Feeding the Dragon: The Left Want Power and Revenge, Not Equality and Justice

Rights for snakes! Yes, imagine that the Western world is swept by a movement for the liberation of snakes, spiders, scorpions and all other creatures whose naturally gentle and harmless natures have been corrupted by millennia of human bigotry and mistreatment. Tough laws are passed making it an offence to discriminate against these historically oppressed animal groups, which begin to enter buildings, cars and all other human spaces in ever larger numbers.

Mad to the Max

After several decades of this snake, spider and scorpion “uplift,” a conservative writer publishes a book called The Madness of Mandibles in which he ponders why snakes, spiders and scorpions are biting and stinging people more than ever, despite being given all they could ever have wished for. “They’ve been granted equality, so why aren’t they behaving like humans?” the conservative writer asks in bewilderment.

The Madness of Crowds by Douglas Murray

That’s a ridiculous scenario, of course. A conservative writer would never be so stupid. Or would he? I have my doubts, because I’ve based that scenario on a real conservative writer called Douglas Murray, who has just published a book called The Madness of Crowds that seems to be pretty much as stupid as The Madness of Mandibles. Murray’s book was reviewed by the part-Jewish political scientist Eric Kaufman in the Financial Times:

How did our societies become so insane? In The Madness of Crowds, Murray argues that it’s because highly educated people cling to a new religion known variously as “social justice”, “identity politics” or “intersectionality”. Essentially this is the old Marxist faith poured from the class bottle into the race-sex-gender one. Meaning is realised through struggle against those who commit wrongthink.

Identity politics helped reduce prejudice but, having vanquished its foe, began manufacturing phantom enemies. Murray, following the late conservative political theorist Kenneth Minogue, dubs this “St George in retirement” syndrome. Having slain the dragon, he charges off in pursuit of ever-smaller ones and ends by “swinging his sword at thin air, imagining it to contain dragons”. (The Madness of Crowds by Douglas Murray – Slay the dragon, then stop, The Financial Times, 11th October 2019)

As you can see, Kaufman’s review has the subtitle of “Slay the dragon, then stop.” That is Murray’s injunction to the practitioners of “identity politics.” Once they’d slain the dragon of injustice and oppression, they should have stopped their campaigning and become good little liberally democratic boys and girls (and trans-boys, trans-girls, gender-fluids, etc).

No mistakes by the left

But was this ever a realistic expectation? No, it wasn’t. It’s deeply stupid to think that feminists, Black liberationists, LGBTQ+-rights campaigners et al would ever have “slain the dragon and stopped.” It’s also deeply misleading to summarize what went wrong in that way. The left were never pursuing equality and justice: they were always pursuing power and revenge. The left have never made any mistakes in their pursuit of power: it’s the right who have made all the mistakes. That’s why Murray’s injunction should gone like this: “Feed the dragon, then expect it to stop breathing fire.” Even conservatives could understand that this is stupid advice. Feeding dragons only encourages them. They won’t stop breathing fire, eating virgins and wreaking havoc. On the contrary: they’ll do all of those things more than ever.

No, George! You’re supposed to feed it, not spear it!

Similarly, non-Whites and other “oppressed” groups won’t stop attacking White society as they’re given more power and privilege within it. Millions of deluded American Whites voted for the narcissistic non-entity Barack Obama in the hope that his presidency would create a “post-racial” America where the noble dreams of the plagiarist and rape-enthusiast Martin Luther King would finally be realized. And what did those deluded Whites get in return for their votes? They got Black Lives Matter and an ever-increasing campaign of anti-White violence and vilification. And the violence against Whites highlights another stupidity in Douglas Murray’s — and Kenneth Minogue’s — arguments. The left aren’t suffering from “St George in retirement” syndrome and they aren’t “swinging” their swords “at thin air, imagining it to contain dragons.”

Beaten to death with hammers

No, they’re swinging their swords at real people who suffer real consequences. Just ask James Watson, Richard Lynne, Jason Richwine, Charles Murray, Noah Carl, and others on the ever-lengthening list of mostly White, mostly male bad-thinkers who have been punished with the loss of employment, income and reputation for making entirely reasonable and scientifically credible comments about the differing average abilities of Blacks and Whites or men and women. In many other cases, you can’t ask the victims about the real consequences of the left’s “sword-swinging,” because the victims are dead. As Steve Sailer has pointed out, Black Lives Matter (BLM) has helped bring about thousands of extra murders by promoting the false idea that the American police are slaughtering “Black Bodies” on a horrific scale for despicably racist reasons. Sailer has also discussed other victims of BLM’s self-righteous and self-serving nonsense, like the White man in St. Louis who was beaten to death with hammers “by Youth of Color shouting ‘Kill the white people’ in a post-Ferguson wilding.”

The mainstream media don’t care about that kind of explicit anti-White violence, and they care even less about the implicit anti-White violence also discussed by Sailer:

A [Black] Houston armored car robber [called Redrick “Red” Batiste] invented a new wrinkle to speed things up: just immediately kill the messenger carrying the bag of money without asking him to put his hands up. … The total number of homicides in the US went up over 24% from 2014 to 2016. One theory is that policemen were discouraged by all the animosity directed against them. But another would be that the Great Awokening encouraged black criminals, like this fairly intelligent guy [Redrick Batiste], to be more homicidal [against Whites]. (Three Victims of the Great Awokening, The Unz Review, 20th September 2019)

When Blacks behave worse than Whites, leftists don’t care.

Leftism is based on lies and fantasies, which is why there is such a big gap between leftist ideology and leftist behaviour. Leftists claim to believe in equality, but in fact they have a hierarchy of superior and inferior groups. So they will ignore bad behaviour by superior groups, like Blacks, while inventing bad behaviour by inferior groups, like Whites. When superior groups are under-represented in some setting, this is irrefutable proof that White bigotry is holding them back. When superior groups are over-represented, on the other hand, leftists suddenly abandon their belief in equality.

Whites are sinners, non-Whites are saints

For example, women are over-represented at American universities, Blacks are over-represented in American government jobs, and there was not a single representative of the White British majority carrying the Olympic flag at the London Olympics in 2012. Do leftists care about this “inequality” and “injustice”? No, not in the slightest. When superior groups are over-represented, leftists abandon their principles of equality and justice.

This is because those principles were never sincere in the first place. Leftist demands for “equality” and “justice” are merely a tactic in the leftist pursuit of power. After all, leftists can hardly be explicit about their real aims: “We want to crush our political enemies and punish them for their sins against us.” Douglas Murray and other conservatives are extremely naïve to take leftist rhetoric at face value. And worse than naïve, because one of the most successful writers of all time exposed the true nature of leftism long ago. In Animal Farm (1945), George Orwell satirized not only Soviet Communism but also its many supporters in the West. Orwell’s novella describes how the animals of Manor Farm overthrow their human oppressors in the name of the principle “All animals are equal.” But after the Revolution, the principle is overturned by the clever and cunning pigs, who represent the bureaucratic elite identified by the former Trotskyist James Burnham (1905-87) at the heart of modern leftism:

And finally there was a tremendous baying of dogs and a shrill crowing from the black cockerel, and out came Napoleon [the chief pig] himself, majestically upright, casting haughty glances from side to side, and with his dogs gambolling round him.

He carried a whip in his trotter.

There was a deadly silence. Amazed, terrified, huddling together, the animals watched the long line of pigs march slowly round the yard. … Benjamin [the donkey] felt a nose nuzzling at his shoulder. He looked round. It was Clover [the horse]. Her old eyes looked dimmer than ever. Without saying anything, she tugged gently at his mane and led him round to the end of the big barn, where the Seven Commandments were written. For a minute or two they stood gazing at the tatted wall with its white lettering.

“My sight is failing,” she said finally. “Even when I was young I could not have read what was written there. But it appears to me that that wall looks different. Are the Seven Commandments the same as they used to be, Benjamin?”

For once Benjamin consented to break his rule, and he read out to her what was written on the wall. There was nothing there now except a single Commandment. It ran:



EQUAL THAN OTHERS (Animal Farm, chapter X)

That is a perfect summary of what leftists really believe: “All humans are equal, but some humans are more equal than others.” In other words, the leftist demand for equality and justice is not sincere. Identity politics was never intended to make Blacks equal to Whites or women equal to men or homosexuals equal to straights. No, it was intended to make Blacks, women and homosexuals superior to their alleged oppressors — or rather, to make the self-appointed representatives of those groups superior. Black Lives Matter claims to be campaigning for equality and justice, but it hasn’t benefited ordinary Blacks. Quite the contrary: it has sent thousands more of them to the graveyard.

Better than Orwell

And the graveyard is also where Western Civilization is heading if leftists are allowed to have their way. By spreading mistaken ideas about leftism, Douglas Murray and other conservatives have actually become its allies. But this is exactly what you should expect of the political movement falsely known as “conservatism,” as was pointed out by Robert Lewis Dabney (1820-98), a theologian from the American South. Dabney is much less known than Orwell but was possibly even more insightful about politics and human psychology. It is astonishing to think that this anti-conservative polemic of his dates from 1871:

It may be inferred again that the present movement for women’s rights will certainly prevail from the history of its only opponent, Northern conservatism. This is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation.

What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is today one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will tomorrow be forced upon its timidity and will be succeeded by some third revolution; to be denounced and then adopted in its turn. American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt bath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it be salted?

Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious for the sake of the truth, and has no idea of being guilty of the folly of martyrdom. It always, when about to enter a protest, very blandly informs the wild beast whose path it essays to stop, that its “bark is worse than its bite,” and that it only means to save its manners by enacting its decent role of resistance. The only practical purpose which it now subserves in American politics is to give enough exercise to Radicalism to keep it “in wind,” and to prevent its becoming pursy and lazy from having nothing to whip.

No doubt, after a few years, when women’s suffrage shall have become an accomplished fact, conservatism will tacitly admit it into its creed, and thenceforward plume itself upon its wise firmness in opposing with similar weapons the extreme of baby suffrage; and when that too shall have been won, it will be heard declaring that the integrity of the American Constitution requires at least the refusal of suffrage to asses. There it will assume, with great dignity, its final position. – Robert Lewis Dabney, 1871 (As quoted by Vox Day in “Bowties on the historical battlefield,” Vox Popoli blog, 29th September 2019)

Conservatives like Douglas Murray are behaving in exactly the same way well over a century later: constantly retreating before the forces they claim to oppose. They feed the dragon and expect it to stop breathing fire. Leftists and their favoured groups will never stop attacking Whites and their other alleged oppressors, because they do not want equality and justice. They want power over and revenge on those whom they hate. And if you don’t recognize the true malevolent nature of leftism, you have no hope of defeating it.

44 replies
  1. Pat Etheridge
    Pat Etheridge says:

    Yes, this has all been clear for some time, to those with eyes to see: “They” plan only our extinction, the obliteration of our world. Since “they” are winning, and at a very speedy pace, this places us in a very dire predicament, one which almost certainly will not be overcome except through an ugly responding radicalism. As Guillaume Faye wrote: “When we must choose between extinction and violence, what choice do we have except to pray for violence?”

    • Pat Etheridge
      Pat Etheridge says:

      This essay also brings to mind an epiphany I had two decades ago. It suddenly became clear to me that the goal was not access to institutions and parity — as was repeatedly stated. The goal is to obtain power in the societal institutions and to reinvent them or to assume power in them. And where are our champions in all of this? They’re missing in action. Learning Spanish and donning yarmulkes and turbans, and giving the interlopers buttock massages.

    • Joe
      Joe says:

      “Force must be met with equal or greater force.” There is no other solution. The Left NEVER cedes one inch of their illogically-gotten gains. NEVER. Only the Right acquiesces at every turn.

      It’s time for the adults to reclaim the house from the spoiled and naive brats.

  2. Mike
    Mike says:

    In 1555 England’s leading intellectuals at Oxford burnt two bishops and the Archbishop of Canterbury at the stake – see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_Martyrs. In 1536 William Tyndale [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Tyndale ] was strangled then burnt because he translated the Bible, making it possible for people to read it.

    Now our intellectual betters treat Christianity with contempt but they push Global Warming, saying something must be done NOW. That story is based on deep ignorance.

    At this time the UK Parliament is a mutinous assemblage betraying the public and democracy regarding Brexit for reasons it does not seem to know or understand. But perhaps that is off topic.

    • Wonkey Donkey
      Wonkey Donkey says:

      Not at all off topic; Murrey is as thick as thieves with the lot of `em.
      Muslim versus Christian as Shlomo rubs his hands together, looking on…

    • Charles Frey
      Charles Frey says:

      Mike, nothing is ” off topic ” in this FULL SPECTRUM ASSAULT on us; from the lowest community college ” Journalist “, to Tweedle Dee [R] and Tweedle Dum [D], both run out of J.P. Morgan’s law firm in Manhattan as Presidential nominees: according to Carroll Quigley in his 1300 pp TRAGEDY AND HOPE: itself taken off the shelves and having its printing plates destroyed by McMillan Publisher, owned by mega fraudster and of course MP, Robert Maxwell, [ aka Jan Ludvik Hyman Binyamin Hoch ].

      And, while you are likely informed about the above, are you aware of the SATANIC CHILDREN’S MINISTRY OF KNOXVILLE ???

      It is the duty of every reader here to inform themselves of this additional FULL SPECTRUM ASSAULT. Anything other than ” off topic ” !

      • TJ
        TJ says:

        UNCENSORED! Tragedy & Hope: A History of the World in Our Time by Carroll Quigley is the ultimate insider admission of a secret global elite that has impacted nearly every modern historical event. Learn how the Anglo-American banking elite were able to secretly establish and maintain their global power. This massive hardcover book of 1348 pages provides a detailed world history beginning with the industrial revolution and imperialism through two world wars, a global depression and the rise of communism. Tragedy & Hope is the definitive work on the world’s power structure and an essential source material for understanding the history, goals and actions of the New World Order. THE ONLY AUTHORIZED VERSION AFTER 1ST PRINT.

        Available from Amazon, $28.17 hardcover


    • David Ashton
      David Ashton says:

      The library called The Bible is in two main parts. With very few notable exceptions Jews reject the second part as a supersession and many see it as ipso facto anti-Semitic. This “New Testament” contains passages in Matthew, John, Acts and Pauline epistles that are regarded not only as anti-Jewish but as original fuel for a “longest hatred” that “led” to the “Holocaust”. It is a paradox that Christian Zionists in their apocalyptic support for Israel ignore this sentiment among Jews.

      A further paradox is that the questionable religious history in the first part (OT or Tanakh) is used by secular “non-observant” Jews as a justification for the location and expansion of the territory of Israel. However, these texts support the concept of a divinely chosen people, to which all nations of the world must eventually pay tribute, but despite some local ethnocides, the Hebrew scriptures do not support the notion, sometimes advanced here, that the people(s) known as Jews seek literally to exterminate other nations, least of all the “white”-skinned (post)Christian peoples who provide majority sustenance for the problematic minority. Cf. e.g. Rabbi Sacks, Ilana Mercer and the Gatestone Institute on the white/coloured birth-rate.

      Douglas Murray is a homosexual sympathetic to Jews but I do not think he is himself Jewish. He has referred to Barbara Lerner Spectre, whose Swedish institution is “lacking credibility” to say the least as violence from immigrants disturbs the complacent order of that northern nation.

      Some comments on TOO are often so OTT that they cannot be taken seriously as a guide to action.

      • TJ
        TJ says:

        “Rabbi Sacks” is spelled SACHS.

        This site is supposed to be by and for folks whose minds are in razor-sharp focus, having maximum objectivity.

        These “minor” spelling and grammar errors indicate weak cognition. . .I’m not talking about occasional typos. . .

        • David Ashton
          David Ashton says:

          No, Sacks is the spelling that former Chief Rabbi Baron Jonathan Sacks uses. Check his references online and the books he has written.

          Razor-sharp objective minds on TOO are OK by me. Apologies also welcome.

      • Eric
        Eric says:

        David Ashton: The Jews do seek to exterminate white people. They are behind the flooding of white countries with non-whites. They have been working for over 100 years to accomplish their desired genocide of white people and Christians. The two world wars that they played a key role in fomenting, the Bolshevik Revolution and its aftermath, the treatment of Germany after WW II, the destruction of South Africa as a prosperous white-ruled nation, and the mass migration of today, have all been part of their genocidal program.

        In addition to the above, the Jews have tried to weaken white nations in a variety of ways — by promoting degeneracy, cultural Marxism, discrimination against whites, attacks on the family (feminism) and traditional values, driving Christianity out of the public square, etc.

        • David Ashton
          David Ashton says:

          That many usually non-observant secularised Jews have played a noticeable part in most of the adverse developments you list is undeniable, though other Jews have taken a different stand. The concept of a pre-planned and consciously organised “genocidal program” by an entire ethnic collective is imposed on the events you mentioned, not deduced from them, some of which have explanations that do not fit the simplistic notion of an over-arching deliberate conspiracy. Take one example: “the Jews fomented WW1” – many factors beside them were involved, though Zionists intervened with a bargain to bring to USA into the conflict.

      • Trenchant
        Trenchant says:

        Gatestone Institute’s real focus is on Israel, whose survival depends on whites. To that end, it hides the Jewish hand in the immigration of non-whites and especially Muslims to the West, and, at the same time, exaggerates the present threat of same (many of the terror events are either State-sponsored false flags or hoaxes). This, to align whites with Israel by emphasizing the common enemy and assure participation in future Middle Eastern military adventures.

        • David Ashton
          David Ashton says:

          Gatestone is pro-Israel, I know, but its articles and statistics on race replacement are quite useful.

          • Trenchant
            Trenchant says:

            Except that they identify the obvious, proximate cause and hide less obvious, ultimate cause of said replacement. Again, channeling nativist dissatisfaction towards solidarity with the ME hegemon and its wars of conquest.

  3. Richard B
    Richard B says:

    “Essentially this is the old Marxist faith poured from the class bottle into the race-sex-gender one. Meaning is realised through struggle against those who commit wrongthink.
    Identity politics helped reduce prejudice but, having vanquished its foe, began manufacturing phantom enemies.”

    This is called a paralogism, an unconscious violation of one’s own logic.

    First, Identity Politics did not reduce prejudice, it increased it.
    Second, how could it have reduced prejudice if, by Murray’s own reasoning in the previous paragraph, it put (“Marxist) faith” over practical reason?

    Speaking of paralogisms, is it wise to put “reduced” and “vanquished” in the same sentence?

    Few writers have the temerity, or blockheadedness, to publish anything without having someone else go over what they’ve written. They should be just as discriminating with their logic and reasoning. Because one follows the other (or is the other). Human error not withstanding, well-written IS well-reasoned. 

    “Slay the dragon, then stop.”  Or, meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.

    With every revolution we end up with the same thing we started with. This is why the only sensible and practical answer to the mindless Rinse and Repeat of “Revolution” is Cultural Transcendence.

    This is why the Left couldn’t stop after having slain “the dragon of justice and oppression.” This is why all arguments that support revolution are self-refuting and self-discrediting and why, the more knowledge we gain of ourselves, the more we can see that our inability to free ourselves from this repetition compulsion is why the human mind is literally insane. 

    The human mind is literally insane because it confuses human interests with absolute truth. Instead of identifying human interests as the primary means of adapting oneself to the environment, and visa versa. 

    The Left’s brand of insanity takes the form of saying “You’re evil because you won’t let us do to you what we think you’ve done to us.”

    They’re insane because they converted their precious cultural relativism into a moral absolute, without a catch in the throat. Just as their political utopia turned into a bloody dictatorship during The French Revolution without ever changing its belief-system! 

    And the Right’s insane because it continues to engage (indulge) with crazy people. Even the otherwise very sensible and unquestionably brave (at least to some extent) Tucker Carlson does this. This is why “The left have never made any mistakes in their pursuit of power: it’s the right who have made all the mistakes.”

    Actually, the Right has made one big mistake, one that subsumes “all the mistakes.” Their one big mistake is in not, once and for all, transcending the Right/Left paradigm. The common bond is the form of thinking. Both think constitutively, as opposed to instrumentally. Both fail to see that human interests are not synonymous with ulimate truth. 

    But, above all, the Right fails to see that nothing good will come from conflating White with Right. Nothing – ever. Right-wing thinking always ends in the same cul-de-sac. After that they’re like fish in a barrel. Caught in a trap of their own making the Right is powerless over the Left who are now free to sadistically pick them off, one by one (Schaeffer Cox) or in groups (C’ville).

    The Right is not long for this world unless it stops confusing ideology with Race. But, if it transcended its own worldview and abandoned the Right all together it’d be in a much better position to defeats the enemy and move into a larger freedom – or die trying. The possibility does have its charms. Because there’s nothing noble in dying for a lost cause.

    The Right has to accept complete defeat. But Whites don’t. 

    • Doubt
      Doubt says:

      “With every revolution we end up with the same thing we started with”

      Pretty sure the ghosts of the Russian Tsar, his wife and his daughters (shot and bayoneted by jews/bosleheviks) would disagree vehemently!
      Not to be mean, but yours is a rather trite cliché that isn’t even true.

      “But, above all, the Right fails to see that nothing good will come from conflating White with Right. Nothing – ever. Right-wing thinking always ends in the same cul-de-sac.”

      You’re going to have to flesh out that boney arsed hypothesis a bit more before I dignify it with a response!

  4. Eric
    Eric says:

    Conservatism has now morphed from impotence to outright collaboration with the Left. The conservatism presented by Turning Point USA and its leader Charlie Kirk to college students is anti-white, in favor of mass non-white immigration, pro Israel, and pro-degeneracy.

    But there is a silver lining to this cloud. Thanks to Nick Fuentes and his “Groyper revolution”, Charlie Kirk’s conservative college student audiences are in open revolt. Turning Point chapters at two universities have dissolved themselves. At Ohio State, student questioners pinned Kirk down, denouncing his support for Israel, referencing the “the five dancing Israelis” of 9/11 and the attack on the U.S.S. Liberty, asking how promoting anal sex advanced the conservative cause (Kirk’s guest was a gay black veteran), asking about working class and middle class whites losing jobs and having their wages depressed thanks to immigration and job offshoring, denouncing Conservative Inc.’s ridiculous claim that non-whites will eventually vote for Republicans and conservatives so that mass non-white immigration is okay and anyone who objects to it is a racist, etc.

    Not only Kirk, but Republican Rep. Dan Crenshaw (John McCain II), has encountered similar resistance. He’s a “war hero” with an eye patch, but the kids aren’t intimidated by that anymore.

    The reaction to the Groypers was predictable and straight out of the Left’s identity politics playbook: “You’re a racist, a Nazi, an anti-Semite…” But the students didn’t buy it. So the “big guns” were called out. Ben Shapiro decided to rewrite a speech he had put together at the last minute and instead “debate” Nick Fuentes at Stanford — only Nick wasn’t there to respond to Shapiro’s strawman arguments. The Stanford audience had no idea what Shapiro was talking about. Then Vincent James put together a collection of clips in which Shapiro contradicts Shapiro.

    Today, Donald Trump Jr. and Kimberly Guilfoyle appeared with Kirk at UCLA. When they said no audience questions would be allowed (fearing that Groypers would embarrass them yet again), the audience erupted into pandemonium, with people shouting “Q AND A, Q AND A” — at which point Kirk’s no-doubt-planted shills tried to drown that out with chants of “USA, USA.”

    Poor Donald, Jr. An event featuring him that was supposed to last a couple of hours was cut short to a half hour. Kirk and Guilfoyle were booed off the stage.

    It looks like a revolution is starting, led by Catholics like Nick Fuentes and E. Michael Jones. The “alt right” got battered at Charlottesville, but I think a comeback is in the works. The revolution begins by destroying cuck-servatism — which perfectly conforms to Lenin’s dictum: “To control the opposition, you have to be the opposition”.

    • Eric
      Eric says:

      To follow up, the Groyper Revolution has degenerated into a battle between race realists and Christians (as though you can’t be both). This always seems to happen. We are still lacking leadership that can unite all the white factions.

  5. Kenan
    Kenan says:

    Why is it that nobody recognizes the so called human made climate change as the most prevalent and dominant marxist racket nowadays? Very strange indeed.

      • David Ashton
        David Ashton says:

        I share your recommendation of Quigley’s books, two of which I bought as soon as published. His book on the evolution of civilizations is worth reading, though I would add the refinement of Jim Penman’s “Biohistory”. The whole world, and everything important or unpleasant that happens, is not run by “the Jews” nor by Quigley’s “Anglo-Saxons”, but I think the world would have been better off if the white nations had united to retain their supremacy just over a century ago.

  6. sluggo
    sluggo says:

    It gives me little satisfaction to say it, but this is the argument I have been using for DECADES! “Conservatives” conserve nothing. Voting for them, as I do, means only seeing America being given away in trickles rather than a flood. Now, as the entire Republican party has decided to put Israel first, over America, and due to the hatred of
    all White peoples of the earth by the Jews…as stated by their rabbis, and in their Talmud… the trickle is now a flood, of destruction, witnessed by the One World government which the Zionists believe.in, and promote…since they have proclaimed themselves the “Chosen People”, as written in their fantasy books…that they, themselves wrote. Israel has representatives in ALL the White European countries promoting black, sub Saharan barbarians, as well as those from the muslim middle east, as well as the near savages below America’s southern border, be forcibly allowed entry into the White, Christian, peaceful nations of the world, in their racist, Kalergian agenda to mix all the races…except for their own Jewish race, that is…into one shit colored, non diverse race because they truly believe that that particular race of people, due to their lowered IQ, and lack of any culture to hold on to, will be easier to manage, much like a herd of cattle.

    The White peoples of the world have much diversity in their people, countries and cultures, unlike those of Africa, the Middle East muslims, and the South and Central American brown people do, and those delightful differences of our White cultures and countries…and people… SHOULD be preserved. That can only be accomplished, and maintained, through White nationalism of each White country, where WE are free to enforce our established borders, and decide WHO and how many acceptable foreigners we will allow to enter…and that should be limited to a very, very small number of those seeking entry. We…none of us…are required to allow ANY “immigrants” to enter our countries, and WE should ALL immediately stop ALL immigration, deport ALL illegals NOW, and establish a decade long moratorium on ALL entry.

    We owe these people nothing, and if they choose to continue to over breed that is their problem, and we have no reason to feel any “guilt” at all. If we are to survive as a race, as individual countries, and as delightfully different cultures, we must STOP believing the incessant brainwashing of the communist liberals of the world…including Israel…who only wish to bring destruction to White cultures, countries, and our very race of people…as the racist, White people hating Israeli woman working in Stockholm, Sweden, Barbara Specter said….”we must do away with the so called White race”. The globalists, the United Nations, and Israel are all working at a feverish pace to destroy all White nations and establish a One World government, based in Jerusalem, and run by the “chosen people”, with ONLY one army, and one world police force…all controlled by the Jewish race, of course.

    To say that anyone who criticizes Israel, or the globalist Zionists trying to take over the world is anti Semitic, is like saying that criticizing the mafia is equivalent to being anti Italian…it’s false, dishonest, and it’s a Jewish, Zionist lie continued on the back of an exaggerated holocaust story.

    P.S. The Israelis have a nuclear plan in place called “The Samson Option”, that comes into play should Israel ever feel that their survival is at stake. They have nuclear weapons aimed at ALL the capitals of Europe, and America, no doubt, and this plan was actually used as a threat to Kissinger and President Nixon for more military aid during the 1973 Yom Kipper War. Israel is no friend of America…Israel is FOR Israel only.

  7. Panadechi
    Panadechi says:

    The weapon of forced diversity operates as dilution and demoralization of whites. The most powerful social node is the ethnic and our enemies know it. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the social node of the whites, whether in communities of all kinds, allocation of resources, strategies and planning objectives. Finally demoralize our opponents with subversive psychological warfare against them. Union make force.
    A commission of expert strategists must be created to devise, finance, execute and implement measures for this purpose. It is a matter of survival. The enemy Zion must not be made aware.

  8. Joshua Laskin
    Joshua Laskin says:

    To what is the hate a reaction? If I intend to persecute or abuse someone somehow, then I can expect their hate in return. If there are ‘crimes’, which are minority lifestyle-choices that the majority wants to suppress through punishment; to protect their own comfort; then those who are the victims of unjust punishment will learn to hate their oppressors. Freedom means allowing some people to make other people uncomfortable. Freedom doesn’t mean I get to impose my values on other people. So, some of the hate is well deserved. Having said that, however, I certainly think it wise not to trust the Left to not throw the democracy out with the bathwater. Hate, however deserved, is no medium for wisdom.

  9. Tom
    Tom says:

    This article comprises a well-reasoned and in my mind an unassailable argument by Mr. Langdon. But it certainly won’t sway a leftist. In fact, it wouldn’t even sway a current American liberal set on voting for any Democrat for any position of government. While there are many crises facing the west, the major crisis is one of plain old stupidity. The west is now filled with too many stupid people.

  10. David Ashton
    David Ashton says:

    Murray: never look a gift horse in the mouth.

    Faye: what sort of violence against precisely whom and with what result?

    For nearly 20 years I have frequently posted on websites like American Renaissance, three recommendations for any younger intelligent people to follow: 1. Have more healthy white babies. 2. Secure and defend the western heritage. 3. Master the technology as well as content of cyberspace.

    Violence against the nearest rabbi, imam, rapper and communist is NOT an answer but part of the problem.

  11. JRM
    JRM says:

    Excellent points made in this piece.

    re: BLM and protests about “unfair policing”, the real action, for Leftists (the kind of Leftists who thrive in the very Big Cities you would expect to find them in), is in absolving blacks of the requirement to obey the law.

    There are Leftist efforts ongoing now, demanding “disinvestment” from “mass incarceration”, an end to the “school-to-prison pipeline” and a moratorium on the construction of any new prisons (“if you build it, they will fill it”).

    The principles they trumpet are all about redressing institutional inequalities and moral failings. The real goal: place blacks above the law.

    In the new Leftist Utopia, blacks will commit crimes and suffer no unpleasant consequences. This goal reflects the love the (((Left))) has for raw black primitivism, and unleashes massive amounts of suffering and hardship on the reviled Whites.

    The Left has a near-death wish level infatuation with black criminality; they obviously get a charge from the dangerous and undisciplined approach to life displayed by the Negro. The recent articles on Fay Stender displayed this predilection in action. But the real icing on the cake is striking fear into the White populace. I guess the thinking goes that given enough free ranging black criminals, the Revolution will be de facto accomplished.

  12. RoyAlbrecht
    RoyAlbrecht says:

    When raising children, the first goal to strive for above all others is Spiritual Enlightenment.
    S. E.-ened youth are able to comprehend with accelerated insight and heightened energy over their Unenlightened ethnic kin.
    Fearlessness is a major obstacle to success.
    As a Spiritually Enlightened, Self-motivated and “Uber-able” individual, going up against bad odds (5:1 or greater) begins to feel like the only way that a fight seems fair.
    Elitism, both in practice (meritocracy) and in outlook, within a framework of other like minded childhood friends is also very important. Without a core group of people working together, (((Leftists))) can pick off single targets of obstruction much easier.
    I have seen YouTube videos of Russian gang youth going up against Islamic gang youth in a street fights. The odds were about even at 20:20, but the Russians completely destroyed the Islamics and would have done so with merely 10:20.
    If these same youth had been S.E. Russian youth, I estimate that 5:20 odds would still have been sufficient to win the day.
    This is so important when doing battle with the Left, because Leftists are cowards and inadequate in almost every respect.
    Only by Jew-funded, Rent-a-crowd numbers are they able to overwhelm their outnumbered Rightist counter protesters.
    Soon, like Nazis in present Germany, the Left learn very quickly…, Do Not F*** with the Nazis. These are the fanatical of the fanatics of the Right.

  13. Robertson
    Robertson says:

    Unfortunately, the political party that should be the one to point all this out, the GOP, is useless.

    At best, it pushes back against the Leftist agenda but it’s like sticking your finger in a dam to stop a leak.

    What society in its right mind would allow a court to decide that men should be able to marry men?

    What country in its right mind would allow men to go into a women’s restroom, locker room, or shower room just because the man claims he identifies as a female?

    What country in its right mind would allow the Jewish lobby to dictate its foreign policy?

    And the Jewish lobby is also in part behind the left’s domestic agenda: LGBTQ, identity politics, illegal immigration.

  14. Max West
    Max West says:

    “Feeding dragons only encourages them. They won’t stop breathing fire, eating virgins and wreaking havoc. On the contrary: they’ll do all of those things more than ever.”

    Hence, the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the 1965 Voting Rights Act, & LBJ’s plethora of Great Society / “War on Poverty” programs (e.g., AFDC, food stamps, other welfare programs; affirmative action) didn’t calm them down… it only empowered them, leading to the riots in Watts (1965), The Long Hot Summer of 1967 (riots in Newark, Detroit, Cincinnati, etc); and many more.


  15. Fenria
    Fenria says:

    Conservatives are tone deaf to the point of cringey embarrassment. Their hopeless, pie eyed dreams of the Norman Rockwell civic nationalism depicted in idealistic early 1900’s oil paintings is every bit as saccharine sweet and ersatz as the liberal’s notion of the “we are the world” family. Conservatives can’t put away the idea that every black man has a budding Thomas Sowell inside him just waiting to break out, if only he could consume just enough conservative ideology to birth that perfect black specimen of white conservative dreams.

    Modern conservativism is just neoliberalism viewed from the moderate, jewish “right”. It’s eternally safe, has washed its hands of prickly topics such as race, IQ, and natural inequality, and in the process has become a toothless, powerless laughing stock relic of its former self. It has become associated with generations of old farts who wave the flag, watch football, and then go mow the lawn. Who dutifully vote for the selected Republican candidate, and then grouse harmlessly for years about how nothing ever changes, or slavishly “trust the plan”. Conservativism is exactly where the left wants us to be; ineffectual, utterly naive, and above all, pre-occupied, which is why we’re still seeing memes of Hillary Clinton long after she has become a non issue.

    Conservatives are a joke. Join that camp if you specifically want to do nothing, and have the demise of your people continue on unabated.

    • Luke
      Luke says:

      It pleases me enormously to see this well deserved criticism of Douglas Murray. I recently listened to an interview he did with some moderately Nationalist oriented web podcast host, and he made it very clear that he was no ally of anyone in the pro-White, pro-White European survival movement. He’s pushing approximately the same kind of leftist agenda that the TPUSA gang of Judas Goats are struggling to sell to the base Trump supporters.

      Secondly, I agree with Fenria – Conservatives are a joke. I would also like to point out that it was Alex Linder’s idea that pro-White movement people should focus their most aggressive attacks on Conservatives – because, as Linder correctly stated, Conservatives who have been selling out their own people for the last 60 plus years – are really our #1 enemy.

  16. Wee Willy
    Wee Willy says:

    No doubt, after a few years, when women’s suffrage shall have become an accomplished fact, conservatism will tacitly admit it into its creed, and thenceforward plume itself upon its wise firmness in opposing with similar weapons the extreme of baby suffrage; and when that too shall have been won, it will be heard declaring that the integrity of the American Constitution requires at least the refusal of suffrage to asses. There it will assume, with great dignity, its final position. – Robert Lewis Dabney, 1871

    How prophetic; children and asses – their ultimate fantasy ?

  17. cecil1
    cecil1 says:

    See, Murray and the like aren’t making arguments to defend Western civilization, to ensure a demographic future, or to win.

    They are writing to look good and have social success.

    Until you grasp the difference, and the sellout at best, and treason at worst, it involves, you don’t see why Murray and others continue to be so ‘confused’ while writing endless books.

    • Pat Etheridge
      Pat Etheridge says:

      Conservatism began to enfeeble itself when it imbibed a poison handed to it by Leftists called “universalism.” In reality, no two things on earth are entirely equal to one another, and it has been a denial of this truth that has placed Western societies on the path to their funeral pyres.

    • David Ashton
      David Ashton says:

      @ Mr cecil1

      Traitor? This is a bit unfair to Murray and his public statements against non-western mass-immigration, against “political correctness” and its political establishment. His “Strange Death of Europe” is not as radical as tracts by Renaud Camus or Markus Willinger, but it has filled a void in Britain. A stepping stone.

      “Il meglio e l’inimico del bene” (Voltaire)

  18. Charles Frey
    Charles Frey says:

    No one could make this up. Google “Satanic Children’s Mission of Knoxville” : with their tendentious, revealing own web site, cum mission statement.

    You might even venture a mere guess as to its pushers, probably at home in its upscale Oakwood district.

  19. J.L. Grant
    J.L. Grant says:

    Indeed, they want power and revenge, very much as portrayed in Ward Kendall’s seminal novel, “Hold Back This Day”.

  20. Armor
    Armor says:

    “Conservatives like Douglas Murray” / “constantly retreating before the forces they claim to oppose” / “the true malevolent nature of leftism”

    The real opposition is not between left and right, but between the Jewish dominated malevolent FAR-LEFT on the one hand, with its control on the media and the institutions, and on the other hand, normal well-meaning people, from both left and right. Most White people on the left and right have the same flaws: gullibility, conformism, cowardice. Left-wing voters are especially conformist. Right-wing voters are a little smarter and more realistic. But all of them are very similar people, compared to the malevolent far-left. The far-left is not really left-wing. Their aim is to destroy us, not to achieve equality. And the leaders of right-wing political parties are not right-wing. They want to destroy us too.

    “leftists can hardly be explicit about their real aims”

    The far-left cannot be explicit because its aim is to destroy us. By contrast, most left-wing voters don’t want to destroy us, but they lack intellectual coherence. They don’t want race replacement, but they won’t support anti-race-replacement activists. That is also true of many right-wing voters.

    “When [non-Whites] are over-represented, leftists abandon their principles of equality and justice.”

    They say they want equal representation in the name of racial justice. But they won’t allow us to criticize the wholesale replacement of White people in White countries. They say it is a terrible injustice if race replacement is not as fast in the top positions as in the streets. I would think the real crime is the replacement of White people! The migrants should be sent back: there would no longer be a problem of under-representation.

Comments are closed.