Elon Musk Channels the New Right: The Titan’s Hammer Smashes the Overton Window
I have long felt that, because of his vast fortune, Elon Musk could be a critically important force on our side. This article makes clear that Musk is quite aware of the perilous situation Whites are in. And he has the money to fund political candidates who will act in our interests. Politics in the democratic West always comes down to money, as our current hostile elite is well aware. And he has plenty enough to change the political culture and quite possibly create a new pro-White elite.
Arktos: Elon Musk Channels the New Right
The Titan’s Hammer Smashes the Overton Window

Malen Manya argues that Elon Musk’s recent statements and role are like a battering ram and megaphone for the New Right, unleashing the discourse to address the mass migration, crime, and tyrannical censorship endangering European peoples.
In the gathering storm of Western erasure, where the ancient bloodlines of Europe are diluted and demonized under the guise of “progress,” a Promethean force rises to shatter the illusions.
Elon Musk, forged in the crucible of South African strife and now aspiring architect of empires beyond the stars, has emerged as a thunderous voice against the anti-White abyss. His unyielding decrees — “Call them out for the anti-White racists they are every time they do it” — serve not as mere commentary, but as a weapon for the New Right’s arsenal.
Musk doesn’t equivocate; he exposes the rigged game where European heritage is the sole permissible target, and he puts forth demands: “Anti-White, anti-male discrimination ends now.”
This is the call our folk have awaited: a hard-hitting voice whose words amplify the raw truth, empowering nationalists to dismantle the Bolshevik echoes that seek our dissolution.
We do not presume to know Musk’s deepest intentions, but he has cracked open a door through the Overton wall — one we must seize and widen, turning his words into momentum for our cause. Even as X complies with pressures like the UK’s Online Safety Act, implementing age checks amid criticisms of free speech infringement, and unfortunately continues silencing and banning many pro-Whites from its platform, Musk’s personal fire burns undimmed, offering an opening we must exploit before regulatory withers erode it further. With this precarious foothold, we reclaim our Dasein—our rooted being in soil, culture, and kin—against the rootless elites’ genocidal entropy.
Nowhere is this contrast more stark than in the UK, which Musk has bluntly declared “a police state” — a prison island where dissent against the anti-White regime is criminalized, and the apparatus of control turns Britons into inmates in their own homeland. In his recent salvo on December 4, echoing the outrage over tyrannical crackdowns on free speech and protest, Musk amplified the truth: the UK has devolved into a surveillance nightmare, jailing citizens for memes, posts, and thoughts that challenge the multicultural flood eroding European identity. This isn’t hyperbole; it’s the grim reality where “hate speech” laws serve as shackles, selectively enforced to muzzle White advocates while anti-White vitriol flows unchecked. Musk’s indictment cuts to the core, exposing how the state prioritizes alien invaders over indigenous folk, transforming Britain into a dystopian cage where resistance invites the boot.
The anti-White reality is no abstraction; it’s a calculated purge, where our bravest defenders are crushed under the boot of ideology. Across the White world, men and women who dare hail the truth of demographic warfare and cultural sabotage are hailed not as guardians but as criminals — jailed, exiled, and silenced by a system that weaponizes “empathy” to erode our very existence.
In the UK’s prison state, this manifests with chilling efficiency: consider Katie Hopkins, the indomitable commentator ousted from her media perches for eviscerating the anti-White dogma woven into immigration policies and societal decay. Fired from LBC in 2017 for her blunt truths post-Manchester bombing, and facing venue cancellations in 2025 amid blackmail campaigns targeting her shows, Hopkins embodies professional exile — blacklisted for refusing to bow to the equity idols that prioritize invaders over indigenous Europeans. Her plight is emblematic of a broader clampdown, where thousands have been arrested for online posts criticizing mass migration, their homes raided at dawn by thought police enforcing draconian laws that echo Soviet gulags. Musk’s “police state” label vindicates these victims, highlighting how the regime imprisons dissenters to preserve the demographic siege on White Britain.
This tyranny echoes across the Anglosphere, amplified by hypocritical responses to the very invasions our folk decry. In Australia, the regime’s gun grab — disarming law-abiding Europeans under the pretext of “safety” following imported violence — strips our people of self-defense while flooding the continent with incompatible aliens. Worse still, new antisemitism laws, rammed through as a knee-jerk to European Muslim influxes and their jihadist excesses, prioritize shielding Semitic interests over the survival of White Europeans.
Seriously? As Whites are systematically replaced through demographic warfare, the universalists cry “antisemitism” as their response, wielding it as a cudgel to silence criticism of the invaders? White Europeans are not Semitic — our blood, soil, and heritage demand protection from this alien tide, not diversionary laws that protect outsiders while our kin are displaced and disarmed. These measures aren’t justice; they’re capitulation, ensuring Europeans remain vulnerable to the great replacement engineered by rootless elites.
Musk illuminates this tyranny with surgical precision, channeling the philosopher’s gaze into the void. “Why is Western media so anti-White and anti-Asian?” he demands, unmasking the Leviathan that feasts on our heritage while ignoring genocidal chants. Drawing from his South African roots, he unveils the horror: “South Africa now has more anti-White laws than Apartheid had anti-Black laws.” Amid unpunished calls for White genocide — “kill the whites” — he retorts, “Oh I guess it’s ok to chant ‘kill the whites’ then!!??”
The silence from global elites is deafening, yet Musk prophesies the stakes: “If current trends continue, Whites will go from being a small minority of world population today to virtually extinct!” This is racial realism incarnate, a first jolt towards Heideggerian awakening to the demographic siege where our people are a shrinking minority yet face over 100 discriminatory laws in places like South Africa. Musk mocks the double standard: “Why can’t you blame any culture in the world, except Western culture? Doesn’t that seem odd?”
And he nails the mechanism: “When the radical left can’t win via democratic vote, they abuse the legal system to jail their opponents. This is their standard playbook throughout the world.” Excessive regulations make everything illegal, enabling “selective enforcement” and lawfare against dissenters, appointing “social activists” to judicial thrones. “Racism of any kind is wrong, obviously including anti-White racism,” he affirms, rejecting the hypocrisy that allows public genocide calls without punishment.
This anti-White crusade extends to the justice system itself, a bulwark turned betrayal where leniency masquerades as compassion but disproportionately ravages European heartlands. Musk’s unflinching stance on sovereignty cuts through: responding to the outrage over a Kentucky child killer’s early release — only to reoffend — he declared: “Absolutely. Murder in cold blood with unequivocal guilt should result in swift execution.” Such calls expose how “equity”-driven sentencing and soft-on-crime policies enable chaos in White communities, prioritizing alien predators over native victims.
This isn’t mere outrage — it’s a manifesto in miniature, aligning seamlessly with the New Right’s unapologetic Nationalism. At its core, our movement rejects the effete cosmopolitanism that treats borders as suggestions and justice as a revolving door. We demand a republic that prioritizes its own: the innocent families terrorized by predators, the communities gutted by unchecked violence, and the sovereign right of a nation to excise its most irredeemable threats. Musk’s endorsement of “swift execution” isn’t vigilante rhetoric; it’s the logical endpoint of a worldview that sees the state not as a nanny, but as a vigilant guardian wielding the sword of retribution.
Musk’s intervention arrives at a pivotal moment. With the outcomes of Trump’s second term looming and a resurgent GOP purging RINO equivocation, the New Right stands poised to redefine justice as an extension of sovereignty. Imagine a federal framework: mandatory minimums for migrant-linked crimes, AI-vetted swift trials for heinous acts, and executions reserved for the irrefutably guilty — streamlined, humane, and irrevocable. This isn’t vengeance; it’s vitality, ensuring that the blood of innocents fertilizes not chaos, but order.
The New Right has warned that unchecked immigration and defunded policing turn our lands into battlegrounds, yet reformers peddle rehabilitation myths while our folk bleed. Nationalism demands unyielding protection: why warehouse the irredeemable when swift justice preserves the vulnerable? In states enforcing capital punishment judiciously, crime plummets — data-driven proof that strength excises weakness to safeguard the whole. In the UK’s prison state, this inversion is acute: violent offenders from migrant backgrounds receive slaps on the wrist, while White protesters languish in cells for “stirring hatred,” their sentences a deterrent to any who question the great replacement.
These threads weave into the New Right’s tapestry: a fierce defense of identity, where Musk’s hammer strikes to the tune of the core of our struggle. His interventions arrive at a resurgent moment, with forces purging equivocation and redefining sovereignty. Imagine wielding his voice to free our imprisoned kin and dismantle anti-laws that gut free speech under “hate” pretexts.
Elon Musk, whether he claims the mantle or not, is now a standard-bearer in this fight. His platform, X, while still limited in its democratization of dissent and still facing regulatory concessions, allows for raw truths to pierce the Overton window. For nationalists, it’s vindication: the future isn’t written by Davos dreamers, but by doers who build rockets, borders, and unbreakable resolve.
Fellow Europeans, Musk isn’t just tweeting; he’s forging our path through woke wilderness. Heed his call: expose the anti-White racists, reclaim the narrative, stare into the abyss, and rebuild. Anti-White prejudice ends now, or we vanish in the entropy.





Musk takes Zio orders.
Musk attended Hebrew school as a child. Kinda odd for a gentile no?
“Worse still, new antisemitism laws, rammed through as a knee-jerk to European Muslim influxes and their jihadist excesses, prioritize shielding Semitic interests over the survival of White Europeans.”
Ironically, those “Semitic interests” are the very SOURCE of the third world immigration, hate-speech laws, and other draconian measures.
Awakening whites to their peril and organizing them is wonderful and necessary. However, this repeating cycle of history will continue until the (((nation-wreckers))) are permanently dealt with.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=wtAFtwH-lYE6
Pardon for the incomplete link, corrected https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtAFtwH-lYE
(Lousy “touch screen” here, I’ll never get used to this nonsense.)
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/theyre-getting-front-something-democrats-make-abrupt-pivot-screaming-free-palestine
https://counter-currents.com/2026/01/there-will-be-blood-new-black-light-on-strange-love/
I love ya, KMac, but before you get too excited, check out his tweet on who he thinks is (((peak white))). He has lefty views on whiteness & is thus unreliable, although hoping he does some good along the way before his next visit to the crib with casings again.
Preface, I’m Jewish and socialist, but I’m not a snake so I’m open that I’m your enemy.
He has no lefty views on Whiteness besides endorsing Jews, probably due to Israel’s support for Rhodesia and South Africa, and due to Israel clearly not being a den of globalism but supporting America turning all of it’s enemies from Communist and Socialist countries (Communist Afghanistan and Yemen, nearly Communist Oman before an intervention and Iraq before the B’aathist coup that’d one day bring Saddam into power, and two coups in Turkey causing 600k students to be tortured/arrested for being left-wing, etc) into Jihadist countries.
All of you have lefty views on Whiteness accepting Slavs and even Southern Italians as White, a whimper of defeat proving we have extended our universalizing message of brotherly love so far that even the absolute most violent haters of it are forced to believe in European Christian Brotherhood, with the Crusades serving a similar rallying cry for it being objectively ancient/based to be united, as the Revolutionary War does for White, Latin and Black Americans,
You say “Slavs, you are White,” and you humiliate yourself and the Slavic man. The Slav, who says things like one Greek Nazi did to me, “Sure, he slaughtered Greek children. Did that harm Germany?” (He also said he had the right to marry his husband and that real gays are fascist like Caesar and got mad when I told him a Black trans woman led Stonewall) essentially idolizing the man who tried to eradicate his people for being ugly which is a humiliation, but also the German-Nazi, who has to whimper in defeat and accept that he will never settle Poland and send the Poles and Russians to Latin America and Siberia, but at least he can still imagine Agartha in his head.
At least Arnold Schwarzenneger and that Black man he put his arm into in that movie had a much more spiritually strong alliance. A Black man and a Slav wouldn’t be inherintly different to a Nazi not too long ago, allying with either would be the same and maybe equally likely. So the weak and non-based alliance between those two men is at least more confidant and less whimpering in defeat, and Arnold was trained by a Jewish bodybuilder who taught him his moral ideology of making weak children grow up to be strong which was his reasoning for becoming strong to fight bullies as a child. Objectively 100% more life affirming.
Exemplified by your kind whining that your leader kissed a girl once and is a “fakecel” that can’t punish women.
Will he wear the Baphomet shoulder pads while wielding the hammer?
If Musk was truly for “our side”, then he would start donating mega-bucks to Dr. Michael Rectenwald’s newly-formed Anti-Zionist America PAC. Which, BTW, “American Free Press” promoted in their 2-page interview with him in their January 5 & 12, 2025 issue on pages 22-23. Here is the link to AZA-PAC’s site:
http://www.AZA-PAC.com
Also, James Edwards reports that former congressman Steve Stockman is running for congress again. He urges us to support Stockman’s campaign. That website is: https://draftstockman.com/donate-now I made a donation myself. Perhaps more if things gain traction.
However, I am donating monthly to AZA-PAC.
Finally, I love Prof. Kevin MacDonald too. But “Karl” of “Semitic Controversies” has reported Musk’s Jewish ancestry. I understand why so many of our people still support such people as Musk and Trump. I myself left the “Trump train” a long time ago.
Nonetheless I continue to donate to “K-Mac” on a monthly basis.
Thank you.
Umm, have you guys ever heard of controlled opposition?
Seriously, his entire business structure depends on government subsidies and involvement with In-Q-Tel—it doesn’t sound like he’s really a pro-white guy to me
By the way, the TRS guys finally admit that they are Zionists—silly—when they defend pro-Somali immigrant activist Renee Nicole Good.
Apparently, for some people, the fact that she’s white is enough to justify defending her, even though she started a fight with a federal ICE agent.
She had three children with different ex‑husbands, and the fact that her only son—who was taken into custody and sent to a reprogramming center that apparently hates white people—isn’t important to these guys…
It’s so tiresome
I’ve seen Nazis claim, “I would never kill someone of my race over politics. This must be controlled Zionist opposition,” and I laugh because obviously Nazis have always done this and it’s supported in the Turner Diaries to kill many, many Whites in a second Kristalnacht.
They’re in for a very rude awakening when Nazis, no not Israeli-op Nazis but anti-Israel Nazis (which will be their only good policy maybe besides being bitches and justifying Israel’s evil morally and therefore maybe even liked by Israel which has nukes and won’t fear them significantly) start slaughtering White liberal women.
It’s always strange to see the clash between the old far-right and the new far-right. To see anyone making an article emphatically in favor of Elon Musk or Donald Trump while also being a neo-Nazi, feels like looking at old articles of Nick Fuentes sitting down with Donald Trump, or “Hail Trump, Hail Our People, Hail Victory,” after the 2016 election.
Like you sided with Pat Buchanan, and therefore his friend Murray Rothbard, a Jewish Libertarian who defended him from allegations of antisemetism.
Because obviously, Trump has not brought about getting rid of all non-Whites, which he never promised and which most Republicans who voted for him didn’t ask for, but somehow that’s a “betrayal” just because he chose to sit down with Nazis since he doesn’t care much about Israel after they’re not a useful ally anymore.
It is still a paradox to be anywhere on the far-right and Musk is in with the pedophile elites or “fake” alt-right members given that no matter how far you are, you’re not outside of the “fake” alt-right, since obviously he is still actively stoking it today. I don’t know about Trump, but Musk at least gave Fuentes and Stonetoss, and a man connected to the Christchurch killer who killed Muslim children, their accounts back. Sure, he’s “pro-Jew” but I can see him turning against us if he decides it benefits him, although maybe he really is just the kind to hate American Jews, but like Israeli Jews, as some Israeli Jews like Lehi like Hitler just as much as they wouldn’t hate the Pharoah as both gave them nationhood.
To be a follower of Fuentes is to accept that the pedophile elites believe that somehow he is useful, whether Israel supports him because they think neo-Nazism is beneficial for ending Jews diaspora status, or whether Israel doesn’t have any control over him, but non-Jewish elites do, which would put into question whether “ZOG” exists if Nazis can infiltrate the White House, and would prove pedophilic elites can attempt to murder Jews, which would put into question whether it’s exclusively an issue of Jewish elites causing things like Epstein’s Island
Which it’s clearly not, as the Romans and Greeks were known for worshipping the boy their Emperor raped, while Nero, who Hitler admired and named his attempt to exterminate German industry in revenge after, castrated one to be his wife. The only influence Jews have had on elite pedophilia is creating a moral universalist framework that forced them to be less proud of this behavior. Tiberius had an island himself for his “little fishies” to nibble his genitals. When it comes to pedophilia it is glaringly obvious it’s not a Jewish issue, and you have to debate Jews purely on political beliefs and benefit, not on ad-hominem racial inferiority.
Roman society also allowed mixed-race marriages, and to it’s logical extent meant one government ruling England and Iraq, so if it survived to the present day you’d have the same “issues” you claim exist. The Jewish prophecy of the Roman pedophile-empire being destroyed came true, the only “worst” thing (I don’t claim it’s bad at all) Jews have done is fight to bring back the civic nationalist ideas of Rome, and also clearly improve on it such as removing from the Western man’s image of masculinity the concept that raping little boys is akin to wise mentorship and fatherhood, and yes fight for the ability of people to follow their own leader Moses and be allowed to marry an Ethiopian (as he did), or a Czech or a Spaniard as the Germans banned it, with the primary motivation beginning with preventing Armenians from being massacred for their race, and all races massacred in order to protect purity including White children such as the 33 Norwegian children killed by one neo-Nazi who cheekily asked for a medal for slaughtering them at a summer camp.
Which you can claim is anti-white. Personally, I am more concerned with protecting living, breathing little blonde girls, or Muslim girls, or whatever, from Nazis plainly killing them, than I am concerned with protecting a phenotype, meaning if I don’t use force against White men and women marrying people of other phenotypes, I am committing a “cultural genocide.” The proponents of the second in one case telling me, “White children killed by Nazis in school shootings are some fat and necessary sacrifices for racial purity.” Or, “White children are necessary sacrifices to stop White genocide.” An absurd statement. If everyone looks like an Egyptian in 1000 years and no more White children are killed by Nazis, I don’t prefer that but I prefer it.
Personally, I’d fix the problem by somehow engineering humanity, on an individual voluntary basis, to make it so that half of all mixed-race children follow the ethnicity of the mother. This way, no more than half of all humans could ever be mixed race. This would I believe satisfy absolutely everyone, except for those who simply don’t want any non-Whites in Europe even if they know they pose no threat to White phenotypes.
I’m also so, so regretful we didn’t adopt direct democracy a long time ago. Where would we be? Nobody could blame Jews for supporting immigration, if most Whites had, in 10 elections over the past 40 years, continuously confirmed they wanted immigrants, even though that probably was still the majority consensus anyway, with illegal immigration being the only non-universally accepted type and that already being handled in an authoritarian way by Trump in a way most Americans oppose, proving Jews have never pushed any policy most Americans didn’t naturally agree with.