Are the English Finally Fighting Back Against the Invasion?

English people don’t generally fly their national flag. Flying the national flag shows a need to assert yourself; it implies that you are under threat in some way and that you must mark your territory and rally the troops. Twenty years ago, when I was at university in Scotland, you’d see Scottish flags everywhere. Scotland is a small, relatively poor nation that was long ago subsumed into an England-dominated union. Of course Scotland must assert itself. England, by contrast, was secure in its own importance as the dominant nation in an empire that once ruled a quarter of the globe. You relatively rarely saw the Union Jack (the British flag) in England, let alone the St George’s flag of England.

But since the British government has deliberately allowed England to be invaded since New Labour began a de facto left-wing revolution in 1997, you have started to see more and more England flags dotted about. (The government allowed the invasion because it wishes to signal its adherence to the “marginalised” and push down the wages of English workers who decreasingly vote Labour.) The English, understandably, feel under threat: their territory is being invaded, entire areas of large cities such as London or Birmingham are, in essence, Pakistani enclaves, traditional English liberties are crushed with anti-free-speech laws to protect the Black and Muslim clients of the Labour Party, at least 25% of people in England are not White let alone ethnically English and the capital is now majority foreign. England has fallen, just as it once did to the Danes.

The Empire is long behind them and the English are realising that they, like the Scottish, must rally the troops around the flag and assert themselves if they are to survive at all. The Anti-British government of Keir Starmer is, as far as I can see, an accelerationist regime. Since 1997, the destruction of the traditional England has involved clever salami tactics, for the traitor Tony Blair was nothing if not a political genius. The transformation was too slow and too subtle for there to ever be a serious reaction.

Starmer is far less intelligent than Blair, as are those that surround him. He has made it clear to the working-class English, those who still believe in the nation, that he hates them. For getting upset about the massacre of three little girls by an ethnic-Rwandan in 2024, they are nothing more than “far right thugs” who must be jailed for their emotive tweets, even if they are immediately deleted. But if, during the process, a Black Labour councillor incites the murder of the rioters to a crowd then he is given bail (unlike Lucy Connolly, who posted an anti-immigrant tweet) and then found not guilty after the jury are directed by an openly Woke and pro-diversity female judge.

Two-tier Keir has given us two-tier justice; the Labour government despises the English people. But to continue the acceleration, “migrants” (young South Asian and African men) are permitted — hundreds of them a day — to cross from France and be processed for asylum even though France is a safe country; akin to the US accepting refugees from Canada. With nowhere else to put them, they are placed it hotels; often quite nice ones. This has meant that, very suddenly, scores of completely White towns in the shires have experienced the joys of diversity: young migrants hanging around schools and raping teenage girls; they’re not veiled, after all.

This has led to protests and riots outside “migrant hotels” with the state making this much worse by having police chaperone far-left “counter-protestors” — assorted Woke mutants with purple hair brought in to scream about how “racist” everyone is. In Nuneaton, in the Midlands, where a schoolgirl was raped, the crowd was so infuriated by them that they were literally run out of town, with the police — now widely seen as an anti-British enforcers anyway — desperately trying to protect them.

The St George’s flag was a common sight at these protests, one of which has worked: the migrant hotel in Epping (north of London, teenager raped) has been shut down. However, it appears that this set off, on about 16th August, “Operation Raise the Colours,” an idea which spread via Twitter and social contagion.

To assert that it’s England, a group of men started putting up English and British flags on lampposts in Birmingham, specifically in the White area of Northfield. This spread to Tower Hamlets in London, which is overwhelmingly Bangladeshi and where you’ll frequently see Palestine and Bangladeshi flags. To make things worse, and to make it absolutely clear that, for the authorities, England is conquered and its ideology is Woke (as symbolised by the rainbow flag, allowed to fly everywhere), Birmingham Council, which is bankrupt and can’t collect the rubbish, promptly sent in workers to remove flags, while leaving Palestine flags well alone, naturally. Tower Hamlets Council, making it clear that they are a Bangladeshi enclave, made it plain any flags (actually only British ones, though) would be immediately removed, and they were.

But, naturally, this only galvanised the campaign and underscored the point it was making; parts of England are held by foreigners and the White traitors who collaborate with them (Labour and pretty much all of the political class) to dictate to the true English. And the English must fight back. Elsewhere in Birmingham, a mini-roundabout was painted with the St George’s Flag. This was promptly removed with the anti-British BBC referring to it as “vandalised,” which it doesn’t when rainbow flags are painted in public. This led to online jokes about how potholes will be filled in if you paint them with the St George’s flag and bin bags will be collected if they are marked with the same.

Now, however, there was little stopping this outbreak of English patriotism; this mass-marking of territory. Lines of lampposts all over the country suddenly had the St George’s or Union flags flying from them. Farmers sprayed their sheep with red crosses, to be seen from motorways and country roads.

The left were put in an impossible situation. English patriotism is sufficiently popular that they can’t admit that they hate it and fear it. They want to control it; it’s allowed, occasionally, if there’s football. But spontaneous and uncontrolled, it is deeply frightening to a paranoid, authoritarian, internationalist state that despises everything about England, including the average English working man (he is a “far right thug”). Some were moved, aggressively, to say it represented an aggressive act by the “far right;” they were presumably aggressive due to the cognitive dissonance: “I hate the English even though I am one; I mustn’t but I do.” All of this is happening in a context in which serious people, such as the independent Member of Parliament Rupert Lowe, are discussing the forced remigration of immigrants.

Could England be waking up before it’s too late? I hope so. Has Starmer caused this by bringing about “too much, too soon” and openly showing his contempt for ordinary English people? Yes, he has. We can only hope that, as the summer passes and it gets colder, this “reaction” by the ordinary English against thirty years of psychological abuse by their government and its purple-haired, Karen Stasi does not fizzle out.

22 replies
  1. Timothy Webb
    Timothy Webb says:

    All very true – apart from the fact that the British flag is the Union Flag, not the Union Jack, which is the same thing flying at the jackstaff of a warship – not that we have any.

    • Kevin MacDonald
      Kevin MacDonald says:

      I didn’t realize that and took it down. I agree it’s ordinary English. It’s amazingly difficult to find photos of normal people protesting the migrant hotels.

      • English Patriot
        English Patriot says:

        With respect, Dr MacDonald, there have been quite a few, especially in the DAILY MAIL (not entirely “right-wing” with its same-gender & mixed-race blind-date, and the usual Naughty Nazi articles, though beginning to criticise Israel).
        The “refugees welcome” street opposition is always and everywhere organised by “far left” groups like “Socialist Worker”.

    • John Zitnik
      John Zitnik says:

      hopefully not too late.. but in that, I’m not an optimist.. I mean.. really! You didn’t see this coming 30 years ago? WTF?

  2. Tim
    Tim says:

    The cuckoo is a parasitic bird that lays its eggs in other birds’ nests and has them incubated by birds of other species, whose chicks it then throws out of the nest. This inevitably brings to mind images of “migrant hotels”. But who might the “cuckoo’s father” be? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DasikXHVqY

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14700045/hotels-taxpayers-asylum-seekers-four-star-Israeli-tycoon.html

    AI tells:

    The cuckoo has long been associated with the devil in various cultural traditions, often serving as a stand-in name to avoid directly mentioning the devil himself. In many old folk beliefs and sayings, people used the word “cuckoo” as a milder substitute because saying the devil’s name was thought to summon him. Phrases like “Go to the cuckoo!” functioned much like saying “Go to the devil!” without the direct blasphemy.

    Beyond this linguistic substitution, the cuckoo’s behavior also contributed to its dark reputation. The bird’s notorious habit of laying its eggs in other birds’ nests and evicting the rightful offspring was seen as a symbol of deceit, betrayal, and parasitism. Such traits naturally linked it with the devil, who traditionally embodies trickery and moral corruption.

    Despite its role as a harbinger of spring and symbol of renewal in some cultures, the cuckoo’s image remained ambivalent. In popular superstition, it could represent misfortune and cunning, earning nicknames like “devil’s messenger.” Many expressions reflected both fascination and fear, showing how deeply the bird’s symbolism runs in folklore.

    In essence, the cuckoo’s connection to the devil reveals how human cultures use natural phenomena to express complex ideas about good, evil, trust, and betrayal. The bird’s call echoes not only through forests but also through the rich tapestry of language and myth, embodying both charm and warning.

  3. Spectromancer
    Spectromancer says:

    How is this different from the US where blacks can kill or assault whites at will with few, if any, consequences? They can even become rich from it.

    • Michel Martin
      Michel Martin says:

      @ Ed Welch
      The Zios must be mentioned everywhere, from weather forecasts to children’s cartoons. After all, they are BEHIND everything from forest fires in Australia to road accidents in Alaska, planning the extermination of everyone else on the earth, moon, Mars and the Milky Way.

      • WayOutThere
        WayOutThere says:

        Michael Martin- I know right! Everyone knows zios have no power no influence no wealth. Anyone who thinks zios are bad has eaten too many anti semitic canards! Yuck! They are jealous because the zios are the chosen people- who gave the world wonderful gifts like gravity, ice cream and musical theater!
        Darn those zio Haters!!!!

        Everyone knows that the Amway corporation is behind all the evil in the world!
        Do you know if you rearrange the letters in AMWAY and change some of them it spells SATAN????

        Mind blowing!

        • Michel Martin
          Michel Martin says:

          Behind some things, not every thing.
          Not musical theatre (Wagner top). Nor ice cream (Buontalenti wop).
          Not bad weather, mosquitos, fireworks, black pudding, flush toilets.
          Usury, Bolshevism, Psychoanalysis & the Atom Bomb, Yes.
          Powerful, but not invincible.

          • English Patriot
            English Patriot says:

            Not all singing from the same Zemirot sheet:
            “Starmer… In his affluent North London constituency…home to the Guardian newspaper offices…he is insulated from the disruption caused by a massive influx of young men from Africa and Africa…. More migrants and asylum seekers are arriving in their thousands every week. [But] A real threat of deportation will mean people don’t come in the first place.” – Dr Alan Mendoza, Jewish Founder-Director of the Henry Jackson Society, “Daily Mail”, August 25.

  4. Freddy
    Freddy says:

    Where is the usual politically correct social outcry and accompanying articles of outrage in the newspaper: “Innocent migrant brutally and recklessly hit by parked driverless vehicle!” What is that stupid car, manufactured by white racists, doing standing there, obstructing the flow of bicycle traffic! This calls for immediate and tangible consequences against hate crimes! The rule of law must finally take decisive action!
    https://www.amren.com/videos/2025/08/the-state-against-the-nation/?ht-comment-id=27515236

  5. Emma Smith
    Emma Smith says:

    Read Rod Liddle’s “A few things worth flagging…” The Spectator, 23 August.
    “Controlled” opposition. Some control, some opposition!

  6. Anon
    Anon says:

    Unz.c*m/article/on-the-need-for-eugenics/

    Quote:
    _________________________________________
    (5) Just as in the case of the Flynn Effect, there doesn’t seem to be any real-world empirical evidence that intelligence has been rapidly dropping over the last few generations and there’s no biological or dysgenic mechanism that could possibly explain it, so it’s probably just a different testing artifact.
    _________________________________________

    Like I already posted, the drop of one IQ point per decade is not based on standard paper and pencil tests, but based on neural processing and sensory tests that have then be converted to IQ scores. These tests are reaction time tests, color discernment tests, auditory discernment tests, and weight estimation tests where a person are given a series of hand-held weights where they have to them rank them in order from lightest to heaviest. The higher the IQ, the less errors people make on these tests. No Flynn Effect on these tests – we can get right to actual biology. Plus, the final biological evidence is polygenic scores of a sample of more than 100,000 people in Iceland, which showed an IQ loss of about 1 point per decade.

    And then there are tests of working memory, 3-dementional rotational ability, and complex vocabulary use. All of this shows about a loss of one IQ point per decade. Now, I don’t understand the mathematics of any of this, but I assume that Woodley of Menie and the many scientists he references do. What they have done here is in many ways circumvent the many problems of pen/paper tests and the Flynn Effect problem by using more basic level neural/sensory tests. The totality of all the above mentioned tests show a loss of around one IQ point per decade. All the above is described in detail at https://altcensored.com/watch?v=9paqiEcV8Ko The mathematics are explained in detail.

    On an anecdotal note, for those who can’t imagine people are getting dumb at such a fast rate, how many of these doubters actually “get out of their ivory towers” and try talking to ordinary people? As unintelligent as I already am, I have to “dumb-down” myself so much more when talking to typical ethnic Europeans, and much more when dealing with Mestizos (and I won’t even mention Africans). And just look at the types of politicians that Americans vote for, politicians who just use “catch phrases” which is adequate for voters to then vote for them. Knowing how stupid voters are, politicians don’t even bother with any intellectual arguments for why they are doing what they do. When did Trump or Biden ever actually given a public intellectual argument? Now, what kind of typical conversations among the public can we imagine occurred in the 1700s and 1800s?

Comments are closed.