Under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s federal regime, Canada has become a testbed or pilot program for the globalist experiment. Canada, like much of the Western World, has been under severe deconstructive challenge. All aspects of life have been subjected to a withering culture of critique. The new Canada that is emerging from the ruins of tradition is very much in line with the prototypical globalist program.
Klaus Schwab, the globalist founder of the World Economic Forum (WEF), essentially described the so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution and The Great Reset as the events that will lead to the abolition of private property and the establishment of a new world order. Free market capitalism will be dispensed with in favor of stakeholder capitalism, a system in which governments and central banks, beholden to the WEF, will dictate to citizens and private businesses what they should think, how they should behave, and what their priorities should be. In this dark future “you won’t be allowed to own any private property and your only recourse will be to live in a state of permanent dependency on a small number of rich elitists who own everything.”
The WEF has come to the fore of late because of brazen public statements by Klaus Schwab. In 2017, Schwab boasted, for instance, that almost the entire Canadian Cabinet was under the sway of the WEF as a vast number of its current composition was made up of former WEF young leaders. He proudly states that the WEF has “infiltrated” governments all over the world. Schwab explicitly mentions Canada: “I have to say, when I mention now names, like Mrs. (Angela) Merkel and even Vladimir Putin, and so on, they all have been Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum. But what we are very proud of now is the young generation like Prime Minister (Justin) Trudeau. … We penetrate the cabinet. So yesterday I was at a reception for Prime Minister Trudeau and I know that half of his cabinet, or even more than half of his cabinet, are actually Young Global Leaders.”
This raises some questions about how the WEF, an institution that citizens are not able to vote for, has had a disproportionate influence on the policies adopted by the Canadian government at every level. Although the WEF is but one of a vast constellation of globalist non-governmental organizations (NGOs), it is an insidious example of how globalist institutions, very much aligned with George Soros’ open borders ethos, can have a profound influence on the way we are governed.
A global system characterized by open borders, stakeholder capitalism, transhumanism, and a whole litany of other transformative measures as promoted by Mr. Schwab’s WEF, George Soros’ Open Society, and the Anglo-Jewish American ruling class, is already at work in the United States, Canada, Britain, the wider anglosphere—and throughout Europe. Scott Howard, in one of his meticulously substantiated articles, states that Mr. Schwab has been “at the nexus of much of the transhumanist-globalist Hivemind activity and its future direction, and it is worth looking more deeply at Schwab, the World Economic Forum, and the tentacle-like connections that span the globe with the aim of totally enveloping it.” Mr. Howard further states that the WEF’s partners and affiliates “include virtually every major player in not just the globalist agenda more broadly but who form the power nucleus of the dominant faction of transhumanists pushing the world in its current awful direction.”
Interestingly, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) seemingly endless eastward expansion brings with it the very same destructively transformative globalism. The current, ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine can be seen as the exemplification of a war between globalism and the nation-state. Globalists see “Putin as the symbol of white identity and populism in the world, and they want to knock Russia out of the world stage.” Incidentally, Larry Fink, CEO of the multi-trillion-dollar investment management corporation Blackrock, acknowledged Vladimir Putin’s Russia thwarting globalist designs. Mr. Fink stated that the Russian invasion of Ukraine “has put an end to the globalization we have experienced over the last three decades.”
It is telling and predictable, therefore, that Canada’s official stance vis-à-vis the Russia-Ukraine war is in lockstep with the globalist position: “Canada and Ukraine are steadfast partners and close friends. Alongside its international partners and allies, and in solidarity with the government and people of Ukraine, Canada unequivocally condemns Russia’s decision to recognize the independence of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in Ukraine. Russia’s action constitutes a brazen violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence, and demonstrates a blatant disregard for international law.”
In his examination of the ideas of George Soros and his mentor, Karl Popper, Historian Ricardo Duchesne states that “opposition to European ‘tribalism’ and ‘nationalism’ is the single most important aim and function of the Open Society Foundations.”
The great impediment to the globalist open society is any form of self-assertion by nations or peoples, especially White Europeans. Author Michelle Malkin, in Open Borders Inc, writes “Remember: national self-determination is the pesky ‘obstacle’ in the path to Soros’s open society.” [Michelle Malkin, Open Borders Inc., (Washington D.C.: Regnery, 2019), p.51] And the scale of this self-determination does not seem to matter to our hostile elites: whether it is Canadian Truckers, American patriots, or the Russian state, they are all viewed with hostility. The weapons used against these enemies only vary in degree. Self-assertion by the White majority population in Canada is dealt with in a variety of ways including mass migration, financial pressure, censorship, unpunished mass criminality, miseducation, physical/political violence, and mass media.
Political theorist Alexander Dugin similarly states that one of the tactics used to bring about The Great Reset is the “widespread use of “demonization,” “de-platforming,” and network ostracism (cancel culture) against all those who hold views different from the globalist one (both abroad and in the U.S. itself).”
Karl Haemers, in his article entitled “The not-so-friendly folks at the World Economic Forum,” states quite rightly that Chrystia Freeland is not only a WEF Board member, she is also currently the deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister of Canada. As Mr. Haemers points out, she negotiated major global oligarchic control “free trade” agreements such as the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) with the European Union, and the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement; Freeland also wrote a book entitled Plutocrats: The Rise of the New Global Super-Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else.
Miss Freeland’s status as a WEF board member has been written about in the Canadian mainstream press as well, albeit in a limited way. In an article appearing in the National Post in 2021, the writer emphasizes a glaring conflict of interest: Miss Freeland currently sits on the WEF board of trustees while still being deputy prime minister of Canada and minister of finance.
The WEF internal news has praised Canada’s generosity as far as refugee and immigrant acceptance is concerned. The utopian visions of refugees integrating seamlessly into Canada, however, is a deluded fantasy, a pipe dream. Many of those admitted at great cost to the Canadian taxpayer end up on the street, in shelters, and without the skills or means to enter the workforce. In a recent government report, it was shown that after 10 years of being in Canada 45 percent of refugees were on welfare.
In an article from 2018, the WEF praised Canada for its openness to international students from India: “With the US and the UK slowly shutting their doors, Canada has flung its open, and Indian students are rushing in. In 2017, Indian students who secured Canadian visas increased by almost 60% from a year ago, according to official data. In all, Indian students received 83,410 of the 317,110 Canadian study permits granted during the year.”
Both Mr. Trudeau and Ms. Freeland have mouthed WEF talking points while speaking publicly about how the Covid-19 pandemic has presented a tremendous opportunity to transform Canada. They are well on their way to ensuring perpetual electoral hegemony by importing a new electorate. There are many risks as screening safeguards were removed: those accused of terrorism, criminality, and other seditious offenses are able to maintain and even gain citizenship.
The media in Canada is also on the take: the mainstream media in Canada along with certain social media influencers have been bought and paid for. They operate as the mouthpiece for the current federal regime.
In its 2019 budget, the federal government rolled out nearly $600 million in subsidies for select media outlets that obtain the federal government’s approval. The latest $600 million cheque is meant to fill a blind spot in exerting government influence over the Canadian print and online media. … By handing nearly $600 million directly to select newspapers, the government isn’t doing anything new. It’s just extending the control that it had over other mediums, to traditional mainstream newspapers.
To dole out the cash, the Liberals created a handpicked panel, giving the bailout an appearance of distance from direct partisan intervention. Unsurprisingly, the panel was stacked with Liberal allies, some quite openly so.
Recently, high-level briefing notes for a WEF meeting about The Great Reset, that took place on 8 December 2020, were obtained through Access to Information by Rebel News. The documents were provided to Chrystia Freeland, who was minister of Global Affairs Canada at the time. Freeland co-chaired the meetings along with officials from Japan, the Netherlands, South Africa, Google, and Goldman Sachs. The documents euphemistically state the WEF’s aim to use COVID-19 pandemic instability to restructure society, cancel oil and gas development, and censor the Internet. Initiatives that are well underway in Canada under the WEF-Trudeau federal regime.
While this article has attempted to establish that Canada’s government has been infiltrated by WEF-aligned politicians and bureaucrats, it is by no means a fully comprehensive accounting. In subsequent pieces, the present author hopes to document how transnational globalist entities are pursuing policies that are anathema to the interests of the historic Canadian nation.
Gunnar Alfredsson describes himself as a “writer and researcher based in frozen totalitarian Canadia, some crassitude.”