Britain’s Police Are There to Suppress the White Majority

When a significant portion of society loses trust in the police then that society is in serious trouble. In that direction lies the rise of protection rackets and the collapse of a unified society. This is precisely what has happened in the UK since 1999 and the MacPherson Report which accused the police of “institutional racism” based mainly on its mishandling of the murder of a Black teenager in London in 1993. Since 1999, the police have effectively been inculcated with the idea that their purpose is to protect ethnic minorities from the native population, that nothing is worse than “racism,” that any allegation of it must automatically be taken extremely seriously and that, in effect, the White man must be assumed to be guilty. It’s gone so far that I’ve now had my own run in with the UK police.

Two recent examples serve to illustrate the state of the British constabulary. In December 2025 in Southampton, a White student called Henry Nowak was stabbed by a Sikh. The Sikh then rang the police and dishonestly accused Nowak of having made racist remarks. When the police turned up, Nowak was lying on the ground bleeding to death. “I’ve been stabbed,” he mumbled. Such was the police’s contempt for him that the male officer replied, “I don’t think you have, mate” before arresting him and even handcuffing him. The Sikh, who was ultimately convicted of murder, was at no point handcuffed, even when he was eventually arrested.

Film has emerged, taken in June in Birmingham, of a young White man being beaten up by a group of Blacks. The Blacks are seen dispersing as a young, short female police officer rushes in to attack the White man as he gets up from the ground. Clearly disorientated and not knowing it’s a police officer he strikes back, knocking off her hat. She arrests him, adding, “Walk to the fucking car, you dick!” The police initially denied that anything was wrong with this incident—before putting out another press release claiming that the arrestee had been the victim of an assault and they were now looking for the suspects, whom they’d permitted to run away.

If it wasn’t for members of the public filming these things, and putting them on Twitter, we would never know about this police corruption — this Two-Tier Policing, as it’s commonly termed — so it is no wonder that the British government is interested in restricting social media access under the pretence of protecting children from “harmful content.” Studies on the kinds of people who become police officers indicate that they are not very intelligent (their IQ is about average) and that they are relatively high in Narcissistic traits (which would predict their wanting power and authority over people).

One of the ways in which we can expect them to deal with their understandable insecurity about their intelligence and status is to proclaim that they are more “moral” than others; to take the current morality — Woke — and strongly believe it and signal it in order to reassure themselves that they matter. This is precisely what we see with the UK police. In the 1990s, they weren’t trusted by the Black minority and they were widely regarded as “racist.” This has now been completely reversed. They are an arm of the Woke Deep State and are not trusted by White people or, at least, not be politically conservative White people.

In March, my crew and I were filming a documentary in Luton, a thoroughly Islamised part of the UK that birthed Tommy Robinson’s English Defence League. We were at the recently shut down Vauxhall car plant and couldn’t get inside due to Nepalese security guides. A camera man I’d hired sent up a drone. I thought nothing of this as, in my experience, if you’re in a restricted zone for drones — as I once was in Budapest — then they simply won’t fly. Before long, a car turned with three police officers, one of the two females being covered in tattoos. They arrested the cameraman for flying the drone too close to Luton Airport. Worryingly, this means that ex-Communist Hungary has better technology than the UK.

I got chatting to the non-tattooed female officer. She asked what my film was about and I innocently said “the decline of Luton.” It was almost as if, in that moment, a light bulb went on in her indoctrinated brain: decline of Luton = critical of the government = dissident = far right = evil. She asked who I was and I refused to tell her. “That’s a bit evasive,” she said, reflecting the tendency of the less intelligent to misuse high order words. Why wouldn’t I tell her? I responded that, as far as I’m concerned, the police can’t be trusted. “We’re not all like that,” she responded, seemingly personally offended.

After a while she came over and told me that though I had done nothing wrong and I was with someone who’d been arrested and because we were near an airport she had the right to my details and could arrest me if I refused to provide them. Two barristers later told me that this was nonsense and that she was just a corrupt or ignorant police officer. But I provided her with an address and number. When we left, she was the only one of the three who refused to say goodbye to me. She was very annoyed.

The cameraman was interrogated for three hours and a significant part of the interrogation was about me. They wanted my mobile number, which he refused to give, so they could “pass it on.” Would the drone be filming asylum seekers? It turned out we were close to an asylum seeker centre, which explained why there were groups of Black men in track suits wandering around. “We’re trying to help you. You could get in trouble working with this man. He’s far right.”

Clearly, the British police feel that an aspect of their job is political — as with secret police in communist countries. If you are not “on board” with Woke — if there’s even the slightest hint that you dissent — then are an “enemy” of the state, you are “trouble” and information must be gathered on you. Whites are also dangerous and must be heavily policed whereas Blacks are allowed to run riot. As this distrust of the police by conservatives grows, we can expect to see the growth of parallel societies, of the effective breakup of the UK. Certainly, the behavior of the police seems to indicate that the British Establishment a deeply concerned that organised dissent — or even the mere existence of lone dissenters — among the native population might lead to their losing their grip on power.