Just don’t hurt their feelings: Australia’s Frightening New “Hate Speech” Laws Are Clearly Aimed At Pro-Palestine Groups
Australia’s Labor government has successfully passed a “hate speech” bill that’s plainly aimed, at least in part, at suppressing pro-Palestine organizations as “hate groups”.
Free speech advocates are sounding the alarm about the new laws, saying their extremely vague wording, lack of procedural fairness and low thresholds for implementation mean groups can now be banned if they make people feel unsafe or upset without ever actually posing any physical harm to anyone.
For me the most illuminating insight into what these laws are actually designed to do came up in an ABC interview with Attorney-General Michelle Rowland on Tuesday. Over and over again throughout the interview Rowland was asked by ABC’s David Speers to clarify whether the new laws could see activist groups banned for criticizing Israel and opposing its genocidal atrocities in a way that causes Jewish Australians to feel upset feelings, and she refused to rule out the possibility every single time.
“Let’s just go to what it means in practice: would a group be banned if it accuses Israel of genocide or apartheid, and as a result, Jewish Australians do feel intimidated?” Speers asked.
Rowland didn’t say no, instead saying “there are a number of other factors that would need to be satisfied there” and saying that agencies like the AFP and ASIO would need to make assessments of the situation.
“Okay, just coming back to the practical example though, if a group is suggesting that Israel is guilty of genocide, what other measures or factors would need to be met before they can be banned?” Speers asked.
“Under the provisions that are now before the parliament, there would also need to be able to demonstrate that there are for example, some aspects of state laws that deal with racial vilification that have been met as well,” Rowland responded, again leaving the possibility wide open.
(It should here be noted that Greens justice spokesperson David Shoebridge has pointed out that “state laws that deal with racial vilification” can include “tests like ‘ridicule’ and ‘contempt’,” meaning people could wind up spending years in prison for associating with groups that were essentially banned for upsetting someone’s feelings.)
“Just to be clear, if a group is saying Israel is engaged in genocide, or they’re saying that Israel should no longer exist, that is not enough for that group to be banned?” asked Speers.
“Well, again, that would depend on the other evidence that is gathered, David, so I would be reluctant to be naming and ruling in and ruling out specific kinds of conduct that you are describing here,” Rowland replied.
All this waffling can safely interpreted as a yes. Rowland is saying yes. Speers pushed this question three different times from three different angles because it’s the most immediate and obvious concern about these new laws, and instead of reassuring the public that they can’t be used to target pro-Palestine groups and aren’t intended for that purpose, the nation’s Attorney General confirmed that it was indeed possible.
So that’s it then. Under the new laws we can expect to see the Israel lobby crying about Jewish Australians feeling threatened and unsafe by every pro-Palestine group under the sun, and then from there all it takes is the thumbs-up from ASIO to put the group on the banned list and cage anyone who continues associating with it for up to 15 years.
The bill that ended up making it through Parliament is actually a narrowed down version of an even scarier bill that was scrapped by Labor due to lack of support which went after individuals as well as groups. The earlier version contained “racial vilification” components which could have been used to target any individual who voices criticisms of Israel or Zionism — so it doesn’t look like I’ll be doing any prison time for my writing any time soon. The new version moved its crosshairs to groups with the obvious intent to disrupt pro-Palestine organizing in Australia.
And we’re already seeing the Israel lobby pushing to resurrect the laws targeting individuals. A new ABC article titled “Jewish leaders call for vilification offence to be revisited as Coalition splits over watered-down hate laws” cites Zionist Federation of Australia president Jeremy Leibler and Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim arguing that the new laws don’t go far enough.
So we can expect the Australian Israel lobby to both (A) push to get pro-Palestine groups classified as “hate groups” under the new laws and (B) keep pushing to make it illegal for individuals to criticize Israel in the form of new “racial vilification” laws. They’ll keep trying over and over again, from government to government to government, until they get their way.
This comes after Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council Executive Manager Joel Burnie publicly stated that he wants to ban pro-Palestine protests and criticism of Israel throughout the nation, and as prosecutors drag an Australian woman to court for an antisemitic hate crime because she accidentally butt-dialed a Jewish nutritionist and left a blank voicemail.
So things are already ugly, and they’re getting worse.
It’s so creepy knowing I share a country with people who want to destroy my right to normal political speech. It would never occur to me to try to kill Zionists’ right to free speech, but they very openly want to kill mine. They want to permanently silence me and anyone like me. I find that profoundly disturbing.
Israel supporters are horrible people. And I hope my saying that hurts their feelings.
Free speech for all.
Violence for none.
How about that?
Well, Mr. Andrew “Gentile” thus implicitly and unintentionally states that the Nuremberg Kangaroo “Court” was a Jewish-planned event.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zjhMCFNl_YU
However, there were not only 10 individuals hanged in Nuremberg, nor was there only this one trial. In total, several hundred (alleged) “war criminals” were executed (not a single one of whom was an “Allied” one, of course, because this “International Military Tribunal” was nothing but arbitrary and victor’s “justice”).
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/hello-LtcR4MyERymZ1Ibkri4WmA
Streicher in his somewhat provincial-sounding Franconian dialect (either he was not proficient in the “refined” High German idiom, even though he himself was a teacher, or, unlike the Austrian Hitler, he rejected it out of narrow-minded “local patriotism”). The channel also offers additional historical audio material.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yrHePlL8lZg
If it were up to Jews who are still considered heroes in Israel today, not only would all the inhabitants of Nuremberg have perished en masse in their ruins (due to the “strategic bombing” planned by Jews such as Solly Zuckerman) in a veritable biblical-style poisoning of the wells, a total of “6 million,” even though at that time it had not yet been proven what the total number of victims of the “Holocaust” would be, which would be set in stone and become virtually immutable.
Some even claim that the historical allegations and accusations are a quasi-externalized, purely Talmudic projection directed at their hostile counterpart (see Amalek or Edom), for how can one intend, in good conscience, to kill 6 million innocent Germans, mostly children, women, and the elderly?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JRv0HBRA1lc
“Just as the cat cannot stop mousing, the Jew cannot stop lying and swindling, says Moustache Man in a speech from 1938, incomprehensible to Anglos, so there is no point in publishing it, as “UK Steve” regularly does.
https://ftjmedia.com/video/.nUNagAhVSIphuj9OYcM_Ag
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/die_Katze_l%C3%A4sst_das_Mausen_nicht
Not unfunny “philosophy session” over a year ago. Dutch-Canadian outlaw Gertjan Zwiggelaar claimed that corrupt Khazar penis pianist Zelensky also ownes an expensive estate in Patagonia, acquired with swindled Western tax money.
https://odysee.com/@uksteve:1/uksteve-tabletalk-w_gertyan:e
Jews gotta jew.
Translation: lie subvert destroy.
Yesterday, I didn’t get very far with my analysis of the grotesque show trial against Streicher, but it quickly becomes clear that an example was to be made of him.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Glel-0P–xw
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Exo0ZVrgBXM
Apart from the inhumane treatment he received during his imprisonment (Negroes spat in his mouth, he had to drink his own urine, his testicles were maltreated, etc.).
Picked up/arrested by Jewish “war hero” Henry G. Plitt, “examined” by Jewish court psychiatrist Leon Goldensohn, interrogated by Jewish later “cabaret artist” Georg Kreisler. Bolshevikipedia: “He complained throughout the process that all his judges were Jews.”
We will also never know whether his party comrade Robert Ley actually “strangled himself in his prison cell,” as parroted in this AI video (just like with Epstein).
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=B3R52y2NgC0
In view of the situation threatening our very existence, we simply need to apply the principle of the flak towers to white society (see also “Orania”).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flak_tower
The aim is to create self-sufficient, autonomous, resilient, defensive and viable units that function like white blood cells.
I found some good articles on this subject in the training letters of the NSDAP, published by Ley’s office, which apparently have not been translated (except for excerpts) to this day.
https://archive.org/search?query=creator%3A%22Reichsorganisationsleiter+der+NSDAP%22
https://archive.org/details/general-behaviour-of-the-national-socialist/mode/1up
https://archive.org/details/twelve-leadership-principles/mode/1up
AI tells: The (following) video is a documentary about the World War II flak towers in Berlin, Hamburg, and Vienna, focusing on their engineering, architecture, and later reuse.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tVv4hZvFcrc
Main content
• The film introduces the flak towers as gigantic reinforced-concrete structures with walls up to about 3.5 m thick, designed as “buildings for eternity” that resisted demolition attempts even after the war.
• It explains that each flak tower complex consisted of two coordinated towers: the large G‑tower (combat tower) with the heavy anti‑aircraft guns on the roof, and the slimmer L‑tower (fire-control/lead tower) with radar such as the “Wurzburg Giant” to detect bombers and transmit targeting data.
• Construction was an enormous logistical operation: rail traffic across the country was adjusted to supply enough cement and steel, work ran 24/7 with continuous concrete pouring, and towers were erected within roughly six months in dense urban centers.
• The documentary distinguishes three construction “generations”:
• Type 1 in Berlin: huge square blocks about 75 m per side and nearly 40 m tall, with four massive corner towers carrying 12.8 cm twin anti-aircraft guns, giving 360° fire coverage.
• Type 2, especially in Hamburg and Vienna’s Arenberg park: smaller footprint (around 57 m side length), more compact arrangement of guns for faster ammunition supply and command, and better-protected radar on the L‑tower.
• Type 3 in Vienna: nearly cylindrical 16‑sided towers about 43 m in diameter and 55 m high, with rounded forms to deflect blast waves, very thick reinforced walls, and a distinctive concrete “ring” or collar that shielded lower levels and carried lighter flak weapons.
Interior use and life inside
• The towers functioned as self-contained vertical cities: they had their own deep wells, diesel generators, air-filtration and overpressure systems to keep out gas and smoke, storage for supplies, and integrated hospitals with operating theaters and dozens of beds.
• Officially, each combat tower was meant to shelter about 15,000 civilians, but in major raids up to roughly 30,000 people crowded inside, filling stairways and corridors.
• While the heavy guns on the roof fired, the entire structure shook; people inside mainly felt the recoil and rumble of their own guns rather than the impact of enemy bombs outside.
• The towers also stored major cultural treasures in climate‑controlled vaults, including famous museum objects that survived the war behind the thick concrete walls.
End of the war and after
• After 1945, the victorious powers wanted these symbols of Nazi military power removed and attempted to blow them up with large amounts of explosives; in Berlin, the Zoo tower required multiple massive demolition attempts before it finally collapsed.
• In Hamburg and Vienna, experts concluded that enough explosives to destroy the towers would also devastate the surrounding inner-city districts, so several towers were left standing.
• Some surviving towers were later repurposed: one in Hamburg became an “energy bunker” supplying green heat, and the tower in Vienna’s Esterházypark was converted into the “Housr of the des Sea” aquarium, where fish now swim where ammunition once lay.
Overall conclusions
• The documentary concludes that the flak towers were extreme examples of wartime engineering: structurally overbuilt, logistically impressive, and technologically advanced for their time, especially as integrated weapons and shelter systems.
• It stresses the irony that structures built for “total war” later became peaceful facilities (energy infrastructure, aquariums) and cultural storehouses, showing how architecture can be reinterpreted over time.
• Finally, it presents the remaining towers as architectural “scars” and silent memorials, reminding observers both of human capacity for destruction and for protection, resilience, and reuse, and of a period that must not be forgotten.
https://yewtu.be/watch?v=eGM5yDeG2wQ
Hundreds of children were born in the flak towers, and at least a few priceless cultural treasures were saved from irretrievable destruction. In Gaza, there are no flak towers against the terror of the Jews, even 80 years after the World War.
And the double standards can be seen in the fact that the mass murderers around Satanyahu not only have no punishment to fear, but are reverently received by the cowardly “heads of government” of the goy nations.
While a publicist of “pornographic anti-Semitic” caricatures such as Streicher, who, according to his own statement in court, never called for violence against Jews and did not even demand their expulsion and the destruction of their “synagogues of Satan” like Martin Luther, the founder of Protestantism, in his book “The Jews and Their Lies,” but this was not taken into consideration as an argument before the Nuremberg kangaroo court.
Streicher argued in court that he had always quoted original Jewish sources such as the Talmud or the Old Testament in his articles or those of his employees, as well as contemporary statements by Jews themselves.
As with his co-defendants, Streicher’s rope was deliberately manipulated by the British executioner so that his agony lasted a quarter of an hour, not through a broken neck but through slow suffocation, clearly an act of sadistic revenge.
Incidentally, William Joyce was also arrested by a Jew, who is sitting behind him in the famous photo (with Joyce lying under a blanket), smiling and looking down at him with a submachine gun.
He, too, was arbitrarily sentenced to death for “high treason,” even though he was not even a British citizen but an American and/or Irish one.