The UK Cabinet Minister Who Knows, Deep Down, She’s a Prominent Example of Those Responsible for the Pakistani Grooming Gangs

The Morally Superior, Self-Righteous, Neurotic, Narcissistic, Virtue-Signaller extraordinaire, and in All-Ways-Perfect Lucy Powell 

Why would a relatively senior Labour Cabinet Minister – Lucy Powell, the Leader of the House of Commons – refer to one of the worst scandals in British history, an effective war crime against the British people by foreign invaders, as blowing “that little trumpet” and as a “dog whistle”? (See also Tobias Langdon’s condemnation of Powell.) In the heat of a radio discussion program in which Powell was being out-debated, what can be the psychology behind such a grossly insensitive remark, especially from the party that is supposed to care about people’s “feelings” above all else?

Between 1998 and 2010 alone, many thousands of underage English girls, most of them from the underclass and from vulnerable backgrounds were “groomed” and trafficked into prostitution – into statutory rape – by Pakistani males in ex-Industrial towns. The grooming involved the men bonding with these girls, and getting them addicted to alcohol and drugs such as heroin, and pimping round the Pakistani community. One of these girls were as young as 9, many were younger than 12 and the age-group which the clients specifically preferred was between 12 and 14; in other words pubescent rather than fully sexually mature.

Many of these girls were extremely vulnerable; in foster care or children’s homes due to their dysfunctional backgrounds. In fact, the Pakistanis were even able to pick them up from their children’s homes in some cases, or even from their schools. One 11-year-old girl lost her virginity to a Pakistani man on a school playground. Concerns were first raised about what was going on about the year 2000, but, we know now, these were suppressed by the police, social workers and local politicians because it was feared that race relations would be damaged, and their might even be riots, if what was happening got out. People also feared speaking out in case they were accused of racism. Thus, it was allowed to continue right up until 2010, when men were finally brought to trial and there began to be reports into what had been happening. The horrors went beyond mere frequent statutory rape. A 12 year old girl in Oxford was beaten with a baseball bat which was then inserted into her vagina. Her anus was widened using a pump, such that penises could more easily fit into it, and her lead abuser, Mohammed Karrar, branded his initials close to her anus using a red hot pin.

Karrar was jailed in 2013. However, what happened was so horrific, and on such an enormous scale, it is as though the English simply couldn’t face it. Even in spite of the local inquiries, it only began to really be spoken of when Elon Musk started tweeting about it at the beginning of this year, and, even then, the Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, referred to the fevered response as a “far right band wagon.”

With Lucy Powell, however, the mask that the Left in the UK actually care about vulnerable English people, let alone these thousands of rape victims, has finally come off, due to her momentary emotional reaction. As I discuss in my book Woke Eugenics, a number of studies have shown that the Left are extremely Machiavellian. They only ever favoured their native working class because they were an out-group which they could employ to covertly attain power via virtue-signalling. But now you can engage in virtue-signalling more conspicuously about foreigners, as they are even more distant from self so easier to Romanticise, the horribly White working class are an inconvenience to their high Neuroticism, a barrier to their resentment-triggered desire to tear traditions down and signal their morality. Lucy Powell’s reaction makes perfect sense in this light.

We have trouble talking about what happened in the UK. We have trouble articulating it because what’s happened is so bad, so appalling. Over the last 50 or 60 years, Pakistanis have come among the British and have acted in a covert manner, like an invading force. What you do when you are an invading force, as did the Russians, and even to some extent the Americans when they invaded Germany, is you go and you rape the women.

Why do you do that? You do it in order to mark yourself genetically, on the people. You do it in order to humiliate the males. You do it in order to destroy their morale. And that is what these men were doing, and they were doing it for a period of at least 20 years and, according to some reports, for a lot longer. It was covered up by the Labour-run authorities because it highlighted a problem with multiculturalism and no problem with that could be highlighted because of course, multiculturalism had become the new morality—sacrosanct and above reproach. It triggers the moral posturing that justifies the power of the New Labour ruling class—of people such as Powell who, high in Narcissism, need to see themselves as special and as morally superior.

But Lucy Powell was on the ropes. The grooming gang scandal showed her that she was at best gulled into a terrible ideology and at worse morally complicit in rape for promoting that ideology, something she’d done because of her own mental instability; her own flaws. Her comments reflected a series of psychological mechanisms via which she could maintain her image of her perfect, morally superior self.

There simply can’t be problems due to her policies. So she deflects by having a go at the person interviewing her, by shooting the messenger, by saying that by bringing up grooming gangs, he’s causing a lack of social cohesion. So she refers to his mentioning the grooming gangs as a “little trumpet” and a “dog whistle;” presumably to the non-humans of the “far right” and the “white working class” of whom they are composed. She wants to shut down the topic, to avoid thinking about it; to end the cognitive dissonance.

Obviously, she’s trying to minimize it as well, which is very interesting psychologically. She’s minimizing what is happening, referring to it as a “little trumpet,” a really revolting term. This minimizing allows her to tell herself that even if her policies caused it, it really wasn’t that bad. In this, she was supported by former Guardian editor Michael White who defended Powell on Twitter, proclaiming “Sex is complicated,” the implication being that statuary rape is a grey area: Some of these 13 year-old girls wanted it: Their suffering is minimized and with it so is the cognitive dissonance of Multiculturalist Narcissists who must feel morally superior at all times.

Left-wing people are higher in Neuroticism than people that are right-wing. They are less emotionally controlled, and therefore the truth has come out. Powell is less able to control her emotions because being high in Neuroticism makes you emotionally unstable, but it also means you feel very strongly things like resentment, anger and even cognitive dissonance. So Powell’s contemptuous remarks really do make sense.

One imagines she resents the grooming gang victims; almost blames them for damaging the god of multiculturalism by speaking out. Powell, indeed, is likely to simply be low in empathy. There are a number of studies on how left-wing people are lower in generalized empathy than right-wing people. They are lower in Agreeableness. They are unkind, they are Machiavellian, as noted earlier, and they are perfectly happy to see people as a means to an end.