged Smears Against Children’s YouTuber

The dream is over, the fat years are gone. The Jews in the centers of power have run the West into the ground with their war-mongering geopolitics, the opening of the flood gates to the whole world and their financial monopoly system, thereby triggering the rise of China. Now draconian, protectionist measures such as tariff mania are to be used to counteract this, because otherwise the host nations will once again blow up in their faces and identify them as the real culprits and backers.

https://de-metapedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Geld?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en
https://de-metapedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Rechts?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en

Die Ritter vom Gelde (1891) by Karl Türk centers on a secretive financial network referred to as the “Knights of Money,” portrayed in the narrative as a cohesive group of Jewish financiers. The novel depicts these individuals as operating across national borders, using their collective economic influence to shape markets, governments, and societal institutions. Their methods include extending high-interest loans, orchestrating speculative ventures, and leveraging debts to gain control over key assets. The story follows their interactions with both willing collaborators and reluctant figures across society, illustrating their ability to manipulate economic and political outcomes.

The narrative emphasizes the group’s anonymity and cohesion, with members acting through intermediaries to maintain secrecy. Jewish identity is presented as a unifying factor among the “Knights,” who are described as prioritizing financial gain and collective power over personal or national loyalties. The plot explores how their economic strategies impact other characters, including non-Jewish businessmen, politicians, and ordinary citizens, many of whom face ruin after entering agreements with the group. Moral dilemmas arise as individuals weigh short-term profit against long-term consequences, with loyalty and betrayal serving as recurring themes.

Set in the late 19th century, the novel contrasts traditional economic practices with modern financial systems, framing the “Knights” as catalysts for industrialization’s disruptive effects. Scenes alternate between opulent urban financial districts and struggling rural communities, highlighting disparities exacerbated by the group’s activities. The prose employs melodramatic dialogue and moralistic contrasts, often juxtaposing “honest labor” with the perceived ruthlessness of speculative finance.

Through its portrayal of the “Knights,” the novel engages with contemporary anxieties about globalization, capitalism, and social change. The Jewish identity of the group is integral to the plot, as their shared cultural and religious background is presented as a foundation for their collective actions. The story does not explicitly analyze or critique these portrayals but instead uses them to drive its exploration of power, ambition, and economic transformation.

Karl Türk (1840-1908) was an Austrian politician and author prominent in late 19th-century Austria. Born in Znaim, Moravia (now Znojmo, Czech Republic), Türk pursued a career in law, serving as a lawyer and notary in Lower Austria. He became actively involved in local and regional politics, advocating for German national interests within the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

Türk was a member of the Lower Austrian Landtag (state parliament) and later served as a representative in the Austrian Reichsrat (imperial parliament). He aligned himself with German nationalist parties and factions, focusing on issues related to language rights, education, and cultural autonomy for German-speaking populations within the empire. Türk was also a publicist, contributing articles and essays to newspapers and journals that promoted his political views. His writings often reflected German nationalistic sentiments and criticism of Austrian government policies.

In addition to his political activities, Türk authored several books and pamphlets, including the novel Die Ritter vom Gelde (The Knights of Money), which explored themes of financial power and its societal impact. His literary work often intertwined with his political agenda, reflecting his concerns about economic and social issues within the context of Austrian politics. Türk remained active in Austrian political life until his death in 1908, continuing to advocate for German national interests and contribute to public discourse through his writings and political activities.

https://archive.org/details/dierittervomgel00trgoog/page/n8/mode/2up

Karl Helfferich’s Das Geld (The Money) examines the nature, functions, and historical evolution of monetary systems, focusing on currency stability and state authority. The 1923 sixth edition incorporates analysis of Germany’s post-WWI hyperinflation, emphasizing the relationship between money, state power, and economic crises. Helfferich grounds his theory in Georg Friedrich Knapp’s “state theory of money,” which posits that money derives its value from government decree rather than intrinsic material worth. He expands on Knapp’s concept of “chartal money” (state-issued legal tender) to explain how modern economies rely on state-backed currency for transactions and debt settlement.

The book traces the transition from commodity-based money (e.g., gold or silver) to abstract, state-controlled systems, arguing that trust in government institutions is essential for maintaining currency stability. Helfferich critiques speculative financial practices and advocates for anchoring money to tangible value standards, such as gold reserves, to prevent inflation. He analyzes wartime economies, including the financial strategies of nations during conflicts like the Russo-Japanese War, to illustrate how states manipulate currency under stress.

In the 1923 edition, Helfferich addresses Germany’s hyperinflation directly, linking it to excessive money printing, reparations burdens, and the erosion of public confidence in the Reichsmark. He underscores the societal consequences of currency collapse, such as the breakdown of trade and the rise of barter economies, while cautioning against conflating nominal and real economic values. The work serves as both a theoretical treatise and a policy-oriented critique, advocating for disciplined fiscal governance to restore monetary order.

Helfferich’s analysis remains rooted in the interplay between political authority and economic systems, framing money as a tool of statecraft that requires prudent management to ensure societal stability. The book’s later editions, including the 1923 version, reflect his engagement with contemporary debates on inflation, currency reform, and the role of central banks in crisis response.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Helfferich
https://archive.org/search?query=Karl+Helfferich

The presentation “Rothschild oder Hitler” by Horst Mahler explores the alleged historical and economic conflict between international financial systems, symbolized by the Rothschild family, and national political forces, represented by Adolf Hitler. Mahler frames this dichotomy as a central driver of 20th-century geopolitical events, particularly the Second World War. The lecture advances the argument that global financial elites, epitomized by the Rothschilds, historically sought to dominate world politics through control of monetary systems, while figures like Hitler attempted to establish economic independence through nationalist policies.

Mahler posits that the Rothschild dynasty, as a metonym for transnational finance, influenced major conflicts, including both World Wars, to consolidate power and enforce debt-based economic models. He characterizes Hitler’s regime as a reaction to this perceived financial hegemony, emphasizing the Nazi regime’s efforts to create a self-sufficient economy through mechanisms like state-controlled currency and rejection of international banking practices. The presentation links these historical dynamics to modern financial systems, suggesting that contemporary global institutions perpetuate similar structures of economic dependency.

The narrative employs a conspiratorial framework, depicting the Rothschilds as part of a shadowy network that manipulates governments and economies for its own benefit. Mahler contrasts this with Hitler’s vision of economic autarky, which he portrays as a thwarted alternative to financial globalization. The lecture frequently references historical events, such as the Treaty of Versailles and the Weimar Republic’s hyperinflation, to argue that financial elites exploited these crises to expand their influence.

Mahler’s analysis extends to current economic policies, framing central banking systems and international organizations like the IMF as modern iterations of the same financial control mechanisms. He advocates for a return to national economic sovereignty, echoing themes of self-reliance and opposition to debt-based financing. The presentation blends historical revisionism with anti-globalist rhetoric, presenting a continuous struggle between centralized financial power and nationalist resistance.

Stylistically, the lecture combines polemical rhetoric with selective historical references, often omitting contextual factors like the geopolitical complexities of the interwar period or the role of non-financial actors in shaping historical outcomes. Mahler’s arguments rely heavily on binary oppositions, such as “national versus global” or “productive versus speculative capital,” to simplify multifaceted historical processes.

The content reflects Mahler’s broader ideological trajectory, transitioning from left-wing radicalism in his early career to far-right extremism in later years. His synthesis of anti-capitalist critiques with nationalist and antisemitic tropes illustrates a recurring theme in conspiracy theories that conflate financial systems with ethnic or cultural groups. The lecture’s dissemination on alternative platforms underscores its alignment with narratives that challenge mainstream historical and economic scholarship.

https://odysee.com/@QuantumRhino:9/HorstMahler-RothschildOderHitler:5

Horst Lüning’s video discusses the recent stock market crash and the announcement of significant import tariffs by Donald Trump. Lüning presents a counter-narrative, arguing that these events, while seemingly negative in the short term, are part of a larger plan to address a deeper economic crisis facing the U.S. and, by extension, the world.

Lüning highlights the growing debt and interest obligations of the United States as a central problem. He suggests that the U.S. and the West are on a “kamikaze course” and that drastic measures are needed to avert a severe economic downturn. He argues that Trump’s tariffs, while disruptive, are a calculated attempt to address these issues.

Lüning presents a chart comparing the growth of the U.S. GDP, the M2 money supply, and the national debt. He notes that the money supply and debt have been growing exponentially, outpacing GDP growth, especially since the end of the gold standard. He interprets this as a sign that the U.S. economy is on an unsustainable path and that inflation is a risk.

Lüning argues that the recession was imminent before Trump’s tariffs, resulting from prior administrations’ policies. He suggests that the tariffs are a tool to manage the impending economic correction, rather than the cause of it. By deliberately making imported goods more expensive, Trump aims to rebalance trade, reduce the trade deficit, and encourage domestic production, thereby strengthening the U.S. economy in the long run.

Lüning references various sources and formulas to support his analysis. He also mentions his own investment portfolio adjustments, indicating that he has diversified his holdings to prepare for potential economic volatility. He cautions viewers that this is not financial advice but rather his personal opinion and interpretation of events.

In summary, Lüning challenges the mainstream media’s negative portrayal of Trump’s tariffs, framing them as a calculated, albeit disruptive, strategy to address underlying economic imbalances and avert a larger crisis.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYcBxrr0CV0

There is some word in my post that was being automatically filtered and censored by the software, resulting in the deletion of my entire post, so I replaced all “o” with “a” to circumvent the censor filter. I don’t know what posting service this website is using, but the service is censoring legit non-spam posts.

Since every European-American politician knows what is going on in the Middle East, they are all extreme innate sociopaths for accepting Israelite money in exchange for supporting the extreme torture of Arabs. But, was this Children’s YouTuber person manifesting innate universal altruism when showing Altruism for Arab children? With all the dysgenics, I have been quite “morally disgusted” with the entire European ethnicity, and have just assumed that virtually all of them are now genetically undesirable, completely Individually Selected now, and just awaiting extinction since they can’t function as a collective race anymore. Just look at extreme anti-free speech laws in England, and the English just let it happen. English people don’t even care, as if they think that they are only interested in speech about recreational activities like sports and foods and thus don’t care if they can’t talk about certain types of politics and facts. One would think that the English still have enough IQ points to realize that something is quite wrong and that their elites are trying to hide facts when they go so far as to scan all public online forums for comments by UK citizens to see if they had made any forbidden speech and discussed forbidden topics. It’s illegal to even visit and view forbidden websites and to download copies of books and articles of forbidden topics. But no, Englishmen see nothing suspicious about any of this. They can still talk about their football and fish and chips, so they are all happy. Then people like Children’s Youtuber (is this actually her channel’s name?) comes along and do what they do, and I get all confused. Is she an innate universal altruist? And if she is, did she realize that she could very well get her channel closed down, get all her bank accounts closed down, be rendered homeless, and finally be killed on the streets by a person paid by the Likud Party? Perhaps she was not aware of the risks and has never visited a race realist website. Perhaps she is a rare universal altruist, but just uninformed? I want to understand her brain genetics/psychometrics. Woodley of Menie says that Europeans throughout history on average have a child mortality rate of 40%. He says that for all brain mutations to be weeded out, one out of three children must die, a 33% child mortality rate. But for the last 150 years, child mortality rate has been drastically reducing, now at just 1%. Thus, most ethnic Europeans today are genetic mutants with high mutations for the brain, especially affecting genes that code for personality. Most mutations affect brain genes since most human genes code for brain proteins. Dutton commented that 90% of all ethnic Europeans alive today should be dead, and would be dead if the Industrial Revolution never occurred which has reduced child mortality rates. This would explain why most Europeans today are passive, lazy, stupid, apathetic to the suffering of other Europeans or humans overall, hedonistic, gluttonous, etc. So, what’s up with this Children’s Youtuber?

PS: I forgot almost the most (in)famous example
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fI5Qhd3R8ik

This “Australian” of oriental phenotype, absorbed by the judeo-bolshevik mind virus, traces the Zionist “Holocaust” narrative of the “war of annihilation”, which he presupposes as undeniable fact, back to an American source.

No Lebensraum without Go West. Reason enough to plaster the whole of the West with “Holocaust museums”. Why such neo-Marxists don’t flee to Cuba, Venezuela or North Korea, but prefer capitalism, remains puzzling.

In any case, his repulsive skin blemishes, his chimp-like body hair and his overall disgusting appearance are factual. Whether he also has a strong bad breath must, like his “thesis”, be relegated to the realm of provisional conjecture.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1gcipAvplY