General

South African Politician Who Called For Killing White Farmers Convicted On Hate Speech Charges

South Africa likely trying to stave off total collapse by appeasing the Americans: “However, after pressure placed on SA leaders by the Trump Administration through sanctions, South Africa is starting to feel the pain and they are rolling over.  Malema has been brought up on charges again and this time he was convicted by an “equality court” for inciting violence through hate speech.”

South African Politician Who Called For Killing White Farmers Convicted On Hate Speech Charges

It was the White House ambush that shocked the world.  A South African delegation headed by president Cyril Ramaphosa arrived in Washington DC with big grins and smug confidence, ready to milk the American taxpayer for even more foreign aid.  What they received instead was thorough embarrassment.

Trump confronted Ramaphosa on the issue of race-based land seizures through the Expropriation Act of 2024, which largely targets white farmers for confiscation (There are 140 race based laws that oppress whites in SA) .  The land is then redistributed to black citizens who often run the farms into the ground. The leader has denied that land confiscation is taking place.  The South African government and the leftist media has spent the better part of the year trying to spin the issue and deny their motives.

When asked by reporters what he could do to convince Trump that there was no threat of “white genocide” in South Africa, Ramaphosa chuckled and shrugged off the accusation, suggesting that Trump had been misinformed.  Trump surprised the leftist political leader with a video montage proving otherwise.

The South African government, dominated by woke political activists, has tried to cover up the targeting of white farmers by race communists for years.  Their efforts to expropriate land from those same farmers sent a clear message that they are in support of the ethnic cleansing of whites.

Trumps montage featured a number of speeches by communist EFF party leader Julius Malema.  Malema represents around 10% of South African voters, but all parties in South Africa are essentially socialist or communist in their ideals and Malema’s sentiments are shared by many of their members.  White conservatives in SA have near-zero representation in the government.  Malema’s chant of “Kill the Boer” (kill the white farmer), is not limited to members of the EFF.

Malema had been brought up on charges of inciting race violence through hate speech before, and was convicted on lesser incidents in 2011.  None of the charges for his genocide chants stuck.  The courts categorized “Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer” as a type of protest song.  It was treated as protected cultural expression rather than what it really was, a call to mass murder.  Malema famously noted:

‘No white man is going to beat me up…You must never be scared to kill. A revolution demands that at some point there must be killing…”

The Home Office said Malema had also made “statements calling for the slaughter of white people [in South Africa] or hinted that it could be an acceptable option in the future”.

However, after pressure placed on SA leaders by the Trump Administration through sanctions, South Africa is starting to feel the pain and they are rolling over.  Malema has been brought up on charges again and this time he was convicted by an “equality court” for inciting violence through hate speech.

It might be the first time that a leftist bureaucratic institution in South Africa has actually punished a leftist group instead of protecting them from prosecution.  The EFF has responded by rolling out one of their token white members to deflect, concocting a story in which Malema led the chants because of a supposed “racist incident” at a high school that occurred years earlier (which did not involve farmers).  In other words, it was the white man’s fault that Malema called for the killing of whites.

The EFF asserts that their actions are in response to “white supremacy”, but that excuse isn’t going to hold water anymore.  The equality court’s ruling justifies Trump’s concerns about anti-white racism in South Africa.  Furthermore, whites only make up around 7% of the population and have no power in government.  A group cannot be “supreme” if they have no power.

It is the leading party, the ANC, and their partners in numerous other socialist parties that have run the nation into the ground.  At this time, South Africa is nearing total collapse, with a 33% unemployment rate and crumbling infrastructure.

This is what happens when leftists are allowed to take power.  The result is an economic implosion with white conservatives and producers used as a convenient scapegoat. South African leaders are clearly not used to this kind of scrutiny.  They have long been shielded from western criticism by the establishment media.

Trump is the first president to put a spotlight on the backwards progressive government and its grotesque mismanagement, and it appears that his efforts are beginning to have an effect.  Not so much in punishing Malema, it is unlikely he will face any real consequences.  Rather, it’s the fact that South Africa has been forced to acknowledge the ethnic hatred of whites as a tangible issue.  It’s a geopolitical win and a win against leftist propaganda.

Announcing the Third Edition of The Culture of Critique: The Political Cesspool 08/30/2025

The Third Edition of The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements will be published by Antelope Hill on September 5. This is James Edwards’ interview from August 30 where we discuss the revision.

Evolutionary psychologist Dr. Kevin MacDonald announces the publication of a comprehensive new edition of his foundational work, The Culture of Critique. This brand-new third edition includes an extensive updated preface in which Dr. MacDonald elaborates on his thesis and methodology, addresses objections that have arisen since the initial publication, and touches on current topics. During this conversation with James Edwards, he details an entirely new chapter on neoconservatism and explains how he has updated previous chapters to provide valuable insights for a new generation of critical thinkers, students of history and psychology, and political dissidents.

Philip Weiss on Israel

Philip Weiss is a Jewish liberal who somehow hopes that the Democrats get real on Israel. He hates Trump and the GOP and champions diversity and “anti-racism. It’s true that the Democrat base hates Israel but the Democrat politicians still toe the line, refuse to talk about Israeli apartheid or genocide, and they continue to rake in donations from Lobby pro-Israel Jewish donors.

The Democrats and the Jewish community are being torn apart over their support for genocide – it’s about time

Tom Friedman has finally reached his limit. The Gaza slaughter is turning Israel into “a pariah state,” so it’s time for the war to stop, he says. The massacre of journalists and other civilians at the Nasser hospital did it.

Friedman says Gaza is tearing apart the Jewish community and the Democrats. “It is … going to rip apart many, many synagogues around the world… between those who feel the need to stand with Israel, right or wrong, and those who simply can’t stand this Israeli government’s awful behavior in Gaza.

“It is also going to rip apart the Democratic Party, between those who are afraid to defy the influential Israeli lobbying group AIPAC, for fear of losing campaign funding to their Republican opponents, and those who just can’t stand it any longer.”

Shop the Free Palestine t-shirt in the Mondoweiss store!

Friedman is right on both counts, though he’s got the wrong attitude.

Yes, the Jewish community is f***ed for as far as the eye can see – and it should be. Israel’s racist aggression is at last dawning on the Jewish mainstream. Young Jews are shocked and determined to find out — How-and-why did generations of the leading Jewish organizations support the false idol of Israel through cycle after cycle of ethnic cleansing? Nothing will save the Jewish community from this accounting for another generation or two. It’s about time

As for the Democratic Party– we need the Democratic Party to defeat Trumpism. But the Democratic Party is also f***ed as far as the eye can see.

For good reason. There is a cancer on the Democratic Party, its blind advocacy for Israel, and nothing Zionists, even liberal ones, say about the occupation will fix that. Polling shows that the base hates Israel (and so do lots of other Americans). The party bosses love Israel.

Kamala Harris’s bent-knee support for Israel in the midst of a genocide clearly played a role in her loss last year. This was proven by Zohran Mamdani’s stunning victory in the NY mayor’s primary in June, up against $25 million in Cuomo’s warchest, when the assemblyman mobilized an army of the young because he was unafraid to say genocide and apartheid.

The Democratic Party is screwed until it can

  • Denounce genocide
  • Stop avoiding the word apartheid
  • Stop squelching the moral voices of the party with false antisemitism charges.
  • Give a space to the overwhelming majority of Democrats who hate genocide, and to the Palestinian voices such as Noura Erakat and Mahmoud Khalil, or Jewish voices like Medea Benjamin and Norman Finkelstein who say Israel is behaving like Nazis.

The Democratic Party is screwed so long as it accepts AIPAC at any level. It is screwed so long as liberal media take Israeli lies seriously. It is screwed so long as Tom Friedman and David Brooks refer to a racist war criminal as “Bibi” and their editors and hosts think that’s OK.

The party is screwed so long as it cannot make the simple moral declaration that American arms must not be used to murder brave journalists and starving children.

The great moral voice of the left at this moment is Rachel Accurso, the children’s entertainer Miss Rachel. Because she will not shut up about the maiming and killing of civilians, and she does not care about her career. She has made viewers of PBS News Hour cry the world over by showing us the beautiful children hurt by our bombs. We must lift her up.

Our bombs. Democrats in Congress need to start saying just one ounce of what Marjorie Taylor Greene said about American-funded genocide on social media the other day.

“If America was being bombed day and night because of something horrific our government did, and many innocent Americans and American children were being killed and traumatically injured, and we begged for mercy, but the rest of the world said, ‘Americans voted for their government so they deserve it, their government is bad so all Americans are bad, therefore this is what they get and must be done’ And the world was silent to our suffering And our cities and homes were bombed and turned to rubble. And our infrastructure was destroyed, no farms, no grocery stores, no more organized society. And no one helped our injured and hungry children. How would you feel? What would you think? What would you do? This is what is happening to Gaza where in spite of what we have all been told, many innocent people and children are being killed…

“[E]very U.S. tax payer is contributing to Israel’s military actions. I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to pay for genocide in a foreign country against a foreign people for a foreign war that I had nothing to do with. And I will not be silent about it.”

Yes—Greene has said hateful things about Muslims. But she honors the humanity of Palestinians in a way very few Democrats are able to do. Why? Because of the money they get from the Israel lobby, as Friedman says.

Shame on these racist corrupt Democrats. They should be following the leadership of Miss Rachel, who day after day is putting herself on the line for the sake of children starving to death thanks to American weapons.

Then they’d have a political party again.

We need some clarity and leadership among liberals:

If you are going to talk about the horrors of the West Bank – as Ira Glass did for an hour on This American Life — and not say the word “apartheid” once – a word every human rights organization has said — you are useless. (If the Dems had listened to Jimmy Carter on apartheid nearly 20 years ago rather than shutting him down, the genocide would not be happening.)

If you are going to say that the killing was tolerable so long as Israel backs a two-state solution – you are just being racist. (“Palestinian civilians are being killed by the dozen almost daily as the inevitable spillover” of a “just war for Israeli survival and an attempt to produce a better Palestinian partner in Gaza.” — Friedman)

If you are going to offer apologetics for genocide, you are useless. “As I’ve said before on the show, there is no country in the world with a capable military that would not have responded to something like October 7 with unfathomable force” – Ezra Klein. This is the argument the Myanmar government makes against the Rohingya.

If you are going to talk about the horrors of Gaza and not call for an end to American weapons for the genocide, then you are useless.

This has to be the bare minimum. Stop arming war criminals who kill children. Americans will sign up for your party. Ask Mamdani.

While we’re at it, let’s honor the campus protesters. They put their futures on the line, and some paid with their Ivy League degrees, for a simple principle: we don’t want our institutions to support a genocide. Stop smearing them as antisemites.

If you can’t stand up for children and journalists in the bomb sights, if you can’t separate your politics from a genocide because the Zionist community has given you big campaign contributions, then you are deservedly screwed.

There’s only one way to move forward, in dignity and the light.

Napolitano interviews Prof. John Mearsheimer

End of Ukraine war within 6 months; Ukraine is losing badly and suffering enormous casualties; war is much less popular than it was among Ukrainians; Trump has good instincts but little knowledge; Trump was pressured into arming Ukrainians in his first term because of the Russiagate hoax; he is getting little pressure from Republicans to end it, and even though 2/3 of Democrats oppose the war, the Democrat elites are not pressuring Trump to end it. Russia will not agree to a NATO force in Ukraine p0st-war.

Re the Gaza genocide, Israel’s problem is that they want to ethnically cleanse Gaza but no one will take the Gazans; so they keep up the killing. The Israeli army, depending on reservists, is exhausted, and they are recruiting foreign Jews to serve. Napolitano plays two clips from Israeli Foreign Minister Bezalel Smotrich illustrating Israel’s genocidal intent.

Patrick Cleburne: Remembering (Or Reinventing) Katrina

Remembering (Or Reinventing) Katrina, by Patrick Cleburne, September 8, 2009

It is just over four years since Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans and the blog Race Against Time reports that Left Historical Revisionism is in full swing:

ABC News Alleges Band Of White “People Hunters” Killed Innocent Blacks Following Hurricane Katrina Sunday September 6 2009

ABC News is using the four year anniversary of Hurricane Katrina to spread the rumor that vigilante bands of white “people hunters” roamed the streets of Algiers Point (“a historically white enclave”) in the days after the hurricane hit looking for innocent black people to kill.

Katrina was of course a tremendous PR disaster for America’s Black elite and their political patrons. For several days until the MSM’s Commissars recovered, the country saw extensive footage of the collapse into savagery and incompetence of a major US city, stemming from the failings of the city’s black political leadership and the weaknesses of their favored constituents. As Steve Sailer put it the problem was:

the combination of social and governmental incompetence at local, state, and federal level—and unmentionable racial reality…

What you won’t hear, except from me, is that “Let the good times roll” is an especially risky message for African-Americans. The plain fact is that they tend to possess poorer native judgment than members of better-educated groups. Thus they need stricter moral guidance from society

In contrast to New Orleans, there was only minimal looting after the horrendous 1995 earthquake in Kobe, Japan—because, when you get down to it, Japanese aren’t blacks. For example, the per capita imprisonment rate for Asian-Americans is about 1/30th that of African-Americans.

VDARE.com is particularly proud of our Katrina coverage. We did not flinch—unlike others—from facing the racial angle: nor did we repress our writers: unlike National Review. And I am delighted to say we were honored by a big time freak out by Pod the Lesser.

But now the Left Establishment has reached back into the Memory Hole in an attempt to salvage the situation. They probably could, were it not for the Internet. As A Race Against Time notes and documents

In reality, blacks were underrepresented among the dead. While the population of the disaster area was 61% black and 36% white, blacks only accounted for 51% of the deaths. 44% of those killed were white. The fact is, it was whites who were especially in danger of being victimized in the hurricane’s aftermath.

One of his correspondents supplies further evidence:

DailyKenn.com said… Let’s remember, from the European press . . .

Britons tell of Superdome horror

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-361088/Britons-tell-Superdome-horror.html

Britons return to tell of anarchy in Superdome

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1497685/Britons-return-to-tell-of-anarchy-in-Superdome.html

Britons evacuated from Superdome due to black-on-white violence

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4207252.stm

New Orleans — the ideal place for Britons to get shot

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article563500.ece

while an as-yet unremoved comment on the ABC News story gets to the point:

Enter the first Black Attorney General and the FBI. The Lord works in mysterious ways… ITWARZ

ARAT further reports

The allegation that racially-motivated murders took place in Algiers Point is being publicized by A.C. Thompson, a reporter with ProPublica. Although ProPublica is ostensibly a non-partisan investigative journalism organization, it was founded by, and continues to be primarily funded by, Herb and Marion Sandler, who also fund a number of left-wing organizations such as ACORN and MoveOn. Click here to watch an unedited version of the infamous SNL bailout skit from last fall where the Sandlers appear above the caption “People who should be shot”; the Sandlers appear at the 5 minute mark.

Propublica is in effect a subsidy to the Left media, financing the development of stories it then encourages the MSM to use—similar, but alas more lavishly than the VDARE.com strategy.

Congratulate A.C.Thompson.

Herb and Marion Sandler were of course the perpetrators of the Golden West S&L fiasco, a major contributor to the Minority Mortgage Meltdown mess. Having palmed their poisoned chalice off on the yokels at Wachovia Bank (subsequently ruined by the transaction), they are now investing a large slice of their loot in efforts to damage American whites. The original Saturday Night Live Sandler skit (censored from the re runs) is well worth watching. As A Race Against Time says, they appear at the 5 minute mark

Fake News Replaced by Fake ‘Experts’: How To Think Like a Journalist

The new method of journalism is to wake up, scratch yourself, announce this is what I think and then find someone who agrees with you to cite as an “expert.” This honorific is generally given either to slobbering simpletons, like John Brennan, or anonymous nobodies on the left. If you see “expert,” you should assume the person is not an expert, and probably not even a person.

Here’s how to do a story on “water isn’t wet” in under 40 minutes:

Get a college professor on the phone.

Hello. I’m from The New York Times and I’m looking to quote an expert saying water’s not wet.

That is correct, water is not wet.

Why?

Because it isn’t.

Is this something you’ve studied?

Oh my gosh — I’m a world-renowned expert.

To your editor: I’ve got an expert saying water isn’t wet.

Do you have more than one?

Throw a rock out the window, hit someone. Hey! Sorry about the rock. I’ve got a question for you. Is water wet? Yes? Ask the guy next to you. Got it, perfect.

Headline: “Water Not Wet, Experts Say.”

Nowhere is the explosion of phony experts more annoying than in the bloated ranks of foreign policy hacks. It’s as if the world decided to solve the problem of “elite overproduction” by creating a full employment program for them as government bureaucrats and quotation providers.

Thus, a recent Times article accused Donald Trump of “Flying Blind” by stripping the government of high-quality intelligence experts, horrifyingly, just as he’s trying to end the Russia-Ukraine war. Instead of relying on experts, as other (obviously better) presidents have, Trump, the Times reports, “has taken a different approach …: He’s fired them.”

Meaning he will not be deferring to people whose sole objective in life is being quoted in the Times. Without losing accuracy, the cited authorities could all be identified as professors of Trump-Hating.

To prove what a nightmare Trump’s housecleaning is, the Times quotes the very sort of experts he’s sidelining. Evelyn N. Farkas at the McCain Institute in Washington, DC (very confidence-inspiring) said of the expert-less administration: “They’re flying blind without the expertise.” Amazingly, that’s just what the Times thought.

Because only true “expertise” could get us to spend $2.313 trillion over two decades to turn Afghanistan into the exact same country it was when we invaded — except with an extra $7.1 billion in U.S.-made weapons — or, in a mere three years, cost us $180 billion and tens of thousands of dead Ukrainians in order to give Vladimir Putin an even stronger hand than when he first invaded. (Hey, maybe we’re getting better at this!)

New definition of “expert” updated by me 10 seconds ago: “Someone who agrees with us, preferably who’s been repeatedly proved egregiously wrong.”

Farkas says the Trump rejects “have seen all the intelligence relating to Vladimir Putin’s intentions. They have spies on the ground. They know all kinds of information that’s gained through technical means.” OK, but eventually we’re going to need an example of something these guys caught that won’t be caught now. Otherwise, it’s more like: “Titanic shareholders strip their back-office of iceberg experts.”

The Times is especially alarmed that Trump has “purged experts” from the National Security Council. Yes, the same NSC that is so chockablock with experts that Joe Biden added a special envoy on climate. Please God, tell me Trump didn’t fire that guy. Because whenever I worry about keeping America safe from deranged autocrats, my first thought is, “How’s the weather?”

As if Trump is nursing some ancient grudge, like the Greeks and the Turks, the Times describes the pink-slipped NSC experts as those who worked on the “nearly decade-old investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.”

Of course, the reason it’s a “decade-old” is that these nincompoops have been noodling almost nothing else for the past decade, rather than, say, wondering if Hamas had anything up its sleeve. It took them 10 years to prove that the Russians did not steal the 2016 election. It only took me about 20 minutes.

We all should hold a grudge against those guys.

Where did the Russian interference yarn come from, anyway? It was cooked up by Barack Obama’s director of national intelligence and admitted perjurer James Clapper to distract from the cache of DNC emails released by Wikileaks — no connection to Russia — that were extremely embarrassing to Hillary Clinton. That’s what highly trained expertise gets you.

The Times’ final water-is-not-wet expert is Marc Polymeropoulos, a former CIA officer, meaning he knows less about what’s going on in the world than anyone who was not a CIA agent. Polymeropoulos, according to the Times, said “Mr. Trump did not want to hear intelligence reports about Russia’s bad acts” and blamed Laura Loomer for the expert bloodbath.

Amazingly, that was just what the Times thought! Has The New York Times ever attributed expertise to anyone it disagrees with?

Put aside the fact that Polymeropoulos was a “long-time Middle East specialist” — and there hasn’t been a ruffled feather over there since then. Also put aside his claim that after living all over the world, when he finally went to Russia in December 2017, he “experienced panic and helplessness for the first time.” Sounds very stable and reassuring.

This guy claims he has “Havana Syndrome,” a well-known psychosomatic hysteria. It’s the male version of long-haul COVID.

How is Trump going to function without high-level experts like these?

COPYRIGHT 2025 ANN COULTER