The UK Has Voted to Allow Anti-Social, Woke Women to End Their Bloodlines. Rejoice!
On 17th June 2025, after almost no debate whatsoever because it was merely a proposed amendment to a broader crime bill, the British parliament voted for the most liberal abortion laws in the world by a large majority. Even though abortion is only legal up to 24 weeks gestation, under this law women will not be prosecuted for ending their pregnancies, even if they are 9 months pregnant. Indeed, the baby may be late and, thus, normally already born at its level of gestation.
Apparently, the UK has been prosecuting women who are already very upset and vulnerable and such women should be above the law because of their “feelings.” The feelings of the mother come first, due to a number of prosecutions that have upset left-wing MPs, mainly female ones. For example, one woman, during Lockdown, told the doctor she was 6 weeks pregnant and obtained abortion pills. In reality, she was 26 weeks pregnant. She was prosecuted and was, inexplicably, found Not Guilty, even though she went to hospital and dishonestly claimed she’d had a late-term miscarriage rather than a still born induced by the pills.
A number of conservative UK commentators have remarked that this is, basically, legalised infanticide. Even left-wing firebrand George Galloway has tweeted that it marks the UK’s descent into Sodom. The British are now the Phoenicians, some have remarked, sacrificing their infants to Maloch.
I am sympathetic to these ideas. Naturally, the MP who proposed the bill was an extremely ugly woman; I mean literally circus ugly. From some photos, you’d genuinely think Tonia Antoniazzi was a man, while in others she is more like a fairy tale witch; vile both inside and out. I suspect that she is high in mutational load. This would explain both her physical repellence and her extreme left-wing and very low-empathy views. After all, as I have shown in my book Woke Eugenics, under pre-Industrial, harsh Darwinian conditions we were selecting for a Fitness Factor that included genetic mental health, physical health (a poor immune system means you won’t produce a symmetrical phenotype), and general conservatism, as this is associated with altruism, being pro-social and being group-oriented, vital under conditions of harsh group selection.
Tonia Antoniazzi
A variety of studies have shown, unsurprisingly, that on many markers left-wing people are genetically sick: more likely to be sickly children, uglier, shorter, more often mentally ill (especially high in anxiety and depression), and more likely to have Cluster B personality disorders such as Narcissism with its attendant low empathy. The genetic component of these kinds of psychological traits and conditions is at least 50%, based on twin studies, and in some traits it is even higher. And this leads to an interesting question. What is the psychological nature of the kinds of women that have abortions?
According to a 2014 study in Social Science and Medicine entitled “The role of stress, depression, and violence in subsequent pregnancies among women having a first abortion,” such women are high in anxiety and depression and also in emotional dysregulation. In other words, they are high in the Cluster B personality disorder known as Borderline Personality Disorder. Sufferers feel a constant sense of emptiness, intensely fear abandonment, and, centrally, are highly emotionally dysregulated. They behave like stereotypical naughty children: tantrums, attention-seeking, manipulation; anything to get what they feel they want in the moment. They are fickle, due to constant self-doubt, and prone to black and white thinking known as “splitting;” where you either love or hate the same person depending on your suddenly shifting moods. Clearly, these neurotic women are much more likely to be left-wing than conservative. These woman want abortions, and their offspring, had they lived, would very likely have been psychologically similar to themselves.
This study is line with a much earlier study, from 1992, “Personality Characteristics of Women Who Had Induced Abortions” in the journal Association for Interdisciplinary Research in Values and Social Change. It found that women who undergo abortion have a markedly different modal personality compared to those who do not. They score higher than controls on histrionic characteristics (dramatic attention-seeking), Narcissism (which includes low emotional empathy and low altruism) and antisocial personality (psychopathy, which also includes low emotional empathy and low altruism). So, females who have abortions, compared to controls, are likely to be unpleasant, anti-social people and these traits are significantly genetic.
They are also more likely to be left-wing. This is firstly because conservatives will be likely to eschew abortion for religious reasons or due to their higher empathy and sense of responsibility, and, secondly, because being left-wing is predicted by being mentally unstable and by having Cluster B personality disorders. This was found in the study “The Dark Triad traits predict authoritarian political correctness and alt-right attitudes” in the journal Heliyon. Leftists were high in Narcissism and Machiavellianism while the authoritarian, anti-freedom extreme right, who I’d aver are almost as bad as the far left, were high in the other Dark Triad trait, psychopathy.
But in essence, abortion involves nasty, anti-social, virtue-signalling left-wing women ending their own bloodlines in a context in which the traits involved are strongly genetic. Leftism itself is as much as 60% genetic. The law passed in the UK is, therefore, Woke Eugenics in action. It is eugenic.
Wokeness seems to be a group-level adaptation that will return deracinated, genetically sick Europeans to genetic health. Surely, the kind of women who want abortions should be allowed, nay, actively encouraged to have them. Think how selfish, nasty and unnatural you’d have to be to kill your baby at 9 months gestation, as English Law now effectively permits. And that baby will almost certainly grow up to be very like its mother. What can possibly be wrong with letting such a woman snuff-out her own bloodline?
Her offspring will not only be left-wing, and thus destructive of adaptive traditions that keep us in our evolutionary match and thus happy and safe, but, likely, criminally inclined. The study “The Dark Triad as a predictor of criminality: Evidence from the Add Health Study” in the Journal of Criminal Justice has demonstrated this in depth. Criminal behaviour is about 60% genetic. This law will reduce criminality. Indeed, according to “The impact of legalized abortion on crime” in the Quarterly Journal of Economics the legalization of abortion in the early 1970s in America is estimated to account for approximately 50% of the observed drop in crime rates between 1991 and 1997. Specifically, the study attributes a 20–25% reduction in violent crime and a similar reduction in property crime to increased abortion access.
Put simply, this law is a leap forward in the process of Woke Eugenics and the return to sanity. Conservatives should put their sentimentality aside and rejoice as more and more deeply unpleasant people remove themselves from gene pool. Rejoice!
Left-wing opinions are not in the DNA, but intelligence, creative gifts and physical health are inherited. For high-IQ females to go on birth-strike while Africans breed fecklessly and claim benefits for illegitimate offspring.
The “right” of women to kill babies however healthy just before, during or just after birth is a sign of social decadence.
This theory seems to apply to mid-to-upper income Whites … but how does this theory hold up when applied to blacks? Here in the US, for example, blacks are about 12-14% of our population, yet black women have more than 45% of all abortions … mexican women, too, have high abortion rates …
black abortion rates is the main reason I support abortion.
Some of the hardest right wing race realist I’ve met used to be left wing. Young people are very vulnerable to propaganda and the level of propaganda we are up against has never been greater. How many women will deeply regret their actions later on in life. Women have evolved to follow the dominant frame and how many will make mistakes simply because of the dominant ideas that shape society today.
Boomers are the most vulnerable.
Thanks. Sad to think of this, but it certainly is indicative of the judaicized civilization ruining all of western culture.
The previous Chief Rabbi of Britain deplored the devastating collapse of the White European Gentile birth-rate because of selfish hedonism. Fact.
But who cares about facts when all “jews” are non-humans who control everything except people who think so?
I was left wing by default before getting red-pilled, people can change quickly. I’m not sure allowing any White women to kill their babies is a wise idea when our collective birth rate is so low already.
great stuff. I admire your other work.
The problem with this line of thinking is that even more beautiful, intelligent, mentally and physically healthy white childrean will be murdered as a result of this new “law” (and other similar ones), not because their parents are genetically inferior (as the author suggests), but rather because they have been brainwashed by anti-white jews to believe in materialism, hedonism, degeneracy, white guilt and other cancers promoted by jew-“education”-system, jew-television, jew (anti)social media, jew-porn and so on, and so forth, rather than to be race idealists, who believe in White Race, and unconditionally want to create a future for her much better than this present jewish decadence brought to us by jews after (((their))) victory in 1945!
But their is also another side of the coin. Evil jews promote and legalize (((abortion of white kids))) among Whites, while in israel it’s illegal to abort jewish kid (to abort non-jewish kid is legal, of course). The same is true for (((usury))), alcohol and other drugs, (((porn))), (((contraception))), immigration, (((interracial sex))), lgbt-“values”, judaized popular “culture”, promoting guilt and self-hatred among Whites, presumably also with (jew-made?) processed junk “food” (I still remember this sick and disgusting anti-white (((pepsi)))-ad made by a jew) and so on, and so forth. What is the reason of double standards in (((their))) behavior? Do (((they))) want to destroy white race (while preserving their own race), or what?