Jewish “Anti-Semitism”

Some of the worst atrocities committed against Jews were by other Jews. In particular the Jewish power elite have inflicted heinous violence and death on the Jewish masses, though other infighting and control dramas amounting to pogroms and terrorism are part of Jewish history as well. By no means exhaustive, we will review just some of the “anti-semitism” Jews have committed against their own kind.

The Levite Priests

When the ancient Hebrew patriarch Moses descended from Mt. Sinai, having received the Ten Commandments from the Hebrew tribal god Yahweh, he found his people straying from their faith and worshipping a golden calf under the leadership of Aaron. Such idolatry was not permitted by Yahweh, and Moses was commanded to enact vengeance on the idolators.

Those who were faithful among the Hebrews gathered with Moses and received their instructions. They took up swords and spears and went among the wayward people, slaughtering men, women and children. They even murdered some of their own immediate family members and close clan kin.  3,000 blasphemous Hebrews were slaughtered. These were the Levis, Moses’ own clan, especially zealous vengeful slaughterers.

Afterward, Yahweh through Moses rewarded the Levis for their faith and devotion in carrying out Yahweh’s vengeance, and bestowed on them a spiritual leadership over all the Hebrews. These became the Levite Priests. Their cruelty, deceit, blood-lust and terrorism over the Hebrews and others they encountered went on to become legend. Whether this story is itself legend or contains historical fact, it is undeniably a case of Jewish “anti-semitism”. 

Radicals vs. Moderates. Kevin MacDonald writes: 

Zionism is an example of an important principle in Jewish history: At all the turning points, it is the more ethnocentric elements—one might term them the radicals—who have determined the direction of the Jewish community and eventually won the day.3 As recounted in the Books of Ezra and Nehemiah, the Jews who returned to Israel after the Babylonian captivity energetically rid the community of those who had intermarried with the racially impure remnant left behind. Later, during the period of Greek dominance, there was a struggle between the pro-Greek assimilationists and the more committed Jews, who came to be known as Maccabeans.

At that time there appeared in Israel a group of renegade Jews, who incited the people. “Let us enter into a covenant with the Gentiles round about,” they said, “because disaster upon disaster has overtaken us since we segregated ourselves from them.”

The people thought this a good argument, and some of them in their enthusiasm went to the king and received authority to introduce non-Jewish laws and customs. They built a sports stadium in the gentile style in Jerusalem. They removed their marks of circumcision and repudiated the holy covenant. They intermarried with Gentiles, and abandoned themselves to evil ways.4 The victory of the Maccabeans reestablished Jewish law and put an end to assimilation.

 The Pharisees and Jesus

It’s hard to know whether this example is mythology or history, though devout Christians would insist it happened literally as described. Either way, Jewish “anti-Semitism” is deeply codified in the Christian religion.

If Jesus truly existed as an historical person, he was most likely a Jew, or more properly a Hebrew or Israelite, descended from King David. Jesus began his ministry at age 30, and it included deposing the ‘money changers’ from the temple, and challenging the authority of the Sanhderin council, a body of Hebrew or Israelite leaders that today we would call Jews. The ‘money changers‘ were certainly what we would call Jews as well.

The Sanhedrin council arranged for Jesus to be apprehended by the Romans. When the Romans gave the crowd—mostly Jews—the option to crucify Barabas or Jesus, Sanhedrin agents in the crowd incited it to condemn Jesus, and so he was crucified and apparently killed by the Romans. This is one of the more flagrant cases of Jewish “anti-semitism”, since certain Jews—the powerful Sanhedrin—oversaw the brutal torture and execution of another Jew, Jesus the Nazarene. Whether this is mythological, historical or some combination is irrelevant to our theme: Jew-on-Jew hate.

Jacob Frank

This son of a Rabbi was one of the most depraved madmen of all time. He declared himself the reincarnation of the Jewish Messiah, and many other Jews were willing to recognize this and follow him. Frank interpreted a verse from the Talmud to mean that if all Jews were to become sinners, the prophecy of the Jewish paradise on Earth would ensue.  Talmud Sanhedrin 98a states “The Son of David (Jewish Messiah) will come only in a generation that is entirely innocent… or in a generation that is entirely guilty…”So Jacob Frank set about enacting evil in the most grotesque ways, engaging in incest, sodomy, polygamy, orgiastic rituals, providing his own wife (or both of them) to his followers for sexual sport, and other depravities in order to create the entirely guilty generation.


We have two different accounts of the story from there. One says his perversion and depravity became known to other local Jews, and they excommunicated him and his followers, banishing them from the Polish town. One reason they did this was because the Frankists were burning Talmuds and accusing the other Jews of blood libel, conducting occult rituals by torturing children to death and drinking the blood and anointing their bodies with it.  Another account says that after their excommunication, the Frankists sought refuge with the Catholic Church. In exchange, the Church required the Frankists to denounce their fellow Jews by burning their Talmuds and accusing them of blood libel. Either way, this was a case of vicious Jewish in-fighting. Jewish “anti-semitism” was inflicted in both directions. 

The SS Patria

On November 25, 1940, the SS Patria, a passenger ship operated by the British was prepared to leave Haifa harbor in Palestine enroute to Mauritius. Too many Jewish “refugees” from the beginning of World War II in Europe were coming to Palestine illegally, and the British were trying to prevent Arab unrest due to excessive Jewish illegal immigration into Palestine. The Rothschild bankers and other Jewish Zionist zealots at the time were eager to place more Jewish residents in Palestine in preparation for declaring their new state of Israel. Zionists had even arranged a deportation plan with the National Socialist government of Germany called the Haavara or Transfer Agreement, where Germany could rid itself of troublesome Jews in an orderly fashion, and Zionists could increase their stocking of Palestine with Jews.

However, the British refused to allow the up to 1800 Jewish “refugees” on the Patria to stay in Palestine. but before it could depart for Mauritius, a bomb exploded at the water line, blowing a six-meter hole in the hull and sinking the Patria in the shallow port. About 270 passengers were killed, mostly Jews though including around 50 British crew members.

At first authorities and media blamed Arabs for the bombing, then later declared that the passengers themselves detonated the bomb, so committed were they as Jews to remain in Palestine that they would risk their own lives rather than let the British deport them. Much later, in 1957, the man who actually placed the bomb, Munya Mardor, wrote a confession of his crime, claiming that there was no intention to sink the ship, only to disable it. But obviously, the project entailed severe risks to other Jews that he, as a member of the Zionist terrorist organization Haganah, was willing to take. It also emerged that another Jewish terror group, the Irgun, had tried to place a bomb a few days prior, but failed. Irgun became today’s Likud party in Israel. Mardor eventually became the director general of the Israel Weapons Research and Development Authority. Jewish terrorists and mass murderers are promoted for their service.

Mardor’s Haganah officer in charge was Yitzak Sadeh, who was in turn under the command of the Jewish Agency’s Political Department head Moshe Sharett. Sharett went on to become Israel’s second Prime Minister after David Ben Gurion, who was the official head of the Jewish Agency at the time, but was away in the US on other terrorist business.[1]

This act left hundreds of Jews dead at the hands of other Jews. The death of innocent British crew members doesn’t factor into the analysis. The placement of European Jews into Palestine was a fundamentalist goal of Zionist Jews, and the deaths of hundreds of other Jews was an acceptable sacrifice to ensure it.

Rabinnical “Anti-Semitism”

A great deal can be written on the brutality and cruelty Jewish Rabbis have inflicted on their own Jewish populations, mainly in order to control them, including strict isolation from other liberating influences. Here we will take only a few examples from the iconic insider analysis by Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion, the Weight of 3000 Years:

In the period 1500-1795, one of the most superstition-ridden in the history of Judaism, Polish Jewry was the most superstitious and fanatic of all Jewish communities. The considerable power of the Jewish autonomy was used increasingly to stifle all original or innovative thought, (and) to promote the most shameless exploitation of the Jewish poor by the Jewish rich in alliance with the rabbis…[2]

The Jewish religion Judaism established from the beginning a totalitarian mind control over its adherents/victims resulting in subjection to Rabinnical authority:

According to (Rabbi) Hadas, a crucial feature of the Platonic political system, adopted by Judaism as early as the Maccabean period (142–63 BC), was ‘that every phase of human conduct be subject to religious sanctions which are in fact to be manipulated by the ruler’. Judaism adopted what ‘Plato himself summarized [as] the objectives of his program’, in the following well-known passage:”
‘The principle thing is that no one, man or woman, should ever be without an officer set over him, and that none should get the mental habit of taking any step, whether in earnest or in jest, on his individual responsibility. In peace as in war he must live always with his eyes on his superior officer. … In a word, we must train the mind not to even consider acting as an invidual or know how to do it. (Laws, 942 ab)’
If the word ‘rabbi’ is substituted for ‘an officer’ we will have a perfect image of classical Judaism. The latter is still deeply influencing Israeli-Jewish society and determining to a large extent the Israeli policies.[3]

Rabbis had been in the habit of killing Jews who departed from strict Talmudic doctrine. One wayward Jew was boiled alive in the public baths.

In the late 1830s a ‘Holy Rabbi’ (Tzadik ) in a small Jewish town in the Ukraine ordered the murder of a (Jewish) heretic by throwing him into the boiling water of the town baths.

Other Jews were poisoned to death by their Rabbis. Kevin MacDonald notes:

During 1848, when the (Austrian) regime’s power was temporarily weakened, the first thing the leaders of the Jewish community in the Galician city of Lemberg (now Lvov) did with their newly regained freedom was to poison the liberal rabbi of the city, whom the tiny non-Orthodox Jewish group in the city had imported from Germany.[4]

These groups were highly authoritarian—another fundamental feature of Jewish social organization.32 Rabbis and other elite members of the community had extraordinary power over other Jews in traditional societies—literally the power of life and death. Jews who informed the authorities about the illegal activities of other Jews were liquidated on orders of secret rabbinical courts, with no opportunity to defend themselves. Jews accused of heretical religious views were beaten or murdered. Their books were burned or buried in cemeteries. When a heretic died, his body was beaten by a special burial committee, placed in a cart filled with dung, and deposited outside the Jewish cemetery. In places where the authorities were lax, there were often pitched battles between different Jewish sects, often over trivial religious points such as what kind of shoes a person should wear. In 1838 the governor of southwestern Russia issued a directive that the police keep tabs on synagogues because “Very often something happens that leaves dead Jews in its wake.”33 Synagogues had jails near the entrance, and prisoners were physically abused by the congregation as they filed in for services.


Kevin MacDonald describes the basic dynamic of division within the Jewish community:

  • Zionism began among the more ethnocentric, committed segments of the Jewish community (1880s).
  • Then it spread and became mainstream within the Jewish community despite its riskiness (1940s). Supporting Zionism comes to define what being Jewish is.
  • Then the most extreme among the Zionists continued to push the envelop (e.g., the settlement movement on the West Bank; constant pressure on border areas in Israel).
  • Jewish radicalism tends to result in conflicts with non-Jews (e.g., the settlement movement); violence (e.g., Intifadas) and other expressions of anti-Jewish sentiment increase.
  • Jews in general feel threatened and close ranks against what they see as yet another violent, incomprehensible manifestation of the eternally violent hatred of Jews. This reaction is the result of psychological mechanisms of ethnocentrism: Moral particularism, self-deception, and social identity.
  • In the U.S., this effect is accentuated because committed, more intensely ethnocentric Jews dominate Jewish activist groups.
  • Jews who fail to go along with what is now a mainstream position are pushed out of the community, labeled “self-hating Jews” or worse, and relegated to impotence.

We have reviewed only some of the many acts of Jewish “anti-Semitism” in history. Certain Jews, mostly the ruling elite, have inflicted heinous death and torment on other Jews—a testament to their fanaticism, authoritarianism, and powerful sense of collectivism. The Jewish community has often been divided, with the more deeply committed, ethnocentric, and fanatical Jews forcing others to conform to their way of seeing things or separating themselves from the rest. And at all the major turning points in history, the radicals have won the day in conflict with their less ethnocentric brethren, quite likely leading to genetic selection for ethnocentrism within the Jewish community.

In general, in the last few centuries at least, the more ethnocentric White people in Western countries have not been victorious. The West is far more prone to individualism than any other culture area, but there is certainly variation among us for ethnocentrism, although we have not been under centuries of selection for ethnocentrism, as have the Jews. Quite the opposite. But the bottom line is that the Zionists were successful, and we have to think about what that means for us. Israel would not have become a state without a great many deeply ethnocentric Jews willing to engage in any means necessary to bring about their dream: a state that would be a vehicle for their ethnic interests. It would not have come about without the most radical among them—people like Vladimir Jabotinsky, Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Shamir, Ariel Sharon, and groups like Haganah and Irgun. And although there have been American Jews, especially in the early decades of the twentieth century, who vigorously rejected Zionism, the vast majority of the organized American Jewish community is now intensely Zionist and doing all they can to support Israel, even as it’s become obvious that Israel is an apartheid state energetically engaged in ethnic cleansing–while at the same time working to accuse the White majority of racism if they resist their dispossession.

The impending dispossession of Europeans will only be avoided if people with the same level of dedication and ethnocentrism as found over the centuries among Jews can be found among the political and activist class of Europeans. Just as the radical Jews have been willing to push their less radical brethren out of the Jewish community, we must be willing to do the same.


[1]     Ryan Dawson, “This day in History Jewish terrorists sank ship full of Jewish refugees”, November 26 2017, Anti NeoCon Report,

[2]     Ibid, p. 54

[3]     Ibid, p. 14

[4]     Ibid, p. 18

30 replies
  1. philip
    philip says:

    The following is an article written by an American Jew in 1928:
    By Marcus Eli Ravage
    Reprinted from The Century Magazine January 1928
    Of course, you do resent us. It is no good telling me you don’t. So let us not waste any time on denials and alibis. You know you do, and I know it, and we understand each other. To be sure, some of your best friends are Jews, and all that. I have heard that before once or twice, I think. And I know too, that you do not include me personally – “me” being any particular individual Jew – when you fling out at us in your wholesale fashion, because I am, well, so different, don’t you know, almost as good as one of yourselves. That little exemption does not, somehow, move me to gratitude; but never mind that now. It is the aggressive, climbing, pushing, materialistic sort you dislike – those, in a world, who remind you so much of your own up-and-coming brethren. We understand each other perfectly. I don’t hold it against you.
    Bless my soul; I do not blame anybody for disliking anybody. The thing that intrigues me about this anti-Jewish business, as you play at it, you make such fantastic and transparent excuses, you seem to be suffering from self-consciousness so horribly, that if the performance were not so grotesque it would be irritating.
    It is not as if you were amateurs: you have been at it for over fifteen centuries. Yet watching you and hearing your childish pretexts, one might get the impression that you did not know yourselves what it is all about. You resent us, but you cannot clearly say why. You think up a new excuse – a “reason” is what you call it – every other day. You have been piling up justification for yourself these many hundreds of years and each new invention is more laughable than the last and each new excuse contradicts and annihilates the last.
    Not so many years ago I used to hear that we were money-grubbers and commercial materialists; now the complaint is being whispered around that no art and no profession is safe against Jewish invasion.
    We are, if you are to be believed, at once clannish and exclusive, and unassimilable because we won’t intermarry with you, and we are also climbers and pushers and a menace to your racial integrity.
    Our standard of living is so low that we create your slums and sweat industries, and so high that we crowd you out of your best residential sections. We shirk our patriotic duty in wartime because we are pacifists by nature and tradition, and we are the arch-plotters of universal wars and the chief beneficiaries of those wars (see “The protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”.)
    We are at once the founders and leading adherents of capitalism and the chief perpetrators of the rebellion against capitalism.
    Surely, history has nothing like us for versatility!
    And oh!
    I almost forgot the reasons of reasons. We are the stiff-necked people who never accepted Christianity, and we are the criminal people who crucified its founder.
    But I tell you, you are self-deceivers.
    You lack either the self-knowledge or the mettle to face the facts squarely and own up to the truth. You resent the Jew not because, as some of you seem to think, we crucified Jesus but because we gave him birth. Your real quarrel with us is not that we have rejected Christianity but that we have imposed it upon you!
    Your loose, contradictory charges against us are not a patch on the blackness of our proved historic offence. You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit the charge.
    What of it?
    Compared with what Paul the Jew of Tarsus accomplished in Rome, the Russian upheavals a mere street brawl.
    You make much noise and fury about the undue Jewish influence in your theatres and movie palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well-founded. But what is that compared to our staggering influence in your churches, your schools, your laws and your governments, and the very thoughts you think every day?
    A clumsy Russian forges a set of papers and publishes them in a book called “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” which shows that we plotted to bring on the late World War. You believe that book. All right. For the sake of argument, we will underwrite every word of it. It is genuine and authentic. But what is that besides the unquestionable historical conspiracy which we have carried out, which we never have denied because you never had the courage to charge us with it, and of which the full record is extant for anybody to read?
    If you really are serious when you talk of Jewish plots, may I not direct your attention to one worth talking about? What use is it wasting words on the alleged control of your public opinion by Jewish financiers, newspaper owners, and movie magnates, when you might as well justly accuse us of the proved control of your whole civilization by the Jewish Gospels?
    You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt.
    We are intruders.
    We are disturbers.
    We are subverters.
    We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them.
    We have been at the bottom of not merely the latest Great War but of nearly all your wars, not only of the Russian but of nearly every other major revolution in your history.
    We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life.
    We are still doing it. No one can tell how long, we shall go on doing it.
    Look back a little and see what has happened. Nineteen hundred years ago you were an innocent, care-free pagan race. You worshipped countless Gods and Goddesses, the spirits of the air, of the running streams and of the woodland. You took unblushing pride in the glory of your naked bodies. You carved images of your gods and of the tantalizing human figure. You delighted in the combats of the field, the arena and the battle-ground. War and slavery were fixed institutions in your systems. Disporting yourselves on the hillsides and in the valleys of the great outdoors, you took to speculating on the wonder and mystery of life and laid the foundations of natural science and philosophy. Yours was a noble, sensual culture, unirked by the prickings of the social conscience or by any sentimental questionings about human equality. Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone.
    But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and pulled down the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the whole course of your history. We conquered you as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or Asia. And we did it all without bullets, without blood or turmoil, without force of any kind. We did it solely by the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda.
    We made you the willing and unconscious bearers of our mission to the whole world, to the barbarous races of the world, to the countless unborn generations. Without fully understanding what we were doing to you, you became the agents at large of our racial tradition, carrying our gospel to unexplored ends of the earth.
    Our tribal customs have become the core of your moral code. Our tribal laws have furnished the basic groundwork of all your august constitutions and legal systems. Our legends and our folk-tales are the sacred lore which you croon to your infants. Our poets have filled your hymnals and your prayer-books.
    Our national history has become an indispensable part of the learning of your pastors and priests and scholars. Our Kings, our statesmen, our prophets, our warriors are your heroes. Our ancient little country is your Holy Land. Our national literature is your Holy Bible. What our people thought and taught has become inextricable woven into your very speech and tradition, until no one among you can be called educated who is not familiar with our racial heritage.
    Jewish artisans and Jewish fishermen are your teachers and your saints, with countless statues carved in their image and innumerable cathedrals raised to their memories. A Jewish maiden is your ideal of motherhood and womanhood. A Jewish rebel-prophet is the central figure in your religious worship. We have pulled down your idols, cast aside your racial inheritance, and substituted for them our God and our traditions. No conquest in history can even remotely compare with this clean sweep of our conquest over you.
    How did we do it?
    Almost by accident.
    Nearly two thousand years ago in far-off Palestine, our religion had fallen into decay and materialism. Money-changers were in possession of the temple. Degenerate, selfish priests grew fat. Then a young patriot- idealist arose and went about the land calling for a revival of the faith. He had no thought of setting up a new church. Like all the prophets before him, his only aim was to purify and revitalize the old creed. He attacked the priests and drove the money- changers from the temple. This brought him into conflict with the established order and its supporting pillars. The Roman authorities, who were in occupation of the country, fearing his revolutionary agitation as a political effort to oust them, arrested him, tried him and condemned him to death by crucifixion, a common form of execution at that time. The followers of Jesus of Nazareth, mainly slaves and poor workmen, in their bereavement and disappointment, turned away from the world and formed themselves into a brotherhood of pacifists non-resisters, sharing their memory of their crucified leader and living together communistically. They were merely a new sect in Judea, without power or consequence, neither the first nor the last.
    Only after the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans did the new creed come into prominence. Then a patriotic Jew named Paul or Saul conceived the idea of humbling the Roman power by destroying the morale of its soldiery with the doctrines of love and non- resistance preached by the little sect of Jewish Christians. He became the Apostle to the Gentiles, he who hitherto had been one of the most active persecutors of the band. And so well did Paul do his work that within four centuries the great empire which had subjugated Palestine along with half of the world, was a heap of ruins. And the law which went forth from Zion became the official religion of Rome.
    This was the beginning of our dominance in your world. But it was only a beginning. From this time forth your history is little more than a struggle for mastery between your own old pagan spirit and our Jewish spirit. Half your wars, great and little, are religious wars, fought over the interpretation of one thing or another in our teachings. You no sooner broke free from your primitive religious simplicity and attempted the practice of the pagan Roman learning than Luther armed with our Gospel arose to down you and re-enthrone our heritage. Take the three principal revolutions in modern times – the French, the American, and the Russian. What are they but the triumphs of the Jewish idea of social, political and economic justice?
    And the end is still a long way off. We still dominate you. At this very moment your churches are torn asunder by a civil war between Fundamentalists and Modernists, that is to say between those who cling to our teachings and traditions literally and those who are striving by slow steps to dispossess us. Again and again the Puritan heritage of Judea breaks out in waves of stage censorship, Sunday blue laws and national prohibition acts. And while these things are happening you twaddle about Jewish influence in the movies.
    Is it any wonder you resent us?
    We have put a clog upon your progress. We have imposed upon you an alien book and an alien faith which you cannot digest, which is at cross-purposes with your native spirit, which keeps you everlasting ill-at-ease, and which you lack the spirit to either reject or accept in full.
    In full, of course, you never have accepted our Christian teachings. In your hearts you still are pagans. You still take pride in the glory of the nude human figure. Your social conscience, in spite of all democracy and all your social revolution, is still a pitifully imperfect thing. We have merely divided your soul; confused your impulses and paralysed your desires.
    In the midst of the battle you are obliged to kneel down to him who commanded you to turn the other cheek, who said “Resist not evil” and “Blessed are the peace-makers”.
    In your lust for gain you are suddenly disturbed by a memory from your Sunday school days about taking no thought for the morrow.
    In your industrial struggles, when you would smash a strike without compunction, you are suddenly reminded that the poor are blessed and that men are brothers in the Fatherhood of the Lord.
    And you are about to yield to temptation, your Jewish training puts a deterrent hand on your shoulder and dashes the brimming cup from your lips. You Christians have never become Christianized. To that extent we have failed with you. But we have forever spoiled the fun of paganism for you.
    So why should you not resent us?
    If we were in your place we should probably dislike you more cordially than you do us. But we should make no bones about telling you why.
    We should not resort to subterfuges and transparent pretext. With millions of painfully respectable Jewish shopkeepers all about us we should not insult your intelligence and your own honesty by talking about communism as a Jewish philosophy. And with millions hard-working impecunious Jewish peddlers and labourers we should make ourselves ridiculous by talking about international capitalism as a Jewish monopoly. No we should go straight to the point. We should contemplate this confused ineffectual muddle which we call civilization, this half- Christian half-pagan medley, and – we should say to you point- blank:
    “For this mess thanks to you, to your prophets, and your Bible.”

      • Oscar Wilson
        Oscar Wilson says:

        The Ravage and Samuels references are well known to “mavens” in basement-level antisemitica, along with Samuel Roth’s “Jews Must Live” (1934) and “Baruch Levi’s Letter to Marx” (nd?), not to mention many “quotes” from Gerald L. K. Smith, and so on and so forth (as “they” say).

        More seriously, in the real world, has been the gradual colonization of Jewish opinion and activity by Zionists, and then their colonization of American politics and diplomacy in turn. The experience of Jews in the US has been however been somewhat different from that of the UK, but the former community has had increasing influence on the latter, the Blair “shabbos goy” interregnum being the most glaring example, but recently exemplified by the demand of the Zionist ascendancy that the Labour Party should return to kashrut by kicking out its former leader Comrade Corbyn; see e.g. “The Times of Israel,” April 5, 2020/August 1, 2021, online.

        • TJ
          TJ says:

          The name is Samuel, Maurice Samuel.
          Two in a row got it wrong.

          Maybe Kant and Berkeley are right, the senses [eyes] are not reliable.

        • karl haemers
          karl haemers says:

          What could be more serious than Samuels? Or Levi’s letter to Marx (real name Moses Mordechai Levy. Family?) Perhaps the Protocols are not ‘serious’ either, though the effects are catastrophic.
          If Zionism is the only ‘serious’ Jewish threat, it is using similar methods as Samuels, Levi and the Protocols reveal.

          • Ned J. Casper
            Ned J. Casper says:

            The Baruch Levi letter sounds as fake as the Israel Cohen racial plan. These parodic versions of some Jewish activities are similar to the much larger “Protocols”.

            I had expected that this article would have engendered an informed discussion of (1) the Randlords and (2) Jewish support for the Communist and anti-apartheid agitation in South Africa, including the brief and semi-secret Afrikaner-Israel military collaboration.

            The half-back notion expressed here that the parasite will eventually kill its host resembles Hitler’s comment on the vampire, but it attributes to Jews a lack of intelligence and of foresight that contradicts their experience and ours.

          • karl haemers
            karl haemers says:

            Whether the Levi letter, the Cohen plan or the Protocols are ‘fake’ must be supported by evidence and analysis, not whether they ‘sound’ fake. It is likely they have another objective than the obvious, but this does not make them ‘fake’. That objective could include incitement of ‘anti-semitism’ and semitophobia, phenomena Power Jews have used before in history.
            And as many have pointed out, much in the real world is proceeding along the paths laid out by such ‘fake’ accounts.

    • Shafi
      Shafi says:

      Very well researched as usual.My humble advice please stop using holocust for gains,stop maiming non jews.Media,Hollywood,Publishing houses,Corporates Lobbysts,Influencers,Powerbrokers etc etc are mostly dominated by Jews nothing wrong they worked their way up but do please stop using all those to infiltrate the minds & thinking of most Americans, Europeans most surprisingly a great number of intellectuals & powerful people who ultimately influence the pro Israel policies of favourable Governments we know who they are ultimately fuelling never ending conflicts & disrupting order, ruining lives & economies & leaving scars those never heal.

      • karl haemers
        karl haemers says:

        I truly wanted to include the holocaust in the examples of Jewish “anti-semitism”, because this horror story has frightened and manipulated the Jewish people for 80 years. I suspected it would not be accepted however, so left it out.
        It is not ‘okay’ that Jews ‘worked their way up’ into positions of power, since they primarily used nepotism not competence to do so. And because their ambitions are nefarious not benign or even neutral.

  2. anonym
    anonym says:

    The early Zionists seems to have had nothing but contempt for a majority of the Jews. A couple of quotes from Gilad Atzmon´s “Being in Time”:

    This is how A.D. Gordon, the founder of Labour Zionism expressed his [contempt]: ” We are a parasitic people. We have no roots in the soil, there is no ground beneath our feet. And we are parasites not only in an economic sense but in spirit, in thought, in poetry, in literature, and in our virtues, our ideals, our higher Zionist aspirations.
    The Zionist Marxist youth magazine “hashomer hatzair”, stated in 1936: “The Jew is a caricature of a normal, natural human being both physically and spiritually, as an individual he revolts and throws off the harness of social obligations, knows no order nor discipline.”

    Miko Peled has a great article at Unz Review about it:

    At the bottom they hate themselves, but every time they try to improve themselves it leads to even more disastrous ideologies and events. Gnosticism, Christianity, Sabbateanism, reform judaism, usury capitalism, communism, libertarianism…
    By now most of them seems to have given up and shamelessly indulge in their Jewishness, they let their “freak flag fly”, “let it all hang out” and tries turn all of Europe and North America into a casino whorehouse.

  3. Gerry
    Gerry says:

    3 things of importance:

    The Levitical priesthood can be summed up best by Christs own words:

    “Be on your guard against the yeast of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy. Luke 12:1

    as for Dr. Kevin MacDonald point on intermarriage, “As recounted in the Books of Ezra and Nehemiah, the Jews who returned to Israel after the Babylonian captivity energetically rid the community of those who had intermarried with the racially impure remnant left behind,” the exact same sentiment is found in the New Testament and should be found in the Christian Church of today!!!:

    “Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?”

    The more things change the more they stay the same!!

    as for the blood lust of the Old Testament Jesus himself made it abundantly clear by way of:

    Then Jesus began to denounce the towns in which most of his miracles had been performed, because they did not repent. 21 “Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the miracles that were performed in you had been performed in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes. 22 But I tell you, it will be more bearable for Tyre and Sidon on the day of judgment than for you. 23 And you, Capernaum, will you be lifted to the heavens? No, you will go down to Hades.[e] For if the miracles that were performed in you had been performed in Sodom, it would have remained to this day. 24 But I tell you that it will be more bearable for Sodom on the day of judgment than for you.” Mathew 11:20-24

    There are those who always seem to want to get rid of the meta-physical and that is a great mistake! To ignore and indeed reject a God who is our true Father meaning parenthood and He what has no right to punish His children for disobedience is bizarre? Those days of old faith wasn’t a blind belief idea like it is today. Existence of God was a very real in your face matter and to ignore reject Him is a very deadly and severe matter. What would any of us do if our own children did to us what those people did to God blatant rebellion? Can you imagine a daughter or a son telling us hey guess what I want my friends parents to be my parents rather than the two of you because they give me everything I want so get lost Mom and Dad! You then learn later that the children I born into this world are into all kinds of despicable behavior and are causing others to follow them into the same kind of blatant rebellion and sin? What are you going to do have a beer? And Sodom in spite of not being the recipient of miracles they nevertheless knew full well of God’s existence. The story er history rather of Noah wasn’t for them a fable and neither was Abraham. They knew full well the details of their history and yet enjoyed the pleasures of sin to the point of even demanding the ‘knowing of the servants of the Lord who came to Lot’s door.’

    “How much more severely do you think someone deserves to be punished who has trampled the Son of God underfoot, who has treated as an unholy thing the blood of the covenant that sanctified them, and who has insulted the Spirit of grace?” Heb 10:29

    and viola 70 AD and then the earthquake of May 30, 363 AD proof yes of the meta-physical at work!!!

    The stones were piled high and ready. Costly wood had been purchased. The necessary metal was at hand. The Jews of Jerusalem were rejoicing. Tomorrow—May 20, 363 A.D.—the rebuilding of the Temple would begin! Suddenly, and without warning, at the third hour of the night… the streets of Jerusalem trembled and buckled, crushing two hundred years of hope in a pile of dust. No longer would there be any possibility of rebuilding the Temple.

    And the Bible tells us guess what another earthquake is coming but this time it will be global burying the entire world with islands all disappearing. Do you really want to gamble it all just fables or actual historical fact waiting to happen and if my suspicions are correct our children’s very future!

  4. Chris Moore
    Chris Moore says:

    “This son of a Rabbi was one of the most depraved madmen of all time. He declared himself the reincarnation of the Jewish Messiah, and many other Jews were willing to recognize this and follow him. Frank interpreted a verse from the Talmud to mean that if all Jews were to become sinners, the prophecy of the Jewish paradise on Earth would ensue. Talmud Sanhedrin 98a states “The Son of David (Jewish Messiah) will come only in a generation that is entirely innocent… or in a generation that is entirely guilty…”So Jacob Frank set about enacting evil in the most grotesque ways, engaging in incest, sodomy, polygamy, orgiastic rituals, providing his own wife (or both of them) to his followers for sexual sport, and other depravities in order to create the entirely guilty generation.”

    These are “Jewish” values of today. In fact, the Jewish prophets of the Bible would mostly be described as “anti-Semites” in this day and age. That’s because Judaism is no longer about morally upstanding behavior to ensure the survival of the nation, but rather about the Jewish crime rackets and international Zionist profits. “We’re bigger than US Steel, ((Hyman Roth)) told Michael Corleone in The Godfather. They’re now exponentially bigger than that, fully integrated into the Fortune 500.

    When did Judaism flip from the righteous prophets of the Bible to the self-righteous, hypocritical crime rackets of today? A Christian would argue it was when the Moneychangers instigated the crucifixion of Christ to protect their dirty deals with the Romans.

    But before that, Moses (the receiver of the Ten Commandments and founder of Judaism) shows that lazy, degenerate, treacherous, quick-buck Hebrew grifters have always walked among the tribe.

    “When the ancient Hebrew patriarch Moses descended from Mt. Sinai, having received the Ten Commandments from the Hebrew tribal god Yahweh, he found his people straying from their faith and worshipping a golden calf under the leadership of Aaron. Such idolatry was not permitted by Yahweh, and Moses was commanded to enact vengeance on the idolators.”

    Zionists might argue Israel is patrolling Judaism again, culling the unworthy. But how do they explain the “Jewish” rackets and crime operation (9/11 being the foremost example)? How do they explain their worship of the profits that pay for Israel, not Prophets? How do they explain their modern day golden calf-worshiping international bankers and the murderous Federal Reserve/Petrodollar world fiat currency agenda?

    The Talmud is the “holy” book of the Satanic Hebrews. That’s the only theological explanation that makes any sense. Jews in the image of the Prophets are long gone, murdered by the Satanic Hebrews, who have hijacked their moral authority to destroy the world for Satan.

    Anyone who calls themselves a “Christian” should stipulate this, and seek vengeance. But so many “Christians” of today are, like the Satanic Hebrews, hypocrites, moral frauds and collaborators of the worst kind.

    Like Fredo from ‘The Godfather,’ they’re the worst kind of Judas simps, creeps and cowards. And the Jew-stooge “secular liberals” are even worse.

    How long are we expected to take this Satanic ((Jew)) b.s. lying down? The Satanic Hebrew and his flying monkeys would reply: “Forever,” and laugh long and hard.

    • Philip
      Philip says:

      It must be seen and rejected as Jewish mind control at its most basic. It exists to confuse and disarm Gentiles and in its extreme forms to protect Jews. If it weren’t for Christianity and its passive, surrender-based nature, the Jews would not be around today to cause us so much trouble and expense and international bloodshed. The teachings of Jesus, whom the Jews pretend to hate, have kept the Jews alive and well.

      “And there arose not a prophet since in Israel like unto Moses”
      (Deuteronomy 34:10)
      Yahweh, a being of simple and bloody tastes

      “One night while Moses was in camp, Jehovah was about to kill him.
      But Zipporah [his wife] circumcised her son with a flint knife … So Yahweh did not harm Moses.
      Zipporah said, ‘You are a bridegroom of blood’.”
      – Exodus 4.24-26.

      NUMBERS 31:13-18:
      (13) Moses, Eleazar the priest, and all the leaders of the community went to meet them outside the camp.
      (14) But Moses was furious with all the generals and captains who had returned from the battle.
      (15) “Why have you let all the women live?” he demanded.
      (16) “These are the very ones who followed Balaam’s advice and caused the people of Israel to rebel against the Lord at Mount Peor. They are the ones who caused the plague to strike the Lord’s people.
      (17) So kill all the boys and all the women who have had intercourse with a man.
      ( 18 ) Only the young girls who are virgins may live; you may keep them for yourselves.

      “Do not think that I will accuse you before the Father. Your accuser is Moses, in whom you have put your hope. 46 If you had believed Moses, you would believe Me, because he wrote about Me. 47But since you do not believe what he wrote, how will you believe what I say?”…
      John 5:45 47

      For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.
      Matthew 5:18


      Judaism is morally bankrupt; it has nothing to offer us but out-dated plagiarized myths, about some angry judgmental god that is remarkably exactly like the Jews themselves. The anthropocentric supremacist myths of the Jews should have little appeal to a person of high consciousness; such exclusionistic ideas are an anathema to any decent human being. The idea that you need salvation from a Jew should go against ever cell in your being, if not you need to examine what great fault lies within yourself.

      “Then some Pharisees and teachers of the law came to Jesus from Jerusalem and asked,
      “Why do your disciples break the tradition of the elders? They don’t wash their hands before they eat!”

      Jesus replied, “And why do you break the command of God for the sake of your tradition?
      For God said, ‘Honor your father and mother’ [Exodus 20:12; Deuteronomy. 5:16] and ‘Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death.’[Exodus 21:17; Leviticus. 20:9]

      But you say that if anyone declares that what might have been used to help their father or mother is ‘devoted to God,’ they are not to ‘honor their father or mother’ with it. Thus you nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition. You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you:

      “‘These people honor me with their lips,
      but their hearts are far from me.

      They worship me in vain;
      their teachings are merely human rules.’[ Isaiah 29:13]”
      Matthew 15:1-9.

      • Thomas Covenant Unbeliever
        Thomas Covenant Unbeliever says:

        Judaism is Phariseeism. The religion of the Hebrews has been called Yahwism, among other things, but wasn’t named in the Old Testament.

        Christ cannot come from anti-Christ.

        Judaism was founded and codified in Babylon.

      • Ned J. Casper
        Ned J. Casper says:

        The fourth-century selection of Hebrew and Greek writings known as the Bible has given rise to all sorts of “interpretations”. It contains numerous contradictions, and ridiculous elements such as notion that all the human races and animal species on the planet descend from a collection of creatures in a floating ark a few thousand years ago.

        Luke 14.26 – disciples should hate their parents – a “contradiction” of Exodus 20.12? This verse appears in one of the only two books in the Bible probably drafted by an uncircumcised Gentile instead of a Jew like all the others.

        Amos 8.5-6 (Weimar), 8.9-10 (Auschwitz), 9.11-15 (Israel) – how about that for an interpretation, Volksgenossen?

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      …” morally upstanding behavior to ensure the survival of the nation “…

      The TEN Commandments , according to rabbinical scholars , was intended for maintaining internal jewish tribal cohesion in order to continue their conquests ( ie. acquisition of dominions ) of the world . The TEN moral laws were not intended to be applied toward their enemies whom they killed and robbed as commanded by their God . Christians somehow decided the TEN divine rules for behavior applied to friend and foe alike .

      Clearly , a moral code of behavior is dysfunctional if it is not relevant to achieving a specified goal . Many people believe or think that striving to attain one hundred percent fidelity to an established religiously ordained divine moral code is or should be the ultimate goal in life .

      Obviously , humanity is DOOMED by adhering to any moral code that is not relevant or is dysfunctional to attaining the technologies that will be needed for future generations to thrive-n-survive beyond

      {{ The Solar TOTAL Extinction Event }} .

      In other words , divine moral codes are not simultaneously both universal and absolute and must be adjusted as needed to remain relevant to sustaining the human potential for Everlasting Life via the acquisition of pertinent technologies .

      That is the reality for indefinite survival of humanity ( which includes also The Whites ) and is not an established religious fantasy .

      • Ned J. Casper
        Ned J. Casper says:

        Rabbis prescribe the Noahide laws for the Goyim.
        The Ten Commandments in practice have proved helpful in deterring Chistians from committing murder, theft and adultery, to general benefit.

      • Chris Moore
        Chris Moore says:

        “Obviously , humanity is DOOMED by adhering to any moral code that is not relevant or is dysfunctional to attaining the technologies that will be needed for future generations to thrive-n-survive beyond {{ The Solar TOTAL Extinction Event }} .In other words , divine moral codes are not simultaneously both universal and absolute and must be adjusted as needed to remain relevant to sustaining the human potential for Everlasting Life via the acquisition of pertinent technologies .”

        Okay. How are Marxism and Capitalism going to do that since they’ve conjoined and are allowing the West to be overrun with substandard IQ knuckle draggers in service of the elite’s materialist and power ambitions, hence changing the culture from from one of intellect and discipline to one of temporal hedonism?

        Right now I like Christian Russia’s chances a lot more than the hedonistic Idiocracy’s.

  5. William Gruff
    William Gruff says:

    ‘Jews accused of heretical religious views were beaten or murdered. Their books were burned or buried in cemeteries. When a heretic died, his body was beaten by a special burial committee, placed in a cart filled with dung, and deposited outside the Jewish cemetery.’

    This sort of depraved violence is of a type with the pornographic descriptions of atrocities Jewish ‘survivors’ allege were committed by Germans and their allies during the ‘Holocaust’, lending more weight to claims that the allegations are entirely bogus, nothing more than the product of sick minds.

    Jews did suffer, some of them appallingly but so did very many more non Jews and exaggerating the numbers and inventing disgustingly foul crimes serves simply, and rightly, to cast doubt on every allegation. Whose interests does that serve?

  6. Edward Harris
    Edward Harris says:

    I am a 79 year old mischling although I was jewd by a rabbi and the jews call me a jew. I do not have a jewish mother and so in spite of what the jews say, I am not a jew. According to the jew side of my family, nearly all of todays so called jews are descended from East Europeans who were converted by rabbis in the middle ages to increase the size of their congregations and incomes. I have always called them converts but I think glaubenjuden is better. I saw this, in the latest book published by the great historian David Irving, is what the Germans called the converts before Germany was occupied by the Americans and America was occupied by the Converts.
    Some of my ancestors were rabbis. They used to meet with other rabbis every 7 years in Jerusalem and saw the takeover of jewry by the glaubenjuden during the middle ages.
    I forget whether some of the glaubenjuden were relatives or close friends but I was told that they were against the mass murder of christians and said so. They were made to watch their children being tortured to death and then they were tortured to death by the glaubenjuden.
    After the successful glaubenjuden invasion of Russia (thank you USA) a series of meeetings were held to carve up Russia.
    At a meeting in the 1920’s of the repesentatives of the 14 families that owned the USSR decided to sell the Russian grain abroad to make money and starve the Christians.
    Trotsky was allowed to attend the meetings as an observer. Stalin was not present.
    I believe that much of the mass murder in the USSR was not caused by Stalin but caused by the hatred the jews have always had for christians.
    I hope mentioning the name David Irving did not cause any academics to poop their pants.

  7. Susan
    Susan says:

    Thanks for this important article. The conclusion is exactly right. The way has to be made for White European people to not continue to be guilt-tripped and intimidated into silence and to come out as proud of their heritage.

    The discussion about the founding of Israel reminded me of a movie we watched recently on Amazon Prime (which I would unsubscribe from but my husband won’t agree). It is “Cast a Giant Shadow”, 1966, with Kirk Douglas as Mickey Marcus, a real person. It is about the creation of Israel. Guest appearances were made by John Wayne and Frank Sinatra. It’s pretty hokey and the acting wooden so it’s amusing. Interesting to see how the Jews who made the movie portrayed the creation of the new country.

  8. Pierre de Craon
    Pierre de Craon says:

    Just as the radical Jews have been willing to push their less radical brethren out of the Jewish community, we must be willing to do the same.

    Where exactly is Karl Haemers, as self-anointed spokesman for the virtuously radical white “we” subset, willing to push those other white people he deems insufficiently radical? Southern Patagonia? Tristan da Cunha? Nunavut? A still-unrealized Guantánamo 2? Or does he see himself emulating those Jews whose utter lack of scrupulosity he clearly admires by pushing offending whites into a mass grave?

    Karl Haemers plainly likes to talk big, but whether he is prepared to talk frankly is yet to be revealed.

  9. Karl Haemers
    Karl Haemers says:

    Most of the comments are religious. I would assert that Jewish “anti-semitism” is mainly a racial trait, and the religious expression is derived from the racial. Quite obviously, most of this Jew on Jew hate is also a class divide. Jewish aristocracy brutalize the Jewish masses and use them deplorably for the selfish goals of the Jew leadership. This may be a trait of most class divides racially, National Socialist Germany one exception. Now the various racial aristocrats (oligarchs) have formed a class of their own together, and all the rest of we 99% are the underclass. This is both bad and good: when the oligarchs unify, their power becomes still greater; when the People become aware of their common enemy, their power can grow as well.

  10. James J O'Meara
    James J O'Meara says:

    Although you quote from Shahak’s essential book, I would add this bit from it as well: the very first occurrence of the term “anti-semitism” occurs in a circular letter (“encyclical”) from a Polish rabbi to his fellows, complaining that as part of his “liberation” of the Jews, Napoleon had forbidden rabbis from having their critics executed. The Polish Jews were indeed the most superstitious and backward of Jews, living in ghettos imposed on them not by the gentile authorities but by these tyrannical rabbis

  11. Ned J. Casper
    Ned J. Casper says:

    Some of the anti-Jewish comments on TOO generalise from small data samples. For example, the idea that “the Jews” will deliberately destroy everyone else and then foolishly die out themselves occupies a fantasy world, or that they welcome a Muslim domination of Europe. Strange assumptions about people who provide the ablest chess masters and can study financial prospects better than most. That they are a complex bunch does not contradict this.

    My comments on South Africa were more apposite to the essay by Mr Langdon. However, I don’t think Jews are terribly happy with the chaos in South Africa or ANC hostility to Israel.

  12. Brendan James Trainor
    Brendan James Trainor says:

    It might be useful to call the Jews of that period by their non shortened full name-Judahites or Iudahites. The children of Israel of the Northern Kingdom were generally assimilationists. It was only the tribe of Judah, and part of tribe of Benjamin, who were coerced into following the Levites. The Levites returned with the Persians, who the Levites convinced Yahweh was a local manifestation of the Persian monotheistic god Ahura Mazda.
    Yahweh appears to scholars now to have been a wilderness god, worshipped by Nomads who lived in the region south of the Dead Sea encompassing Edom and Midia. Probably originally a volcano god, what with all the volcanic imagery associated with him.
    Archeologists found many Judahite and Israelite homes had two shrines, one to Yahweh, and the other to his consort, Asherah
    Indeed, in Deuteronomy we see the Levites purging the feminine aspect by condemning the Asherite Poles, which were kind of May Poles erected in her honor.
    However, Asherah had the last laugh. Her symbol was the tree, her figurines show her legs fused together like a tree trunk. The Holy of Holies contained the Ark of the Covenant, where Yahweh dwelled, but it also contained the Minorah candelabra. What does the Minorah represent? A tree of course!
    Even the levites could separate Yahweh and Asherah!

Comments are closed.