The Case for Secession

“Perhaps law-abiding states should bond together and form a Union of states that will abide by the constitution.”
Allen West, Chair, Texas GOP

Now that the Joe Biden-Kamala Harris regime and their Jewish entourage are measuring the curtains at the White House, it’s time to consider next steps.  As bad as things are for White America today, they are about to get a lot worse.  Physical, psychological, moral, and political threats hang over all our heads.  We are being dispossessed in our own nation.  The situation is grim but not hopeless.  We have options.

In the continental US, 24 states voted majority for Trump, including some of our most populous ones:  Texas, Florida, Ohio, and North Carolina, among them.  The 10 largest Trump states comprise over 100 million people, and all 24 combined are pushing 150 million.  This is a considerable block of people, with a considerable amount of power—political and otherwise.  If these people wish to retain a modicum of self-determination—not to mention self-respect—they will have to consider the strongest possible actions.  These actions include the possibility of literal secession from the United States.  It’s time to examine that option with all seriousness.

Biden’s Jewish-Diversity Retinue

First, let’s be clear about the threat posed by the incoming administration.  Even at this early point, it is clear that they hold an antipathy toward Whites, especially White males, and that they intend to either do as little as possible to support and represent White interests, or worse, to actively impede and harm those interests.  Of course, we don’t yet know what the actual policies will be, but we can make reasonable inferences based on who Biden has appointed to his Cabinet thus far.

Of his “top 16” picks to date, we find the following:  four White males (Brian Deese, Denis McDonough, Tom Vilsack, and Jake Sullivan); five Blacks, of whom four are women (Lloyd Austin, Marcia Fudge, Susan Rice, Cecilia Rouse, and Linda Thomas-Greenfield); one Indian woman (Neera Tander); one Hispanic man (Xavier Becerra)—and five Jews (Tony Blinken, Avril Haines, Ron Klain, Alejandro Mayorkas, and Janet Yellen).

Here we see a few points of interest.  First, there are no White women at all—given that Jews are not White, at least not in the relevant sense of identifying as part of the traditional White population of America.[1]  Second, Blacks and Jews each have more representation than Whites among the top 16, which is amazing in itself, given that Blacks (12.8%) and Jews (circa 2%) are distinct minorities in this country.  Third, at least one of the White men, Jake Sullivan, has proven himself to be remarkably philo-Semitic; his appointment “drew broad praise from Jewish leaders,” and his wife, Maggie Goodlander, worked extensively with influential Jews like Joe Lieberman, Stephen Breyer, and Merrick Garland (see here).  Fourth, we have an interesting “double-banger” in Mayorkas, who manages to be both Cuban and Jewish, thus checking two important boxes.  Fifth, by placing Yellen in charge of the US Treasury, Biden continues a long, nearly-unbroken line of Jews in charge of the top US financial institution.[2]

Furthermore, Biden has placed yet more Jews in important positions among his second tier.  These include the half-Jewish John Kerry (environmental advisor), Jared Bernstein (council of economic advisors), Rochelle Walensky (head of CDC), and Jeff Zients (Covid czar and “counsellor to the president”).

And then, of course, we have the infamous “family ties” among both Biden and Harris.  Biden’s three adult children all managed to acquire Jewish spouses:  Hunter married “filmmaker” Melissa Cohen in 2019, daughter Ashley married Howard Krein in 2012, and (the now-deceased) Beau married the Jewish dry-cleaning scion Hallie Olivere in 2002.  For her part, Kamala Harris married the Jewish lawyer Doug Emhoff in 2014, so we can be sure where her sympathies lie—as if there was any doubt.  Bottom line:  Look for lots of policies favoring Jews and Israelis, and little in the way of support for the 61% of Americans who are White.  Look for so-called open borders (i.e. very generous immigration and amnesty policies), for promotion of all kinds of ‘racial sensitivity’ awareness and training, and for increased attacks on “hate speech,” that is, on anything that the minority-laden Judeocracy decides that it doesn’t like.

What to do:  Independence!

Given all this, it is difficult to find a path forward for concerned Whites.  Their quality of life, their financial security, and their physical and mental health are all more or less guaranteed to decline over the coming four years.  As more Democratic-leaning minorities enter the country or are granted amnesty, and thus acquire voting rights, liberal-left anti-White policies will become more entrenched and more extreme.  This process will then accelerate over the next 25 years, as Whites become a numerical minority in the US—currently projected for around the year 2042.  Jewish influence will increase proportionately, given that they are by far the leading donors, and thus the leading wire-pullers, among the Democrats.

It is clear, then, that ordinary political means—the ballot box—will no longer suffice to promote White interests.  The political system is irrevocably slanted against Whites, and it will not change in our lifetimes; at least, not in the nation as it now exists.  Unless we consider radical structural change, anything like a present-day America is virtually certain to increasingly pander to Jewish and non-White interests, and therefore to suffer irrecoverable decline—socially, economically, culturally, intellectually, and morally. And it will become a very dangerous place for Whites as the coalition of the aggrieved wreaks vengeance.  Anything like the America that we knew in the 1950s and 1960s is done, over, finished.  The three seeds of its demise were planted many years ago:  in the African slave trade that made Blacks an astonishing 20% minority already in the 1770s; in the “all men are created equal” clause of the Declaration; and most of all, in the flood of Jewish immigrants circa 1900.  At that point, our fate was sealed.  It was only a matter of time.  Our end is now clearer than ever.  And it will not be a happy one for Whites.

As the South recognized long ago, the only hope for long-term salvation lies in political separation.  Had the Confederacy prevailed in the 1860s, the status of Southerners (and Northerners!) would be vastly higher than it is today.  It is one of the great tragedies of history that a power-mad Abraham Lincoln—a man who disliked Blacks and who actually, and correctly, sought to ship them back home to Africa[3]—decided to sacrifice thousands of his fellow countrymen simply to save “the nation.”  In the end, some 650,000 American soldiers on both sides died; this is more than the death toll from WWI, WWII, and the Vietnam War combined.  And this is not counting thousands of innocent civilians and slaves who also died, nor the many thousands left with crippling and debilitating injuries.  Lincoln was, without doubt, the biggest war criminal in American history.  We continue to pay the price to this day.

GOP-Texas leader Allen West, a Black American, was correct, then, in his recent pronouncement that the anti-Biden (I hesitate to call them pro-Trump) states ought to separate from the corrupt morass of Washington DC’s America and form a new, better union.  West considers them to be the Constitution-loving states, which is perhaps correct—although he should be careful there.  In the following I will depict an ideal Constitution for a new White republic — a Constitution that is, to be sure, far beyond the political sensibilities of the great majority of White Americans at the present time.

The core U.S. Constitution is a fairly useful document, but it is notably vague on who can vote and it is infinitely malleable via leftist machinations.  But at that time, in the 1780s, the vast majority of voters were White male landholders—which, tragically, allowed Jewish men to vote.  This problem must be fixed in the new nation that West envisions.  Also at first, as we know, women and Blacks could not vote.  As a new, White-friendly, anti-minority nation, this “new America” must certainly allow White women to vote, but it has no obligation to any minorities of any kind.  In fact, any clear-thinking and brave-hearted new nation would deny citizenship to all non-Whites: all Blacks, all Hispanics, all Asians, and all Jews.  It would end, and revoke existing, birthright citizenship.  All this is essential, if we want to get down to fundamental issues and to address the root causes of our present decay.  A properly-conceived and executed secession movement can address all these issues in a single stroke.

Some Open Questions

But there are many logistical problems here, obviously.  One is the matter of which states, precisely, would compose this new America.  As I mentioned at the outset, there were 24 Trump-voting states, comprising some 150 million people.  Further, with the exception of Alaska, they happen to be geographically contiguous, meaning that, in theory, they could unify and create a connected, single nation—one that would chop the remaining US into three or four separate blocks; but that’s their problem.  Additionally, we can well imagine that portions—perhaps the rural areas—of several nearby states would also like to join this newly-emergent nation.  Eastern and northern California, eastern Oregon and Washington, southern Illinois, Virginia south of the DC metro area, and parts of Colorado, New Mexico, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia, among others, may well choose to secede from their own state and join the “constitution-lovers.”  We can easily imagine the combined numbers approaching 200 million people in all.

Then there are further issues.  Given that Jews of all types will be violently opposed to this idea, we have to take into consideration the size of the Jewish population in each of these states.  Among the 24, Florida is the outlier; it has a large Jewish population, comprising around 4% of the total.  Of the remaining 23, only two (Ohio and Missouri) are over 1%, and of the rest, many are under 0.5%.  Consequently, Florida is unlikely to go along with a new, constitution-loving, pro-White nation.  Perhaps they will have to go it alone.

Along the same lines, large Hispanic populations, especially in Texas and Florida, will pose problems for a pro-White nation. But with significantly less clout than Jews, and without a Jewish lobby actively defending them, Hispanics will be out of luck.  Perhaps they will find it in their own best interests to return to Mexico or Latin America—places that would welcome their relatively advanced education, skills, and comparative wealth.

There is a third problematic group, and that is Christian Zionists.  If it’s true that up to 25% of American adults consider themselves “evangelical Christians” and that up to 80% of these are some version of Zionist—meaning broadly that they support Jews and Israel for Biblical reasons—then this poses a potentially large issue, especially in the southern states.  But this is a regional issue, one requiring regional solutions.  Secessionists will have to play up the benefits of religion, freedom, and independence, and argue that this outweighs any sanctions against local Jews.

All these issues come to a head in a larger concern:  the problem of size.  It has long been recognized, since ancient times, that overly-large states are in for trouble.  Biologically-speaking, this makes sense.  Humans evolved over 2 million years in small hunter-gatherer bands of perhaps 50 to 100 people; for millennia, this was the size of our ‘state.’  Our emotional and rational psyches evolved to deal with groups of this size, and no more.  Larger groups are both unnatural and unhealthy; in larger societies, systemic corruption inevitably creeps in.

The ancient Greeks understood this intrinsically.  Plato said that the maximum, ideal society would consist of 5,040 households, or around 25,000 people—for the entire city-state.[4]  Hippodamus argued for an even smaller state of 10,000 citizens.[5]  Aristotle broadly concurred, saying that the ideal state must be “one and self-sufficing.”  In Book 7 of Politics, he elaborates:

[A] great polis is not to be confounded with a populous one.  Moreover, experience shows that a very populous state can rarely, if ever, be well-governed; since all states that have a reputation for good government have a limit of population. …  To the size of states there is a limit, as there is to other things, plants, animals, implements.  For none of these retain their natural power when they are too large or too small, but they either wholly lose their nature, or are spoiled. …  In like manner, a state when composed of too few is not, as a state ought to be, self-sufficing; when of too many, though self-sufficing in all mere necessaries, as a nation may be, it is not a state, being almost incapable of constitutional government.  For who can be the general of such a vast multitude, or who the herald, unless he has the booming voice of a Stentor? 

               A state, then, only begins to exist when it has attained a population sufficient for a good life in the political community: it may indeed, if it somewhat exceeds this number, be a greater state.  But, as I was saying, there must be a limit.  What should be the limit will be easily ascertained by experience.  For both governors and governed have duties to perform; the special functions of a governor to command and to judge.  But if the citizens of a state are to judge and to distribute offices according to merit, then they must know each other’s characters; where they do not possess this knowledge, both the election to offices and the decision of lawsuits will go wrong.  When the population is very large, they are manifestly settled at haphazard, which clearly ought not to be.  Besides, in an over-populous state, foreigners and aliens will readily acquire the rights of citizens, for who will find them out?  Clearly then the best limit of the population of a state is the largest number which suffices for the purposes of life, and can be taken in at a single view.  (Book 7.4; italics added)

Remarkable insight, and utterly appropriate for the present day.

More recently, social theorists like Leopold Kohr, Ivan Illich, and E. F. Schumacher have also persuasively argued for smaller states.  Kohr suggests that, under modern, technological conditions, the maximum size for a well-governed and rational state is perhaps 10 million people.[6]  Say what you will about the small European nations today, but if nothing else, they are, for the most part, rationally governed; generally speaking, they “work”.[7]  And their smallness and ethnic homogeneity play a large part in their success.

This all helps to explain, first, the insanity of trying to manage a present-day America of 330 million people.  Three hundred million Gandhis would be ungovernable, let alone the present American mish-mash.  Second, it suggests that Allen West’s “new America” of perhaps 150 million is likewise far too big.  Texas alone is 30 million people; it really ought to become its own nation-state.  Florida, Ohio, and North Carolina, all over 10 million, could easily be their own nation-states.  The smaller US states might fruitfully band together.  Ultimately, the 24 “Trump states” could form five or ten independent nations, which might then organize a local American confederation of some sort, to advance their collective interests—but without surrendering local sovereignty.  Five or ten small, independent, pro-White nations would further allow for a fair amount of social and political experimentation, yielding successes that could be transferred to the others.  And diverse states would be harder to undermine by any potentially-resurgent Jewish Lobby—just as a unified European Union is much easier to corrupt than 27 independent nations.

So This Means War!

“Yes,” says the critic, “all fine and good.  But the mighty US military will come in and crush any budding secession movement.  You haven’t a prayer against them.”  Yes and no.  A single movement by a single state might be squelched, but simultaneous movements across the nation would be much harder to address.  We have to understand that our federal government is actually much weaker than it appears, at least when it comes to internal disruption.  We can bomb the hell out of Afghanistan, but a “CHAZ” microstate in downtown Portland carries on for months, run by nothing more than a handful of degenerate anarchists.  Black Lives Matter lunatics managed weeks of looting and burning because they were a diversified, incorrigible, lawless band, working in several locations simultaneously.  “Oh, but BLM and CHAZ had the implicit support of the Democratic power elite.”  Fine—but a multi-state secession effort would have the implicit support of many in the Republican power elite.  For them, there is much to be gained.  Lots of new states mean lots of new presidents, new governments, and new institutions (imagine: new universities not dominated by a Jewish intellectual class!).  Plenty of new opportunities for business, charities, religious groups, academia—the possibilities are immense.

Still, we have to be honest.  It could come down to war, at least in some form, and many in the military would doubtless support the secession.  We need not worry about cruise missiles raining down on Dallas or Columbus, or tanks rolling through the Indiana plains, but we can imagine federal troops being compelled to take some sort of action.  Well, then—defend yourself.  Thus it has always been.  As I’ve argued in the past, if a few thousand low-IQ Afghans can hold the US military at bay for 20 years, then a few million motivated Whites can do much more.  After all, those unwilling to fight are those undeserving to win anything.  We would do well to recall what Nietzsche said about liberalism and the struggle for freedom; I quote him at length:

My conception of freedom.  The value of a thing sometimes does not lie in that which one attains by it, but in what one pays for it—what it costs us.  I shall give an example.  Liberal institutions cease to be liberal as soon as they are attained: later on, there are no worse and no more thorough injurers of freedom than liberal institutions.  Their effects are known well enough: they undermine the will to power; they level mountain and valley, and call that morality; they make men small, cowardly, and hedonistic—every time it is the herd animal that triumphs with them.  Liberalism: in other words, herd-animalization. …

               For what is freedom?  That one has the will to assume responsibility for oneself.  That one maintains the distance which separates us.  That one becomes more indifferent to difficulties, hardships, privation, even to life itself.  That one is prepared to sacrifice human beings for one’s cause, not excluding oneself.  Freedom means that the manly instincts that delight in war and victory dominate over other instincts, for example, over those of “pleasure.”  The human being who has become free—and how much more the spirit who has become free—spits on the contemptible type of well-being, that dreamt of by shopkeepers, Christians, cows, Englishmen, and other democrats.  The free man is a warrior.

How is freedom measured in individuals and peoples?  According to the resistance which must be overcome, according to the exertion required, to remain on top.  The highest type of free men should be sought where the highest resistance is constantly overcome: five steps from tyranny, close to the threshold of the danger of servitude.  This is true psychologically if, by “tyrants,” are meant inexorable and fearful instincts that provoke the maximum of authority and discipline against themselves; the most beautiful type: Julius Caesar.  This is true politically too; one need only go through history.  The peoples who had some value, attained some value, never attained it under liberal institutions: it was great danger that made something of them that merits respect.  Danger alone acquaints us with our own resources, our virtues, our armor and weapons, our spirit, and forces us to be strong.  First principle: one must need to be strong—otherwise one will never become strong.

Those large hothouses for the strong—for the strongest kind of human being that has so far been known, the aristocratic commonwealths of the type of Rome or Venice—understood freedom exactly in the sense in which I understand it: as something one has or does not have, something one wants, something one conquers.[8]

Do we really want to be free?  Do we want to be strong?  Do we have the courage to be strong?  I believe we do.  I believe that White Americans—at least, some core segment of this group—will find it in themselves to take the reins, to fight, and consequently “to force the will of millennia upon new tracks” (to quote Nietzsche once again).  Now is the time to act.  We need to hit them where it hurts.  And I can promise you, the American Judeocracy fears nothing more than a widespread, pro-White secession movement; it is their greatest nightmare.  Let’s work to make it come true.

Thomas Dalton, PhD, has authored or edited several books and articles on politics, history, and religion, with a special focus on National Socialism in Germany.  His works include a new translation series of Mein Kampf, and the books Eternal Strangers (2020), The Jewish Hand in the World Wars (2019), and Debating the Holocaust (4th ed, 2020).  For all his works, see his personal website

[1] As I wrote recently:  “Let me make this as clear as possible:  Jews are not White—not in any relevant sense.  Jews are White like Jessica Krug and Rachel Dolezal are Black; that is, only to the extent that it serves their interests to deceive.  Yes, Jews’ skin tone matches ours, but that is merely an unfortunate and superficial fact of biology.  To further obscure the issue, they use plastic surgery to hide the nose and to minimize the uniquely repulsive effects of Jewish aging.  This allows them to circulate in White society unnoticed.  But they are not White.  Neither are Lebanese, Syrians, Iranians, nor any other light-skinned Arabs or Middle Easterners.  ‘White’ refers only to the indigenous people of Europe, Ukraine, and Western Russia.  Jews are not White.”

[2] The current officeholder is the Jew Steven Mnuchin.  For a brief further discussion, see my book Jewish Hand in the World Wars (2019: 140-142).

[3] See “The Great Emancipator and the Issue of Race” (here).  Also, CNN recently reported that the nation of Ghana issued a call to Black Americans to “come home” to Africa—a great idea for all concerned.

[4] See Laws, Book 5 (737c-744e).

[5] As mentioned by Aristotle, in Politics II.8 (1267b).

[6] See his fascinating book The Breakdown of Nations (1957/2012).

[7] Yes, we all know that Greece is a basket case.  There are always exceptions.  But most small European nations provide exceptionally high qualities of life, and in this sense, they work for their people.

[8] Twilight of the Idols, chap. 11, sec. 38.

47 replies
  1. Manuel Sotil
    Manuel Sotil says:

    All the juice will be squeezed out, gently or roughly. The “Christian Zionists” (whatever that means) will have to understand one simple basic tenet (sine qua non) of the religion the claim to profess:

    John 14:6
    NIV Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”
    NLT Jesus told him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me.”
    ESV Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”
    KJV Jesus saith unto him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.”

    The juice not only killed Him, but are on a very different road that leads somewhere better known to them. When the “Christian Zionists” finally understand that, they will stop drinking the poison handed to them by juice and their dirty little helpers, such as Hagee.

    • Gerry
      Gerry says:

      @ Manuel Sotil

      Great comment love, love it and to add I have always found it odd how they constantly harp about Jerusalem this and Jerusalem that? I mean sure its the eternal city or certainly will be but ultimately it was and is a city forsaken by God. Did not Christ make that abundantly clear:

      O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones God’s messengers! How often I have wanted to gather your children together as a hen protects her chicks beneath her wings, but you wouldn’t let me. And now, look, your house is abandoned and desolate. For I tell you this, you will never see me again until you say, ‘Blessings on the one who comes in the name of the Lord!’

      and when will these people do the last sentence of the paragraph?

      When their false messiah arrives and then betrays them thus opening their eyes. Zechariah 12:10 then tells us what will happen to a remnant of the people.

      “Then I will pour out a spirit of grace and prayer on the family of David and on the people of Jerusalem. They will look on me whom they have pierced and mourn for him as for an only son. They will grieve bitterly for him as for a firstborn son who has died. 11 The sorrow and mourning in Jerusalem on that day will be like the great mourning for Hadad-rimmon in the valley of Megiddo.

      12 “All Israel will mourn

      Further astonishing is it not how the Christian Zionists will harp to no end about:

      Pray for the peace of Jerusalem: they shall prosper that love thee. Psalm 122:6

      If you love her fine pray for her but even God must be in total disbelief at the astonishing ignorance and errors of their ways! Can you imagine St. Paul learning or hearing about the Church giving some 60 million plus dollars to the enemies of Christ as one Christian Zionist has done? He would rip out what was left of any hairs on his balding head and chase out of the Church such people.

      My how they love the words “they shall prosper that love you” but I bet they haven’t spent so much as a full day in prayer for the peace of the city of Jerusalem! Not so much as an hour even crying for her salvation.
      To busy filling their bank accounts and teaching nonsense like the blood moons. lol

      And for us few Christians who try to get the real truth out mocked and shunned. It’s dfifficult for me to see all the bulldung and lies and errors, hard indeed.

  2. RonaldB
    RonaldB says:

    This article is so dripping with hate towards Jews that it obscures its own good points.

    You’re proposing a kind of gerrymandering of territory so as to exclude Jews, blacks, Hispanics, Middle-Easterners, etc. Presumably, these peoples will be forbidden to enter the territory at all. This puts you at a great disadvantage. Just off the top of my head, the second most important person of the Confederacy, Secretary of State, spymaster, and right-hand man to Jefferson Davis was Judah Benjamin, Jewish. After the South lost the Civil War, Benjamin permanently exiled himself from the United States to protect the secrets of Confederate sympathizers in the North.

    I suggest employing a separation of political power from individual rights. I see nothing wrong in limiting the franchise and the right to hold political office, while retaining the full rights of every individual to have his safety and property protected. Jews, like Hispanics, blacks, high-income Indians, East Asians, and South Asians, tend to vote overwhelmingly liberal. Your best bet is to limit the franchise to people or groups likely to support a European, individual-rights-based government. But, of course, Scandinavians, particularly people from Sweden, are very likely to vote for socialist, globalist governments. So, the simple classification of white versus non-white is somewhat problematic.

    There is nothing new in the proposal to send blacks to Africa. The idea was being advocated well before the Civil War. The big problem was that everyone realized that the American blacks shipped off to Africa would soon die. A better solution was that employed by South Africa under apartheid, where blacks enjoyed massive services organized by whites, but operated under political conditions denying blacks political power. Lots of South Africans say the apartheid government fell not because it was deposed, but because it voluntarily gave up power. In other words, it lost the war of ideas and political philosophy.

    • Tim
      Tim says:

      Oh great, the Confederate Jew again. Without that guy mucking things up the South would have won. Won’t make that mistake again. With Jews you lose.

    • sandram
      sandram says:

      Remember the bolsheviks murdered over 60 million Christians. Remember who the Bolsheviks were and are. Then allow the writer his resentments. You need to catch up on what are really the Protocols (intentions) of the Zionists towards whites.

  3. Patrick Pappano
    Patrick Pappano says:

    The blowback from secession will undoubtedly be money. Money flooding into the public employees to recruit them for the counter-insurgency. Just to be clear how this will play out on the ground. And remember, the incentive for public employment is money over spirit. Where spirit prevails, actors opt for private employment that rewards individual initiative. Also remember, during the “Whiskey Rebellion,” 800 western Pennsylvania farmers lay down their rifles when confronted with George Washington leading an army of 13,000. This was perhaps the turning point from American manhood to serfdom. Secessionists must stand their ground regardless of the odds. Had those 800 farmers stood their ground, American history might very well have taken a different turn, even with all 800 dead. Not probable, but the only possibility to put down the oppressor is by shedding blood and lots of it.

  4. Karen
    Karen says:

    The “all men are created equal” clause of the Declaration was directed toward King George, not the population in general. This phrase has been misused and misrepresented by our enemies.

      • Karen
        Karen says:

        “As Washington’s soldiers stood ready for the brigadiers and colonels of their regiments to read the Declaration of Independence, they first heard words written by their commander. Washington explained that Congress had “dissolved the connection” between “this country” and Great Britain and declared the “United Colonies of North America” to be “free and independent states.”2

        Next came Jefferson’s stirring words explaining “…that all men were created equal and endowed by their Creator with the inalienable Rights of Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness…” Since King George III had trampled on these rights, as Jefferson argued in a long list of complaints against him, the people of the United States of America had the right to break the political bands that tied them to Great Britain and form a new government where the people would rule themselves. The words were so moving that citizens who had heard the declaration raced down Broadway toward a large statue of King George III. They toppled and decapitated it, later melting down the body for bullets that would be much needed in the coming battles to defend New York and the new nation that lay beyond it.”

        Mary Stockwell, Ph.D.

  5. George F. Held
    George F. Held says:

    Our nation may well split up, but that will be a product of violence, not of any reasonable plan. In the violence, as the late not-so-great Charles Manson once supposedly said, you skin will be your uniform. A map (a provisional one) of our new nation would look like what . . .?

  6. joe 6 pack
    joe 6 pack says:

    I think more and more Jews will board the plane that is called the ‘Flight from White'(Sailer). Jews are ‘White’ if it advantages their argument and they are nonwhite(like now) if it disadvantages their argument.
    Now they are becoming ‘proud Jews’ and no longer White. Considering they vote 70% Dem at the least and usually 80% Dem they certainly are not White voters. People in Mississippi are ‘White’ voters considering the White people there routinely vote 80% GOP. However in national elections Whites usually split their vote, usually leaning more GOP.
    So the question is, are the White people who vote Democratic really White? Are the 40% of White men who voted for Biden/Harris really white?

    • Slovenec
      Slovenec says:

      Are the 12% of blacks that voted for Trump black?
      I don’t believe that race is of such great importance, race seems more of a pigsty concept to me.

      For instance, (historical) Slovenians and Germans are supposed to be of the same race, but the former belonged to an inferior culture and they enslaved the Slovenians by fire and sword of Christianity they were spreading. In Nietzsche’s words, full of admiration for barbarity:

      “… as something one has or does not have, something one wants, something one conquers.”

      So we are dealing with bandits, looters, Germans, Christians, Moors, and other conquerors.

  7. pterodactyl
    pterodactyl says:

    “would deny citizenship to all non-Whites: all Blacks, all Hispanics, all Asians, and all Jews.”
    This is not as problematic as it might first appear for all the peoples in this list apart from the Jews, who like to cause mischief in other countries as an end in itself.
    Regarding the rest, if you ask them a few questions about ‘their homeland’ you will soon find that their first loyalty is to Iraq or Africa and they really love their homelands, as they readily describe them (Jews do also, but they do not want to return). In fact, they only came to the US for the money (once again the Jews are different as they have political aims and power aims, not just financial ones), so money can be used to induce them to return to ‘their homelands’ in the same way, except that in reverse they will be ‘going with the flow’, ie doing that which gives them more inner harmony for themselves. Paying the bribe to induce them to leave will be worth the huge cost for a few decades whilst the ‘grants’ or whatever are paid. But think how much more efficient the new white state could be without the huge burden of crime and corruption that the 3rd world and the Jews bring with them. If the Jews cause trouble, use the legal system against them just as they now use it against whites using ‘racism’, and fine them.

    • sandram
      sandram says:

      Protocols of Elders of Zion. Must read it. The jews are not here for money, they intend to get rid of the white race globally. To them we are their beasts of burden. They ain’t going anywhere. They live to destroy others………………….its history. How many countries kicked them out?

      • pterodactyl
        pterodactyl says:

        Sandram – see the article bellow in which Andrew Joyce and Kevin MacDonald (in the comments) both dismiss the Protocols, and say that they can be used to discredit those who criticise the Jews as conspiracy theorists.
        I would go even further and suggest that the Jews are not working to any kind of thought-out strategy and are just acting as they are because it is in their genetic nature. When the Jews on Breitbart tell each other how hard done by they are in history, in my view this is them trying to justify their inner hostility by seeking out explanations to justify their inner hostile urges, whereas the reality is that they have no reason for their hostility, as white nations are extremely generous to them (never reciprocated) , or rather, the Jews have no more reason to be resentful than every other race on earth has experienced at some stage, and much less reason than many. And that includes how the Germans were treated after WWII ended, by the Russians and by the Allies (book: ‘Other Losses’).

        Surely if the Jews did have a plan, in my view it would NOT involve (a) helping to bring down the nation that offers them friendship and military protection for Israel, (b) Assisting China to become more dominant when the Chinese have no interest in bowing to the Jews (c) Antagonising white nations continuously to such an extent that a purge of Jews is made MORE likely.

        The Never-ending Story
        December 15, 2020/51 Comments/in Featured Articles /by Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.

  8. Andrea Ostrov Letania
    Andrea Ostrov Letania says:

    A dream scenario would be as follows. It will never be realized, but it would solve a lot of problems.

    Just like Roman Empire had Eastern Empire and Western Empire(and just like there were two popes at one time), US would do better as two nation. Now, the US doesn’t have to split geographically or physically like the Roman Empire. It could remain intact. But half the people would belong to America 1 and the other half to America 2. The fact of dual-citizenship is proof that a person doesn’t need to LIVE in a certain nation to take part in it. A Mexican-American can also be a Mexican citizen and vote in Mexican elections.

    Then, even as US remains as it is geographically, someone can belong to US 1 or US 2. US 1 would have its own capital, and US 2 would have its own capital. This would be a good idea. Is it viable for Republicans to work in DC, a city that is 96% Democratic? Even if we’re told that bureaucrats and functionaries are apolitical, we know it’s not true. And Trump’s presidency proved it. He was surrounded by a hostile bureaucracy who undercut whatever he tried to do.

    How much better if globalists/imperialists had all of D.C. and if nationalists/patriots had their own capital run by their own kind. There would no longer be national elections but elections for US 1 and elections for US 2. US 1 would decide its preferred ‘liberal’ leader, and US 2 will decide its own ‘conservative’ leader. People who claim US 1 citizenship would pay taxes to their government, and people who claim US 2 citizenship would pay taxes to their government.
    Now, some operations and services will be dual-rule. Like management of National Parks as such are in the interests of both US 1 and US 2. And fire departments. Maybe libraries.

    But schools will be operated separately. US 1 will decide its own curriculum… such as ‘critical race theory’ and ‘blame whitey’. US 2 could opt for a saner and more patriotic curriculum.
    US 1 can recognize ‘gay marriage’ and force people to call a man a ‘they’ or believe he is a ‘woman’. US 2 doesn’t have to push gender nuttery.

    Also, if immigrants arrive and join US 1, they won’t be able to vote for candidates and policies of US 2.

    Also, on some matters, people will be judged based on their citizenship in US 1 or US 2. So, if US 1 decides to criminalize ‘hate speech’, those of US 1 can be prosecuted but those of US 2 cannot be IF US 2 is committed to free speech. And if US 1 bans firearms, those of US 1 can be prosecuted for owning a firearm but those of US 2 cannot be.

    As for the military, it should be dual-rule when it comes to defense of US territory. So, if US itself is attacked, both US 1 military and US 2 military must unite in the fight. But if it’s overseas ventures, the policies shall diverge. So, if US 1 military wants to occupy Syria but US 2 military doesn’t, only US 1 military is engaged.

    US 1 will have the richest and most talented people but also most of the worst people. It will be 85% of current Jews, 93% of blacks, 70% of browns, and 70% of yellows. It will be 40% of whites.

    US 2ill be 7% of blacks, 30% of browns, 30% of yellows, and 60% of whites. Less extreme at the tails but more solid at the center.

    Under this scenario, two people can be neighbors but belong to different nations. They might get along better. Indeed, why do religious people get along better? Catholics have their own thing and Protestants have their own thing. So, a Catholic and Protestant can live side by side but totally tolerate and respect one another. The Catholic doesn’t have to worry about Protestant imposing his values on him OR vice versa every 4 yrs. Likewise, ‘libs’ and ‘cons’ will get along better if they belong to their own version of the US. They pay taxes to different capitals for different priorities.

    An impossible dream but it would be nicer. Imagine if in 2016, US 1 got Hillary and US 2 got Trump. It would have been so much nicer. And Trump would have done better in the capital of US 2 that is dominated by ‘cons’. But in DC, he was surrounded by hostile population and subversive deep state.

    Even though US 1 and US 2 would be more a matter of state-of-mind and administration than physical separation, there can be special places designated for one group or another.

    So, every county can have a park or place only for people of US 1 and park or place for people of US 2. This would solve the monument controversy. If people of US 1 don’t want a certain ‘racist’ monument, it can be moved to a special place that belongs to US 2. So, don’t knock down General Lee statue. Move it to a place designated for US 2.

    Now, if people of US 1 want to ‘move’ to US 2, they can apply. And vice versa. But they have to meet certain criteria to be approved.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      No matter how you slice it and dice it ,
      if enough of the right people fail to lead the way
      to the creation and development of
      the sciences , the technologies , and
      ALL other endeavors needed in order for
      MANKIND to thrive-n-survive beyond
      the one and only immediately next specified and guaranteed
      Extinction Event
      which is currently now at this time
      {{ The Solar Extinction Event }}

      Therefore ,
      no matter what Whites do or any other race does , and
      no matter how they do it
      if they are not oriented toward fulfilling
      {{{ The PRIME DIRECTIVE }}}
      and refuse to acknowledge
      the very real eternal potentiality for an unlimited future
      for MANKIND to ultimately thrive-n-survive beyond any
      Extinction Event
      at any future time and anywhere in the universe
      anything and everything anyone does is ultimately futile .

      Please note :
      Although many thorny issues about it could be raised , generally
      morality as it pertains to human behavior
      is irrelevant and has NO significance apart from
      whether the behavior is for , neutral , or against
      the fulfillment of
      {{{ The PRIME DIRECTIVE }}}
      and likewise for
      governmental , political , religious , et al matters .

      Also note :
      Although many thorny issues about it could be raised , generally
      human procreation/reproduction can be
      a positive / neutral / negative factor-of-fulfillment
      and likewise for non-reproduction .

  9. Barbara
    Barbara says:

    We can also use the Great Reset to our advantage because it is Jews and liberals who support it and Christians and conservatives, mostly white people, who will oppose it, especially when people begin to find out what it is about. Already Catholic priests have videos on youtube opposing it and calling on Christians to oppose it.

  10. Tim Folke
    Tim Folke says:

    Thank you Dr. Dalton for an article that has the rare combination of being both realistic and encouraging.

    For many years I have been a proponent of secession, but I have always felt it had to be within a strictly contiguous geographic framework. However, I am starting to realize that perhaps a balkanized confederacy linked by spirit rather than soil may be better. One thing is certain – if decent folk form such a confederacy with fanatic zeal, the remainder of the country will most likely self-destruct. Witness Portland, Seattle, Chicago, NYC – hey, with enemies like that, who needs friends?

    In regards to Christian Zionists, there is good evidence the Ashkenazim (about 85% of world Jewry) are not even s Semitic people, let alone of Israelite descent. Such information could red pill many Christian Zionists as no one likes being lied to.

  11. John
    John says:

    I had not known that Merrick Garland was Jewish.

    Had the Republican Senate allowed Merrick Garland to be appointed to the Supreme Court in 2016 when the Democrats nominated him, there would have been 4 Jews on SCOTUS:


    Do Amercan Jews have no shame wielding such power? Apparently not.
    How much power do you people want?
    When is enough enough, especially when 90% of you are liberals?
    And no, Neo-cons are not conservative.

  12. John
    John says:

    As a display of power and to increase morale, I would like to suggest nationwide strikes by patriotic Americans soon after Joe Biden takes office.

    The Left showed its strength and committment with riots and more this past summer, aided by Democrats of course.

    Patriotic Americans on the Right must also show their strength and committment.

    Leaders are needed.

    Trump could start it, but I am not sure he has the wisdom to continue to lead it.

  13. Alexander Hamilton
    Alexander Hamilton says:

    Article III Clause 3
    Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      A dose of factuality is always welcome. Thank you.

      The Framers knew full well, of course, the uses that thoughtcrime had for centuries been put to by the Crown, even before the Cecils and Walsingham raised it to a level of sophisticated deceit admired even by the Mossad. Thus, the Philadelphia convention’s decision that treason be legally defined to consist in actions, not words, is an admirable facet of the Constitution. It’s unfortunate but hardly culpable that the Framers couldn’t foresee the cybertreason of Jews and their epigones.

  14. Heimdall in Africa
    Heimdall in Africa says:

    Thomas : thanks so much for such a great article. Not only did I find it compelling, but, like a true Faustian European, I learned a lot too.

    This is what I value about TOO (and Counter-currents ) : that I actually learn something : here it’s something of Nietzsche and Aristotle &Plato.

    The Jews really do seem to be coming into the light now, whereas prior to this, very much in the shadows – at least in my perception. Just becoming so much more blatant… (and having evidently – like never before seen – non-white, non European behaviour and thought-patterns inimical to us)

  15. Couldn’t B. Righter
    Couldn’t B. Righter says:

    The US military has been unable to destroy low-IQ Taliban because the oligarchs feel sorry for them, poor, brown, Muslim, pedophiles—i.e., the Democratic base, just in another country. Such pity, even love and respect, the oligarchs show towards the Taliban (even though fighting them at some level must be done to accomplish the oligarchs’ overriding political goals having to do with drugs and oil), would never be shown by the oligarchs towards break-away white (or even simply freedom-loving) states. The same people who could never conceive of nuking Kandahar would nuke Dallas in a New York minute if they thought doing so would end the independence movement. Lincoln, for all his murderous rampage, was a saint compared to the oligarchs and their minions in the CIA, FBI, and DoJ, who are just waiting to implement a real Holocaust against white Americans given half a chance.

    • Junghans
      Junghans says:

      You are essentially correct, at this time the (((system))) doesn’t hesitate to openly and violently suppress any promising form of White advocacy, let alone secession. Reflect on Charlottsvile and its aftermath.
      To quote Eric Striker, “America and its satellites are a life support system for 18 million Jews worldwide”. They’re not going to give up their source of power and livelihood without causing more mayhem than they already have to date. The ‘battle royale’ is yet to come, as the historical process plays out.
      To add a bit of humor to the current situation, as one wag put it, “If you want to really know who rules over you, get Mel Gibson drunk and ask him!”.

  16. tadzio
    tadzio says:

    The right of succession is built into the Constitution. This done by omission. The Constitution is the successor to the Articles Of Confederation. It is a revision of the previous contract.

    The statement of purpose of the Articles: “Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union between the states of New Hampshire, …” The purpose of the Constitution: “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

    Note what is left out of the latter document: “perpetual Union”. This was not accidental. Both sets of words were carefully thought out. They were written by serious learned men.

    The omission means that the Founders Fathers understood and provided for that in the fullness of time the constituent sovereign entities, that is, states, would opt to go their separate ways. That time has come.

  17. Sursumcorda
    Sursumcorda says:

    Until White people here in the US and frankly throughout the world can honestly say “we don’t have a liberal problem, we have a Jewish problem”, this madness will continue.

  18. Anthony Kimball
    Anthony Kimball says:

    At this moment in history, any talk of white americans seceding from the country and forming their own nation is utter foolishness. We possess neither the required ethnic solidarity nor the military capability necessary to enact, let alone maintain, any kind of successful partition. The first thing any peoples need to carry out any kind of large, nationwide-scale project of this kind is A PEOPLE ACTUALLY CAPABLE of doing so. Hate to break it to you fellow white nationalists, but the state of our folk in AD 2020 renders them abysmally unqualified to tackle anything even approaching secession. Our racial quality has sunk to a negative numbers level. What’s the solution? The solution, the only feasible, workable way out of the mess our great-great etcetera grandparents got us into by surrendering this nation to our racial enemies, is to quietly retreat and withdraw from the larger society to the best of our ability, get the hell off all forms of social media, and begin getting the ball rolling by finding and having as many children with compatible racial counterparts. Simply stated, our people have to bring our collective racial level back to where it was circa 1900. We have to regain our racial strength, which has been inarguably diluted and sapped (on purpose by you know who) over the course of the last century. This will not happen overnight. There is no quick fix to our predicament. We will see no white renaissance in our lifetimes, but if we do this right, if we begin the slow process of recreating our genetic stock, we can leave the world knowing we made a contribution to our people’s eventual return to greatness. We must ensure that our children are educated and indoctrinated to the hilt on racial matters, so that THEY will be motivated to do the same with THEIR children, and so on and so on until, hopefully, in a couple of centuries there will FINALLY be a generation of white people ready and actually ABLE to form a nation of their own. That is the generation that will be able to DO the things that this generation can only fantasize about. No, my fellow whites, this is no longer your country and you will not see it revived in your lifetimes, but IF you finally understand and accept these unpleasant truths, and IF you adopt the long view of history, there IS a way towards the light. You can depart this world knowing that your descendants, which by then shall constitute a vast army of educated, indoctrinated fighters hungry for vengeance, will ultimately and completely rid this physical space of all our enemies. Your posterity, if you proceed in the correct manner, will retake this corrupt and befouled earth and remake it anew. Beauty, righteousness and truth will once again reign supreme and will NEVER AGAIN be deposed.

    • Daniel Mint
      Daniel Mint says:

      Your argument is that whites are genetically weak and that this would change if they married another white person and had kids.

      One might argue that the TOTAL FRAUD culture of the west aimed at mixing whites with race mixed people and pushing weakness had a negative genetic impact.

      Now with the covid thing it turns out 1/6 part of whites has gene common also in India that makes em more weak and affected by the covid 19 virus. Maybe these people in Europe and the states are part gypsy or tattare (another East Indian group that lost a war and migrated that are from different casts, gypsies are from the lowest cast in India and were thrown out).

      Which would make 17 % of white looking folks part gypsy. And then we have the whites mixed with spam, mongols, and africans and arabs. Is even 70 % of whites 100 % white?

      Regardless I don’t think it’s our genetic material that is weak I think its propaganda and a total FRAUD CULTURE especially in the mainstream but it goes down to the underground stuff also…

      It’s also a way of survival, I mean going ALL OUT TOTAL racist might not be a god move if you wanna keep your job or something… So you expect people to start to death because they are racist?

      Regardless I think people are ready to move with a new fresh ideology and good political platform I think white interests can be advanced and very fast also, large changes possible within 4 or 5 years.

      But we’ll see what happens. GET READY!

      • Daniel Mint
        Daniel Mint says:

        That should be starve to death, there is some kinda automatic spell check replacement thing on my smartphone I forgot to turn off.

        And MERRY CHRISTMAS everyone!

      • moneytalks
        moneytalks says:

        ” Regardless I don’t think it’s our genetic material that is weak I think its propaganda and a total FRAUD CULTURE “…

        Exactly . Anti-White propaganda and a chosenhite jewmasterr-corrupted White Christian culture are major factors in the currently mostly soft genocide of Whites .

        Whites have the highest average IQ of the major races which is the single most distinguished characteristic of humanity with regard to all other worldly creatures . High IQ is the starting point for the development of high standards of living . “The jews” may have a higher average IQ than Whites but Jews are not a major race in terms of population size .

        Unfortunately , the vast majority of Westernworld Whites are Christian where their religion cannot “save” Whites since Christianity inadvertently cultivates weaknesses resulting from an egregious lack of political/social/religious intelligence and consequently a lack of appropriate racial intelligence ( not mostly an IQ issue ) .

        Whites have been gradually increasingly enslaved over more than a hundred year span until now where they are near or past the point-of-no-return from an ignominious enslavement , as a result of their lack of sufficient political astuteness , to their chosenhite jewmasterss . The high average IQ cannot by itself “save” Whites and it remains to be seen if they can acquire the much needed abundance of political intelligence to escape their imminent , virtual , and currently mostly soft extinction .

        Communications capabilities and organizational capabilities are both being legally and systematicly restricted worldwide to prevent an effective counteroffensive by Whites against total enslavement to the NWO/JWO/ZWO globalist ILLuminati elites .

        • Daniel Mint
          Daniel Mint says:

          You are correct that they are forbidding more and more things in many countries and also controlling information.

          Which is kinda weird they pretend we have democracy but forbid certain opinions and facts from being spread such as the truth that there are huge racial differences between different races and the like.

          Unless people can freely spread political ideas we don’t have democracy.

          Also I think racial differences go way beyond average differences in IQ which shurely proves these differences.

          But subsahariann africans sure some of them are good at music but they tend to be extremely corrupt murderers without any morals whatsoever that sell out for the smallest sum. Having arabs or subsaharians among white women and children is putting these white children at extreme risk of rape and mental torture.

          Just having them around sucks the will of life out of whites. They hate white children and will do anything to stop whites from finding another white partner (i.e. wife or husband depending on your sex). The hatred is just monumental and it’s not slavery it’s not imperialism it’s something else we can’t comprehend because their very nature is so different. Blacks hate everyone but themselves for the most part. What do you think they think about whites. Their hate is endless…

          So having them around is a disaster.

          But we still have room to act at least 4 to 5 years or so but we gotta be careful, hide our faces, work hard and we can win. But they sure increase the anti white faschism as much as they can get away with.

          We must fight surveillance. We must fight “hate” laws we must take back our destiny from these anti white hateful forces with their enormous hate for our kind.

          Also I think the jews are partially acting according to their religion which tells them that all jews should move back to Israel and just marry jews and rebuild the temple which for that to happen I think they are destroying the western world so that jews have to move there or something the like…

          Also that they are quite often mixed with arabs and subsahariann blacks could be part of it given the nature of subsahariann africans and arabs but then it kinda comes down to what is genetics and what is culture and what are other factors. I personally think humans are more complex…

  19. Bobby
    Bobby says:

    Thank you so much for a very well written and thoughtful piece Mr. Dalton.

    I was never an advocate of it, but with all that keeps happening in our country, I now believe that secession is a great idea. Why should the whole country suffer because of the insanity of the left which is mostly centered in the cities? If one looks at the election results on a colored map, Trump won everything; he even won most of the counties in the blue states. The only thing he lost were the cities.

    It also seems that secession is happening naturally. NY will loose over 400,000 residents by 1/1/21. It has lost over one million residents since 2010. I personally know two families who left NYC for Texas and a friend who left for Florida. I myself am also considering leaving NY soon. The families leave mostly for their children and to escape the insane taxes. The lockdown fraud is hurting children in horrible ways and of course the msm does not report this. I don’t know what the exact numbers are for California but so many people are leaving that it will soon change their representation in congress and their electoral college number.

    People on twitter who are from Florida, South Dakota, Texas, and other like states are now starting to refer to their state when tweeting; “this is what’s going on here in free zone Florida, free zone South Dakota etc…”

    I would bet that much of the country would join the secession. There is no doubt in my mind that Trump won New York. If you look at the map, it’s mostly all red. New York has still not finished counting all of the votes from the election and this has been swept under the rug. Let us all live under the constitution, pass a rule that it can never be changed and live free. Let the communist cities implode. Communism is a lie. It’s just another name for Jewish mafia, we all know that.

    The one thing that must happen in the new free, constitutional America; the Jewish problem must be allowed to be spoken of. It must be laid open on the table. Jewish hatred of White, European, Christian culture, values, history and this great country that our ancestors created must be acknowledged. If not, then the Jews of course will just destroy the new free, constitutional America. I have lived mostly in cities on the east coast my whole life, and have interacted and have gotten to observe not only every race on this earth but also Jews. I can tell you this without any doubt: all of the earths races mix well imho. Give people jobs, some chance of upward mobility, nice neighbors, decent comforts for their families and plenty of food, decent educations for their children, and people get along. But the Jews, they do not mix in. They are as Kevin so aptly titled in one of his books, “A people that shall dwell alone.”

    We’re right at the cusp. We all need to reach out more and gently, and start to talk about the Jewish problem, Jewish supremacy. Most Trump supporters, patriots on social media are always very forthcoming that they’re Christians. The dissident right needs to make what we talk about on sites such as TOO ‘user friendly.’ I’m working on that. Other’s need to also. Get it into the language when we can. ‘I don’t agree with the msm, I mean, I’m a Christian, the msm is 100% Jewish. ‘I love my Jewish friends but why do they hate our President so much? Just look at the fake news. The news media is dominated by Jews.’ ‘BLM is financed by George Soros and Susan Rosenberg, they’re Jewish. BLM does nothing to help the black people in the inner cities, just look at Chicago. Why do they keep tearing statues of some great Americans down? Why do they only talk about only the negative things of our history? Why do they hate white people so much? Why would Jewish people pay for this and the Jewish msm support this?’ ‘Our public education system is run by Jewish people. Do you see what they’re teaching our children!? Why? Have you seen this 1619 project?’ ‘Do you know that the founder and creator of Common Core, David Coleman is an orthodox New York Jew who never taught a day of school in his life! What is going on?’ Things like that. We have to start somewhere. There are over 80 million Trump supporters and it’s probably more, who are completely fed up with the state of the country and government and many talk about the issue and possibility of secession. They just need a little push that’s all. And I have a feeling from experience, that it might not be as hard as we think to give them the freedom to discuss what many already know.

  20. pterodactyl
    pterodactyl says:

    Footnote [1]: “Neither are Lebanese, Syrians, Iranians, nor any other light-skinned Arabs or Middle Easterners. ‘White’ ”
    Some from these races are indistinguishable from Westerners and very attractive in appearance, and very fair skinned. There must have been a significant injection of white genes from the slave trade. The high ranking arables would have harems and concubines drawn from the white slave girls, and they would pick the best women, the fairest. Their offspring would be half white, and if they too had white slave mistresses, their children would be three quarters white, and then if these families continued to marry each other, the high white gene component would be maintained.
    I am not saying they can be described as white, but there must have been a lot of white genes acquired via the slave trade.

  21. Coll Doll
    Coll Doll says:

    Thomas Dalton, in your proposal that the new white nation “would deny citizenship to all non-Whites: all Blacks, all Hispanics, all Asians, and all Jews” I’d like to hear where Native Americans fit into your picture.

  22. Coll Doll
    Coll Doll says:

    Thomas Dalton writes: “We have to understand that our federal government is actually much weaker than it appears, at least when it comes to internal disruption. We can bomb the hell out of Afghanistan, but a “CHAZ” microstate in downtown Portland carries on for months, run by nothing more than a handful of degenerate anarchists.”

    It has long been my understanding that the Military-Intelligence-Industrial Complex has no intentions of “winning” in Afghanistan. Long term occupation is the plan intended to ensure the flow of heroin, pipeline oil and be regional police man.

  23. Andrea Ostrov Letania
    Andrea Ostrov Letania says:

    To expand on earlier comment:

    Never let a crisis go to waste. Use the crisis of 2020 to split the US in two.

    US doesn’t need to split geographically. Just politico-denomi-Nationally. It’s like Protestants and Catholics live side by side but belong to different churches.

    Create two Americas with two capitols. Let cons belong to America 1 and let Libs belong to America 2.

    Cons should use 2020 as excuse for a massive tax revolt. Just like boomers burned draft cards in the 60s, the cons should say they want no more to do with the current US that cheats so spectacularly in elections. Besides, how can cons do anything in D.C., a town where 96% of people are Democrats? Imagine Democratic politicians operating in a capital that is 96% conservative.

    Let there be two Americas. One side pays taxes to America 1, the other side pays taxes to America 2. People of America 1 vote for their leaders, and people of America 2 vote for their leaders. That way, One America can have someone like Biden, the other America can have someone like Trump.

    Now, some things will be of shared use, like upkeep of national parks and access to natural resources. And utilities like water and electricity. But they would have separate schools. Let one America teach ‘white guilt’ while the other America teaches patriotism. Let one America worship homos, and let other America worship God and Jesus.

    Though seemingly impossible, it just might be possible given what happened in 2020, actually since 2016. Jews are so insistent on “What we want!!” that they pulled all the stops since Trump’s election to destroy every standard and rule of law. Not only Russia Hoax and bogus Ukraine impeachment but Big Tech censorship, denial of financial service to dissidents, Covid hysteria to destroy the Trump economy, BLM riots, and etc. Jews use Antifa to attack law-abiding Americans. And then the big fraudulent election, and media complicity.

    2020 has been such a crisis year, mainly due to Jewish supremacist obnoxiousness, that it is about time for patriots to finally call for a breakup. Letting Jewish Power get away with 2020 is like letting someone get away with rape. Weaklings will cower before Jews and plead in tone of appeasement, “Oh, you kicked our ass real good this year. From now, we will behave and no longer vote for someone like Trump again. So, will you pleeeeeeaaaaaase be good to us from now on and not beat us up? Oh, boo hoo hoo.” That’s cuck attitude.

    No, it’s time for a new kind of secession. Not geographic — impossible as every state has its share of libs and cons — but in taxation and political governance.
    Imagine a world where lib parents send their kids to lib school, and con parents send their kids to con school. And Libs have their president in someone like Biden and cons have their president in someone like Trump. Except for common use purposes, their tax dollars go to support different governments. And if libs want more electoral fraud, let them have it. Cons have cleaner elections to elect their own kind. Also, with most Jews being in Lib America, the conservative America can be relatively free of Jewish influence.

    It will make for a more peaceful nation as libs will always have their president, and cons will always have their president.

  24. Daniel Mint
    Daniel Mint says:

    What you are all missing is that the west is run by people that are race mixed often part gypsy, African, arab or the like.

    For them often everything is pushing their race mixed genetics by immigration.

    These race mixed hordes controlled at large secret societies, government, politics, economics, IT, media and so on…

    They are most often parasitic all they do is steal from true whites (that includes our supreme genetics). Because they are not inventive. They tend to be inferior and they know it.

    And then you have people who are part gypsy get kids with people who are a bit African and a bit arab than then have kids with someone part jewish and so on and you get pretty smart but often LYING MANIPULATIVE STEALING BASTARDS.

    They have been plundering our countries for innovation for hundreds of years. It’s all a fraud. The Beatles are thieves they didn’t write their songs for starters they were just pretty good musicians that probably were chosen because they look partly jewish partly gypsy and had a jewish drummer and to push anti white agendas (Hinduism, against christianity against racism, all be as one…, pop culture, youth culture…). These record companies just steal. Most artists you see are a fraud pushed because of their genetics and on an attempt to steal everything whitey do. And since the internet threatens their monopoly on information they at large take control of that…

    See they just push their racial makeup and they hate whites because we are better, superior some might say or many yeah you know…

    Heres the multicultural society for ya:

    1. African, subsahariann steal production ideas new music inventions and melodies from whites.

    2. Chinese, asians steal whites technology.

    3. Jews steal whites melodies when in music business and production ideas and give it to jews or half jews or people who look jewish or n-wordsers subsaharian in order to push racemixing.

    4. People who are part gypsy steal everything they can all the time, most of them. Technology, art of every kind…

    5. This is done through secret services (C.I.A. and FBI in the states, the similar things in Europe and so on), secret societies and just the part gypsies and race mixed bonding together I don’t know how.

    Part of the jews and others race mixed together with homosexuals and pedophiles replaced white culture with subsahariann African culture and has been working on that since forever and then they push the homosexual thing aggressively. That’s your mainstream culture. And for example in the 80’s there was still good mainstream movies coming from the states.

    This is just them plundering everything a white person does in any field whites do anything and with new surveillance technology it keeps getting more effective.

    The jews are just a middle hand driven by culture and according to some by the on average mixture that has taken place in the region (i.e. som argue that because many of them are part African they push that genetics and the like…).

    And it’s just part of the equation.

  25. Daniel Mint
    Daniel Mint says:

    And also may I remind you, your movement in the states aint that big is it. The average trump supporter may want a wall on the border and less immigration, but a potential civil war?

    Like is there any organization in the USA doing information in the streets is there a pro white newspaper being distributed, is there leaflets on any scale? Seems to me the “movement” is a bunch teens doing memes on social media and being spied on for doin it right into that trap hey.

    And sure you have militias and gun peoples but their leaders are often against “white supremacy”, and then the kkk and neo nazis. Maybe a few thousand people and a tail of quiet supporters or whatever.

    I mean in the 80s there was the order but they were like 10 people and all of them got prison for life and their achievement was maybe getting some money into organizations they supported (that did not get anything done with it really but maybe they can what do I know). But they probably would have been better off spreading information, it’s just that they could not even get that done I guess that was not their talent or something.

    So like all this thing with Trump supporters and the majority Trump states dividing from the USA it’s a fantasy. It’s also illogical, you gonna expelled all democrats and a lot of people that voted Trump may not even be “racist”, they might just be into low taxes or whatever, a lot of people voting democrat may be more “racist”/etno centric.

    What has been effective is holocaust denial, apparently among young Americans 25 % think the Holocaust is a fraud I heard. How many of the people who think that are white? And also I think the Holocaust did happen so that seems kinda pointless but it sure is a testament to radicalization.

    Which NO movement has been able to roll with. There is no movement. And unless it’s built and done by proper white people and done methodically and with hard work and people getting engaged then you know, you might just loose. Happened to many countries and things, Alexandria and so on. And if you etno centric think races exist and are very different then you know, is there a way back when that according to people who think the race issue angle is relevant, then it’s over, forever according to that way of seeing things (mainly based on personal experiences, IQ tests, tendencies and DNA science supposedly).

    So yeah, what you gonna do?

    I aint seen anything that looks like a good plan that the authors here didn’t pick up from somewhere else. The worst articles I read here were the ones outlining rules and laws and ideas for a constitution, in my opinion crazy lunatic stuff…. Like hardly any whites want that not even “racist” ones, it just stinks. Like fuckin eugenics, like whites became smarter in the last 100 years without that shit. When the nazis did that they gave extra money to the families of ss members i.e. their supporters that may hav been idiots and the allowed men to take several wives… So many authors here failed at building a momentum and they failed totally in my opinion in building a political platform that attracts whites. Many authors are also stuck in nazi mode i.e. thinking that is the best politics and that Hitler was great and things. Failing to grasp the drug usage of him and other issues such as maybe he was a pedophile and was a total psycho.

    Just because someone may or may not have some points and gain power does not make him a great leader it can be the opposite.

      • Daniel Mint
        Daniel Mint says:

        I looked at revisionism thing some time ago and I also read books that went into great details about what happened.

        I think it did indeed go down.

        But then again, can we be sure about anything in history? A huge amount of our culture is a fraud meant to take whites out.

        Regardless of that matter I am not a great fan of Hitler or the nazi ideology. Nazis seem to think that if they can just get people not to believe in the holocaust, then people will all wake up and vote for heir nazi party. They just think it’s the best ideology. I don’t and also most whites that think the holocaust is a fraud don’t vote nazi.

Comments are closed.