From the German Magazine UN Unabhängige Nachrichten (Independent News) 1/2021) Translated by The Hun.

After 70 years of free democratic governments and state political education work, is democracy so weak, so sick, that its continued existence must be strengthened with billions of taxpayers’ money?

For a long time, more than 100 million euros of taxpayers’ money have been spent annually on political education work by the federal government, the states, and the municipalities. Churches, trade unions, associations, the “leading media” and the well-known television programs participate in this democratic education work.

If “right-wing extremism and racism” have nevertheless actually spread in society to such an extent as is being painted on the wall by the ruling party cartel, the question must be asked as to who is to blame for such developments.

It cannot be the older generation: Nazi education ended in 1945, after which “re-education” began. Whether “re-educated” or not, this generation, due to its age, no longer determines the formation of public opinion, because it is approaching old age.

So, if the younger society is allegedly so permeated by increased “right-wing extremism and racism« that billions are required in the “fight against the right”, no one else is responsible for it than the misguided, anti-people policy of the responsible parties in all areas according to the Merkel motto: “Everyone who is staying here forms the nation.!”

Since March 2020, there has been an special cabinet committee that has set itself the goal of taking measures “against right-wing extremism as well as against racism, anti-Semitism, anti-gypsyism, Muslimophobia, anti-black racism and all other forms of group-based hostility towards people.”

The result is a gigantic economic stimulus package worth 1.1 billion euros for NGOs (non-governmental organizations), various Antifa groups and for a large number of “democratic associations of civil society.”

The members of the cabinet committee, under the leadership of Mrs. Merkel, agree “that the fight against right-wing extremism and racism must be intensified.”

This resulted in a catalog of 89 measures that “takes into account the opinions of representatives of civil society, especially migrant organizations.”

Four main points outline what is causally at stake:

1. Create greater awareness of racism as a phenomenon affecting society as a whole and establish improved state structures in the area of combating right-wing extremism and racism; strengthen cooperation between security authorities, the judiciary, state and civil society agencies and improve the empirical basis;
2. Expand and strengthen prevention against right-wing extremism and racism, anti-Semitism, Muslimophobia and all other forms of group-based hostility in regular structures in all areas of society, including the internet; further develop political education and democracy work;
3. Expand support for victims of racist discrimination and the social environment; effectively protect victims and improve sustainable structures for combating racism;
4. Recognize and value a diverse and equal opportunity society and strengthen equal participation opportunities for people with an immigration background.

These are the demands, some of which are couched in cloak and dagger terms. 75 years after the first wave of re-education, the German people are now to be finally brainwashed with empty phrases.

The term “misanthropy” is perfectly suited to nip any resistance to today’s policies in the bud. Criticism of the unchecked immigration policy, of the Covid measures, of feminism, genderism, globalization, left-wing terrorism, etc. will in future be a case for the Office for the Protection of the Constitution or for “civil society groups.”

In addition to the monstrosity of using such an immense sum of taxpayers’ money quite unabashedly against the political opponent, the damage to the cohesion of society will be incalculable.

Defamation and denunciation will be further opened up by the state — the people will be divided into “good” and “bad.”

Fear of state repression, mistrust, resentment and discord will characterize our lives. To give you a foretaste of what is to come, we have compiled the most important points of the 89-measure “catalog.”

Even if it seems tedious, it is worth reading every word carefully:

Catalog of Measures of the “Cabinet Committee to Combat Right-Wing Extremism and Racism.”

Federal Ministry of the Interior, for Construction and Home Affairs

No. 1 Adaptation of constitutional protection law with introduction of a legal basis for source telecommunication surveillance for the federal intelligence services (amendment of the Federal Constitutional Protection Act BVerfSchG)

No. 2 Antiziganism [Anti-Gypsyism] — Establishment of a national contact point within the framework of the EU Roma Strategy 2030

Independent monitoring and information center for racist, especially anti-Gypsy attacks

Evaluation of policies and strategies to combat antiziganism in cooperation with civil society

No. 4 Launch of a new prevention program “Democracy on the Net”

No. 7 Expansion of the intercultural and diversity-oriented opening of the public service (diversity strategy), e.g., through

– Reviewing selection procedures for the civil service

– Targeted campaigns to recruit more people with a migration background for the civil service

– Regular survey on diversity/diversity-measures in the public service

No. 10 Report by the Independent Expert Group on Muslim Hostility (UEM) with recommendations for action to combat anti-Muslim hatred and Islamophobic discrimination

No. 11 Preparation and updating of a situation-report on right-wing extremism in security agencies, extension to situation-report on public service as a whole

No. 12 Promoting the political and social engagement of migrant people

No. 13 Research project: Investigation of the everyday life of the police

No. 14 Research funding in the area of Islam/Muslimophobia

No. 15 Research study on everyday racism: development and prevalence of discriminatory acts in civil society, business and industry, and public institutions […]

No. 20 New, further measures within the framework of political education on specific phenomena (anti-Semitism, Muslimophobia, anti-gypsyism, anti-black racism)

No. 21 Program “Anti-racist education” (intensified commitment against racism and other forms of group-related hostility)

No. 22 Strengthening migrant organizations through model projects for qualification (Association Academy for Migrant Organizations), Houses of Resources

No. 23 […] Expansion of cooperation with security authorities in dealing with right-wing extremism, racism and anti-Semitism

No. 25 Increased awareness of racism, anti-Semitism and other forms of exclusion in education, training and continuing education in the public sector

No. 26 Education and training offer for police officers on anti-Semitism sensitization at the House of the Wannsee Conference

Foreign Office

No. 29 Coming to terms with colonialism in an international context:

– Development of joint textbooks (target region Africa, Georg Eckert Institute)

– Expansion of the “kulturweit” volunteer program with Africa as a target region«

No. 31 Strategic communication abroad: dealing with disinformation and conspiracy mythologies from the right spanning populism, anti-Semitism and racism, increasing Germany-abroad funding (DiA)

No. 32 Study on Racism and patterns of exclusion in foreign cultural and educational policy with recommendations for action

Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection

No. 35 Federal government supports further training in the area of right-wing extremism/racism/anti-Semitism in the judiciary (training events at the German Judicial Academy, support for projects of the German Institute for Human Rights)

No. 36 Reformulation of Art. 3 of the Constitution, replacement of the term “race”

– Establishment of an expert working group between Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection (BMJV) and Federal Ministry of the Interior, for Construction and Home Affairs (BMI)

No. 37 Practice-oriented jurisprudential research on law and racism

No. 38 Examination of how the confrontation with Nazi injustice can be achieved in legal training and, if necessary, how this can be ensured by amending the German Judges Act

Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth

No. 47 Sustainable expansion of political youth work in the regular structures of the federal government (child and youth plan – Kinder- und Jugendplan, KJP)

– Expansion of regular structures for political youth education,

– Establishment of nationwide interest groups, including Muslim, migrant and black youth initiatives of Muslim, migrant and black youth initiatives with base funding from the KJP

– Nationwide promotion of extracurricular memorial trips

– Expansion of democratic children’s and youth involvement

No. 52 Improvement of the legal and budgetary framework for the promotion of civil society engagement for democracy, diversity and against extremism. To this end, the BMI and BMFSFJ will promptly develop and then present key points for a law to promote defensible democracy

No. 53 Promotion of projects on the topic of anti-feminism and right-wing extremism

No. 54 Campaign on “Raising Awareness of Prejudice and Everyday Racism” as part of the federal program “LiveDemocracy!”

No. 62 Strengthening work against hate on the Net/digital hate violence, including expansion of the “Hate on the Net” competence center and new model project (with participation of the Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection)

No. 63 Strengthening political education in youth social work

No. 65 Further development of the federal “Live Democracy!” program

– Expansion of local commitment (further partnerships for democracy)

– Improve existing victim and affected person counseling in the federal states the federal states + support of the federal association

– Further development of existing competence centers and networks, e.g., racism against black people, Islam- and Muslimophobia, antiziganism, anti-Semitism, right-wing extremism – incl. expansion of pheno-specific community-based monitorings

– Further development of disengagement and distancing

– Strengthening work against conspiracy ideologies

Federal Ministry of Education and Research

No. 67 Strengthening research on right-wing extremism, racism, anti-Semitism and other forms of group-based hostility (e.g., antiziganism), improving the research data infrastructure and sustainably anchoring the research field at universities. As well as the historical and contemporary reappraisal of the emergence of right-wing extremism and racism.

No. 71 […] Establishment and expansion of concrete projects of reappraisal, documentation and mediation in BKM-funded institutions and at project partners on the topic of colonial history, effects of colonialism and racism as well as dealing with collection items from colonial contexts, especially in museums such as the German Historical Museum and the international lighthouse project Humboldt Forum.

No. 72 “Lighthouse Project”: new type of operational preventive measure: New Start Initiative Cultural Integration, i.e., broadly effective campaigns, solidarity actions and impulse projects of the “Initiative Cultural Integration” with a focus on combating right-wing extremism, anti-Semitism and racism are to be promoted in order to carry out operationally effective cultural activities in a broad societal consensus and network of the state (federal government, states, municipalities) and civil society with major umbrella organizations such as the Central Council of Jews

No. 73 Strengthening media competence, media diversity and media pluralism as a core element of democracy; establishing and expanding prevention projects against hate speech and propaganda, prevention on the Net [i.e., “We want media diversity except any media that allows “hate speech” must be prevented.]

Federal Government Commissioner for Migration, Refugees and Integration

No. 75 Naturalization offensive: shall specifically promote the possibility of naturalization in order to enable well-integrated foreigners who meet legal requirements to participate fully

No. 80 Initiation of dialogue between the federal government, the states and civil society on intercultural diversity in framework curricula and diversity competence in initial and in-service teacher training

No. 83 Supporting municipal concepts and dialogues in dealing with diversity and hostility and strengthening municipal (political) decision-makers through qualification projects in dealing with right-wing extremism and racism

I have a paper that was just published in Mankind Quarterly:

Can Western Church Influence Explain Western Individualism? Comment on “The Church, Intensive Kinship, and Global Psychological Variation” by Jonathan F. Schulz et al., Mankind Quarterly 61, no. 2 (2020): 371-391.

This paper is a critique of a paper by Jonathan Schulz that appeared in 2019 in Science and got quite a bit of publicity. A co-author and likely inspiration for the project is Joseph Henrich, professor and chair of the Department of Human Evolutionary Biology at Harvard and thus is well acquainted with evolutionary perspectives. However, while he acknowledges evolved, genetic influences on human behavior and that cultural changes may result in genetic changes (the classic example is the evolution of genes for lactose tolerance in some populations consequent to utilizing milk from domesticated cattle), he argues that the prime mover of human evolution is culture. In this scenario, there was nothing special or unique about Western populations prior to the Middle Ages, and that indeed, European populations in the year 1000 AD were markedly less advanced than Muslim societies and China. However, around this time the Catholic Church succeeded in imposing its marriage and family policy which essentially “demolished” intensive kinship relations (i.e., kinship deeply embedded within closely related groups, e.g., clans and kindreds with a distinct hierarchy and based on degree of genetic relatedness) commonly found in agricultural societies. Freed of the ties to intensive kinship groups, individuals gradually gravitated to voluntary associations based on common interests, ranging from merchant guilds to religious sects and scientific societies that ultimately gave birth to the modern world. In 2020 Henrich published The WEIRDest People in the World which is based fundamentally on the research presented in the 2019 Science article.

As I note in the abstract, this contrasts with my recently published book Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition: Evolutionary Origins, History, and Prospects for the Future, which proposes that Western individualism, as expressed in the characteristic European marriage system and in a plethora of other cultural expressions, is ultimately the outcome of selection in the ancestral environments of northern Europe and northern Eurasia more widely. This commentary highlights the historical evidence bearing on these alternative explanations for European exceptionalism. The main conclusion is that European individualism, as expressed in kinship structure and social organization, was firmly established before the advent of Christianity.  My paper has 4 sections:

1. Primordial Tendencies toward Western Individualism: the key issue is signs of individualism in the Indo-Europeans and Northern Hunter-Gatherers that make up the core populations of Western Europe.

2. Sources and Targets of Church Power, where the key issue is whether the Western European tradition of monogamy predated Church influence.

3. How Widespread Was Compliance with the Church’s Rules on Incestuous Marriage? A basic claim of Shulz et al. is that the Church eradicated widespread cousin marriage. I present the case that cousin marriage and clan-type social organization were never characteristic of the West.

4. The Geography of Church Influence. I show that Western individualism does not at all map onto the research on Western family history which shows that some areas of Western Europe long under Church influence (e.g., southern France) retained collectivist family patterns, while some areas of Western Europe that were Christianized late are the most individualistic (Scandinavia).

Those who have read my book, The Sword of Christ, will be familiar with the spectacular collapse of that last bastion of Christian Biblical orthodoxy, the Southern Baptist Convention, into Satanic Jewish Leftism. The SBC’s Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, led by the snake Russell Moore, was the vehicle through which much of this subversion was made. Though Christian Zionists captured the Southern Baptists long ago, the Convention continued for decades to held the line on traditional social issues and, with only a few exceptions, refrained from demonizing its almost wholly White congregants.

That changed during the past decade, with a sharp acceleration after the Charlottesville Unite the Right rally. Russell Moore led the charge. The Southern Baptists are now in the process of renaming themselves the “Great Commission Baptists,” a decision that Convention President J.D. Greear declared is “essential” to supporting Black Lives Matter. Greear also took it upon himself to insist that “Our Lord Jesus was not a White Southerner but a brown-skinned Middle Eastern refugee.”

New documents reveal Moore and the rest of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, to be hired guns directed by the prominent international Jews George Soros and Paul Singer. It is thus unsurprising that the ERLC recently claimed that “there has been no evidence that voter fraud has been occurring,” and that “widespread election fraud is difficult, if not impossible, to pull off at the presidential level.” Russell Moore’s name also appeared in the Podesta emails released by WikiLeaks in 2016. These documents are not smoking guns, but they are highly suggestive, and provide rare physical evidence of the active Jewish subversion of American Christianity. White Christians must build our own Church, cleansed of the Jew—our Enemy from the start.