New primate discovered: The Archbishopess of Canterbury
The 400-pound corpse of Henry VIII turned in its grave last week, following the enthronement of Sarah Mullally as Archbishop of Canterbury. The pro-LGBT feminist and mother of two will serve as the Primate of All England (official title) and is a fitting appointment for the woke joke that is the Church of England [CofE] in its modern incarnation. If this is the triumph of progress and history-making, then it is merely at the self-fulfilling indulgence of those who invert and pervert history and tradition. As an old Polish proverb goes, where the devil cannot go himself, he sends a woman.

Sarah Mullally
For those who missed the two-hour ceremony at Canterbury Cathedral, the event could be more or less described as a vacuous, corporatized and avant-garde aberration that was completely out of place in the majestic thousand-year-old edifice. Midway through the program, an African troupe of singers and dancers joined the proceedings with their customary singing and dancing — including women with unshaved armpits. This was followed by various addresses in Spanish, Urdu and Bemba, because in spite of its appellation, the Church of England is entirely globalist in domain and doctrine. Various other faith leaders were in attendance, but why wouldn’t there be a bit of solidarity among those who trade in verbal diarrhea and an invisible product?
Even more surprising than the abundance of ethno-diversity on display was the overrepresentation of women, especially at the top. Women were only able to be ordained in 1994 and become bishops in 2014, yet they now make up one-third of all bishops. Under the matronage of Archbishop Sarah Mullally there can be little doubt that the CofE, as Church of Equity, will pursue ever more inclusivity inspired quotas for more highly ranked women and ultimately decommission God’s male identity. There’s virtually no sense of mystique and sublimity left in this house of God, instead it comes across as a civilian parade of part-timers who, motivated by a sense of self-importance and charmed by ceremonial garb, want to merchandise their side hustle to higher social status but lack the sort of sacrifice and commitment that is required of real priests.
At a time when most religions are suffering a legitimacy crisis, the Anglican strategy of submitting to modern pressures and political fashions is certainly a bold one. Besides the cultural Marxism and woke environmental initiatives, the church was in lockstep adherence to COVID-19-prescribed tyranny, such that all places of worship were closed to the public for months. On the Brexit referendum, only one of 116 bishops dared to support the Leave Campaign, which was an extremity of groupthink discordant with two-thirds of Anglican voters and even Queen Elizabeth II. Succeeding the queen in the role as nominal head of the Anglican Church is King Charles III, a man who will not send out an Easter message to Christians but does congratulate Muslims for Ramadan.
Like Islam, Anglicanism is a political religion but it’s obviously not the right one because its numbers continue to dwindle. So what exactly have senior leaders devised for community outreach and winning back the flock? In 2016, the Bishop of London suggested that vicars grow beards because that was an “icebreaker” that could better engage Muslims. In 2019, a drive presumably aimed at chavs saw the 900-year-old Rochester Cathedral host a nine-hole “crazy golf” course beneath its arches.

In order to better understand the thinking of the Church of England’s top brass it may help to take a closer look at the biographical details of the freshly minted Archbishop of Canterbury. Dame Sarah Mullally was born in 1962, in the auspiciously named town of Woking, Surrey. Her educational background, as well as statements on “not wanting to be a doctor” fit the profile of an ambitious and overeducated nurse who lacked true intellect but had desires for prestige and social climbing. Mullally therefore sought advancement by entering the managerial class. In 1999, she became Chief Nursing Officer for England in the National Health Service and in 2005 was knighted (made a Dame). With this distinction, one may think she must have eclipsed Florence Nightingale and invented a new type of nursing while volunteering in Calcutta or Kinshasa, alas, as with many of these modern accolades the generic “contributions to the field of …” suffices.
With regard to her convictions and character, it is enough to see that even as a senior figure within the church Mullally has provided mealy-mouthed avowals on matters that should be central to Christian teaching. Besides same-sex marriage, the former nurse is also supportive of abortion. At a meeting of the Anglican Synod last year, Mullally broke down into tears because of the “micro-aggressions” and “institutional barriers” faced by women. This coming from a woman who has reached the apex of two unrelated fields and received honorary doctorates from five universities.
But if we leave The Most Reverend and Right Honorable Mullally on her personal Golgotha and return to Tudor England, a searing irony becomes apparent in the Church of England’s early genesis. The whole point of Henry VIII’s insistence on the right to divorce and remarry was because of his need for a son. And the reason he insisted on a male heir was because he deemed women completely unsuited to positions of leadership. Thus, the long arc of history has proved Henry VIII right for his views but wrong for his actions. In his defense, it could be said that the emerging Renaissance period on the continent was already paving the way for the spiritual emancipation and semi-deification of women.
Europe’s egalitarian spirit and liberal tradition have without doubt guided Christianity away from Semitic patriarchalism and introduced such tendencies as the de facto worship of Mary as an idol. It’s also thanks to Rome and Constantinople that Mary Magdalene, commonly presumed to have been a prostitute, is nevertheless the object of veneration and occasional adoration. If it wasn’t so, then millions of new parents across Europe and Latin America would not bestow the name of a biblical whore to their newborn daughters.
By some contrast, it may surprise most Christians in the West to learn that in the Levantine homeland of their faith — be it Palestine, Lebanon, Egypt or Iraq — churches are still gender-segregated, with men going on one side and women on the other. Synagogues adhere to this custom too, with only some Reform and Reconstructionist synagogues opting to remove the mechitza (barrier). Islam, of course, takes things to another level, quite literally, as women are only permitted in the upper gallery, which is more of an observation deck.
This illustrates the influence that culture and race can have on religion — the modern English form being no exception (if it can even be called a religion). The CofE is now more of a vestigial faith and secular cult — in sync with the establishment zeitgeist. In past centuries, the Church of England was an institutional force influencing society in a very different direction, and in some ways more conservative than the Catholic Church. Charles Darwin, for example, was attacked exclusively by clergy from the Church of England.
Looking at the current state of England, it doesn’t take a naturalist like Jane Goodall, who died last year, or David Attenborough, who turns 100 next month, to understand the simian-like group conflict transpiring on the ground. This includes never before seen social maladies like so-called flash mobs of “feral youth” and daylight smash-and-grab robberies. Users on social media have pointed out that authorities across the country have begun erecting anti-pooping signage in all kinds of public places. Just last week, Professor David Betz of King’s College London, warned the European Parliament that Britain was not far away from civil war. On whose side the Mullally-led Church of England would align is anyone’s guess.





No “Church”
No “England”
The author collapses several separate traditions into one muddled claim. First, Mary Magdalene is never described in the Gospels as a prostitute. She is introduced as a follower of Jesus “from whom seven demons had gone out,” and later as the first witness to the Resurrection — a position of honour, not disgrace. The idea that she was a repentant sex worker comes from later Western preaching, especially a conflation by Pope Gregory I in 591, who merged her with two different unnamed women: the “sinful woman” who anoints Jesus’ feet in Luke 7, and Mary of Bethany, sister of Lazarus. These are distinct individuals in the text itself.
One religion only seems to escape scorn on this site.
Are you funded by Qatar?
Mary Magdalene had been mentally ill. The sex aspect comes in with later Jewish, Christian and Fake-History speculation, which makes her an affectionate follower and/or wife of the charismatic guru with the usual female groupies. The poignant scene in the 4th Gospel when the risen Lord (without his burial wrapping) and Mary of Magdala meet is a particularly dramatic touch in what is basically a brilliantly composed play. I reject the assertion that Jesus was a COMPLETELY mythical person, which contradicts common-sense and careful scholarly analysis.
I’m a “leading edge” Boomer who was baptized into the Anglican Communion. Several years ago I got up and walked out. Among the reasons for my exit was the female priests. They seem to come in three varieties:
1) The shallow, smiley-faced, happy camper, sing-along leader;
2) The frustrated Druid who seemingly would rather be conducting services in the woods under the sacred oak and who totally ignores the Book of Common Prayer;
3) The uber-militant feminist who does not shiv-a-git about Christianity other than as a means to a political end.
Fabulously mocking essay, though it cannot comfort over
the scandalous occasion (which isn’t it intention anyway).
I see https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/gdzie_diabe%C5%82_nie_mo%C5%BCe,_tam_bab%C4%99_po%C5%9Ble
Incidentally, the “Polish” proverb also exists in Ger-
man (Wo der Teufel nicht selbst hin will, schickt er
ein Weib), first documented by Ludwig Tieck, “who-
se anti-Semitism” —just imagine that—“is expressed
in his vehement rejection of Jewish emancipation.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_Tieck
Perhaps the Poles—as they do with anything that
isn’t riveted and nailed down—have simply appro-
priated this saying without attributing it to anyone.
Another Polish saying goes, as one reads: “The
Jew deceives the German, the Devil deceives the
Jew, the Ruthenian deceives the Devil, and the wo-
man deceives the Ruthenian.” (Żyd okpi Niemca, dia-
beł Żyda, Rusin diabła, a Rusina niewiasta.) It’s time
to “deceive back” the Jews on an international scale.
A woman on the Ruthenian church, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/ruthenian-catholic-church
Hollycaust https://linkmix.co/53020763
Collecting Easter eggs in the woods during a storm.
Only women could come up with such logical ideas.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/satrupholm-easter-egg-hunt-deaths-36971841
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_a_tree_falls_in_a_forest_and_no_one_is_around_to_hear_it%2C_does_it_make_a_sound%3F
“In early May 1945 Heinrich Himmler, former Reichs-
führer-SS, stayed in a farm near the village for several
days while attempting to avoid capture by the Allies.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satrup
Sarah Mullally’s appointment as Archbishopess of Canterbury is a logical sequel to the feminization of Western societies—quite in line with the more secular vulvocratic appointments of the EU Commission. The overall spirit of LGBT intellectual menopause in the West has spread everywhere, from the ex-PM in Finland to the ex-PM down under in New Zealand.No reason to fret. After all, Jesus, the first Bolshevik of Antiquity, was venerated mostly by women of dubious past. Another way of explaining Mullally’s and Co.’s new political/theological ectasis is the way the French say it suc-cinctly: she (or they) isn’t getting laid enough (“Elle est mal baisée”).
“Vulvocratic”, wonderful. The world viewed from a strictly vaginal perspective (and forced upon the rest of humanity). Things are finally getting better. Good, better, bestial.
“Quantum of No‑Response”
He sat at his desk, precise and neat,
A monument of calm and seat.
Into his doorway, softly crept
A whisper, “Peek‑a‑boo!”—then, lept.
He flinched not; his pen still rolled,
While Minnie slippers, pink and bold,
Announced a presence—warm, bare‑skinned,
Who posed as if audition‑pinned.
She twirled, “Guess what I came to seek?”
He sighed, “A PhD in Greek?”
She pouted, straddling office space,
He met her eyes—but not her face.
Her breath was champagne, breaking law,
Her tactics worthy of applause—
Except his pulse, unmoved, at ease,
Performed strict academic freeze.
“Nothing?” she gasped. “Not even twitch?”
He said, “Perhaps you flipped the switch.”
She fumed, “I BESIT you, hear?”
He smiled, “Then sit—just park it here.”
Minutes passed; her pride wore thin.
His patience thickened, zen within.
Then—bored—she grabbed his open text,
And read: “Quantum fields”… perplexed.
He looked, at last—his gaze alive:
“Now THAT’S how particles survive.”
Her cheeks went red; she lost her claim—
The body’s war had blown its flame.
He sipped his tea, composed, complete.
She murmured, “You’re annoyingly neat.”
Outside, spring hummed its neutral song—
Desire misfired. Thought turned on.
She spreads her labia: “Look at it closely,
breathe in its scent: moist salmon folds,
garnished with curly angel hair – rosy
innocence! You like that, don’t you?
You can’t turn down this offer!
[…]
You’re resisting? Without me, you’re just
a remote-controlled set of underpants!
The other men—the real, strong ones—
will all have me, and you’ll have to watch
helplessly because you’ve lost me!”
The so-called battle of the sexes has always interested me. Why is it enough for women to have a vulva to control men? The final line of Goethe’s Faust reads: “And eternally the feminine draws us on high.” This can only have something to do with the urge to procreate in a general sense, because otherwise we would all be sperm donors.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_feminine
Why do even billionaires let women fleece them, take them for a ride, and double-cross them, and hand over millions of their fortune as “compensation” for this? Why do men cling to this social construct—which is clearly identifiable as manipulation—in a monogamous (and thus disadvantageous to them) society?
“I am part of that force which would the evil ever do, and ever does the good.”
(Goethe’s Faust)
In my view, men bear the primary blame for the evil in the world: they are incapable of recognizing the fundamental dual nature of women. For evil all too often disguises itself here as angel-like beauty. The more charming the exterior, the more depraved and treacherous the soul. And what here presents itself as in need of protection is, in truth, an invitation to ruin. The woman, on the other hand, is aware of this power, yet fails to recognize the wickedness within it. She is blind to her own abysmal nature. The conflict begins with the original sin.
When women get involved in political matters, the result is usually utter nonsense. They are incapable of formulating a coherent thought or parking a car properly. Not to mention their inability to urinate while standing without completely soiling themselves.
They should devote themselves to the finer things in life that delight the eye (or the stomach). They should also be by our side in bed, for a man needs a companion with small hands and small feet (beware of women with large hands and feet!).
This supposedly German girl with the Czech name Milena, spends her time styling her little head of hair, though it’s not always clear whether it’s a wig or her real hair. Sometimes she seems to be influenced by African styles or exotic looks from science fiction movies.
https://mymodernmet.com/milena-braid-hairstyles/
https://forebears.io/forenames/milena
Do we have to endure generalisations like “no woman can park a car properly” or “Jesus was a Bolshevik”?
Has TOO become OTT?
Pardon, but who exactly is “we”? (Apparently, people who believe the opposite is true.)
The Marxist ideology of so-called “equality” bears the main blame for the pitiful state of the Western world, and no one here is forced to “endure” anything that does not align with their views, because, first of all, that would be a denial of personal responsibility, and second, the internet is full of such content and can be accessed at any time instead.
Btw, I never claimed that “Jesus was the first Bolshevik,” although that comparison doesn’t seem entirely far-fetched. “Playing the victim card” is part of a female mindset, which is at home in the left-wing worldview. If this is a (nowadays unacceptable) “stereotype,” so be it; without generalizations, the world can neither be understood nor described.
PS: A joke without “generalization/exaggeration” is like … “having sex without a genital” (or something like that). We’re not far from that either, once our brains are wired up to “virtual reality” (Brave New World), unworldly, outlandish, unnatural, lifeless, frigid, and sterile. Fish die in distilled water. And laughter dies along.
There’s always a grain of truth in a joke—otherwise it wouldn’t be funny. Of course, of course: There are exceptions to the rule, but they are exactly that: exceptions. But the self-declared “thought police” don’t like “politically incorrect” statements. It not only wants to silence us, but even deprive us of our joy of life.
The crazy thing about the “feminist” mind-virus is that it demands women exhibit the same level of rationality as men. That alone is not only alien, but moreover contrary to GOD (whom they even invoke in this matter!).
Women have their own strengths that don’t require this, such as the ability to give birth to perfect life. As if that weren’t already more than enough, “progressives” intend to corrupt, degrade, degenerate, debase and pervert life itself.
You can have either patriarchy or anarchy. I sure sign of a society has reached the stage of advanced decadence and is teetering on collapse is women installed in positions of authority and so-called leadership. Every institution that is taken over by women becomes a clown show but it’s certainly not a laughing matter.
@ Tim
YOU didn’t say Jesus was the first Bolshevik, and I didn’t say you did. Search the TOO “scriptures” and find who did.
As for egalitarianism, woke censorship, and so forth, there is not much disagreement between us.
The paradox is that the gender-dichotomous but superstitious Africans replace the atheist hedonists of the UK with Christians – and Muslims.
These prayers for peace from Canterbury and Rome never work. Sad but true.