The Massive Influx of Non-Whites Is Bad for the West

Shakira is a Colombian pop-star. Shakira Martin is a Black student-leader. For thousands of years their ancestors occupied different physical and cultural environments, and were subject to different evolutionary pressures.

Two very different Shakiras

Shak Attack

That’s why the two Shakiras belong to separate races of Homo sapiens. They’re genetically and phenotypically different — and that involves far more than their skin and hair. Their bones and body-chemistry are different too. So are their brains. Shakira the pop-star is famous for being svelte, sexy and seductive. Shakira the student-leader may become famous for being crude, aggressive and obnoxious:

NUS president Shakira Martin accused of bullying at union HQ

National Union of Students leader denies allegations and claims she is victim of racism

The National Union of Students [NUS] is conducting an investigation after allegations of bullying and intimidation were made against the NUS president, Shakira Martin, by fellow officers. … Martin vehemently denied being a bully and said bullying should play no part in student politics. She said she felt traumatised by the attacks against her on social media, which had brought her close to quitting her role, and claimed they fed into a stereotype of an angry black woman. …

“I’m a strong, outspoken, articulate black woman that likes piercings and tattoos and I’ve got swagger. I’m not going to change myself. I’m not going to be anything but Shakira — rough around the edges, straight talking, authentic, real Shakira.” (NUS president Shakira Martin accused of bullying at union HQ, The Guardian, 31st January 2018)

Shakira Martin has got “swagger” because she’s got testosterone: she’s much more masculine than Shakira the pop-star. Accordingly, she’s also much less attractive. Black women are, on average, the least popular group in the sexual market-place and they often complain not just that Black men are dating White women, but that the mass media encourage this behaviour by the constant depiction of Black men with White women. They’re right: the mass media do encourage this behaviour. It’s part of a Jewish agenda of race-mixing and harms the White women who succumb to it, because they suffer much higher rates of violence and abandonment with Black partners. It also harms Black women, who are deprived of partners with whom they are more compatible and more likely to have successful relationships.

Playing the racism card

The sexual and romantic frustrations of Black women no doubt contribute to their higher levels of aggression. But their aggression would be high anyway: the accusations of bullying against Shakira Martin are no surprise. Nor is her response: she says that “she is a victim of ‘racism and classism’.” Non-Whites have found accusations of racism a very effective way to intimidate Whites and deflect attention from their own failings. In this case, the accusation may not work so well, because some of Martin’s accusers are themselves non-White:

Hareem Ghani, the NUS Women’s Officer, announced she would be filing a complaint to the NUS based on [Martin’s] ‘deeply dangerous behaviour’, such as threatening and bullying officers ‘over the course of the last 6 months.’ She later added: ‘I will no longer be going into NUS HQ until the complaint is concluded,’ ending ‘if only you all knew half the shit we’ve dealt with in the last 2 months especially.’ (NUS President accused of bullying NUS officers, The Cambridge Student, 27th January 2018)

Hareem Ghani is probably a West Asian Muslim, maybe a Pakistani or Bangladeshi, and although those groups are often very hostile to Blacks, it’s difficult for Blacks to accuse them of racism. Why so? Because the official ideology of anti-racism prefers to ignore hostility and prejudice by non-Whites against other non-Whites. It certainly ignores hostility and prejudice by non-Whites against Whites.

Again with the Agenda

Again we see a Jewish agenda at work. The agenda promotes what you might call oligolatry or “minority worship,” in which minorities are only ever victims, never villains. Whites, by contrast, are only ever villains. When minorities like Blacks and Pakistanis fail in Britain, it is because of White racism; when minorities like Chinese and Gujaratis succeed, it is despite White racism (which should, but of course doesn’t, make these activists question their dogma that there are no differences between the races).

And amid the incessant criticism of British Whites for excluding minorities from positions of power, one highly significant fact goes unmentioned. See if you can spot what it is:

The Colour of Power: Revealed: Britain’s most powerful elite is 97% white

Exclusive: just 36 of 1,000 most powerful people are from ethnic minorities, despite decades of anti-discrimination laws

Barely 3% of Britain’s most powerful and influential people are from black and minority ethnic groups, according to a broad new analysis that highlights startling inequality despite decades of legislation to address discrimination. From a list of just over 1,000 of the UK’s top political, financial, judicial, cultural and security figures drawn up by the Guardian in partnership with Operation Black Vote and in consultation with academics, only 36 (3.4%) were from ethnic minorities (BAME). Just seven (0.7%) were BAME women. …

The numbers betray a grotesque disconnect with the composition of the UK population, almost 13% of which has a minority background. In some sectors — the police, military, supreme court and security services as well as top consultancies and law firms — there were no non-white supremos at all. Equality advocates said the new study shone a light on the glass ceilings, subtle discrimination and “affinity bias” that minorities face as a matter of course in their careers. The toll is severe, on individuals, communities, and society as a whole, they said. (Revealed: Britain’s most powerful elite is 97% white, The Guardian, 24th September 2017)

Schrödinger’s Tribe

The unmentioned fact in the article is that “Britain’s most powerful elite” is disproportionately Jewish. The “grotesque disconnect” and “severe toll” mentioned above were identified by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which is headed by the Jewish activist Rebecca Hilsenrath. The Jewish Chronicle called her “The Woman with the Best Job in the World,” because she’s leading the fight against the evils of White oppression. But she herself is a perfect example both of Jewish over-representation in the liberal elite and of the Jewish refusal to admit or discuss this over-representation. Jews are what you might call Schrödinger’s Tribe. Just as, in quantum physics, Schrödinger’s cat is simultaneously alive and not-alive, so, in anti-racism, Schrödinger’s Tribe are simultaneously a minority and not-a-minority, just as it suits them to be.

Rebecca Hilsenrath, Hammer of Honkies

So Jews don’t discuss their status as an overrepresented and hence unrepresentative elite. Instead, they push for White goyim to be replaced by non-Whites in positions of power and responsibility. That’s why the Black woman Shakira Martin became President of the NUS in 2017. It’s also why the Indian woman Kamlesh Bahl became Deputy Vice President of the Law Society in 1998. Bahl proved a very bad appointment: she was proven to be an obnoxious bully and caused years of trouble and expense to the liberals who had appointed her. Shakira Martin looks likely to cause the same. Bahl already had a history of bad behaviour before she was given an even bigger chance to indulge her obnoxiousness, but that history was overlooked because she was non-White and female. Non-White privilege.

A fractured society is an enfeebled society

I’m confident that the same is true of Shakira Martin. Minority worship leads to bad decisions and bad appointments. In short, minority worship is bad for the West. But that’s precisely why Jews promote it. A fractured society is an enfeebled society. As the late Larry Auster put it in an American context: “Jews look at mass Third-World and Moslem immigration, not as a danger to themselves, but as the ultimate guarantor of their own safety, hoping that in a racially diversified, de-Christianized America, the waning majority culture will lack the power, even if it still has the desire, to persecute Jews.”

This remains true when vibrant New Americans and New Britons are hostile to Jews, because their hostility can be used to justify an authoritarian state under Jewish control. Take a look at the Community Security Trust (CST), which describes itself as a “UK charity that advises and represents the Jewish community on matters of antisemitism, terrorism, policing and security.” The CST goes on to boast that it “is recognised by government and the Police as a best practice model of a minority community security organisation.” What does “best practice” mean? It means dishonesty, ethnocentrism and unrelenting support for censorship and the surveillance state. The CST has just released its Antisemitic Incidents Report 2017. The report will be treated with the utmost seriousness by British politicians and media, despite the triviality of many of the incidents it highlights:

  • London, April. Bacon was thrown over the wall of a synagogue and found in the grounds.
  • London, May. A Jewish man’s home was hit with pork and eggs.
  • London, May. A Jewish man was called a “Jewish B***ard” on the phone.
  • London, June. A Jewish charity was targeted with the tweet, “The Holocaust is a lie.”
  • London, July. Graffiti was found on a bus stop that read, “Adolf Hitler was right.”
  • London, August. A pro-Palestinian video was put on in a museum.
  • Brighton, September. A man approached a synagogue and shouted towards congregants, “Free Palestine.”
  • London, October. Graffiti reading “Banks, Media, Holohoax and 9/11” was found along a canal. (Antisemitic Incidents Report 2017)

Meanwhile, the heavily Jewish media in Britain continually promote the idea that Whites are racist and that non-Whites are their helpless victims. That’s much more serious hate than graffiti “found on a bus stop” and “along a canal.” And how many of the incidents recorded by the CST were genuine examples of “antisemitism”? The wave of anti-Jewish hate that struck America in 2017 was largely driven by a Jewish-Israeli teenager sending anonymous threats, with assistance from an unbalanced left-wing Black journalist who was trying to harass an ex-girlfriend. In Britain too, what appears to be antisemitism can be nothing of the kind:

Woman who made synagogue hoax bomb threat jailed for three years

A Jewish mother who made a hoax bomb call to a synagogue as part of a campaign of harassment against another Jewish parent was jailed for three years today. Claire Mann, 43, bombarded Roz Page with abusive messages after a dispute over a children’s party. She then tried to frame Mrs Page by sending similar texts to her own phone. …

Sentencing at Wood Green Crown Court, Judge Robert Morrison told Mann: “This all arose when you thought your daughter was not invited to a birthday party for a schoolmate. You started a campaign against the child’s mother that was spiteful and malicious. You bought a pay-as-you-go, unregistered phone and sent texts to yourself to support a claim you made to the police. You later used the same phone to send a message alleging a bomb had been placed close to hotels, close to a synagogue.” (Woman who made synagogue hoax bomb threat jailed for three years, The Jewish Chronicle, 17th October 2016 / 15th Tishrei 5777)

If the truth hadn’t been uncovered, that bomb-threat might well have been recorded as the CST as a serious hate-crime against Jews. It seems very likely that other apparent hate-crimes against Jews in Britain are also carried out by Jews. After all, such hoaxes kill two birds with one stone: the hoaxers cause distress to their individual targets and benefit Jews as a whole by making them seem like victims. What’s not to like? This also explains why mass immigration by antisemites can be beneficial to Jews. The CST’s report contains this interesting section:

CST received a physical description of the incident offender in 420, or 30 per cent, of the 1,382 antisemitic incidents recorded during 2017. Of these, 225 offenders (54 per cent) were described as ‘White — North European’; 13 offenders (three per cent) were described as ‘White — South European’; 77 offenders (18 per cent) were described as ‘Black’; 74 offenders (18 per cent) were described as ‘South Asian’; one offender (0.2 per cent) was described as ‘Far East or South East Asian’; and 30 offenders (seven per cent) were described as ‘Arab or North African’. (Antisemitic Incidents Report 2017)

At “54 per cent,” Whites are substantially under-represented as antisemites, while Blacks, “South Asians” and “Arabs or North Africans” are substantially over-represented. Therefore, as the White share of the population falls and the non-White share rises, antisemitism will also rise. If the CST genuinely cared about protecting individual Jews from antisemitism, it would oppose mass immigration, particularly by groups like Muslims who are much more hostile to Jews.

Equality = Discrimination

But the CST doesn’t genuinely care about protecting individual Jews. Instead, it cares about promoting an “anti-racist” ideology in which Jews and other minorities are helpless victims whose plight demands ever more censorship and surveillance. This ideology has metastasized to the point where, under British law, equal treatment is proof of discrimination:

Two asylum seekers have won a legal challenge against the government when a high court judge ruled on Thursday that it was a breach of their human rights to allow smoking in immigration detention centres. The two men, both Muslims, also succeeded in a claim that they should have an option for prayer other than next to uncovered cell toilets, which they described as “deeply embarrassing and humiliating”. Mr Justice Holman agreed that forcing Muslim detainees to pray next to toilets when locked in their cells overnight amounted to indirect discrimination and that allowing smoking in “enclosed or substantially enclosed areas” was unlawful. …

Lewis Kett, of Duncan Lewis solicitors, said: “We welcome the findings that the home secretary has had absolutely no regard to the potential discriminatory effect of the lock-in regime at Brook House on Muslim detainees and their right to properly practise their religion. Our clients have been forced to pray next to unsanitary and unscreened toilets in cramped conditions. The home secretary must now immediately take steps to remedy this.” (Asylum seekers win case over smoking in immigration detention centres, The Guardian, 1st February 2018)

In other words, when Muslims in a non-Muslim country are treated exactly like non-Muslims, this is “indirect discrimination” that requires privileges for Muslims. Can you imagine a Muslim country accepting such a claim if it were advanced on behalf of Christians? I can’t. Britain now has a legal system that works against the interests of the White British, benefiting instead non-Whites and the greedy, parasitic lawyers who represent them.

Little white slag

And would any White Briton be able to sue the government for suffering harm because of immigration? No, the concept of “harm to Whites” doesn’t exist in official ideology. “Hatred against Whites” isn’t a concept either. Instead, Whites are villains, never victims. But in reality Whites are constant targets of non-White hatred and violence. Look at this story from 2015 about one of the many thousands of White British girls sexually abused by non-White men since mass immigration began after the Second World War:

The girl, who cannot be named, accuses 15 men of sexually abusing her when she was 13 and 14 during a 13-month ordeal. Fourteen of the men, aged 17 to 62, are on trial at Bradford crown court. They deny a total of 28 charges between them.

The jury on Wednesday was shown a police video interview of the girl filmed shortly after she was taken into care in June 2012. She detailed how the alleged abuse began when she befriended a young drug dealer called Arif Choudry, who effectively pimped her out to his friends in Keighley, West Yorkshire. The men, she claimed, raped her at various deserted locations, including in an underground car park, in parks, and behind a library and leisure centre. …

On the video, she told police that when she tried to stop working for Choudry, he called her a “little white slag” [= slut] and a “little white bastard”. He then pinned her to the ground and raped her, she said. … The girl, who is now 18, only disclosed that Choudry had been her first rapist when she was taken into care and told police he was just the first of a string of [non-White Muslim] men to rape her — most of whom were introduced to her by Choudry. (Keighley girl lied about pregnancy and abortion to police, court told, The Guardian, 11th November 2015)

Was Choudry guilty of a hate-crime when he raped the girl after calling her a “little white slag” and a “little white bastard”? Not in official ideology, which prefers to ignore all evidence of anti-White hate. And note that what the girl suffered in Keighley was far more serious than anything recorded by the pro-Jewish CST. But there is no officially supported pro-White organization to record crimes like that and produce any equivalent of the CST’s Antisemitic Incidents Report. Nor is there any such organization to condemn the Guardian for the “insensitive” and “victim-blaming” headline it used for the story: “Keighley girl lied about pregnancy and abortion to police, court told.”

Gary and the Ghanaian

Were mistakes made by a raped girl the most important aspect of that case? Apparently they were to the Guardian, which is a prime example of the harm done by “anti-racism.” Recall the damning words of the Labour MP Ann Cryer when she was trying to combat “large-scale paedophile abuse” by Muslim men in her northern constituency. She received absolutely no help from Britain’s foremost feminist newspaper: “I couldn’t get The Guardian interested. Its reporters seemed paralysed by political correctness.” In other words, the Guardian is paralysed by its inability to admit the truth. Decade after decade, it has invested heavily in two lies: that race does not exist and that White racism is the root of all racial evil. Black journalists like Gary Younge and Afua Hirsch have built their entire careers on these lies and are not going to abandon them of their own accord:

Join the Guardian’s editor-at-large Gary Younge in conversation [with] writer and broadcaster Afua Hirsch for a discussion about race, class and national identity in modern Britain.

Gary Younge and Afua Hirsch

In her first book, Brit(ish), Hirsch, Sky presenter and former Guardian writer, explores our troubled relationship with history through her personal story as the daughter of a white Jewishfather and Ghanaian-British mother. Former US correspondent Gary Younge, the British-born son of a single mother from Barbados, has written extensively on the perils and potential of identity politics, not least in his 2010 book Who Are We — and Should It Matter in the 21st Century?

Join them for a discussion of some of the uncomfortable facts about race and identity in Britain today, as it relates to everything from slavery to Brexit and Meghan Markle to Black Lives Matter. How would coming to terms with our past help us navigate our present? What is wrong with insisting on being colour-blind? And why does the simple question: “Where are you from?” still sound so fraught to so many? (Gary Younge and Afua Hirsch: Brit(ish), The Guardian, details of event planned for 15th March 2018)

Note the phrase “uncomfortable facts about race and identity in Britain today.” Ideologues like Younge and Hirsh don’t deal in uncomfortable facts, but in comfortable illusions: namely, that Blacks bear no responsibility for their own failure and that Blacks such as themselves enjoy no more success than they deserve. In fact, Younge and Hirsch have risen on affirmative action, not on their own merit. They are mediocre writers with mediocre intellects who continually criticize and undermine an advanced technological society that Blacks like themselves could never sustain on their own, let alone create.

No luck required

But Blacks like Young and Hirsch are performing one very useful function for Whites. So are Blacks like Shakira Martin. When Whites from Eastern Europe see the pathologies and posturing of non-Whites in Britain, they are strengthened in their determination not to allow mass immigration into their homelands. Nations like Poland and Hungary will not be suffering either suicide-bombing by Libyan Muslims or self-righteous lectures by Black anti-racists.

You could say “Lucky Poland” and “Lucky Hungary,” but that would be entirely wrong. Luck has nothing to do with it. All that counts is democracy: unlike Britain, America and other Western nations, Eastern Europe is not governed by a hostile elite determined to destroy its White inhabitants with vibrancy.

77 replies
  1. GeorgeKocan
    GeorgeKocan says:

    I recall some years ago, Oprah Winfrey, the black darling of daytime television and billionaire, devoted her show to the subject of interracial dating. She defended the argument that black women were losing out to white women in sexual/marriage competition. Smart and competent black women could not compete with white women for the attentions of successful black men. I also do not recall any long screeds about the racism of Oprah and the left-behind black women.

    • Peter
      Peter says:

      I suspect that many blacks have a low opinion of themselves, despite their complaints about “racism” and “white privilege”. They consider whites (and perhaps Asians) to be trophies and they’ve come to this conclusion on their own.

      All the propaganda by the Jewish media encouraging white women to idolize black athletes won’t make up for the facts.

      • Michael Adkins
        Michael Adkins says:


        “They consider whites (and perhaps Asians) to be trophies and they’ve come to this conclusion on their own.”

        Think genetics before anything else. Members of the African and Jewish communities see European men and women not only as trophies, but as a way of improving their genetic makeup.

  2. Charlie
    Charlie says:

    I don’t understand why Whites allow the conversation to be dominated by this Global Warming nonsense when the REAL issue at hand is OVERPOPULATION. Whites are only a tiny minority of the worlds population and have been very successful and have attempted some measures of being stewards of the land. The browns and the yellows are the predominate population groups and have destroyed all of their own ancestral lands and are now destroying White ancestral lands. The browns and yellows are at a break neck pace using up Earth’s resources and are NOT contributing anything to the advancement of the planet. Brown and yellows are parasitic and killing the Earth but no one wants to talk about it.

    • Barkingmad
      Barkingmad says:

      It is hard to get anyone to talk about overpopulation. Except maybe for Virginia Abernethy. It has been a Bad Word for some decades now, maybe ever since Sierra Club decided it should not ever be discussed, ever, again.

      • Karen T
        Karen T says:

        The Jew David Gelbaum in the mid 1990’s donated $100 million to the Sierra Club under the condition that not only do they not mention overpopulation but that they support brown/black/yellow immigration into Western lands.

      • Thorgrun
        Thorgrun says:

        The Sierra Club went silent after they received a big lump sum of dollars. They were never heard from again on the Mexico invasion of the US. I remember that in the 70’s overpopulation was coming from these sorts directed at the young fertile Boomers. Oh, and I must mention the “Population Bomb”, by Paul and Ann Ehrlich, another bugaboo of disinformation.

    • HelenChicago
      HelenChicago says:

      Alas, you’re exactly right Charlie. I was shocked to learn several years ago that whites are only 8% or so of Earth’s population. It’s probably a point or two lower by now. And there are those — both white and “white” — who are working overtime to drive that percentage lower still.

  3. Franklin Ryckaert
    Franklin Ryckaert says:

    Colombian pop-star Shakira is of half-Lebanese and half-Spanish descent. Her IQ is 140. The other Shakira shows the typical low IQ, high testosterone and low impulse control of her race. Of course all her dysfunctional behavior is due to “white racism”, since non-Whites like Jews, are categorically innocent and always victims.

    It is about time that Whites start to create their own advocacy organization (a kind of ADL for Whites) to combat anti-White racism, double standards and hypocrisy. Also Jewish privilege should be exposed. Fight the Left with their own weapons ! They cannot denounce their own weapons without exposing their hypocrisy.

    • Irene
      Irene says:

      You’re free to believe her IQ is 140 bc you read it somewhere. There was another Leb guy who claimed to speak 58 languages and then was debunked. Western people are really naive: They believe everything the Semites, the negroes or the Russians tell them!

    • Leon Haller
      Leon Haller says:

      I have advocated this for 30 years. Oh how Whites so desperately need an outlet for pro-White activism. But I am afraid it cannot be anything like TOO – not yet, anyway. What is needed is “gradual radicalization”. Face it: if an all-GOP FedGov cannot even get on with rounding up and deporting millions of ILLEGAL aliens (who aren’t White, and who aren’t high IQ, and who manifestly aren’t necessary), what chance is there to start out broaching the JQ?!

      Hooray for KMac and TOO, but the JQ is the LAST thing to start out with in red-pilling normie Whites. We need to start with implicit Whiteness activism, oriented towards immigration reduction and law-and-order policies, and that will mean confining even discussion of the JQ to sites like this for a very long time.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      Sadly, Mr. Ryckaert, as long as the (((Left))) controls the narrative, it can be as hypocritical as it bloody well pleases and be so with impunity.

    • GeorgeKocan
      GeorgeKocan says:

      I do not like the term ‘whites.’ The emphasis on the racial component ignores moral and cultural issues which are associated with Europeans. I prefer a term something like ‘European Diaspora.’ Certainly, an organization devoted to defending the interests of this Diaspora is welcome. But, obviously that is not enough. Such Europeans need to multiply millionaires and billionaires who can fund needed organizations which can compete directly with the mainstream media and the educational organizations which drive Europeans to socio-cultural suicide.

      • Michael Adkins
        Michael Adkins says:


        I do not like the term ‘whites.’

        A very important point in my opinion. Why should we allow anyone else to name us. Would the Japanese or Jewish communities permit such things?

      • Bob Klinck
        Bob Klinck says:

        Or maybe install a financial system that decentralizes power so that billionaires aren’t the ones determining social policy? The money system as it stands is an artificial construct designed to rob the population of the majority of the fruits of their magnificent technological evolution. Surely in the age of robotics even the dullest can see the disparity between our actual and potential personal conditions!

  4. Irene
    Irene says:

    It’s high time to stop parroting those naive platitutes about Eastern Europe being white havens. The West has been, continues to be inundaded with them simply bc the Easterners are fleeing their backward, incredibly corrupt and disfunctional societies.
    The open borders EU is killing the West!

      • Sophie Johnson
        Sophie Johnson says:

        It would be appropriate to explain your ‘true’, Dr Sunic. Do you really think that Eastern Europeans are doing something like ‘fleeing’ their undesirable countries? If you do, then you are just plain wrong. The simple fact is that they have come to work in Western EU countries because the post-commie oligarchs of their own countries had stolen public assets and traitorously sold them to non-national interests, at profit only to themselves, then profoundly indebted the national economies to the IMF, and to any number of predatory Western banks. That is why those Eastern European countries’ economies failed. Their young citizens who come to work in the West are doing it for the purely pragmatic reason of their economic survival, which will, with their return home, feed back into their native lands to help the recovering economies there. And those economies are recovering – slowly, of course, because their establishments remain largely post-commie and Jewish, and as yet impossible to move.

        Also, how many Eastern Europeans do you know who have decided to remain in the West permanently, having found there societies that are much to be preferred to their own? I suppose there might be some such cases. But in the main, they are young people feathering their nests back home, where they intend to return asap. (The exceptions, of course, are the Eastern European Gipsies. They are welfare scroungers in foreign lands no less that back home. But that is another story.)

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        I suspect that you are not aware, Dr. Sunic, that your comment here might be seen as lending support to one of the most actively divisive participants on TOO’s comment threads. Note especially that she has made the various Slav peoples a target of choice. As to the European Union, surely the assertion that the EU stands as a grave danger to the West is roughly as newsworthy as saying that vulcanization of rubber turned out to be pretty useful in the development of tires for trucks and cars.

        If Irene isn’t one of the sayanim, the entire category ought simply to be dismissed as a paranoid fiction. The fact that like a broken clock she’s right twice a day shouldn’t be permitted to carry undue weight.

    • Franklin Ryckaert
      Franklin Ryckaert says:

      Eastern Europe is not “third world”, it is second world and Eastern Europeans are all white. Most of them will fit in with us in due time. I had rather be “inundated” by them than by Arabs or Africans.

    • Rob Bottom
      Rob Bottom says:

      Irene, I think you’d do well to examine American, Canadian, and Australian history. It may take two or three generations, but those Eastern Europeans you seem to hate will eventually make excellent Western Europeans. Not that I’m in favor of mixing Europe, but it really is the immigration issue of least concern.

      • Carolyn Yeager
        Carolyn Yeager says:

        “Not that I’m in favor of mixing Europe …”

        Yes, Rob Bottom, you are in favor of mixing Europe when you say those EE’s will eventually make excellent WE’s. What else can you call that? All you’re saying is that mixing with blacks is worse. That’s a given, but it doesn’t make the first desirable.

        • Franklin Ryckaert
          Franklin Ryckaert says:

          Obviously he means mixing of Europeans in the European Diaspora (North America, Australia, New Zealand and also parts of Latin America). In the US this mixing is furthest proceeded. Most white Americans are “Euro-mutts”. With people like Lana Lokteff, who is of Russian descent, who would object to accept such people into the bargain ? European countries are another thing. They should try to keep not only their racial identity but also their ethnic identity, though mixing with other Europeans on a small scale is not disastrous.

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            I live in North America, you don’t, so you don’t know what’s good for North America. “Most” Americans are not mutts, as a matter of fact and being of related German and English or Scottish ancestry, which very many are, does not make one a mutt. But mixing much more different ethnicities, such as slavic or mediterranean (whom I like) with northern european can and maybe does. Mixing different peoples is not a good idea anywhere. I do not want my family, which has stayed quite German somehow, thankfully, through four generations now, to mix with Russian Lana Lokteff, if you really want to know. [My sister’s beautiful daughter (all German) married an Estonian (maybe a Baltic German?) and they produced twin boys who are 6’6″ tall and the most magnificent specimens you would ever hope to see. Perfect for the SS.] You, Franklin, are not the best decider of all things.

          • Franklin Ryckaert
            Franklin Ryckaert says:

            I’m not “deciding” anything, but most American white nationalists one meets on Internet fora say they are of mixed European descent. Irish-German but also Irish-Italian combinations seem very common. Tanstaafl himself is part Sicilian, remember ? As for “perfect material for the SS” (of all things), I had rather have someone looking like Lana Lokteff than Mongolian-looking Himmler :,_Heinrich_Himmler.jpg

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            Clearly, you spend all your time on Internet fora and Wikipedia and that is the extent of your knowledge and experience. The Irish must like it there too, if you are any judge. But people of higher quality do not hang out where you do.
            There is no purpose, therefore, in my debating with you any longer, so I shall have to ignore you.

          • Franklin Ryckaert
            Franklin Ryckaert says:

            @ Carolyn Yeager

            Your own “activity” is likewise only on the Internet, which you yourself have admitted in an interview. Nothing wrong with that, because the Internet is a splendid means to acquire and spread information.

            Since your admiration for Hitler is not rational but more like a “cult”, here is a youth portrait of your Hero, in which he looks even more Mongolian than Himmler :

      • GeorgeKocan
        GeorgeKocan says:

        The animosity against Eastern Europeans, especially Polish people has a source and a history. Danusha Goska, in her book, “Bieganski: the Brute Polish Stereotype…” she traces the current war on Poles to the Jewish people who settled in Poland around the 14th Century, when no other European state would have them. Jews self-consciously adopted a cultural strategy of occupying middle-class professions, such as lawyer, physicians, etc. They viewed lower kinds of jobs with scorn. They included fellow Jews in their attitude, thus, creating pressure on them to either conform or leave. This resulted on the one had in attaching themselves to the aristocracy and enjoying their favors and rewards and on the other despising Polish peasants and exploiting them. This tradition carried on into the Jewish influence on Communism. Poles resisted Communism from the beginning, having attacked Russia after WWII and liberating its eastern territories. During WWII the Polish government in exile warned the Allies repeatedly not to trust Stalin and the Russians–to no avail. The commies responded with a propaganda campaign demeaning Poles which both Churchill and FDR joined. They suppressed the Communist role in the Katyn Massacre. They played down the heroic efforts of Poles in the Kosciuszko squadron to protect the airspace over London from German socialists attack. After WWII the commie propaganda machine blamed Poles for pogroms which commies themselves began to scare Jews out of Poland and other Eastern European countries so that they would settle in Israel. Before WWI, Poles immigrated to the US in great numbers. They settled in places such as Chicago, where I grew up. By we moved there as refugees from war-torn Europe, the Poles had created a vibrant community. They build churches, beautiful, stunning examples of baroque architecture, all paid for by “peasants” working blue-collar type jobs. These peasants organized schools, elementary and high schools, which competed and out-paced the public schools created by the native WASPs (and maybe Irish). They organized and built hospitals, among them St. Mary of Nazareth, where my brother was born. They organized newspapers, radio programs, art and literary clubs, sports clubs and a Polish language library. Polish peasants also organized a college but not in the neighborhood, known as “Polonia,” but in Michigan. All this garnered little attention from the verbalist classes. Nelson Algren, a Swede of Jewish extraction, wrote about that neighborhood but ignored the vibrancy and creativity of the community and focused on the criminal element. One of his most famous stories concerned a rehabilitated heroin addict who was seduced into falling back into addiction, “The Man with the Golden Arm.” Polish peasants again provoked the ire of commies and their allies around the world by defying their masters in the form of the Solidarity Movement under the leadership of Lech Walesa. And most recently, defied the socio-fascists that run Europe by refusing to admit Muslims. This is the kind of hostile atmosphere Pole live in today.

      • Sophie Johnson
        Sophie Johnson says:

        ‘Not that I’m in favor of mixing Europe’: Rob Bottom, I’m a little surprised that you and others appear to take seriously the feasibility of ‘mixing Europe’. If that were feasible, we would long have been looking alike, speaking alike, writing alike, etc. Yet we retain very distinct tribal/territorial/cultural characterisitics. Indeed, the sheer diversity of Europeans is one of Europe’s many beauties. Being Europeans, we really have little, if any, taste for the ‘melting pot’.

  5. Sophie Johnson
    Sophie Johnson says:

    Oh, well done and a million thanks, Mr Langdon! This piece is hard-hitting, unfailingly deft, incontrovertibly well argued and clearly documented. It should give a moment or two of pause even to those overgrown children, the intellectually deprived crew of PC journalist who sicken us tirelessly with their shabby, down-at-heal ‘race’ cliches. (I say ‘should give’, knowing that it probably won’t, for nothing can penetrate the armour of self-righteous stupor so proudly brandished by the many PC imbeciles who pass as journalists these days.)

  6. Tom Sunic
    Tom Sunic says:

    Racism is not a privilege of Whites. “Non-Whites” is a misnomer—not signifying a homogenous racial group, other than their common resentment/ hatred/envy of Whites. If/when Whites shortly become a minority, the real urban warfare among non-Whites will start for good, possibly by then with each non-White praying for the return of his much-maligned White master-blaster. Hispanics do not like Blacks. Neither do East Asians like Blacks and Southeast Asians. Arab North Africans resent sub-Saharan Blacks. Check US campuses after happy hour of multikulti mimicry– each tribe thereafter preferring own separateness. Those of you/us who lived long enough in Asia and Africa know the name of the game. The msm never report on serious interracial brawls among non-White migrants in the EU. The big Chaos is on our Doorstep.

    • Leon Haller
      Leon Haller says:

      But the only issue is White preservation racially, and particular European ethnocultural recrudescence(s). THE issues are STILL the same (ie, since I used to read Instauration in the 80s): ending nonwhite immigration; deporting illegal aliens from the New World, and eventually ALL nonwhites from Europe; defending White interests in multiracialized nations; and massive White education as to a) the reality of gene-based racial differences; b) the legal oppression/disadvantaging of Whites; c) the ethics of White survivalism; and d) political and social strategies for achieving the above.

  7. Ger Tzedek
    Ger Tzedek says:

    So disturbing. One at a time these Jews demote Whites, one at a time promote all the others. There are left no Jews to promote, all are in positions beyond what they can handle, let alone deserve.

  8. Deep North
    Deep North says:

    It was bad enough that poorer whites are exposed to black criminality and dysfunction as well as having black ghetto culture rub off on them. Now educated professional whites are being taught to hate themselves. The concept of white privilege is another way to shame whites. After observing a Faceberg scuffle between some people over white privilege, I have taken some notes.

    It’s useless to say you have black friends, I don’t see race or I grew up poor. They see us as the majority people who created this country, so it doesn’t matter if you’re a poor white or a white liberal. We’re all guilty of micro-aggressing against minorities and our white privilege prevents us from seeing that. Call them out! Why should whites feel guilty about being a majority in a country founded by whites? I couldn’t help the fact that I was born white, why should I apologize to minorities?

    • Franklin Ryckaert
      Franklin Ryckaert says:

      Yes, it is not only “bad” for the West, if it continues it will mean the end of the West, and that is exactly the aim of (((those))) behind it.

      • Carolyn Yeager
        Carolyn Yeager says:

        “exactly the aim of (((those))) behind it.”

        You use those parentheses and yet you charge like Robin Hood to the defense of (((these people))) at the hands of those you call the Nazis. The Allies and Jews were in cahoots in WWII in support of the Global Order, Jewish usury and banking control. The Global Order is what is behind the “end of the West.” So just who is the real enemy to your confused mind? Please explain yourself for once.

        • Franklin Ryckaert
          Franklin Ryckaert says:

          The real enemy are (((those people))), but they are still human and not all of them are equally guilty. So a humane solution had to be found, likewise for all other human problems. That meant an orderly and humane repatriation to their own country and not deportations to concentration camps, packed in overcrowded cattle cars of trains, without food or water and only a bucket for a toilet as your much admired Nazis did. Until a final destination for the Jews could be found, only those in positions of power (i.e. finance, politics and media) could be removed from those positions while the rest could be left alone. I don’t see how a little Jewish shopkeeper could harm the nation.
          What you call a “confused mind” is simply moral consciousness, which you like your hero Adolf refuse to accept.

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            @ Franklin
            Yes, you are confused. Your arguments make no sense and do not follow the facts.
            First – As I have already pointed out, it is disastrous to think you can pick and choose among an enemy group that is as cohesive as the Jews as to which are more and less dangerous.
            Second – you are repeating Jewish lies about traveling without food or water and a bucket for a toilet. I can go into this in more detail if you ask for it, but this is not the place.
            Third – The Reich began with only removing Jews from positions of power and helping them resettle in Palestine, but slowly had to remove more and more because “little Jewish shopkeepers” did indeed carry out treasonous activities. There was a tremendous amount of anti-war treason going on, headquartered in Berlin where most Jews lived.
            Fourth – Your ‘moral consciousness’ conflicts with your naming of the Jew as the source of genocide of Europeans. You are unable to take an honest stand and actually DO ANYTHING. In other words, you will attack anyone who actually does something about the Jews. Asking them nicely to leave doesn’t work.
            Fifth – If this is your best explanation for your anti-Hitler stance, it’s not only weak, it’s false.

  9. Trenchant
    Trenchant says:

    Valid points all, except that Manchester appears a Deep State, MSM joint venture, with Muslims as patsies, much like 7/7. If jihadists-gone-wild! weren’t so heavily impressed on Joe Blogg’s mind, he wouldn’t be quite so keen to give up his civil liberties in return for Big Brother’s care. Bottled-up anti-Islamic sentiment (rational and justified for a myriad of other reasons) is useful when wars for Israel require British participation.

    It’s a clever and effective strategy.

  10. Ger Tzedek
    Ger Tzedek says:

    Also, Jordan Peterson has gone mad now. He advocates against identity politics. In game theory this is the trivial prisoner’s dilemma. If I and you both don’t talk, we both get one year in jail. If I don’t talk and you do, you walk free and I get three years in jail. If we both talk, we get two years in jail each. Should I talk? Well, prisoner’s dilemma assumes that I don’t know your intentions, and what you are doing. Here Whites know what everybody else is doing: identity politics. Only Whites are not doing it, only Whites are going extinct.

    • Curmudgeon
      Curmudgeon says:

      Jordan Peterson is a Libertarian. Libertarians believe in individualism for everything, and groups for nothing. They want no government regulation on anything, and reduce everything to economic transactions. Libertarians are, in essence, slow-motion anarchists.
      I do not necessarily agree with his position on identity politics, but he is useful in drawing attention to it, and by extension how warped our political system has become because of it.
      I gave up my membership in a political party, and flat out told them that by adopting identity politics, they were shunning their core supporters, which would lead to their becoming irrelevant. They are well on the way to doing so.

      • T. J.
        T. J. says:

        Aren’t you the creature who made an appalling remark about a certain part of my anatomy? Several years ago. Yes you are. As a socialist you have great difficulty with facts, as demonstrated by your anti-Libertarian comments.

        The Libertarian Case AGAINST Open Borders – Liberty Hangout

        Open Borders Are Anti-Libertarian – LewRockwell

        Real Libertarians Are Against Open Borders – Liberty Machine News

        A Libertarian Argument Against Opening Borders | Mises Institute

        What is the libertarian case against open borders? – Quora

        Libertarianism: why do so many libertarians oppose open borders

        The Libertarian Case AGAINST Open Borders – Altar & Throne

        Libertarian arguments against open – John Hospers

        • Sophie Johnson
          Sophie Johnson says:

          Yes, well … Mr Hoppe’s are the sane observations of the ‘man in the street’ kind – no more nor less. The extraordinary thing (to my ear) is that it comes from a German who is a known figure in public life: the others are quite religiously egalitarian/PC/commie.

    • Rob Bottom
      Rob Bottom says:

      Ger, Peterson has always advocated against identity politics. He regularly uses examples from the Soviet and Nazi era to demonstrate the very worst outcomes of identity politics. In this respect he is rebelling against the norm on college campuses, which are thronged with Judeo-Marxists who hold that whiteness itself is oppression, and categorize students into hierarchies of oppressed minorities.

      Recently it has come to light that Peterson is a frothing at the mouth philosemite who spoke at an event entitled “Canadians for Balfour 100”, where he repeatedly argued that antisemitism is rooted in jealousy of Jewish success, as is any criticism of Israel!

      • Ger Tzedek
        Ger Tzedek says:

        I don’t care about “Canadians for Balfour 100”. I think that the creation of Israel was a very good thing for the White man. Some people play theatre by joining events like this. I play theatre to get myself through a lot of stuff.

        There are many threads leading to WW1. One of them is that Jews killed Jean Jaurès, French socialist and pacifist, powerful in French politics, because he was in a position to stop war in 1912, and again in 1914. They equally killed or sidelined other people in other countries before the continuous revolution could begin. In a twist of events, one of the happiest events in human history is that Stalin won over Trotsky and somehow reigned Jews in. It is impossible to actually tell whether this was ultimately good. Would Hitler have won over Trotsky? I have an impression that Trotsky would have won over Hitler, so it was good that Stalin won over Trotsky.

        There were too many reasons for WW1, one seems to have been particularly nefarious. The Balfour Declaration itself. Jews made the events flow in such a way that the war would explode, Britain would see itself in dire straights, Balfour Declaration would ensue, Britain would win war. In fact, even with the help of Weizmann and Trotsky, Britain was sorely losing. German workers broke into protest, this halted the German war machine, Germany lost. Germany didn’t lose in the battlefield.

        I wish Stalin had let Jews emigrate en masse early on, after WW2. This would have solved the Jewish Problem in Eastern Europe much earlier and better. Jews stayed behind and intermarried en masse. This only complicated their assimilation for a few more generations. Had all Jews left eastern Europe, all history would have been better. Chances are, they would have had West collapse sooner, and with a very favorable demographic composition. Things wouldn’t have gone their way so majestically.

        • Karen T
          Karen T says:

          If all of the influential Jews in the West, busily destroying it, would only emigrate to Israel and like a civilized people mind their own business, rather than drain blood and money from the West, then yes, I agree, it could have been a good thing, but I suspect that their goals run much deeper.

          • Ger Tzedek
            Ger Tzedek says:

            No, no. Their goals run deeper, but they have not always attained their goals. They know this. They are not happy with their > 60% intermarriage rate. Or with the assimilation of their youth. This could have played a role in their rush to flood us fast while they can. Their sociopathetic character played certainly role, as seen by the confidence of Barbara Lerner Spectre.

  11. Ger Tzedek
    Ger Tzedek says:

    Every little helps. My idea is, let’s lock all Black women (and men) in school for as long as possible. Israel does the same, among other things. This brings down their fertility. To the graduated Blacks, tell them that they would be kangz in Africa. In a bunch of countries, their degrees, and their fairer looks would get them high places in the society, and plenty of potential mates.

  12. Vehmgericht
    Vehmgericht says:

    Afua Hirsch’s suffering in the dystopia that is contemporary London has reached such a pitch that she has had enough of white people who will not acknowledge that they are oppressing her.

    One simply cannot imagine any other ethnic group being scolded in this manner from the pages of the Guardian!

    • ilena
      ilena says:

      free speech is great, but at some point, enough is enough. Afua would not get away with that kind of Subversive article if she were in many nations of the world.
      People need bombard her with email over the article. We can’t be aggressive like her, as it would only be used against whites. A better way is to use super Passive Aggressiveness with her. Sometimes Passive-aggressive can be much better than aggression.
      So, one could write someone like Afua a nicey-nice email letter letting her know how subversion is considered a crime in many places and could be considered treason with very harsh consequences. Let her know that her article strikes a cord of racism against indigenous white Brits, but that in a way we can be thankful for her article as it is helping more and more whites begin organizing.
      Anyway, that is the kind of letter I will email her….of course with caution regarding your ip address.
      These people have no qualms about getting someone fired over the most pathetic things and will take any type of response to their garbage, as their usual victim self.

      • Sophie Johnson
        Sophie Johnson says:

        ‘Let her know that her article strikes a cord of racism against indigenous white Brits’. Let her know also that she looks unmistakably Jewish, so her appropriating of the ‘Black’ identity is rather forced, and probably not acceptable to real Blacks. And perhaps ask her if the UK Jewish community is, to her mind, more ‘race blind’ than the rest of us. That might well be the Brit-ish context that is her own and lets her experience the ‘part of’-ness that she craves? Also, put it to her, very gently, that her suffering amid White Brits might be a good argument against miscegenation. |In short, leave her spluttering.

      • Ger Tzedek
        Ger Tzedek says:

        We need to max out publicity for silly people like Afua. Long life to free-range speech! She is our very own useful idiot, as is Barbara Lerner Spectre. That I am here, you owe it to Barbara Lerner Spectre.

        • Vehmgericht
          Vehmgericht says:

          Under tutilege of Katherine Viner — a typical ‘tribal’ insider whose leonine visage and wise eyes can be found staring out of the Guardian website on most days, the anti-white coverage has definitely ramped up.

          For example today we have a bit on why straight white males were too villainous to be allowed to attend a Labour Party youth rally.

          That is par for the course. More extraordinary is Aararthi Prasad’s epiphany upon a questionable reconstruction of a mesolithic skull dug up South West England. Defying the laws of biochemistry that make our Island’s clouded skies and pallid sunlight problematic, in terms of Vitamin D production, for darker types such as Mr Prasad the reconstruction has been given a deep chocolate complexion. Mr Prasad tells goes on to tell us that he is heartened and relieved to discover the indigenous inhabitants of the the British Isles have never really been ‘white’. Of course any subsequent reconstruction of the skull reverting to a more typical NW-European adapted skin tone will not be reported, whereas Prasad’s angle will be doubtless touted on the BBC and possibly even go on to be taught in schools.

  13. Luke
    Luke says:

    This is a great article.

    I had never considered the angle that Mr. Langdon mentions, about how the hyper-aggressiveness and extreme obnoxiousness of black women being possibly related to their frustration over being on the losing end of competition for the men of their own race, but that idea does seem to have a considerable degree of logic to it.

    Looking back over the last few decades, I can remember a short period in the late 60s and early 70s – where there was an attempt by a number of celebrity black females to set a trend whereby black women were encouraged to let their kinky hair grow naturally and turn into Afros, as opposed to the cuckish habit most black women had of getting their hair straightened so it would look more like the hair of White females. This trend didn’t last long, and I have wondered why it faded out so fast.

    Young black girls can’t wait to get rid themselves of their naturally kinky hair and I see young black girls who haven’t even hit their teenage years yet – and they’ve already gone through the hair straightening ritual. It has to boil down to their insecurities with regards to competing for men.

    They apparently recognize that White females with their straight, beautiful hair are far more attractive and so, in a feeble attempt to try to compete with them – black girls try to make their hair look more like a White girl’s hair. Somewhere in this maze of racial confusion and competition – has arisen a faction of black women who adopt the dred-locks and corn-row look, and then there is the new fad of getting one of these ‘weave’ jobs added to the heads of black females.

    All of these things just serve to underline what a terrible mistake it was for our ancestors to have ever brought Africans into America. They clearly do feel comfortable living within a civilization and society created by Whites, and meant to reflect the standards of White Europeans.

    This is probably the primary reason why there are so many dysfunctional, pathological basket cases inside the black portion of our population. They are subconsciously aware that they do not really fit in – at least not naturally, and as a result have to work harder to adjust to White European cultural standards if they hope to be successful.

    And, most probably resent that pressure.

    • Ger Tzedek
      Ger Tzedek says:

      Jews played a disproportionate role in the slave trade. You cannot judge mistakes with the benefit of three or more centuries of hindsight. By this standard, everything is a mistake. There was a “back to Africa” movement that founded Liberia. Was supposed to absorb all African Americans. Jews sabotaged that. Today Liberia is run by 5% of the population, the descendants of returned slaves. This is a model that we must tell to Blacks actually: you would be kangz.

      There are very simple arrangements that can be done here now, and we all live “happily thereafter”. Jews sabotage that. (((Wesley Clark))) dares say it aloud: “there will remain no neighborhood un-diversified.” Obama says it too.

    • David Ashton
      David Ashton says:

      One can feel a certain sympathy for black women who are rejected by their men for white or light-skin girls, who are abandoned anyway to bring up the offspring on their own, and who are depressed when they look in the mirror. This will not be remedied by the use of “black” models with “Caucasian” facial structures, although flared nostrils, wide eyes and large lips have a universal sexual appeal to men. Each to his own is the best policy in both short and long term.

  14. David Ashton
    David Ashton says:

    Can you face and ever watch “black music videos”?

    One I recall had this near-nude “white babe” Shakira actually writhing seductively and provocatively in front of what looked like a group of male African villagers of all ages. What was the point of this?

  15. pfbonney
    pfbonney says:

    The unmentioned fact in the article is that “Britain’s most powerful elite” is disproportionately Jewish.

    – Article

    I sure wish that he had specified “progressive Jewish”, which would be significantly more accurate, as conservative Jews such as David Horowitz Freedom Center’sDavid Horowitz fights against such nonsense on a daily basis.

    • Chris
      Chris says:

      True. I think some people tend to exaggerate the role of Jews in the left wing. I mean, I get it – Jews tend to be far more liberal than right wing, and they play a significant role in left wing politics. But I think the left wing would still be extremely powerful without Jews involved. Every day I hear liberal idiots in the media, most of them gentiles.

  16. HK Wills
    HK Wills says:

    ” A fractured society is an enfeebled society” – a model of concision. Such a society is easier to dominate and manipulate. Being only about 2% of the population they are always in search of ways to compensate for this weakness: if they cannot be outvoted then capture their minds, and with them their beliefs, so that they vote with you. If the facts do not support you change them – or at least the public perception of them. Exploit their inattention to incrementally advance public policy changes to benefit you. Capture or dominate the most prestigious institutions so that the self serving pronouncements from them carry more weight and, by implication, the views of the smartest. Inject political content in apparently nonpolitical entertainment. Take the long view for Rome was not built in a day.

  17. Malc
    Malc says:

    What a superb essay. Absolute insight, undeniable truth, and many thanks for shaming the hypocritical Guardian “anti racist” fantasy merchants. Bravo!!!

  18. James Clayton
    James Clayton says:

    This is a simple, articulate transcript of a chapter of Robert S, Griffin’s biography of Dr. WIlliam Pierce, on exactly this subject, with a link to the ~20 minute audio version read by Vanessa Neubauer.

  19. DH
    DH says:

    It is about time that the anglos prove what they are made of. Muh “greatest generation” and assorted Churchill b.s. do not count.
    Can they produce some Elizabeth and Ferdinand? Or will they go down with a wimp after being (((their))) useful idiots for so long?

Comments are closed.