So When CAN We Slander Victims Of The Police? – Part 1
Better hope liberals like you before getting killed by the government
When is it okay to “slander” the victim of a police shooting? It all depends on the politics of the victim.
Ever since Renee Good and Alex Pretti got themselves killed by interfering with federal law enforcement while in possession of deadly weapons, the media have been in a fit about the Trump administration’s plan to investigate the agitators’ ties to anti-ICE activist groups.
The federal government is facing a militarized, highly disciplined, violent left-wing operation that will do anything to prevent a single illegal alien from being deported. This includes road-blocking, screaming, blowing whistles, face-to-face confrontations, arson, vandalism, even assassination.
But for wanting to gather information on these two troublemakers, The Hill newspaper thundered at the administration: “the expectation is straightforward: you investigate the use of deadly force,” NOT the victims of the deadly force.
Hennepin County Prosecutor Mary Moriarty says the Trump administration’s interest in finding out more about Good and Pretti is “galling.” (Moriarty is such a left-wing lunatic that the other lunatics, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison, had to take a murder case away from her, after she offered the perps a two-year sentence in a juvenile facility. This earned her a 6X daily spot on MS-NOW.)
Obama administration veteran Juliette N. Kayyem claims that “Kill and Slander” is official government policy. “Kill and Slander,” she said, is the “terminology that is part of their M.O. right now.”
What liberals mean by “slander” is “to reveal unflattering facts about a person.”
Divulging anything vaguely negative about a victim whom liberals like is abhorrent, beyond the bounds of decency — even if the information is true, relevant and important. On the other hand, if liberals don’t like you, the worst thing you ever did in your life will be front-page news the day after the government kills you. The nastier and more irrelevant, the better.
DON’T LIKE: law enforcement officers, gun enthusiasts, and right-wing protesters.
LIKE: criminals and left-wing protesters.
This is part one, about the “Okay To Slander” chumps. There aren’t a lot of these to choose from because the people liberals don’t like rarely fight with the police.
On Jan. 6, Ashli Babbitt was blown away by Capitol Hill Police Lt. Michael Byrd for trespassing. She was not attempting to run over a law enforcement officer, nor was she getting in the face of an officer while carrying a gun.
Immediately after her death, the media were fairly bristling with Babbitt’s flaky beliefs, tweets, arrests (no convictions) — even a confrontation with her husband’s ex-girlfriend, despite its sublime irrelevance to whether Byrd was justified in shooting her. The day after her death, The New York Times ran this headline: “Woman Killed in Capitol Embraced Trump and QAnon; After 14 years in the military, Ashli Babbitt bought a pool supply company and delved into far-right politics.”
Meanwhile, we still don’t know anything about Ms. Good’s first husband or why she didn’t have custody of their two children, among other basic biographical information. It took 10 days for the media to tell us that Ms. Good wasn’t even married to the woman the media still call her “wife.”
No one said it was “tragic” that Babbitt was killed. They went straight to calling her a kook, this 14-year Air Force veteran. We certainly weren’t treated to a week of interviews with people who loved her. No photo-shopping to make her more attractive.
In other words, Babbitt’s death got the exact opposite treatment of Good and Petti’s, who were directly harassing federal officers trying to enforce federal law. Those two must be beatified — or you’re a Nazi.
Say, anybody remember Waco?
While not as recent as the murder of Emmett Till — no, I’m sorry, it’s 40 years more recent — in 1993, Bill Clinton’s ATF and FBI killed 80 Americans, including 22 children at a Waco, Texas, compound of Branch Davidians, an offshoot of Seventh-day Adventists.
They did this for the sole purpose of serving a warrant on a single individual, David Koresh, who’d always peacefully complied with warrants in the past. But instead of just knocking on the door, the ATF decided to shoot, strafe and tear-gas a compound full of men women and children.
It was the U.S. government’s largest massacre of Americans in history.
Naturally, Democrats and the media leapt to defend the government’s pointless slaughter of Americans.
Guess how!
They smeared Koresh. The Democrats produced a member of Koresh’s religious sect, a 14-year-old girl, who testified that she’d been sexually abused by him.
And oh, how the media cheered. Under the headline, “In Waco Hearings, Parties Undergo a Role Reversal,” the Times cackled about how Democrats had switched the focus to Koresh — rather than the federal agents who killed him. Then-Rep. Charles E. Schumer, the Times reported, “received a congratulatory telephone call from President Clinton.” (Taking a moment away from jetting off on the Lolita Express with Jeffrey Epstein, no doubt.)
The Washington Post explained that “Koresh’s character — and the nature of his hold over his band of followers — is crucial to understanding what happened.”
Crucial! (His “hold” was based primarily on his mastery of the Bible, suggesting another category of Americans liberals think it’s okay to kill.)
In contrast to what’s happening in Minneapolis, the Branch Davidians were not an ongoing threat to the operation of the federal government, if they ever were. Their leader was dead and the compound a heap of smoldering ashes. To borrow from Hillary Clinton, what difference, at that point, did it make what kind of man Koresh was?
Maybe the molestation claim was true and maybe it wasn’t. The moral of the story is, sliming Koresh was the left’s go-to move. You might call it “Kill and Slander.”
COPYRIGHT 2025 ANN COULTER
The Minneapolis events bring to (my) mind the matter of White pathological altruism. And, then then there is the intimately related factor, Jewish subversion and manipulation of said White pathological altruism.
Our White Evolution/Genetics based psychology of altruism, compassion, empathy is far greater than other racial groups. This is addressed by Kevin Macdonald’s work (Culture of Critique).
So the matter at hand is whether genetic altruism is more important or less important than the ideology of equality/democracy and Jewish subversion. It is safe to posit that Democracy is a Western Idea, a White idea, stretching back to classical Greece and Rome. No other race or culture has invented/developed such an idea. It is also safe to claim that
biology/genetics has some large role in this cultural and political idea.
Then there is Christianity, obviously connected to the biology of Whites. Christianity in the modern era, invented anti-slavery in the early 19th century in England. No other religion has invented anti-slavery.
Furthermore, it is also reasonable to posit an emotional sense of what we call “fairness” as a White mental trait.
That is very important inasmuch as disinterested love (not romantic love) has underpinned notions of fairness, justice, and social awareness of a mutuality in human relations, particularly in “democratic” societies wherein there is a large need for a sense of corporateness, that is, one body of citizens, and even noncitizens if they obtain. This is called the “body politic.”
We are now beginning to realize the limitations of Liberal ideas of integration, equality, diversity and inclusion in a world of large differences in race, culture, and social practices in which hundreds of thousands of years have developed different peoples/races in very different environments thereby selecting for human types suitable for particular environments that have very different conditions from one another. Yes, it is an environmentalist argument but one that procedes over hundreds of thousands of years, not an election cycle, etc.
The most obvious differences are climate….cold or warm/hot. Cold selects for high IQ and Wam-hot selects for darkies who won’t work beyond the bare minimum
So, the conclusion to all of the above is first, that LIberalism which posits that very different races, etc. can get along together is wrong. We all do not all get along, even within particular races. Second, the differences, particularly in intelligence, are so great that one race, or several races, will outcompete others.
This gets me to my main point. The problem of White pathological altruism is both genetic and political/cultural.
Northern European Whites are the most pathologically altruistic ( myself included…coming from English and Swedish blood….and having been a ‘democratic socialist’ in my youth and well into my adult years.)
Minnesota has a very large contingent of Nordic types…. the types that will kill Whites for darker races that do not give a fig for Whites or anybody else. I notice that my local newspapers are reporting large cuts for “social spending” in towns in San Mateo County, just south of San Francisco, due to federal cuts to welfare.
These cuts in welfare/schooling for illegals and legal Hispanics, are leading to race conflict. Niggers are part of this but have benefitted from the paternalism of Whites for decades but will soon feel the cuts to welfare and set-asides .
Does it make a difference on whether we prioritize White altruistic pathology or Jewish subversion of Whites in general…movies (right now my local TV is running many Jew Prop movies, from Exodus to Ann Frank, etc)?
Probably the best course right now is to focus on Gaza and Jewish perfidy and Trump’s right-now build up of military around Iran. But we need to understand how especially Nordics in Minnesota are so vulnerable to jew propaganda and White hating jewish Hollywood hatred of all Whites.
.
Why not: socialist “ideas of integration, equality, diversity and inclusion in a world of large differences in race, culture, and social practices…”?
Why not: “that” Socialism “which posits that very different races, etc. can get along together is wrong.”?
Because there is no explanatory power in the socialist position. As I recall North Vietnam and China did a war about 1979. etc. The disgrace of two Socialist countries going to war with one another…
National interests and race are the fundamentals in war. Also large intelligence differences among the races is insoluble with regard to race. Indians in the US were a stone-age race…think Indian arrowheads…stone.
No inferior race can stand up to a largely superior race. China, etc. have 5 points on Whites, not that that it is a large difference, but…
Then there are large temperamental differences, especially Individualism vs. Collectivism. Whites are the only race that is Individualistic.
However, now that technology has been ‘equalized’ between the intelligent races, the collectivist races will probably beat White individualists. Of course on condition that there are not very large deficits in races like niggers, etc. African IQ is about 70, not even sufficient to invent the wheel, etc.
Whites have an Achilles heel, namely our genetic and cultural (Jew Subversion…Franz Boas) traits of luv everybody. Christianity is part of that ‘cultural’ matrix.
Also, IQ inequality largely contradicts the communist, etc. class analysis; it is not class struggle, except insofar as capitalism, could historically ameliorate the effects of a meritocracy…but nowadays class conflict is returning as the Billionaires and Trumpstein’s jew bankers are reducing working and middle class income.
So, today it is both race and class struggle that figure in our present ‘dialectics’ of race conflict. Wait until our gentle Hispanics get desperate as welfare is being cut right now.
They, and the niggers, will riot along with our White pathological altruists per Minnesota and there will be tragic consequences of , again, White brothers killing one another over niggers and spics. The Depression coming….will amplify all of this greatly.
Lenin explained everything there is to explain about real life. There is only one question: “Who — whom?” Meaning: “who is doing what to whom?” If somebody is killing my enemies, give him a medal. If somebody is killing my people, let’s hunt him down. Now, technically speaking, an individual doesn’t have to consider any group of people to be ‘his’ people. But, normal, sane humans all do so — this is called Human Nature, which is innate, inherited, and immutable. Likely due to some unknown 18th or 19th Century genetic mutation, Europeans (AKA White people), are the only known group of humans to deny, in any numbers, that their own race/ethnicities exist, or at least that they matter. This is evolutionary suicide, of which there aren’t any comparable examples that I know of. It is suicidal because, no matter what Europeans think about the question, every other group of humans on the planet do instinctively recognize both their in-group and all other out-groups, and behave accordingly. This is just another version of the old song of the deracinated, claiming that “it takes two to fight”. Well, maybe, but the fact is that if one person (or group) refuses to defend against an attack by another person/group, perhaps a “fight” isn’t the result, but a severe beating or “killing” will be the result. In other words, you can fight or you can surrender, but you can’t stop an attack by an alien or alien group. Normal, sane people do not consider this choice to present an acceptable alternative. This is called by biologists the instinct for self-preservation, and it is considered to be a good thing.
A hopeful development right now is that Trumpstein is probably going to be driven from office….per the news about snakes like Lindsay Graham and others in the GOP getting ready to dump Trump. Dumping Trump is necessary for the GOP to recover if not for this year, but for ’28.
Give Vance a chance…he was a never Trumper a few years ago and seems a good prospect to beat any of the Dem party Armies of the Night contenders. Who else?
Of course, the onrushing Depression will probably crush the GOP anyway because it will be blamed for the depression. Nevertheless…I know a white female about 22 who loves Gaza and also says she likes Vance.
The revolt of the Dems and White nigger lovers will be hard to beat right now, but the general election is 3 years away. Let the rapid rejection of the Jew Tool, Trumpstein, help GOP in ’28. Even a GOP softening on ICE is probably a useful strategic retreat. A lot of GOP younger folks are distancing from The Jews. The Depression promises to be bad, and that is going to shake things up, including beaner and nigger protests against Whitey. Welfare payoffs to the darkies is already beginning to happen starting with Federal cuts to states.
Let the armies of the night start killing Whites…that ought to sharpen the wits of us wimpy Whites.
The news brings us more info on Trump Vanishment Syndrome. The House is getting together impeachment numbers. There are several other ways besides impeachment that Trumpstein can he brought to heel.
I just watched George Will run down the possibilities of terminating Trump. I don’t have the patience to go thru it all, but search George Will’s post of yesterday for a clear analysis of constitutional law on all of this.
Impeachment and other lawful ways of removing Trumpstein are testament to the Founding Fathers’ (White) wisdom.
Trump is deranged now, even if he wasn’t so right from the git go
The politics of all of this will keep us entertained for some time yet the sooner the better for Whites, will hasten the reform of the GOP maybe in time for ’28.
The next consideration is , will Trumpstein, Jew Tool that he is, go to war with Iran to whip up war fever to save himself? Dunno, it does not seem like there is much if any appetite for war, except from the Jews…old neocons, new neocons like Graham, and Rubio, and Congressional GOP Jew Tools, well paid of course and the MIC.
Iran states that this time it will be immediate full retaliation against Israel and US bases in the Middle East. Turkey is prepared to act…but it is not clear what Erdogan will do.
Macgregor and Ritter see near certainty of war.
This mix of factors seems to be a perfect storm for the Jews and us. I hope the Jewish state disappears.