Jewface and the Under-Race: Inferior Whites Cannot Play Roles Belonging to their Racial Superiors

If you want to understand the leftists of the twenty-first century, you won’t find a better guide than a writer who died more than seventy years ago. George Orwell (1903–50) exposed the psychology and tactics of leftism in his two greatest books. In Nineteen Eighty-Four (1948), he satirized the way leftists practise the opposite of what they preach: “The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation.”

Preaching equality, practising hierarchy

And in Animal Farm (1945), he satirized the dishonesty and deceit of leftist rhetoric: “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.” In other words, Orwell saw that leftists are not serious about the sacred leftist principle of equality. It is merely a slogan, a rhetorical smoke-screen beneath which they advance towards their real aims: privilege for their favoured groups, enslavement for their enemies. In 2022 a leftist children’s writer called Jacqueline Wilson has adapted Orwell’s joke from Animal Farm. But Wilson is perfectly serious when she makes one of her female characters say: “In the modern world girls are just as clever as boys, and sometimes cleverer.”

In other words, men and women are equal, but women are more equal than men. The same applies to Whites and non-Whites. In leftism, all races are equal, but some races are more equal than others. That is, some races are superior to others. Or rather, all races are superior except one. Whites are now cast in the role of under-race and portrayed as the greatest villains, thieves and exploiters in history, sickeningly and supremely responsible for the horrors of racism, slavery and genocide. That’s why White actors are now banned from taking any non-White role, while non-Whites are free to take any White role they please. It’s a question of racial privilege, something that leftists claim to oppose but in fact wish to re-create and reinforce. This time, however, Whites are on the bottom of the racial hierarchy.

Transgenderism is good, transracialism is bad

That’s why it’s very interesting that some Jews are now calling for an end to “Jewface,” or the casting of White actors in Jewish roles. The term “Jewface” is an adaptation of “blackface,” which referred to the way White actors blackened their faces to play Black characters. For example, the British actor Laurence Olivier (1907-89) used blackface in his acclaimed performance as the traditionally Black protagonist of Shakespeare’s play Othello (c. 1603). Olivier triumphed in many Shakespearean roles and is still widely regarded as the greatest actor of modern times. But none of that—his prodigious talent, his praeternatural charisma, his passionate devotion to Shakespeare—matters any more. Olivier’s blackface Othello is now regarded as an abomination that must never be repeated.

But leftists don’t explain exactly why White actors are now banned from Black roles, just as they don’t explain why transgenderism is good, while transracialism is bad. For leftists, men can literally become women by proclaiming that they are so, but Whites cannot become Blacks by proclaiming that they are so. Why the difference? I think I’ve explained it in articles like “Power to the Perverts!” and “The Tyranny of Translunacy.” It’s a question of higher and lower status within leftism. Those belonging to a group with higher status can invade the territory of a group with lower status, but not vice versa. Transwomen—the variously disturbed and perverted men who claim to be women—have cleverly marketed themselves as a persecuted and vulnerable minority akin to homosexuals. They therefore have higher status in leftism than the ordinary women whose territory they want to invade.

Disassociating Jews from the “white under-race”

But “transblacks”—those Whites who claim to be Black—cannot market themselves as of higher status than Blacks. They’re White and therefore belong to an under-race with the lowest status of all. That’s why leftists anathematize White-to-Black transracialism. Whites cannot invade Black territory, because Whites are inferior to Blacks. However, Blacks can invade White territory whenever they please, therefore Black actors can take any White role. A Black actress has played the White queen Anne Boleyn; Black actors have played White heroes like Achilles and Galahad; and the heavily promoted Netflix series Bridgerton has filled early nineteenth-century England with elegant and intelligent Black aristocrats. What’s forbidden for Whites is celebrated for Blacks. Leftists don’t openly explain why this double-standard exists, because they don’t want to admit that they’re creating a racial hierarchy with Whites at the bottom. If they admitted that, they would alert ordinary Whites to the worse things that lie ahead. Leftists want to enslave ordinary Whites and leave them completely at the mercy of increasingly vicious and resentful non-White criminals.

Maureen Lipman plays an oppressed minority

I think that’s why some Jews are now campaigning against “Jewface.” They want to disassociate Jews from the White under-race and establish Jews openly as a privileged non-White minority, allied with the other minorities whom, in Jewish-leftist propaganda, Whites have oppressed so cruelly for so long. In the UK, the Jewish actress Maureen Lipman has complained that the gentile actress Helen Mirren should not have played the role of the Jewish prime minister Golda Meir (1898–1978) in the forthcoming film Golda. Lipman says that Jewishness is “integral” to the role of Meir, therefore a gentile actress cannot authentically perform as Meir. What Lipman really means is that Jewishness is superior to goyishness, therefore an inferior goy should not take on the role of a superior Jew. The unfunny and physically repulsive Jewish comedian David Baddiel has supported Lipman in the Guardian, but he too has not admitted the real reason for his opposition to “Jewface”:

The deep truth of any marginalised identity is only available to those who live that identity. Casting a non-minority actor to mimic that identity feels, to the progressive eye, like impersonation, and impersonation may carry with it an element of mockery—or at least seem reductive, reducing the complexity of that experience by channelling it through an actor who hasn’t lived it.…

Jewish is the minority that you can cast with actors not of that minority, and hardly, until very recently, hear a whisper of concern. … [This issue is] about the idea that minority experience should be expressed by those who truly know it, rather than caricatured by those who don’t. It would be an interesting conclusion, given 2,000 years of persecution, that the representation of Jewish identity doesn’t deserve this complexity. …

In all the aggressive tweeting about Lipman, I saw many photos posted triumphantly of when she once played a vicar in a TV show. Social media loves of course an Aha! meme, and those who hated Lipman for saying her Golda Meir thing posted it luxuriously, as if it proved her bang-to-rights wrong. But minority casting is not a two-way street. Dev Patel can play, obviously, all the south Asian parts he gets offered, and he can also now play [the white role of] David Copperfield. (‘Why don’t Jews play Jews?’—David Baddiel on the row over Helen Mirren as Golda Meir, The Guardian, 12th January 2022)

Note that Baddiel thinks Jews have suffered “2,000 years of persecution.” His anti-Christian bigotry is showing, because “persecution” of Jews—that is, justified gentile responses to Jewish misbehavior—is far older than Christianity, as Andrew Joyce has described in articles like “Exodus Redux: Jewish Identity and the Shaping of History.” Now look at Baddiel’s argument for banning Whites from non-White roles: “The deep truth of any marginalised identity is only available to those who live that identity.” He claims that when a profane White plays a sacred non-White, the performance is “reductive, reducing the complexity of [non-white] experience by channelling it through an actor who hasn’t lived it.” There is no “deep truth” or “complexity” to White identity and experience, you see. Whites are one-dimensional, banal and boring compared to complex, highly intelligent and endlessly creative Blacks and other non-Whites.

“Color-blind” means “anti-white”

But we Whites have pretended otherwise in our literature and theatre, creating some very flattering and interesting characters and roles for ourselves. Now it’s time for those juicy roles to go where they really belong: to non-Whites. That’s why, as Baddiel described, the South Asian actor Dev Patel can play the Dickens character David Copperfield, but no White actor can play a South Asian role. Patel himself has said that “Dickens is a truly universal story” and that no-one should object to his “color-blind” casting in the role, because “It’s just people playing people, like actors are meant to do.”

But Patel would not say that a White actor could be chosen to play a brown Indian character like Buddha or the Emperor Ashoka. Color-blind casting works only one way: actors from superior races can take the roles of characters from the inferior White under-race, but not vice versa. And David Baddiel, Maureen Lipman, Sarah Silverman and some other Jews want Jews to be added to the list of roles forbidden to Whites. They can see where cultural trends are heading and want to disassociate Jews from the White under-race. Interestingly, Golda Meir’s own grandson, Shaul Rahabi, doesn’t agree with them. He has said that “I have no issue with Helen Mirren being Jewish or not Jewish playing my grandmother. It doesn’t matter at all. I’m sure Helen Mirren is great.”

Meir’s grandson is an Israeli and lives in Israel, where “whiteness” is prized among Ashkenazi Jews because it separates them not just from Arabs but also from dark-skinned Mizrahi Jews, whom the Israeli prime minister David Ben Gurion (1886-1973) “didn’t want” in the country. As I described in my article “Efface the Facts,” Jewish advertisements sometimes represent Ashkenazim with pale skin, blue eyes and goyish features.

Anti-White hate will worsen

As ever, it comes down to that simple question of “What’s best for Jews?” In Israel, it’s good for Jews to claim “whiteness,” because there’s no competition from genuine Whites. In the West, it’s good for Jews to denigrate Whites, deny White achievements and cast Whites as history’s greatest and most incorrigible villains. This anti-White campaign has incited non-Whites to attack Whites even as those non-Whites are given special privileges in employment and law. Acting is one small but culturally significant part of this White dispossession. All White roles are now open to non-Whites, but Whites are banned from non-White roles.

It’s a blatant double-standard based on an implicit racial hierarchy that contradicts the explicit leftist principle of racial equality. Leftist Jews like Maureen Lipman and David Baddiel now want Jews to get the advantage of the double-standard too. They can see that the campaign of anti-White hate will only get worse. But as anti-White hate worsens, more and more White eyes will open. And among the things those eyes will see is the leading role of Jews in the ongoing war on Whites and Western civilization.

27 replies
    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      Maybe this is wrong, but I’ve never seen it demonstrated to be, but if anyone can explain why this isn’t correct, I’d be glad to hear it:
      Leftism just seems to me, to be the attack politics of Judaism. And Judiasm just seems to be basic Satanism.
      That’s why so much, nay all(?) of leftistsm is just an inversion of the truth, reality, beauty, goodness, gentleness, nature, etc. Satanism is at bottom inversion. Hence all their inverted symbols.
      Judaism, a demonic religion, is simply the cut-out linking them together.
      I really wish someone would explain that I have this all totally wrong, as I’d certainly sleep allot easier. . .

      • TJ
        TJ says:

        The ocean destroys sand castles, but without conscious intent. Imagine that the ocean acquired agency [free will] and could destroy with conscious intent. This is Satan, AFAIK. Sexual roles reversed. Why are females smaller and weaker and dumber? To block all the damage they could do If they possessed male skills and strength. Inverted thought is egalitarianism: from jew Natan Blumenthal [Nathaniel Branden]- “THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN IS THAT MEN CANNOT HAVE BABIES” Sheer insanity from Dr. Branden. I was a few feet from him when he said this. . .[NB was a long term associate of Ayn Rand. btw AYN in Hebrew means infinite nothingness, or sometimes it means God] The name Branden means Ben Rand- Son of Rand. circa 1971.

        What should be passive becomes active- Satan awakes. btw Branden had a book service which sold books from known communists such as Betty Friedan [a card carrying member of the Party] and Mortimer Adler, a commie from Aspen.

      • Sursumcorda
        Sursumcorda says:

        You’re exactly right, unfortunately. Judaism is satanism. They aligned themselves with Satan at the praetorium when they said “crucify Him!” They indeed are the synagogue of Satan.

    • Birhan Dargey
      Birhan Dargey says:

      I am UTTERLY confused. Multidiversity is “our” strengh..!!! Inclusion, we are going in full circles…NONjewish actors can not played jews, but jews can play nonjews.!!! Is Shakepeare alien to jewish/ness?? …This will become even more absurd..what about gays/lgbt/?? can they play non gays?? who/how/are they going to decide/assign roles?? I was somewhat surprise..On 2021 the current 21th century Steven Spielberg directed Westside Story about PRicans vrs Irish gangs in 1950s NYork..Hollywood could not find a Hispanic/Latino/PRican director????? I remember watching Exodus with Paul Newman..One day Pauls Character fiance comes to visit the family in Israel..Pauls Sister walks into the diningroom and looks at Pauls gentile fiance with DEEP hatred…envious of such gentile anglosaxon stunning BEAUTY..difficult to find among fullblooded female jews…ironically White jews treasure their whiteness that separates them from dark skinned jews…this is just weird..

  1. Peter
    Peter says:

    “All White roles are now open to non-Whites, but Whites are banned from non-White roles.” They are able to do this because minorities (most notably Jews) emphasize their separateness, that they are a distinct group, and have lobbies working for their interests and media they own only portraying themselves positively and historically as a victim. Whites, by contrast do not emphasize their separateness and when they do, they are called “racists”. I think before WW II Whites used to emphasize their separateness more. I think marrying a Jew at that time might have caused tension or conflict in more families than it does today but even marriage between Catholics and Protestants may have caused tension in some families. But the Jews have created a climate where they claim they always wanted to fit in with others but were rejected and now they emphasize their separateness (I think they always wanted to remain a distinct group) while if Whites behave they same way, they are called “White supremacists”.

    Regarding the term “White”, I think it is a term associated more with the US, Australia and Canada than Europe. Everyone in Europe was White and the issue confronting Europe was not race (except regarding Jews) but the conflicts between different nations that always existed. In the US, White is a useful term to distinguish Whites from the 10% Black population. Also, I think that many Europeans that came to the US took on a different mindset. Whereas, in Europe a German and Frenchman were both White (that was meaningless there), what separated them was their ethnicity and language but if those two met in the US those differences were not so important. Whites with different European ethnicities intermarried freely which probably has more to do with the fact that there is no border separating different ethnicities in the US.

    If Whites in the US are not able to demand the same treatment for themselves as every other group demands, the right to identify as a distinct and separate group, they will disappear. And of course the irony is that after the Jews pushed miscegenation and the idea that all people are the same regardless of race or religion, now their hypocrisy can be seen. They are powerful enough to now parade their Jewishness and call Whites “NAZIS” if they do the same thing. Similarly, in Europe if the different nations don’t demand their right to remain distinct (as Hungary is apparently doing) they will disappear as a distinct group too. The fact that most Europeans speak English I think makes it a real danger that this could happen someday.

  2. JM
    JM says:

    “As ever, it comes down to that simple question of “What’s best for Jews?” In Israel, it’s good for Jews to claim “whiteness,” because there’s no competition from genuine Whites. In the West, it’s good for Jews to denigrate Whites, deny White achievements and cast Whites as history’s greatest and most incorrigible villains (JM: because Whites are (still) the threatening majority).”

    Now that’s an original insight of the audacious and very true kind that Gilad Atzmon would make. In a nutshell: the origins of the “Whiteness” lie/subversion.

  3. kolokol
    kolokol says:

    “All races are equal, but some races are more equal than others.” That’s the essence of Critical Race Theory. CRT is Jewish construct, to swindle the masses. It was invented by Jews, as a weapon against Whites. Jewish slogans about “equality” conceal their supremacist agenda.

    David Baddiel exhibits a Jewish double standard. He says it’s OK for Jewish actors to play Whites characters, but Helen Mirren cannot play the part of Golda Meir, a Jew. There are some Whites (Eloi) who are dumb enough to accept David Baddiel’s BS.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      I not heard of Baddiel for years, I don’t watch pop culture anymore(it’s impossible), but growing up I remember him on a football chat show with Frank Skinner, this was where he made his name.
      Skinner was genuinely talented, most, including me, just presumed Baddiel was the straight man, until someone explained he was a comedian too. OK.
      That Baddiel was so accepted by football fans, the one group in British society if any that could possibly ly be antisemitic(of course they weren’t, just like everyone else), and he repays this generosity by ethnic agitation against his hosts as a mature adult. Every single time indeed.
      Good point about CRT, and BLM as well being totally Jewish groups, with black window dressing.
      I simply cannot understand how anyone could imagine American blacks could instigate the admittedly impressive shakedown of corporate America(& Britain, etc) that BLM pulled off.
      Considering what most non libtard whites think of blacks, how could they ever imagine this was blacks doing this?

  4. Bobby
    Bobby says:

    Thanks, Tobias. Very good stuff as always.

    I’m sure you’ve read; “Politics and the English Language.” If you haven’t, it’s a must read.

    Two of my favorite sentences are from ‘1984’.

    “Freedom is the freedom to say that 2+2=4. If that is granted, all else follows.” And;

    “It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen.”

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      I wasn’t that big a fan of 1984 because I felt that there was very little new in it, like I’d read it all before, as so much of that book is part of our cultural shared memory. Maybe I need to read it again, I wonder if anyone else felt this way.
      Animal Farm was better, I thought, very clever. But neither was as enjoyable as reading his journalistic essays, I thought.

  5. Swan
    Swan says:

    Fantastic article! There’s great talking points here that ever pro white should keep in their argumentative arsenal. That said, the utter chutzpah of this David Baddiel is astonishing. Jews,…marginalized…?, seriously???

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      Talking about chutzpah, Baddiel is another example of this in action when they try to claim physiognomy is pseudoscience. Although I accept, there’s very few Jews who don’t prove this point.

  6. Al Ross
    Al Ross says:

    I believe that the “Brown Indian Buddha” was actually an Aryan descended aristocrat from the far north of what we know today, thanks to Western cartographers , as India.

    Later , Gautama’s Aryan cognates bred with the natives.

    The corruption of Gautama’s austere atheistic belief , which we all know as being somewhat similar to that of Schopenhauer’s, but far more popular , was carried out by his successor Asian acolytes ( 18 different schools of them) , with the same predictable contamination and obfuscation which any student of early Christian history would smilingly recognize.

    A bleak Philosophy became a Religion replete with mendicant monks.

    Still , there is some hope :

  7. Fenria
    Fenria says:

    Jews cannot claim actual victimhood in any respect because they, themselves, wield outsized power within all of western society. Oh, the tangled web we weave when jews designate power as the pivotal reason why whites cannot claim victimhood, but end up having this same reasoning used against you, the most powerful group in the world, eh, jews? Funny how double standards crumble when applied, ain’t it.

  8. Pennslvania Chuck
    Pennslvania Chuck says:

    It’s really hard to open peopkes eyes to what is going on. And who is behind it. So many people I talk to tney are quick to feel a certain way about muslims, but just mention “jew” and their defenses go up. It’s like people have this idea a jew is like an abused child hiding in the corner. They can not connect anything evil happening in our culture to a jew. Sure they feel the muslim is a tnreat but a jew, no way. It’s really crazy. But then I think back and I was the same way just a few years ago.
    By the grace of God my eyes were open. And there’s a purpose. I’m just not completly sure yet. Yeah the individual reason I understand, but tnere must be more.
    I feel the persecution has started. Once external conflict gets resolved, tnen those ruling us will turn their complete attention inwards. Whites will be, tney are, first in line. Most like well be blamed for failing in our fight with Russia. Trump and all who followed him responsible for America’s failing as world leader.
    Whites may be first in line but nearly everyone is in line. Their time will come. I read Russian literature and some history, struggle to u derstand, but I believe what the Jews did to Russia and the Russian people, history will repeat itself in America. Dark days ahead.
    But that’s okay. The moral filth we’ve become has touched and dirtied us all to some extent. We must all go through the fire to ever hope to correct the future.
    Jews are always going to be opposed to everything good. The solution? Who knows. I think about what tned bible says, tney call themselves jews but are not. If there was away to separate the filth from the good, idk.
    Buckle up people. When beautiful and righteous Russia takes the recognized lead as the new world leader those ruling over us are going to be mean, hateful, vengeful beyound understanding. God have mercy on us all.
    And always remember God and righteousness prevails.
    God bless all God fearing people everywhere.

  9. Blenda Richter
    Blenda Richter says:

    “God is the immemorial refuge of the incompetent, the helpless, the miserable. They find not only sanctuary in His arms, but also a kind of superiority, soothing to their macerated egos; He will set them above their betters.

    Faith may be defined briefly as an illogical belief in the occurrence of the improbable.

    A man full of faith is simply one who has lost (or never had) the capacity for clear and realistic thought. He is not a mere ass; he is actually ill. Worse, he is incurable, for disappointment being essentially an objective phenomenon, cannot permanently affect his subjective infirmity. His faith takes on the virulence of a chronic infection. What he usually says in substance is this: ‘Let us trust in God who has always fooled us in the past.’

    It is impossible to imagine the universe run by a wise, just and omnipotent God, but it is quite easy to imagine it run by a board of gods. If such a board actually exists it operates precisely like the board of a corporation that is losing money.

    Heaven is a mythical place which people who have never been to it, brag about it to people who will never get there.

    We are here and it is now. Further than that all human knowledge is moonshine.” ― H.L. Mencken

    • charles frey
      charles frey says:

      ” His faith takes on the virulence of a chronic infection ! ”

      Pity, that Mencken lacked the opportunity to watch ” Lorelai Monesgutu journey, ROMANIA GOT TALENT ” on you tube.

      A thoroughly beautiful girl and individual, born without arms and with short stumps for legs. Abandoned by her mother at birth but taken in by another woman. She sings like an angel. She plays a key-board and the guitar with her toes.

      It’s unlikely she will ever know a man. From wherever she draws her strength for the following day has nothing to do with Mencken’s bullshit.

      I encourage all those who have experienced the onset of self pity to watch her performance. She sings in English; the Romanian language need not be familiar for the greater picture.

    • TJ
      TJ says:

      low iq

      To replace religion with objectivity, reason, and science would require a massive increase the world’s intellectual horsepower. It is written. . .

      • charles frey
        charles frey says:

        IQ has no relevance at the moment you stare death in its ominous face: close enough to smell its stinking, cold, accelerated breath.

        Or do you wish to imply, that a mother who just crashed her car, burning her three children in the back to death, will just reason the entire experience away with resignation, so long as she has a high IQ ?

  10. Jim Laffrey
    Jim Laffrey says:

    Only dupes think jews have hired Whites to play jews in the jew-owned entertainment propaganda industry. Only open jews and crypto-jews get the roles. The jews are only pretending that there is such a practice so that they have yet another false reason to whine against Whites and pretend there exists “White privilege.” Likewise, when they whine about the Oscars being “too White”! The Oscars are never White. They are always jews and other nonWhites. Likewise, only dupes think Biden and Trump are Whites. Sadly, “dupe” applies to 95% of our White population. I have presented the truth, with evidence, for more than a dozen years, yet most of our “Truth Movement” websites continue to profess their destructive, adamant ignorance.

Comments are closed.