Alexander Dugin: The Axes of the Third World War
The Netanyahu/Trump pole is most of all focused on Iran. If Iran were to fall, they would most likely turn their attention to supporting Ukraine and targeting Russia. But Iran’s desperate resistance is diverting their main attention. Right now, Russia is not their priority — Iran is. Of course, Trump no longer cares at all about “peacekeeping,” so any settlement with Russia, if it has any meaning, is purely pragmatic. His war is the war with Iran. Israel has made this war Trump’s war. And Trump is not backing away from it.
Thus, one axis has been formed: the US/Israel against Iran. Other regional powers are being offered a choice — and it is a harsh one: either join the American-Israeli coalition or join Iran (the Resistance). No intermediate position is envisaged, and if anyone tries to insist on neutrality, they will be bombed and attacked from both sides. There is no neutrality here. The train has left the station.
The second axis: the EU/Britain/globalists in the US (primarily the Democratic Party) against Russia and in support of the Kyiv regime. This is a very real and ferocious war, for which the majority of European countries (with the exception of Hungary and Slovakia) are preparing for direct participation. The Democratic Party in the US is promoting precisely this war; for this pole, Ukraine is the priority.
The main goal of both poles is to drive a wedge between Iran and Russia so that they do not notice that they are fighting the same enemy. And the main complaint of the US and Israel toward the EU and the globalists, as well as the main complaint of the EU and the globalists toward the US and Israel, is precisely that they are waging two wars against two opponents of Epstein’s civilization at the same time, rather than one after the other.
Since the war with Iran is dragging on, Israel is gradually turning into Gaza, and the world economy is about to collapse due to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz (energy lockdowns have already been introduced in some countries), the globalists have turned against Trump, who, in their view, is “betraying Ukraine” and diverting attention from the main enemy — Russia. This line is being pumped up by Soros’s networks, which generally hate Trump and Netanyahu. But the following must be kept in mind: those who attack Trump and Israel most fiercely for the war with Iran are not against war in general, but for war with Russia. Almost all the European forces and entire countries that have piled on Netanyahu are simply demanding a shift in priorities in favor of Zelensky’s regime. In the US, the Democrats are screaming about this at the top of their lungs.
Iran and Russia perfectly understand that the issue is not who in the West is for war and who is against it, but on whom the West wants to concentrate first. This only means that they will concentrate on the other later. No one harbors any illusions. And of course, Russia and Iran are fighting on the same side and against the same enemy. Any surface-level actions do not change the essence of the Third World War. The fog of war. Negotiations. Distractions. Smoke and mirrors.
The main thing now is not to let the enemy — the collective West, Epstein’s civilization — defeat us one by one. We must enter the war as soon as possible and as radically as possible. Support friends and allies, convince the wavering, and bring society to a state of emergency.
A very vivid example is Iran’s information war, which they are winning brilliantly. This is simply an observation.
A great deal depends on China. So far it is waiting, but it has already unleashed its latest psychological weapon — Professor Jiang Xueqin. He is attacking the consciousness of global analysts with his predictions. Not bad at all. For the first time, Chinese intellectuals have begun talking about the Zionist conspiracy, eschatology, Sabbatai Zevi, Jacob Frank, the Illuminati, grand geopolitics, and global capitalist elites. China’s strategic thinking is coming into focus. No more “win-win” or panda strategies. Things are being called by their real names.
Beijing will strike at Taiwan, but it is unclear when. If it waits until other forces of multipolarity are weakened or, God forbid, fall, China will not stand alone. Therefore, it is better to strike right now, opening a third front. Against the very same enemy. Strictly and directly the same one.
Right now the enemy is preparing, but is not yet ready to wage three wars simultaneously. And if someone else from the multipolar world opens an additional front, the enemy’s forces will be spread across the entire planet. It is high time to begin a global planetary uprising against the dictatorship of Baal. He has exposed himself sufficiently.
It is no coincidence that Peter Thiel, who brought Trump to power, is traveling the world giving lectures about the Antichrist. Everyone has seen the true face of the West — it is Epstein. It is the murdered Iranian schoolgirls, it is the tens of thousands of infants in Gaza. No one can say: “I didn’t know, I didn’t see, I wasn’t aware.” That excuse no longer works. Everyone has seen and everyone knows, and if they are still not fighting on our side of the front, then in essence they are on the side of the enemy. And they become legitimate targets.
Latin America currently looks like the obviously weak link. The shameful surrender of the ideas of the Revolution and Chávez’s legacy by the pathetic cowards in the Venezuelan government is depressing. No one will name their daughters “Delcy” for centuries to come. The surname “Rodríguez” has also been badly damaged. Lula and Brazil, as well as Mexico and Colombia, are doing something to help Cuba, but they do not dare directly challenge the United States. They are afraid. But there is no point in being afraid anymore — it’s too late.
In Africa there are brilliant heroes in the form of the countries of the Sahel Association (Burkina Faso, Niger, Mali), proud Ethiopia, and several other regimes that have not bowed before the civilization of Baal (CAR, partly South Africa). This inspires cautious optimism.
The Sunni Islamic world is divided, its upper echelons are corrupt and integrated into the Epstein archipelago, the masses are corrupted by idiotic Salafism and Wahhabism, which make Muslims pour out their anger on the innocent and defend the interests of the US and Israel. A relatively sovereign position is held by Pakistan (though it has its own war with the Taliban-Pashtuns) and Indonesia. As for the Zionists, Erdoğan is next in line for elimination, but he will waver (as usual).
India, being a pillar of multipolarity and a State-Civilization, finds itself in a difficult position. New Delhi sees China as its main regional rival, and Modi and the surrounding Hindutva regard Islam with great suspicion. This pushes India toward an alliance with the US and Israel, although a more active policy on this side of the front is hardly to be expected.
North Korea looks like the most adequate country, and Japan the most inadequate.
The Third World War is being waged between those who want to preserve and strengthen the hegemony of the collective West at any cost (both in its wild-Trumpist, Zionist version and in the globalist Euro-model), and multipolar humanity — that is, us. It is already underway. In full swing.
Of course, one can continue to pretend that nothing of the sort is happening. But why?
Let’s use any language we possibly can to never mention the root cause of this all. Instead use terms such as ‘the collective West’ or ‘Epstein’s civilisation’. This is dishonest use of language.
Dugin is not alone – the entire Russian establishment seems hell-bent on never quite mentioning the truth about the real power in the West while doing everything they can to gloss over the real atrocities committed before, during and after WWII which were largely Soviet – yet interestingly the power behind ‘the collective West’ now is the same one that drove the Soviet Union to mass murder and other countless atrocities while using the word ‘Nazi’ as many times as possible.
This is why I dislike the Russian government/establishment and I do not trust them. I particularly dislike the pseudo-intellectual and dishonest Dugin whose writings leave me with the same sensation one gets when in a public building and on opening a door you realise that there was a greasy residue on the door handle.
Commenter Anonymous00: “I know of your past fondness for the German varietals, but I can wholeheartedly endorse the new breed of Austrians. Glock .34 and .26” -The Sommelier.
https://www.amren.com/podcasts/2026/03/the-astonishing-assault-on-glock/?ht-comment-id=33214993
The irony of this nonsensical quote is that Glock itself is actually headquartered in a town called Deutsch-Wagram. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsch-Wagram
The following is the translated content from a 10-year-old video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQX-HVSOOtE
Video Greeting and Thesis
Greetings, my name is Nikolai Alexander. Today, we’re tackling a fundamental topic: Austrian identity. As we all know, Austria is some foreign country that has basically nothing to do with Germany. Austrians are a completely alien people to us, and the differences between our two totally distinct nations are so vast that no one wants anything to do with their insufferable neighbor—and it’s mutual. But something interesting caught my eye: my stats show the second-highest number of views come from Austria. That’s odd—my videos are about Germany, yet Austrians are watching in droves, even though they claim to have nothing to do with us. And here’s another curiosity: this totally foreign people speaks our language—German. How is that possible? Plus, why is Austria even called Austria? Originally, this part of Europe was “Ostarici,” meaning “Eastern Mark” or eastern border region. Why would an independent country call itself an “eastern border region” of itself? The same goes for Ukraine—it claims to be a sovereign state with its own people but calls itself “Ukraine,” meaning “borderland,” so it’s apparently the borderland of itself, just like Austria.
Historical Commonality
All these observations contradict the claim that Austrians are a separate people—and the reason is simple: that claim is utter nonsense. Austrians are Germans, and I’ll prove it now. Austria is called Austria because it was the Ostmark, the eastern border region of the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation. The Ostmark was first documented in 996, and the Empire lasted until 1806—that’s over 800 years of shared history our ethnologists conveniently sweep under the rug. You could even add centuries before the Empire’s revival, but 800 years suffice to debunk the separatists. During those 800 years, Austria was the Empire’s most powerful force: Vienna was the imperial capital, and the Habsburgs provided emperors for centuries. After Napoleon dissolved the Empire in 1806 and was defeated in 1815, the German Confederation formed (lasting until 1866), with Austria as a member—another 51 years of shared history, overshadowed by German dualism and culminating in the German War, where Austria led the Confederation against Prussia.
19th-20th Century Divergence and Wars
The North German Confederation and the German Empire’s founding in 1871 (the “small German solution”) split us legally, but by 1879 we were allies again, fighting and falling together in World War I. Here’s the key point we’ve discussed before: post-WWI, Austria-Hungary—a massive multi-ethnic empire—was dismantled. All ethnic groups got self-determination except one: the Germans. Sudeten Germans were forced into Czechoslovakia, South Tyroleans into Italy, and the remaining German-Austrians into a tiny rump state. They overwhelmingly wanted to join the German Reich, and this rump was called “German-Austria” because it was the German part of old Austria. That was a silver lining in disaster—the war’s defeat shattered Austria-Hungary and ended German dualism, paving the way for unity. But the victors knew a fragmented Germany was easier to manipulate than a united one, so they kept us apart. For centuries, Austrians saw themselves as Germans without question—the only debate was who should lead Germany.
Anschluss and Postwar “Re-education”
Twenty years later, the attempt was made to unite what belongs together: Austria was annexed to Germany against its government’s will but with the Austrian people’s explicit approval—and the world’s, including the Western Allies’. After WWII’s loss, Austrians suddenly developed amnesia, claiming no ties to the “aggressive northern people” that “invaded” them. Austria was detached again, along with South Tyrol and the Sudetenland. Allied re-education began: Austrians were told they’re not German; Germans were told unity is sinful. A prime example is Austrian cookbook author Katharina Prato’s 1858 book The South German Kitchen (logical—Austria as South Germany, like Schleswig as North Germany). Postwar, it became The Good Old Kitchen—no more “South German.” Despite this, evidence of Austrian German identity persists: official maps labeling Austrians as Germans, and towns like Bad Deutsch-Altenburg, Deutsch-Brodersdorf, Deutsch-Goritz (Styria), Deutsch-Griffen (Carinthia), Deutsch-Jahndorf (Burgenland), Deutsch-Kaltenbrunn (Burgenland), Deutsch-Schützen (Burgenland), Deutsch-Wagram (Lower Austria), Deutsch-Feistritz (Styria), Deutsch-Kreuz (Burgenland), and Deutschlandsberg (Styria). That’s a lot of “German” towns for a country with “nothing to do with Germany.”
Call to Unity
Dear German-Austrians, you’ve been lied to with malicious brainwashing—not as severe as ours in Germany, but enough for a false self-image designed to divide us and harm you. If you resent German tourists, drivers, or students, you’re off-base—complain about Bavarians, Lower Saxons, or Prussians if you like, but not Germans, because you are Germans. For Germans in the Federal Republic, this is easier to accept than for Austrian-Germans, who’ve been fed fears that Germany wants to erase their Austrian identity (e.g., turning them into Prussians). No one’s saying that—Bayern are Bavarians and Germans; Austrians are Austrians and Germans. Germany’s motto isn’t “e pluribus unum” melting tribes into mush; it’s EU-style “united in diversity.” Many German tribes, each with traits and place, under one roof: Germany. That’s how we resist oppression. But they’ve driven a wedge. Some will cling to denial despite facts, rejecting “Piefkes” (derogatory for Germans). But I’m no Piefke—born in Bavaria, grandparents from western Sudetenland. Am I Bavarian? Nonsense. I’m Sudeten-German, thus Austrian-German. I know what I speak of. Nothing’s being taken; your stolen true identity is returned.
Countering the Hitler Objection
A major brainwashed counterargument: “Hitler annexed Austria in 1938, so that idea’s invalid—don’t even voice it.” If Churchill, Roosevelt, or China’s emperor had done it, opinions might differ, but Hitler’s unpopularity poisons it (argumentum ad hominem + ad populum—unscientific, dishonest). Science agrees: it’s no real argument. Thought experiment: If communists had seized power pre-1933 (they tried) and annexed Austria (logical next step for world revolution, with Austrian majority support), would it be taboo today? No—judgments are moral taboos, not objective, stifling truth via silence spirals: undemocratic filth. No objective bar to annexation exists (maybe sovereignty loss, but Austria’s already follows Germany/EU/Washington—no real sovereignty left). Austria’s declining like core Germany, just slower, with more common sense/resistance. I get resisting “horror-republic” Berlin, but reverse it: annex Germany to Austria, make Vienna capital—whatever unites what belongs together. Do you value 900+ years history or 70 years brainwashing? Unity’s impossible now, but future upheavals will offer chances. Until then, remember who we are. Let’s part ways.
Alexander Dugin has advocated a civil war to destroy the USA by using the blacks against whites.
He is a crank, but a dangerous one, whereas Trump is a child and also dangerous.
The one man who knows what he is doing and is biding his time is Xi.