The Labour Party War Against White Britain

Paul Weston’s article “Why is this not treason?” will make your blood boil. It describes the Labour Party’s war against White Britain. (The article links to another article, “Ethnically cleansing the English” that is also well worth reading.) Key quotes:

Despite the obvious violence that emanates from massed Muslims wherever they are in the world, the Labour government went to great lengths to portray Islam as The Religion of Peace, even as Christianity was mocked and defiled, and decent, moral and patriotic Britons were re-cast and criminalised as Islamophobic, race-hating Nazis….

There were two main reasons for such treachery. The first was held by Labour’s minority hard-left who wanted to destroy utterly the hated traditional establishment, and in this respect they had no choice but to declare war on their own people. To the hard-left, the enemy was the conservative, Christian, capitalist West of liberal-democracy Western civilisation — or, in other words, the majority of the English.

The second reason, held perhaps by the majority of Labour apparatchiks, was to ensure a socialist government in perpetuity via the imported foreign vote. Research into voting patterns conducted for The Electoral Commission in May 2005 showed that Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshis voted 56%, 50% and 41% for Labour. The equivalent figures for the Conservatives were 11%, 11% and 9%. …

It is a minority-controlled murderous genocide. Let me be very clear about this: Tony Blair and the Labour Party declared war on their own people, and there is (as yet) no substantive reason to believe we can survive this century, let alone the long term.

The point of war is not about fighting and shooting and storming and gung-hoing; it is about gaining physical territory and taking political control of the defeated territory and its people. This is exactly what is slowly but surely happening to the English….

Tony Blair injected Britain with a lethal cocktail of fast-breeding inassimilable aliens in the full and calculated knowledge that the country and its indigenous people would be incrementally destroyed as a result….

And when finally we become too defeated even to breed whilst we pay the aggressor to demographically swamp us [including welfare-facilitated polygyny], then we have not just lost a battle, we are in the midst of losing a war, our homeland, and our civilisation. We are rapidly on our way to extinction.

We have been betrayed. Tony Blair and the Labour Party have committed treason. The British people were never asked if they wished Muslim immigrants to colonise Britain in such large numbers that it constituted invasion. Had they been asked they would have replied with a resounding No!…

It does not really matter whether the third world was imported for revolutionary or electoral gain. All that matters is that Tony Blair’s Labour Party systematically allied itself with the massed imported ideologues of the Western world’s most persistent historical aggressor, and actively sided against Britain and the British people.

At TOO we deal forthrightly with Jewish involvement in mass non-White immigration and promotion of multiculturalism. It would be incorrect to overemphasize Jewish involvement in the war against White Britain. I have no doubt that Tony Blair richly deserves being brought up on treason charges. Nevertheless, there is no question that the organized Jewish community and individual Jews have been deeply involved in this war.  For them it was not at all a war against their  own people. The attempt to “destroy utterly the hated traditional establishment” fits well with Jewish attitudes and behavior discussed in The Culture of Critique. Indeed, Chapter 7, on Jewish involvement in immigration policy, includes a section on Britain (see here, p. 293ff). For example: ” The Board of Deputies [refused to support immigration restriction in the 1970s] on the basis that ‘Since all British Jews are, or are descended from, immigrants, it was unethical—even immoral, for a Jew to support immigration control, or at least tighter immigration control.’”

The only Jew Weston mentions  is “Ex-Communist” Peter Mandelson, a Labour Party politician described by Wikipedia as a “key architect” of New Labour. Peter Hitchens describes him as “a major politician who is largely personally responsible for taking this country much further down the road of left-wing radicalism than most people would have believed possible 20 years ago” (“The genius of Peter Mandelson“).

There is a website  (“Jewish involvment in the promotion of ‘hate speech’ laws, multiculturalism, mass immigration, denationalization, subversion of traditional values, and related items devoted to documenting Jewish involvement in the war on White Britain. I have not verified all the information and links available there, but it is an impressive array of material. For example:

Heading the concerted attack on our freedom [via imposition of “hate crime” laws]  is Eldred Tabachnik, president of the Jewish Board of Deputies, who is a close friend of Tony Blair, leader of the Labour Party. Apart from other measures expected to follow the Labour victory in the General Election, whereby Jack Straw of Jewish ancestry succeeded Tory Home Secretary, Michael Howard (identified by the Independent on Sunday, 14 April, 1996, as born Michael Hecht, son of a Jewish refugee from Romania). …

More … British Jews: Lord Lester of Herne Hill & Jim Rose, founded the The Runnymede Trust in 1968, just a few weeks after Enoch Powell‘s ‘rivers of blood’ speech in Birmingham. [The Runnymede Trust describes itself as “the UK’s leading independent race equality think tank. We generate intelligence for a multi-ethnic Britain through research, network building, leading debate, and policy engagement. Runnymede is working to build a Britain in which all citizens and communities feel valued, enjoy equal opportunities, lead fulfilling lives, and share a common sense of belonging.”] …

Jewish organizations are among the strongest opponents of the anti- immigration British National Party (BNP) in Britain. The Jewish leader Lord Greville Janner and his Board of Deputees of British Jews protested David Irvings early release after ‘only’ serving one year of his 3 years thought crime sentence….

Britain’s Jewish Foreign Secretary David Miliband, who replaced the former Jewish foreign Secretary (converted to Catholicism) Jack Straw, Eurocrat and globalist became known for his proposal to merge Europe with the Mideast. He also loudly advocated the refusal to admit Duch politician Geert Wilders to Britain. Miliband justifies communist terrorism against whitesDansk

After the scandal involving Labour speech writer Andrew Neather (of so far unconfirmed ethnicity) who admitted that Britain’s Labour Party purposely opened Britain’s borders for mass immigration, for the sole purpose of changing Britains ethnic makeup, and purposely hid this fact from the public, it became known that an eastern European Jewish immigrant; Barbara Roche was responsible for introducing the new policy in the year 2.000.

Note particularly the role of Barbara Roche, a passionate cheerleader for massive non-White immigration and the minister in charge of administering the new policy. The above link is to an amazing article by Andrew Neather (also mentioned by Weston as a villain) in which he discusses the secrecy that shrouded the plan to inundate the UK with immigrants. “There was paranoia about reaching the media.” Neather is positively giddy about the results. London is now a “much more interesting place.” And he is entirely comfortable with throwing the White working class under the bus. The report only mentioned social benefits for the immigrants, not the native Brits. And the Labour government was not keen about discussing the new policy with their White working class constituents: “While ministers may have been passionately in favour of a more diverse society, it wasn’t necessarily a debate they wanted to have in working men’s clubs in Sheffield or Sunderland.”

Right. Betrayal is best done in the shadows. Weston begins with a quote from Cicero that sums it up:

For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague. — Cicero

88 replies

Comments are closed.