General

Tucker Carlson on Trump Threats to Iran

/2 Comments/in /by

Tucker Carlson sends out an email with current news stories, including one today on Trump’s threats to bomb Iran. What’s a bit surprising, given Carlson’s support for Trump, is this criticism of the Trump administration: “While the president’s administration has made meaningful efforts to achieve peace in Ukraine, it continues to maintain a blindspot when it comes to Iran. Its rhetoric toward the Ayatollah-run nation, including threatening to bomb its homeland, has increased tension between the White House and Tehran, and Washington’s continued and unconditional backing of Israel has led to U.S. service members being thrust into harm’s way at the hands of the Houthis in Yemen.” Such a sentiment is not present in the Fox News article that the comment links to.

Candace Owens goes off on the Israel Lobby

/7 Comments/in /by

Wokeness at UBC: Bicycles for BIPOCs and a punctuation-free Ph.D. dissertation

/6 Comments/in /by

University of British Columbia seems to be on the far end of super-woke. I get emails from someone monitoring the situation: ‘

Bikes for BIPOC

This is a bike redistribution program for UBC students who are Black and/or Indigenous and/or People Of Colour to promote access to bikes as a mode of autonomy, safe and reliable transportation, health and joy. The aim of this program is to support BIPOC students and address inequalities of material wealth and access to transportation. We approach bike distribution with a Racial Justice lens and seek to provide accessible transportation to folks who are typically not prioritized in the bike industry.

Why an Architect Wrote a 52,438-Word Dissertation With No Punctuation

An architect pursuing a doctorate at the University of British Columbia wrote his 149-page, 52,438-word dissertation without any periods or commas. Patrick Stewart, 61, who belongs to the Nisga’a, a group of indigenous people in British Columbia, told Canada’s National Post that his dissertation, entitled “Indigenous Architecture through Indigenous Knowledge,” was designed to raise awareness about “the blind acceptance of English language conventions in academia” and to make a statement about “aboriginal culture, colonialism.” And he claimed there is “nothing in the (UBC dissertation) rules about formats or punctuation.” When he defended his punctuation-free dissertation, the examiners accepted it unanimously.

Macron and Corruption: Judge in Le Pen’s case is close ally of Macron

/3 Comments/in /by

The normalization of banning political opposition will go nowhere good.

Robert W Malone MD, MS

Emmanuel Macron is a lame-duck president without a parliamentary majority. He has turned France is another EU-corrupted government – stopping free and fair elections by use of the courts.

Macron’s judges took claimed finance violations and turned it into a criminal complaint to bar his populist opponent from being able to challenge him. Presidential candidate Marine Le Pen’s staffers were being paid by the EU to work with MPs. But they commingled work processes and worked for French MPs too. This is not embezzlement. This is a finance violation. It should never have ended up in a court of law.

Macron is evil — he arranged for this court verdict by choosing a close ally as the judge of Le Pen’s court case. Marine Le Pen, who heads the National Rally (RN) party was convicted of embezzlement and barred from running for public office for five years, sentenced to four years in prison, with two years suspended and two under house arrest, and was fined €100,000 ($108,000).

To be clear, this court case was based on a technicality — the EU claimed she used money meant to hire one category of employee, and instead, they claim she and other party officials hired people to work on national issues. The EU claims that money intended for European Union parliamentary aides was used to instead pay for staff who worked for the national party issues — between 2004 and 2016. So, just like the lawfare used against Trump, they used finance violations that mainly occurred over two decades ago to take down the opposition party to Macron.

The decision effectively removes her from the 2027 presidential race, where she was seen as a leading candidate. So broad are the political implications that most of Le Pen’s opponents said the Paris court had gone too far.

This is the same France that has imprisoned the CEO of Telegram because he permits free speech.Macron has become a dictator.

We can expect large political protests in France in the coming months – but it is doubtful that they will make a difference.

Either arresting conservative political opponents or banning them from running for public office has been normalized. It has recently happened in Brazil and Romania.

In Germany, similar tactics are being used. Except there,  they are just trying to ban the entire conservative Alternative for Germany (AFD) party outright.

Germany’s constitution allows the Federal Constitutional Court to ban parties deemed to “seek to undermine or abolish the free democratic basic order.” With this in mind, the courts and the deep state have already begun to find ways to ban the AfD from elections. The German parliament is set to debate an application for a ban on the AfD in a plenary session for the first time next week.

In the United States, liberals and liberal courts tried to stop President Trump from running for office. In December 2023, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Trump was ineligible to run for president in Colorado after ruling that he engaged in an insurrection. The U.S. Supreme Court later overturned this decision, remember that it was only due to the intersession of the Supreme Court that these antics came to an end for the last round of elections. We can be sure that tactic will be used again in future elections.

Now, these same liberals are using lawfare to stop President Trump’s political agenda. They have flooded lower courts with liberal judges, who are using their positions in ways not intended by the US Constitution to impede Trump’s foreign and domestic policies.

Be careful what you wish for:

In Romania, my friend George Simion, who is conservative, has now risen to the top of the polls after the presidential candidate Călin Georgescu was banned from holding office.

The people in Romania know what a totalitarian government looks like and they are not having it. If Călin Georgescu can’t run, the people will transfer their votes over to the candidate that Călin Georgescu endorses, and in this case, that is George-Nicolae Simion.

The graphic above shows that Georgescu received 22% of the vote in the fall election and Simion received 13% of the vote. For a total of 35% of the vote total. In a poll conducted in March 2025, Simion has picked up most of Georgescu’s support and is polling at 30%, putting him well in the lead for the May 4 presidential election.

Le Pen and the Guillotine of Democracy

/1 Comment/in /by

Constantin von Hoffmeister at Eurosiberia:

Marine Le Pen has been banned from running in the French presidential election in 2027. That is the headline — no metaphor, no nuance, just the hard blade falling. They have not defeated her in the arena of debate or vision. They have simply locked the gates. The queen is removed from the board while the game continues, rigged, trembling with fear of her return. This is not just a courtroom. It is a theater of ritual execution where she stands condemned. A drama unfolds, stripped of the honesty of tragedy. The victim is more than a political figure. She embodies a nation’s revolt. The French courts, acting as instruments of a supranational entity, have declared their verdict: Marine Le Pen, guilty of daring to resist. They allege that between 2004 and 2016, she “misused” approximately €4.5 million by employing assistants who purportedly served her party, the National Rally, rather than engaging in “legitimate parliamentary work.” Yet, the true specter haunting this proceeding is sovereignty itself.

The stripping of her passive voting rights is no minor legal footnote. It is the deliberate dismantling of the people’s right to choose their leader. The timing reveals a calculated act of sabotage, targeting those who challenge the prevailing liberal-leftist orthodoxy. The judiciary intervenes precisely when national stakes are high and the challenger articulates the voice of the people. Le Pen bleeds where relics remain inert. Her appeal is anticipated, yet such appeals often reverberate as futile gasps in chambers where verdicts are preordained.

We have witnessed this pattern before. The name Georgescu lingers like smoke in the annals of political betrayal. Recall him — the Romanian patriot who dared to wield the people’s language, demanding that Brussels bow to Bucharest. And beyond Georgescu, the image of Codreanu — the Captain — stirs in the shadows, a martyr whose memory still strikes fear in the heart of the bureaucratic empire. Georgescu, like Codreanu before him, refused to kneel, and for this defiance he was exiled from the democratic illusion. He stood on the brink of victory until the machinery of the European Union turned against him. Legal instruments were manipulated, bureaucratic paragraphs invoked, and overnight he was erased from an election he was poised to win. No tanks rolled through the streets. The EU required only parchment and procedural cunning. Brussels remained indifferent. Europe consumes its progeny without remorse. Georgescu’s appeal also amounted to naught as everything is manipulated and fake.

They call this “the rule of law.” Yet, in a Union where law bends to ideological whims, it becomes a velvet-covered cudgel. The Eurocrats are untroubled by corruption but unsettled by purity — the kind that speaks of heritage, lineage, and a Europe forged through centuries, not fleeting trends. Le Pen, like Georgescu, transgresses by asserting that identity endures. That France exists beyond mere rhetoric — as land, as border stones, as war memorials, as the aroma of freshly baked bread at dawn in a village untouched by the perversions of modernity.

The real trial unfolds now, everywhere. Do we submit to the tyranny of documents, faceless magistrates, and directives penned in sanitized language? Or do we rise as heretics against their global dogma? Le Pen is more than a name struck from a ballot. She has become a symbol — bruised and defiant. Declaring her unelectable aims to render her unthinkable. Yet thought fights against suppression. If Europe is to experience a renaissance, its heartbeat will resonate through anguish and unvarnished truth.

They may have seized a presidency, but the soul of the continent remains beyond their grasp. That essence cannot be prosecuted. It will not be silenced by legal decrees. The European patriot — like the phoenix rising from ancestral ashes — ascends. Every prohibited ballot, every silenced candidate, fuels the fire. Le Pen’s so-called “political death” marks the opening stanza of the next anthem. This epic will not be broadcast. It will be told in metaphorical catacombs, illuminated by flickering candlelight, and spoken in codes decipherable only by ancient bloodlines.

If you enjoy my writings, please consider purchasing my books Esoteric Trumpism and MULTIPOLARITY!.

Eurosiberia is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

More Gender Lunacy, Financed by Canadian Taxpayers

/5 Comments/in /by

Just when you thought it couldn’t get any weirder, Canadian taxpayers are expected to pay for a vagina for a man who wants to keep his penis. To do otherwise would be to  somehow “endanger his/her[??]  security.” It’s a great complement to today’s feature article by Tobias Langdon, “A Clown Called Chleo: Fetishism, Feminism and the Toxicity of TERFs.” A major theme of Langdon’s article is the hierarchy of leftist lunacy, with the weirdest lunatics having a privileged position. Well, this creature is definitely at the top of the hierarchy.

Ontario resident who wants both a vagina and penis wins public funding for unique surgery

A court has ruled Ontario must pay for a penis-sparing vaginoplasty for a person who identifies as neither fully female nor fully male

Ontario has been ordered to pay for surgery for a resident who is seeking to have a vagina constructed while leaving their penis intact. Denying the procedure would infringe on the person’s Charter-protected right to security of the person, an Ontario court said in its ruling. The unanimous decision by a three-member panel of judges of Ontario’s Divisional Court could expand access to a novel “bottom surgery” for people who identify as non-binary, meaning neither fully male nor fully female.

Ontario has been ordered to pay for surgery for a resident who is seeking to have a vagina constructed while leaving their penis intact.

Denying the procedure would infringe on the person’s Charter-protected right to security of the person, an Ontario court said in its ruling.

The unanimous decision by a three-member panel of judges of Ontario’s Divisional Court could expand access to a novel “bottom surgery” for people who identify as non-binary, meaning neither fully male nor fully female.

The Ontario resident, identified in court documents as K.S., has been locked in a legal battle with the Ontario Health Insurance Plan since 2022, when OHIP denied a funding request to have a penile preserving vaginoplasty performed at a clinic in Austin, Texas.

The surgery, which is not available anywhere in Canada, involves creating a vaginal canal, or opening, without removing the penis.

K.S., 33, was born male but identifies as female dominant and uses a feminine name.

OHIP denied her request for funding, arguing that the procedure is not included on its list of sex-reassignment procedures, and is therefore not an insured service.

K.S. appealed OHIP’s decision to Ontario’s Health Services Appeal and Review Board, arguing that forcing her to have her penis removed would invalidate her identity and be akin to an illegal act of conversion therapy.

Hey, At Least We Bombed Somebody

/4 Comments/in /by

For a totally different angle on the encrypted app story, I thought that instead of discussing how plans for bombing the Houthis were leaked, I’d discuss the bombing of the Houthis.

Including any journalist in a top-secret discussion of war plans demonstrates shocking incompetence. But the fact that National Security Adviser Mike Waltz included The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg — though not technically a journalist — is a big middle finger to President Trump.

Forget that Goldberg is responsible for the disgusting lie — featured nightly on MSNBC — that Trump called American soldiers who died in war “suckers” and “losers.” Both Waltz and Goldberg represent the dominant foreign policy establishment that Trump expressly ran against. Instead of “Make America Great Again,” they think the government’s job is to “Make the Middle East Great Again.”

This train wreck will be a test to see: 1) if Trump has an ounce of self-respect and will fire a national security adviser who has an anti-Trump zealot on speed dial; and 2) whether Trump intends to betray voters on his clearly stated opposition to Forever Wars.

Because right now, his foreign policy team is looking like John Bolton without the ridiculous Wilford Brimley mustache. Since Trump keeps hiring these people, it’s a good time to remind him that, in 2016, he won more primary votes than any Republican in U.S. history (as well as the election) by saying things like this about a war that had a million more justifications than his recent bombing of the Houthis:

Obviously, the war in Iraq was a big, fat mistake. … We spent $2 trillion, thousands of lives … George Bush made a mistake. We can make mistakes. But that one was a beauty. We should have never been in Iraq. We have destabilized the Middle East.

So why does Trump keep surrounding himself with tinhorn cowboys who think it’s America’s responsibility to drone, bomb, invade and occupy other countries whenever and for whatever reason they want?

The one person in that chat within shouting distance of Trump’s idea to put America first was Vice President JD Vance, who briefly interrupted the drums of war to say:

I think we are making a mistake. 3 percent of US trade runs through the Suez. 40 percent of European trade does. There is a real risk that the public doesn’t understand this or why it’s necessary. The strongest reason to do this is, as POTUS said, to send a message.

Naturally, The Wall Street Journal put Vance’s remarks through the Murdoch 2000 computer and came out with an editorial as stupid as it was snarky, claiming that the vice president was being disloyal to Trump. In fact, he was about the only one in that group chat being faithful to Trump’s avowed policy.

The single counter argument given by the warmongers was “deterrence,” the endlessly malleable excuse for killing anyone, anywhere, anytime.

While I understand the satisfaction of having random bad guys’ heads blown off — and much as we all enjoyed the Israeli exploding pager affair — it’s hard not to notice that incessantly bombing the rest of the world has not made America safer. This is why I strongly support Trump’s decision to remove Secret Service protection from his first term’s version of Waltz: Bolton and Mike Pompeo.

First, I want to make clear that, after much careful consideration, I am against Americans being killed by terrorists.

But the reason Bolton and Pompeo received full-time protection was because of their insistence that Trump assassinate Qassem Soleimani, a high-ranking Iranian official, in January 2020.

Soleimani was a bad guy, but not nearly as bad as some of our dearest allies, like Jared Kushner’s BFF, Saudi Crown Prince “Bone Cutter” Mohammed bin Salman. And he was in the process of meeting with an Iraqi official — at the U.S.’s request — to strike a truce with Saudi Arabia. And he was beloved by the Iranian people, who credit him — not Trump — with wiping out ISIS.

But assassinating Soleimani made Bolton and Pompeo feel like Masters of the Universe. Who cares if they stirred up a hornet’s nest in a not-especially rational part of the world? Iraq was enraged, Iran vowed retaliation, and Americans in the region were warned to leave because of the inevitable reprisal. No Secret Service protection for them!

What is usually enraging about reckless policies that endanger innocent Americans is that the people who implement them remain comfortably insulated from their effects. No-bail laws, open borders, Obamacare, gun control, TSA, actually having to watch Nicolle Wallace — somehow the people responsible for these policies always have a work-around.

Similarly, self-imagined geopolitical chess players can carelessly risk American lives by ticking off the rest of the world and inviting payback, secure in the knowledge that they, personally, will have 24-7 Secret Service protection for the rest of their lives.

Instead of MAGA having to constantly remind Trump what the first “A” stands for, why not incentivize the people who keep dropping bombs on people’s heads to adopt a more humble foreign policy by removing their Secret Service protection?

Trump can be enraging, maddening, frustrating. But like the Coca-Cola recipe, he’s at his best when he sticks to the original formula. We don’t want Trump Lite, “As Inspired By” Donald Trump or Trump-adjacent. He was very clear about what he wanted, he won the presidency, and there’s a good chance he’ll be on Mount Rushmore. There’s no chance Mike Waltz will be.

COPYRIGHT 2025 ANN COULTER