Virginia Abernethy and I discuss Iran and Israel — The Political Cesspool, June 28

/6 Comments/in /by

Virginia Abernethy and I discuss the current state of the Israel-Iran conflict with James Edwards and Keith Alexander on The Political Cesspool, Saturday, June 28.

One point I want to stress is that I don’t think that the U.S.-Israel attacks set back Iran’s nuclear program all that much. This report notes:

The US military did not use bunker-buster bombs on one of Iran’s largest nuclear sites last weekend because the site is so deep that the bombs likely would not have been effective, the US’ top general told senators during a briefing on Thursday.

The comment by Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dan Caine, which was described by three people who heard his remarks and a fourth who was briefed on them, is the first known explanation given for why the US military did not use the Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb against the Isfahan site in central Iran. US officials believe Isfahan’s underground structures house nearly 60% of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile, which Iran would need in order to ever produce a nuclear weapon.

That’s not to say that the bombing didn’t set Iran back. But it does mean that we should expect more war, perhaps accompanied by another round of false intelligence that once again Iran is close to producing a bomb—the same sort of claims that Netanyahu has been making for over 30 years. Trump clearly wants a “one and done” operation and he has put great pressure on Israel to hold off, but neocons in Congress (Tom Cotton, Lindsay Graham, Randy Fine) and the media, like “Tel Aviv” Levin on Fox News, continue to beat the drums of war. Trump has not ruled out further military operations.

https://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/radio-show-hour-2-2025-06-28/

6 replies
  1. Anon
    Anon says:

    Unz.c*m/runz/a-forceful-russian-response-to-nato-recklessness/

    QUOTE:
    ______________________________________________________
    “Moreover, under official Russian military doctrine, any such conventional strike against the country’s nuclear arsenal could fully justify a nuclear response.”
    _______________________________________________________

    Which I believe shows that just having nuclear weapons is not enough to serve as a deterrent, but also the people and government having a genetic makeup which makes them willing to all die in a massive nuclear exchange. I don’t know if the Russian citizens themselves, a mix of many different races, have such genetics, but I speculate that Putin sure does not, which is why he very generously employs bluffs all the time, constantly drawing “red lines” for nuclear attack, but then doing nothing when constantly crossed. I believe that the West knows this about Putin and for this reason has no reason to hold back against Russia. Thus, the West can continue the war against Russia for decades to come crossing every “red line.” If Ukraine is completely taken over by Russia years into the future, then another East European nation, acting “alone” and not as part of NATO can take over the fight. A point may come when Russia becomes too exhausted and their citizens too tired of war, resulting in them voting for a different pro-NATO regime, or the military just overthrowing Putin or his successors. Russia could possibly also economically and/or demographically collapse. Their population could become majority Brown as Russia imports them to make up for millions of Slavs dying in the war. More Brown means more third-world-like and thus more weak, which is also part of the Western strategy against Russia.

    I’ve heard some suggest that Putin should remind the West about how powerful nuclear bombs are by just detonating one in the middle of an ocean and/or detonating one on the Moon or in space, but he won’t even do that. I suppose his argument would be that for the time being, Russia can still win the war with conventional weapons, so there is no need to destroy the biosphere as yet. Perhaps this is true, for now. But what about in the long run? How many years is Russia willing to continue the fight, especially if other Eastern European nations enter the war “independently?”

    QUOTE:
    _________________________________________________________
    “Fortunately, President Vladimir Putin’s government consists of extremely sober-minded and level-headed individuals, and they quickly deemphasized those attacks on their nuclear deterrent, instead choosing to focus upon other Ukrainian attacks against ordinary Russian civilian targets, which they angrily condemned as blatant terrorism.”
    __________________________________________________________

    As a civilian myself, the idea of me getting painfully bombed or starved to death by my food supply being bombed is terrifying for me to no end. That being said, why are “civilians” and “civilian infrastructure” not allowed to be targeted in war? War is between two nations, so one nation must destroy the other nation. The entire nation is the military, since the entire nation serves to build, sustain, and fund the weapons and the citizens actually pressing the buttons on the guns and missile launchers. “Civilians” vote for the wars, and even if part of the “civilian” population didn’t want the war, they continue to contribute to the economy that is facilitating the war. So then, in theory, why are “civilian” people and assets not allowed to be attacked? The International Israelite Community understands all of this, which is why they always decimate “civilian” people and assets in wars, such as in Palestine, Iraq, Germany, and Japan. And if “civilian” people and assets were attacked, the “civilians” would think twice about being so thoughtless about supporting politicians who want war.

    QUOTE:
    __________________________________________________________
    “So at the time, I confidently assumed that Hersh’s revelations would soon lead to the collapse of NATO.”
    __________________________________________________________

    I speculate that you may be giving too much credit to Gentile voters and overestimating their intellectual and emotional abilities. The entire West is run by a single intellectually brilliant tribal elite, and they have no reason to break up their empire.

    QUOTE:
    ____________________________________________
    The Russians could announce their plans for a hypersonic missile strike against the NATO headquarters building in Brussels, Belgium, with the attack scheduled for 12 noon in three days’ time.
    ____________________________________________

    But didn’t the world already just witness more primitive Iranian hypersonic missiles easily penetrate Israel’s triple-layer anti-missile system and whatever anti-missile systems NATO gave to Israel? I think the world already knows that hypersonic missiles can’t be stopped. So, I would argue that this war is now in the realm of the Spirit World – and Israelite people now are not driven just by scientific reasoning, but a Spiritual belief in winning the war even if they all die in the process by destroying the biosphere in a nuclear war, as long as they take all the Russians and other Gentiles with them. The Israelites must Spiritually bring Honor to their people and ancestors by fulfilling their destiny of ruling over all the Gentiles, even if they must also all die in the process, for such a death would be more Honorable than to fail and remain alive. So, do the Russians and Putin feel the same way? My speculation is that they don’t, and thus will eventually 100% capitulate to the West.

  2. Anon
    Anon says:

    I simply cannot fathom the innate mental traits of a people that would choose to “ride” all this out, continuing to have children and continuing to remain in the region when your whole region is a constant torture camp, not just in the last few months, but for many years. All the Palestinians knew that this end-game was coming, yet they still chose to have children and put them through all of this. I suppose it’s just extreme evolutionary adaptive genes – reproduce under any condition, and keep on fighting until the torturous moment of death.

    If I was born in Palestine, once I understand my fate, I would have immediately left the area, either through emigration or by simply relocating my Soul to the After-Life. But then, I am an extremely genetically maladaptive individual.

    And all the other Arab nations just watch all this happen without offering to take in the Palestinians. Makes me wonder how much sympathy all the non-Palestinian Arabs actually deserve. Netanyahu has asked surrounding Arabs to take in the Palestinians, but they all refused.

  4. Tim
    Tim says:

    Bolshewikipedia makes unquestioning use of the typical “reputable” sources: “In 2012, the Anti-Defamation League referred to Abernathy as an ‘unabashed white supremacist’, and the Southern Poverty Law Center called her a ‘full-fledged professor of hate,’ adding her to a list of 30 new activists heading the radical right.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Abernethy

    James Edward’s interesting quote: “Sam Dickson often uses the Greek maxime ‘You are blessed to be able to see yourself the way others see you. The Jews have never received that gift.'” https://www.perplexity.ai/search/hello-WGPGBE0yRQCHQohkTqmlCQ

Comments are closed.