Blacks to the Max: Exploring How Hatred, Hostility and Hierarchy Power the Leftist Sacralization of Blacks

“Preach Equality, Practise Hierarchy.” That’s one of the core principles of modern leftism. In leftist theory, Blacks are equal to Whites and women are equal to men. In leftist practice, Blacks are privileged over Whites and women are privileged over men. And so, in a leftist system, you get a hierarchy of racial and sexual privilege with Black women right at the top and White men right at the bottom. When you understand that, you can psychoanalyze the semiotics of the Blatant Black Bullshit below. It’s the cover of a children’s book called Brilliant Black British History (2023), which claims, inter alia, that the first inhabitants of Britain were Black and that Blacks have been an essential part of British history ever since. Despite this bullshit — or rather, because of this bullshit — Brilliant Black British History won the prize for Children’s Non-Fiction Book of the Year at the British Book Awards in 2024. Here is the cover of that award-winning book:

Blatant Black Bullshit: the cover of Brilliant Black British History (2023)

When we scan the cover of a book, our eyes travel from top to bottom and from left to right. That’s why the cover of Brilliant Black British History features a big Black woman at the top, where our eyes start scanning, and a smaller Black woman raising a revolutionary fist at the bottom right, where our eyes stop scanning. It’s a visual proclamation of Black female supremacy by a pair of egomaniac Black supremacists. Note also that only one White appears on the cover, a woman who’s dwarfed by the Black woman behind her. White men don’t appear on the cover at all. In Orwellian terms, White men have been unpersoned, removed from British history in just the way that the Black female author and Black male illustrator of that book would like to see.

Mononomous Nigerian author Atinuke and her Blatant Black Bullshit (image from British Blacklist)}

Indeed, I’m sure the author, Atinuke, and illustrator, Kingsley Nebechi, would like to go further in their Blatant Black Bullshit, because there’s an implicit irony in the absence of White men from the cover. White men aren’t there, but the products of White male genius are. There’s a castle, there’s Stonehenge, there’s a sailing ship, a fighter-plane and a big red London bus.[1] All of those things were created by White men and depend on things that White men either invented or perfected, like masonry, metallurgy, engineering and the internal combustion engine, powered flight, industrial chemistry, and so on. And what about the clothes the figures are wearing? Again, they’re the creations of White men — the fabrics, the dyes, the ornaments, the machines and trading networks that produce them. If they could, the author and illustrator would attribute all those things to non-existent Black female genius, not to actual White male genius. Ironically enough, we can turn to a White male genius for a satirical summary of this Black supremacist psychology. Evelyn Waugh (1903–66) was a comic genius and you can find some of his best comedy in a novel called Scoop (1938):

“Can I see the Ishmaelite consul-general, please?”

“Are you from the Press?”

“Yes, I suppose in a way I am.”

“Come in. I’m him. As you see we are a little understaffed at the moment.”

The consul-general led him into what had once been the servants’ hall. Photographs of Negroes in uniform and ceremonial European dress, hung on the walls. Samples of tropical produce were disposed on the table and along the bookshelves. There was a map of Ishmaelia, an eight piece office suite and a radio. William sat down. The consul-general turned off the music and began to talk.

“The patriotic cause in Ishmaelia,” he said, “is the cause of the coloured man and of the proletariat throughout the world. The Ishmaelite worker is threatened by corrupt and foreign coalition of capitalist exploiters, priests and imperialists. As that great Negro Karl Marx has so nobly written…” He talked for about twenty minutes. The black-backed, pink-palmed, fin-like hands beneath the violet cuffs flapped and slapped. “Who built the Pyramids?” he asked. “Who invented the circulation of the blood?… Africa for the African worker, Europe for the African worker, Asia, Oceania, America, Arctic and Antarctic for the African worker.”

At length he paused and wiped the line of froth from his lips.

“I came about a visa,” said William diffidently.

“Oh,” said the consul-general, turning on the radio once more. “There’s fifty pounds deposit and a form to fill in.” (Evelyn Waugh, Scoop, 1938, chapter 4)

That’s excellent satire of the narcissism and megalomania of Black supremacists — and of the Marxism that encourages it. Still, it’s natural enough for Blacks to boost themselves like that. Yet although Black supremacism is central to modern Western leftism, most leftists aren’t Black. In particular, Jews aren’t Black and Jews have been the most important group in modern leftism and in the promotion of Black supremacism and Black privilege. Even as leftist Jews like Stephen Jay Gould, Richard Lewontin, Leon Kamin, Steven Rose and Ashley Montagu (né Israel Ehrenberg) were “Preaching Equality” and denying the existence of race, other leftist Jews were “Practising Hierarchy” and working to turn Blacks into the most privileged, praised and pampered group in Western society.

Israel Ehrenberg used the nom de goy Ashley Montagu to preach equality to gullible goyim

As Kevin MacDonald has documented, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in America was run and funded not by Blacks, but by Jews. In Britain, the Jewish lawyer Anthony Lester (1936–2020) proudly described how he brought the American model of Black Boosterism to Britain:

In Search of Something Better: Anthony Lester recalls the creation of the Commission for Racial Equality

In 1964, on my return from witnessing the “Long Hot Summer” of civil rights action in the American South, I helped found CARD (the Campaign Against Racial Discrimination). We campaigned for effective legislation to combat racism in Britain. The first measure — the Race Relations Act 1965 — was hopelessly narrow and lacked teeth, so we fought for something better. When CARD was taken over by militant extremists, in December 1967, Jim Rose [another Jewish lawyer] and I founded the Runnymede Trust to combat racial prejudice and promote policies for overcoming racial discrimination and disadvantage. Labour’s second measure, the Race Relations Act 1968, was broader in scope but still lacked teeth. So again we campaigned for something better. (Catalyst magazine, 20th November 2006)

By “better,” Lester meant “better for invading non-Whites, worse for native Whites.” He was praised in his Guardian obituary as “the author of the groundbreaking legislation on racial and gender equality introduced in Britain by Harold Wilson’s Labour government in the 1970s.” But why should Jews work so hard for Blacks? To understand that, you need to understand that, unlike Blacks themselves, Jews and other non-Black leftists don’t truly see Blacks as Blacks. Instead, they see Blacks as what you might call un-Whites, that is, as the antithesis of Whites. Jewish promotion of Black supremacism and Black privilege isn’t an act of love and support for Blacks, but an act of hatred and hostility towards Whites. Blacks are the most harmful, obnoxious, unintelligent, unattractive and unproductive of all minorities in Western societies. And, by definition, Blacks have dark skin. In other words, they are the group that least resembles Whites in appearance, behavior, achievement and societal worth, which is precisely why the hostile Jewish elite selected Blacks for transformation into the archetypal saintly victims of alleged White oppression.

Wall-to-Wall Anti-Whiteness

However, that hostile Jewish elite wasn’t selecting Blacks as Blacks, but Blacks as un-Whites, as the group least resembling and most harmful for Whites. You can apply the same analysis to Jewish work on behalf of Muslims, whom Jews have repeatedly hailed as “natural allies” of themselves. Just as Jews see Blacks as un-Whites, so they see Muslims as un-Christians. Jews and the leftism they’ve molded are not motivated by love of Blacks and Islam, but by hatred of Whites and Christianity. Once you understand this, you can properly understand what Nick Griffin calls “wall-to-wall miscegenation in every advert.” Why do the media in general, and advertising in particular, have a policy of Blacks-to-the-Max, of encouraging Whites to mix with Blacks and to regard Blacks as ideal partners for marriage and child-bearing? As Griffin explains, it’s not because the leftists in the media and advertising love Blacks, but because they hate Whites and want to drown White nations beneath a flood of mud. However, Griffin makes an important further point. Why is advertising so blatant in its Black Boosterism? Griffin explains it like this:

It’s very simple — it’s because they know that it is so unnatural. Their obsession is based on the fear that it will not work and that, the moment they stop, human nature will immediately return. This is a propaganda deluge based not just on hate, but also on fear.

If their propaganda upsets you for 30 seconds, then how do you think they feel when they see that, despite their repeating it morning, noon and night, the vast majority of marriages and childbirths are still between mono-ethnic partners? (“Sick of TV’s ‘Kalergi Plan Breaks’?,” Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale, 13th November 2025)

Griffin goes on to explain how and why Black Boosterism will Backfire. In essence, it will fail because it’s “so unnatural.” Leftism is, in the final analysis, a revolt against nature, against normality and health, against what Hilaire Belloc called the “indissoluble Trinity of Truth, Beauty and Goodness.” This revolt against nature explains an apparent contradiction in the leftist hierarchy. Let’s return to my analysis of the leftist principle of “Preach Equality, Practise Hierarchy.” In leftist theory, Blacks are equal to Whites, women are equal to men, and gays are equal to straights. In leftist practice, Blacks, women and gays are privileged over Whites, men and straights. And so, in a leftist system, you should get a hierarchy of racial and sexual privilege with gay Black women right at the top and straight White men right at the bottom.  However, as I pointed out in “Power to the Perverts” and “A Clown Called Chleo,” some straight White men have hacked the hierarchy and risen far above a Black-Jewish lesbian in the eyes of Clown World’s British franchise.

Hating Truth, Loving Lies

How on Earth could this happen? Doesn’t it contradict what I said about the leftist hierarchy of privilege for Blacks, women and gays? In fact, no, it doesn’t. Not on a deeper analysis. The core underlying principle of leftism is to champion the unnatural, abnormal and ugly. That’s why the Black-Jewish lesbian in question, Linda Bellos (born 1950), did so well for so long in the leftist system. But then she came up against a group that was even more unnatural, abnormal and ugly than she is, namely, “transwomen,” or male perverts who claim to be women. Naturally — or unnaturally — enough, leftism sides with the male perverts, not the Black lesbian.

Black-Jewish lesbian Linda Bellos when she was still at the head of the hierarchy (image from Amazon)

Bellos is a TERF, a Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist. She denies that men can become women. In particular, she denies that men can be lesbians. And she’s perfectly correct to do so, which is precisely why Clown World — the vast system of leftism that currently rules the West — turned against her and other TERFs. Clown World hates truth and loves lies. Therefore Clown World hates those who say “Men can’t be women” and loves those who say “Transwomen are women.” Yes, Linda Bellos is a gay Black woman and should be right at the top of the leftist hierarchy. But on one vital matter she refused to deny nature and to accept leftist lies. Therefore Clown World removed her privilege and elevated some straight White men above her. In the final analysis, it’s the revolt against nature that counts in leftism. Transwomen are more unnatural than Black lesbians, therefore transwomen are higher in the leftist hierarchy.[2] Even when those transwomen are stale pale straight males.

This revolt against nature explains why leftism will fall. The stale pale male Nick Griffin is pointing that out directly in 2025. But another stale pale male pointed it out indirectly long ago. He was a Roman poet called Horace and he boasted that his verse was aere perennius — “more lasting than bronze.” He was right, because two thousand years later we’re still marveling at the truth and elegance of lines like Naturam expellas furca, tamen usque recurret — “You can drive Nature out with a pitchfork, but she will always return.” Leftism has revolted against Nature, therefore leftism will fall.

[1]  The big red bus is there because Blacks saved Britain from collapse by driving buses after the war.

[2]  Nevertheless, Blackness and lesbianism are both natural categories in a way that transgenderism can never be. See “A Clown Called Chleo” for further discussion.