First Thoughts on the Israeli Strikes

Yesterday I posted an article saying Trump told Netanyahu to hold off attacking Iran. Israel did it anyway. This says a lot. Israel has never been subservient to the U.S. Indeed it’s the other way around, with the powerful Israel Lobby dominating Congress and often the president, with the result of thousands of American lives and many billions of dollars spent in the region. I should have known that.

Predictably there is the usual chorus of pro-Israel voices in Congress and the media praising the attacks. And as always, the U.S. is in fact deeply involved whether Trump wants it or not. From Tucker Carlson’s daily email:

While the American military may not have physically perpetrated the assault, years of funding and sending weapons to Israel, which Donald Trump just bragged about on Truth Social, undeniably place the U.S. at the center of last night’s events. Washington knew these attacks would happen. They aided Israel in carrying them out. Politicians purporting to be America First can’t now credibly turn around and say they had nothing to do with it. Our country is in deep.

Carlson, as a leading member of the mainstream anti-war right, also notes the obvious: there is no way this is in America’s interests.

Donald Trump admitted he had prior knowledge about Israel’s attack on Iran on Thursday, telling Bret Baier he knew of the Netanyahu government’s plan to conduct the preemptive strikes and that the assault came as no surprise.

Despite being complicit in the act of war, the president hopes last night’s events will help his ongoing nuclear negotiations with Iran. Steve Witkoff was scheduled to participate in the next round of talks on Sunday, but whether that will still happen is up in the air.

“Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb, and we are hoping to get back to the negotiating table. We will see. There are several people in leadership in Iran that will not be coming back,” Trump said following the strikes.

It’s worth taking a step back and wondering how any of this helps the United States. We can’t think of a single way.

And, more pointedly:

“From this day forward, it’s going to be only America first. America first.”

That’s a direct quote from Donald Trump’s first inaugural address, and it’s the same sentiment that thrust him back into the White House in January. Now, the world will find out if he really meant it.

Now that Benjamin Netanyahu and his war-hungry government have executed their long-awaited assault, the president faces a legacy-altering decision: to support, or not to support?

We’d like to take this opportunity to state our position as clearly as possible. The United States should not at any level participate in a war with Iran. No funding, no American weapons, no troops on the ground. Regardless of what our “special ally” says, a fight with the Iranians has nothing to offer the United States. It is not in our national interest.

If Israel wants to wage this war, it has every right to do so. It is a sovereign country, and it can do as it pleases. But not with America’s backing. At an absolute minimum, the United States continuing to insert itself in this conflict will further whip up the radical Islamic world’s hatred for the West and fuel the next generation of terrorism. The worst case? Thousands of immediate American deaths, all in the name of a foreign agenda that has nothing to do with our country.

It goes without saying that neither of those possibilities would be beneficial for the United States. But there is another option: drop Israel. Let them fight their own wars. 

No matter how many bogus antisemitism allegations neocon ghouls like Mark Levin hurl at Americans who advocate for that path, opposing destroying the United States in the name of the Netanyahu government has nothing to do with Israel. It’s about America. We reject the idea of involving the U.S. in an Israeli war for the same reason we would stand against doing the same thing on behalf of Eritrea, Suriname, Cambodia, or any other random country you could close your eyes and point at on a map. It is not America’s fight. Engaging in it would be a middle finger in the faces of the millions of voters who cast their ballots in hopes of creating a government that would finally put the United States first. What happens next will define Donald Trump’s presidency.

Fox News adds that Trump “noted that the U.S. is ready to defend itself and Israel if Iran retaliates. In recent weeks, the U.S. has replenished Iron Dome missiles.”

Trump is likely unhappy with what Israel did but will make the best of it and will defend Israel if it comes to that. As the supreme leader of the most powerful country in the world, he likely thinks everyone else has to listen to him. How’s that working out with the trade deals? China with its stranglehold on rare earth supplies clearly holds the upper hand, so Trump will have no choice but to once again try to save face.

He is encouraging Iran to stand down “before there is nothing left.”

Mr. Trump’s social media post attempted to put pressure on Iran to continue negotiating. “The next already planned attacks,” he wrote, would be “even more brutal.”

He added: “Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire.” In his often-used capital letters, he concluded, “JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.”

Israel has already killed top military leaders and nuclear scientists.

So far Iran has done nothing in retaliation and I doubt they have the ability to do meaningful damage to Israel. If so, Israel will be the unchallenged dominant power in the Middle East and will further degrade the Palestinians.

 

18 replies
  1. Dr. Doom
    Dr. Doom says:

    This is the beginning of the end of the synagogue of Satan. Iran has hypersonic missiles that can penetrate the flimsy dome of these imbeciles. We shall see the inherent cowardice of these rats when their towns burn. Zog has made its own destruction. You shall see domestic violence against the fake jews. They have brought their own killers to their homes. These bioweapons they created will blow up in their own homes.

    • B. Valient
      B. Valient says:

      They’re not “fake” jews and distracting feom that fact renders us like conspiracy nuts. They’re descendants of those sociopaths that wrote those psychotic tales of victimhood.

      They’re going to reap what they sow because they’re an evil race.

  2. Captainchaos
    Captainchaos says:

    Zionist Jewish oligarchs gave Trump permission to pursue his America First policies IN EXCHANGE FOR Trump’s backing of the creation of Eretz Israel. That was ALWAYS the deal. Iran will be militarily neutered and the Palestinians will be completely ethnically cleansed. How can Whites benefit from this new dispensation? It seems as though White countries need a good deal of cleansing themselves so having such housekeeping normalized certainly can’t hurt the endeavor. Also, a territorially expanded Israel gives us a place to put the rest of the Jewish diaspora one day.

    • Mortal Goyal
      Mortal Goyal says:

      So,let Israeli do what it wants **kill** to expand Israeli land mass…so we have more room for , and a place to send, the jews we currently worship?

      Brilliant tactitioning.

      • Captainchaos
        Captainchaos says:

        Why should I give two shits if dark-skinned subhumans get pushed out? Ethnic cleansing is a beautiful thing. North America and Europe must me made 100% White.

  3. Jim Peach
    Jim Peach says:

    Time to impeach Trump for saying he will defend Israel after its aggresion. It will put Vance in, but also send him a message that we won’t put up with this Israel Worship.

  4. FoxDye0
    FoxDye0 says:

    The Synagogue of Satan, will drag us physically into this war. We are run by them, from head to toe throughout the entire world. If they do not blackmail your politicians, they assassinate their characters or their lives.

    I wish it were just fantasy and a conspiracy theory, but we all know the foolishness of denying “shocking facts”. They have wanted this for a very long time. Like it or not, we are deep in this mountain of poop, thanks to Z.O.G.

    We might have an out, or it might be the destruction of our country. Civil war to stave off world war, or start civil war, lose civil war then join world war, or world war here as we are having civil war.

    Nonetheless, now that I think about it, U.N. would never allow our weapon systems to fall into a rebellion’s hands. That would give every government on the planet, an excuse to invade us and use W.M.D.’s as the reason…Poetic justice, some would say.

  5. Anon
    Anon says:

    What can we learn about the genetics of the Iranian leadership from the fact that it appears to be the case that Iran put its complete security in the hands of pure extreme bluffs? The leadership constantly made public statements about having enough cutting-edge missiles to destroy most of Israel and would immediately carry this out if attacked. In other words, Iran’s leadership gave the impression that even if all Iranian citizens were killed off in a nuclear strike, they would take most Israelis with them to the “After-Life”, in “the name of Allah.” So, a 100% pure “house of cards”? Or did Iran’s leadership think that they were trying to buy time until their military has more advanced capability, even the covert creation of nuclear weapons? And what was the point of all those joint military exercises Iran did with Russia and China?

    Putin has signed on paper a document to directly fight anyone who attacks North Korea, and North Korea will do the same, and North Korea already has sent soldiers to Ukraine to help Russia. But, if Israel and NATO bombed the nuclear and military sites of North Korea, does anyone think Putin would actually honor the contract and directly fight Israel and NATO? I speculate that North Korea was duped, just like Syria.

    I speculate that once Iran’s military is completely obliterated in the next several weeks by the Ashkenazim, North Korea could be next.

  6. Pierre de Craon
    Pierre de Craon says:

    So far Iran has done nothing in retaliation, and I doubt they have the ability to do meaningful damage to Israel.

    Iran might well have the ability to respond meaningfully, but I agree with Kevin’s implication that an appropriate response is unlikely, not least because the indications of Israeli penetration of the many anti-Khamenei factions in Iran are very strong. Indeed, a palace coup in Tehran is not unthinkable.

    • mortal goyal
      mortal goyal says:

      Not even gonna bring up the obvious and maddening hypocrisy behind the proposition that Iran cannot have nuclear weapons, but IsraHELL and United Satan can. Really, where the fuck are the adult MEN in the room?

      Shit is getting scary, based on the stupidity of it all alone.

      The jew has ruined the White Man’s soul. And the white man let him.

  7. Joe WEbb
    Joe WEbb says:

    Hats off to Tucker and his “this war is not in our national interest.”

    However if he wanted to be 110%, he could also state the possible view that the Uniparty of Dems and Republicans and Trumpstein want a world war against Russia and China and Iran, etc. to uphold the Domination of the “West” for the US dollar, US hegemony generally, and particularly the Jews who want to win in Ukraine to establish the next Jewish State, New Israel. We in the USA already have Zion National Park, which is a grand affair, and likely remenescent of the noble Mormons imagining their conquest of Christianity as well as the Indians. Imagine Mormons with The Bomb.

    As of this writing, Iran is pounding Tel Aviv and sister cities. Does Iran actually have Oreshnik-like missiles?

    Just for the sake of an argument you understand, just academic doncha know, free speech and all that White Man’s burden stuff.

    Joe

    I got into a little back and forth with the estimable (?) Victor Davis Hanson, Stanford academic, a couple days ago in Menlo Park coffee house. Hanson is a Public Intellectual who luvs Israel.

    If any one wants to hear it, let me know, otherwise I will not bother.

    • mortal goyal
      mortal goyal says:

      Hanson will say anything for media exposure…all these muppets will do whatever it takes to buy that summer house…except of course NAME THE jew.9

      • JOE WEBB
        JOE WEBB says:

        ok Barking.

        Last Tuesday, while at Peets Coffee in downtown Menlo Park (next door to Palo Alto), noticed what appeared to be Victor Davis Hanson, the public intellectual/author from Stanford University. (His book on ancient Greece’s military culture, the phalanx, etc. is a great read).

        I asked him if he was Hanson, etc and he replied that he was. I congratulated him on his books, especially his book on Ancient Greece. He thanked me.

        I then asked him if he knew how many Palestinian folks have been killed by Israel in Gaza. He said, about 40,0000. I replied that the medical journal Lancet has been reporting more like 200,000 dead and wounded. He responded that he had been to Israel.

        I replied that I too had been to Israel and Gaza, and that just being somewhere is meaningless, unless books/study are part of the equation.

        No comment from Hanson. He then stated that he was just having his coffee.
        So, I refrained from insulting him, but told him that I had started out in life as a leftie, but became an anti-semite and a nationalist. No comment from Hanson.

        That is about it. He returned to his coffee. End of story. It is the “Gotta go now Socrates.”

        Hanson has the look of a berserker Viking, kind of strange looking. Of course I have a lot of berserker blood in me….and have to be careful that I don’t wind up in jail (which has happened before).

        I planted the seed a little bit, and Hanson has a big rep as a liberal academic and a jew lover, gets on the local jewrun PBS station and so on. As a phenotypic White Man with a Scandinavian name….you never know when the genes just might awaken.

        I did not ask him if his trips to Israel had been paid for by the Jews. Just gave him some space to possibly consider his jew love in the context of Gaza etc.

  8. Paracelsus88
    Paracelsus88 says:

    “…As of this writing, Iran is pounding Tel Aviv and sister cities. Does Iran actually have Oreshnik-like missiles?” (Mr. Webb’s post as of 4:55 P.M.)

    Establishment news reports purport that Iran is striking back (after all), and has been for the past 6-8 hours or more. They were caught by surprise and many security measures were indeed grossly neglected– according to many supporters of Iran. I am glad that Tucker Carlson and other widely-known personalities are speaking out.
    Trump has clearly cast his loyalty to the self-chosen “chosen” regardless of the deadly consequences for us all.

    The hard-core “Samson Option” Zionists and their “Christian Zionist” useful idiots may get their long-awaited “Armageddon”. It will be entirely man-made and have nothing to do with abstract beliefs, myths, and fairy tales.

    We here in America will be damn lucky to escape the worst of what’s coming as things cascade into chaos due to the “Samson Option” lunatics and their brainwashed “evangelicals”.

    Thank you.

  9. Joe WEbb
    Joe WEbb says:

    Douglas Macgregor said tonight that Iran is just using up all of its OLD missiles to draw out Israel’s counter-missiles thus paving the way for later when the Iranian new/modern missiles can be put to use against the Jews more effectively.

    This type of claim by Macgregor could be just propaganda, but I don’t think so, given Macgregor’s stature and general record of truth telling. Macgregor is presidential , hates Israel and does not have a love of Jews and especially AIPAC which controls the Senate.

    I love Macgregor, his military experience and his knowledge of the history of Russia and East Europe. He is about 73 or 74. He also claims that the USA has about 50 million illegal immigrants. Blue eyed Scots mesomorph warrior, a perfect White Man for President…when the jewish shit-eater Trump dies soon enough.

  10. Tom Sunic
    Tom Sunic says:

    White Gentiles in the EU and US appear to be deeply concerned about the plight of Gazans and civilian victims of IDF bombings in Iran. Fair enough. But shouldn’t the primary responsibility for response and solidarity lie with the hundreds of millions of Muslims in neighboring countries? So far, they seem to have shown limited concern for the suffering of their besieged racial and religious next of kin.

Comments are closed.