Race Is Real

Science and common sense have long since disproved most of the dogmas of the dominant culture of Semitic correctness. But the will for power being stronger than reason and reality, the Jews and their non-Jewish allies persist in promoting their false ideas without any concern for the consequences.

Take race for example, how many times have you heard that races do not exist, that race is a social construct, a category of the mind, that every person, regardless of colour, is the same as every other person, that we are all one in Christ Jesus? So, let’s be colour-blind and for the sake of egalitarianism let’s join hands and sing along with Michael Jackson: “It don’t matter if you’re black or white!”

So don’t be surprised if we see mixed-race couples everywhere, race-mixing encouraged by deceitful propaganda works!

In the United States, since the 1950s, approval of interracial marriages has risen from 5% to 80% (Gallup, 2007). Their percentage has tripled in thirty years (Pew Research Institute, 2012). It’s even worse in England, where nearly half of English people born African-Caribbean would have a partner from a different ethnic group (Bland, 2005), and where mixed-race children under the age of ten would outnumber black children by two to one (The Economist, February 10, 2014). According to geneticist Steve Jones, “we are seeing miscegenation leading to considerable genetic change in London,” where “almost half of the population is not of European origin.”[1]

If everyone is the same under the skin, why bother? Let’s mix, let’s get married. Long live the mixture of colours! It was United Colours of Benetton, remember, one of the first to promote this idea. There was also Jewish director Stanley Kramer’s movie Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner… starring the charming Sidney Poitier, whom every parent would want as a son-in-law. More recently, there was the Jewish producer Romain Rojtman’s movie Serial (Bad) Weddings (Qu’est-ce qu’on a fait au Bon Dieu? What Have We Done to the Good God?) a hilarious film that makes you want to give your daughter’s hand in marriage to the first Chinese man you see.[2]

Always ahead of his time, in 2014, Jewish globalist Jacques Attali, the advisor to several French presidents, saw emerging, beyond the chaos that the mixture of races could sow “the promise of a planetary miscegenation, of an Earth hospitable to all travellers of life.”[3]

Well, I am sorry to disappoint these dangerous dreamers such as J. Attali and Catholic intellectual Dr. E. Michael Jones, but things have changed a lot since Jewish leftist and pseudoscientist Franz Boas first pushed the idea in the 1920s that race is merely a category of the mind or a social construct not found in nature, and that behaviour is strictly shaped by environment. “In political terms,” writes Sam Francis in his article, Franz Boas—Liberal Icon, Scientific Fraud, “if human beings have few or no ‘fixed characters’ and are shaped by the social environment, then what we know as modern liberalism is in business. So is communism, aka Christianity without a God, which also assumes that human beings can be transformed by manipulating the social environment.”[4]

Then there was the enormous influence of Noam Chomsky’s theory of language which claimed, according to Canadian professor Dr. Ricardo Duchesne, “that the general principles underlying the structure of particular languages across the world, the rules which determine the form of their grammar, in such languages as English, Turkish, Yoruba, or Chinese, are indistinguishable in their degree of sophistication.” Chomsky’s goal, notes Dr. Duchesne, “was to offer a theory of language consistent with the ideological claim that all humans are genetically equal, in order to encourage the integration of non-White races in the West and make Whites feel there was nothing special about their cultural achievements, by reducing all languages down to their lowest common denominator.[5]”

Truth be told, no geneticist or anthropologist worthy of the name would dare say today that races do not exist, that we are all equal, and that behaviour is mostly shaped by the environment. As Wiktor Stoczkowski, director of studies at the École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS) and researcher in social anthropology at the Collège de France, says:

Until the beginning of the 2000s, population genetics, which was then in vogue, seemed to demonstrate that human races do not exist. The situation changed at the beginning of the 21^st century, with the invention of new methods for exploring the human genome.[6]

Thus, if we are equal before God and the law, we are not at all equal before disease and medicine. As a consequence of inbreeding (endogamy), the Jewish race, for example, is plagued by some 40 typically Jewish diseases such as Tay-Sachs, Gaucher, Muco-lipidosis IV, and Niemann-Pick; the prevalence of breast and ovarian cancer is moreover particularly “racist” in this population.[7] Prostate cancer is “racist” in that it strikes Blacks three times more often than other races. Similarly, the cholesterol drug rosuvastatin is “racist” against Chinese, Vietnamese, Japanese, Koreans, and Filipinos because these races, which are part of the Asian sub-species, formerly known as the “yellow race,” react very badly to this drug. Finally, BiDil, a drug for heart failure, is also “racist” because it is the first drug to be reserved for only one category of human beings that of Blacks. Blacks themselves have been the first to call for race-specific studies and clinical trials, as reactions to drugs vary from one subspecies to another, and even from one race to another.[8]

The reason that disease and drugs act differently on different human races is because races exist and are genetically different. This is not an invention of racists who want to introduce discrimination between men, but a scientifically demonstrated reality. And this biological difference is not limited to drugs and diseases.

As Robert Plomin, the world’s leading expert in behavioural genetics, has shown, heredity also plays a major role in behaviour, intelligence, and cognitive abilities in general. Differences in DNA can even be used today to predict a person’s psychological traits, its chances of success in school and in life. More importantly, Plomin has shown that nothing changes the genetic predispositions we inherit.[9]^, [10]  If you have no musical talent, no education will make you a Mozart. John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are wrong: man is not a blank slate at birth on which one can write whatever one wants, provided that the social circumstances are appropriate.[11] Not just anyone can be an engineer… nature is much stronger than we are![12]

On the subject of racial differences, here is what the honourable Canadian scientist J. Philippe Rushton says:

For the past twenty years, I have studied the three major races of Orientals (East Asians, Mongoloids), Whites (Europeans, Caucasoid), and Blacks (Africans, Negroids). What I’ve found is that in brain size, intelligence, sexual behaviour, fertility, personality, maturation, life span, crime and family stability, Asians fall at one end of the spectrum, blacks fall at the other end, and whites fall in between. Asians are slower to mature, less fertile, and less sexually active, have larger brains and higher IQ scores. Blacks are at the opposite end in each of these areas. Whites fall in the middle, often close to Asians. I’ve shown that this three-way pattern is true over time and across nations, which means that we can’t ignore it.[13]

The truth is that not all races and individuals are interchangeable. There are indeed more competent races and individuals within races who are more intelligent than others, more docile or more genetically inclined to violence and crime.[14]^, [15]^{, [16],} [17] This is obvious to most serious researchers and people who deal with racial reality on the ground, so why deny it?

Even Jewish scientists, who are usually on the frontline defending racial denial and egalitarianism, are forced to admit, albeit reluctantly,[18] that racial reality and inequality can no longer be denied. Dr. David Reich, for example, Professor of Genetics and Professor of Human Evolutionary Biology at Harvard Medical School, one of the most foremost scientists studying ancient DNA, says the following:

I have deep sympathy for the concern that genetic discoveries could be misused to justify racism. But as a geneticist I also know that it is simply no longer possible to ignore average differences among “races.” Groundbreaking advances in DNA sequencing techniques have been made over the last two decades. […] I am worried that well-meaning people who deny the possibility of substantial biological differences among human populations are digging themselves into an indefensible position, one that will not survive the onslaught of science. […] It will be impossible — indeed anti-scientific, foolish and absurd — to deny those differences. [19]

Since inequality is a law of nature written into our genes, you are not going to make it go away by miscegenation, affirmative action, and dumbing down educational outcomes. Instead, you are going to undermine the most intelligent and most deserving, and by doing so, weaken society, make it less competitive and impoverish it in every way.[20]

Here is what a group of authors specializing in this field has to say about this:

It appears that the advocates of the essential determination of ability by environment or “culture alone” are above all ideologues locked into their false ideas, indifferent to the repeated lessons of experience, always ready to implement policies that are fraught with all sorts of frustrations for the races concerned (in the United States, above all, Whites and Blacks); policies that inevitably result in a catastrophic mix of loosely controlled welfare chaos, dystopian effects for the population as a whole, and totalitarianism through invasive state intervention, as if to obliterate all traces of what a free and orderly society is.[21]

In Brazil, for example, one of the world’s most racially mixed countries, violence, recidivist crime, and poverty, are the norm. In fact, the most racially mixed countries are among the most chaotic in the world. Why on earth would we want to emulate them? Instead, let’s emulate the most racially homogeneous countries like China, Japan, South Korea, and Malaysia, countries with the highest security and average standard of living in the world. There is no country in the world where miscegenation has reduced inequality, communitarianism or xenophobia the littlest bit.[22]

The public ignores these facts, which are supported by renowned scientists such as Henry Garrett, Arthur Jensen, J. Philippe Rushton, Richard Lynn, Charles Murray, Richard J. Herrnstein, and Ricardo Duchesne because they are obscured by the ruling globalist authorities, the media and other social agents that have been duped into thinking that races don’t exist. According to journalist John Derbyshire:

The core ideology of our Ruling Class, which citizens contradict at the peril of losing their livelihood, is Race Denialism. Statistical differences in outcomes by race cannot possibly be biological in origin. The only reasons for those differences you may discuss in public are social: poverty, oppression, lack of self-esteem. And in fact, all of those reasons have a single root cause: “systemic racism” on the part of whites towards other races.

Of course, there are at least two problems with this Race Denialism.

Problem one: Half a century of efforts, including massive favouritism towards blacks, expenditures of trillions, and the election of a black president, have made only a slight dent in the differences of outcome.

Problem 2: East and South Asians, who are now richer and more successful on average than whites.

You might therefore think that the evidence against Race Denialism is now so glaringly obvious as to force denialists to some reconsideration—some doubts as to the soundness of their theory.

That, however, would be to underestimate the fanaticism of the Race Denialists.[23]

Root of the Race Denial Fanaticism

There are people, including certain elites, who are genuinely convinced that races don’t exist. This idea has been massively promoted in every cultural institution of society for ages. Like kindhearted John Lennon, they imagine a peaceful future world where love will reign supreme; a world without races, borders, religions, or injustice; a world where all violence will have disappeared and where “all creatures will be reconciled”; a world “where the wolf will live with the sheep, the tiger will rest with the kid; the calf, the young lion, and the ram will live together and a young child will lead them.”

And then there are those who know very well that race is real. They promote race denial in order to make White people accept whole heartily replacement immigration, multicultu-ralism, and race mixing. Their goal is also the Garden of Eden but for completely different reasons outlined by Count Coudenhove-Kalergi, the founder and President for 49 years of the Pan-European Union, the forerunner of the European Union.[24]

The ultimate goal of bringing to Europe and White countries in general, millions of Muslims, Africans, Indians, and Asians, is the forced coordination of all the countries of the world. This will be achieved by mixing the races in order to create a light brown race.

The result will be a population with an average IQ of about 90, a population too stupid to understand anything, but smart enough to work. White countries will never again be competitive in the fight for survival. A culture that is thousands of years old will be destroyed. The “irrational” people who will fight against this mixing of races, and who will resist the global world order, will simply be eliminated in the name of human rights like the Jacobins did in France and the Bolsheviks in Russia.[25]

One Last Thing to Wrap Up the Question of Race!

Liberal pro-pit bull advocate, Anne-Marie Goldwater — who was obviously raised with the fake Boasian idea that races are a social construct — makes several errors in the following citation:

We use derogatory words to identify a certain subgroup of dogs (pit bulls) which does not form a “race.” Like blacks, Latinos, Arabs… these aren’t races. Just like there is only one race, the race of human beings, there is only one “race” of dogs, it’s called dog: Canis lupus familiaris.[26]

First error: The dog is in fact a domesticated subspecies of the wolf, itself divided into more than 450 breeds or variants, i.e., races in humans, easily identified by their morphology (phenotype) and able to predictably produce offspring true to type. No one has ever seen a couple of registered pit bulls such as the American Staffordshire Terrier produce a litter of poodles.

Second error: Breeds in dogs, just like races in humans, are an inescapable reality, and this reality is not limited to appearances, but also concerns behaviour.[27]^, [28]^, [29]^{, [30],} [31]

Third error: Miss Goldwater wrongly assumes that if dogs are breed blind, humans are also race-blind. Contrary to dogs and all domesticated species, humans were in fact naturally selected to recognize those of their race, i.e., breed in animals. So, if you mix a bunch of people from different races, in a city, room, jail, or in a high school cafeteria, for instance, unless they are forced not to do so for ideological reasons, they will eventually live and mingle with those that are genetically similar to them (theory of genetic similarity by Philippe Rushton: people are naturally attracted by people who have similar genes, likes attract likes).

This is not at all the case for dogs in dog parks, for instance, or any other domestic animal. These are Frankenstein animals fabricated by man as opposed to natural selection, they were not selected to recognize their own breed. But wild animals will mingle according to their breed. There are dozens of breeds of ducks, for example, they are all ducks first, but if several breeds find themselves together on a lake for example, they divide naturally into their respective breeds because of natural selection. They evolved in different ecological niches and have developed by selection certain physical characteristics that other ducks of the same breed, for survival reasons, will recognize such as diet, flight patterns, colour of the feathers, wings or head, size of beak, body size, type of call, etc.

The same for humans, as Jean Raspail says in The Camp of the Saints, the phenomenal book in which he predicted, way ahead of his time, the present replacement immigration:

Man has never loved the whole of humanity in one block, all races, religions, and cultures as one, but only those that he recognizes as belonging to his own kind, those of his group, no matter how vast it is. For the rest, he forces himself to love everyone and he has been forced to do so, and in the end, when the evil has been done, there will be nothing left of him.[32]

---

[1] Laurent Obertone, La France interdite : La Vérité sur l’immigration, Ring, 2018, p. 368.

[2] Hervé Ryssen, Satan in Hollywood, Bitchute, 2016.

[3] Cited by laurent Obertone, work cited, p. 372.

[4] Sam Francis, “Franz EEA – Liberal Icon, Scientific Fraud,” VDare, October 14, 2002.

[5] Personal communication from Dr. Duchesne taken from Noam Chomsky, Language and Politics, Black Rose Books, 1988. Apparently, Chomsky’s academic career was completely astroturfed by the media and Jewish nepotism.

[6] Wiktor Stozkowski, L’antiracisme doit-il craindre la notion de race ? Maison des sciences de l’homme (MSH) Alpes, YouTube, October 17, 2018.

[7] Jon Entine, “DNA Links Prove Jews Are a ‘Race,’ Says Genetics Expert”, American Enterprise Institute, May 7, 2012.

[8] Wiktor Stoczkowski, article cited.

[9] Robert Plomin, John Defries, Gerald McClearn and Michael Rutter, Des gènes au comportement : Introduction à la génétique comportementale, adaptation et traduction de la 3^e édition américaine par Patricia Arecchi, Université De Boeck, 1999.

[10] Robert Plomin, Blueprint: How DNA Makes Us Who We Are, Allen Lane, 2018.

[11] Steven Pinker, The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Na-ture, Penguin, 2003.

[12] Edward O. Wilson, On Human Nature, Harvard University Press, 2004.

[13] J. Philippe Rushton, Race, évolution et comportement, Institut de recherche Charles Darwin, 2015.

[14] Helmuth Nyborg, The Scientific Study of General Intelligence: Tribute to Arthur N. Jensen, Elsevier, 2003.

[15] Charles Murray, Human Diversity: The Biology of Gender, Race, and Class, Twelve, 2020.

[16] Arthur Kemp, The War Against Whites: The Racial Psychology Behind the Anti-White Hatred Sweeping the West, Ostara Publications, 2020.

[17] Robert J. Sternberg (editor), The Nature of Human Intelligence, Cambridge University Press, 2018.

[18] Jared Taylor, article cited : “I bet you didn’t think there was anything to mock about ancient DNA, but the main author of the study is a study himself: a study in absurd efforts to make the science of race and genetics conform to egalitarian fantasy. But, so far as I can tell, he is a very good scientist, and even if he’s afraid of where his data lead, I’m not. Science is always on our side.”

[19] David Reich, PhD, Who We Are and How We Got There. Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past, Pantheon, 2018. See also by the same author: “How genetics is changing our understanding of ‘Race,’ The New York Times, March 28, 2018.

Citation taken from Jared Taylor, article cited.

[20] Laurent Obertone, « Les conséquences d’une baisse nationale du QI (chapter 6)”, La France interdite : La Vérité sur l’immigration, Ring, 2018, p. 351 à 374.

[21] Collectif, QI et races : Le Cauchemar des multiculturalistes devant le réel, avec un texte d’Henry Garrett et une présentation des recherches d’Arthur Jensen, J. Philippe Rushton, de Richard J. Herrnstein, de Charles Murray, de Richard Lynn, de Tatu Vanhanen and other authors, Akribea, 2019.

[22] Laurent Obertone, Work Cited, p. 370.

[23] John Derbyshire, “Race Denial Fanatics vs. Law Enforcement, Academic Reality,” The Unz Review, December 12, 2020.

[24] Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, Practical Idealism, Paneuropa Publishing, 1925.

[25] Kerry R. Bolton, The Tyranny of Human Rights. From Jacobinism to the United Nations, Antelope Hill Publishing, 2022.

[26] Thomas Gerbet (September 21, 2016). L’avocate Anne-France Goldwater défend les pitbulls à Longueuil. Radio Canada (site consulted November 12, 2016).

[27] Edward O. Wilson, On Human Nature, Harvard University Press, 2004.

[28] Steven Pinker, The Blank Slate. The Modern Denial of Human Nature, Penguin Books, 2002.

[29] Steven Pinker, Fear of Race Realism and the Denial of Human Differences, Conference on YouTube.com, 2012.

[30] Robert Plomin, Blueprint. How DNA makes us who we are, Allen Lane (Penguin), 2018.

[31] Charles Murray, Human diversity. The Biology of Gender, Race, and Class, Hachette Book Group, 2020.

[32] Jean Raspail, The Camp of the Saints (translated by Norman Shapiro), 1975. A free copy is available on the Internet Archive.