The Holocaust of Six Million Jews—in World War I

I take it that the reader is familiar with the basics of the so-called Holocaust: the alleged deaths of some six million Jews, many in gas chambers, at the hands of the Nazis in World War II.  This was, we are told, a deliberate policy of Hitler and his top men, something of highest priority—even above the war effort itself—and a policy of the utmost secrecy.  It was so secret, in fact, that hard documentation and forensic evidence on this catastrophic, world-changing event are almost nonexistent:  no ‘Hitler order’ to kill the Jews, no plans for homicidal gas chambers, no physical remains of gas chambers,[1] no photos of gas chambers or gassed Jews, no autopsies confirming death by gas, no consistent or coherent records of mass shootings that must have totaled over 1.5 million, no evidence of any of the 1 million or so ghetto deaths.  Those ingenious devils, the Nazis, managed to destroy all the evidence—including the physical remains of virtually all six million Jewish corpses—in order to conceal their heinous deed.  They were truly evil geniuses.  Or so we are told.

But this is not my topic for today.  For the full story of the incredible World War II Holocaust, I must refer interested readers to my books The Holocaust: An Introduction (for the concise version), or, for a more detailed discussion, Debating the Holocaust: A New Look at Both Sides (4th ed, 2020).  Also recommended is the book by Germar Rudolf, Lectures on the Holocaust (2017).  Suffice to say that there are many facts about this notorious event that our friendly ‘Holocaust experts’ would rather have us not know.

Today, though, I want to focus on a related but perhaps more surprising event:  the Jewish “holocaust” of World War I.  (I will use the lower-case ‘holocaust’ for pre-WWII, reserving the upper-case ‘Holocaust’ for WWII itself.)

Wait, you say; World War I?  But didn’t that occur decades before WWII?  Yes.  Wasn’t that years before the Nazi party even existed?  True enough.  Wasn’t Hitler a mere foot soldier in that initial war?  Indeed he was.  Then who committed the crime?  And why?  And how many Jews suffered in that holocaust?

It is truly a remarkable story, one that is too little known.  It has often been said that “history repeats itself.”  But who would have guessed that a monumentally tragic event like a holocaust could repeat itself, inflicted on the same people, in the same region of the world, and in the same numbers, in just three decades?  This amazing occurrence is worth a bit of exploration; the holocaust of WW1 has huge implications for the Holocaust of WWII, and by extension, for Jewish-Gentile relations in the world today.

Context for War

The precursors and causes of WW1 are vast and complicated, and I cannot delve into those here.  But a key factor, and likely decisive, was the action of the global Jewish Lobby of the day, which pushed for war at every possible juncture; I have detailed this aspect in my book The Jewish Hand in the World Wars (2019), and I refer interested readers to it.  The same Jewish Lobby, it turns out, also had a decisive hand in the holocaust narratives.

For the moment, I will have to restrict myself to the basic facts.  World War I, as we recall, began in July 1914 and ran for a bit more than four years, ending on 11 November 1918.  The Triple Entente of the UK, France, and Russia faced off against the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy, although Italy dropped out of the Alliance in 1915.  The US eventually entered the war (on the side of the Entente) in April 1917.  Russia, torn apart by the Judeo-Bolshevik Revolution, withdrew in March 1918.  Germany held out for another seven months, but eventually, in November 1918, it too succumbed, in part as a result of internal Jewish agitation,.  In the end, the Alliance suffered some 8 million total casualties (military plus civilian), and the Entente around 10 million.  Despite the many complicating factors, a defeated Germany was ultimately assigned full blame for the war—completely overlooking the fact that that nation “did not plot a European war, did not want one, and made genuine…efforts to avert one,” in the words of historian Sidney Fay.[2]  The onerous postwar reparations inflicted on Germany set the stage, in large part, for the later emergence of Hitler and his NSDAP party.

As in all wars, many civilians were caught in the crosshairs; here, the Jews were no exception.  Their suffering, however, had already been ongoing for many years prior to the war.  Or perhaps we should say, selfinflicted suffering.  Jewish behavior, attitudes, actions, and beliefs have been a constant source of conflict throughout the centuries—even through millennia.[3]  Jewish abrasiveness became particularly pressing by the late 18th century, as was noted by many prominent critics, including Kant, Voltaire, Hegel, Fichte, and Herder.  By the mid-19th century, the likes of Schopenhauer and Bruno Bauer were issuing scathing critiques.

A particularly disturbing situation, though, was developing in Russia.  By the late 1800s, Russia had some 5 million Jews within its borders, nearly all of whom lived in the so-called Pale of Settlement in the far west of the country; this represented about half of the global total of around 10 million Jews.  This large Jewish population was a disruptive and agitating force within Russia and hence earned the dislike of Czars Nicholas I (reigned 1825 to 1855) and Alexander II (reigned 1855 to 1881).  By 1871, Russian activist Mikhail Bakunin could make this observation about the Jews:

This whole Jewish world which constitutes a single exploiting sect, a sort of bloodsucker people (ein Blutegelvolk), a collective parasite (einzigen fressenden Parasiten), voracious, organized in itself, not only across the frontiers of states but even across all the differences of political opinion—this world is presently, at least in great part, at the disposal of Marx on the one hand and of the Rothschilds on the other. …  Jewish solidarity, that powerful solidarity that has maintained itself through all history, united them [both].[4]

In 1881, a gang of anarchists known as Narodnaya Volya, which included a few Jews, succeeded in assassinating Alexander; this unleashed a series of anti-Jewish pogroms that persisted for decades.

By the late 1880s, American media was beginning to take notice of the Jewish situation in Russia—especially the New York Times.  A brief item from 1889 began with the question “How many Jews are there?” meaning, globally.  At a minimum, “the number of the ubiquitous race [is] 6,000,000.”  It then continues with a reference to Jewish suffering: “With the exception of half a million, they are all in a state of political bondage.”  Furthermore, “in Russia alone there were 4,000,000 of their race whose every step was dogged by that curse, religious hatred and persecution.”[5]  Here we find an early reference to (almost) six million suffering Jews.

Another short piece appeared in 1891 entitled “Russia’s Christianity: Rabbi Gottheil says a word on the persecution of the Jews.”  In a public lecture, Gottheil examined a number of facts “in relation to the treatment of Russia’s 5,000,000 to 6,000,000 Jews by the Christian population.”  Notably, the population of Russian Jews, which was just 4 million two years earlier, was now as high as 6 million.  Gottheil then proceeds to quote a recent article by one E. B. Lanin, who said, “about six millions [sic] persecuted and miserable wretches remain steadfastly faithful to a religion that causes their life to be changed into a fiery furnace.”[6]  Prophetic, indeed.

Nearly a decade later, in June 1900, Rabbis Gottheil and Stephen Wise were the keynote speakers at a “Zionist mass meeting” in New York.  They were anxious to highlight Jewish suffering around the world to help make their case for a Jewish homeland in Palestine.  Gottheil spoke generically of the “oppressed in Russia,” but Wise made the point explicit: “There are 6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism.”[7]  Within a few years, the pogroms became increasingly intense, eventually leading to small-scale killings.  The so-called “Kishineff (or Kishinev) massacre” of 1903, in which all of 49 Jews were killed, became, for the first time, a “holocaust.”  The NYT quotes from an editorial of the Jewish Chronicle:

We charge the Russian Government with responsibility for the Kishineff massacre.  We say it is steeped to the eyes in the guilt of this holocaust.  (16 May, p. 1)

The editorial goes on to speak of how the Russian Jews are being “slowly annihilated” and subject to “the process of extermination.”  Such words obviously anticipate similar charges that would be leveled against the National Socialists some four decades later.

Two years later, we read that the “holocaust” is still ongoing.  A short item of 1905 is headlined “Simon Wolf asks how long the Russian holocaust is to continue.”[8]  Also that year, the NYT reported, once again, on “our 6,000,000 cringing brothers in Russia.”[9]  The following year, in 1906, we read of “startling reports of the condition and future of Russia’s 6,000,000 Jews”; it is a “horrifying picture” of “renewed massacres” and “systematic and murderous extermination.”[10]  At this point, one is tempted to ask: What is it about the Jews, such that they are subject to such continual and horrific abuse?  And furthermore, why isn’t the figure of six million, first reported back in 1890, growing any larger?  Is it now, somehow, fixed at six million?  If so, why?

In 1910, we find “Russian Jews in sad plight,” and we are saddened over “the systematic, relentless, quiet grinding down of a people of more than 6,000,000 souls.”[11]  In 1911, the New York Times reported that “the 6,000,000 Jews of Russia are singled out for systematic oppression and for persecution by due process of law.”[12]  And yet things got worse still:

That Russia is pursuing a definite anti-Jewish policy, that the condition of the Jews in Russia is worse now than it ever was before, will be gathered from the following extracts… [T]he restrictive laws now in existence…intensif[y] the oppression of the Jews, and by which it is making the 6,000,000 Jews a people economically exhausted—a people without any rights at all.  (10 December, p. SM8)

We need to remind ourselves that the leading Russians had a very low opinion of the Jews, and felt themselves fully justified in any recrimination.  Sometimes their words were shocking.  Russian prime minister Pyotr Stolypin wrote the following in 1911:

It is important that racial characteristics have so drastically set the Jewish people apart from the rest of humanity as to make them totally different creatures, who cannot enter into our concept of human nature.  We can observe them the way we observe and study animals, we can feel disgust for them or hostility, the way we do for the hyena, the jackal, or the spider, but to speak of hatred for them would raise them to our level. …  Only by disseminating in the popular consciousness the concept that the creature of the Jewish race is not the same as other people, but an imitation of a human, with whom there can be no dealings—only that can gradually heal the national organism and weaken the Jewish nation so it will no longer be able to do harm, or will completely die out.  History knows of many extinct tribes.  Science must put, not the Jewish race, but the character of Jewry into such condition as will make it perish.[13]

Just a few months later, Stolypin was assassinated by a Jewish radical, Dmitri Bogrov.

I emphasize that it was not only the New York Times that was reporting on the six million suffering Hebrews.  Zionist Jews were repeating the same lines to their own people.  Speaking at the 1911 Zionist Congress, Max Nordau said the following:

Virtuous governments…lay the groundwork with their own hands for the destruction of six million persons, and no one except the victims themselves raises his voice against this—even though this, of course, is an infinitely greater crime than any war which as yet has never destroyed six million human lives.[14]

Thus we find repeated linkage, over a period of many years, of “six million,” “extermination,” and “holocaust” with respect to the Jews.  History indeed repeats itself.

Into the Great War

It seems, then, that our holocaust journey is even more intriguing than I indicated above.  The first Jewish holocaust occurred in Russia, running, at a minimum, from the years 1903 through 1911.  We don’t know how many Jews were killed in that period, but it was unquestionably small, given the over-emphasis on relatively minor events in which, for example, 49 were killed (see Andrew Joyce’s “Revisiting the Nineteenth-Century Russian Pogroms”).  Based on scattered reports, the total would have been on the order of a few thousand, at most.  And yet, the figure of 6 million recurred repeatedly, as a kind of token of mass Jewish suffering.  This set the stage for the second holocaust, of World War One, as I am about to explain.  And this, of course, leaves “the” Holocaust of World War II as holocaust number three.  A rather remarkable turn of events, and one not likely to be covered in your local history class.

As I stated above, World War I began in July 1914.  Already in December of that year we were reading accounts of mass suffering of Jews—and we can guess the number.  The New York Times reported as follows:

Appeal for aid for Jews: American Committee tells of Suffering Due to War.  The American Jewish Relief Committee called a conference…to consider the plight of more than 6,000,000 Jews who live within the war zone.  (2 December, p. 12)

The “war zone” in question was the Eastern Front, which ran through parts of present-day Poland, Ukraine, Austria, and Hungary, as well as portions of western Russia.  Just a month later, the Times reported,

In the world today there are about 13,000,000 Jews, of whom more than 6,000,000 are in the very heart of the war zone; Jews whose lives are at stake and who today are subjected to every manner of sorrow and suffering.  (14 January, p. 3)

A year later, we read that the head of a Jewish aid society has declared that “even the wrongs of the Belgians could not be compared to the outrages heaped upon the Polish Jews. ‘Nearly six million Jews are ruined, in the greatest moral and material misery. … And the world is silent’.”[15]  And in case we had forgotten, the Times would soon remind us that, indeed, this horrific situation constituted…a holocaust.  In October, a Jewish organization—The Joint Distribution Committee of Funds for Jewish War Sufferers—launched a $10 million appeal with these words:

The new campaign is the largest ever undertaken by Jews of the United States. …  Dr. Judah Magnes has been enabled [to ascertain] the present needs of the Jewish people in Europe, who have fallen under the blight of the world holocaust.  (29 October, p. E9)

Into 1917, the war evolved into a sort of stalemate, with the infamous trenches defining much of the front.  Despite growing fatalities on all sides, the number of suffering Jews stayed remarkably constant: “Six millions [sic] of Jews are living in lands where they are oppressed, exploited, crushed, and robbed of every inalienable human right.”[16]  By September of that year, the Times was reporting on an appeal for an aid fund,

to alleviate the suffering of Jews in the European war zones…[whose] suffering is unparalleled [!] in history. … [W]omen, children, and babies must be saved if the Jewish race is to survive the terrible holocaust…  (24 September, p. 20)

Once again, we see the repeated connection between ‘holocaust’ and ‘six million’ suffering Jews.

By mid-October of 1918, it was becoming clear—at least to the crew at the New York Times—that the war was about to end.  Hence they excitedly reported on an astonishing “$1 billion fund to rebuild Jewry” (18 October, p. 12).[17]  As it turns out, of those “six millions” of Jews who were suffering, starving, and dying in the “holocaust”—well, miraculously, all of them survived.  And they needed cash.  “Six million souls will need help to resume normal life when war is ended,” we read.  Send your checks now.

Interwar Holocaust?

No sooner had World War I ended than our ever-industrious Jewish Lobby went to work again, conjuring up yet more Jewish suffering.  In September 1919—less than one year after the war—the New York Times was reporting on renewed mass Jewish suffering, now in Poland and Ukraine.  In a story headlined “Ukrainian Jews Aim to Stop Pogroms,” we read, with by now little surprise, that “6,000,000 are in peril.”  Apparently half of these are in Poland, half in Ukraine, but “all of whom are in need of assistance from America.”  According to the story, President Wilson had recently issued a statement of concern in which he said:

This fact that the population of 6,000,000 souls in Ukrainia and Poland have received notice through action and by word that they are going to be completely exterminated—this fact stands before the whole world as the paramount issue of the day.  (8 September, p. 6)

Assuredly so.

Lest we might forget, this situation was quickly described as, yes, a “holocaust.”  In one of the most craven and pandering articles ever to be penned by a non-Jewish politician, former New York governor Martin Glynn published an essay for American Hebrew in October 1919, titled “The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop!”  It reads, in part:

From across the sea, six million men and women call to us for help, and eight hundred thousand little children cry for bread. … With them reside the illimitable possibilities for the advancement of the human race as naturally would reside in six million human beings. …  In this catastrophe, when six million human beings are being whirled toward the grave by a cruel and relentless fate. …  Six million men and women are dying from lack of the necessaries of life; eight hundred thousand children cry for bread. …  In this threatened ho­locaust of human life, forgotten are the niceties of philosophical distinction. …  And so in the spirit that turned the poor widow’s votive offering of copper into silver … the people of this country are called upon to sanctify their money by giving $35 million in the name of the humanity of Moses to six million famished men and women.  Six million men and women are dying…  [italics added]

A truly appalling bit of servility, if there ever was one.  Clearly Glynn owed much to his Hebrew supporters.

The very next month, the NYT reported on prominent Jewish banker Felix Warburg, who had recently traveled to Europe to witness the suffering firsthand:

The successive blows of contending armies have all but broken the back of European Jewry, and have reduced to tragically unbelievable poverty, starvation, and disease about 6,000,000 souls, or half the Jewish population on the earth.  (12 November, p. 7)

The storyline persisted in subsequent years:

*  April 1920:  “Mr. Louis Marshall declared that typhus menaced 6,000,000 Jews of Europe.”[18]

*  May 1920:  “Hunger, cold rags, desolation, disease, death—six million human beings without food, shelter, clothing…”

*  July 1921:  “Russia’s 6,000,000 Jews are facing extermination by massacre” (again!).

*  September 1924:  “1,235 Pogroms” in the Soviet Union; “The Jewish population, which number in Russia over 6,000,000, live scattered. …  [Events] have subjected the Jews to greater suffering than any other section of the Russian population.”

And so on.  But the point is proven.  Through a long series of incredible, unbelievable circumstances, six million Jews were perpetually suffering through various incarnations of a “holocaust” for decades prior to World War II.  Such references tapered off through the 1930s, but accelerated again with the approach of the second great war.  Several mentions of the “six million” appeared between 1936 and 1939.  With the onset of war in September 1939, the predictions became explicit.  In June of 1940, leading Zionist Nahum Goldmann was quoted as saying “Six million Jews in Europe are doomed to destruction, if the victory of the Nazis should be final.”[19]  What an astonishing prediction!  How could Goldmann have known, at that early date, of the final death toll?  Jewish foresight never fails to amaze.


The facts here are clear and indisputable.  The reader is strongly encouraged to look up a few of the old New York Times citations that I mentioned, to confirm that the words are really there.  Most any online search engine or a local library research database can find them.  They are highly damning.  Our friends in the Jewish Lobby have no plausible reply, no reasonable defense, no good explanation; they can only stifle the whole discussion.  And this is precisely what they do.

There are clear lessons here for history.  If six million Jews suffered, but very few died, in the first holocaust (Russia), and if another six million suffered, but very few died, in the second holocaust (World War I), then we might reasonably infer, by inductive logic, that perhaps the alleged toll in the third Holocaust (World War II) was—let us say—not quite right.  Especially so, given the facts that I mentioned at the very start of this essay.  We can also plausibly infer that the claimed ‘six million’ figure of World War II did not come from a body count—it didn’t—but rather is a symbolic number, a token, used over many years, to represent mass Jewish suffering.  As an actual death toll, it could be far removed from reality.

And if all this is true, then there are profound consequences.  First, we must significantly rewrite our history of the mid-twentieth-century; second, we have to hold accountable all those historians and politicians, Jewish or otherwise, who foisted upon us a distorted picture of human suffering; and third, we need to recompensate Germany, Switzerland, Belgium, and all those who were extorted into paying billions in “reparations” to Israel and global Jewry.  It is not hard to find the money; American Jews alone own or control perhaps $50 trillion in assets, and this would go a long way toward a restorative justice.[20]  We have the means.  We need only muster the will to act.


Thomas Dalton, PhD, has authored or edited several books and articles on politics, history, and religion, with a special focus on National Socialism in Germany.  His works include a new translation series of Mein Kampf, and the books Eternal Strangers (2020), The Jewish Hand in the World Wars (2019), and Debating the Holocaust (4th ed, 2020).  Most recently he has edited a new edition of Rosenberg’s classic work Myth of the 20th Century and a new book of political cartoons, Pan-Judah!.  All these works are available at  See also his personal website

[1] Those alleged gas chambers that they show to tourists in Auschwitz Main Camp, Majdanek, and Dachau are postwar reconstructions, and could never have functioned as mass killing sites using poison gas.  See my books for details.

[2] As quoted in Fay’s “classic study” of the war, The Origins of the World War (1928), p. 552.

[3] For this story, see my book Eternal Strangers (2020).

[4] Cited in Wheen, Karl Marx (1999), p. 340.

[5] 10 February, p. 14.

[6] 26 January, p. 8.

[7] 11 June, p. 7.  Incidentally, the New York Times was, by this time, formally a Jewish newspaper; Adolph Ochs purchased the firm in 1896.  It has retained Jewish ownership and management ever since.

[8] 10 November, p. 2.

[9] 23 March, p. 7.

[10] 25 March, p. SM6.

[11] 11 April, p. 18.

[12] 31 October, p. 5.

[13] Cited in Vaksberg, Stalin Against the Jews (1994), p. 6.

[14] Cited in Herzl Year Book, vol. 2 (1959), p. 156.  The chapter author explicitly comments on Nordau’s “astonishing accuracy.”

[15] 28 February, p. 8.

[16] 22 January, p. 6.

[17] In present-day dollars, this would come to almost $20 billion.

[18] Notably, it was typhus that likely produced most Jewish fatalities during WW2.

[19] 25 June, p. 4.

[20] See my essay, “A brief look at Jewish wealth” (2019).  But the situation has become even more extreme due to the Covid pandemic, during which Jewish tech billionaires prospered immensely.  Just the five wealthiest American Jews—Larry Ellison, Larry Page, Sergey Brin, Mark Zuckerberg, and Michael Bloomberg—now own over half a trillion dollars.  We need to contemplate this for a moment:  five individual men, five Jews, collectively own more than $500 billion.  When we then consider the total wealth of the six million or so American Jews, it is quite easy to reach $50 trillion, or more.

49 replies
  1. Tim Folke
    Tim Folke says:

    Thank you, Dr. Dalton! Quite informative.

    I will just add that it is troubling how these people have a fixation with the number six. FDR’s Levantine advisors desired that, if possible, D-Day be launched on the sixth hour of the sixth day of the sixth month (which did happen), the six-pointed star which comprises a hexagon crowned by six triangles crowned by six points, and so on.

    For those who take an interest in the Bible one may consider the passage that says one cannot buy or sell without the mark of the beat, which is 666. As this verse describes a proscription on financial transactions one cannot help but thinking of that group which – more than any other group – immerses itself in financial affairs.

    • Philip Power
      Philip Power says:

      The following is an article written by an American Jew in 1928:
      By Marcus Eli Ravage
      Reprinted from The Century Magazine January 1928

      Of course, you do resent us. It is no good telling me you don’t. So let us not waste any time on denials and alibis. You know you do, and I know it, and we understand each other. To be sure, some of your best friends are Jews, and all that. I have heard that before once or twice, I think. And I know too, that you do not include me personally – “me” being any particular individual Jew – when you fling out at us in your wholesale fashion, because I am, well, so different, don’t you know, almost as good as one of yourselves. That little exemption does not, somehow, move me to gratitude; but never mind that now. It is the aggressive, climbing, pushing, materialistic sort you dislike – those, in a world, who remind you so much of your own up-and-coming brethren. We understand each other perfectly. I don’t hold it against you.
      Bless my soul; I do not blame anybody for disliking anybody. The thing that intrigues me about this anti-Jewish business, as you play at it, you make such fantastic and transparent excuses, you seem to be suffering from self-consciousness so horribly, that if the performance were not so grotesque it would be irritating.
      It is not as if you were amateurs: you have been at it for over fifteen centuries. Yet watching you and hearing your childish pretexts, one might get the impression that you did not know yourselves what it is all about. You resent us, but you cannot clearly say why. You think up a new excuse – a “reason” is what you call it – every other day. You have been piling up justification for yourself these many hundreds of years and each new invention is more laughable than the last and each new excuse contradicts and annihilates the last.
      Not so many years ago I used to hear that we were money-grubbers and commercial materialists; now the complaint is being whispered around that no art and no profession is safe against Jewish invasion.
      We are, if you are to be believed, at once clannish and exclusive, and unassimilable because we won’t intermarry with you, and we are also climbers and pushers and a menace to your racial integrity.
      Our standard of living is so low that we create your slums and sweat industries, and so high that we crowd you out of your best residential sections. We shirk our patriotic duty in wartime because we are pacifists by nature and tradition, and we are the arch-plotters of universal wars and the chief beneficiaries of those wars (see “The protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”.)
      We are at once the founders and leading adherents of capitalism and the chief perpetrators of the rebellion against capitalism.
      Surely, history has nothing like us for versatility!
      And oh!
      I almost forgot the reasons of reasons. We are the stiff-necked people who never accepted Christianity, and we are the criminal people who crucified its founder.
      But I tell you, you are self-deceivers.
      You lack either the self-knowledge or the mettle to face the facts squarely and own up to the truth. You resent the Jew not because, as some of you seem to think, we crucified Jesus but because we gave him birth. Your real quarrel with us is not that we have rejected Christianity but that we have imposed it upon you!
      Your loose, contradictory charges against us are not a patch on the blackness of our proved historic offence. You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit the charge.
      What of it?
      Compared with what Paul the Jew of Tarsus accomplished in Rome, the Russian upheavals a mere street brawl.
      You make much noise and fury about the undue Jewish influence in your theatres and movie palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well-founded. But what is that compared to our staggering influence in your churches, your schools, your laws and your governments, and the very thoughts you think every day?
      A clumsy Russian forges a set of papers and publishes them in a book called “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” which shows that we plotted to bring on the late World War. You believe that book. All right. For the sake of argument, we will underwrite every word of it. It is genuine and authentic. But what is that besides the unquestionable historical conspiracy which we have carried out, which we never have denied because you never had the courage to charge us with it, and of which the full record is extant for anybody to read?
      If you really are serious when you talk of Jewish plots, may I not direct your attention to one worth talking about? What use is it wasting words on the alleged control of your public opinion by Jewish financiers, newspaper owners, and movie magnates, when you might as well justly accuse us of the proved control of your whole civilization by the Jewish Gospels?
      You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt.
      We are intruders.
      We are disturbers.
      We are subverters.
      We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them.
      We have been at the bottom of not merely the latest Great War but of nearly all your wars, not only of the Russian but of nearly every other major revolution in your history.
      We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life.
      We are still doing it. No one can tell how long, we shall go on doing it.

      Google the rest of the article!

      • Tim Folke
        Tim Folke says:

        Um, I am sure you mean well, but I have a hard time following your thoughts.

        Perhaps being briefer, with punctuation and shorter paragraphs would go far in communicating your message.

      • Emicho
        Emicho says:

        The idea that the Protocols were imagined up out of nothing but antisemitism by bigoted Russians, is itself one of the most Jewish things imaginable.
        The Tsarist Secret Police may have been the most bumbling, flat-footed collection of Inspector Clouseaus’ ever entrusted with an emperor’s protection detail.
        When they came for their boss the Jews got close enough to throw a bomb at his carriage, at which point Alexander helpfully removed himself from his vehicle and allowed them to finish the job off with the second bomb.
        It wasn’t exactly an Ocean’s 11-type job.
        Yet we are supposed to swallow the idea this crowd of ‘strategic security brains’ masterminded a Baldrick-type ‘cunning plan’ of revenge to travel to the other side of Europe, have an almost supernaturally profound work of politico-socio-economical genius written & printed in French, with predictive powers that dwarfed Nostradamas, political intelligence that dwarfed Machiavelli, all tied up in a lurid tale of mischief to rivel William Shakespeare?
        Where this powder keg would sit undisturbed until found by some obscure Orthadox monk, who’d finally take it to Russia, so the illiterate Russian peasants would . . what? Hate the Jews even more than they already did?
        It’s the sort of story that makes the official version of 9/11 look water tight.
        What is so breath-taking about all these ridiculous hoaxes is not that so many people believe them, nor how long they’ve been believed, and not even the calibre of the men who assure us soberly they’re true.
        What defies belief is how quickly the official story falls apart the second you critique them, and what a total shambles of gibberish the whole thing turns into if you simply spend a couple hours looking into them.
        Obviously 9/11 and the Holocaust are the most obvious insults to intelligence. You could put this Covid hoax in the same category.
        But sometimes it’s just little things, items to dominate, or even just appear on say, a weekend’s news cycle on CNN or FOX News.
        Good examples of these smaller hoaxes that have been basically destroyed by independent investigations are the fake Manchester arena bombing and the fake murder of British MP Jo Cox.
        Truly nothing is too big, or small, to manipulate the goyim for sport.

        • charles frey
          charles frey says:

          Biting, and very amusingly written sarcasm, conjuring visible images.
          Nostradamus, Machiavelli and Shakespeare all together in a single sentence.

          Perhaps we will see the day on which Wikipedia has different entries for the Protocols for the left and right. You could then submit this comment as the entry for the right.

          Wasn’t Trotsky living in Paris at the time in question, earning a living as a ” journalist ? ” And what about the Zionist conference in not far off Basel ? As sources for the Protocols.

          • Emicho
            Emicho says:

            I find it hard to be of the persuasion that the ‘official stories’ they offer up for these obvious hoaxes aren’t deliberately absurd. I don’t know, perhaps it’s a version of the Big Lie they use. The official storys are always so dumb, so insulting to a vaguely intelligent person, it couldn’t possibly be false, could it? Surely they wouldn’t lie on such a gigantic, shameless scale?
            There’s something about the masses where they fall for this time & time again. Hitler explained the psychology of it. And how the Jews use it as a weapon.
            For his pains, the Jews brainwashed the world that the Nazis themselves invented the Big Lie.
            This is nothing against Jews, no-one expects anything different from them. But where were the gentile intellectuals? Hitler does them a great favour, and they betray him by backing the lying Jews version?
            It’s a good idea, Trotsky, the early Zionist conferences, but from what little I know of the subject, it was more probably written roughly 1830ish, with modern passages inserted to make the thing look newer.
            I don’t think it was a Jew, or if it was, a Benjamin Freeman type Jew. It was written in a kind of fiction style, this was to make it more readable to more people.
            Sadly this has always been it’s Achilles Heel, as it’s made it too easy to be classed as fake conspiracy theory rubbish.

  2. Philip Power
    Philip Power says:

    HOW JEWS GOT THEIR 6000000
    Another example, as is seen from Chouraqui’s treatment of the German Jews. “The German Jews,” says Mr. Andre Chouraqui (op. cit,. p. 66), “were almost totally exterminated by the Nazis.” Now, however, we know, and all the Jewish historians and statisticians agree, including Mr. Andre Chouraqui himself, that out of the 500,000 given by Mr. Arthur Ruppin as living in Germany in 1926, or the 540,000 given by post-war Jewish statistics for the number living there in 1933, about 300,000 left the country between 1933 and 1939, and that 40,000, according to Mr Poliakov and the Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation, or 80,000 according to Mr. Raul Hilberg were still alive in 1945. Hence, the total number of survivors is 340,000 or 380,000 depending on whose figures are used. With some 340,000 survivors out of a population of 500,000 or 540,000 a conclusion that German Jewry was “almost totally exterminated” is hardly an example of intellectual honesty. By which it is seen that the nonsensical style that allows one to sow confusion also allows one to develop a sensational effect. As the figure for the total, immigration for December 31, 1957, he gives the figure of 896,462, according to his data, on page 65, and the figure of 896,085, according to the data of others, on page 66. Finally, when he gives it straight from the statistics themselves, it becomes 905,655. The same is true for the total population of the State of Israel which on December 31, 1957, is 1,954,954 at page 64, and which becomes 1,763,600 Jews and 213,000 Christians and Moslems, yielding a total of 1,976,000 at page 74. If it were a question of orders of magnitude one would understand it and overlook it, but in every case, these are estimates down to the unit. So it is a test. Mme. Hannah Arendt and Mr. Raul Hilberg, I confess, have not done much better.
    Source:Paul Rassinier

  3. Odessa Choppo
    Odessa Choppo says:

    EXCELLENT ARTICLE! This is a great piece to use in educating the JQ blind. I’ve tried many approaches, but using concise and significant articles seem to be the best initial spark of change.

  4. William Gruff
    William Gruff says:

    ‘ … second, we have to hold accountable all those historians and politicians, Jewish or otherwise, who foisted upon us a distorted picture of human suffering … ‘

    What does holding them accountable mean? Does it entail simply telling them how cross we are with them and then letting them live quietly in retirement, or are we going to demand ‘an eye for an eye’?

  5. Milan
    Milan says:

    The day I learned Rothschilds came from a family of Rabbi’s the alarm bells went off. The day i learned Warburg came from a line of Rabbi’s the alarm bells went off. Then to learn Marx was also from a line of Rabbi’s well horror starts to set in. And then came this from an old book:

    The House of Rothschild

    Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) of Frankfurt, Germany, studied originally to be a rabbi. Later, however, he turned his interests to finance and, with his five sons, established the famous banking house in Frankfurt. Four of the sons were later sent to Vienna, London, Paris, and Naples to set up branches of their family bank. This combine soon became the most powerful banking establishment of Europe. Amschel Rothschild, the eldest son, remained with his father in Frankfurt and became the treasurer of the German Confederation. Salomon, the second son, founder of the Vienna branch, became a leading personality in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Nathan, the third son, founder of the London branch, became the most powerful man in English finance. Carl, the fourth son, founder of the Naples branch, became one of the most powerful men in Italy. James (Jacob), the flfth son, founder of the Paris branch, soon dominated the financial destiny of France. By 1850, the House of Rothschild represented more wealth than all the royal families of Europe and Britain combined.

    Hmmm? One family ‘More wealth than all of the royal families of Europe!’ WHAT!?!?!?!?!

    and then came this morsel:

    After pondering these writings, I asked myself how far back one could trace this organized plan for control of world finance. On July 4,1856, Benjamin Disraeli declared declared before the British House of Commons,

    The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.

    Some of the strongest words that came to my attention were those of Curtis B. Dall, written in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on April 1968, as an introduction to H. S. Kenan’s book on the Federal Reserve Bank. In reference to the international bankers, Mr. Dall writes,

    They are driving toward complete control of the world’s long-range monetary policy and principal world markets for their own profit. They foment foreign wars to aid this objective.

    and finally who was responsible for the formation of the Federal Reserve?

    from a Professor E.R.A. Seligman, himself of the international banking family and head of the Department of Economics at Cloumbia University, said:

    The Federal Reserve Act is the work of Mr. Warburg more than any other man.

    and lastly from Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of Banking and Currency Committee, seemed to reach the same conclusion. On March 4, 1933, he said to Congress,

    We know from assertions made here by the Honorable John Garner, Vice-President of United States, Paul Warburg did come here from Hamburg, Germany, for one purpose-to take over the treasury of United States as the international bankers have done with the treasuries of Europe.

    Regarding the so-called group of international bankers, Mr. McFadden said further on June 10, 1932,

    It controls everything here, and it controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will.

    Does not all of this take one back to some sage words from guess who? St. John 8 of course starting verse 39!!!!!!!

    Strange with so much success you’d think everyone would be bankers, but who wants competition?

  6. Lord Snooty
    Lord Snooty says:

    In the UK, when I was a lad, the Holocaust of WWII was always referred to as ‘The Final Solution’. It was only under the influence of Hollywood that, by the 1980s, ‘Holocaust’ became the preferred term, which also coincided with the event being sacralized as a “Passion narrative” for liberals.

    On that WWII Holocaust: Can Thomas Dalton – or an Occidental Observer regular – point me towards an on-line article that elucidates Himmler’s contentious Posen speeches?

      HUGO FUERST says:

      Also a meticulous refutation of Longerich’s latest book – on the Wannsee Conference, favorably reviewed by Frank Ellis in “The Quarterly Review” online.

      • Lord Snooty
        Lord Snooty says:

        Thanks for responding.

        Frank Ellis’s review of Longerich’s book on the Wannsee Conference makes some valid points regarding the similarities between Soviet and Nazi operations against ‘undesirables’. Ellis insists that the wording “The Final Solution to the Jewish Question” unambiguously implies ‘extermination’, but it sounds ambiguous to me! It could just refer to the suggested resettlement of Jews in old Soviet Gulag camps (mentioned by Ellis) after the presumed victory over Stalin.

        On Himmler’s Posen speeches: Thomas Dalton will have reviewed the evidence in one of his many books, but I’m hoping there is an online article taking a revisionist approach.

  7. anonym
    anonym says:

    The constant repetition of “6 million” and the establishing of the odd antiquated term “holocaust” (“holy sacrifice in fire”) indicates that there is something else underlying their fervent declamations.

    It’s hardly by chance that it coincides with the era of the “Historical Sabbath”. The rabbis view history through the prophesies of Isaiah, the commentaries in Talmud and the cabbalistic texts. They divide history into seven millennia, one for each day of the six days of creation and the sabbath, and according to their calculations we currently live in the era of the “Historical Sabbath” – the “End Times” when the Jews finally become the masters. (The Freemasonic calender Anno Lucius and the evangelical dispensionalist belief is also based on this.) But first there is a number of conditions that must be met (or created).

    One of the conditions is the death of the “mixed multitude” – Jews they consider fake, infected with gentile cooties or treasonus self hating Jews. According to various speculations, a large number of Jews had to perish in God’s cleasning fire, before the Historical Sabbath.
    Zechariah 3:18 claim that two thirds must die. (10 million Jews, at the turn of the century, minus 6 is rougly 2/3s, I guess.) There’s also a talmudic speculation about how there will be 600 000 Jews “missing” at the return to Judea. Perhaps, somehow, this turned into 6 million, through cabbalistic gematria. Who knows what their “brilliant” rabbis came up with in 1800s Pale of Settlement, when the paranoia was at it’s peak, after they killed the Tsar.)

    This is obviously not talked about openly, but there is one case where it was said out loud; the lubavitcher “Messiah” Schneerson, said that “THE HOLOCAUST WAS A SURGICAL PROCEDURE.” (See Yehuda Bauers’ article “God as Surgeon”.) The Mixed Multitude is about as hated as the Amalakites and has to be removed, like gangrene, before returning.

    Likewise, at the Holocaust Rememberence Day “celebration”, some Jews have a ritual based on Elie Wiesels book “Six Days of
    Destruction”, symbolizing the 6 milliennia before the historical sabbath. From Jewishvirtuallibrary:

    “In 1988 the Reform movement published Six Days of Destruction. This book, co-authored by Elie Wiesel and Rabbi Albert Friedlander, was meant to be viewed as a “sixth scroll,” a modern addition to the five scrolls that are read on specific holidays. Six narratives from Holocaust survivors are juxtaposed to the six days of creation found in Genesis.”

    Elie Wisels book “Night” in and of itself indicates a religious belief in a sacrifice in fire – its about as fiery as Isaiah’s prophesy. (And the gas chambers was non existant until they popped up in the german translation years after.)

    They are involved in a psychotic historical theatre play, where they must act out and declaim the script before their gods, for it to become realized.

    I imagine the ADL view this as the core of the anti-semitic secret conspiracy theory, but if they really want to keep it a secret, they probably shouldn’t publish it in the worlds most read book, and base their entire religion on it.

    As Israel Shahak described in his book “Jewish History, Jewish Religion”- this is the true Jewish (pseudo-) religious belief, closely guarded, and only talked about in convoluted ways. My head starts to ache just a few pages into their books, and what’s above is about all I know.
    It would be interesting if an academic of MacDonalds or Daltons caliber would make a deep dive into this, to see what they could find.

    • Carolyn Yeager
      Carolyn Yeager says:

      For a deep dive into Jewish thinking that resulted in the “Holocaust”, go to https;// Scroll down to Archives on the left side and start reading from the beginning, July 2010. I wouldn’t expect you to read EVERYTHING, but just what most intrigues you. Elie Wiesel is among the most typical of Jews, so teaches us what a religious Jew really is. Lying (storytelling to them) is the most natural thing in the world. We cannot and should not try to accommodate these people into our societies. They are not like us.

        HUGO FUERST says:

        @ Carolyn Yeager
        Eli Wiesel is a “mountebank”. Who says so? Norman Finkelstein, another Jew.
        Israel is using The Holocaust to undermine anti-Zionism at the UN; see e.g. Tovah Lazaroff, “The Jerusalem Post”, January 6, 2022, online.

  8. Jan van Toch
    Jan van Toch says:

    Again and again it boils down to Magy, deception, press, oy veh vs Truth and Reality,
    up to this era of the killervirus and the Destruction of America and the world.
    Problem: the ‘virus’, reaction: fear, solution: the corporate clowns and the clowns of government.

    To illustrate the dialectic a cartoon titled SERVANTS OF THE JEWS (ZIONIST)

    Der Stuermer, october 1935:
    “Etnic Russian and Ukrainian businessman,
    in their suits and ties,
    struggle under hard labor,
    overseen by their Jewish-Bolshevist task master.
    A similar fate awaits Europe,
    should the Soviets prevail.
    from Dalton/Pan Juadah p90

    Editor Julius Streicher was hanged, as was Alfred Rosenberg

  9. Reader
    Reader says:

    Maybe I’ll come back to this later, but I stopped reading when Italy was included on the side of Germany and Austria/Hungary.

  10. Anthony Kimball
    Anthony Kimball says:

    Someday, provided that the white race (what’s left of it) does the right and correct thing by having as many children as is humanly possible (with the appropriate racial counterparts, of course) and inculcates, indoctrinates and educates them to THE HILT in all matters racial, spiritual and historical so that after a couple of centuries there will be, as a result, a vast number of racially-aware and physically and mentally capable fighters ready and able (unlike our people in current year) to RECLAIM the land which was once ours, we will show these vile lying bastards exactly what a REAL holocaust looks like, tastes like, and feels like. Indeed, before we end them entirely, we will give them something truly worthy of all the bitching and moaning their media has saturated us with for more than a century.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      …” the right and correct thing by having as many children as is humanly possible “…

      The more numerous actual herds of sheep become the more numerous the wolf predators become . It is called a balance of nature ; or the way God controls excess population growth for the purpose of merely smiting predators .

  11. Curmudgeon
    Curmudgeon says:

    Thanks for the informative article. If I have a quibble, it would be that Mikhail Bakunin was more than an activist. He was a socialist and an anarchist more strident than the “father of anarchy” Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. Both detested Marx and his violent overthrow of governments doctrine. The early socialists were openly Auntie Shem-itic. In that context, it would seem unlikely “Narodnaya Volya, which included a few Jews” were truly anarchists, and more likely a front for the activist Jews.

  12. Hans
    Hans says:

    Just to make things clear, Italy was a member of the triple alliance but fought Germany and Austria-Hungary. Their biggest ally was the Ottoman Empire (Turkey).

    • charles frey
      charles frey says:

      Napoleon also had problems remembering Italy’s policies. Well before the period discussed here, he said : ” Italy never finishes a war on the same side as it started it, excepting when it changed sides twice ! “

  13. Bobby
    Bobby says:

    Thank you Thomas. Great information here.

    You know, what it comes down to, is that the biggest hoax the Jews played on us seems to be this one. It is the basis for keeping us Goyim in eternal guilt prison and in fear of criticizing the “poor Jews,” who have been “persecuted by the evil white race since time began.”

    If you read Kevin’s, “A People That Shall Dwell Alone,” the intricate workings of a fierce and strict group evolutionary strategy that they have practiced for thousands of years, and Ezra 9:2; just those things,

    “For they have taken their daughters for themselves, and for their sons: so that the holy seed have mingled themselves with the people of those lands: yea, the hand of the princes and rulers hath been chief in this trespass.”

    The ‘holy seed?!’

    You realize it’s the ultimate Jewish satanic inversion. They’re the Nazis’ and of course pinned it on us like they do with all of the rest of their Jewish supremacy.

    • Carolyn Yeager
      Carolyn Yeager says:

      There it is again. ‘The Jews are the “real” Nazis.’ Who were the Nazis? It’s a street-name applied to the National Socialists by their enemies. What is a Nazi? From the context of your comment, you think a Nazi is a radical racial-ethnic supremacist.

      The National Socialists had the same attitude toward their race-ethnicity as does Kevin MacDonald and most of the Euro-American/Canadian readers of TOO toward theirs. You should try to keep that in mind.

      • Bobby
        Bobby says:

        Yes Carolyn. We are in agreement and you are correct about the ‘Nazis’ and I assume, ‘most’ TOO readers. I do not think that the National Socialists who came to power in Germany in 1936, were radical racial ethnic supremacists. Some were. But there is always ‘some,’ in any human group population.

        I was using the term Nazi to make a point and I should have, like you, used the adjective “real,” when referring to who the ‘Jewish created image of Nazis,’ really are.

        While we’re on the subject, one of my favorite books on who the German National Socialists were is Richard Tedor’s, “Hitler’s Revolution.” It’s great. Read it if you haven’t already.

        • Carolyn Yeager
          Carolyn Yeager says:

          “I was using the term Nazi to make a point …”
          You shouldn’t use the term Nazi at all. It’s an artificial, meaningless word with no connection to reality. You’re taking the easy way out by trying to turn the tables by simply calling the other “the real Nazis.” Adding ‘real’ doesn’t make it right. Jews have been violent & disagreeable supremacists going back thousands of years. The only thing they accept is to be allowed to do what they want. They won’t be deterred!

          Yes, I’ve read Tedor’s book and agree it’s very well done, and also needed. I do have some disagreement with his last chapter, though. His criticism that Hitler was too harsh in his treatment of the Slavic East — Poland, Russia, Ukraine, et al — doesn’t sufficiently take in the realities of the loyalty or capabilities that could be expected from those nationals, who had to be financed by Germany, with all German supplied weapons & uniforms. Germany was far from having unlimited funds. There were many, many pitfalls (some of which did manifest) and Hitler was stretched to the limit. Armchair generals never have to face up to the results of their armchair decisions.

          I did some podcasts on this (Hitler & the Slavs). I also have a book on Hitler (with W.L. Kriessmann) titled “The Artist Within the Warlord: An Adolf Hitler you’ve never known,” available from all booksellers, which focuses more on the war years.

    • Wayne Lusvardi
      Wayne Lusvardi says:

      Truth comes in layers, many of them hidden and even each layer hiding another layer. Perhaps the biggest layer of the Holocaust is a cover up of the Allied (mostly American) war crimes. Eisenhower singularly put 1.5 million German soldiers in an encampment on the Rhine River and merely left them to starve to death. But that paled in comparison to the fire bombing of 60 German cities with massive civilian deaths (fire bombing was as devastating as an A-bomb).

      Then there are stories of what happened at Dachau: American soldiers who first arrived at the camp saw stacks of naked bodies piled up and assumed the German guards murdered them all. So they line the guards up against a wall and shot them all without any tribunal. But the deaths were caused mainly by typhus and the bodies were without clothes so as not to spread the disease. The typhus was the result of saturation bombing of water works, farms, railroads and industries that left Germans starving and diseased, including those in the concentration camps.

      In Eastern Germany I don’t think it is an exaggeration that every woman and female child was raped by the Russian Army. I have seen film some of the women who survived this, all bloodied, bruised and with black eyes from being beaten in the face.

      The Holocaust serves a social function of covering up American war crimes, and is not merely a partial and overblown fiction that serves to exaggerate J victimhood. To reveal the truth of the Holocaust is to cast light on not only war crimes but the legitimacy of fighting the war in the first place.

      The FDR administration in the 1930’s to 1940’s was run by Communists (Alger Hiss, the Rosenberg’s, Henry Wallace, and on and on). So, what winning the war over Germany meant was the ascendency of Communism, which makes sense from the Communist coup that ran American government at that time.

      Moreover, Hitler reportedly imprisoned one of the Rothchild’s and recovered huge sums from his bank.

      So, some 75 years later America is ironically fighting the same forces that Hitler was: Communism and banking oligarchs. Reaping what one sowed.

      • Lucy Lipinska
        Lucy Lipinska says:

        In Poland they have the word for holocaust is “zaglada”, which in Polish means “extermination”. According to the in Poland prevailing outlook, at least half of the exterminated proverbial six million were ethnic Poles. I have yet not run into, either in person or on social media, a single one Pole that would distrust the anti-German version of the past. The view that reigns supreme in all kinds of media – and history books – is that the Germans had planned to exterminate the Polish nation, which they allegedly regarded as untermensch. Even those few Poles who aren’t totally brainwashed have bought the anti-German narrative. The holocaust was, unsurprisingly, thoroughly sanctified by the (((Polish pope))) John Paul II/Karol Wojtyla Katz. The in social media now spread outlook is that the German Nazi have collaberated with the Jewry during WWII and continue doing that with the European Union as a tool.
        What I, who actually grew up in Poland under the “dictatorship of the proletariat”, find especially weird is the in Poland fast growing agressiveness towards the Russians, not only in MSM. I have the other day, under the phone conversation with my pious Catholic syster, learned that the
        Russian people always have been enemies of Poles, just like the “barbarian” Germans. Even though Ukraine is distrusted as governed by “nazi”, Poland’s authorities shout them hoarse, defending Ukraine from the “fascist” Russia.

        • Lucy Lipinska
          Lucy Lipinska says:

          To Lucy Lipinska
          The very old photo has followed my comment by misstake. I simply am illiterate when it comes to IT-skills. I will ask my son for help.

          • Peter
            Peter says:

            Thank you for those comments. Unfortunately, I’m not surprised. The rest of eastern Europe is not much better. They have all been indoctrinated with an extremely one sided, biased view of history, a history filled with lies. So many things that are said are so stupid, such as Ukraine being governed by “NAZIS” when their current President is Jewish and the previous President was part Jewish and the leading role Jews play in Ukraine. They dominate it and they have instilled their version of history on all of Eastern Europe since 1991. The Eastern Europeans are taught that the Germans were the worst but each eastern European nation is also guilty of murdering Jews. This is what the Jews instilled in Europeans, while whitewashing their monstrous role in communism.

            Yes, Poles can get away with that kind of thinking because even though large numbers of people in the USSR welcomed German troops as liberators (Estonia, Latvia, in Belarus, Ukraine and Russia too) the liars writing the history books ignore this as evidence the Germans were not beasts, but wanted good relations with those they were occupying, opening churches, etc., while the Red Army raped millions of Germans and other eastern Europeans too. Maybe not Poles though, I don’t know. But the Germans can not be seen as “liberators” so they are slandered so much so that even those that favored them over the Russians are equivocal when describing their relation to German troops. I’m in Estonia now and I can attest to that. Some older folks are very pro-German, the younger people have all been taught what the word “Holocaust” means since 1991, thanks to the Jews no doubt.

            This is a review of a new book from the Norwegian academic Johannes Due Enstad. Many Russians hoped that Hitler would free them from Stalin.


            I think that if a group of revisionist historians could be gathered with some thinkers like some of the people that write for this website (experts that write about the Jews) and they would be invited to eastern European universities by like minded professors there, those could be great events and spread some truth.

            I think you are a smart and decent person and I met a friendly young Polish guy when I was visiting eastern Germany a few years ago (I suspect that Poles that work or visit Germany are friendlier) but I have no problem hating any Pole as much as they hate me or Germans. Unlike other Germans, I do not feel I owe anyone anything. Indeed, Germany lost 1/3 of its territory as a result of the world wars.

            I see Germany’s relationship to Poland as similar to Russia’s relationship to Latvia and Estonia.

  14. Adûnâi
    Adûnâi says:

    > “In September 1919—less than one year after the war—the New York Times was reporting on renewed mass Jewish suffering, now in Poland and Ukraine.”

    This terrible article in a nutshell. The war was in full swing – the Russian Civil War.

    > “We charge the Russian Government with responsibility for the Kishineff massacre. We say it is steeped to the eyes in the guilt of this holocaust. (16 May, p. 1)”

    Meanwhile, Wikipedia: “The first recorded use of the term holocaust in its modern sense was in 1895 by The New York Times to describe the massacre of Armenian Christians by Ottoman forces.”

    > “And in case we had forgotten, the Times would soon remind us that, indeed, this horrific situation constituted…a holocaust.”

    …No? Basic reading comprehension suggests the “world holocaust” referred to the general conflagration of the Great War.

    > “The new campaign is the largest ever undertaken by Jews of the United States. … Dr. Judah Magnes has been enabled [to ascertain] the present needs of the Jewish people in Europe, who have fallen under the blight of the world holocaust. (29 October, p. E9)”

    And after that, there was undeniable suffering in the Russian Civil War which killed about 10 million people.Obviously, the American Jews were talking about Russo-Polish Jews in an apocalyptic fashion. Nowhere does it say the Jews specifically were aimed at extermination. Basic historical erudition seems to be too much to ask.

    Overall, the 6 million figure obviously refers to the general population number of Jews in the Orient of Europe, mainly in the lands of the partitioned Poland and Lithuania. It boggles my mind how anyone could be surprised at this. And the beginning of the article effectively admits this much! I’m bewildered. Apparently, Americans fear geography as much as the demon fears holy water.

    The word “holocaust” on its own was chosen by chance and consensus. Why not hecatomb? Hecatomb has been forgotten, holocaust won out. No deeper meaning.

  15. donna sherwood
    donna sherwood says:

    most risible of comments in this article regards the lack of any records about the slaughter. Sardonically hilarious. Is it possible one can pen something like this and have no working knowledge of the nuremberg trials or eichmann in jerusalem ? In both ,as well as in many other less famous legal cases, one of the aspects stunning the participants and observers was the meticulous record keeping skills of the germans.It is instructive that NOT ONE of these defendants denied the events only that they were without choice as military officers in discharging them. Hannah Arendt called them “desk murderers” schreibtischtater. I wonder of the age of author and commentators as any person in my demographic living in NYC likely knew survivors of this catastrophe. It was not uncommon in the 60s and 70s in summer months to see women in short sleeves with a number tattoo on their lower arm. Now it may be the height of fashion cool in our time to ink one’s body but in those days it was not done. Growing up I knew a great many jews in city and NOT one were unaffected by the Shoah through the loss of family My husband’s closest friend was an international opera singer who saw his 5 sisters and parents shot in front of him upon arriving at a camp My father was an infantryman battle hardened from Normandy to the battle of the bulge to the liberation of some of these non existent camps. It certainly would have startled him to be told he could not believe the evidence of his “lying eyes” of the crematoria and “delousing” stations. He was so shaken by this experience he almost killed a german officer in a POW camp who he saw slap a german corporal troubling his conscience up to his death. At the first one he said all he could think was “somebody has gone mad here”. His battalion had a young jewish physician attached to it who had a psychotic break seeing the conditions and had to be hospitalized. One can also read the wikipedia entry for british actor Dirk Bogarde who served in the british infantry where an excerpt from his memoirs is cited describing what he experienced liberating a “non existent” camp. He never got over it every single name memorialized at Yad Vashem has been thoroughly investigated for authenticity. Now one may, as this author among others on this site, claim they deserved it but this was a slaughter of almost unprecedented magnitude. If nothing else youtube runs a series easily accessed by now very elderly survivors. Eisenhower ordered that german civilians in areas around camps be forced to take a “tour” due to his concern that as time went on people would appear and attempt to deny it ever occurred Prescient. I thoroughly resent the oversized influence of secularized jews in the west in the undermining of the mores of our culture but do not sanction wholesale slaughter of women and children in atrocious manners as a justifiable policy. I do not understand what they seek to achieve the only plausible theory I have seen is that of e michael jones in his jewish revolutionary spirit. It is an impulse defying any rationality.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      So you just bumped into women with tatoos in NYC in the 60’s, this means they were killed in the holo-hoax? Sorry, I don’t get that.
      The Germans were so efficient, they could organise transports of Jews from all over continental Europe to pre-built camps, but not so efficient they could manage to kill them once they arrived?
      Either the Germans were efficient or they weren’t. Either they were sadistic killers or they weren’t. One or the another please. Not both.
      You don’t even know your own hoax, British or Americans never liberated any death camps, they don’t claim to. All the ‘death camps’ with the electric floors, masterbation machines, cages with eagles & bears, magic walls that bent shotguns, pits of Jews spouting ‘geishers’ of blood, these were all conveniently hidden behind the iron curtain.
      But I will give you this: I’m sure when Israel illegally kidnapped Eichmann to put him before a Jewish judge with Jewish lawyers in front of Jewish TV cameras, I’m sure all this was all entirely fair and above board. I’m just surprised he wasn’t found not guilty.

  16. Chaim McNoseberg
    Chaim McNoseberg says:

    Jewdea dictates world trade leader Amazon what they are “allowed to do” and/or “should be forbidden”.

    Their approved and notorious method to make themselves popular with the international community of subhuman goys. (Those who claim that Jews have too much influence and power or are too arrogant and hypocritical are also just evil anti-Semites!)

  17. Edward Harris
    Edward Harris says:

    30?40?50?60?million East Europeans of the Christian Faith were murdered by East Europeans of the Jewish Faith. Later, 6 million East Europeans of the Jewish Faith were murdered by East Europeans of the Christian Faith.
    Less than 1 million real Jews, probably less than 100,000 real Jews were murdered.
    Nearly all of today’s so called Jews consist of people descended from East Europeans converted to Judaism in the Middle Ages, according to the Jew side of my family.
    Some of my family were Rabbis who would never carry out conversions and believed that they should never happen.


  18. Lucius Vanini
    Lucius Vanini says:

    WOW, if this ain’t the kayo punch, though the narrative is in all other respects so weak I guess it was already on the canvas.

    And now pathological liars are still milking it–e.g., through the so-called International Fellowship of Christians and [really FOR] Jews, they’re on television raking in donations from Christian dupes, ostensibly to feed “Holocaust survivors” low on grub. Every evening that I look at Fox News I see their loathsome spot (which features Christian snake-oil peddler, G. Robertson); and I sometimes call that telephone number on the screen and say–

    “This is my donation: get a pen and paper; write down these names. ‘Mark Zuckerberg, Sergey Brin, Larry Page.’ These men are Social Media moguls and Jewish, and what they make in a week will provide these poor Jews of yours with Volga caviar and Dom Perignon for the rest of their lives. You might give those three fellows a call. Uh, by the way, does any of the charity go the other way, or is your organization actually the International Fellowship of Christians FOR Jews?”

    –posing that question in full knowledge of the facts.

    Now, not to suggest that Dalton’s essay is anything except extremely valuable, but I was surprised at its including Italy in the Central Powers “For the majority of this time [1914-1918].” My belief is that, while Germany and Austria did expect Italy to come in their side, Italy turned coat almost at the outset; and I remember that Hitler in MEIN KAMPF said it had been naive of Germany and Austria to think Italy would be an ally, given the level of Italian resentment toward Austria which had rather heavy-handedly occupied Italy in the 19th C.

    My grandfather Lotario Tesi was an officer in the Great (shameful) War, and all his foes were Austrians and Deutschlanders. A very belligerent type, he was wounded five times on the Isonzo Front, kept on rushing back to it after each convalescence. Was made a prisoner by the German army (no doubt at Caporetto in 1917) and wounded in the POW camp too, getting a German bayonet in the ribs after insulting a prison guard. But for some reason they freed him and he returned to action against Austria, which finally succumbed to the last Italian offensive, in 1918.

    So from personal sources very close to me I’ve always known that Italy was mainly a foe of what the piece above calls the “Triple Alliance,” not an ally.

  19. Bozworth
    Bozworth says:

    “And furthermore, why isn’t the figure of six million, first reported back in 1890, growing any larger?”. I would say: Why is the figure not growing smaller if the persecuted population of six million is indeed being subjected to “systematic and murderous extermination”, one would expect this number to decrease rather rapidly.

  20. Greg Bacon
    Greg Bacon says:

    Tell me how did the Nazis gas/murder then cremate/bury 11 million ppl in a little over 40 months? The six millino Juden plus the 5 million Gentiles who seem to have been forgotten.
    I say 40 months because that starts the time in 1942 when the Germans, who had made a deal with German Jewry in 1933 to move that troublesome race to Palestine. Which they did from 1933-42, when they had to break the agreement & focus those resources on the Eastern Front.

    So we’re supposed to believe the Nazis murdered, then disposed of over 270,000 corpses each and every month for 40 months, at the same time they were in a death battle on the Eastern Front, fighting the Allies in N Africa, then in Italy and also then in France & yet they still had the resources to kill & dispose of over 270,000 ppl per month at the same time that the massive IG Farben complex Monowitz was making synthetic fuel from coal–look up Monowitz, it was adjacent to Auschwitz & required thousands of workers around-the-clock which they got from??? Take a guess.

  21. Armoric
    Armoric says:

    Beginning of the article: ** I take it that the reader is familiar with the basics of the so-called Holocaust: (…) some six million Jews, many in gas chambers (…) This was, we are told, a deliberate policy of Hitler and his top men, something of highest priority—even above the war effort itself—and a policy of the utmost secrecy. It was so secret, in fact, that hard documentation and forensic evidence on this catastrophic, world-changing event are almost nonexistent **

    End of the article: ** We can also plausibly infer that the claimed ‘six million’ figure of World War II did not come from a body count—it didn’t—but rather is a symbolic number (…) As an actual death toll, it could be far removed from reality. / And if all this is true, then there are profound consequences. First (…) ; second (…) ; and third, we need to recompensate Germany, Switzerland, Belgium, and all those who were extorted into paying billions in “reparations” to Israel and global Jewry. **

    Even if six million Jews had died in gas chambers, the remaining Jews would still need to pay us back a few billion dollars. The story used to be that every crime committed by the Germans had been meticulously registered by a super-efficient, inhumane, remorseless, smooth-running administration.

    But now, it’s supposed to have been a super-secret operation carried out by about fifty super-efficient Germans. Or was it 500 Germans? It cannot be much more, since not a single one of them left any testimony, not even posthumously. It means the 90 million Germans and Austrians knew nothing about it and were guilty of nothing. Their support for the National Socialist party had nothing to do with an inclination for mass murder. They should not have paid any reparations.

    It’s not like communism. In the 1930s, the newspapers published a few articles on the atrocities committed in the USSR. The Jewish communists in the West knew all this and were largely complicit.

    Today, Jewish power is deliberately destroying us, but we cannot denounce it publicly, since that would be antisemitic. We are not even allowed to name individual Jews who work to destroy the White race, even if we omit to mention their ethnicity. On the other hand, it’s acceptable to blame all of Germany for secret mass murders.

    We’re told that there are good Jews, but we see that the Jews, in every Western country, have generated a network of activists who have infiltrated the institutions and are working to destroy us. It’s obvious to me that Jewish communities as a whole are deeply involved in those genocidal efforts.

    Similarly, Jewish hatred of Whites was an essential component of communism in Russia. That’s what led to the bloodshed. And it didn’t just come from the top of the Jewish hierarchy. It was part of the Jewish culture. On the other hand, I guess most Germans who applauded Hitler didn’t have strong opinions about Jews.

    Also, the Jews were responsible for getting Britain, France and the USA into WW2. I don’t know much about French politics in the 1930s, but my guess is that Jews like Léon Blum, Georges Mandel, Pierre Mendès France, Jean Zay, Jules Moch, and all the Licra activists, must have played a leading role, as did the Jewish press. They wanted war with Germany because Hitler was dismantling Jewish power.

    Spain and Ireland stayed out of WW2 and suffered about zero casualty. France could have done the same. It would have saved the lives of 500.000 French people. And it would have made it more difficult for England, and then the USA, to take part in the war on Germany. The living conditions in German concentration camps would have been greatly improved.

    The Jews won’t even say publicly that the 6 million gas chambers were a secret operation. They only say it if they are pushed into a corner. In most Western countries, it is against the law to contradict them about WW2, but the law doesn’t even list the facts we are not allowed to dispute. I wonder if the official Jewish theory is that their 6 million death toll was caused by WW2. If so, they were wrong to start it in the first place.

    The Jews claim they can read the minds of White people. Did they read in Hitler’s mind that he planned to kill them all, in war or even in peace? I bet he would have liked to send them all to Madagascar.

    If Europe, from Brittany to the Urals, had expelled all its Jews in 1900, when there were only about 2 million inhabitants on the island of Madagascar, it would have saved the lives of 50 million White people, not to mention the 6 million. But the Jews think they have a God-given right to live among us. What is 50 million people? It was worth it, as Madeleine Albright would say.

    • Armoric
      Armoric says:

      Bogus collective accusations against the Germans are okay, but naming Soros is antisemitic. Anyway, you don’t have to name Soros. Just ask who owns the media, who controls the government, who it is you cannot criticize… We know who it is! Unfortunately, those antisemitic questions are no longer allowed in France. It’s still okay to ask what, when, and where, but not who.

      It started in January 2021, when retired general Delawarde wrote an article about the media mob that was going after Trump. He used the phrase “meute médiatique” to describe them. The word “meute” means a pack of dogs or wolves. A few months later, Delawarde was interviewed by a Jewish talking head on the heavily Jewish channel CNews, and repeatedly asked who was the media mob he was referring to. The CNews man kept frenetically asking QUI? (= WHO?).

      Then, the next month, in a street demonstration against the China virus tyranny, a young female teacher held a cardboard sign asking the same question: Who? On that sign were the names of 13 people, mostly politicians, 9 of them Jewish. It was a reference to the CNews interview of the retired general, and she was clearly drawing attention to the Jewish angle of the Covid tyranny. The next morning, she was surprised to find her picture and her name in all the newspapers. Government ministers were denouncing her on Twitter, and she was out of her job in the state education system.

      The police are now on the lookout for any sign asking the same question in anti-government demonstrations. Just this week, a man who took part in a demonstration last summer was also given a 3-month suspended sentence for pinning the word “Who?” to his T-shirt.

      It’s okay to make false collective accusations about who gassed 6 million Jews, but not to say the truth about who is pushing the Covid tyranny.

  22. Lucius Vanini
    Lucius Vanini says:

    Not that six million really died, whether through gas or any other method, but even if we grant them that number, the question that’s always occurred to me and I’ve often posed, is “The lowest estimated number of WWII deaths is 55 million: WHY are 6 million of them so much more important than the other 49 million?”

    The reason of course is professional victimhood. In effect, Jews beat their chests and sob effeminately, “We have suffered more than anyone–you OWE us special consideration and special concessions!” They’ve largely cornered the victimization market, though blacks, often with their help for not unselfish reasons, also profit from professional victimhood. Now, White non-Jews can’t be victims at all!

    That of course has been one of their main strategies–making a gold mine out of tales of suffering. Also, there’s something from them that’s gotten into the Western psyche through the importation of Judaism for the goyim: the infamous non sequitur that suffering makes holy. LOL to the adherents of that psychopathological cult, even GOD must suffer, and does on the cross; and his suffering is the holiest of things!

Comments are closed.