Zionists Lie As Naturally As They Breathe: Jewish Control, Zionist Subversion and the “Contradictions” of Anti-Semitism

Like all decent people, I stand unshakably with the powerless Jewish community against the vile scourge of anti-Semitism and anti-Jewish racism. And in order to better defend cowering Jews against their hugely powerful enemies, I’ve often asked myself: What is the most anti-Semitic nation on earth? Is it Iran, perhaps? Well, no. Not by a long way. The citizens of Iran have never loudly celebrated a disgusting anti-Semitic stereotype, nor has the prime minister of Iran been photographed with a smug grin as he too celebrates the stereotype.

Parasite’s grin: Bibi Netanyahu greets Jonathan Pollard, the Jewish spy who did huge harm to his “own nation” of America on behalf of Israel

But the citizens of Israel have done exactly that and the prime minister of Israel has been photographed exactly like that. According to the highly respected International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), the following is a prime example of anti-Semitism: “Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.” Towards the end of 2020, Donald Trump once again followed Jewish orders and released Jonathan Pollard, “the most damaging spy in United States history,” from parole after his long jail sentence and allowed him to fly to Israel. Pollard is Jewish and spied enthusiastically for Israel, doing huge harm to America as he handed priceless secrets to his Mossad handlers. But Pollard was born in America, therefore his “own nation” must be America and, as the IHRA have told us, it is clearly anti-Semitic to say he could be more loyal to Israel than to America.

Born in America, loyal only to Israel

But what did the citizens and prime minister of Israel do? They brazenly celebrated that vile anti-Semitic stereotype about Jewish disloyalty and treachery. The Irish Savant reported Pollard’s arrival in Israel like this:

It was a welcome befitting a war hero. And in a sense Jonathan Pollard was indeed such a hero, and a patriot. At considerable personal risk he stole secrets which in turn were traded by his country to great effect. He was greeted in Tel Aviv by none other than Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. As he disembarked, he kissed the ground and recited the traditional sheheheyanu blessing of thanksgiving. A beaming Beni gushed: “Blessed are you, lord our God, king of the universe, who has granted us life, sustained us, and enabled us to reach this occasion. I was thrilled to welcome Jonathan and Esther Pollard today upon their arrival in Israel and to give Jonathan an Israeli identity card. Now they are home. Welcome home, now you are a citizen of the State of Israel.” Pollard responded: “We are ecstatic to be home at last after 35 years and we thank the people and the Prime Minister of Israel for bringing us home.” (A Hero’s Homecoming, The Irish Savant, 5th January 2021)

But how can Israel be Pollard’s “home” if his own nation is his birthplace of America? The only logical conclusion to reach is this: Benjamin Netanyahu is one of the world’s worst anti-Semites, Israel is the most anti-Semitic nation on earth, and Jonathan Pollard is a self-hating Jew. At least, that’s the only logical conclusion if you trust the IHRA to be honest about “anti-Semitism” and Jewish behaviour.

No concern for truth or objective reality

But you can’t trust the IHRA, of course. Like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in America, the Community Security Trust (CST) in Britain and the Ligue Internationale Contre le Racisme et l’Antisémitisme (LICRA) in France, the IHRA is a typical Jewish organization in that it believes in the audacity of mendacity. Like the ADL et al, the IHRA has no concern for truth or objective reality. Instead, it relentlessly and ruthlessly pursues What’s Best for Jews. Free speech and open debate are not best for Jews, therefore the IHRA wants to silence all critics of Jewish power and subversion. That’s why it says ludicrous things, then demands that they be taken seriously. You’ve heard of the Emperor’s New Clothes. Now meet the Empire’s New Definition:

Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities. — Definition of anti-Semitism by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA)

The Empire is Zionism and that ludicrously vague definition is plainly designed to end free speech about Jewish political power and the way Jews control Western politics for the benefit of Israel. What can’t be discussed can’t be challenged or criticized, which is just the way organized Jewry want things to be. Unlike the Emperor’s New Clothes, which were exposed as a sham when a little boy literally “spoke truth to power,” the Empire’s New Definition is being taken seriously by supine politicians and bureaucrats all over the world. In Britain, the free-speech-hating Campaign Against Antisemitism has boasted of how widely the dud definition has been accepted:

In 2005, the EU Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC), now the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), adopted a “working definition of antisemitism” which has become the standard definition used around the world, including by the European Parliament, the UK College of Policing, the US Department of State, the US Senate, and the 31 countries comprising the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance. In 2016, the powerful House of Commons Home Affairs Committee joined Campaign Against Antisemitism’s longstanding call for the British government and its agencies, as well as all political parties, to formally adopt the International Definition of Antisemitism, following which the British government formally adopted the definition. (What is Antisemitism?, The Campaign Against Antisemitism)

In other words, thousands of legal and legislative experts have read the IHRA definition and responded not with incredulous laughter, but with cries of “We hear and obey!” For all sane and objective people, however, the definition exposes the organized Jewish community as implacable enemies not merely of free speech but of the very concepts of truth and objective reality. Even some members of the Jewish elite object to the IHRA definition. Professor David Feldman, director of the Pears Institute for the Study of Antisemitism at the University of London, has said that the “government should not impose [this] faulty definition of antisemitism on universities.” The prominent Jewish lawyers Sir Stephen Sedley and Sir Geoffrey Bindman were two of the signatories to a letter in the Guardian stating that the “legally entrenched right to free expression is being undermined by an internally incoherent ‘non-legally binding working definition’ of antisemitism.”

“A bewildering variety of world-views”

These dissenting Jews are certainly not friendly to Whites or Western civilization — Stephen Sedley, for example, wants open borders for Muslims and is a son of a “lifelong Communist” — but one has to give them credit for being honest about the definition and resisting very strong pressure from other Jews. The Jewish Chronicle reports that Professor Feldman has been “rebuked” by his colleagues at the Pears Institute. Sedley and Bindman will face similar hostility for being “outliers,” as the Jewish commentator Harry Goldstein describes all Jews who object to the ludicrous IHRA definition. Goldstein goes on to expose the “contradictions” of anti-Semitism like this:

Antisemitism differs from other racisms in that it understands itself as ‘punching up’. It constructs its target group as a sinister elite, which it sees itself as courageously defying. This is a deeply conspiratorial world-view. Antisemitism is not just racist stereotypes about Jews having long noses, an obsession with money or being generally slippery characters. These stereotypes are rather like the porcupine’s needles. They’re obvious, they hurt, but they are not the essence of the animal.

A key point about this faux anti-elitism is that it can attach itself to a bewildering variety of world-views. For each, it constructs Jews as whatever the adherents of the world-view despise. In Medieval times it was their religion, for 19th century racists it was their supposed race. For right-wingers Jews are communists, for the left (including Marx) they are the essence of the money power. For nationalists (and Stalin) they are rootless cosmopolitans, for liberals narrow nationalists. In 19th-century Britain they were swarthy Levantines and Orientals, while for the Nazis they were Semites, the sworn enemies of the white Aryan race. And now these swarthy Levantines have apparently been transformed into white colonialists. (Antisemitism at UCL — the Working Party Report, Harry Goldstein, 22nd December 2020)

There you have it: according to Harry Goldstein, anti-Semites deal in ludicrous contradictions. It’s the same as when some pseudo-scientists make the ludicrous and irrational claim that flies can also exist in a wingless, worm-like form known as a “larva” or “maggot.” Have you ever heard anything more ridiculous? But it gets worse: the same pseudo-scientists make the same contradictory claim about many other insects that are famed for their aerial abilities, from butterflies, dragonflies and damselflies to mayflies, fireflies and hoverflies. According to these idiots, all such blatantly winged insects can also exist as wingless “larvae.” And some of the “larvae” live underwater.

The contradictory life-cycle of dragonflies

Again, what nonsense! Thanks to simple, a-priori logic, we have no need to examine the real world for such mythical creatures as “larvae.” Dragonflies have wings and drown in water. They could not possibly exist as wingless larvae living underwater in ponds and lakes. But they do, of course. Harry Goldstein’s attack on the “contradictions” of anti-Semitism is both wrong and dishonest: “For right-wingers Jews are communists [in fact, Jews were very disproportionately involved in communism for much of the twentieth century], for the left (including Marx) they are the essence of the money power [Jews are indeed highly overrepresented in financial institutions, Wall St., hedge funds, and wealth generally]. For nationalists (and Stalin) they are rootless cosmopolitans [the organized Jewish community has championed globalism and open borders in the Diaspora in the West], for liberals narrow nationalists [Jews support ethnonationalism for themselves, in Israel].”

Different environments, different strategies

There’s no contradiction in what Goldstein reports. Jews pursue different strategies and espouse different ideologies in different environments, and different groups of non-Jews have different interests that are compromised or furthered by Jewish interests—e.g., a principled leftist who loathes what Israeli ethnonationalism and the suffering of the Palestinians but loves the power of the organized Jewish community in support of leftist causes in the diaspora. Like Jews, non-Jews often have different interests depending on the situation. But one thing remains constant: Jewish pursuit of What’s Best for Jews. Accordingly, Jews promote open borders and universalism in goyish nations like Britain and America, while pursuing “narrow nationalism” in their own nation of Israel. And there’s no contradiction in thinking that Jews can be both communist and capitalist, as Ron Unz has shown at the Unz Review:

Perhaps the most utterly explosive and totally suppressed aspect of the close relationship between Jews and Communism regards the claims that Jacob Schiff and other top international Jewish bankers were among the leading financial backers of the Bolshevik Revolution. I spent nearly all of my life regarding these vague rumors as such obvious absurdities that they merely demonstrated the lunatic anti-Semitism infesting the nether-regions of Far Right anti-Communist movements, thereby fully confirming the theme of Richard Hofstadter’s famous book The Paranoid Style in American Politics. Indeed, the Schiff accusations were so totally ridiculous that they were never even once mentioned in the hundred-odd books on the history of the Bolshevik Revolution and Soviet Communism that I read during the 1970s and 1980s.

Therefore, it came as an enormous shock when I discovered that the claims were not only probably correct, but had been almost universally accepted as true throughout the first half of the twentieth century.

For example, The “Jewish Threat” by Joseph W. Bendersky summarizes his years of archival research and he documents that Schiff’s financial support for the Bolsheviks was widely reported in the American Military Intelligence files of the period, with British Intelligence taking the same position. Kenneth D. Ackerman’s 2016 study Trotsky in New York, 1917 describes much the same material. In 1925, the British Guardian published this information and it was soon widely discussed and accepted throughout the 1920s and 1930s by numerous major international media outlets. Naomi W. Cohen’s 1991 hagiographic volume Jacob Schiff devotes several pages to summarizing the various stories of Schiff’s strong Bolshevik ties that had earlier been published in leading American periodicals.

Writing nearly a century after the events under discussion, these three Jewish authors casually dismiss all the numerous accounts they provide by highly-credible observers — American and British Intelligence officers and prominent international journalists — as merely demonstrating the delusional nature of the extreme anti-Semitism that had infected so much of the world in those bygone days. Yet most serious historians would surely place far greater weight upon contemporaneous evidence than upon the personal opinions of those writers who happen to gather together that material evidence generations afterward. (“American Pravda: How Hitler Saved the Allies,” Ron Unz, 13th May 2019)

The Jewish capitalist Jacob Schiff, based in America, did indeed assist the Jewish communist Leon Trotsky, based in Russia in the long campaign by Jewish organizations to topple the Czar because of his Jewish policies. In different environments, Jews pursue different strategies to meet the all-important goal of What’s Best for Jews. And if communism had also come to America, capitalism would have been overthrown but Jewish supremacy would have remained in place. In fact, communism is now coming to America with the Biden presidency. But it’s no longer hostile to capitalism. Under the senile and probably soon-to-depart Joe Biden, the new Democratic administration will further enrich billionaires and the big banks even as it ruthlessly attacks Whites and Western civilization.

The Joys of Judaeocracy: How Jews are in charge of the so-called Biden administration

It’s a “Democratic” administration in name only, of course. In reality, it’s a Judaeocratic administration working for Jewish interests and Israel. That’s why it will encourage all other races in America to continue working for their own interests. Except one race: the race that actually built America and has been responsible for America’s astonishing scientific, technological and cultural achievements. Whites will not be allowed to work for their own interests. Any attempt by Whites to do so will, of course, continue to be anathematized as “white supremacy.” That’s yet another example of how Jews believe in the audacity of mendacity. Jews like Janet Yellen and Anthony Blinken lie as naturally as they breathe. After all, lies are What’s Best for Jews.

50 replies
  1. Junghans
    Junghans says:

    Influence and power in America has obviously been usurped by Jewry. Yet, because of the intellectual programing and general credulity of the ‘host’ population, the Jewish masquerade party continues unabated. Woe to those deluded, or blindsided “Goyim” who fall victim to this lethal charade.

  2. Conrad Gaarder
    Conrad Gaarder says:

    There is a passage in Kevin MacDonald’s “Culture of Critique” (or perhaps another of his books) where someone (Belloc?) is quoted, describing his walking along the street in Paris and seeing a rich capitalist banker of some kind walking with a communist revolutionary, both Jewish, and engaged in animated, convivial conversation. The writer suddenly sees the Jews’ diversity but fundamental unity.
    Does anyone recall who they were?

  3. Coronus Hoxus
    Coronus Hoxus says:

    That’s true. I had a relationship with a Zio woman without knowing this. Afterwards I knew why she was how she was.

  4. Kyle McDermott
    Kyle McDermott says:

    Great article, thank you. Here’s a potential honorary-mention for your list; according to Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doug_Emhoff):

    Douglas Craig Emhoff is an American lawyer who is the current second gentleman of the United States. He is married to Vice President Kamala Harris. As the first-ever husband of a U.S. vice president, Emhoff is the first second gentleman in American history. He is also the first Jewish spouse of a vice president

  5. Anne C
    Anne C says:

    Your humour is cathartic as always, Tobias. Thank you.

    The Irish Savant was quoted in the article – does anyone know if he has been able to resuscitate his blog? It looks like Blogger has finally come after him for ostensibly violating Blogger’s “Terms of Service.” I’d be grateful if anyone can shed light on his whereabouts on the web.

  6. Jacobite
    Jacobite says:

    Jacob Schiff was a multi-threat man. Besides funding the Bolsheviks, he fronted Adolph Ochs the gelt to buy the New York Times — talk about return on investment! He also backed the Japanese military modernization in aid of the Russo-Japanese War (another attempt to overthrow the Tsar). Just as McCarthy described the web of US Communist fronts and spy networks as “a conspiracy so vast” that it was literally incredible to ordinary Americans. Yet, even at that, he didn’t uncover more than the top of the iceberg. Jews and Europeans have brains that operate in distinct ways, and makes them mutually unintelligible. This leaves Europeans at a disadvantage in dealing with Jewish aggression, but it also makes Jews prone to self-defeating arrogance and ham-handed (so to speak) overreach in their never-ending war against the West. The latest development is the Jewish ability to recruit the non-white peoples of the world into their anti-Western crusade.

  7. Peter London
    Peter London says:

    There is certainly no contradiction in the idea that Jews are in the forefront of Communism and Capitalism. It’s very simple. If you are trying to tear something in half you need to pull in opposite directions.

  8. Dwindling Empire
    Dwindling Empire says:

    I wonder how the last 20 years would have panned if there had been 20,000 American peacekeeping Troops stationed in Israel as per the recommendation cited in a 2001 paper written by the Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS).


    ” It (the study) calls Israel’s armed forces a “500-pound gorilla in Israel. Well armed and trained. Operates in both Gaza . Known to disregard international law to accomplish mission. Very unlikely to fire on American forces (??? -ed). Fratricide a concern especially in air space management.”

    Of the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, the SAMS officers say: “Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.” “

  9. TJ
    TJ says:

    A beaming Beni gushed: “Blessed are you, lord our God, king of the universe, who has granted us life, sustained us, and enabled us

    The great enabler and sustainer of Jewry is the talented White male. . .

  10. Karl
    Karl says:

    Israel does not allow illegal immigration and is very strict.

    But in America, Jews (in general, not all) seem unconcerned about illegal aliens flooding over the southern border.

    Have these Jews (and other Americans who favor illegal immigration) ever considered that there is a long-standing legal way to go about appyling for entrance to the US and that people who apply legally are left out in the cold while illegals simply cross the borders?

    There is no doubt that Jews are in the forefront of advocating for unrestrained immigration.

  11. Kevin Moore
    Kevin Moore says:

    The Jews are of Esau from Idumea, and therefore not of Israel or Judah; Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925, vol. 5, page 41.

    “Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a Jew or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or Hebrew.” Jewish Almanac 1980.

    Arabs are Semites, Jews before the Edomite intergration were Hamites!

    The people who call themselves Jews were at one time Hamites – NOT Semites.

    Judah married and had sons to the daughter of foreign gods——a Canaanite woman. Malachi, chapter 3 & 2:11., Genesis 38:1-10 who later intermarried with the children of Esau/Edom.

    Herod was an Edomite.

    Roman general Hyrcanus captured Edom/Idumea and its population was integrated into the Judean community around 126BC

    A Jewish Mother decides legal status

    It’s not a point of view it is the Jews law –

    “………..There are situations in Jewish law where, even in the course of a sexual relationship, no paternity is established. According to Jewish law, the child of a relationship between a Jew and a Gentile always assumes the legal status of its mother. The child bears no legal relationship to its father. See Babylonian Talmud, Yevamot 22a-b; Jacob ben Asher, Tur, Even Haezer ch. 16. This is equally true in cases of artificial insemination…………”

    To be an Orthodox Jew is to agree with the Talmud that, “It is permitted to deceive a goy.” (Baba Kama 113b)

    See, “The Book of Adam and Eve”. S.C.Malan., quote – chapter 4,

    “Then after this Judah took to himself a wife whose name was habwadiya, that means, “house-wife” but in the law her name is Sewa. She was of a Caananitish family, and Jacobs heart suffered much on that account;and he said to Judah his son who had married that wife, “The God of Abraham and of Isaac will not allow the seed of this Canaanitish woman to mingle with my seed.”………. “……….Then Judah married his son Onan to Tamar, saying, “He shall raise seed unto thy brother.” But him also did God kill because of his evil deeds; on account of Jacobs curse, “That no Canaanitish seed should mingle with his own.” So God would not let any of it mingle with that of Jacob the righteous. Therefore did Tamar go to Judah her father-in-law, who had intercourse with her, not knowing she was his sons wife; and she bare unto him twins, Pharez and Zarah.” [Genesis 38:6-30]

    ……. Chapter 6, ………… “After this, there began to issue a race from Naason [a descendent of Pharez], who was great among the sons of Judah; and from him began a kingdom and a priesthood, and the Jews became celebrated through him…….” Gen. 38:11-30, Ruth 4:18-22

    Canaan: a son of Ham, [Genesis 10:6]., Cursed by Noah, [Genesis 9:20-26]., Idolatrous, [Deut. 29:17] ., Defiled, [Lev. 18:24-27]

    The Jews and Arabs are related – “Esau thereupon takes a daughter of Ishmael to wife” (Gen. xxviii. 9).

    Ishmael who took an Egyptian for a wife is the patriarch of the Arab nations.

    Roman general Hyrcanus captured Edom/Idumea and its population was integrated into the Judean community around 126BC

    Don’t Deny Jewish History and Culture by Calling Us “White”

    Micha Danzig — Forward (New York)

    Anyone that understands Jewish history as well as the history of the entire development of the idea or construct of the “white race” should understand how that no Jew, Ashkenazi or otherwise, is “white.” While it is certainly the case that many Ashkenazi Jews today in America (such as Ruiz-Grossman) identify as “white,” that doesn’t make it any more accurate or appropriate … This is not merely a semantic issue. Jews are not “white.” We are a tribal people from the Levant … No one that wants to end anti-Semitism and to fight against bigotry and racism should be claiming that Jews are “white.”


    • Tsigantes
      Tsigantes says:

      “We are a tribal people from the Levant”

      Hebrews are NOT from the Levant. They are a tribe from Arabia (ie Bedouins) who migrated north from what today is the point where north Yemen meets Saudi Arabia, and earlier than that from other places in Arabia.. Nor did they ‘take over’ Palestine or Judea – much as today they clustered in certain areas, and these areas changed over time. They only achieved their goal of conquering Palestine in 1946. Herodotus, who spent decades
      travelling through the Levant and particularly Palestine, where he recorded geographical, botanic, zoological, ethnic and cultural facts in encyclopaedic detail, makes no mention of Hebrews – either as a people, or a language and especially not as a political entity.

      Today’s Hebrews are from many places, in particular today’s Ukraine but including China, because their tribal beliefs became an ideology adopted by others. Thus Hebrews are of various stocks – in the crude American racialist terms they are “Caucasian” [“white”] , “yellow”, “black”. “The jews” are not a race but an ideology.

  12. Degrelle
    Degrelle says:

    @Conrad Gaarder – The reference is about Heinrich Heine (Jewish proto-communist revolutionary and writer/poet) being a big friend of the Jewish banker uber-capitalist James Rothschild in Paris (1840s). The “unusual” relationship was noticed and commented about by Honore de Balzac “Voilà, tout deux juifs!” (“Here, both Jews!”). E. Michael Jones mentions this in his book “Barren Metal”.

    • Alfred
      Alfred says:

      It’s a shame.

      Also a good lesson. Anyone writing this sort of thing should back up and archive everything they publish, offline (not on an online or cloud drive, obviously), in case it’s suddenly taken offline by the censors.

  13. Cassandro
    Cassandro says:

    As a former politician once told me: “You catch more bees with honey than vinegar.”

    It’s not neough to say what we’re against. We have to stand FOR something. We must offer the promise of a better future.

    “Jews this,” “degenerates that,” “Lefists the other” might well be true beyond all reasonable doubt, but how does it advance our interests? That’s always the key. Always look at the opportunity cost of writing an article like this versus writing one that promotes us or suggests realistic actions that we can take.

    What readers of this site presumably want more than anything (has anyone even polled the readers explicitly?) is hope. There is no hope out there. There is no hope in the broader culture, in the youth, or in politics.

    Case in point: I’d stake good money that 99.9% of commenters on here are using pseudonyms. I know I am. Do radical Lefitists on Twitter do the same? No, because they’ve essentially won. Winners don’t hide. They gloat and celebrate in public.

    In addition, whiteness is, in my opinion, simply too abstract a concept to unite anyone behind. Biden is white. Blair is white. Merkel is white. The Clintons, the Bushes, Nancy Pelosi, Jeff Bezos, Jack Dorsey, AOC, Steven Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel – hell, even Elizabeth Warren – are all white, yet they’re all enemies. They couldn’t be included in a new state of our making.

    If all this is to be anything more than a pointless talking shop, people are going to have to come out of the shadows, drop the negativity, and focus on the realistic, real-world positives.

    Post-covid, we need to meet up and launch the lifeboat. This ship of state cannot be saved. It is holed beneath the waterline. Only a few, if any, can be saved, and pointing out how many Jews there are in Biden’s cabinet, how undue and outsized their influence is, and how the US has been betrayed by Israel and the Israelis in the furthreance of their own interests doesn’t advance our interests one nanomatre.

    I wish for the day when we live in an Israel-like state and are led by someone of the caliber of Netanyahu – someone willing to do whatever it takes to defend his people. In that sense, I really do envy the Jews.

  14. Ned J. Casper
    Ned J. Casper says:

    Antony Sutton’s book on Wall Street and Bolshevism suggested that Schiff supported the Kerensky “revolution” but was opposed to the Bolsheviks. Informed comments, please.
    Keep an eye open for ascendant UK TV comedian David Baddiel’s book “Jews Don’t Count” (sic) just published by the “Times Literary Supplement” and no comments on his physiognomy, please.

      • Ned J. Casper
        Ned J. Casper says:

        I did not make a “case” for Baddiel, who started off as a nasty TV comedian. On the contrary, he is exactly what you say and not much good at it. But “celebrity” is what counts in Britain today, not sense. The “victims” are the totems.

    • Henry
      Henry says:

      You mean he was a “shareholder.” The BoE was nationalised in 1946 and the shareholders were paid off.

    • Henry
      Henry says:

      For whatever reason Sutton was wrong re Schiff who dealt with the Bolsheviks via the American Red Cross mission to Russia. Schiff was the treasurer for the Red Cross and financial support went through him with the The National City Bank acting as a conduit via its branches in St Petersberg and Moscow. Schiff had been a director of that bank for 16 years but suddenly resigned from the board in July 1914, citing ‘limitations’ imposed on him by the recently introduced Federal Reserve Bank legislation. However he remained a major shareholder. According to his NYTimes obituary, Kerensky spent his years in exile complaining bitterly that the “bankers” had stabbed him in the back.

  15. Rae West
    Rae West says:

    Not for the first time, I almost despair at the ignorance of whites. I remember the feeling from the 1950s, in fact, which I hadn’t thought about for decades.

    Langdon talks about Pollard, but in the fathomlessly silly language of Jew liars. ‘Niuclear weapons’ are a fraud, and never existed: anyone can look at old film of supposed tests and see that. Pollard handed over no secrets. The whole operation was a vastly successful Jewish fraud. Why not look at http://www.nukelies.org which has been there since 2012?

    I note someone mention another perennial weed, the Dreyfus Affair. It was just a multi-media operation round about 1900, when film was as recent as TV was in the so-called ‘Cold War’.

    I see someone mention ‘Mein Kampf’, the view of Hitler, years out of date; obviously WW2 was orchestrated by Jews in their world-wide dance. Look for example at big-lies.org/hexzane527/ for examples of the obviously intentional activities of Hitler in joining with Stalin, Roosevelt and Churchill to get whites to kill each other in satisfying numbers.

    A previous piece discusses ‘revolution’ as though Jewish tales are true. It takes the tales of 1776 as true, when presumably many people are aware that British-Jewish money ran the new Union, the supposed federation of states in fact with a single centre.

    That previous piece included the fake death roll in 9/11; nobody commented on its absurdity.

    I suppose it’s a matter for thanks that this site hasn’t endless sentences on Judah. Aramaic, Edomites, Herod, Arabs, Ham, Biblical stuff … ad nauseam.

    Most of this stuff goes back before Cromwell and ‘Lords Spiritual’ and the Bank of England. I recommend people to read articles by Miles Mathis on what he calles ‘The Phoenician Navy’.

    In his own recent words: All the Presidents, all the Justices, all the Governors, all the scientists, all the historians, all the artists, all the actors, all the politicians, all the newscasters, all the directors, all the producers. … They are all Jewish close cousins, and their families have been running the world via lies and conjobs for at least 4000 years. And that isn’t some wild claim I make, based on a stray hair or on channeling aliens or on fake Q-level clearance: it is based on years of in-depth research, which is posted in plain English on the internet right now.

    • Ned J. Casper
      Ned J. Casper says:

      Nuclear weapons all imaginary? And nuclear energy? Miles Mathis an authority – who considers this website part of the “controlled opposition”? Only Rerevisionists are not among all the Jewish cousins running the whole world for “at least” 4000 years according to research posted on the internet which has escaped their control? McDonald and Blogrollers, you might as well all give up and give in now, which presumably would suit the ADL, AIPAC, WJC, SPLC, NYT, PBS….&c

      • Rae West
        Rae West says:

        For other people, note that Mathis says things which Jews are very anxious not to air. I’m always amused at the Jew-style unevidenced attempts to attack him (or them). One of his memes – a result of years of looking at genealogies – is that all the people forced into ‘the news’ are in the same set of families. I quote what he says; if you can disprove this, go ahead.
        On the ‘nukes’ issues, anyone interested might download this > 3 hour video, three voices including mine. It took me a lot of work and includes a lot of material identifiable as Jewish in style. I called it ‘Lords of the Nukes’ as a suggestion that, if you can watch a Lord of the Rings episode, you might watch this too.

        • Ned J. Casper
          Ned J. Casper says:

          The phrase “controlled opposition” is usually used to describe criticism of Jewish activities which are qualified by positive explanations or which refer in a friendly manner to Jews like (say) Ron Unz or David Cole, or to Jewish anti-Zionists or to Zionists who also oppose the Islamification of Europe.

          Raevisionism and other blog contributions prompt an alternative view. Let us suppose that a group of astute and well-informed group of Jews, who are apprehensive about the rise of online antisemitism and/or hostility to Israel, and/or the bad impression made by financially unscrupulous Jews or prominent criminals of Jewish background.

          Their way to “control” opposition could be to post (1) totally ludicrous assertions about Jews or anyone/anything else that no sensible person could rationally believe; (2) claims that every Jew is incorrigibly evil; (3) incitements to harm people who have committed no crime just because they are Jewish; (4) advocate a “real” holocaust, instead of the one of which Hitler was incorrectly accused, e.g, turning Jews to “ash” (Tito Perdue).

          The most effective way in modern circumstances not just to control opposition but to neutralise it altogether?

          • Rae West
            Rae West says:

            I don’t know if this is supposed to be a reply to me, since it addresses none of my points, but in case it is, let me take this phrase by Ned J. Casper:
            1) totally ludicrous assertions about Jews or anyone/anything else that no sensible person could rationally believe;
            The point of course is that with total Jewish media control of big media, Jews can flood so much garbage that it’s difficult to know what should be rationally believed by sensible persons.

      • the watcher
        the watcher says:

        The fact you are telling people to “give up” is suspicious in itself crank! Also, who on earth is Miles Mathis, as I have never heard of him? Next you will be claiming that Hollywood is not actually run by Jews ala Alex Jones lol!

    • John
      John says:

      Thank you, Jewish troll. If nuclear weapons are such a hoax, then why did Israel pay Pollard so much for the information? 2nd, he sold them a lot of other intelligence too. Like who were the undercover US agents in communist countries. A lot of people died because of that Jew. He should have been executed like the Rosenbergs were.

      • Rae West
        Rae West says:

        John – you’re so credulous, it’s no wonder Jews laugh at ‘goyim’. I’d suggest you read some of my website, but of course you won’t. Hurry up and get injected instead

Comments are closed.