Episcopal Church refuses to resettle white Afrikaners, citing moral oppositio

The pathetic Episcopal Church showing once again the disaster of mainstream Protestantism. I can only hope that the other grifters (these organizations get millions of dollars/year from the feds), including HIAS and Catholic Charities do the same. The HIAS is one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit against the Trump administration.

Episcopal Church refuses to resettle white Afrikaners, citing moral opposition

n a striking move that ends a nearly four-decades-old relationship between the federal government and the Episcopal Church, the denomination announced on Monday that it is terminating its partnership with the government to resettle refugees, citing moral opposition to resettling white Afrikaners from South Africa who have been classified as refugees by President Trump’s administration.

The request, Rowe said, crossed a moral line for the Episcopal Church, which is part of the global Anglican Communion, which boasts among its leaders the late Archbishop Desmond Tutu, a celebrated and vocal opponent of apartheid in South Africa.

“In light of our church’s steadfast commitment to racial justice and reconciliation and our historic ties with the Anglican Church of Southern Africa, we are not able to take this step,” Rowe wrote. “Accordingly, we have determined that, by the end of the federal fiscal year, we will conclude our refugee resettlement grant agreements with the U.S. federal government.”

Rowe stressed that while Episcopal Migration Ministries will seek to “wind down all federally funded services by the end of the federal fiscal year in September,” the denomination will continue to support immigrants and refugees in other ways, such as offering aid to refugees who have already been resettled.

The announcement came just as flights with Afrikaners were scheduled to arrive at Washington Dulles International Airport, outside Washington, D.C. — the first batch of entries after Trump declared via a February executive order that the U.S. would take in “Afrikaners in South Africa who are victims of unjust racial discrimination.” The South African government has stridently denied allegations of systemic racial animus, as has a coalition of white religious leaders in the region that includes many Anglicans.

“The stated reasons for [Trump’s actions] are claims of victimisation, violence and hateful rhetoric against white people in South Africa along with legislation providing for the expropriation of land without compensation,” read the letter from white South African religious leaders, which included among its four authors an Anglican priest. “As white South Africans in active leadership within the Christian community, representing diverse political and theological perspectives, we unanimously reject these claims.”

Rowe noted his announcement comes as the Trump administration has otherwise all but frozen the refugee program, with Afrikaners among the few — and possibly only — people granted entry as refugees since January. Shortly after he was sworn in, Trump signed an executive order that essentially halted the refugee program and stopped payments to organizations that assist with refugee resettlement — including, according to one group, payments for work already performed.

A representative for Church World Service, which is among the groups currently suing the administration, said the organization “has agreed to support one family through remote services,” but pointed to an additional statement from last week that voiced ongoing frustration with the government’s actions.

“We are concerned that the U.S. Government has chosen to fast-track the admission of Afrikaners, while actively fighting court orders to provide life-saving resettlement to other refugee populations who are in desperate need of resettlement,” Rick Santos, head of Church World Service, said in a statement last week.

“By resettling this population, the Government is demonstrating that it still has the capacity to quickly screen, process, and depart refugees to the United States. It’s time for the Administration to honor our nation’s commitment to the thousands of refugee families it abandoned with its cruel and illegal executive order.”

Matthew Soerens, vice president of advocacy and policy at World Relief, an evangelical Christian group that helps resettle refugees, said in an email that his group anticipates “serving a small number” of the arrivals who qualify for Office of Refugee Resettlement-funded services. But he said the situation is “complicated by the reality that the government is not bringing them to the US through the traditional State Department initial resettlement process, where World Relief has historically been one of the ten private agencies that implement this public-private partnership, because that process remains suspended.”

He added: “Our primary response to this situation is to continue to urge the administration to resume that initial resettlement process for a broad range of individuals who have fled persecution on account of their faith, political opinion, race or other reasons outlined under US law — and to highlight the support for doing so from the evangelical Christians who are World Relief’s core base of support, including some very conservative evangelicals who see refugee resettlement as a vital tool to protect those denied religious freedom abroad.”

10 replies
  1. Hendrik Pienaar
    Hendrik Pienaar says:

    When is a racist not a racist?
    These Afrikaners are escaping from discrimination on grounds of color, and being opposed solely for the same reason. “Separate development” was abandoned 30 years ago.

  2. Paracelsus88
    Paracelsus88 says:

    As one of my long-gone “mentors” always summarized about “our” educational system and mainstream churches, “…it’s the teachers and the preachers…”.

  3. Anon
    Anon says:

    Does anyone think that anyone in the White House has sincere Altruistic sentiments for ethnic Europeans in South Africa, and that instead they are only doing this as a “media gimmick” to ensure the European-Americans continue to support the Republican Party? As I understand it, while Trump is directly controlled by Israel’s Likud Party, the American Republican Party is directly controlled by American Ashkenazi Neo-Conservatives, and there are some disagreements between the Likud Party and the American Ashkenazi Neo-Conservatives, especially when it comes to how far one should go in pretending to care for ethnic Europeans in order to get votes. The Neo-Conservatives think that the Likuds are being too risky by going too far in pretending to care for ethnic Europeans.

    • K M Landis
      K M Landis says:

      You are right. The Republican Party is subservient to AIPAC and Israel. They put Israel First, not America.

      Nevertheless, this small gesture has infuriated the Democratic Party. And it exposes the anti-White ideology of the so-called Episcopalian “Church”. They are now exposed for what they really are – weak, degenerate and anti-White.

  4. Pierre de Craon
    Pierre de Craon says:

    “The stated reasons for [Trump’s actions] are claims of victimisation, violence and hateful rhetoric against white people in South Africa along with legislation providing for the expropriation of land without compensation. … As white South Africans in active leadership within the Christian community, representing diverse political and theological perspectives, we unanimously reject these claims.”

    These sentences constitute as plain an admission as I have ever seen that the concept of “racism” is nothing more than a rhetorical construct designed to bully and intimidate rather than a legitimate category in moral thought or praxis. (I know that the foregoing will not come as news to many, if not most, who frequent this site.)

    These Establishment-enabling moral preeners and others of their ilk will never acknowledge their hypocrisy, of course, but no one in the pro-White camp should ever consent to use “racism” or related words without the accompanying sneer quotes. Still less should anyone here treat “racism” as a charge needing answer or apology. It is a term and concept to be regarded with contempt.

  5. K M Landis
    K M Landis says:

    Once again, the Most Phony Rev. Sean W. Rowe proves that he and his “church” are ethno-masochists. They hate Whites, and love Jews & Negros. They pride themselves on their weakness, gullibility and stupidity, which they imagine makes them “holy” and “blessed”. So much for their phony religion.

    Like all other so-called “Christian” churches, the Episcopalian “Church” wants only non-White migrants, to further the Great Replacement, which is a Jewish project. They are tools of the Jews. They refuse to resettle Whites, even to save them from genocide.

    The so-called “Episcopalian Church” has long abandoned any morality, any self-respect, and any faith in God. They are amoral atheists, and effeminate masochists. They deserve to perish.

  6. James Clayton
    James Clayton says:

    Last winter, we photographed a lovely old Episcopal church in town casually flying a rainbow flag by itself from a makeshift pole out of an upstairs window.

    RED ICE video those of all ages should appreciate of Jewish Family Service facilitating the
    migrant invasion, REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT:
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/oNJpd5tNMcRV/

    Seventh-day Adventist (SDA) ’ADRA’ does exactly the same thing:
    http://adventmessenger.org/how-should-seventh-day-adventists-respond-to-the
    immigration-crisis/

  7. James J. O'Meara
    James J. O'Meara says:

    Worked for several Jewish firms in NYC for years, but the biggest assholes I ever worked for were the Episcopal Church.

    In a biography of sci/fi editor John W. Campbell, he describes his mother as “a would-be aesthete and a paranoid sadist whose Episcopalian upbringing taught her that her role in life was to give orders.” I showed this to the only other non-Episcopalian, who had been there 30 years as assistant to the head honcho, and she thought a moment and then said, “Yes, that’s about right.”

  8. Anon
    Anon says:

    A possible reason why the White House is importing a few dozen South Africans:

    ‘White farmers are being brutally killed in South Africa’ warned President Donald this week amid all the uproar and craziness over tariffs, world trade and kickoff of a campaign to force Big Pharma to lower its prices to consumers.

    Why would Trump target South Africa? First, because South Africa dared accuse Israel’s far right government of genocide and war crimes in its savage repression of Gaza’s Palestinians. An estimated 55,000 Palestinians, the majority women and children, have been killed by Israel in Gaza. Another estimated 2,500 Palestinians are believed to have died in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, and some 2,000 or more dead remain under the ruins of destroyed apartment buildings in Gaza.

    The Trump Administration is very close to Israel’s hard right-wing government. So far, Trump has followed and defended Israel’s repression and slaughter in Gaza. It’s often hard to tell if the American dog is wagging the Israeli tail or vice versa.

    Trump’s government has repeatedly lashed out at South Africa for accusing Israel of genocide and war crimes. Trump and his MAGA backers are well known for their negative feelings about blacks in general and have made efforts to eradicate often deep black influence in US society. Bringing in whites from South Africa is a novel way of lessening America’s infatuation with all things black under the Biden administration.

    Unz.com/emargolis/africas-lost-white-tribe/

  9. Salvador
    Salvador says:

    The Episcopal Church lost 40 thousand members last year and had been struggling…..this type of stuff represents why I’m no longer a Christian… hopefully the trend continues

Comments are closed.