Tucker Carlson: Israel’s True Motives, Potential False Flags, and Oncoming Global Crisis

From the Israeli point of view, the war with Iran is a major step to secure their dominance in the Middle East (Turkey is next). In this video Tucker argues that a motive for many Israelis is to destroy the Dome of the Rock, an Islamic shrine and the oldest example of Islamic architecture built on the ruins of the Second Temple, destroyed by the Romans in 70 A.D. He notes that many IDF soldiers wear a patch depicting the Third Temple distributed by Chabad, Rebbe Schneerson’s organization of Hasidic Jews. This opens the possibility of a false flag attack occurring in the “fog of war”—an Israeli speciality.

Dome of the Rock

Tucker also interviews Brandon Weichert who discusses the looming shortage of missiles in the U.S. arsenal and the impossibility of replacing them quickly.

Video: War Update: Israel’s True Motives, Potential False Flags, and Oncoming Global Crisis

Transcript:

Tucker [00:00:01] It’s a safe bet that almost no one involved in the war now ongoing in Iran and the Gulf would like to see it continue much longer. If you were to poll, well, the Iranians or the Americans, basically anybody, how long do you want this to go? Very few people would say, I want it to go a long time. But that doesn’t mean it won’t go a very long time, unfortunately it is likely to. It’s unlikely to be resolved any time soon. Of course, that could prove to be untrue. You never know. It’s an utterly dynamic situation. But big picture there are still a couple of unresolved questions that this war may resolve, this war may be the only thing that resolves them and so until there’s a consensus on the answers to those questions it probably is going to continue. What are those questions? Well the first is geopolitical and it’s the biggest question of all which is who runs the world who gets to make the decisions, not simply who’s richest but who makes the rules, who sets the terms. And for most of our lifetimes, there has been no question about that. The answer has been the United States. The United States sets the rules. United States runs the world. That’s been true in the western half of the world since 1945, when the U.S. Emerged stronger and richer than any other nation after the end of World War II. And it’s been through since August of 1991, 35 years ago, after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The United State has reigned in a. Unipolar world. That’s what they call it. There’s just one pole. There’s one center of gravity. There’s power center and that’s been the United States. But that has changed over the past several years, maybe decades certainly since China was admitted into the WTO in 2001. Now it is a multipolar world, you’ve heard that phrase no doubt and that means there are a couple, at least a couple centers of gravity, really there are two. There’s the US and the constellation of states with which it’s allied and then there is on the eastern hemisphere of the globe. And China is now a peer with the United States, at least, almost no matter how you measure it. Population, of course, much bigger. Military power, well, we’re not quite sure, but certainly from a technological and industrial output standpoint, at least a peer. And then on a pure economic level, well, China has a bigger economy, a bigger real economy than the United State. So yes, China is a peer, and so the question is, since you now have Countries that are roughly evenly matched. We think we never do know until they come into conflict, but they seem roughly evenly match Who gets to set the terms for? Commerce and diplomacy and everything else that happens on the globe Well, if you were to reach a diplomatic solution There would be in effect a power-sharing agreement between these two countries you take the East I take the West here are the terms But unfortunately, no such agreement formal or informal has been reached for a bunch of reasons, it’s everybody’s fault, but one of the reasons is almost nobody in Washington can get his head around the current present obvious reality, which is no, we don’t run everything anymore. We are in competition, not necessarily in conflict, but in competition with this other country that’s at least as powerful as we are called China, different system, language, culture, et cetera, but at least every bit is powerful. And so you can’t make unilateral decisions anymore. It’s sort of that moment that many parents face when used to barking orders at their kids. They realize the kid is taller than them and like it’s a new relationship in some ways. You’re always the parent, but you can just bark orders anymore. That’s pretty much where we are with China or maybe a little past that actually. And what we’ve noticed over the past several years is the total unwillingness, the inflexibility of Washington policymakers to just acknowledge the reality. And instead, even as we speak, there’s probably some symposium underway in Washington about what will we do if China invades Taiwan? Well, of course, from China’s perspective, Taiwan is part of China. It’s just sort of run off for the past 75 years, but it’s still part of, that’s their view. And the United States of course isn’t in a position to stop the reclamation of Taiwan, let’s stop lying. And yet only in DC is that not obvious. Which is to say people in Washington are still acting like they’re running everything unopposed, but they’re not. And the rest of the world is looking on and thinking at some point, you gotta knock it off and face reality. Now there are a lot of people in the United States, me included, who would like to live in a unipolar world. It’s way less fun to be constrained, to have to come to terms with another country before you make a decision. No one wants to do that. No one want to be challenged. But again, it’s sort of not up to us. Or anyone the moment that you live in. You’re not in charge of reality, actually. And so this is the reality we live in, and the question is, are we going to come to terms with it in a reasonable way, or are we gonna be forced through use of arms to face that reality? And it looks increasingly like the latter, unfortunately. That is not the way to settle matters like this because you can emerge greatly diminished from those contests and find yourself in a much weaker negotiating position. Better negotiate while you’re strong than when you’re weak, but our leaders weren’t wise or farsighted enough to do that. Seized by hubris, they were dictating terms. It was like Baghdad, Bob. It’s sad actually, no reason to laugh about it, but that. Is one of the questions now being decided in Iran. Why Iran? Well, because these questions are always decided by proxy. No two great powers want to go to war with each other, of course, especially in the nuclear age, because that could mean simultaneous elimination and no one wants that, at least consciously. And so, typically these things play out in third countries, like Vietnam, famously, or Afghanistan for both the Soviets and the United States, or Korea, and now Iran. Iran, which is part of alliance that includes the other big powers, Russia and China. So they may not be explicitly weighing in, which has to say they’re not fighting alongside the Iranians yet. But they’re certainly on Iran’s side. And they’re suddenly helping in a multitude of ways one expects. And a lot for them rides on the outcome. And because it does, makes it harder to settle this thing. So that’s the geopolitical very obvious overlay here. That’s why this is not just a debate about whether the Ayatollah has nuclear weapons. Stop. It’s much bigger than that and much more serious than that, and the consequences are much more profound than that. So that’s the first. But there is another layer that most Americans are not aware of, but much the rest of the world is highly aware of. And that is a religious layer. Now, Lindsey Graham is on tape saying to a gaggle of reporters, his bloodshot eyes, his puffy face, God knows what he’s been doing, saying explicitly, this is a religious war. This is a RELIGIOUS war. Now, his motive in saying that, you know, he’s not here to answer the question. We can only guess. Is he trying to foment a religious War? Probably. He’s an End Times kind of guy. But it almost doesn’t matter. He’s telling the truth for once. This is A RELigious War. Fundamentally. That is not obvious to most Americans because this is the most secular society, not just the United States, but the West, the English-speaking world, Europe and the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, in history. There’s never been a more godless, to be blunt about it, a more secular society at scale, never. Nothing approaching this has ever happened, ever. Every society is fundamentally a religious society, explicitly religious, except ours. So we lack the terms to describe what we’re seeing, and we lack the imagination to think about it. And well, to quote Jesus, we have the eyes, but we cannot see. We don’t see what’s happening around us, but the rest of the world very much does see. So you often hear people talk about the Middle East crisis, and they usually mean energy. You know, people want the oil, the gas. But traditionally, when people have talked about the Middle east, they’re talking about Jerusalem. We’re talking about the holiest spot on earth. Let’s be a lot more specific when we say the holies spot on Earth. The holiest part on Earth is something called the foundation stone. The foundation stone is literally a rock in Jerusalem on what used to be called Mount Moriah, which was at one point the highest place in the oldest part of Jerusalem. And it’s on that spot, on that rock, on the stone that Jews believe the world began. The Old Testament or the Jewish Torah tells us that Abraham brought Isaac bound to be sacrificed to God. It’s on that spot that Muslims believe that the Prophet Muhammad ascended into heaven. And of course it’s right nearby that Christians believe Jesus was crucified and then rose to heaven. So on that spot or right nearby, a lot has happened. But critically on that place, because it was the place where Abraham brought Isaac, and again, to American ears this sounds weird, but to the rest of the world it’s like, yeah, everyone knows this because it’s the center of their lives. On that spot Solomon built his famous temple. Now, in the Torah, it says pretty clearly, and correct me if I’m misreading it, Jews, followers of God, can only publicly worship God and sacrifice on that spot. In that city, Jerusalem, on that spots. And on that was built a temple, the first temple. Now, that was destroyed by Babylonians, famously. And then it was rebuilt and later improved by Herod. And it was, at its completion, I think, the largest building, certainly the largest religious building in the ancient world. It was in that building that Jesus preached in what we call the second temple that Jesus preached, the very center of Judaism, building without which you can’t really have Torah Judaism. The religion just didn’t work without it by its own terms. In its own book, it said that. And during one of his sermons in that sermon, Jesus, who Christians believe is God sent to says this will be torn down. Not one stone will be left standing. And it was shortly after that that he was put on trial in the middle of the night and tortured to death. As it happens, so that’s the religion. Here’s the history. About 35 years later, 37 years later in that range, in 70 AD, Titus, the emperor of the Roman Empire, got into quite a conflict with the Jews of Judea. Complex and incredibly brutal, but the bottom line was, in AD 70, the Romans besieged Jerusalem, finally broke through the walls and tore that temple stone from stone, not a single stone left upon another. Really a kind of dedication to destruction that’s hard for the modern mind to imagine. We talk about genocide, this genocide, that the Romans tried to genocide the for real. And they succeeded in destroying the temple. And with it, temple Judaism, Torah Judaism can’t have the religion that existed before AD 70, after AD 70 because there’s no temple. And so this has been an open wound for 2000 years and certainly understandably, people have wanted to rebuild the temple, to build what they call the third temple. Reestablish this religion at its birthplace, there are a couple of problems with this. Exactly 500 years after Titus destroyed the temple in AD 70, in AD 570, a man called Muhammad was born in Mecca and built one of the world’s great religions, the world second largest religion as it stands today, in a very short period. His name was Muhammad. He was born Mecca. He died in nearby Medina. But in the meantime, he built or inspired the building of within 50 years of his death one of the great religious monuments in the world, certainly one of the prettiest, called the Dome of the Rock, and it’s in Jerusalem on Moriah, in fact, built over the foundation stone. And if you’ve ever been to Jerusalem, or if you ever seen photographs of it, you will remember vividly a gold dome. It’s called the Dome Of The Rock. Why is it called that? Because there’s a rock underneath it, the foundation stone, that is built on the site of the second temple. And that’s in what’s known is the aloxacomplex, there’s a mosque. Next door called Galexa Mosque, and that spot is one of three holy places, apparently co-equal holy places in Islam, Mecca, Medina, Dome of the Rock. So that is at the very center of Judaism, I mean, physically the center of Judaism, that spot, that exact spot over the foundation stone, and… And it has been occupied by a mosque. A mosque has been sitting there since the 7th century, since the late 600s. Amazing. You may be dimly aware of this. Now why go on at length about this? Because now is the moment, right now, like this week, is the the moment that some people, not a huge number, most people, Christians, Jews, Muslims, are not fully aware of all this, but some people are highly aware of it and would like begin the process of tearing down the Dome of the Rock, tearing down Al-Aqsa Mosque, and rebuilding the third temple. Now, there are a lot of things to say about this, about its likelihood, the potential effects of it, but first, just a quick side note on the theology of this from a Christian point of view. Now, it was Jesus who said this temple will be torn down, shocking everyone around to me, if it’s in the gospels, it’s at least a couple of the gospeles. And the people who heard it just couldn’t believe it. And of course, the people running the temple, the Pharisees and Sadducees were gravely offended by it. Why wouldn’t they be? But then it happened. Less than 40 years later, it actually happened. He was right, he called it. And so from a Christian perspective, he did that. God called for the destruction of the temple. And as Jesus says plainly in the Gospels, I’m the temple now. The temple will be rebuilt after three days. When I’m resurrected, I am the new temple. But there has been at least one attempt in the last 2,000 years to rebuild a physical third temple, and it happened in the fourth century. And it happened, without getting too far afield, shortly after the death of Constantino. Constantine was the fourth-century Roman emperor who converted to Christianity and very famously turned the Roman Empire Christian, thereby spreading Christianity basically instantly across the West, where it’s remained more or less. Ever since. That was in the 300s, the 4th century. Now, his nephew became emperor not long after he died, and his name was Julian, referred to very often by Christian historians as Julian the Apostate, and he was an apostate. He was the last non-Christian emperor of Rome, of the Roman Empire. And he had been born a Christian apparently, but he was a and very aggressively opposed to Christianity. And for that reason, he decided, Julian the apostate decided in 363 to rebuild the third temple. So it has been tried for those who were thinking, could this ever happen? Oh, it happened. They tried to rebuild. He spent a ton of money doing it in 36 3. What happened next? Well, let’s read the account of the only attempt ever made. At rebuilding the third temple, and this comes from a personal friend of Julian the Apostate’s who wrote it contemporaneously, and we still have it, amazingly, all these years later. I’m quoting, Julian thought to rebuild at an extravagant expense the proud temple once at Jerusalem and committed this task to Olympias of Antioch. Olympias set vigorously to work and was seconded by a governor of the province. When fearful balls of fire breaking out near the foundations of the building, continued their attacks till the workmen, after repeated scorchings, could approach no more. And he gave up the attempt. By the way, just a few months later, Julian, Emperor Julian the Apostate, was killed. You know what he was killed doing? Invading Iran. Literally, invading Iran in 363. Yeah, he was kill doing that. So it was during his invasion of Iran that he decided he decided to rebuild the temple You can’t make this up and we’re not making up And by the way, there was an earthquake at the same time. There are many accounts of what happened when they tried to rebuild it And all of them describe the earth rending and flames coming out and it all sounds kind of spooky and supernatural Like it’s just too perfect, right? Jesus tears down the temple and begins this new relationship with god directly through him No need for a building anymore in Jerusalem a city he went out of his way not to spend the night in, walk over to the Mount of Olives, even after the Last Supper, but whatever. And there’s this one attempt by a guy who hates Christianity to rebuild the third temple, and by the way, the workmen get burned by fire from the ground at an earthquake. And you can sort of laugh at that if you’re a rationalist, a materialist, and modern man until archeologists discover that actually there was a big earthquake in the region, galley to Jerusalem in 363. So that actually happened. In any case, why the long history lesson? Because it’s not history anymore. It’s happening right now. There are key players involved in this war, the one happening tonight, who believe that what we’re seeing on our television screens and on Twitter will usher in a series of events that begin with the destruction of the Dome of the Rock, Aksa Mosque, and then the rebuilding of the Third Temple, after which The world will end. God will come back. And by they we mean literally some of the guys fighting the war. So you may have read reports today that commanders in the field of American troops, a lot of them, and who knows if this is true but it’s out there, told their troops on the eve of the outbreak of this war that were doing this for Jesus because it is Jesus’ will that we do this and that by doing it we will in a series of events that bring about the end of history, the end of time, Armageddon, the last days. It’s hard to believe that’s true, especially since, by the way, there are a million Christians in Iran. So if you were doing this for Jesus, presumably you would go out of your way not to hurt his followers in the country you’re attacking. Did the U.S. Government or any government make any attempt to spare the Christians? Are we making an attempt tonight? Of course we’re not. And of course, when the smoke clears, ultimately, we will find out, just to guess, that Christians suffered disproportionately in this as they do all wars, from the Iraq War to the bombing of Nagasaki, the seat of the Christian church in Japan, et cetera, et cetera. Christians have a way of dying disproportionately in these wars, which tells you something about their real motive. But in any case, there was a spate of stories suggesting that U.S. Commanders told their troops they were doing this for some. Weird anti-christian reason posing as Christianity. But it’s not just the US side. Here’s an IDF soldier, apparently an American by his accent, describing why he’s at war. Watch this.

SOUNDBITE [00:20:50] They call this operation the Swords of Iron. But what are we really fighting for? We’re fighting for the right of the Jewish people to exist. Be Jewish, practice the religion, and be free. And one day, our true leader will come and will be united as a whole Jewish nation so we can rebuild the Beit HaVigdash.

Tucker [00:21:21] Betahamakdash, probably mispronouncing it. That’s the Hebrew term for the temple, the third temple. We are doing this so we can rebuild the temple. Now you’ll notice he’s pulling off patches on Velcro on his IDF uniform. These are not civilian clothes. This is the uniform of the government of Israel, of its military. And he has patches on that uniform, one of which is a symbol of the temple the third temple. So it just couldn’t be clearer. Why are we doing this? To rebuild the third Temple. Now, if you think we’re just. Cherry-picking this off the internet, one guy wearing an unauthorized temple patch paid for, by the way, a uniform paid by us, armaments paid for by us. The U.S. Taxpayer pays for all this stuff one way or another. The US taxpayer pays, for the military of Israel, boy does it. If you think we’re being unfair and just like found one guy… Well, here’s a bunch of guys. It took us about two minutes on the internet to find this today. Here is a selection of IDF soldiers. Let’s put it on the screen. And all of them have the same past. Look for me, look carefully at that. What is that? That’s the temple. That is the third temple. To a minute in a minute about how this might actually happen and what it would mean for the rest of the world. And just to be clear, these are conversations that most Americans, certainly me included, never wanted to have. Everybody’s religious beliefs, sincere religious beliefs when held up to the light of the rational world, to the man-made world seem a little spooky and crazy, which is one of the reasons that in the culture some of us grew up in, we don’t talk about them in public. Personal. They’re the most personal part of a person. So it is without judgment, by the way, that we’re airing this. Just describing it because it is significant to the future of the world, to the feature of this war, and to our future as Americans. So how exactly did the IDF, the Israel Defense Forces, a military that the U.S. Taxpayer pays for, that lots of wealthy Americans send money to, to friends of the IDS, how did all these guys wind up wearing patches suggesting the point of this War Was the destruction of one of the holiest places in islam and the rebuilding of a temple that is Totally anathema to christianity like how did this happen? Well, there are a lot of ways It happened the main way it happened is because no one in the united states noticed because it’s such a secular place And as noted we have eyes, but can’t see in ears and can’t hear but this has been going on a long time in public Through in part the efforts of a group called habad ch a B.A.D. And you may know people who give money to Habbad or run to Hbbad, super nice people, engaged in all kinds of charitable activities, drug rehab, you know, there’s a lot about Habbod that’s really good. But what is Habbat exactly? Well, Habbid, you can look it up, is a very old organization, about 250 years old, and it’s a branch of Hasidic Judaism. It’s an organization that was overseen for many years by a guy called Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, who was famously in Brooklyn, considered the Messiah by some of his followers. Who was a friend of Presidents or certainly someone Presidents visited. He was a very powerful man in the Orthodox and the Hasidic community, and he was the overseer of Chabad, which predated him and outlasted him, but he was its most visible ambassador. And Chabad has been pushing in a pretty subtle way, unless you look carefully, for the reconstruction of the third temple. And it seems like from the reading we did recently, that those patches actually came from Chabad. In any case, Chabad is pushing for the building of the Third Temple. But it’s not just Hasidic groups from Brooklyn, and it’s not just IDF soldiers. There are amazingly a lot of American evangelical leaders, Christian Zionists, whose main point is rebuilding the Third temple. Now, how could an American Christian or any Christian, call for the building of a temple. Whose presence, whose inherent presence denies… Said clearly, and Christians believe this, it’s a core point of faith, I am the temple. You want to speak to God, you speak through me. That’s Christianity, that’s the whole religion right there. So, if you’re a Christian preacher calling for the rebuilding of the third temple, you kind of missed the whole point. That is more than apostasy, that is like not even knowing what the religion is about. So it is hard to believe there could be any ordained Christian leaders pushing for the re-building of the Third Temple. Oh, but there a lot. They’re a lot. And here’s just one, this is Pastor Greg Locke. Listen to this.

SOUNDBITE [00:26:22] The Gaza Strip, which has now been cut off by Israel, and rightly so. They should have cut them off a long time ago. I don’t care how insensitive you think I am to that. There’s six doors in this church. You can leave anytime you want to. They’ve cut them off, you know, electricity, they’ve cut off the water, they should have. Now listen, I’m not for hurting anyone that’s innocent, but anybody that supports terrorism is not innocent. Do you understand that? Israel should make the Gaza Strip a parking lot by this time next week Destroy the whole thing what they ought to do is evacuate up there on the hill and get a great big missile and Blow that wicked dome of the rock plum off of the spot where it’s standing right now So we can get that third temple rebuilt and that’s you’re in the coming of Jesus

Tucker [00:27:24] Boy, it is embarrassing and shameful as an American Christian to hear that and to know that video’s from a few years ago. It’s been on the internet. No one bothered to highlight it. Most people weren’t even aware this was going on. Oh, it’s definitely going on, these are very common views. Seems obvious that Mike Huckabee has them, that a lot of the Christian Zionists, John Hagee, do you think just like Israel? They just like is Israel a lot. These are clerics, so their lives were informed by their religious views. What are their religious view? Well, you just heard it right there from Pastor Locke, who’s quite a prominent Christian Zionist. He’s not some lone wacko. And there he is with an Israeli flag waving behind him, casual calls for genocidal violence. Just blow it up, make it a parking lot. Well, two million people live there. What happens to them? They’re terrorist sympathizers. That right there is the tell. This is not Christianity. Imagine Jesus saying, Just kill them all. They’re terrorists. Is there anything in the gospel that suggests Jesus believed that? No, there’s a lot to suggest, in fact, to tell us in very clear terms. He thought the opposite. But the last part, let’s build the third temple and bring about the return of Jesus, is a direct contradiction of core Christian theology. And even people without theology degrees who didn’t go to some eminent Bible college can tell you, what? Jesus says, I am the temple. That is not Christianity. It’s not even a close facsimile of Christianity. It’s clearly evil. And it is, in some sense, the driving force behind the efforts to rebuild the Third Temple. Julian the Apostate, who was the last guy to try it, who died invading Iran, he was not Jewish. He was a pagan, just like Pastor Locke. But for some reason, he was the instrument of trying to do this. There are many! Of these people, and not just in the theological realm, in the political realm. And that’s relevant to you, whether you believe in God or not, or are interested in the history of the Abrahamic faiths or not. Global leaders believe this. People you wouldn’t expect, and you wonder, what is going on here? It’s enough to make the hair in your arms go up. Did everyone know there was an effort to rebuild the third temple and the foundation Except me? I can’t believe I was left out of this conversation. No, all of us took place in public. And if we’d been paying attention or been tuned into that frequency, the spiritual frequency, we’ve been spiritually sensitive enough to pay attention, we would have known this. But of course, when you grew up in a materialist culture, when the only things you believe are real are the things that can be measured or purchased on Amazon, you tend to miss a lot. And we missed this. Here’s the president of Argentina, Javier Miele, who we know personally, at the Western Wall, which is believed by some to be a remnant of the Second Temple, the last stone from the Second temple, that’s the claim. Here he is there, the famous Wailing Wall, saying this, watch the subtitles.

SOUNDBITE [00:30:42] There is a prophecy about the destruction that says that a fox will break into the holiest of holies. There is another prophecy that says the same place will be rebuilt. Now that I see with my own eyes how to fulfill the first prophecy. Now that i see. With my own eyes, the first prophecy come true. I laugh in joy and full of hope, as the second prophecy will surely come true.”

Tucker [00:31:26] So, a correction. That doesn’t appear to be the Western Wall, and there were no subtitles. You heard him say it through his translator. I laugh and quiver with joy when I think about the third temple being rebuilt. Now, this is the supposedly, maybe, who knows, Catholic president of an overwhelmingly Catholic country, South American country, wonderful country, Argentina, who got elected and was presented to American news consumers as a libertarian Economist who is gonna fix their debt problem and get rid of inflation and just make life better for Argentines. And there he is in Jerusalem saying that he’s weeping with joy thinking about the return, the rebuilding of the third temple. What the hell is that? You would think that would not even be on his to-do list if you’re running a country as complex and damaged as Argentina and as promising and great as Argentina, but like there’s a lot of things you gotta do in Argentina if you running it. But you take time to fight at Israel and say, the thing you really want in life is the rebuilding of the third temple? What is going on here? And why haven’t we talked about this before? Say, before we invaded Iran with troops who say out loud, we’re doing this to bring about the creation of the Third Temple. Why weren’t the rest of us informed? Now here’s a piece of tape you may have seen, and that I personally don’t want to play since I know the guy and I like him, but it does make you wonder. So this is the current Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, former Fox News employee. Nice man. Very nice man. 2018 in Jerusalem, and as someone who knew him well, I can tell you I had no idea that he had such evolved and specific and apparently very informed opinions on rebuilding the third temple of all questions. This is not something they teach you in Sunday school in the Presbyterian Church. This is something that people talk about at dinner in the United States. This is nothing our Congress ever mentions, that the President ever talks about. This is considered so esoteric and weird and crypto-historical and religious and kind of culty and what’s a bad and no one ever mentions it. But here’s Pete Hegseth, football player from Princeton, going on about it in a way that suggests he’s thought a lot about it. This is 2018.

SOUNDBITE [00:33:55] Today, Jennifer and I had a chance to go see the western wall of the Temple Mount. The western wall tunnels, so much of the old city. And as you stand there, you can’t help but behold the miracle before you. And it got me thinking about another miracle that I hope all of you don’t see too far away. Because 1917 was a miracle. 1948 was a miracles. 1967 was a Miracle. 2017, the declaration of Jerusalem as the capital was a miracle, and there’s no reason why the miracle of the re-establishment of the temple on the Temple Mount is not possible. I don’t know how it would happen, you don’t know how would happen but I know that it could happen.

Tucker [00:34:50] What is that? That’s the secretary of war right now, overseeing the war with Iran, that people fighting it are starting to say actually is about rebuilding this third temple. It’s the same man. Okay, this is the point where you begin to think, maybe we should have talked about this and its implications. And what are its implications? Religious war? Religious war? The first heavily publicized move by the United States military and the Israeli military in this conflict was to kill the head of state of Iran, the 86-year-old Aitola Aitolo. Replaced today by his son, who’s apparently more anti-Western than he was, so I guess strictly speaking, that wasn’t very effective. But if you take three steps back, and no one did because everyone’s busy denouncing him as Hitler and the most evil man in the world and we’re so grateful he’s dead, when was the last time the United States military or the Israeli working in conjunction with the Israeli military, killed the head of a world religion. Is that wise? It’s not because we agree with all world’s religions, it’s not an endorsement of Shia Islam to say maybe we should pause before killing its 86-year-old leader. It is instead an acknowledgement that that might have consequences that affect the United States and Europe and the world, but particularly the United State, since we are the United states and we have children and hope to have grandchildren, and what will be the downstream effects for them? When you kill a religious leader. Did killing the religious leader cripple their command and control structure? Were they unable to launch missiles and drones when we killed the 86-year-old Ayatollah? No. Because he knew he was gonna be killed. That’s why he stayed above ground, apparently. He wanted to be martyred. Now, why would he wanna be martyred? Maybe because he wanted a religious war. Why did we kill him? Maybe because we wanted a religion war. Now, Why would we want that? Why would the Israelis who got us into this war, everyone admits that now, sorry, why would they want that? I don’t know. Think about what would happen if this war leads to the destruction of the Dome on the Rock and the Al-Aqsa complex on Mount Moriah in Jerusalem. And we’ll explain in a second how that could happen. A war that began with the killing of the head of Shia Islam. What would happen? Well, here are the numbers. There are about 15 and a half million Jews in the world total. There are 2.5 billion Christians and there are about 2 billion Muslims. So whatever happens next is not going to be a fight between the Muslims and the Jews because 2 billion versus 15 million, not much of a fight. This is likely to be, if not brought under control immediately, or maybe it’s too late, a war, a religious war, the one that Lindsey Graham just described, between Muslims and Christians. And it’s not going to play out in the Middle East because this is a regional conflict, but as noted at the beginning, it’s a global conflict where every big power has a stake in what happens. This will play out globally and it’ll play out in our cities. Islam is the fastest growing religion in the United States. There are not that many Muslims in the U.S. What, five million or something like that? But it’s the fastest-growing religion. That’s enough to cause problems. For sure, in Europe, 65 million Muslims, second biggest religion in every European country, fastest growing in every country. Australia, same thing. Second biggest, fastest growing. New Zealand, same things. Second biggest fastest growing, Canada, same think. What happens in all those countries? Those Christian, Western, white countries. What happens there? If there’s the religious war that Lindsey Graham and clearly the Israeli government and some in our government are hoping for, what happens? Those countries suffer more than they have suffered. And so it’s possible that the real target here, it’s just possible, it’s thrown this out there, is not the mullahs in Iran, it is us. As it always has been. But don’t take our word for it. Here’s a particularly candid and honestly kind of articulate clip from a couple of years ago. This is from August of 2024 from an Israeli rabbi, Joseph Misrach, describing how Israel should take advantage of a then ongoing conflict with Iran, much less intense than the current conflict we’re seeing with Iran, to destroy… The Dome of the Rock and Al-Aqsa. Watch this.

SOUNDBITE [00:39:58] If it was up to me, the last time when they shot hundreds of missiles, I would pretend that one missile came from Iran and shoot it down. You know, then all the Arabs will go against Iran and it will be the end of the problems. You make them fight with each other, this bunch of lunatics. Never too late, you deal with a bunch of cowards.

Tucker [00:40:23] Shoot it down into the Dome of the Rock in Al-Aqsa, destroy what’s on what the Israelis call the Temple Mount on the foundation stone, destroy it, and blame the Iranians. And that has the effect, as you just heard him say, of turning our enemies against each other. Turning our enemies again each other, although they’ve refused to recognize it for quite some time, the Europeans are the enemies. The mortal enemies of the Israelis. That’s the Israeli perspective, obviously. Look at the effects. And so, if that were to happen in this conflict, it’s not the Israelis who would bear the brunt of it. It’s the Europeans, it’s the Canadians, it’s The Australians, and it’s us, and it is the Russians. 20% of Russia is Muslim. All of those countries would be in for serious. Turmoil and bloodshed, and maybe already, this shortly into the war. Turn them against each other, you heard the rabbi say. Now how could this play out? Very simple. Iran is sending drones and missiles into Israel right now, mostly into Tel Aviv. Is it beyond imagination that in the fog of war, maybe one of those missiles hits the Dome of the Rock, or were told that it did? And of course, during war, the first thing you see is censorship, so it’s very hard to know what’s going on. You’re already seeing it today. Is there less or more video available on the internet today than there was yesterday from this war? Well, there’s much less, of course. That’s called censorship. They’re censoring video of what’s actually happening. It happens in every conflict. Every war sets off the same cycle at home, far from the fighting. Censorship and persecution. Censorship and persecution, persecution of… The enemies, real or perceived, to the people prosecuting the war, and censorship of their views. So in that environment, when you can’t really know what’s going on, it’s thousands of miles from here, all of a sudden, the Auxa complex has just vaporized. Oops, the Iranians did it. Then we have this debate. It’s like a hospital bombing in Gaza. Who did it? Well, it was a booster from a Hamas rocket. Well, how do I know I wasn’t there? All we know is it’s gone. Oh, so sorry. Could that happen? Oh, yeah, it could happen. The army is fighting with patches of the third temple on their arms, on their official uniforms. And what happens then? Global religious war. Talk about high stakes. You thought nukes were high stakes? At least nukers are over quickly. There are survivors. A generational religious war? That’s worse than any virus and more deadly. That could happen. Do the people in charge know it could happen? Some of them do. They don’t seem worried about it, they should be. We should all be worried about and we shall be noisy about it. No, you can’t do that to the world. We hope to give to our grandchildren. So what is going on in this war? It’s, again, hard to know because of the censorship, but there is a man, an independent analyst called Brandon Weickert, who we think, after spending a lot of time looking at analysis from a bunch of different people, is one of the most informed people in the United States who can speak freely and publicly about what is actually happening, and not just in a conceptual big picture way, but in a detailed way. And coming at this with an understanding of the technology in use, the tactics and the strategies. We’ve been super impressed and we think you will be too. With that, Brandon Wicker joins us now. Brandon, thank you so much for coming on.

Brandon Weichert [00:44:10] Thank you for having me. And thank you for those kind words. That was very I’m very honored.

Tucker [00:44:14] Well so we’ve never met but i’ve just been watching your stuff recently in you know wars tend to bring out phonies and people like all i was on seal team twenty seven and i know what’s going on they don’t know anything uh… But your analysis is part of the nerd

Brandon Weichert [00:44:26] I’m just a nerd. Yeah, well.

Tucker [00:44:27] I have been very impressed by your by your grasp of what’s happening. So, can you just give us really quickly the overview of where we are today? What are the big developments?

Brandon Weichert [00:44:36] Well the big developments as you saw with Secretary of War, I guess he’s calling himself now, Hegseth is, they’re transitioning the munitions. So now the claim is that it’s been so successful this air war, they don’t need to use what’s known as standoff weapons. So think the Tomahawk cruise missile. And they’re going to now shift the Air Force and the Israeli Air Force are going shift now to flying large sorties of warplanes. Into Iran and bombing targets with what are known as gravity bombs, and these are things like the Joint Directed Attack Munitions, JDAMs, they require you to be close to the target. So the risk factor to our pilots is now increasing exponentially. But I would just like to posit a theory, and it’s just a theory. I actually think the real reason we are doing this shift is not because of realities or facts on the ground that are amenable. To the U.S. And Israeli strategic position. I think we are being dictated to by the depletion of our stockpiles. And what I mean by that, I have some numbers for your audience. We all know the Tomahawk cruise missile going back to the Clinton era where he would just pop those things off, you know, as soon as the Lewinsky impeachment got underway. 4,000 Tomahawks land attack, cruise missiles are believed to be in the arsenal. We have been draining those since 2022, 2023 in Ukraine at a disproportionate rate. In the last four days of this conflict, we have expended 400 of those systems, which means that’s 100 per day with the operational and tempo not ceasing. In 2026, the budget request was only for 59 new missiles. We need several hundreds every year The reason we’re getting such low numbers Tucker is because our defense industrial base is broken and we have no business starting a world war or a major regional war as we are in the process of doing. So I believe the real reason the the US and Israeli militaries are starting to get more daring and dangerous with their airstrikes is because they cannot afford to blow through the Munitions that are already depleting and it is in fact a race to depletion between us and iran and right now i think the iranians still have a very sizable unused increasingly sophisticated missile arsenal colonel rob mayness is a friend of mine he’s in a former air force colonel he disagrees with me he says look these these missiles that are being popped off by iran are basically a bunch of dead-enders it’s going to fizzle out and hegg seth made a sort of argument about that today that there was a decrease but i actually think that those dead-enders if That’s what you want to call them. Actually are probably still combat effective and that is why we are now having to still continue the war Even though we have blown through these standoff munitions Which really were protecting our people. In fact, I got word from a source of mine who’s monitoring this On open source, which it looks like the uss abraham lincoln is going to be repositioned to within Anti-ship ballistic missile range of iran so either The U S really believes we’ve degraded the Iranian capabilities sufficiently, or we’re just throwing caution to the wind because we got to get this thing over before we run out of materials. And that’ll probably start happening this weekend.

Tucker [00:48:12] This is not a surprise to people who watched carefully the few days in the run-up to this conflict where there were uniformed service men. I mean, there were flag officers who apparently made this case. That’s right, by Semer Cotcher. Yes. Exactly. That we just don’t have the munitions to sustain any kind of real conflict. They said that, right?

Brandon Weichert [00:48:34] Yeah, in fact, it is my understanding and this is again take from this what you will Uh, it’s my understanding that last friday. The order went out at 3 38 pm eastern Uh before that there was a quote particularly contentious meeting between general Dan raisin cain who is trump’s hand-picked chairman of the joint chiefs of staff He was pulled out of retirement, uh by trump. So this is trump sky And Cain tried to get to the word to the president that this thing is not going to go like you think it is. This is not Venezuela. This is a very different operation. And the president, for whatever reason, still decided to ignore the best military advice he got and went forward with this. In turn, Vice-Emeral Fred Cotcher, who was an adjutant, basically, to Cain, leaked parts of that meeting to, I think it was Reuters. Now, the question that I’ve been hearing from people is uh was that Kochert acting on his own volition or was that in fact Kochert executing some kind of informal order from Dan Cain because Cain is the rest of the military is very the high level is very worried about the blowback from this operation and it is my contention that they the permanent bureaucracy is desperately trying to push blame away from itself to the politicians. And even as we’re seeing Marco Rubio now to Israel itself, which is not how a winning war would look like, there’d be no blame shifting.

Tucker [00:50:06] So do you have any insight into how the decision was made to kill Iran’s head of state slash chief cleric and I this has not been a conversation anyone’s been willing to have because of course the proponents of it have been screaming about how he’s hitler he’s the worst person if there’s any question about whether it’s a good idea to kill him you’re a you’re an ayatollah lover you know just the normal low iq crap that you see on fox news but it’s real question like why would what what was the thinking there do you know

Brandon Weichert [00:50:35] So, again, this is all, you know, background and sort of piecing the puzzle together with what I know about how it works up in that horrible city we call D.C., but basically, what it sounds like is the administration used the idea of diplomatic talks to lull Kimani into a false sense of security. Uh… We were going into a holy week at that time and the iranians wanted or kamani wanted to basically come out of his hole and uh… He thought okay we’re gonna get a reprieve will will kick this down the road until monday which i think was march second they got the word on friday that hey were open to negotiating so kamani and his cadre let their guard down and at the moment they did israeli uh… Missiles were fired at a very interesting was actually If I can nerd out here for a second. The Israelis did a very interesting performance with their missile where they fired it into space from I believe F-16s or F-35s. It went into the space above Iran and came down at hypersonic velocities and it came within millimeters of the known position of Khamani. So from a tactical standpoint, yes, it was very technically impressive, but the key thing here was that the US used its honor in till wall the the counterparty into a false sense of security using our diplomatic word that hey we’re we’re gonna hold off and try to talk to you and i actually think i says is somebody’s a fantasy what cop i actually think what coffin probably kushner uh… We’re probably in on the whole thing with uh… To to basically wall uh… The iranian uh… Leader into a falseness of security so we could clip him and i think talker I think the assumption… Was that if we lopped off the head of the regime, Kamani, that the whole thing would implode like a house of cards in about 72 hours, which is why I think Trump didn’t really care when Dan Cain was warning him last Friday that, hey, we’ve got eight days of munitions in CENTCOM before we have to start cannibalizing Indo-PECOM, and then we have a real crisis on our hands. I think, Trump was thinking, ah, we can probably do this in about 24 to 72 hours. We’ll get Kamani, the Israelis will. And then it’ll all work out. It’s all gonna, it’s all going to work out and obviously nobody took the time to brief the president on, and I could have done, I wrote a whole book about it, on basically what the Iranians have been doing for pretty much 47 years to harden their regime and to make it relatively survivable. And that is why now we find ourselves, what is it day four or day five now, and they’re already having to panic and change the munitions structure. Because we’re depleting them too fast. This is why by the way the heads of those defense Uh companies are now being summoned to the white house because trump is going to try to read those leaders Uh the riot act saying you got to boost production and they’re going to say to him Sorry, we can’t do it because the defense industrial base is both broken and corrupt

Tucker [00:53:41] I don’t know the truth about what you said about the diplomacy as a cover for action lulling community into vulnerability. I have heard just the opposite, that the Israelis are telling everybody that the U.S. Knew the strike was going to happen and they’re doing that to shake the faith of any of our partners in the region in our diplomacy and make us sound just like that. That is that would

Brandon Weichert [00:54:05] I don’t know what the truth is. Well, obviously, like I said, take from this, because this is all, you know, I don’t have evidence of this to present to you. I don’t either. But I find it, just if I can speculate here for a moment, I find impossible or improbable to think, given the level of fusion between the US and Israeli command and, I mean, for goodness sakes, there are Israeli officers permanently stationed in the Pentagon. And I was just told by a former CIA case officer at Langley. So, basically, I find it really hard to believe that the administration did not have any involvement in this. Now, they want to say that they didn’t, and I think they are saying this because they’re worried that there’s going to be significant political and possibly legal blowback, you know, over time, because this war is, anyway. But so I don’t believe that particular story when they say, oh, we had nothing to do with it. I think we probably did not have an active role in the sense of bombardment. But I do believe that we were aware of what was going to happen and I think we probably nudged it along.

Tucker [00:55:09] If that’s true, that’s one of the craziest things that’s ever happened. I mean, we’re trying to negotiate an end to the war we’ve been waging against Russia, which is right at the- Are we? Well, exactly. And the Russians aren’t stupid, the Iranians aren’t, stupid. Not everyone other than us is stupid, and which is our assumption. They’re all a bunch of savages. They’re are all posthunes, you know, living in the Hindu Kush, but they’re not, actually. They’re really smart. And they look at this like, why would we enter into negotiations with the same negotiating team that just did this? So… But here’s my macro question, which is, what about the safety of the United States? Like, when you kill an 86-year-old leader of a global religion, which Shia Islam is, it’s the smaller but still enormous branch of Islam, you’re going to expect to create religious extremism. You kill the religious leader during Ramadan? Like, was there no one in the room? And I know you’re not supposed to say this because it makes you like a Muslim lover or something. I just want to say that as a Jesus person, but as an American who wants peace in my own country. Nobody stood up and said like, hey, what are we doing here? Like, we’re going to create a generational war that our grandkids are going to have to deal with at the shopping mall. Did anyone say that?

Brandon Weichert [00:56:24] No, I think I think general Kane was the closest and he was making sort of a tactical technical argument And I have to say as much as I do like the general and I do Like him. I think he’s a decent guy yeah, I I think i think he has gone down in my book a little bit because he didn’t resign in protest because Whatever they’re saying in public the logistics does it’s like math. It doesn’t lie. It’s it’s gravity. It. Doesn’t lie And uh, the logistics are not in our favor if this becomes Trump said it was a forever war yesterday. Now he’s putting in sneer quotes, but you know, this could become at least a five to eight week war. Hegseth said eight weeks today. And so I’m starting to remember COVID and two weeks to flatten the curve became, you know years of, you now, dealing with fallout. So I am very concerned that the president has really bad advisors. These are not people that I think have the best interests of MAGA or America First, the coalition that got him elected in their hearts. I think these are these are deep staters masquerading as MAGA lovers. And I think that that this is why we’re here. This is one of the most strategically irresponsible moves I’ve ever seen. And the fact that the president I don’t believe was informed the truth about what was going to happen in the way it was going to happen. I think now that’s why you’re seeing the administration expanding the war, talking about giving Kurds weapons and money, and we’re going to now expand it into Iraq and destabilize Iraq as if that’s another thing we need on our plate. This to me is somebody who, this to me, is a country that has made a very serious mistake with triggering this war, and now they’re just making the mess bigger and and bigger hoping that they can clean it up once it’s totally you know, out of hand or maybe they don’t even want to clean it up. I don’t know. That’s speculation. But I do believe that we were involved on some level with what was going on behind the scenes the day that, and by the way, I have to make something clear. I am very much anti Islamic Republic of Iran, that regime, all of that. I’ve I’m on the record. People know this about me. So I’m not saying this because I’m mourning the loss of Kamani, but, but it is, it, it is very dangerous what we’re doing. And I think that we really damaged America’s credibility for a long time. For a long time when it comes to diplomacy.

Tucker [00:58:48] Yeah, I mean, I’m not gonna put up with that for one second, that whole like, call your patriotism, some guy working for Israel is calling me unpatriotic in a country that my ancestors founded. I don’t think I’m gonna play along with that at all. And it’s shocking that they would even be throwing that out there at the most patriotic people in the world, I bet you have. So let me, I think you look at this and it’s so heartbreaking and it so potentially catastrophic that you keep thinking, all right, point made. Can we pull back? Can we just pull back and declare victory and go home in the famous phrase? Are we at a place where that’s possible?

Brandon Weichert [00:59:23] Well, I’m reminded of a 2004 interview that Donald Trump gave to your old colleague, Neil Cavuto, and it was during the Iraq war at the height of the insurgency. And at the time everybody made fun of Trump, but I thought it was brilliant. Trump told George W. Bush on that interview. He said, listen, just declare victory, bring everybody home. We got Saddam. You’ve won. Let’s just call it a day and let the middle East figure out the mess. Now people mocked him at the time, but I actually thought actually that’s probably the best at that time way out top bad IRGC guys. He can claim that. He has done what he can to help the people. There is a way forward. It’s a golden off-ramp, but he’s got to take it in the next probably 48 hours, because if he doesn’t take it, Tucker, this thing takes on a life of its own. The Iranians are not going to surrender. They’re not going stop popping off missiles. They have planned for this, like I said, for 47 years. Yeah, they’re degraded. Yeah They’re hurt. But so are our allies, by the way, and the oil coming out of the region is not coming out of region. We are now looking at spikes in the price of energy. I saw a report from Seeking Alpha, which is an investment publication, saying that if this continues for four to eight weeks, this could take oil over $200 a barrel. That’s recession territory going into a midterm election

Tucker [01:00:52] Yeah, so I think 200 is depression is to I mean, well, who knows? Yeah, but I think that’s

Brandon Weichert [01:00:56] That’s extreme. Yeah, that’s the extreme person. I mean, yeah, listen, listen They’re destroying not they’re not just blockading the straight They’re destroy the refineries in Qatar in Saudi Arabia and the Qataris are saying they’re Not gonna get this stuff online for months if not years So that’s gonna be a gaping hole in the global economy for for oil and natural gas So even if Trump gets a quote victory here in Iran, and I don’t even know what victory looks like anymore We’re going to be cleaning up this mess economically for many many years thereafter

Tucker [01:01:31] that all of that is awful all of it is they don’t come

Brandon Weichert [01:01:35] They don’t call me Dr. Doom for nothing.

Tucker [01:01:37] All of it is manageable though. You can imagine working through those problems and convincing yourself that it was worth it somehow, or you know, you could concoct a story to tell yourself. There are certain things that are not possible to recover from. And one is the use of unconventional, you know highly destructive weapons that just change the calculation forever. And I worry about that. And everyone I ask that is, oh no, no, that would never happen. Do you worry about it?

Brandon Weichert [01:02:07] Yeah, yeah, yeah. So I think I tweeted about this in the last 24 hours Trump Trump responded to what I’ve been writing And I I’m not gonna get into how I know that but but he he somebody told him what I’d been writing And he’s quite cross with me and you know, I’m a I’m gonna three times supporter of Trump I’m saying this out of love, you know not out of hate But I was told that the statement he made yesterday in the Oval Office was partly responding to my claims about the stockpiles and he said something very specific. He said, not only we have enough weapons to fight a quote forever war, which holy cow, but he said that we’re depleted a little bit on the, and I’m paraphrasing, on the lower level weapons, but we’ve got enough higher end and middle tier weapons to fight forever. Well, the higher end weapons would be things like, I don’t know, low yield nuclear weapons. Uh… And you know you don’t want to think that american president would go there especially over something like this where we weren’t attacked which we were not and i i’m not a fan of the iranian regime and they do support there but we were out of tact the israelis weren’t even attacked uh… This was all sort of the machinations of netanyahu’s worst fears uh… Man and uh… It is my concern that if we truly are reaching depletion that we might have an incident where a nuke is used. And it’s not the likeliest, but it’s no longer impossible. It’s now moved into sort of the realm of it could happen. And the longer this goes on and the more that we run through these stockpiles and if we start losing planes to some of the remaining Iranian air defense systems. Then we’re going to have some problems and I want to also say something about the strategic side I was on an uh was on bannon show earlier today And there was one of the guests was saying basically saying I was wrong and maybe I am but you know, who knows? Um, but He was saying that we’ve got local air superiority and from there We’ll be able to grow out and go farther and the only reason you get local air Superiority is because you’ve degraded the enemy so much Well, yes and no but That’s just a small slice of a very large country. Uh… They probably in iran if they’ve decentralized those missile capabilities to the local commander level anticipating that we would degrade command and control they likely have hidden and decentralized their air defense capabilities uh… And that means we have to do sort of a long-term air defense hunt and in the meanwhile the iranians are still combat effective uh… In the longer this last them the longer that straight is closed down the more the oil is disrupted. And basically, the more we get to these really nightmare scenarios, in my book, I said a war over Iran will likely trigger a World War Three. Now that book came out in 2022. I remain convinced that we are at the opening salvo of a true World War, and it’s happening because of our actions and the actions of our partner, Israel.

Tucker [01:05:19] I would say, even more precisely, it’s happening because of Benjamin Netanyahu and the hammerlock he has over the American government, including Mossad officers at CIA headquarters and IDF officers at the Pentagon.

Brandon Weichert [01:05:33] Yeah, that one came from a you would know this individual. He’s a very famous CIA guy. Got off the phone with him about an hour before I came on with you. And and and it’s scary. It’s I mean, remember, though, Gary Vogler, who wrote a great book for the Libertarian Institute, it was called I think Israel was the winner of the 2003 Iraq war or something like that. He was an oil guy working for the Coalition Provisional Authority, and he identified this guy named Makovsky, who was a Pentagon bureaucrat. Who ran the iraq war desk for the first part of the irak war in a three and he was a massage officer not just idea few and he was done five son-in-law so you know this is uh… You know our car country is is is unfortunately not being run entirely by the united states in the north

Tucker [01:06:19] American people. No, it doesn’t, you don’t see a lot of sovereignty. I’ll get emails for that one, I’m sure. Well, it’s true. It’s factually true. The Secretary of State, God bless him, admitted that two days ago and said we did this because Israel made us do it. They were gonna go anyway. So what about the question of hypersonic weapons? You read that Iran has them, they’ve been given them.

Brandon Weichert [01:06:38] Oh, yeah, they’ve got them. In fact, I got an interesting report from overseas yesterday. And again, you know, these are sort of I take with a grain of salt, but they’ve been right. And when they’re right, though, they’re really right. This one came from our friends in Russia. So take from this what you will. But the report that I received was a retired Russian general is telling the press over there that he knows for a fact there is a cluster of Chinese high tech officers or technical officers on the ground in Iran right now. Perfecting and maintaining iran’s growing they’re still building them uh… Growing hypersonic weapons capability and the reason is because the chinese want to test the systems because they’re basically very similar to the chinese a s b m which of course when and if and i really hope it’s if uh… The war with china erupts the first thing the chinese are going to do after they knock out our satellites and disrupt our electromagnetic frequencies. Is they’re going to use thousands of a s b m’s ringed in those man-made islands to either keep our carriers at bay so that we can’t launch planes in range or to sink or destroy the carriers flight deck uh… And the iranians are the teddy or iran rather is the test bed the same way that we’ve been using ucraine as a test bed against russian tech And so, the Iranians have them. Uh… They’re buried in those underground missile cities they have not really fired them i i i believe they fired for ballistic missiles at the carrier after kamani was killed that was a symbolic attack though if the iranians really wanted to go ham on the carrier with his missile swarm they absolutely could be only thing that would be preventing them was if we had degraded their c two functions enough and I at that time I don’t believe we had.

Tucker [01:08:28] Function.

Brandon Weichert [01:08:29] I’m sorry that’s command and control so basically their ability to control their systems uh… An issue commands that’s why before the war began the iranians uh… Basically the government said to their local field commanders were going to give you permission to take command of your individual missile battery so that if something like killing kamani happens you can just start going and you won’t have to call in for orders or for rain And by the way, the Chinese are using their Yaogan, I think it’s their Yaogon satellite constellation to do surveillance of the carrier and of the US air bases in the region and they are providing increasingly accurate targeting sets to the Iranians. In fact, I believe the reason the Iranian missiles have been so effective in damaging our bases and boy have they done a doozy, it is not being reported accurately. They have done a real doozy to these bases uh… It’s because of the fact that the chinese are providing direct real-time signals intelligence and elect and and electronic assistance to the iranians

Tucker [01:09:32] So we’re fighting a proxy war with China right now.

Brandon Weichert [01:09:35] It’s a world war. I mean, this is a world War and the Chinese are more than happy to see us Stu now there’s this there’s like story that uh, the politicians keep telling us It’s really the republican side that keeps saying this that well, you know We went after Venezuela and we went after Iran and that’s gonna really kill china because they they rely on these countries for their oil It’s not really accurate. Um, the chinese got less than I think four percent of their oil from venezuela It was a nuisance, if anything, to lose. If anything, they were sinking more money into rebuilding the refining capacity because the communists had ruined the oil industry in Venezuela over 25 years. And then with Iran, they get at most I think, I think 14% of their oil and natural gas from Iran. What they were doing is the Chinese knew because they could read the room. They knew we were going in. So what they started doing was shifting their purchases of oil from iran to places like neighboring russia and to other middle eastern countries in fact i think that the largest amount of oil purchased by china in saudi arabia occurred two weeks before the war began well this will hurt the chinese absolutely economically it’s not going to trigger a collapse it’s market the chinese were prepared for this just as the russians were prepared for what we were going to throw at them in 2022. These regimes have been studying us for years, for years and they know our pressure points. And you know, we’re like the gentle giant, we are like the lovable giant. We’re just too stupid to realize, you know these people are serious and they’re killers, they’re killer and you know we’re trying to lecture the world about transgendered rights in Namibia and you now these guys are playing hardball and they are playing for keeps. And I was actually speaking to Brendan O’Reilly, who’s probably one of the foremost. Uh… China scholars uh… Real real world intelligence type uh… Scholar practitioner uh… He wrote a great book called everybody is everyone is wrong about china and uh… I just talked to him this afternoon and he tells me he’s convinced that at the end of the day the real winner of this conflict is china of court and we are going and i think actually this this this conflict worst-case scenario because you you lay out a pretty bleak scenario to uh… But work worst- case scenario is this is the end American military power for a generation.

Tucker [01:12:02] I mean, I think that’s clear the goal, and that’s up to us at this point. I mean the second you, it’s the same in a fist fight, the second punch someone, everybody standing around finds out how tough you actually are. Would you say, would you say? But the second, the blows start, it like we know, and you don’t always want to reveal that, it’s better to keep it mysterious, I would say. Same with nudity, like none of us look better naked. So, but I would, okay, so the hypersonic, Weapons missiles, which yeah, they possess. Um, yeah, you suggest they might be deployed against Surface aircraft, right? Yes. What about Israel?

Brandon Weichert [01:12:43] Yeah, so yeah, yeah. Yeah. So you’ve got you’ve Got two classes of hypersonics as well I apologize. I was fixated on the carrier because I got that text but yeah, so you got the you got The Maritime targeting of Surface warships, but then you also have what you’ve seen a couple of times in the last year Where the Iranians did deploy hypersonix against Israel and it did an incredible amount of damage To Tel Aviv if I remember correctly in the 12-day war and I think although this might have been AI I think in the last 48 hours they deployed another the Iranians did another hypersonic against Tel Avive that did a lot of damage So the these hypersonic weapons there is no active defense against them are our air defense systems Kenna and the problem is it’s really what makes them very interesting is They come in fast and then they sort of zigzag unpredictably right before they land And this is the problem for our AD systems, our air defense systems, because they sort of just track and then go. But if you’ve got a target coming in and then they, you know, those AD systems are not because the AD systems or older and they they’re they’re based on older generation being able to track incoming regular ballistic missiles. So this is where we get real concern because we I don’t think we really know how many hypersonic weapons they’ve got. I would imagine they’ve got at least, I would say at least a hundred or so because they’ve been just churning them out and the Chinese have been helping them and of course the Chinese have overmatched with us in terms of industrial mass production.

Tucker [01:14:19] What is the damage right now to Israel and to U.S. Bases in the Gulf?

Brandon Weichert [01:14:25] But well, well, the the bases in the Gulf, you know, I wish I had kept the window open that I was reading. But basically, at least three of the bases have been devastated. The Fifth Fleet headquarters, I am told. And if you look at the satellite imagery that you can find on open source information, it looks like actually the base in Bahrain looks like Gaza. It’s completely moonscape. So the the American 5th fleet now, I don’t believe I don’t know if there’s any because I think we might have evacuated that base before this started. So I don’t, I don’t want to say there’s casualties, because I don’s know. But just looking at those satellite images that it looks like that’s been flattened. And that’s a very expensive base that you and I paid for. And t was the sort of the hub for the US Navy in the Middle East for many years. And it has been completely taken off line. And I have serious doubt. I was talking also to a Middle East expert not long ago. And he was saying that with these bases being obliterated, basically, to use a term, essentially, he doesn’t think, because he thinks the Arabs are going to be so irate with us for having kicked over this hornet’s nest, because it is not going to end anytime soon. His belief is that once the war does end or settles down For us to say hey, we’re good. We’re done the Arabs are going to say you’re not building back in our in our countries anymore.

Tucker [01:15:49] Why would they? We didn’t defend them. I mean, this is a reciprocal relationship. They’re not doing this because they love us. They give us deals on billions, hundreds of billions in foreign investment in the United States, all this. But in exchange, we promised to protect them and we didn’t.

Brandon Weichert [01:16:06] That’s right and in fact there’s there’s reports and i think the credible uh… In fact the saudi officials complaining about this two days ago basically whatever air defense systems were in these arab countries were sent over to israel yet and they actually left our own bases and people uh… Vulnerable our own government did to protect israeli targets rather than to protect our our men and women in uniform

Tucker [01:16:28] Do you believe that’s true? Do you think the U.S. Government prioritized Israel over our own troops?

Brandon Weichert [01:16:33] If you had asked me this a year or two ago, I would have said no way. But after seeing that Huckabee interview, by the way, bravo, after seeing that Huckebe interview, I can’t imagine how we didn’t do that. I mean, it is very clear the United States is being led around the nose right now by what should be its proxy. I mean let’s get it real. I mean of course it should be, you know.

Tucker [01:16:54] They’re the housekeeper, we’re the homeowner. Like, what is this? I don’t get it. No, I’m serious. I don’t understand. I agree.

Brandon Weichert [01:16:58] I agree. I agree so so I do believe yeah, we probably did and the worst part here One of the worst parts is I have a colleague who’s who’s in the Gulf states and he tells me he sent me a picture of the warning he got from the State Department to get out and To cut to cut to the chase and basically said you’re on your own to get our like we’re not doing flights We’re not true. And meanwhile, I hear that until 24 hours ago. The British government was evacuating their people. No questions asked So you mean to tell me that the sole superpower is picking a fight with this missile city that is Iran, and we’re not even going to provide exfiltration for our people. That’s not an empire. That’s a superpower. That’s the power in decline. That’s what the Chinese see, by the way. And the Chinese think their time is at hand because we are committing national suicide with this insanity.

Tucker [01:17:51] I wish I could disagree. It’s one of the saddest things I’ve ever seen. I wish

Brandon Weichert [01:17:55] I wish I didn’t have to say these things. I don’t think that you’re-

Tucker [01:17:57] I don’t think I totally totally agree and you think of the men whose Lives are gonna be taken Americans who are like the best people already have been Already have been and you look at I think the DOD is only released the hometowns of four of them I think but it’s like Iowa a couple from I it’s the oh, yeah the best

Brandon Weichert [01:18:14] These are our people.

Tucker [01:18:15] No private equity kids in that group. I know that’s right. That’s right, and I just.

Brandon Weichert [01:18:19] I just want to just say something, and I probably shouldn’t, but I was, as I said, a very early supporter of Hegseth as Secretary of Defense. I thought his takes on hypersonics were good. I thought that he was a war fighter, so he understood in a way that maybe you and I could never understand. But I was mortified by his press conference this morning, the glibness, six Americans are dead because of a political decision that was made. Obviously, I don’t expect him to challenge the president on this publicly. But at the very least it’s a solemn day and we should probably not be acting like this is just another walk in the park because this is not this is no this is now going to plan them hopefully we can pull it out of the fire whatever that looks like but right now this is a not going the way we were told it was going to go and certainly not the way the president assumed it would go once he wants well come on he was whacked

Tucker [01:19:12] So the question, I think, is do we commit ground troops? Americans on the ground? They already are. OK, so explain what you know, if you don’t mind.

Brandon Weichert [01:19:22] So it’s just, again, I don’t have any, but just for the record, because I know I’m going to, I have no access to classified information, right? I am an open source guy. But I can read a freaking room. And I can tell you right now, if the president went into this air war thinking I’m gonna be over in three or four days, I’m not to worry about the stockpiles. And now he’s waking up and going, Holy cow, everything’s running out and I got to keep fighting. He’s talking about now opening up a front in Iraq using the Kurds, which is lunacy. What are the Turks going to do?

Tucker [01:19:51] Well, by the way, the point is, because Israel’s next priority is Turkey, so the point is to diminish Turkey. Yeah, yeah, Michael Rubin’s been writing that. I know all about that. It’s the truest, yeah.

Brandon Weichert [01:20:01] Yeah and uh… Yeah and so there’s that and then there’s the fact that the president wants to be seen as quote unquote winning and winning means you’ve got he’s already outlined what the objectives are in this was this was also a big bugaboo of mine war and strategy is about objectives attainable political objectives clouswood’s wars an extension uh… Politics through other means Trump came out on Saturday. He’s repeated it since The aims are regime change, the aims are denuclearization, and the aims are getting rid of the ballistic missile system. He’s now added on getting rid the Navy, if you’re wrong. So those four objectives. What is the objective of the Iranian regime? Survive. That’s all they have to do. Survive long enough because they know because the Chinese and Russians are giving them the intel, they know that our stockpiles are about to be depleted. So all they have to is hold out until we have to start cannibalizing Indopaycom. And there’s going to be a real political fight at that point. I’m told that Indopacom leaders are already raising quite a stink behind the scenes because they know once those systems are gone out of their arsenal, they ain’t coming back anytime soon. So the question of ground troops, this gets us to that. I don’t believe it would ever be an invasion like Iraq in 03. First of all, we don’t have that capability anymore, which should scare every American because we don’t have that capablity anymore. Second of all the way the country is arrayed, Trump is trying to do this in like a light footprint methodology. So he I think is gonna replicate the US strategy in Afghanistan in 2001 where we sent a bunch of Special Forces A teams and CIA paramilitaries Infiltrated the country linked up with already organized locals. It was the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan this time It’ll probably be the Mujahideen II call me Kay To try to basically organize a movement with the Kurds coming in probably from the Iraqi side In the I think it’s the north. I think is the northwest of the country and will be coming in from the south and it will kind of link up in whatever’s left of Tehran. That’s the plan, I think, using air power as an interdiction like we did, exactly like we did against the Taliban in 2001. Well, first of all, the MEK is not the Northern Alliance at its height, it’s not. Second of all you’re talking about far greater ground that’s going to have to be covered and a logistics tale that is going, I mean we’re talking like this is not gonna work. Then you’re gonna have to deal with the rugged terrain of iran iran is basically like switzerland it’s just surrounded by mountains it’s a desert in the middle i mean this is not good geography for the kind of tactics were talking about uh… And again the size matters this is a much bigger country than afghanistan with many more people uh… So we’re talking about a much longer and uh… Commitment on our part and i think the president knows this and i thank he’s sort of like the frog boiling the water boiling in the water, he’s just sort of slowly. Getting us used to the idea before he has to send troops in because he wants to quote win And well winning for him is regime change. The regime is not going to change on its own It’s not going be the people who can do it because they’re not organized enough. They’re two divided amongst each other so he’s going to need to send in special forces and cia to basically do the organizing on the ground and to do force multipliers and uh I’m sorry to say that the likelihood of this working is very very low and now we’re talking about being seen in this region as strategically defeated by what we were told was a backward military force in Iran.

Tucker [01:23:44] The first American to die in the war in Afghanistan was a CIA officer, Johnny Michael Spann.

Brandon Weichert [01:23:48] Yes, right. That’s right. Yeah.

Tucker [01:23:52] These forces, the CIA paramilitaries, special forces, would be deployed to do what? The goal is what?

Brandon Weichert [01:24:02] Well, it’s exactly what well again the the goal that we are told and that Trump continues to say is regime change regime change We don’t want the Islamic Republic of Iran in charge anymore We want I don’t know me K or the Shah’s son who’s a lobbyist in Northern, Virginia I’m sure he’ll do great or you know any of these other you know groups The thing is we don’t really know and I think it’s very interesting that we

Tucker [01:24:28] Can I just ask, is the problem, I mean, I do detect, I don’t detect, I notice, it’s very obvious, efforts by Israel and its proxies in the United States to foment a religious conflict in our country. Hate all the Muslims, deport the Muslims as if that’s better than saying hate all the Jews. It’s not better. It’s the same thing. But they’re trying to turn religions against each other in our country. And I see the same, at which I resent more than anything I’ve seen in a long time, because it’s not going to make a peaceful country for my children. But I see that in this effort. So the idea is like they’re not allowed to have an Islamic country or something? Half our allies are Islamic countries. What kind of country are we calling for? It’s their country, no? Where

Brandon Weichert [01:25:12] Let me just clarify, I was just using the official name of the, I don’t know if this, I’m sure for some people it is, but they just want to replace it with anyone other than the current crop of leaders. And I believe that that is not possible because this regime is deeply embedded. So, you know, we killed Kimani and a dozen new leaders replaced all of these other leaders. This is, this reminded me a lot of the early days of the Ukraine war, when the Ukrainians and the NATO types would be, Oh, we killed this Russian commander. We got this guy. Well, within 24 to 48 hours, the leadership was replaced and the Russians kept going. So this is, you know, who knew a nation of 96 million people would find other generals and people to promote, you know, you know, you know.

Tucker [01:26:00] Well also you wonder like how much if you really believe that killing an eighty six-year-old cleric is going to topple the government how much do you know about the country and how much of what you think you know. Well that’s my point. It’s filtered through some CIA source who wants to be president like the former king’s son. Exactly. Do we know a lot about Iran? I don’t sense that we do.

Brandon Weichert [01:26:22] Well i i know a lot about iran but you know i was boxed out of the administration almost from the beginning so it’s like why and people like uh… I think well i think there’s some personnel in the white house that doesn’t like me and i and i think that they don’t like that i don’t play ball and you know why moved i got out of dc moved to florida and i’d never look back but uh… There are people like me as well who were boxed at who know a lot of out these things and we’re not Okay.

Tucker [01:26:47] And we are not talking. Can I ask you who, if you can say who, because you’re clearly very knowledgeable, you seem sensible, you seem pro-American.

Brandon Weichert [01:26:55] I’m going to tell you i’ll tell you offline i really don’t like really not looking to start a picture reading i understand

Tucker [01:27:01] I understand. So let me ask you a broader question, which is, and I know the answer, but I won’t hear you say it. Was there from the very beginning of this second Trump term an effort to exclude anybody who might conceivably stand in the way of an Iran invasion?

Brandon Weichert [01:27:19] Even though I again again understand I I hate the regime, you know, I don’t like that regime I’m just not like i’m some lover of you know But I I was I was a friend of mine joked. I wasn’t sufficiently on board With this program

Tucker [01:27:33] there is a ron invasion program on work as a

Brandon Weichert [01:27:36] run war because i think it’s this is the stuff of of lunacy and this is literally this is like the mad king you know this is this this doesn’t make any this doesn’t make any sense yeah it doesn’t unless you know what you were saying in your monolog which i think you’re probably right i think that’s definitely at play here

Tucker [01:27:52] Yeah, I mean, I just want to be clear. I don’t think that most U.S. Policymakers have any idea what the foundation stone is, or Al-Aqsa, or Dome of the Rock, or the Third Temple. This is just so far from the concerns of average people in this country, even our policymakers. Their minders are not paying.

Brandon Weichert [01:28:04] Their minders are not paying them to know their minders or not.

Tucker [01:28:08] Well, that’s it, but there are people who do know, and certainly in the region, in the Middle East and the rest of the world, people are religious. They’re not Americans. Like, they care. So these are big questions to people around the world. Just not.

Brandon Weichert [01:28:20] I will I care these I’m a Christian and well I care too

Tucker [01:28:24] Let me ask you, since you said that you’re constructing most of your analyzes through open source materials, you’re reading publicly available things on the internet, have you noticed an effort to clamp down on videos? Okay, tell us what you’ve noticed.

Brandon Weichert [01:28:39] There’s also an interesting effort Tucker to, and I think this is coming from our guys to spread AI videos of what looked like war scenes and then you share it. And then they say, ah, that’s AI. We got to get him dinged now. We gotta get him D. You know, this is all, you know, we have, it is a, um, Tucker, it is the hay sad day in this country when we have official and I, and I have a feeling I know the group that’s doing it. We have official U.S. Intelligence people being paid with our tax dollars to sit around a basement in Langley or Arlington, Virginia, and harass American citizens online for sharing their opinion. But that is where we are at in this country. That is where are at. And I can tell you right now, I have been the victim of bot attacks. I’ve been the victims of cyber attacks in the last 24 hours on my personal email, which I didn’t know people had, but apparently they do. Uh… We have been i had to file a police report in fact yesterday with my local police uh… On this ever since coming out the last weekend and sharing my my opinion uh… And this is not an organic phenomenon this is either ars or israel or the british uh… You know cuz they’re always in there somehow

Tucker [01:29:56] Or the French, that’s right.

Brandon Weichert [01:29:57] Or the French, that’s right, that right. So this is, you know, this is where we are. This isn’t really America anymore. This is some censorious state. And I thought that we were gonna be cleaning that up, but we’re instead, we’re Instead giving the keys to these guys and telling them to go start World War III.

Tucker [01:30:15] I wonder if we’re gonna see, this is purely speculative, but wars tend to create an environment where there’s actual persecution of critics of the war.

Brandon Weichert [01:30:27] Well, I was told, and again, take from this what you will, because I have no way of proving it. I was two years ago that the Biden regime had concocted a list of high-profile MAGA supporters that they were gonna basically go to and say, if Kamala had won, say that, hey, you gotta leave the country as, you know, you gotta get out or we’re gonna basically prosecute you until you’re broke in lawfare. And thank God that never happened, but those lists are still around. And uh… You know in thirty five months we have an election coming up and if this keeps going the way it is uh… Tucker i don’t think the republicans stand a chance to to win the next election of things keep going the where they are

Tucker [01:31:09] Last question. I don’t care if it’s JD or if it is Marco. Yeah, well, I unfortunately agree with you. Last question, and I hope you’ll come back, because I think this has been so smart and knowledgeable. Anytime you need me, I live near you, apparently. Thank you. So, here’s my question. I saw a video, maybe AI, of the governor of California today, Gavin Newsom, saying point blank, Israel led us into this war, Israel leads us around by the nose, Israel’s genocide in Gaza. And we can’t we’re not getting anything out of this and we need to reassess our military support for israel

Brandon Weichert [01:31:45] Yeah, that’s probably your next president right there

Tucker [01:31:47] Well, and I know him and I wouldn’t credit a single word he says with sincerity, he doesn’t believe anything. But he’s smart. And I know that Donald Trump thinks he’s formidable. He has said that in public a lot. I mean, if that’s real, then I mean that guy has a shot. Do you think?

Brandon Weichert [01:32:06] Yeah, I think I wouldn’t be surprised. Look, this can all be right. I just want to make it clear This can be reversed in the next 48 hours of Trump. Thank you clears victory Thank you and just gets out and says look I got everybody we needed to get if the people of Iran can’t do it Then they’re never going to do it. You know, this is this is it’s it’s an easy out It’s a golden off-ramp. Mr. President. It’s golden off ramp with your name on it

Tucker [01:32:25] Take it and you’ll be a hero. Can Israel, will Israel allow that?

Brandon Weichert [01:32:30] Uh… You know i i don’t i probably though that they will probably try something but uh… You know height all i can i can’t dictate what’s gonna israel’s gonna do i can say is the president’s gotta make it clear he’s getting out now we’ve achieved our objectives were done where that’s what he needs to do uh… In terms of uh… It terms of news them you know either i he he will probably be the nominee because he is wiley enough I kind of reminds me of Bill Clinton a little bit in a weird way. Oh, yeah. But I wouldn’t be surprised if his V is in my old state where I used to live. Virginia is Abigail Spanberger because the CIA wants to have one of their own sitting in the white house.

Tucker [01:33:12] Man, that’s not democracy. That’s really, really dark. I hope you’re wrong.

Brandon Weichert [01:33:15] Nah, it’s a deep state, man, and we’re supposed to just, man-

Tucker [01:33:18] Brandon Weichert, that was great. And thank you so much for doing this. I’ll see you again. Thank you so for having me. Great to meet you. Thanks. And thank for joining us. We’ll be back next Wednesday. Thanks for watching the Wednesday edition of the show. We stream live every week, Wednesday 6 p.m. Eastern on tuckercarlson.com. Members can watch the show live, join the members only chat, and take part in the conversation in real time. We’re grateful to be doing it and grateful that you watch it.