Haaretz on Netanyahu’s desperation

Despite his best efforts, Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu keeps bumping his head on a polling glass ceiling that refuses to crack. His Likud party is stuck in the low twenties in projected Knesset seats, a far cry from the 32 seats it won in 2022, and his coalition bloc is being overtaken by the opposition camp – led by Gadi Eisenkot – which is nudging the magic parliamentary majority number of 61 seats.

So the premier has decided to go into an encyclopaedic form of election hyperdrive, assembling, agitating and exploiting every possible front to extract more votes while, Steve Bannon-style, flooding the zone to inundate, confuse and exhaust the opposition. And he seems to be taking inspiration from the most ravenous incarnations of AI.

Just in the last day or so, Netanyahu has sent Israeli warplanes to bomb Idlib in Syria, southern Lebanon and the Gaza beachfront. His government has released tenders for construction in the E1 area of the West Bank, which everyone knows is aimed to thwart the territorial contiguity of any future Palestinian state. He has allowed settlers to continue intimidating Palestinian families in Qusra, while not even rapping the knuckles of his national security minister, Itamar-Ben-Gvir, who called to kill “30 or 40” Gazans a day.

He celebrated the retrieval from Syria of the body of the last remaining IDF casualty of the 1982 battle of Sultan Yacoub, Yehuda Katz, with the stunningly hypocritical claim that he has always been “committed” to bringing Israel’s missing and hostages home, as if he can memory hole his serial torpedoing of negotiations to release the suffering hostages held by Hamas.

He praised U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s announcement that the U.S. would sanction the president of the International Criminal Court, which just happens to have a warrant out for his arrest on charges of war crimes. He engineered a sycophantic list of Likud candidates, mocking its internal elections process while fittingly rewarding the architects of his assault on Israel’s democracy. …

But for Netanyahu, 69 days before his fate is decided at the ballot box, the instant gratification of bombs and demagoguery easily beats the slower burn of diplomacy and strategy. The lives and safety of Israelis and Palestinians, together with international law and whatever remains here of political norms, are just collateral damage.

 

 

25 replies
  1. Tim
    Tim says:

    The gloomy, negatively charged Scorpio Moon weighs heavily on the soul in a very tangible way. Until then, themes such as fear, paranoia, secrecy, mistrust, crime, control, power, and sexuality will dominate.

    Don’t let the gloomy mood drag you down and pull you into brooding. Cheer yourself up with light poetry, humor, and uplifting music. In 10 hours, it will finally move into optimistic Sagittarius.

    Astrologer and Capricorn Norbert Giesow from Kiel, born in 1961, urges his audience to engage in serious soul-searching through his daily interpretations (AI-generated audio track available in English).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uegay1Nbo9M

    Incidentally, Kiel—like hundreds of other cities—was almost completely destroyed on multiple occasions in the 1940s by Anglo-American terror bombings targeting its civilian population in the service of their Jewish masters.

    As we all know, this was never prosecuted as a war crime, but has instead been distorted to this day as an “act of liberation.” What is called “Kiel” today bears no resemblance to the original. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Bombing_of_Kiel_in_World_War_II

    The Holocaust Industry is a billion-dollar business, not just for the filthy rich Hollywood Jews. A few hundred thousand bucks can easily be made from yet another in the endless stream of sensationalist “books”—which also stirs up greed among non-Jews. And this also gives rise to disputes over who gets a slice of the pie. https://archive.is/zF5Zi

    “Remember that Stroop lived in the shadow of the gallows, and this situation encourages people to talk.” [sic] “My father tried to talk to publishers in the late 60s, but the book was banned, totally banned.” [why?]

    “It was not possible for Moczarski to take any notes in prison and he had to write the book from memory.” “My father built a kind of castle in his head. He could write in his head. He said once that for long-term prisoners the ability to hear is different and you learn to remember.”

    One thing is certain: This work is a must-read of the utmost, most compelling credibility!
    https://www.theguardian.com/books/2026/aug/17/conversations-with-an-executioner-a-chilling-classic-reveals-the-mind-of-a-nazi-mass-murderer

  2. Karen Crockett
    Karen Crockett says:

    Leaving Tim’s latest rhabdomancy aside to address the thread: search online Gershon Bashkin, “Trump must stop Netanyahu…” JERUSALEM POST, August 2026.

  3. Funny Fannie
    Funny Fannie says:

    Not all the Karens in the world can
    decipher Tim’s irony at first glance.
    Women deserve men’s forbearance.

    • Pierre-Bruce de MacBurger
      Pierre-Bruce de MacBurger says:

      Astrology should not be confused with “rhabdomancy,” even though to those unfamiliar with history, the two may seem interchangeable. Astrology is the ancient cosmological study of the constellations of the moving celestial bodies in our solar system in relation to one another and their (perceived or actual) effect on world events, the character of individuals, or the nature of time, whereas rhabdomancy was originally a form of divination but is no longer used today for “fortune-telling”; instead, surprisingly, we learn the following:

      Even today, some people consider the divining rod a suitable tool for detecting “water veins.” Diviners are hired by both private individuals and companies. For example, the German Society for Technical Cooperation (GTZ) employed diviners to search for water in well-construction projects. ASFINAG, the Austrian Motorway and Expressway Financing Corporation, which operates the network of motorways and expressways in Austria, also employed dowsers and pendulum users until 2007 as part of its efforts to reduce accidents, alongside other measures.

      Sometimes modern dowsing rods are manufactured in the form of high-tech-style detection devices, but their mode of operation does not differ from that of traditional dowsing rods. In 2009, The New York Times reported on a device with an antenna that is used in Iraq to detect explosives and drugs. A review of the device revealed that it is unsuitable for detecting explosives and drugs. However, Iraqi Interior Minister Jehad al-Jabiri maintains that the device is fully functional.

      AI says:

      Very few famous people in world history are explicitly documented as believers in rhabdomancy, but several notable figures across centuries are recorded as having used, endorsed, or defended it—often in the context of finding water, minerals, or even in military or criminal investigations.

      ### Early modern and Enlightenment-era figures

      – Georgius Agricola (1494–1555) – The great mining scientist described dowsing in De Re Metallica (1556), though he was skeptical and attributed the rod’s motion to the operator’s manipulation rather than any supernatural force.
      – Sir William Barrett (1844–1925) – Professor of experimental physics and co-founder of the Society for Psychical Research; he investigated dowsers for decades and concluded there was a genuine, if unexplained, “cryptesthetic” faculty in some people.
      – Sir William Crookes (1832–1919) – Eminent chemist and physicist who tested dowsers and reported that their powers seemed to fail when they stood on insulating materials like glass, suggesting (to him) an electrical or subtle-energy mechanism.

      ### Royalty and political leaders

      – Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany – Reported in 1909 to have “availed himself of the divining rod on more than one occasion.”
      – Adolf Hitler – During World War II, Hitler reportedly deployed thousands of water diviners to the Siegfried Line to locate water and ensure dry gun emplacements; he is cited among the practice’s high-profile defenders.

      ### Religious and mystical figures

      – Abbé Mermet (Swiss priest, early 20th century) – A well-known continental dowser who used a pendulum/divining rod to trace routes of missing persons and crime scenes; his manuals were widely circulated in Europe.
      – Moses (biblical tradition) – Some later esoteric and radiesthesia writers retrospectively interpret Moses’ staff (parting the Red Sea, striking the rock for water) as a form of rhabdomancy, though this is not a claim from the biblical text itself.

      ### Others

      – Various miners and rural “water witches” – From 16th-century Saxony to 19th–20th century England, Cornwall, and beyond, countless unnamed dowsers were locally famous and employed by estates, councils, and even water companies.
      – Literary references – Characters like Bathsheba Everdene in Thomas Hardy’s Far from the Madding Crowd are depicted using rhabdomancy to choose a husband, reflecting its cultural penetration.

      ## Important caveats

      – Many of these figures are cited by dowsing advocates and historical surveys rather than by their own detailed treatises on rhabdomancy.
      – Skeptical scientific bodies (e.g., the U.S. Geological Survey in 1917) concluded there was no reliable evidence that rhabdomancy worked beyond chance, observation, and the ideomotor effect.
      – Some attributions (e.g., Moses, ancient emperors) come from later occult or radiesthesia literature reinterpreting older stories, not from contemporary testimony.

      AI clearly distinguishes such nonsense from astrology and compiles an (incomplete) list regarding astrology and world history:

      ## Ancient Near East and Egypt

      Sargon of Akkad, Hammurabi, Ashurbanipal, Nabonidus, Nebuchadnezzar II, Cambyses II, Darius I, Xerxes I, Ptolemy III Euergetes, Cleopatra VII, Nectanebo II

      ## Greek and Hellenistic world

      Pythagoras, Empedocles, Plato, Aristotle, Eudoxus of Cnidus, Hipparchus, Berossus, Apollonius of Myndus, Hippocrates, Galen, Posidonius, Chrysippus, Panaetius, Thrasyllus, Dorotheus of Sidon, Vettius Valens, Claudius Ptolemy, Firmicus Maternus, Hephaistio of Thebes, Porphyry, Iamblichus, Plotinus, Proclus, Synesius of Cyrene

      ## Roman rulers and intellectuals

      Julius Caesar, Augustus, Tiberius, Nero, Hadrian, Septimius Severus, Caracalla, Diocletian, Constantine the Great, Julian the Apostate, Cicero, Varro, Nigidius Figulus, Manilius, Pliny the Elder, Macrobius, Rhetorius of Egypt

      ## Indian and Persian traditions

      Varāhamihira, Āryabhaṭa, Brahmagupta, Bhāskara I, Bhāskara II, Bhoja of Dhar, Vikramāditya, Kaniṣka I, Māshāʾallāh ibn Atharī, Abū Maʿshar al-Balkhī, Al-Kindī, Al-Bīrūnī, Al-Maʾmūn, Al-Manṣūr, Hārūn al-Rashīd, Al-Muʿtaṣim, Aḥmad ibn Ṭūlūn, Ibn ʿArabī, Jalāl al-Dīn Rūmī, Timur, Ulugh Beg, Akbar, Jahāngīr, Shah Jahan, Aurangzeb

      ## China, Korea, and Japan

      King Wen of Zhou, Duke of Zhou, Qin Shi Huang, Emperor Wu of Han, Sima Qian, Zhang Heng, Wang Chong, Ge Hong, Emperor Taizong of Tang, Emperor Xuanzong of Tang, Emperor Taizu of Song, Emperor Huizong of Song, Kublai Khan, Hongwu Emperor, Yongle Emperor, Kangxi Emperor, Qianlong Emperor, Sejong the Great of Korea, King Yeongjo of Korea, Emperor Kanmu of Japan, Emperor Go-Daigo, Abe no Seimei, Ashikaga Yoshimitsu, Oda Nobunaga, Toyotomi Hideyoshi, Tokugawa Ieyasu

      ## Medieval Europe

      Isidore of Seville, Bede, Gerbert of Aurillac – Pope Sylvester II, Hugh of Saint-Victor, Albertus Magnus, Thomas Aquinas, Roger Bacon, Robert Grosseteste, Dante Alighieri, Geoffrey Chaucer, Christine de Pizan, Nicole Oresme, John of Saxony, Guido Bonatti, Cecco d’Ascoli, Arnald of Villanova, Pietro d’Abano, John of Jandun, King Alfonso X of Castile, Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor, Richard II of England, Edward IV of England, Henry VII of England, Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, Louis XI of France, Charles VIII of France, Catherine de’ Medici, Francis I of France, Henry II of France, Elizabeth I of England, James I of England, Rudolf II, Holy Roman Emperor, Christian IV of Denmark, Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden, Pope Julius II, Pope Leo X, Pope Paul III, Pope Urban VIII

      ## Renaissance and early modern thinkers

      Marsilio Ficino, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, Johannes Reuchlin, Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa, Paracelsus, Girolamo Cardano, Luca Gaurico, Michel Nostradamus, John Dee, Tycho Brahe, Johannes Kepler, Galileo Galilei, Christopher Clavius, Francis Bacon, William Lilly, Jean-Baptiste Morin, Johannes Schöner, Simon Forman, Robert Fludd, Athanasius Kircher, Jakob Böhme, Thomas Browne, William Harvey, René Descartes, Baruch Spinoza, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Isaac Newton

      ## Modern occultists, writers, and psychologists

      William Blake, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, William Butler Yeats, D. H. Lawrence, Henry Miller, Aleister Crowley, Éliphas Lévi, Helena Blavatsky, Annie Besant, Rudolf Steiner, Alice Bailey, Dane Rudhyar, Alan Leo, Evangeline Adams, Marc Edmund Jones, Paul Choisnard, André Barbault, C. G. Jung, Marie-Louise von Franz, James Hillman, Erich Bauer, Michel Gauquelin, Carl Gustav Jung, Theodor Adorno

      ## Political leaders in the twentieth century

      Woodrow Wilson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Ronald Reagan, Nancy Reagan, Adolf Hitler, Rudolf Hess, Heinrich Himmler, Joseph Goebbels, Benito Mussolini, Francisco Franco, Charles de Gaulle, Indira Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Morarji Desai, Rajiv Gandhi, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Sukarno, Suharto, Pol Pot, Muammar Gaddafi, Mobutu Sese Seko, Hafez al-Assad

      ## Important borderline cases

      Alexander the Great, Charlemagne, Maimonides, Copernicus, Newton, Kepler, Galileo, Jung, Pico della Mirandola, Al-Bīrūnī, Rudolf Steiner, Chinese emperors generally

      Principal documented categories:

      1. Professional astrologers, such as Ptolemy, Valens, Abū Maʿshar, Cardano, Lilly, and Kepler.
      2. Rulers who consulted astrologers, such as Augustus, Tiberius, Catherine de’ Medici, Elizabeth I, Akbar, and several Chinese emperors.
      3. Philosophers and scientists who accepted celestial influence, such as Aristotle, Aquinas, Ficino, Galileo, Brahe, and Kepler.
      4. Qualified or symbolic believers, such as Plotinus, Pico, Jung, and Rudhyar.
      5. People often incorrectly described as believers, especially Newton, Maimonides, Cicero, and Adorno.

      • Carlos Che Guevara
        Carlos Che Guevara says:

        @Pierre-Bruce de MacBurger

        Thank you very much! That’s absolutely right (which is more than some of the supposedly “intellectually potent” participants in current events here can manage): Of course, you can interpret everything in any way you like—and even all at once.

        But the Jews, with their Talmud, know that there needs to be a point of reference—a system, a concept—around which everything revolves.

        Just like Ring’s theory, which makes perfect sense (unlike the nonsense spouted by so-called contemporaries). The “interpretation” is and remains, therefore, a matter of perspective.

    • Yeah
      Yeah says:

      On top of that, to recommend the
      “JP” (I myself only know KMD, who
      “studies” it every day and links it).

  4. Emil
    Emil says:

    Absolutely right. There is clerly a deficit in his “character”. It’s called selective censorship by subtle character attacks to control the narrative and make Tim look bad. It is a abusive, manipulative, unethical harrassment. Tim should pause his participation in this clownish “circus”.

    His ridiculous “attacks” (or what that even is supposed to be) always follow the same pattern: He indirectly admits to reading Tim’s comments instead of ignoring them (as everyone does or could do), but then makes a disparaging remark, which is the real reason for his “comment”.

    But to make this “unrecognizable”, he chooses an utterly trivial pretext, such as a link that “fits the article”. The attacks usually consist of one sentence. He makes a claim about Tim (negative comparisons and generalizations) without explaining or justifying it, he wouldn’t be able to do so.

  5. Emil
    Emil says:

    It’s obvious to everyone that something is wrong with his “psychological architecture.” He reviews and publishes Tim’s comments, but then—contradictorily—allows the most insidious, below-the-belt attacks against him.

    Launched from ambush, indirectly, in a generalized manner, and in the third person. In my opinion, the moderator and the attacker can only be of the same “identity”; one could also speak of a schizoid, socially split personality.

  6. Emil
    Emil says:

    PS: Presumably, the ridiculous delusion that drives him is now, in his old
    age, even more pronounced than ever before. Beware of senile lunatics!

  7. Frank
    Frank says:

    The people (used loosely) who are occupying land stained fresh with blood, are moralizing against their leader.
    It would be funny, if there wasn’t the top in unbearable human misery involved.

Comments are closed.