The Peter Mandelson Scandal and Those Perennial “Schizophrenic” Conspiracy Theories
Ever since I started researching “controversial” topics, I have found myself irritated — whether at a certain conferences or on Twitter — by the same thing happening over and over again. No matter how logical my argument nor how much data I present in order to make sense of, for example, the reasons for the decline in IQ among natives of Western countries there is always somebody who will interject, “The Jew! The Jew! It’s all because of the Jew! Why do you never mention the Jew!”
I have mentioned Ashkenazi Jews and, indeed, I caused some controversy by cautiously defending some aspects of Kevin MacDonald’s Culture of Critique in the journal Evolutionary Psychology in 2018. I noted that Jewish people are higher than Europeans in ethnocentrism, for example. However, for some people this is not enough. They insist that there is a Jewish conspiracy — at the hands of elite Jews — to destroy Western civilization and that this explains pretty much everything nefarious in the Western world: mass Third World immigration, sexual degeneracy and so on.
This idea is frequently mocked as being the worldview of right-wing schizophrenics. Sometimes, there is added to it the notion that the elite are not only Jewish-influenced but are sexual degenerates, as in Eyes Wide Shut. Unfortunately, recent revelations from the latest batch of Epstein Files give this right-wing schizophrenic a great deal more to contemplate, and worry about, than he previously had. What has come to light in the UK is almost unbelievable.
The key reason why the UK is a lawless tyranny is the proto-Woke revolution that was initiated by New Labour between 1997 and 2010. During this period, they deliberately flooded the country with non-white immigrants in order to “rub the right’s nose in diversity,” as one of their advisers put it. They reformed all public institutions — the universities, the civil service, the judiciary, the police and much more — making it the law that they must promote diversity, effectively politicising them; creating a permanent Woke Deep State. They introduced many anti-free speech laws and ramped up prosecutions under existing laws. Introducing positive discrimination in this deep state, White people became second class citizens in their own country, cementing left-wing influence further. The powers of parliament were farmed out to Quangos that were constitutionally pro-diversity. In effect, there had been a Gramscian march through the institutions; a cultural revolution.
The “architect” of “New Labour” — of a party obsessed with image pretending it wasn’t left-wing despite senior cabinet ministers being ex-Communists — was a Jewish spin doctor and later a cabinet minister called Peter Mandelson, himself a member of the Communist Party in the 1970s, according to MI5. Mandelson’s self-professed best friend was Jeffrey Epstein and Mandelson continued to be very friendly with Jeffrey Epstein even after Epstein was convicted of a paedophilia offence in 2008. Mandelson was twice fired from Tony Blair’s government for corruption, but by 2009 he was back in the cabinet as Business Secretary. In the financial chaos of 2009 — the so-called Economic Crisis — Mandelson forwarded emails to Epstein, sometimes almost immediately after receiving them, which revealed to Epstein state secrets via which he could enrich himself with inside information regarding the UK’s economic plans.
Epstein was clearly an ethnocentric Jew who dismissed White people as low intelligence “goyim” (an offensive term for all gentiles) and he was the central node in a social network of the super-elite — Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Bill Gates, Prince Andrew and so on — and would hold debauched parties, seemingly involving young prostitutes with some of them being under-age, via which elite people could network with other elite people, rendering him extremely influential. Mandelson was clearly part of this network because the Epstein files included a photo of Mandelson in a shirt and underpants talking to a young woman, whose face is the usual black square. There is evidence that Epstein was acting as a spy for Israel given his very close connections to Ehud Barak, former Prime Minister and Director of Military Intelligence for Israel. It has also been suggested that he was a Russian spy, and the Polish Prime Minister — who presumably has good sources — has asserted that this is probably so. It would follow that whatever state secrets Mandelson leaked to Epstein would’ve ended up in the hands of the Kremlin. Mandelson also offered to help Epstein secure a Russian VISA.
Last year, MI5 made their concerns about Mandelson perfectly clear to the Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, but Starmer, whose wife and children are Jewish, nevertheless, ignored these concerns and appointed Mandelson the Ambassador to the US, Britain’s most senior diplomatic post. Starmer is now trying to victim-signal that he was lied to by Mandelson like everybody else. This is absurd, in that Mandelson was already a proven liar and it makes one wonder if Mandelson, who is gay, has compromat on the “family man” Starmer. It is widely suspected that Starmer is gay and, currently, 5 Ukrainian rent boys are being investigated for arson on assorted properties and former properties of Starmer’s, addresses that are not publicly known.
As I noted earlier, what has come to light is incredible and many Members of Parliament are simply stunned by it. This is certainly the worst scandal to hit British politics since the Profumo Affair in 1963 in which the Minister of War, John Profumo, was having an affair with a young model who was herself also having an affair with the naval attaché at the Soviet Embassy. Profumo lied to parliament about it and was forced to resign in disgrace.
In effect, the very heart of New Labour — its so-called architect — turns out to have been a literal traitor to his country who saw no problem taking a great deal of money from and remaining friends with a convicted paedophile and the Prime Minister either has amazingly poor judgement or is compromised in some way that the media daren’t discuss. Worse still, for the regime, the entire affair gives our schizophrenic right-wing friend what would seem to him like sound reasons to double down on his worldview.
I have read several books by Mr. Dutton. I think he lacks insight into dark triad personalities because he does have dark triad traits himself, or at least they don’t make up a strong component of his personality. Most normal people lack these traits, which makes them into easy prey for those who have them in abundance, like most politicians and other power people like Epstein. The “normies” think others have their basically good personalities and have trouble seeing that the scum always rise to the top. Take Trump for example, most can recognize him as a narcissist, but few, even smart people, don’t recognize his dominant trait of Machiavellianism. He conceals that by emphasizing his narcissism, while he keeps his enemies close and slowly betrays them.
I think you’re wrong about Edward Dutton. He’s brilliant anthropologist, researcher and writer. I detect nothing wrong with his personality.
However, you are right about Trump. He is an extreme narcissist and a degenerate. But is he also a Machiavellian? No, I don’t think so. That would be an insult to the memory of Niccolo Machiavelli.
This article summarizes well the British dimension to the Epstein scandal. Peter Mandelson, Keir Starmer, Tony Blair & comrades are the worst traitors in British history. They join Burgess, Philby and MacLean.
However, they will suffer no consequences, because the UK judiciary is totally corrupt, and controlled by perverts, druggies and Jews – the same as in New York, California and Minnesota.
I wonder if anything will come of this huge scandal. Will there be any radical changes to UK immigration policy, for example? Now more than ever, this proves that the USA (with its satellite regimes in Europe) is an Evil Empire. Russia is the good guy, because it resists, as do China and Iran. That explains Trump’s hostility to them all. Trump is an proven Israeli agent, who tried to conceal the Epstein files, to protect all his Jewish friends.
“What would seem to him like sound reasons”? Surely, the data presented in Dr. Dutton’s essay might well strike any Brit, at least one whose mind isn’t hermetically sealed to the influence of “bad facts,” as being compelling enough—i.e., unschizophrenic enough—to suggest that Jews and Jewish influence aren’t as wholesome as his rulers insist they are.
Ever since the good old days of the 1950s Soviet Union, the leftist tactic of declaring that one’s opponents are mentally ill has held pride of place in their rhetorical arsenal. Yet despite the fact that throughout his career, Dutton has been hounded by Establishment critics who assault his character with veiled allusions and his publications with ad hominem attacks and straw-man argumentation, he here casually uses the expression “right-wing schizophrenics” without disavowing the phrase’s pose of physicianly solicitude, which masks an implication that the arguments of the right-wingers in question are simply too diseased to address with anything except medication or quarantine.
Dutton might be hailed as a genuinely iconoclastic thinker were he to be so bold as to call those with whom he disagrees mistaken rather than crazy and to challenge his interlocutors to do the same.
“They insist that there is a Jewish conspiracy — at the hands of elite Jews — to destroy Western civilization and that this explains pretty much everything nefarious in the Western world: mass Third World immigration, sexual degeneracy and so on.“
Do you live on under a rock? It seems so obvious to me that I think you need compelling arguments to argue the opposite. Begging the question is just boomerism.