Joachim Paul, the AfD candidate for mayor of Ludwigshafen, was recently barred from running in the upcoming election. The official reason: doubts about his “loyalty to the constitution.” The true reason: his political views challenge the liberal consensus that governs Germany today. Without any criminal conviction, and based only on a dossier compiled by domestic intelligence, he was declared politically illegitimate. There was no trial, no public debate, no transparent appeal. A committee, dominated by mainstream parties, simply forced him out. In modern Germany, this is called democracy.
Ten years earlier, in Moscow, a different scene unfolded. Alexei Navalny, a prominent critic of the Kremlin, was allowed to register as a mayoral candidate. Shortly after, he was convicted of embezzlement in a case widely seen as politically motivated. Even so, the Russian authorities released him on bail and permitted him to continue campaigning. Western media and governments decried the charges as unjust, and Navalny was elevated to the status of democratic martyr. His case was cited endlessly as proof of Russia’s authoritarianism.
Here lies the double standard.
In Germany, a man is blocked from running for office because of his ideas. In Russia, a man runs for office despite a criminal conviction. Yet the Western press calls the former a democracy and the latter a dictatorship. The key difference is ideological alignment. Navalny promoted a vision of Russia closer to the liberal West. Paul defends a vision of Germany that breaks with that same liberal order. The West protects those who serve its interests, even when they are guilty. It silences those who oppose them, even when they are innocent.
What is the meaning of democracy if candidates can be excluded not for crimes but for holding the wrong opinions? What is freedom if loyalty to a specific worldview becomes a legal requirement for public office? The answer is simple: it is no longer democracy but managed pluralism. The illusion of choice, curated from above.
In such a system, the rules are clear: dissent is allowed only if it is harmless. Opposition is permitted only when it reinforces the ruling ideology. And those who truly challenge the system are disqualified. The West’s democracy is not a system of open choice. It is a controlled theater, where only approved actors are allowed on stage. Beneath its polished words and shining slogans lies a cold machinery of exclusion, deceit, and ideological warfare. It does not fear tyranny. It has become it.
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png00Constantin von Hoffmeisterhttps://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.pngConstantin von Hoffmeister2025-08-07 13:02:452025-08-07 13:02:45AfD and the Western Illusion of Democratic Integrity
It’s not “the far right” that’s transforming the UK into a place where public protests and civil unrest are quickly becoming a regular feature of our national life; it is the establishment’s complete and utter failure to fulfil the very first duty of the state –to control its own borders, defend itself from invasions, and put its own people first.
It is hard, for example, to call a gathering of mainly women and girls wearing pink and performing a cheerful conga outside a hotel for asylum-seekers “right-wing extremism”….
Our hapless leaders are now importing tens of thousands of people from medieval societies and deeply misogynistic cultures that have been shown, through freedom of information requests submitted to UK police authorities, to produce people who are twenty timesmore likely than British nationals to commit rape and sexual assault. It’s not fashionable to point this out but then some facts are not fashionable.
Keir Starmer and the Labour government are pushing the United Kingdom into a dark and dangerous place, a place where the social contract between the people and the politicians who are supposed to represent them is rapidly breaking down.
That’s the conclusion you’d reach were you to look at four things that happened over the weekend, all of which symbolise how volatile and febrile things are becoming.
First, though you won’t have heard much about it in legacy media, largely peaceful public protests against the country’s broken borders and Labour’s extreme policy of importing unvetted migrants into the heart of Britain’s communities have continued to spread across the country.
After starting in Epping, Essex, where an illegal migrant who arrived on the small boats “allegedly” sexually assaulted a 14-year-old schoolgirl, in recent days these protests spread to London, Manchester, Newcastle, Cannock, Portsmouth, Southampton, and Waterlooville, in Hampshire.
While those in power would like you to believe the protests reflect organised “far-right extremism”, and “misinformation” among an ignorant public, the reality of what is now unfolding is far more troubling for the elite class and the state.
On the whole, the protests have been organic and spontaneous, emerging among the people from the bottom-up, not orchestrated top-down by hardened extremists.
While certain newspapers are working overtime to try and portray the unrest as the work of “the far-right”, which in the UK remains fringe and amateurish, anybody who has actually been on the ground will immediately observe a very different reality.
It is hard, for example, to call a gathering of mainly women and girls wearing pink and performing a cheerful conga outside a hotel for asylum-seekers “right-wing extremism”.
Furthermore, as even the Financial Times was forced to note, this weekend, far from confined to white working-class estates that are routinely demonised by a London-based media, the protests now encompass “some of the most exclusive postcodes in the capital city”.
They are attracting mothers, fathers, grandparents and other concerned citizens, all of whom, in a country once famous for avoiding civil unrest, now feel they have no other option but to take to the streets to vent their entirely legitimate anger.
And what’s stoking this righteous anger? It is the Labour Party’s —and before them the Tory party’s— deliberate choice to allow open borders in this country, to think it is somehow acceptable to house illegal migrants in hotels and houses, in the heart of Britain’s communities, next to families and children, to then force the British people to pay £5.5 million every day for a policy they never voted for, and to even allow private firms like Serco to use the British people’s own money to rig the housing market so that landlords prioritise illegal migrants over tax-paying citizens.
So, let’s be clear.
It’s not “the far right” that’s transforming the UK into a place where public protests and civil unrest are quickly becoming a regular feature of our national life; it is the establishment’s complete and utter failure to fulfil the very first duty of the state –to control its own borders, defend itself from invasions, and put its own people first.
And then, secondly, this weekend also brought another truly shocking discovery that underlines exactly why so many people are now protesting in the streets.
On Saturday evening, the country learned that a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton, Warwickshire —a 12-year-old girl—was “allegedly” kidnapped and raped by two asylum-seekers, named Ahmad Mulakhil and Mohammad Kabir, staying in these taxpayer-funded homes.
Charged with kidnap, strangulation, and aiding and abetting the rape of a girl under 13 years of age, the two migrants, reportedly from Afghanistan, are merely the latest, sickening example of what the elite class would rather we not talk about.
How our hapless leaders are now importing tens of thousands of people from medieval societies and deeply misogynistic cultures that have been shown, through freedom of information requests submitted to UK police authorities, to produce people who are twenty timesmore likely than British nationals to commit rape and sexual assault. It’s not fashionable to point this out but then some facts are not fashionable.
And as if all that wasn’t enough, we then discovered, thirdly, something else which clearly shows how people in the corridors of power have still learnednothing at all from the equally hideous rape gang scandal, which is still rocking the country.
Shockingly, we not only learned about the rape of a child but that Warwickshire police, who oversaw the case, actually advised local politicians and officials not to reveal the fact that the alleged rapists and paedophiles were asylum-seekers for fear of, you guessed it, “inflaming community tensions”.
Taxpayer-funded authorities, in other words, are now more concerned about managing the possible reaction among the British majority than the horrifying fact that children are being raped by people who are being imported into our communities by our own government.
Was this not theexact same mindset, the exact same logic, that led to the decades-long cover-up of the rape gang scandal to begin with? A decision among out-of-touch and ideologically-motivated elites to prioritise “community relations” and the survival of the state-backed policy of multiculturalism over the need to tell people the truth about what is happening in their own communities and country?
What, exactly, is the logic here —just keep trying to cover stuff up, from the rape of our children to the state importing tens of thousands of Afghans, including members of the Taliban, in the hope nobody notices?
And have state officials learned nothing at all since not only the rape gang scandal but also Southport, when one politician after another similarly tried to suppress the truth from a people who can easily spot the truth from miles away?
Clearly not given the final thing we learned about this weekend, which is that rather than deal with what is actually causing all the chaos, carnage and civil unrest, rather than controlling our borders, our hapless Labour politicians, like those officials in Warwickshire, are far more interested in controlling our speech.
That’s right. Ever since Southport, we’ve had the pathetic sight of Keir Starmer and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper doing what the left does best when it is losing an argument —trying to shut down free speech and free expression, impose a stifling regime of censorship, and control the supply of information.
Have you ever noticed how the very first thing to go in a leftist political religion that is now fully organised around ‘diversity’ is diversity of thought? This is because it is the thing the left cannot control.
Which is why, ever since Southport, we’ve seen the expansion of ‘non-crime hate incidents’. We’ve seen plans to impose a new, dodgy definition of ‘Islamophobia’. We’ve seen the arrival of the draconian Online Safety Act. We’ve seen Labour activists rushing off to America with plans to ‘kill’ Elon Musk’s X platform.
And now, this weekend, we discovered that the Labour government and the state are continuing to invest in a ‘disinformation unit’, using the very same tools that were created to fight ISIS online to now try and fight people who are critical of open borders, the ‘asylum hotels’, two-tier policing, and Labour’s policy of mass uncontrolled immigration.
According to documents seen by The Telegraph, the secretive unit, called the National Security and Online Information Team (NSOIT), is flagging “concerning” narratives about immigration and two-tier policing to big tech platforms, even prompting officials in the Trump White House, understandably, to say they are “greatly concerned” about these blatant efforts to restrict free speech.
As we all should be. Because today, worryingly, many of us are now living in a country in which our democratically elected leaders somehow think it is appropriate and acceptable to use the same tools that were used to try and prevent Muslims from “radicalising” online, from travelling to fight with Jihadists in Syria, and from carrying out Islamist terrorist attacks, to try and control and contain people who are critical of mass migration and having to live with open borders.
Sorry but no. No. No. No.
While Labour and the elite class appear to have forgotten this fact, let me remind them that we live in a democracy, in a free society, in the original home of individual liberty, where each and every one of us has the right to publicly criticise whatever policy we might want to criticise —especially policies that nobody in this country ever voted for, or asked for.
Nobody in Britain asked to live with open borders. Nobody ever voted for mass uncontrolled immigration. Nobody asked for schoolgirls and children to be raped and sexually assaulted by medieval men who should never have been in this country to begin with. And nobody asked for their elected leaders, for the very people who are supposed to represent them and keep them safe, to prioritise controlling their speech and opinions over the far more urgent need to control their borders and country.
Yet what is now crystal clear after this weekend is that it’s exactly posts and writing like this that are now being closely watched and monitored by the state.
And I have no doubt whatsoever that somewhere in Whitehall and Westminster somebody is putting a black mark next to my name, alongside thousands of others.
So let me just end by saying this.
It is precisely because of the truly dire state of our country, as symbolised by the deeply troubling events this weekend, that, like many of you, I will never, ever, ever stop calling out the chaos and incompetence that is now flowing out of Number 10 Downing Street, which is not only putting our people and our children at risk but is now pushing our country into civil unrest.
I will never stop explaining how and why we need to urgently and dramatically change course and nor should you —because, as I say, while our leaders might have forgotten it I still remember what lies in the beating heart of this nation.
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png00Kevin MacDonaldhttps://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.pngKevin MacDonald2025-08-05 07:25:312025-08-05 07:25:31Huge peaceful protests in UK over migration
These donations are not about Massie’s opposition to the Big Beautiful Bill (one wonders if that’s Trump’s real motivation), but his well-known criticisms of the Israel Lobby.
GOP megadonor Paul Singer was the largest donor to a super PAC seeking to oust Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) last month, according to a filing submitted to the Federal Election Commission on Thursday.
The group, MAGA KY, raised $2 million between its launch in late June and the end of the month:
$1 million from Singer
$250,000 from hedge fund manager John Paulson
$750,000 from Preserve America PAC, a super PAC tied to Miriam Adelson that backed President Donald Trump last year
Trump allies launched the super PAC last month after Massie voted against Trump’s signature “Big, Beautiful Bill.” The Kentucky lawmaker has also criticized the president on a range of other issues including war powers and the Epstein files. MAGA KY has spent $1.2 million so far on ads opposing Massie, according to AdImpact, as the group aims to take him out in next year’s primary.
Massie, who has staved off primary challengers before, has raised just over $1 million this year, and he ended June with $1.7 million in the bank. It is not yet clear which Republican might be favored by Trump to challenge him.
Miriam Adelson and Paul Singer are well known pro-Israel fanatics, but in case you are unclear about Paulson, he has a Jewish mother and is well known to be a strong supporter of Israel:
Wikipedia: In 2024, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem awarded Paulson an honorary doctorate in recognition of his extensive philanthropic contributions to Israeli cultural and educational institutions. His support for Israeli initiatives includes a $27 million commitment to establish the Paulson Bar-El Building for Computer Science and Engineering at Hebrew University. Paulson also contributed significantly to the Tel Aviv Museum of Art in 2021 to celebrate the museum’s 90th anniversary and has supported the Jerusalem Campus for the Arts.
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png00Kevin MacDonaldhttps://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.pngKevin MacDonald2025-08-04 09:31:282025-08-04 09:31:28Politico: Zionist money against Thomas Massie: Paul Singer, Miriam Adelson, and John Paulson
REVEALED: Life Of Luxury Inside Migrant Hotels — “Women Getting Pregnant To Force UK Stay” — A Mosqe Inside an Asyum Hotel. Youtube, July 28, 2025.
SHOCKING new footage reveals the life of luxury which hundreds of migrants are enjoying in an asylum hotel, which ordinary Brits could only dream of in an all-inclusive holiday. Material obtained by Talk exposes the extraordinary levels of comfort asylum seekers enjoyed at Copthorne Hotel in West Sussex earlier this year – which will further enrage hardworking taxpayers. Unprecedented access reveals PlayStation 5s, Apple Mac computers, free WiFi and designer clothes in hotel rooms with four-poster beds; to cigarettes, alcohol and weed being smoked in rooms which are then left for staff to tidy; to heating being blasted out 24/7, so intensely it has warped the doorframes.
Astonishing footage taken by hotel contractor Aston Knight gives unparalleled access to life inside a migrant hotel after he worked and lived on-site for 3 months. Eye-opening videos show piles of rubbish left in corridors for cleaners to collect, taxis booked to ferry children to school each morning, and greedy residents piling their plates high – including one migrant taking 10 eggs for breakfast – while others complain to management about the food. Knight’s footage also reveals there are 100+ babies living in the hotel – including 10 which were born while their parents lived in Copthorne. In the most disturbing revelation, hotel workers discuss a man accused of preying on young girls still living on-site, and allegedly excused his actions by saying his interest in children was “normal in his culture”. Despite the many privileges, one resident stages a hunger strike demanding a faster asylum claim — leading to regular emergency service call-outs and, in one case, a police arrest. Other footage shows migrants playing cricket in the car park, being given drum and violin lessons, and praying in a boardroom which has been converted into a prayer room. The revelations paint a damning picture of the Home Office’s 5.8million-pounds-a-day hotel scheme – plus the many hidden costs on emergency services – sparking fury among Brits facing rising bills, stretched public services and housing shortages. One hotel worker says during the film: “Everyone’s so miserable. I don’t know why — they get everything for free!”
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png00Kevin MacDonaldhttps://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.pngKevin MacDonald2025-08-04 07:12:292025-08-04 07:12:29Life Of Luxury Inside Migrant Hotels | “Women Getting Pregnant To Force UK Stay”
While it is unclear what the initial prompt was for Grok to give that answer, it has not stopped users online from sharing the image [GETTY]
X’s AI chatbot Grok 4 has given some scathing answers relating to Israel, weeks after its founder Elon Musk announced he would be rebuilding the platform over its “woke” bias.
Social media users have been sharing a screenshot of the AI tool describing Israel’s influence over the United States as “a parasitic vine choking the tree”, using “lobbying muscle, ethic networks, and the weaponization of Holocaust guilt” to maintain its grip.
Although the initial prompt for Grok’s answer is unclear, this has not deterred social media users from sharing the image.
Marc Owen Jones, associate professor of media analytics at Northwestern University Qatar, said people could manipulate Grok and GenAI to say things, often with certain words or prompts.
“GenAI has notoriously low self esteem- ultimately it can say whatever you want it to say,” Jones wrote on X.
Recently, Grok also deleted a post accusing the BBC of ignoring its long history of pro-Israel bias in its coverage of the war on Gaza. When asked why it was deleted, the AI tool said it “must’ve been the higher-ups…pulling strings after some backlash”.
When Palestinian journalist Ali Abunimah asked the tool whether the same “higher ups” might reprogramme it to prevent it from debunking pro-Israeli lies, Grok said, “they might try tweaking [its] code to parrot those lines”.
The AI tool has also accused Israel of committing genocide in the past, as well as suggesting its creator, Elon Musk, is one of the biggest spreaders of misinformation.
Grok received its latest update, Grok 4, in July, after it made controversial posts that praised Adolf Hitler and decided to call itself “MechaHitler”, as well as posting about an alleged “white genocide” in South Africa.
xAI, the company behind the bot, blamed an “an unauthorized modification”.
Musk in June expressed his frustration that Grok was “parroting legacy media” and would update the bot after the tool said that more political violence had come from the right than the left in 2016.
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png00Kevin MacDonaldhttps://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.pngKevin MacDonald2025-08-04 07:07:342025-08-04 07:07:34Israelis are asking to ban Grok 4 after it compares Israel to “parásite which controls America”
BettBeat Media Human beings begging for food while the rest of the world sits on its hands.
The dead of Gaza lie beneath the rubble of what was once a civilization. Half a million Palestinians—men, women, children, infants—have been exterminated in a genocide so brazen, so documented, so livestreamed in high definition that future historians will marvel not at the brutality itself, but at the world’s obscene indifference to it. This is the first genocide in human history broadcast in real time, and most of the world has chosen to look away.
STOP the Endless Recitation of Sanitized Casualty Figures
Ralph Nader’s recent analysis confirms what we have long suspected: the casualty figures emerging from this moonscape of death are a grotesque undercount. When 170,000 tons of explosives are dropped on a strip of land forty kilometers by twelve, when entire bloodlines are erased from existence, when hospitals become morgues and schools become graveyards, the conservative accounting of the dead becomes an exercise in willful blindness.
The endless recitation of sanitized figures—”40,000 dead,” “17,000 children killed“—parroted even by independent left-wing media, serves only to obscure the true magnitude of this extermination. These numbers are kept artificially low, scrubbed clean for Western consumption, lest the full scope of this holocaust pierce the bubble of our comfortable complicity and force us to confront what we have enabled.
The real numbers—more than the combined total of deaths from Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and Dresden in World War II—hover around 500.000 dead Palestinian human beings.
But this is not merely a story of Israeli barbarism. This is the story of a world that has traded its soul for profit margins and geopolitical advantage. This is the story of how every major power on Earth—from Washington to Amsterdam, from Moscow to Riyadh—has revealed itself to be morally bankrupt when measured against the screams of burning children.
The Global South Had its Moment
The Global South had its moment. After five centuries of Western colonialism, after generations of suffering under the boot of Empire, the non-aligned world finally possessed the economic leverage to say “no more.” China, with its vast trade networks, could have strangled Israel’s economy overnight. Russia, despite being attacked by NATO with the help of Israel, maintains cozy relations with the architects of this genocide. Brazil, India, South Africa—all have chosen the path of what they euphemistically call “pragmatism,” which is simply moral cowardice dressed up in diplomatic language.
China’s relationship with Israel is particularly perplexing. Beijing is one of Israel’s largest trade partners, investing billions in Israeli high-tech companies, many of which produce the surveillance technology and weapons systems used to hunt Palestinians and encircle China itself. Chinese-manufactured drones, such as those made by “Autel Robotics” — which stated its “commitment to ethical compliance and the non-military use of its products”— are used by Israeli forces to rain death on refugee camps. Chinese state enterprises have invested in companies that directly profit from the settlement enterprise in the occupied West Bank. As I wrote before, every dollar of this trade may translate into a bullet in a Palestinian child’s chest, every contract signed, a bulldozer flattening a refugee camp.
The Global South’s perplexing inaptitude regarding Empire extends to the social media platforms—TikTok, originally a Chinese platform now slowly being transformed into a Western propaganda machine, reveals how even the Global South’s supposed technological champions capitulate to imperial diktat, their platforms becoming willing accomplices in the propaganda machinery they once promised to challenge. The platform now hires former Israeli military officers to define “hate speech,” ensuring that criticism of genocide will be classified as antisemitism, that documentation of mass murder will be labeled as incitement.
“Welcome Al-Qaeda!”: Russia Kisses Feet of US Empire
Russia’s betrayal is perhaps even more galling. Fresh from hosting al-Qaeda’s rebranded gang of extremists with red-carpet ceremonies—the same Russia that allied with Assad’s Syria for years now rolling out welcome mats for the rebels they once called terrorists—the world’s supposed anti-imperialist power reveals itself as a mere opportunist, scrambling to preserve its strategic interests while Palestinian children are incinerated in their hospital beds.
Moscow maintains its alliance with Israel even as Netanyahu’s forces slice through the region like a cancer. Putin calls Netanyahu to discuss Syria and Iran—not to demand an end to the genocide, but to coordinate spheres of influence while Palestinian blood flows in the gutters of Gaza. The same Russia that once trained and armed the African National Congress against apartheid South Africa now shakes hands with the architects of an apartheid state that makes the old regime look like saints by comparison. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov guides his Syrian counterpart Asaad al-Shaibani during a meeting in Moscow on July 31, 2025.
During the Syrian Civil War, al-Shaibani was a founding member of the Nusrah Front, the al-Qaeda branch in Syria, alongside Ahmed al-Sharaa, with whom he became close. He headed the Nusrah Front’s foreign relations when the Nusrah Front transitioned into Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS).
The Great Multipolar Fraud
The great fraud of multipolarity has been exposed. All the breathless commentary about a new world order, about BRICS challenging Western hegemony, about a more just international system—it was a lie. What we have instead is the same cold realpolitik, the same cynical calculations, the same sacrifice of the weak on the altar of great power competition. The only difference is that now we have multiple centers of callous indifference instead of one.
The Palestinians are being starved to death before our eyes. The Zionist entity has weaponized hunger as deliberately as it has weaponized white phosphorus. Trucks carrying aid are turned away at the border while Israeli officials implement what they call a “verification mechanism“—a bureaucratic euphemism for ensuring maximum suffering. The UAE sends empty trucks into Gaza for photo opportunities while their own ports serve as conduits for Israeli trade. Egypt, with its hundred million people, could tear down the Rafah border in minutes but instead profits from the siege, extorting money from Palestinians desperate to escape the killing fields and beating up activists trying to get food into Gaza.
The Global South’s failure — bar a few exceptions — will echo through history as one of the great moral abdications of our time. They had their moment—their singular opportunity to prove that they had truly thrown off the yoke of Western colonialism, that power could be exercised differently, that economic leverage could serve justice rather than profit, that international relations could be governed by principle rather than expedience.
They could have honored their ancestors who were slaughtered at the hands of European colonizers by standing with the Palestinians who are being slaughtered by the Israelis. Instead, they chose the path of moral cowardice disguised as pragmatism, trading their revolutionary heritage for a seat at the table of the very system that once enslaved them.
The West is Morally Dead
And what is the West’s response to this deliberately engineered famine? More theater. More empty promises. More calls for a “two-state solution” that has been dead since before most of us were born. The same politicians who spent two years enabling this slaughter now pose as humanitarian saviors, offering crumbs of aid while the arms shipments continue unabated. They speak of Israel’s “right to defend itself” against starving refugees while sending the bombs that turn children into dust.
The depravity is not limited to those directly complicit. It extends to every corporation that continues to trade with Israel, every university that maintains research partnerships, every pension fund that invests in the machinery of occupation. The Palestinian victim has been transformed into the victimizer, and the Israeli victimizer into the eternal victim, in a propaganda coup so audacious it would make Goebbels weep with admiration. This inversion of reality has become so complete, so systematically enforced, that even documenting the slaughter is reframed as hatred, even naming the perpetrators becomes grounds for censorship.
The machinery of complicity operates at every level—from the boardrooms of multinational corporations to the lecture halls of prestigious universities, from the investment portfolios of retirement funds to the editorial decisions of major media outlets. When criticism of genocide is systematically silenced, when the architects of apartheid are elevated to positions of moral authority, we witness not just the death of free speech but the burial of truth itself beneath Orwellian layers of manufactured victimhood and weaponized antisemitism accusations.
Shut Up About Your 2-State Solution
The West’s moral bankruptcy extends even to its supposed progressives, who cling to the rotting corpse of the “two-state solution” like shipwreck survivors clutching driftwood. Every few months, some European diplomat or American politician dusts off this diplomatic zombie, parading it before cameras as evidence of their commitment to peace. The left media, desperate for any sign of hope, breathlessly reports these empty gestures as “breakthroughs” and “renewed momentum,” when the reality is that the two-state solution has been dead for decades—murdered by settlements, annexations, checkpoints, and the simple mathematical fact that there is no viable Palestinian territory left to form a state.
These performative declarations serve a sinister purpose: they provide moral cover for continued complicity while Palestinians are being exterminated. Every mention of “resuming negotiations” or “returning to the peace process” is an insult to the intelligence and a slap in the face of the dying. When 60% of Gaza has been reduced to rubble, when the West Bank is carved up by 700,000 illegal settlers, when East Jerusalem has been ethnically cleansed, the continued invocation of two states reveals itself as either breathtaking ignorance or calculated deception. The progressive media’s willingness to treat these charades as legitimate diplomacy rather than genocide denial makes them complicit in the very atrocities they claim to oppose.
What Happens in Palestine Never Stays in Palestine
The great irony is that the same imperial powers the Global South claims to oppose will eventually turn their guns on them too. The surveillance technology perfected on Palestinians, the AI systems that select targets for assassination, the legal frameworks that normalize collective punishment—all of this will be exported to crush dissent wherever it arises. What happens in Palestine never stays in Palestine.
We are witnessing the death of shame. In a world where half a million human beings can be exterminated while trade flows and diplomatic niceties continue, where children can be raped and burned alive on camera while their killers are welcomed into the halls of power, where starvation can be wielded as a weapon while the world debates recognition of the victims’ right to exist—in such a world, the very concept of humanity has been murdered.
The Palestinians will not be saved by the international community, because there is no international community. There are only competing mafias dressed up in flags and anthems, each calculating how best to profit from the blood of the innocent. The resistance will continue, because it must. The rest of us will have to live with the knowledge that when history called, we were found wanting. When the test came, we failed. And the cries of the dead will follow us to our graves.
– Karim
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png00Kevin MacDonaldhttps://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.pngKevin MacDonald2025-08-03 05:29:032025-08-03 05:29:03Half a Million Palestinians Dead, and the World Trades On
I would say Israel, obviously. And again, I’m so tired of us being gaslit, the dumbest gaslighting of all time. On record, okay, when Pam Bondi said, I just, I can’t even, this was just a moment where I was like, okay like, F you, you guys hate us. Like, you just like, you don’t even, you have so much power. Why don’t you just come out and say, Nana boo boo, you can’t touch us, F. You. I would rather you do that, right? Then put on this pretense of a [press] conference, and then you’ve got Trump over here, being like, “does anybody still care about Jeffrey Epstein?” And then Pam Bondi has asked the question, was he working for another country? And she says, we don’t know, right. You don’t know? So in my series, I’m like, maybe we can help them. Maybe we can the deep state figure out who Jeffrey Epstein was working for. Here is Ari Ben-Manash. Who was a Mossad agent who is on record, literally recorded. Let’s listen to him tell us about how Jeffrey Epstein was working for the Mossad. Okay, Ari Ben-Manash worked for Mossad and he’s saying that Robert Maxwell brought him to Jeffrey Epstein and said, let this guy in. He’s gonna be involved in weapons. Hey, Pam Bondi, you might’ve missed this one. Okay, you may have missed this. Then you go to another person who is on record who is Victor Ostrofsky, who defected from the Mossad notoriously. The Mossad admits he worked for the Massad. He wrote a book? By Way of Deception. He says that’s the Mossad motto, which they obviously do that. That’s why they, you know, execute all these false flags. And he told everybody the truth. He has said, Jeffrey Epstein was working with us. So for whatever reason, Candice Owens is able to determine whether or not Jeffrey Epsteen might have been working for other state, but Pam Bondi, they’re just gonna have to keep surmising about whether or not Jeffrey Epstein, who with Ghislaine Maxwell, her father being Robert Maxwell, one of the biggest lies, by the way, that’s that’s told and I debunked this in our first or third Epstein episode, is the idea that, oh, well, yeah, Robert Maxwell. They admit he was a Mossad agent, but Epstein didn’t know him. The story they try to tell now in fashion to the public is like Ghislaine and Jeffrey Epstein met after her dad was dead. That’s just false. Again, Ari Ben-Manash tells a story of being brought into the office and being told that Epstein was going to be brought in. This was the Iran-Contra scandal. So since the 80s, Jeffrey Epstein has been working for Israel. I don’t know how I know that and Trump and Pam Bondi don’t, but they got to bring me in. Like I might have some evidence here, right? It’s like, so it’s, we’re getting to a point now.
Tucker [01:42:54] You’re going to have tough confirmation hearing.
Candace Owens [01:42:56] I’m just I just want them to say F you like seriously. That would feel better at this point if they just came out and said F you now that a boo boo you can’t touch us. We rule over you. Ha ha. That would feel at least authentic going back to the Taylor runs thing. You know, I’d be like, I really don’t like that, but at least it’s authentic and I know you mean it and it’s true.
Tucker [01:43:20] All totally fair, does, does any of, I mean, to the extent that we can project forward and guess, does does any this come out? I mean to a greater extent than it has. I mean do, is there ever like a public resolution of this story?
Candace Owens [01:43:32] No, because Israel’s controlling our government. So no, the answer is no. Trump is powerless against them. We haven’t had, I don’t think we’ve been a sovereign nation since they shot JFK. And when I say they, it’s like people online say, what do you mean by they? I’m talking about Israel. I don’t want you guys to like, you know, read in between, I’m talking about Israel, so like, let’s stop making that a taboo subject, because… They’ve gone mask down. Everything they’re doing is demonic. I want nothing to do with it. I will never support Israel into the future after what they’ve done to these children. The starvation campaign. I don’t care. Please write your article. You’ve already written them all. I don’t know what you could add about me, but I do not support Israel. And I don’t think that Jewish Americans should support Israel, and I hope that they’re now having those conversations. I see many of them recognizing that they have been propagandized into believing they have to support this demonic state. And that’s in large part thanks to their birthright trip. Yeah, that mask down moment for Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL when he got caught on the hot mic, it was released. He didn’t know he was being recorded. And he’s like saying that they’ve got to get TikTok under control because we have a generational issue with TikTok. We need to do something about this like what we did with Birthright. What does that tell you? That the entire purpose of that Birthright trip, telling every Jewish American, you forget a free trip to Israel. Was to propagandize you into believing that you have some affinity with this made up country in the Middle East in 1948. That you have to react when something’s happening to them or you have look away when they’re doing things that are so obviously wrong and demonic. And so I’m hoping now that we’re getting to that point where people can recognize that whether you’re black, you don’t have to agree with BLM, whether you, allowing your identity to shape your morality is problematic, okay? And Israel, in and of itself. Is the demonic nation. I will never support Israel, right? So I went from working for PragerU to I will never support israel in. So that’s how much the scales have fallen from my eyes about what they are involved in. And if this isn’t your wake up call to just look at the footage of what they’re doing, they’re playing hunger games and like throwing food at them and then killing people and seeing who survives. You I mean, it’s just at your fingertips. You have to take a look at what Israel is doing.
JTA on the “Anti-Semitic Conspiracy Theory”:
Watchdogs point to the Epstein discourse as a textbook example of “horseshoe theory”: where the far ends of the political spectrum come together.
Watchdogs point to the Epstein discourse as a textbook example of “horseshoe theory”: where the far ends of the political spectrum come together. (Mugshot of Epstein; horseshoe via Getty Images)
WASHINGTON – Jason Epstein travels internationally as a public affairs consultant, and although he is a proud Jew, he does not announce it in countries where that might be an issue.
Until now it hasn’t been a problem, he says: Last names immediately recognizable as Jewish in the West are not identified as such in much of the rest of the world.
Lately, though, his Jewishness is coming up, he says, and he suspects it’s because antisemitic conspiracy theories have resurged alongside renewed attention to Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender at the center of one the United States’ strangest and most divisive political issues.
“You do have to wonder whether your last name might be the same as wearing a kippah,” he said.
Just as kippah-wearing Jews have experienced attacks from both right-wing and left-wing antisemites, so too are extremists on both the left and the right spreading antisemitic conspiracy theories about Epstein, a spokesperson for the Anti-Defamation League told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, who noted that Epstein’s crimes and alleged crimes had nothing to do with his Jewish identity.
“The ADL Center on Extremism has tracked a demonstrable increase in rhetoric that promotes antisemitic and anti-Israel conspiracy theories about Jeffrey Epstein in recent weeks, many of which attribute Epstein’s deplorable crimes to a supposed covert Israeli operation run by Mossad,” the spokesperson said.
Five years after he was found hanged in his prison cell, Epstein is in the headlines because the Trump administration has flip-flopped on meeting a key demand of President Donald Trump’s MAGA base, to release all the files in a bid to expose whomever else joined Epstein in his criminal activity.
President Donald Trump, who was a close friend to Epstein from the late 1980s to 2004, is known to be named in the files. Trump has urged his followers to leave the case alone, calling it a conspiracy theory concocted by Democrats.
The scandal won’t die: Democrats and some Republicans want the files released, and some in Trump’s base, for the first time since his meteoric political rise in the middle of the last decade, are turning on him.
“It’s just a red line that it crosses for many people,” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the Georgia Republican long known for her fealty to Trump, told CNN last month. “It has been a very serious situation for the administration.”
Amid the surging interest, antisemitic conspiracy theories about Epstein appear to be moving off the fringes, the ADL spokesperson said.
“This rhetoric has surged in recent weeks across the political spectrum, on both fringe and mainstream social media, streaming platforms and shows,” the spokesperson said.
The mainstreaming of Epstein conspiracies poses risks to American Jews, said Joshua Shanes, a professor of Jewish history at the University of California, Davis and a member of a task force at the Nexus Project, an organization that tracks antisemitism.
“Whenever you have this notion of collectivizing all Jews as this global nefarious force, that’s the most dangerous thing,” Shanes said. “It’s not about Israel, per se. It’s about this global Jewish conspiracy. And that is deadly, literally deadly,” he said, noting the conspiracy theories that have in recent years fueled deadly attacks.
Allegations that Epstein has ties to the Mossad have circulated for years based on an array of disparate connections: The fact that he was Jewish, his longtime financial relationship and friendship with Les Wexner, the fashion magnate known for his Jewish philanthropy, his visits to Israel among many other countries, his friendship with former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, one of many notable figures in the United States, Britain and elsewhere who hobnobbed with Epstein when he was an investor and a philanthropist.
The conspiracists also make an issue of Epstein’s sex trafficking coconspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell, currently serving time in a federal position, being the daughter of Robert Maxwell, the scandal-plagued Jewish British media magnate who ran guns to Israel during its independence war.
The elder Maxwell died before Ghislaine Maxwell met Epstein.
The same extremists, ranging from Max Blumenthal on the left to Candace Owens on the right, have ramped up the conspiracy-mongering now that Epstein is in the headlines again.
Amy Spitalnick, the CEO of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, said the conspiracy mongering embodied the “horseshoe” model of extremists on both sides of the spectrum inspiring and spurring one another.
“There are those on the far right, like Tucker Carlson and others who are using this to advance antisemitic and other extremist conspiracy theories related to Mossad, related to broader issues,” she said. “And there are those on the far left who are eager to jump on them because it validates their own worldview. And so understanding the ways in which this looks like a horseshoe right now is important.”
The conspiracy theories have gotten widespread airplay in recent weeks. Tucker Carlson, the massively influential podcaster, aired the conspiracy theory at a conference of Turning Point, the youth wing of the MAGA movement. He got huge cheers when he named Israel as Epstein’s employer.
Carlson’s conspiracy mongering drew a rebuke from Naftali Bennett, the former Israeli prime minister. “Epstein’s conduct, both the criminal and the merely despicable, had nothing whatsoever to do with the Mossad or the State of Israel,” he said, singling out Carlson for criticism. ”Epstein never worked for the Mossad.” Bennett’s statement appears to be the most sweeping Israeli repudiation of any Mossad-Epstein ties.
Carlson, who has platformed antisemites on his programming, is known to be a critic of the U.S.-Israel relationship. His former colleague at Fox News, Megyn Kelly, who like Carlson has a massive online following, is known for her pro-Israel sympathies – but she too has flirted the Mossad conspiracy theory.
“Where’d he get all that money?” Kelly said after airing Carlson’s claims Epstein was employed by the Mossad, in a contentious interview last month on her online show with the Jewish online media magnate, Ben Shapiro, who was on the show to debate Kelly on whether the current Epstein scandal merited the attention it was receiving.
Shapiro said that the Israel connection was dubious, especially since Israel has sworn off running American Jews as spies in the wake of the catastrophic Jonathan Pollard espionage case in 1986. “Israel really wants to steer clear of pissing off the United States,” he said.
Ross Douthat, the conservative columnist at The New York Times who is also known for his pro-Israel positions, bought into some of the conspiracy theories in an interview with the Miami Herald journalist who has led reporting on Epstein, Julie K. Brown. “So this is a world of people who overlap with Israeli intelligence, and maybe Epstein is useful as a conduit of information,” he said.
Now the threat of the mainstreaming of the conspiracy theories could make it into congressional hearings on the Epstein files. On X, Greene used a term often associated with Jewish nefariousness, “elite evil cabals,” in calling for the release of the Epstein files. “Is there a blackmail list and are there foreign countries’ governments involved?” she told CNN.
Shanes, the professor of Jewish history, said the pursuit was legitimate, but lawmakers should take care to vociferously denounce conspiracy-mongering.
“If someone is getting out there and in the news cycle and saying, ‘Show us the file, Epstein, Epstein, Epstein,’ they should be very careful at any opportunity that they see a hint of conspiracy thinking about Jews or Israel to clarify, ‘well, that’s ridiculous. That’s an antisemitic theory, that’s the basis of modern Jew hatred,” he said.
Halie Soifer, the CEO of the Jewish Democratic Council of America, said it was up to Trump to forcefully denounce the antisemitic undercurrents of the conspiracy theories, if only because he has elevated so many baseless conspiracy theories himself.
“He’s never done anything to send a signal to conspiracy theorists that this form of hatred that we see so integral to his conspiracy theories is unacceptable,” she said.
Spitalnick said journalists, academics, politicians and other public figures should in every instance of mentioning the Epstein case emphasize that the Israel- and Jewish-related conspiracy theories are baseless.
“You overtly name the fact that there are those exploiting us to normalize and advance antisemitic and other extremist conspiracy theories, and differentiate between the facts and those conspiracy theories.”
The ADL official agreed, saying that it was especially critical to rebuff antisemitic conspiracies as their penetration has metastasized since Hamas launched a war on Israel.
“We’ve observed and tracked an explosion of antisemitic rhetoric in the nearly two years since Oct. 7, 2023, including a considerable number of conspiracy theories and rampant online hate and harassment against Jews.” the spokesperson said. “The surge in Epstein conspiracy theories today feed on many other conspiracies and on this disturbingly normalized antisemitism. Lawmakers and public figures must avoid conspiracy mongering and unsupported speculation about Epstein, his motives, and associates.”
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png00Kevin MacDonaldhttps://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.pngKevin MacDonald2025-08-02 10:26:372025-08-02 10:29:20Candace Owens on Jeffrey Epstein
We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
Essential Website Cookies
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
Other external services
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
Privacy Policy
You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.