A royal Hasidic wedding

/27 Comments/in /by

More evidence that Cofnas was right. Jews are not particularly ethnocentric.

27 replies
  1. Tim
    Tim says:

    That must be an extremely strange “God”
    who selects these folks “his chosen ones.”
    Even Papuan cannibals inspire more trust.

    • Alex
      Alex says:

      The cult of Ba’al isn’t, in the end, any more picky about race than the Scientologists. Are you useful to the cult? Are you willing to do anything for the cult and yes obviously this includes carpet-bombing civilians, sniping preschoolers, “white slavery” in “first world” countries, every and any crime possible no matter how vile? Then you’re in!

      • Tim
        Tim says:

        I don’t believe in all that Torah/Talmud nonsense.
        On this point, I’m on the side of the “racial anti-
        Semites,” who suspect that these individuals re-
        present a perversion of human form of existence.

        It is highly likely, however, that it originated in this
        “way of thinking,” but then again, thinking is also al-
        ways linked to a certain disposition and personality.

        In other words, they must have already been ill at the
        time these mental monstrosities came into being. Un-
        less, there really is a “God,” but he has imposed with
        the Jew’s absolute evil—an eternal test on humanity.

        So I believe that Jews act wickedly, not because they
        follow their “commandments,” but because they uncon-
        sciously play and fulfill a destructive role in the world.

        Not all of them, of course, but a significant number
        of them hold leading positions in Western societies.

      • Tim
        Tim says:

        In other words: Most Jews most likely
        have no idea who or what “Ba’al” is or
        was. But what “Ba’al” brought into be-
        ing still lingers within them – and this
        with a frightening sense of continuity.

      • Tim
        Tim says:

        Of course, these Jews don’t have to play
        a “leading role” in Western societies. So-
        me of them simply inject an incredibly de-
        structive “idea” into our system—whether
        it’s communism or the “contraceptive pill”.

  2. Roman Pagan
    Roman Pagan says:

    I feel a sense of aversion and awareness of danger triggered, it seems, at the DNA level when watching this. This is the stuff of nightmares.

  4. Pierre de Craon
    Pierre de Craon says:

    My favorite bit is the part where the Hasidic narrator says “this one seems much more like an everyday wedding.” Absolutely! Who hasn’t been to a wedding in a gym where all hundred or so male guests wear sable hats?

    Sarcasm aside, the most striking thing about both the garb and the people themselves is the total absence of beauty. They seem unaware that they have perverted solemnity into a mere display of wealth.

    • Jane Doe
      Jane Doe says:

      M. de Craon, how many Jewish marriage ceremonies have you attended? Women wear head coverings in church, men in synagogues – so what? Don’t wealthy Christians dress up for weddings, first communions, funerals? Jesus, his Mother and his apostles were Jews? Were they all “ugly”? People can’t help the faces they are born with. What do you look like? Are you as lovely as your pretentious pronouncements on other people?

      • crier de paon
        crier de paon says:

        According to the church fathers Origen, Irenaeus, Justin Martyr, Tertullian and Clement of Alexandria, also the Slavonic Josephus, Jesus was ugly. Byzantine missionaries said he was lame in one leg: “physician, heal thyself” (a disqualification for Jewish priesthood). “Earliest” pictures depict him as a beardless youth with a magic wand; obviously quite imaginary. Further information: Wikipedia; Callie Callon, Jacob Taubes, Fernand Prat, Walter Bauer. The Holy “Shroud” of Turin is a fake. At any rate, Jesus looked more like Volodymyr Zelensky than Ted Neely.

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        Never anything but insults and slanders from Jane Doe and crier de paon (Peacock’s cry), who are one and the same obsessive attacker. Whose dirty work is he/she doing? Why?

        • Jane Doe
          Jane Doe says:

          As usual, no refutation but annoyance from Pierrot de nos jours.
          I work for the IDF,ADL,AIPAC,SPLC at 10 shekels per troll to ensure the global triumph of the Elders of Zion behind the curtains and under the bed.
          Why do YOU hide behind a medieval screen name?

    • Roy Albrecht
      Roy Albrecht says:

      Já, já. Function follows form. The innate ugliness of the Judentype is most striking when stripped of its almost Amish-like, but plush, coverings and compare them to a typical nude Aryan Übermensch.
      Inbreeding, defective, genetic asthetics aside, these demonstrations of hyper ethnocentric rituals, by cohorts of multimillionaire Judenfleisch, are vital components of in-group, peer recognition, conspiracy enabling networking.
      They show us the tightly knit festivities, but neglect to include the after-party criminal networking.
      It’s how, for example, Judenfleisch was able to allert all Jews to stay home from work on 9-11, or how Judenfleisch is able to coordinate international conspiracies against Weissmänner and then follow cover-up by blaming their White victims for the crimes they committed.

      How many schmucks
      Could a Weissmann schlacht
      If a Weissmann could schlacht Schmucks?

  5. Salacia
    Salacia says:

    I’ve only recently learned about ‘bishul akum’ – jews are not supposed to eat food cooked by non-jews. It is no coincidence that sharing meals builds trust and social cohesion.

    These people are beyond sick. Everything about them is completely alien and repulsive and yet some ‘conservatives’ still insist that our civilization is ‘judeo-christian’.

    • Wizard of Zog
      Wizard of Zog says:

      These dietary restrictions in detail do seem ludicrous and weird. The main idea behind them is to prevent outbreeding: a shared dinner means a shared date. Some rabbis say it is OK to eat with Gentiles if the food is kosher, and no alcohol is drunk. However, Jews in practice ignore these rules, and eat what and where they want. Anyway, Salacia, are you that keen to share meals with them?

  6. Anon
    Anon says:

    I would like to understand how ethnocentrism works at the biological level. Let’s say we do an experiment were we put an equal amount of Ashkenazi, European, Chinese, American-Indian, and African babies on an empty island and have the babies raised by robots in a culturally neutral way. Would certain biological markers cause the races to group together? Would the Ashkenazim be naturally attracted to people who look like them, behave like them, and perhaps give off certain racially unique permones and odors? Would these biological markers cause them to be more Altruistic to others who have these same biological markers?

    And have we identified ethnocentrism genes that cause Ashkenazim to modulate their Altruism/behavior based on these biological markers?

    Obviously, no nation will carry out the above research, not even China. I do remember the study in the past where the reactions of babies to the faces of different races resulted in the same conclusion as Prof. MacDonald, with European babies showing the least ethnocentrism and Ashkenazi ones showing the most.

    • Antonia Gregor
      Antonia Gregor says:

      Infant ethnocentrism?
      Search online for various studies on “babies show own-race preference” & confirming that.
      What would differentiate Ashkenazi faces from the others, Dr MacDonald?

      • Jane Doe
        Jane Doe says:

        “Jewish baby featured on cover of Nazi magazine dies at 91,” THE DAILY BEAST, on-line. Search (other) Jewish baby face photos. Can’t see much difference, but then I am in the pay of the IDF/ADL/AIPAC/SPLC/Meta.

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        Jane, Peacock, WoZ, and you, Antonia. Four screen names concealing a single Jew-adjacent apologist for ethnocentrism run wild.

        I’d suggest, as the old saying goes, that you fight like a man, except that you are deliberately sowing doubt as to whether your sexual identity is biological or simply a “gender choice” that fluctuates from momemt to moment.

        • Jane Doe
          Jane Doe says:

          Thank you for the compliment, mon vieux, but why would anyone normal choose a pseudonym based on a medieval troublemaker (q.v. Pierre de Craon, Wikipedia)?
          Why not answer the comments – e.g. was Jesus an ugly Jew, in your opinion?

          • Pierre de Craon
            Pierre de Craon says:

            A stalker with thirty or more online IDs and a fifteen-year obsession with another person’s screen name is in no position to question anyone else’s normality.

            I’ll tell you again what I told you when you were just plain old Ned Casper. Why I chose my screen name is no business of yours. Deal with it.

Comments are closed.