L.A.’s 4 Seasons: Fires, Riots, Meth and Election Theft

 

The preposterous spectacle of the recent mayoral runoff election in Los Angeles may be a blessing in disguise—and not just for Republican candidate Spencer Pratt, who can now move his family to Miami. As the entire country saw, Pratt walloped the Indian progressive lady the night of the election, then watched as his lead vanished during a week of ballot “counting.”

The switcheroo was surprising not only because the progressive lady, City Council member Nithya Raman, supports encampments of homeless drug addicts next to grammar schools (unless her kids are forced to gaze upon them) but also because the late-arriving ballots gave Pratt three new votes while delivering about 100,000 new votes for her.

Allegedly, Pratt finished “third.” Voters will now have to choose between a communist in Mayor Karen Bass, and an admitted socialist in “second place finisher” Raman (a smug imbecile who makes New York mayor Zorhan Mamdani look like Winston Churchill).

Liberals have gone from saying You can’t prove we cheated to writing ponderous think pieces in The New York Times boasting about the genius of progressive leadership in our cities. Apparently, releasing criminals and decriminalizing crime has been wildly successful on all counts — homicide rates (“declining”), homelessness (“down”) and drug overdoses (“fallen pretty remarkably”). That’s why, the ponderous think piece by David Wallace-Wells continues, cities are not “shifting right, as many expected, but left.”

Yes, it was simply the power of liberal ideas that won the day.

Liberals accuse right-wingers of lacking every basic human characteristic, but do they really think we lack a prefrontal cortex?

Of course the Los Angeles election was stolen, openly, audaciously, without an ounce of shame. Raman could not be identified by 10 out of 10 Los Angelinos. Couldn’t liberals stop insulting our intelligence and stick to Hahaha, we stole the election and there’s nothing you can do about it?

People make the mistake of assuming the fraud happens only inside a vote-counting room. It does not. It happens within the Alice in Wonderland election scheme that the California Legislature, under Gov. Gavin Newsom’s heavy whip hand, put into place, not just this time but for all time.

These are the same people who say JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon is a billionaire and Da’Quan Alvarado is in the backseat of a police cruiser not because of poor life choices, hard work or raw talent, but because of some invisible and inarticulable “rules” that are stacked against Da’Quan.

The “rules” for California elections are written law. You can look them up. And they don’t merely allow fraud, but guarantee it, on a massive scale.

To ensure that Democrats always win, the scheme implements a laundry list of corrupt practices, designed to benefit the left, such as promiscuously mailing ballots to everybody—every single registered voter, whether requested or not—including people who died or left the state years ago. Ballots are like democracy bearer bonds, pieces of paper that can be cashed by anyone holding them. In California, they simply float around the landscape waiting to be filled out by God knows who.

The U.S. Constitution prescribes a single “day” for elections, but instead of Election Day, California has Election Season, giving activists a month to collect ballots, fill them out and submit them.

To make absolutely clear that this is allowed, even encouraged, the law states that ballots can be legally harvested and submitted by people who are not the voters themselves. Signature checks are nonexistent.

Thus, by the time ballots get to the counting room, the counting itself may be impeccable, but the fraud is already baked in.

Inasmuch as mail-in ballots can be counted as soon as they are received, and ballots continue to be accepted a full week after “Election Day”—to use that quaint misnomer—Democrats can just wait until they see their vote shortfall and then make up the deficit, much as Saddam Hussein might.

In theory, ballots have to be postmarked by election day. But — surprise — the Democrats have a fix for that too. If there’s no postmark, the counters are allowed to look at the voters’ own dating of their signatures. (What could be better evidence?)

These multiple invitations to fraud could not be more perfectly designed to benefit the left if Karl Marx had written them. They await only an army of campaign workers who are unethical, pushy, and self-righteous, and who have a lot of free time on their hands. Say, Democratic Socialists of America (average age: pre-activation of the brain’s decision-making and impulse control center), SEIU workers, unionized teachers, “homeless advocates,” and the thousands of other “activists” “working” for “non-profits.”

(Four sets of scare quotes might seem excessive, but are necessary to remind you that all these people are paid by you, the taxpayer, and electing Democrats will ensure that you pay them even more.)

Republicans have things called “jobs.” They expect to spend no more than an hour or two voting. For liberals, voting is their job. Hard-to-follow election rules are the golden ticket for people who have weeks to devote to every election.

A persistent complaint about Trump is that he is violating the “norms” of whatever behavior liberals are defining as the linchpin of “democracy” that particular day. The AP no longer has a front-row seat in the White House Press Briefing Room? THE NORMS OF OUR DEMOCRACY HAVE BEEN SHATTERED!

How about the norm of citizens expecting elections to be fair without dedicating their lives to cheating better than the next guy? Liberals are worried about Trump violating “norms” by serving McDonald’s to championship teams visiting the White House, but they think nothing of fiddling with something as marginally important as elections.

Despite the obscenity of Mayor Bass getting away with jetting off to Ghana for a party at the height of wildfire season, after having left reservoirs and fire hydrants dry, leading to the complete destruction of the Pacific Palisades, the fleecing of Spencer Pratt may be beneficial to our cause.

Had he been elected mayor, he would have been largely stymied his entire term. But now, the way the Democrats cheated Pratt can be used in every Republican campaign ad for the next 300 years, reminding people that Democrats are liars and thugs who truly don’t care about democracy.