UK’s Top-Down, Undemocratic Revolution
Charlie Downes of Rupert Lowe’s Restore party has been doing some good work, as is proved by the fact that he’s been called anti-semitic. He’s 100% right here.
Remember that when Enoch Powell gave his Birmingham Speech in 1968, 74% of the British public agreed with what he had said.
93% said they wanted a drastic reduction in further immigration, while 64% – rising to 74% that November – were in favour of voluntary repatriation.
Look… pic.twitter.com/UKuYSjiSf8
— Charlie Downes (@cfdownes_) September 22, 2026
Look at how the British establishment responded to the will of the people. Britain is in no meaningful sense a democracy.
Ask the rats if they like the exterminator haha. The man’s got the right kind of enemies.
IMPORTANT GRAPH.
CIRCULATE IT WIDELY AMONG BRITISH PEOPLE.
Photocopying is cheap. “Wheatpasting” is cheap.
I would argue that information doesn’t move an apathetic people – it only gives them more subject matter to complain about amongst themselves, down at the local pub, at most.
“The English are a mongrel people, not an Aryan master race”.
True! Nevertheless a cheap clickbait, using such trigger words.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCVCBlk-jk8
These “conservatives” claim they want to ‘conserve’ their culture; no mention of racial value or identity. They are the gatekeepers of “liberalism,” asserting: “Anyone can become a true Briton, but they must play by our rules!” And he himself confirms it: “I believe in the idea of the melting pot.” [sic]
This guy is clearly part of the ruling British establishment. Within that circle, he is said to have committed a few ridiculous blunders—presumably to “sharpen his profile”—for which he quickly backtracked and offered an explanation.
These days, he talks the way the CDU did 20 or 30 years ago, but now leaves it to the AfD (the “German” UKIP). It’s all just a rigged game. No, no one is listening to the deceitful siren songs of you hypocrites anymore; you have failed completely and must be consistently voted out of office and punished for your crimes!
So when Rees-Moog claims that the Brits never marginalized foreign elements, he is deliberately omitting a historically significant fact: His country was the first to expel all Jews by decree. Either he is a liar or a dimwit, and/or he is willfully accepting the risk of being branded an “anti-Semite” once again.
And finally must be said: Rees-Moog accuses foreigners of “making a grave mistake by not becoming Brits, but instead preserving their culture.” One has to imagine this schizophrenic arrogance.
He is clearly trapped in his multiculti-melting-pot delusion and actually believes the nonsense he spouts. How can one expect foreign peoples to shed their identity—to lose it—in favor of one’s own? (It’s anthropologically impossible, if nothing else.)
Did the Brits become Indians in India, Muslims in Arabia, Aborigines in Australia, or Blacks in South Africa? Incidentally, this is another issue he hypocritically glosses over, for as is well known, his “Empire” was not nearly as “tolerant” outside its borders as it was within them.
If Britain is in no way a democracy, why is he wasting his (presumably valuable) time and resources with a party that’s participating in the parliamentary democratic clownshow?
In Britain, we don’t have a system of ‘proportional representation’ like they have on the continent, wherein, in very basic terms, a party that receives 10% of the vote would receive 10% of the representation. Instead, we have this ‘First Past The Post’ electoral system, wherein the party that receives the most votes (even it were only 35% of the total) gets 100% of the representation. This is a mechanism that systematically locks out the fringe parties, unless through some form of unlikely cataclysm, a given fringe party somehow suddenly becomes the most appealing option to voters, in spite of wall-to-wall mass media propaganda encouraging them to vote for ‘system’ parties, and in spite of decades of demoralisation and propaganda tuned to instil a blend of apathy, individual selfishness and ethnic self-loathing that doesn’t go away even in the privacy of the voting booth.
Of course, I agree with Downes’ fundamental principle here. That is why we must stop this silly theatre of parliamentary political parties and switch to proactive ‘frontline’ pressure groups. If one remembers the premise of Machiavelli’s ‘The Prince’, the idea was that if the system couldn’t be changed by replacing it with another system, perhaps a better opportunity for change was in getting the ear of some wealthy prince, who had political sway, and make use of his position to influence new policy, or an end to old policy, by hook or by crook.
In this day and age, in Britain, a modern (and, realistic) equivalent, would entail a group of members united in a common general identity with a clear idea of what is unacceptable in their communities & society bombarding MPs & councillors, businesses, media, etc with meetings, in-person appointments, emails, letters, telephone calls, etc. Not passive ‘protests’ or ‘demonstrations’ (always a ludicrous waste of time and energy that the state love to see!), but direct, targeted, focussed actions that deal with individual issues, one by one. Organised Jews and their goy Leftist lackeys have been successfully doing this for decades, all over White countries while our ‘activists’ were busy handing out useless bits of paper and putting silly little stickers on lamp-posts.
You may recall what happened in Birmingham in 2019 when the parents of Muslim children effectively operated as a pressure group in order to prevent their children from being indoctrinated with LGBT propaganda. Of course, they weren’t a formal pressure group driven by a bigger political agenda, but united by their Arabic/semi-Arabic/non-White racial identity and their Muslim faith, they operated as one. In the long run, with that particular grievance, they were not successful. But they certainly showed their teeth. They showed their willingness to protect their own children, their collective will-to-live.
The only stumbling block to the creation and successful operation of such a pro-White British pressure group is the deeply-rooted stultifying apathy that the native Britons are stricken with. This is why we don’t see the kind of actions like that which occurred in Birmingham 7 years ago from native Britons. Somehow, we need to revive our collective will-to-live, as a race.
The English are not “mongrels”.
>while 64% – rising to 74% that November – were in favour of voluntary repatriation
LOL. What is being in favour of “voluntary repatriation” even supposed to mean? Did the remaining 36(26)% believe “No, we must not let these foreigners get out of our country so easily! Who’s going to enrich our (((culture))) and (((economy)))?!” or what? This reminds me of Keith Woods and his peddling of “remigration” in his “Proposals For A New European Union,” in which the only immigrants deported are those on welfare and criminals, while others would have “voluntary return programmes […] supported by bilateral agreements and financial incentives.” To be fair, further in the text he maybe hints at not-so-voluntary measures: “Eventually, European nations will have to come up with greater incentives to encourage migrants — including second and even [!!!] third generation ones — to relocate, and here again, a strongly aligned European Union will be important to coordinate best practice on this and defend its legitimacy on the world stage.” I’m not that much opposed to him, just remarking how utterly pathetic and ridiculous all of this is. In a liberal democracy, you have no nation, community, or society, only a collection of self-interested individuals with a membership in a special economic zone. Not to blackpill or discourage, but: EVROPA is dead, “the people” were mostly complicit and deserve all of this and more, we need to seriously consider and prepare for living in a majority non-White European liberal democracies.
What about in a social democracy?