James Edwards interviews Sascha Roßmüller

What follows is an interview conducted by talk radio host James Edwards with Sascha Roßmüller, a German political activist, journalist, and author of Culture, Aesthetics, Identity: Blossoms of the Occidental World.

* * *

James Edwards: What inspired you to write this book?

Sascha Roßmüller: For one thing, I had been looking for a book on art and culture from this specific perspective on identity, but I couldn’t find exactly what I had in mind, which is why the idea took root to express this myself. Ultimately, it also touches on the fundamental question of how we can sustainably protect ourselves from cultural encroachment and alienation if we fail to recognize ourselves in our cross-generational identity. “Know thyself” is the maxim inscribed on the Temple of Apollo at Delphi. Not least, however, it is also far more enjoyable and fulfilling to study our Occidental history through its cultural and artistic highlights than through its bloody wars.

Edwards: You describe culture as an “aesthetic manifestation of our identity” for community-oriented beings with a “tribalistic tendency.” Can you elaborate on this central idea?

Roßmüller: From an etymological perspective, the very concept of identity leaves no doubt that identity is not a purely individualistic phenomenon; indeed, the Latin roots “idem” and “ens, entis” unambiguously point to a “way of being that is of the same kind.” Human beings are by no means merely individuals but social beings; as such, however, they are not a global mass entity but a particular, not an amorphous, group entity. Aristotle, for example, spoke of the Zoon politikon, or more simply, the being of community. The self-knowledge addressed in the first question also constitutes a process, as models of beauty and craftsmanship teach us what we are capable of becoming.

Edwards: Does the book address the tension between individual creativity and collective/tribal identity in cultural production?

Roßmüller: Not in the sense of a conflict between the individual and the collective, but rather as a complementary relationship, whereby this tension should be understood as a source of creative energy. The artist does not operate in a vacuum; they are shaped by the community and, in turn, return their inspiration to it.

Edwards: How do aesthetics serve as a condensed expression of collective self-understanding and identity formation in European traditions?

Roßmüller: A folk also recognizes itself in its aesthetic sensibilities. Anyone who compares works by European artists – which are not solely intended for utility purposes –with those of African design will undoubtedly observe that different concepts of beauty are at play here. Furthermore, art strongly reflects the sociocultural development of the community to which it belongs at a given time; in other words, it reveals, through its traditions, what has become inscribed in the cultural DNA of a cultural circle as a defining element of its identity. There are two things that identity cannot survive: first, ethnic exchange, and second, the drying up of its traditional culture.

Edwards: What role do universally admired works of art play in expressing and reinforcing this cultural identity?

Roßmüller: I think that such cultural art highlights milestones of refinement in good taste and orientation in a generation-spanning manner. And, moreover, the admiration, to marvel in awe like a child exploring his world, provides a thrill of pleasure and mysterious joy combined with a perception of meaning. To put it in the words of Friedrich Nietzsche, one could speak of a “peak of ravishment”, if I translated his term “Verzückungsspitze” correctly.

Edwards: Which specific historical periods, artists, architects, or cultural expressions (e.g., classical, medieval, Renaissance, or folk traditions) do you highlight as prime examples of this aesthetic identity in the book?

Roßmüller: Indeed, I have a favorite period, the one a German contemporary philosopher and literary author said the Germans would have an affair with it, so I´m probably a typical German in that regard: The period of Romanticism. I appreciate the correction of the partly soulless, seemingly exaggerated rationalism of the Enlightenment; however, without discarding the latter`s achievements.

Edwards: Which particular “blossoms of the Occidental World” might readers find surprising or particularly illuminating?

Roßmüller: I can imagine that some readers will find it illuminating to hear about cultural exchanges and the relationship between, for example, Goethe and Lord Byron, particularly their intertextual relations in their respective writings. Moreover, illuminating could be, because usually one doesn`t learn much about it, the art scenery and cultural activities during the Third Reich in Germany, which I also touch on in my book. As “surprising”, last but not least, it may be to get shown what excellence some geniuses had, although lacking higher education, or the philosophical depth of some rural vernacular writers in their stages, plays for the ordinary folk.

Edwards: In what ways have modernity or globalization impacted the organic link between culture, aesthetics, and identity that you explore?

Roßmüller: Quite recently, I´ve learned from an article from 1995 that the CIA used American modern art as a weapon in the Cold War by promoting American Abstract Expressionist painting around the world for more than 20 years. In general, I think today`s art scene is an establishment-promoted business and not an expression of a vocation of skilled artists, which is why we are abused with affected showmanship, completely lacking contemplative depth.

Edwards: What practical lessons or calls to action would you offer for preserving, reviving, or creating culturally authentic aesthetics in the 21st century?

Roßmüller: First and foremost, start engaging with art and culture. Let me give a quote from Goethe, what he put in the mouth of one figure of his famous educational novel “Wilhelm Meister”: “Every day one should hear at least one little song, read a good poem, see an excellent painting and, if possible, say a few sensible words.” I think that is good advice. Just as an athlete trains his muscles, so should a cultured person refine his taste.

Edwards: What do you hope readers – whether familiar with identitarian thought or new to it – will take away from your book, and how can they purchase a copy?

Roßmüller: Maybe they’ll take away the awareness that beauty can save the world, as Fyodor Dostoevsky once said. Hopefully, readers, particularly the contested political dissidents, can realize that beautiful art and culture can recharge their batteries when daily challenges in an ugly world seem to be becoming too overwhelming. The English version of my book is available for order here.

Sascha Roßmüller

18 replies
  1. Tim
    Tim says:

    Sascha now even has his own “podcast harem”; one of its members goes by Sally Hausfrau (Housewife). Even he, a reliable Bavarian family man, couldn’t resist, because his brain was overwhelmingly flooded with flirtation hormones, overriding his ability to make his own decisions.

    His podcast harem had even gone out of their way to spell his name correctly using a letter not found on English keyboards; such an honor is not always bestowed upon him even in his homeland, since the “bio-Germans” there have largely been replaced by “neo-Germans.”

    In his enthusiasm, Sascha returned the favor with some unique idiomatic quirks, without, however, drawing the ridicule of his tactful listeners: “My son became (instead of got) a cell phone.” No, Sascha, the German word “bekam” doesn’t mean the same thing in English. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHgctQSa3HA

    https://rumble.com/v7bbm48-sascha-a.-romller.html
    https://rumble.com/v7alpj2-book-review-legal-truthful-guilty.html

  2. Tim
    Tim says:

    PS: Unlike Sascha, however, I would have behaved—and indeed proceeded—quite differently, trusting that everything—that is, all attitudes, experiences, and so on—would emerge from the conversation itself.

    So I would have spent less time talking about myself, my background, my plans, and so on, and instead tried to build bridges—through questions, but also, for example, by bringing up the topic of German women. That would certainly have interested the ladies more than dry political theorizing.

    Women are usually very bored by dry intellectual theory; you have to engage with them on a personal, emotional level to spark their interest, get them to open up, and win their inner warmth and cooperation. But that’s just how personalities differ. Sascha is just Sascha.

    I’ll give him credit for this—he probably understands “political theory” or even day-to-day politics better than I do, since I’ve never really delved into or grappled with that sort of thing. I’m just not the type for it, and my time is simply too precious to waste on it. I’m also not an “activist” like Martin Sellner, although I have the utmost respect for what he does.

  3. Tim
    Tim says:

    Unfortunately, many—indeed, most—men are very self-conscious and awkward when dealing with the opposite sex. Why this is so is a mystery to me. The exciting adventure of masculinity lies precisely in the intellectual unraveling of female mysteries.

    One could also say that a man is capable of making sense of a woman’s complex emotions. A woman needs a man as a mirror that reflects her true self, in which she wants to see her character accurately portrayed.

  4. Tim
    Tim says:

    Imagine you’re missing out on a wonderful opportunity to entertain yourself and others. But you end up boring them because, in truth, you’re a bore who bores even yourself. Is that even conceivable or possible? Unfortunately, all too often. Narrow-minded, narcissistic self-absorption means total anti-wisdom.

    It is, so to speak, utter mediocrity that today presumes to claim “intellectual superiority” over common sense. By what God-given, natural right, exactly? However, the average depends heavily on the overall level of intellectual capacity, and that has definitely declined by a factor of x in recent decades.

  5. Tim
    Tim says:

    Women operate on a lower intellectual level,
    which allows them to raise children within a
    small circle but not engage in “world politics.”

    This is not out of malice but simply their
    natural disposition. A guy who believes
    women are his “equals” is, in truth, not
    a man but a clown and a mama’s boy.

    In doing so, he demonstrates his own
    worldly inexperience and degradation.
    (“Intellectual” means also “spiritual.”)

    • Tim
      Tim says:

      I want to return to my argument that women are not the equals of men (in certain respects). This does not imply any judgment of worth as such. For example, men are not equal to women when it comes to giving birth.

      Or let me give you another example: Men generally consider their children—and even their wives—to be more valuable than themselves; that is why the saying in emergencies is always: “Women and children first!”

      Some might object that there are exceptions to the rule. That’s true—a plumber can also be a good cook. But I still wouldn’t hire a plumber if I were looking for a cook. And I certainly wouldn’t hire a woman if I were looking for a political analyst.

      How can one determine a person’s worth? Everyone is equally valuable—that’s what people say these days. All of this, they say, stems from the fact that the Nazis, for example, regarded people with disabilities as “unworthy of life.”

      The ideology of equality and human dignity holds that the same applies to peoples, ethnic groups, and races. Bantu-Negroes or Aborigines, for example, are just as valuable as South Koreans or Japanese.

      The value of a people or an individual exists, so to speak, independently of their contribution to world culture. Their value lies in their very being—that is, in their mere existence—without their having to make any contribution to the whole.

      If this alone, purely intuitively, runs counter to all cosmic and natural order, the falsity of this ideology becomes even more evident when we compare the value of an employer who provides for thousands of families with that of a murderer sentenced to death.

      • Tim
        Tim says:

        Here we witness the typical result of “political
        commentary” from a strictly vaginal perspective.
        https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/22/world/britain-prime-minister.html

        Sheer ‘cohencidence’ that such silly geese are courted by Jews:”A 2023 article by Maxim Biller in the German national weekly Die Zeit described her family background, education, and career path from Paris to Berlin, London, and Cardiff. The article also discussed her interest in German political memory, her life as a German expatriate and the persistence of far-right ideology in Europe.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katrin_Bennhold

      • Tim
        Tim says:

        Jews always send others ahead of them. They’re best at hiding behind stupid white women who, out of endless narcissistic vanity, are unreservedly receptive to their sycophancy.

  6. Frank
    Frank says:

    Good point about the CIA and cramming modern Art down our throats.
    Just about everything at a gallery is, and I should say everything at a gallery that’s new is ugly, hideous.
    Much, or all of it is just cartoons, undermining any sort of history.
    Winston, in 1984, spent the entire novel trying to figure out if the things the government was telling him, we’re true.
    He couldn’t do it, because they had a rest all of history

  7. PS
    PS says:

    Just imagine the fuss the Americans made over their “national trauma of 9/11,” which, oh so, still weighs on their national psyche to this day. 3,000 multiracial “Americans” are said to have perished in the attacks.

    By way of comparison: statistically, that many Germans died every single day for four years during World War II! Just consider the casualties caused by the Anglo-American terror bombers (who cynically called themselves “liberators”).

    In Hamburg alone, during the worst of their attacks (“Operation Gomorrah”—what a fitting Old Testament name for a true Holocaust!), the “official” death toll is said to have been 40,000—which means 2,000 to as many as 4,000 deaths per square kilometer in the residential districts that were particularly hard-hit.

    Here is a film that, according to the description, was allegedly shot in Hamburg by Swedish “Good Templars” three years after the war, even though the car seen in it bears the inscription “Swedish Red Cross.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGnxULC5O80

    Somewhere in the film, an Indian shrunken head can also be seen—exactly the kind that was presented as a “victim” by the Brits and their Jew-masters in Buchenwald. Even today, people still talk about it, often assuming it to be a true event.

    What diabolical spirit dwells within this sort of “humanoid” to concoct something so demonic in order to dehumanize Germans as monsters?

    I recommend reducing the video’s playback speed to 80%, which is closest to the original, and muting the sound, since the music will also be slowed down or distorted as a result.

    • Alex
      Alex says:

      I think it is well to remember that the constellation of Jews that gave us the atom bomb, did so with such enthusiasm because they were sure it was going to be dropped on Germany (and in Edward Teller’s case, he was also keen on it being used on the USSR right afterward).

      Jews love it when goyim die.

      Orthodox, Reform, Hasidim, Conservative, clad in all black like a 18th century Polish land owner or wearing dreadlocks and a nose ring, if they’re Jewish they believe in Judaism and all you have to do is read their books which are no secret, no secret at all. We goyim have no souls, are animals to be used, etc.

      • PS
        PS says:

        One more thought on “Women in Politics”: As I mentioned earlier, Jews systematically promote female dominance (particularly vigorously through the so-called “Second Wave of Feminism”). The goal is to disempower and drive out men.

        However, in tribal societies, women have never had to develop strategic considerations for the tribe’s survival. By nature, they lack the mental capacity for abstract thought; their realm is the mundane details of daily life.

        Genetically, they are incapable of distinguishing between friend and foe, but instead chase after the latest “trend.” There are all these reports of women throwing themselves at the conqueror (the enemy in war). Women in positions of power are poison.

        An astonishing video that debunks all the lies claiming that National Socialism was “anti-European.” That much “folkish” European diversity would be a nightmare for the “EU”! Unfortunately, I couldn’t find the video on the original channel—only a clip.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnLfzwb7-QQ
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWMKybXg0aI

        In any case, I don’t think this is, as it’s described, a “color video,” like the Swedish one (by the way, the pretty Swedish lady from the Hamburg video is using a Rolleiflex—was it stolen, like the patents?). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolleiflex

        The filmmaker, who apparently had the privilege of filming even Robert Ley from such a close distance, seems to have been particularly smitten with a Romanian beauty, whom he repeatedly focuses his camera on. Yet she paradoxically conveys a sense of unapproachability.

      • Karen Crockett
        Karen Crockett says:

        “Jews love it when goyim die” and the parasites die with their host? Not THAT stupid. Look up the former UK Chief Rabbi Sacks on European racial suicide.
        What are the Jewish books you have actually read, apart from quotes in English from a few passages in the Babylonian Talmud or Chabad ravings? A list would be welcome. Not all Jews “believe in Judaism”. Hitler defined them genetically, and they mostly stick with that.
        Teller was an exception to the comsymps like Oppenheimer. Jews (Koval, Seborer, Rosenberg, &c) were prominent among the agents who helped Soviet Russia develop nuclear weaponry, first secretly tested in August 1949.
        Germany was working on atomic energy with Hahn and Heisenberg, and Hitler regretted the departure of Meitner, but the Manhattan Project beat them to it. The relevant books by Mark Walker and David Irving should be compared – with care.

      • Bernadine Rahn
        Bernadine Rahn says:

        @ Alex
        Most Jews do not hold that Gentiles are like animals without souls any more than most Aryans share the view that Jews are “baciillus that must be eliminated and destroyed” (Goebbels) and “antisemitism is not a question of Weltanschauung, but of cleansing” (Himmler). “The Jew is not a human being…a fission fungus” (Buch). “One does not negotiate with trichina [but] will beannihilated as quickly as possible” (Rosenberg, citing Lagarde. “The battle in which we are engaged is of the same sort as the battle waged by Pasteur and Koch” (Hitler).

        • Terry Fyde
          Terry Fyde says:

          Looking up Himmler’s 1943 Posen speech in German Rudolf’s revisionist “Holocaust Encyclopedia” I can almost feel his disappointment that Germans knew a “good Jew”; a bit annoying when you’re planning to kill their kids. Though that wouldn’t trouble every contributor here.

  8. Tom Sunic
    Tom Sunic says:

    Sascha’s book, written in German, is a must-read. Through a simple narrative, it spans the gigantic European and Germanic heritage from medieval times to modernity. Incidentally, it is little known that thousands of German poets and novelists have been removed from EU school curricula or simply banned by post-WWII world-improvers. Sascha very well synthesizes several great German minds into a larger framework. This book is a concise compendium, easy to read and written in accessible German. Bravo to the English translation, and kudos to James Edwards—a great Southern gentleman and host.

Comments are closed.