General

Joining the dots on Satanic subversion: A speculation

/7 Comments/in /by

What is the connection between occultist Aleister Crowley, the horror movie Rosemary’s Baby, and recent US president George W Bush? Fasten your seatbelts, for I will be taking you on a journey through time of exactly a hundred years, into the realm of dark magic fictionalised in The Devil Rides Out by Crowley’s acquaintance Dennis Wheatley.

This is admittedly speculative and would be labeled a “conspiracy theory,” but since the covid-19 debacle, a critical thinking movement has grown. There are doubts about almost any official narrative, and the movement rejects the presumed authority of ‘experts’. Prominent people and events in history are reconsidered and counter-narratives are formed. Among some far-fetched ideas there is many a reasoned conjecture, and sometimes perceived links between happenings seem too much for coincidence. Nonetheless, conspiracy theories remain speculative and readily dismissed by the establishment, partly because facts are hidden and mainstream media act as gatekeepers for the truth.

Take, for example, the Skull & Bones Club.  The existence of this sinister association is undeniable: its lodge is in the grounds of Yale University, and its membership includes numerous leading American figures, many of whom graduated at the law school. But newspapers and broadcasters and books for popular consumption omit mention of it, and consequently few citizens are aware that the institutions of society are led by men initiated to occult beliefs and practice.

Crowley’s influence on society cannot be overestimated. On amicable terms with Aldous Huxley and George Orwell, he would undoubtedly have given these authors material for their dystopian classics Brave New World and Nineteen Eighty-Four. A spy for British security services, Crowley had contacts at the highest level of the British state. He would have shared the vision of a technocratic regime, although his motive was not order and control, but a ‘beast system’ of sexual degeneracy.

Referring to himself as the embodiment of 666, Crowley was described as the wickedest man in the world. He was deeply immersed in Kabbalistic teachings and the idea of a higher realm of consciousness, creating a pseudo-religion of Thelema. He devised ritual practices that typically entailed sadomasochism and sexual depravity.  He inspired the Babalon Working rite, first performed in the Mojave Desert by L Ron Hubbard (founder of scientology) and rocket scientist Jack Parsons. The objective was to incarnate the Thelema goddess Babalon, also known as the Scarlet Woman.

The aforementioned Rosemary’s Baby dramatised such demonic pursuit. Roman Polanski’s film was based on the book by Ira Levin, who later wrote The Stepford Wives and The Boys from Brazil.  A child of Satan is born to an innocent woman who had the misfortune to live next door to Devil worshippers on the exclusive upper west side of Manhattan. Allegedly Levin was not merely an author, but a secret service propagandist. The forces of evil are revealed to use through fiction.

In 1925 a daughter was born to American socialite Pauline Pierce. Several months earlier, Pierce had participated in a sexual magic ritual similar to the Babalon Working, with Crowley and his novelist friend Frank Harris. She was Crowley’s mistress at the time, before returning to her husband and raising the child, who they named Barbara.

The girl went on to marry George Bush, who in 1976 was appointed as director of the CIA. Bush is suspected of organising the assassination of John F Kennedy in 1963.  After serving as Ronald Reagan’s vice-president in the 1980s, Bush was elected as 41st president. Barbara Bush would have known she was marrying into the dark side: Bush was a Skull & Bones man (indeed, this secret society is believed to be a recruiting ground for US intelligence).

The facial likeness of Barbara Bush and Crowley is remarkable; see here for a discussion. If we consider the possibility that the president’s wife was conceived by Satanic ritual, we could also wonder on the offspring of George and Barbara’s union. It was on the watch of George W Bush, 43rd president, when the 9/11 event shocked the world.

Critical thinkers deny the official story of the Twin Towers, believing that this was an inside job to justify a giant stride towards totalitarian security and surveillance. Bush Junior would have known in advance. Like all presidents he was an actor on stage, but was he something more than that?  Perhaps the destruction of the World Trade Center was a sacrificial offering to Satan. After all, the sitting president had the seed of Crowley – his grandfather.

USAID Destroyed: Trump and Musk’s Conservative Revolution Continues

/1 Comment/in /by

I know a lot of people who are sympathetic to White interests are very skeptical about Trump. I get it, but he is doing a lot of good things—the moves against DEI, transgenderism, deporting illegals, and the attempt to rein in federal employees by putting them on leave and firing them. And now getting rid of USAID and much of the funding for leftist NGOs, like the ones that are paid to process illegals. Could anyone expect more?

From Arktos.

The liquidation of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is an event whose significance can hardly be overstated. When the Soviet Union abolished the Comintern (Third International) and later the Cominform, structures that advocated the ideological interests of the USSR on a global scale, it marked the beginning of the end for the international Soviet system. Although the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (COMECON) and the Warsaw Pact Organization existed until 1991, their demise was essentially predetermined during Khrushchev’s time.

Something similar is happening today in America, as USAID was the main operational structure for the implementation of globalist projects. Essentially, it was the primary transmission belt for globalism as an ideology aimed at the worldwide imposition of liberal democracy, market economics, and human rights, while dismantling sovereign states and overthrowing regimes capable of resisting this on a global scale.

Through this agency, globalism was embedded in various countries. That is why USAID was financed with a substantial portion of the U.S. federal budget: about 1% — amounting to $50 billion annually. When you factor in subsidies from other globalist structures, this figure at least doubles. Thus, approximately 2% of the American treasury was spent on this agency each year. One can only imagine the material resources this organization possessed. Additionally, it was closely integrated with a certain segment of the Central Intelligence Agency (most USAID branches worldwide served as cover for CIA activities, into which globalist ideas were actively embedded).

After sweeping out the previous U.S. political leadership — super-globalists — Donald Trump began purging the CIA of representatives from this globalist structure. The banning of USAID is a critical, fundamental move, the importance of which, as I said, cannot be overstated. This is especially true because countries like Ukraine largely depend on this agency, receiving significant funding through it. All Ukrainian media, NGOs, and ideological structures were financed by USAID. The same applies to almost the entire liberal opposition in the post-Soviet space, as well as liberal regimes in various countries, including Maia Sandu’s Moldovan administration and many European political regimes, which were also on USAID’s payroll.

And suddenly, all of this collapses. Sure, some committed liberals will continue their activities out of ideological conviction, but they are a very small percentage. The vast majority of liberalism and global liberal networks operate on the principle of “money for loyalty.” But whose money funds this liberal “loyalty”? It is USAID’s money. Therefore, without USAID — and given that Elon Musk has called it a “criminal organization responsible for deaths” — this funding for subversive activities will cease. This, in turn, is a blow to the entire global liberal environment. Essentially, it is a missile strike on the headquarters of globalism. And Trump and Musk made it happen.

The consequences, in my view, will be profoundly felt in all countries. We will suddenly realize that this oppressive pressure on our Russian society is coming to an end. It is no secret that USAID helped draft Yeltsin’s Constitution in 1993, through which it controlled Russia. Before that, it played a role in the collapse of the Soviet Union, laying the foundation for the creation of the Russian Federation, which was initially intended to be part of the global world under the direct control of USAID and the globalist elites.

Vladimir Putin began resisting this external control as soon as he came to power in 2000, focusing on strengthening sovereignty. However, USAID operated in Russia until 2012. It was only when Putin assumed his third presidential term that USAID was officially banned from Russia. Indirectly, of course, it continued to exert influence, as much of the political opposition and many representatives of the so-called “sixth column” remained closely tied to it. Only now is this coming to an end.

I must admit, this news is so significant that it is hard to comprehend. Until recently, we believed that globalists were a permanent fixture, that USAID was an almost eternal structure, and that the U.S. would always be the vanguard of globalization. We thought nothing could be done, and no one could change this. But it turns out that it can be changed — and it already has been.

(Translated from the Russian)

David Lebryk and “Wally” Adeymano

/4 Comments/in /by

I have the feeling that DOGE is going to uncover huge corruption in Treasury payments. We all know the reputation of Nigerians for honesty and integrity.

Horus on his Substack: The problem with the invaders is they are different people

/1 Comment/in /by
(32) Home | Substack

Jewish immigrants like the Rothschilds bribed their way into Parliament and pressured politicians to supplant British foreign policy with Jewish foreign policy (e.g. supporting the Ottoman Empire). In the 1880s a massive wave of Jewish immigrants moved to Britain and the USA. The existing Jewish communities used the ‘pogroms’ narrative to justify treating the immigrants as ‘refugees’ and condone their takeover of the East End of London, parts of Manchester and Leeds and other areas, driving out and replacing British people.

The post-1880 Jewish immigrants included violent criminals, disturbing neighbours, rapacious landlords and businessmen, and socialist/communist/anarchist subversives (the essays I’m working on will cover this). They then brought Zionism too. British politicians began to be recruited to the Zionist cause, betraying their own nation.

The descendants of the 1880s generation include many of the most aggressive subversives in British history, including Anthony Lester, Richard Stone and Barbara Roche. They include the terrorists who assaulted British police at Cable Street, and those who formed the 43 Group and 62 Group. They set the pattern for the violent suppression of native resistance to immigration.

Several of the leading communist revolutionaries from the Russian Empire were free to live in Britain for several years before they overthrew the monarchy back home: Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, Litvinov and many others.

Some Maltese had moved to Britain by the 1910s and were largely involved in crime or illicit business. Romani gypsies had been allowed to move in over previous centuries and conducted themselves similarly, as did Irish travellers. Various Irish immigrants in Britain were supporters of anti-British militancy. Contingents of Somalis and other Africans were allowed to stay in Cardiff, Liverpool and other ports after the First World War, and their criminality quickly led to violence. Chinese workers were employed where possible to drive down wages and standards.

Throughout the interwar period, Marxists like CLR James and Kwame Nkrumah were free to use Britain as their base of operations, just as Lenin and co had done.

After the 1948 Nationalities Act, Afro-Caribbeans began to flood in, encouraged and facilitated by Jews of both pre- and post-1880 descent, and later Indians, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis. By 1988, Muslims were confident enough to demand the banning of books and threaten death to their enemies. Irish journalists in Britain like Sean O’Grady have since endorsed their demands.

What reason is there to think that these people were as loyal to the country as our parents and grandparents were? Were the Jamaicans who pimped out or raped white women loyal? All available evidence suggests that most immigrants simply see life in Britain as easier, more lucrative and, for many of them, wide open to predation. The Muslim rape gangs date to the 1970s at the very latest, but probably began as soon as the first Muslims moved in and got the measure of British tolerance combined with state-imposed ‘anti-racism’.

All immigration, i.e. state importation of strangers, has been forced on us against our interests. It did not become bad in the 1990s. And they were not “coming home”.

First, for Britain at least, the initial wave of immigration came from the Commonwealth and that generation was as loyal to their Queen as anyone born and bred in Bradford or Birmingham or London. They were coming home, only to very bad weather. The immigration we have seen in the last twenty to thirty years however was very different. It turns out that importing people from war torn countries, countries that have experienced brutal genocides, say such as Rwanda, was not such a good idea.
Laura Perrins

JTA: A South Carolina rabbi’s Holocaust memorial speech was pulled from public TV for being too ‘political’

/2 Comments/in /by

The Holocaust industry has always been about promoting immigration, diversity, etc. From the Preface to Culture of Critique:

The Holocaust framework allowed one to put aside as irrelevant any legitimate ground for criticizing Israel, to avoid even considering the possibility that the rights and wrongs were complex” (Novick 1999, 155). As the threat to Israel subsided, the Holocaust was promoted as the main source of Jewish identity and in the effort to combat assimilation and intermarriage among Jews. During this period, the Holocaust was also promoted among gentiles as an antidote to anti-Semitism. In recent years this has involved a large-scale educational effort (including mandated courses in the public schools of many U.S. states) spearheaded by Jewish organizations and staffed by thousands of Holocaust professionals aimed at conveying the lesson that “tolerance and diversity [are] good; hate [is] bad, the overall rubric [being] ‘man’s inhumanity to man’” (Ibid., 258–259). The Holocaust has thus become an instrument of Jewish ethnic interests, not only as a symbol intended to create moral revulsion at violence directed at minority ethnic groups—prototypically the Jews, but also as an instrument to silence opponents of multiethnic immigration into Western societies.

A South Carolina rabbi’s Holocaust memorial speech was pulled from public TV for being too ‘political’

… Following the prayer, Rose instructed the crowd to be seated and launched into his speech, during which he sought to tie the Holocaust to “the attacks on human rights and human lives which echo a dangerous refrain.”

“In our time we are witnessing a resurgence of hate, of antisemitism, of prejudice, of discrimination,” the rabbi said, in a video he later posted to YouTube himself. “Our country, which has served so often as a beacon of hope to those suffering around the world, is now, as of this week, refusing aid of any kind to refugees.”

He then implored attendees to visit the website of HIAS, the Jewish immigrant and refugee aid group, which has been open about its struggles to continue to fulfill its mission after Trump’s recent freezing of federal funds for refugee assistance.

“If the Holocaust happened and ended yesterday, would the same Jews who were let in this country be let in today?” Rose continued. He then moved onto LGBTQ issues, referencing Trump’s recent executive orders that recognize only two official sexes and bar transgender health care for minors: “My friends, my neighbors, my colleagues who are members of the LGBTQ+ community, are terrified right now.”

Rose then briefly pivoted to the issue of book bans, especially potent in South Carolina as one of the leading states for book challenges. “When we talk about education and the censoring of things where we need to learn about and legitimize the experience of suffering of other people, books are being taken out of libraries and our children are not being taught the full spectrum of experience in this country,” he said.

South Carolina in recent years has restricted classroom access to some books about the Holocaust and antisemitism. Districts in the state have briefly pulled the novel “The Fixer” from one district prior to a review and pulled a book about local Holocaust survivors from its middle-grade curriculum. The state is currently facing a civil rights lawsuit over a new law restricting the teaching of subjects including race and gender; the state superintendent, who was a featured speaker at the Auschwitz event, is a named party in the suit.

“I was so nervous giving the speech that I was trembling,” Rose recalled on Friday about his speech. “But I was immediately surrounded by people who wanted to give me hugs.”

Only one person told him they objected to the speech, he said, because “he didn’t believe that religion and, in particular, prayer was ever the platform to bring in politics. To which I responded, then you might as well get rid of the Hebrew Bible.”

The injection of modern-day politics into Holocaust commemoration events, which are often attended by political figureheads, has been a subject of controversy for years. Similar ceremonies this year have also been magnets for political grandstanding, as Jews were removed from one commemoration in Dublin for protesting the Irish president lamenting the death toll in Gaza during his remarks. No world leaders were invited to speak at an event this week at Auschwitz to mark the 80th anniversary of its liberation, a date that the United Nations designated as International Holocaust Remembrance Day 20 years ago.

The South Carolina speech wasn’t the only Holocaust memorial controversy to play out this week in the United States. This week a leaked memo from the Defense Intelligence Agency, a wing of the Pentagon, instructed staff to pause all activities related to the commemoration of Holocaust Day of Remembrance and other activities the agency deemed representative of diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, or DEI, now banned from the federal government via a Trump executive order.

Rose has harsh words for the South Carolina Council on the Holocaust, which the state created in 1989, because it exists in parallel with the state’s other education policies suppressing the teaching of racial history and the recognition of children’s gender identities.

“They believe that by talking about Holocaust education, it gives them license to ignore every other political issue of suffering in their educational processes,” he said.

This week the Trump-appointed chair of the Federal Communications Commission also announced a broad investigation into NPR and PBS that could lead to their funding being revoked, putting public broadcasters on edge.

Does America have a health care crisis?

/1 Comment/in /by

“My child is one of 30 children in her class and she’s the only Irish child.”

/21 Comments/in /by