James Fulford: 25 Years Of The SPLC And Me
Earlier on the Fulford File: The SPLC Was NEVER A “Civil Rights Stalwart”—It Was ALWAYS A “Dangerous Joke”
Please Sign Up As A PAID Subscriber: Remember, I’m only on Substack because VDARE was forced to suspend operations by NYAG Letitia James’s lawfare, so if you’re a free subscriber, please upgrade to paid!
Yesterday, the AP reported what no one was expecting from the Trump Administration: Southern Poverty Law Center Charged With Defrauding Donors With Payments To Extremist Informants, AP, April 21, 2026.
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Southern Poverty Law Center was indicted Tuesday on federal fraud charges alleging it improperly raised millions of dollars to secretly pay leaders of the Ku Klux Klan and other hate groups for inside information, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said.
The Justice Department alleges the civil rights group defrauded donors by using their money to fund the very extremism it claimed to be fighting, with more than $3 million paid to informants through a now-defunct program to infiltrate white supremacist and other extremist groups. Prosecutors allege some of the money was used by extremists to carry out other crimes, but court papers did not include specific examples.
Banking expert Patrick McKenzie pointed out on Twitter that Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) laws make it illegal to lie to your bank about what you’re doing with your money, e. g. saying “We’re totally not using this to pay undercover informants” etc.
He adds an image of the SPLC’s banking information being used in the the indictment and says
This is extremely common prosecutorial practice; the only surprising part is the defendant. (About which, doubtless your opinion journal of choice will have some column inches fairly soon.)
And here we are!
A search of VDARE.com archives says that I’ve been writing about the Southern Poverty Law Center for twenty-five years—and I’m not the only one.
They, of course, spent a lot of time writing about VDARE.com, and to a certain extent, me personally. It’s arguable that their attacks on VDARE.com inspired Letitia James’s persecution of VDARE.com, causing me to lose my job:
Yesterday at my local watering hole in Menlo Park, CA. I was reading sitting on a bench outside, when a fresh young female about 14 approached me and wanted to ask me some questions on apparently the general situation. She may have been put up to it but I don’t have anything to hide.
So I told her that we are heading into a big depression probably and the Jewish War on Iran was very big. etc. She wanted more so I began a little improv on jewish power, Blacks, Mexicans, and the usual stuff about how Evolution, not religion, was a more reliable guide to general social, etc. reality. Then two more youngsters showed up, one female, one male. They all began spouting the woke stuff, and I countered with facts about Blacks, Jews, Beaners, etc. all as politely as possible. They listened and responded with more woke idiocies, the young man getting pretty close to impertinent, etc. I got quickly into the natural inequality of races give them the numbers on IQ of Blacks, etc, all of which apparently meant next to nothing to them. Rationality is just too White male and so on. I said, take a look around you right now on the street and find something not invented or developed by White men. Silence of the zombies.
I also advised them about the biology of men and women and to forget about all the lies about trans, boy Floyd a few years back, and so on. The young man continued to be less than repectful and so I told him that he was not respecting his elders and that he was therefore a punk , etc. who knew nothing. This went on for an hour and a half or so.
I got a pretty good dose of wokeness from upper middle class Menlo Park kids. When the shooting starts it is going to he hard to shoot these wholesome white kids as they join in with wogs and assault the cops and us.
https://nationalvanguard.org/2026/04/chaos-at-the-compound-redux-splc-indicted-by-doj/
An angry commenter named Astrid responds to me (not for the first time):
“Karen” is an anti-White slur. It pathologizes White women for their natural attempts to uphold social order — natural, as women are smaller and weaker than men and are in danger in out-of-control public situations where random nons run rampant. It chastises White behavior, present in both males and females, that seeks order and civilized behavior. Women were traditionally the vanguard for enforcing social morality. Now that they are not, do you like it better?
Here’s what I replied:
“Women als vanguard for enforcing social morality”—I assume you’re talking about that infamous feminism. Women engage in women’s politics; men engage in human politics. God made women’s feet smaller than men’s so they could stand closer to the stove.
Women lack the Y chromosome to think beyond their instinctive brood-care behavior. Everything of significance that the world has created originates from men’s minds. “They have to know their place”—and there’s a good reason for the saying.
I consider it a colossal mistake to take women intellectually seriously and involve them in power, for it is an expression of infection by the very same fatal ideology of “equality” that is destroying our race.
Women occupy a middle ground between men and children in terms of physical and mental development, and should be treated accordingly. In hierarchical terms, men are not accountable to women, but to God, if anyone.
Women should conduct themselves modestly; then their overall social and biological contributions to life will be recognized. As soon as they “demand” to be able to compete with men, they inevitably make themselves look ridiculous.
When we say “Karen,” we don’t mean that every white American woman is one; rather, we’re referring to a specific type of woman who is particularly stupid and relies on her physical appearance. Everyone knows women like this; they’re also called ‘bimbo’ (or “Tussi” in Germany).
Jokes about female quirks are perfectly acceptable and as old as humanity itself (just as women joke among themselves about dimwits and/easily seduced men). A real man, however, would not usually hold this against women, and in fact, it is not Baerbock who is to blame for her grotesque role, but the “men” who fawn over her. She is a symptom, not the cause.