Jews and Their Long History of Hysteria and Overreach

If you’ve been around Jews for any period, you’ve likely discovered their tendency to exaggerate whatever they feel passionately about. Hyperbole seems to come easy to them. The sky is always falling. Doom is right around the corner. And, of course, it’s always directed at them because of their ethnic identity.

This powerful sense of group endangerment and historical grievance is associated with a hyperbolic style of Jewish thought that runs repeatedly through Jewish rhetoric. Chernin’s comment that “any negativity, criticism, or reproach, even from one of our own, takes on exaggerated dimensions” is particularly important. In the Jewish mind, all criticism must be suppressed because not to do so would be to risk another Holocaust: “There is no such thing as overreaction to an anti-Semitic incident, no such thing as exaggerating the omnipresent danger. Anyone who scoffed at the idea that there were dangerous portents in American society hadn’t learned ‘the lesson of the Holocaust.’ ”23 Norman Podhoretz, editor of Commentary, a premier neoconservative journal published by the American Jewish Committee, provides an example:

 [M]y own view is that what had befallen the Jews of Europe inculcated a subliminal lesson. . . . The lesson was that anti-Semitism, even the relatively harmless genteel variety that enforced quotas against Jewish students or kept their parents from joining fashionable clubs or getting jobs in prestigious Wall Street law firms, could end in mass murder.24

This is a “slippery slope” argument with a vengeance. The schema is as follows: Criticism of Jews indicates dislike of Jews; this leads to hostility toward Jews, which leads to Hitler and eventually to mass murder. Therefore all criticism of Jews must be suppressed. With this sort of logic, it is easy to dismiss arguments about Palestinian rights on the West Bank and Gaza because “the survival of Israel” is at stake. (“Background Traits for Jewish Activism,” p. 12).

As an example of this, it’s common for Jews to view all personal criticism of them as individuals as collective criticism of them as a people. It’s not that other ethnic groups don’t also engage in exaggeration and overreach at times, but only that Jews seem to have uniquely strong proclivities toward this sort of thing. One could say they have even perfected it.

There’s a long history of non-Jews noticing it too. Many Jews even concede this habit of theirs. They make no apologies for it either. It’s perfectly natural to them.

Yet like the Old Testament proverb that describes the evil man who is in continual fear that someone is chasing after him even though there isn’t (28:1), so also Jews often make whatever negative circumstances they find themselves in to be worse than they are or turn out to be. Their paranoia invariably leads them to faulty conclusions about the motivations of others. They are quick to impugn the character of anyone at the slightest perceived offense. This often leads to the most unfair and grossest of accusations, “anti-Semitism” being the most common.

For instance, the Jewish host of Democracy Now! (Amy Goodman) in 2002 asked the former Israeli Minister, Shulamit Aloni, what she thought about people in the U.S. who are critical of the Israeli government being called “anti-Semitic.” Her response illustrates precisely my point: “Well, it’s a trick. We always use it. When from Europe somebody’s criticizing Israel, then we bring out the Holocaust. When in this country people are criticizing Israel, then they are anti-Semitic . . . They are not ready to hear criticism.”

This reaction and strategy among Jews are perhaps understandable due to their tiny demographic in the U.S. comprising only about 1.8% of the overall population. This leads them to use their historic victim status and small numbers to blow things out of proportion in order to gain sympathy and approval from a gullible public.

Jews can be confident that their strategy will be supported by the U.S. government because “the Tribe” disproportionately influences much of the federal government, including society’s most important secondary institutions such as the news media, Hollywood, academia, and an array of social media platforms such as YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter. Congress on both sides of the political aisle is unabashedly committed to the Jewish people and Israel.

In fact, Speaker of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, has even gone on record to declare: “I have said to people when they ask me if this Capitol crumbled to the ground, the one thing that would remain is our commitment to our aid — and I don’t even call it aid — our cooperation with Israel. That’s fundamental to who we are” (Conference of the Israel-American Council, December 2, 2018).

History for at least the past 140 years is replete with examples of Jewish hysteria and overreach. Let’s look briefly at a few of them.

(1) Jews have claimed that great atrocities were committed against them in both Russia and Poland simply because of their Jewish ethnicity or religion. These ‘pogroms’ were instituted by the Russian and Polish governments, and they targeted Jews in the most inhumane ways. The persecutions were also carried out by local villagers. As a result, Jews were driven from their homes and businesses, and it’s claimed they suffered greatly at the hands of Russian and Polish Christians.

An article published in The Occidental Observer written by Andrew Joyce carefully examined such claims and found them in large part to be unfounded (“A Critical Look at the Polish ‘Pogroms’ of 1914–1920,’ May 1, 2022). Joyce cites the words of William Hagen (Anti-Jewish Violence in Poland, 1914–1920 [Cambridge University Press, 2018]) who assiduously investigated the matter: “Jewish reports tended toward exaggeration” (p.173).

Joyce notes that “From the outset, Hagen is skeptical of contemporary Jewish accounts that alleged spontaneous mass shootings. He opens the book by making it clear the documentary record has “gaps or blindspots” and “doubtless exaggeration occurred. . . . I have sought out multiple accounts so as to minimize bias.” He later argues that “resentment-laden animosity colored many such [Jewish] reports, which tended, in an atmosphere heavy with collective paranoia and hysteria, to exaggerate Jewish losses.” He even cites one brief but telling remark from Henry Morgenthau himself, who, although promoting atrocity propaganda, once admitted that “there is also no question but that some of the Jewish leaders [in Poland] had exaggerated” (A Critical Look at the Polish ‘Pogroms’ of 1914–1920).

This is not merely Hagen’s investigative conclusions, but also that of several other authors who discovered that Jewish reports of intense sufferings and prolonged mistreatment by the Polish people against them to be largely inflated and embellished.

The common assumption is that persecution of Jews always stems from irrational hatred when, in fact, the evidence strongly suggests that most of it is due to tensions between competing ethnic groups. Usury, fraud, various forms of thievery, and the multiple financial schemes that Jews engage in invariably provokes a backlash, one that sometimes leads to violence. Jews like gypsies are parasitical, and both groups often get the boot when people are angered and fed up with their deceitful ways. There is nothing irrational about it.

Andrew Joyce addressed the so-called Russian ‘pogroms’ in a series of articles also published in The Occidental Observer in May of 2012 (“Revisiting the 19th-century Russian Pogroms“). Joyce pulled his information from a wide variety of sources. One author stood out—the late John Doyle Klier and his monumental works: Pogroms: Anti-Jewish Violence in Modern Russian History [Cambridge University Press: 2004] and Russians, Jews, and the Pogroms of 1881–82 [Cambridge University Press: 2011]. Like the previously mentioned author, William Hagen, Klier is led to the same conclusions – namely, that Jews grossly exaggerated the events they declared to the world.

(2) Jews claim that “six million” of their people were murdered in the Holocaust and that this ‘liquidation’ of Jews was allegedly official Nazi policy ordered by Hitler himself. Jews were then systematically rounded up and forced to live in “death camps” where millions of Jews were gassed, tortured, and medically experimented on.

Given the exaggerations apparent in other Jewish claims of persecution, it would not be surprising to find similar exaggeration for the holocaust. Comparably few people are aware that the “six million” figure does not have its origin exclusively in the events of the Holocaust. The expression, in fact, was repeatedly employed by Jews as having symbolic, mystical, and kabbalistic significance prior to the outbreak of WW1. Interestingly, while Jews are allowed to interpret the “six million” number in a symbolic or allegorical way, this is not permissible for non-Jews. They must interpret it literally. No deviation is permitted. The double standard should be obvious.

The expression was routinely used by Jews beginning in 1850 among various newspapers, articles, and books which sought to highlight the sufferings of Jews in Russia. Over 250 separate pre-WW2 references to the “six million” can be documented in The New York Times, The Jewish Criterion, and a plethora of other American and Jewish newspapers and periodicals. American-Zionist leader, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, and Zionist pressure groups such as The World Jewish Congress and The American Jewish Congress made sure that Jews were always portrayed as innocent victims and just on the verge of complete annihilation.

The constant call was for the world to recognize the plight of Jews and to rescue them from the hands of their oppressors. For those interested in reviewing the documentation for this, two books are, in my opinions, required reading: Don Heddesheimer, The First Holocaust: The Surprising Origin of the Six Million Figure (Castle Hill Publishers: 2021); and Arthur Butz, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry (Castle Hill Publishers, 2015).

Whether one agrees with the Jewish narrative of the Holocaust or not, there is little doubt that the “six million” figure is but one more example of Jewish exaggeration and overreach.

(3) Along with the “six million” number, there are also numerous outrageous claims made by Jews during and after World War II. For instance, that the Nazis made  bars of soap and lampshades from Jewish skin. Nazis were alleged to have routinely committed the most unimaginable atrocities against Jews. Only later was much of it discredited and shown, once again, to have originated from Allied and Jewish propaganda.

Some of the most bizarre and unbelievable claims made by Jews as to what occurred inside the Nazi work camps are common (portable gas chambers, throwing Jewish babies into the air and bayoneting them, “masturbation machines” in which Jewish males were masturbated to death, etc.).

Jewish survival stories tend to be particularly fanciful, and many of them have been discredited upon closer examination. Behind them all are motives of greed and gaining sympathy for Jewish people. One such story involves Misha Defonseca (real name: Monique de Wael): “Desperate to be reunited with her parents, Misha travelled through war-torn Europe, becoming trapped in the Jewish ghetto in Warsaw. After escaping over a wall, she travelled thousands of miles to Ukraine, Romania, Yugoslavia, Italy, France and back to Belgium. During her arduous journey Misha said she stayed with a pair of wolves she named Maman Rita and Ita. . . . I was like the wolves — a hunted animal, and one that would be killed on sight. . . . Later she said she joined a pack of six adult wolves and four pups” (Grant Rollings, The U.S. Sun [8/4/2021]).

Turns out her wolf pack story was just a pack of lies. Misha reluctantly confessed her fakery when the matter was later investigated. She also had to return the millions she had profited from the story she weaved.

A good many of these Holocaust stories are so far-fetched that it’s hard to believe that intelligent people would take them seriously. Yet when it comes to the industry and religion of the Holocaust, one must bypass all critical thought and exercise only blind faith.

The Holocaust and spreading its message to the world is so important to Jews, in fact, that many of them believe it’s the key to their ethnic solidarity. It’s integral to who they are. Their belief in it is what holds them together, perhaps for some of them even more so than their belief in Yahweh and the Talmud.

Again, fanciful stories and claims about the Holocaust serve as examples of typical Jewish hyperbole. Mind you, I’m not saying that many Jews did not suffer and die during WW2 (so also did many non-Jews – even more so!). There were atrocities committed by almost all the involved parties (some more than others). Yet the Holocaust illustrates how deeply wedded Jews are to propaganda, and how they are largely unable to restrain themselves from spreading the most hysterical claims to the world that we are expected to believe without question. A good many Jews are offended when the same reviews and critical investigations that are applied to other historical events are applied to the Holocaust story. This event alone cannot be challenged. It’s not subject to the critical eye, and those who think otherwise soon discover the power of influential Jews. It shows again the religious nature of the Jewish Holocaust narrative.

(4) Additional examples of Jewish hysterical claims can be seen in more recent events, such as the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict and how it’s reported in the pro-Jewish American press. Israelis are almost always portrayed by Western media as innocent victims, while the Palestinians are always portrayed as terrorists and instigators. Since Jews largely control and influence our media, there is little nuance and context given.

(5) The Israeli government has claimed for over a decade that Iran has manufactured nuclear weapons and that a strike against Israel and America is surely imminent. Remember when Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, addressed a joint-meeting of congress in March of 2015 – you know, the one where he was given 29 standing ovations? He warned against what he called a “bad deal” that was being negotiated at the time between the Obama administration and Iran to freeze Iran’s nuclear program.

Netanyahu argued that any deal with Iran would lead it to create nuclear weapons within “about a year by U.S. assessment, even shorter by Israel’s.” Well, almost eight years has elapsed since that speech, and there is still no proof that Iran has nuclear weapons and intends to use them against Israel or any other nation. Netanyahu’s exaggerated claims and congress’s willingness to lap it up validated the former Israeli prime minister’s claim in 2001 when he said, “America is a thing you can move very easily.”

(6) That same level of Jewish-fueled hysteria occurred after 9-11 when a brood of Jewish neocons in the Bush administration persuaded President Bush that Iraq possessed “weapons of mass destruction.” It was later discovered to a be bold-faced lie, one that led to the complete ruin of the Iraqi nation and the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. These same Jewish neocons along with their compliant stooge, George W. Bush, led the U.S. to also invade Afghanistan. The foolishness and devastation of that two-decade quagmire should be obvious to all. Our withdraw from Afghanistan in August of 2021 leaving behind billions in military weapons only served to confirm it.

Israel and its subservient puppet, the U.S., has also engaged in a series of unjustified military strikes against Syria. The U.S. opposes Syria not because it poses a threat to the American people, but because the Israeli government perceives it to be an enemy-state, a regional threat to them.

The pattern seems to always be the same in all these conflicts. Anytime Israel feels threatened, it declares to the world a series of hysterical allegations all which spell doom to the Jewish people. Same as the hyperbolic claims by Jews prior to and during WW2, Jews are again about to be annihilated. It’s another Holocaust, but this time nuclear bombs will be used instead of poisonous gas.

(7) Consider also how Jews react to even slightest attempt on the part of Whites to unify in terms of their racial identity and cultural interests. Jews have always responded negatively to this sort of thing because they view it as potentially leading to the rise of another leader like Hitler who might unite Whites. Those same Whites could, as a result, turn against Jews and ‘voila!’ we’ve got another Holocaust on our hands. When you peel back the many layers of sophistry by Jews on why they oppose White people racially uniting, this is what you eventually discover.

This explains partly why Jews will never support even the mildest forms of White Nationalism. Politically conservative Jews might agree that illegal immigration is bad for the U.S., and they may even speak out now and then about Black criminality, but don’t ever expect them in any large number to declare that Whites have a right to be the dominant demographic in their own countries; that Whites have legitimate racial and cultural interests that ought to be preserved.

It should come as no surprise, then, why Jews will engage in the most extreme hyperbole and lies when assessing White racial identity. They are unable to treat the subject fairly because discerning Jews realize that when the goyim begin to grasp the ‘Jewish Question’ and its implications, it will invariably have an impact on Jewish hegemony over Europe and America. And so Jewish advocacy groups such as the ADL will continue to publish articles on its website and other platforms such as what Jonathan Greenblatt wrote in March of 2019: “White Supremacy is a Transnational Threat. Here’s why.”

Our current U.S. Attorney General who not-so-surprisingly happens to be Jewish, Merrick Garland, has recently parroted the same nonsense before Congress describing white supremacists as “the most dangerous threat to our democracy.” Such a statement would be laughable if it wasn’t so false and contrived.

(8) Consider also the gross exaggerations by our Jewish-dominated media when it comes to the current Russia-Ukraine conflict. Once again, complete lies, distortions, half-truths, and mythology abounds in reporting these events. The U.S. news media simply cannot be trusted, and it staggers the mind when one considers how many Americans are still unaware of this.

That overreach is such a prevalent trait among massive numbers of Jews suggests that it’s deeply rooted in their psyche, their character, and how they see the world around them. It’s largely part-and-parcel of who they are. One can reliably predict how Jews will react and what sort of extreme claims they will make when non-Jews start to wake up and ‘notice’ certain patterns about them. A circle-the-wagons reaction is almost always their collective response.

Yet we must ask ourselves: What kind of people are these who have such a habit of overreacting and grossly inflating every perceived criticism into something it’s not? Why would so many Jews react in this way? How does it help them or even work against their collective interests?

A couple of possible reasons could be given to such questions, but I must admit that these are only opinions drawn from historic patterns and are largely anecdotal in nature. Still, I believe those who are perceptive of Jews will mostly agree with the following two points:

Firstly, it’s the kind of response indicative of liars and conmen who discover that they are about to be exposed. More lies are compounded, and the hysteria ramps up in order to throw off their opponents or anyone else who might be observing. This helps to explain why Jewish advocacy groups like the ADL come down hard on any person or group that dares to challenge Jewish power structures in America. Noticing the same patterns of conduct by the same ethnic group — and then making it known to others — threatens America’s entrenched Jewish cabal. If too many were to discover it, uncomfortable questions would arise that could have devastating monetary consequences.

One must remember that Jews largely succeed and maintain disproportionate influence and power because they keep a low profile (at least mostly). They tend to work behind the scenes. They are not quick to draw attention to their ethnicity. Their last names are often no different than that of non-Jews so it’s not always readily apparent who they are.

This is, admittedly, not always the case. There are occasions when Jews speak openly of their ethnic and collective motives against their host country and its people. They will sometimes get caught boasting of who and what they control. This occurs when their ‘chutzpa’ is unable to restrain itself, and they more or less spill the beans.

Joel Stein in an L.A. Times article published in 2008 is one such example: “As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you’d be flipping between “The 700 Club” and “Davey and Goliath” on TV all day. So, I’ve taken it upon myself to re-convince America that Jews run Hollywood by launching a public relations campaign, because that’s what we do best. I’m weighing several slogans, including: “Hollywood: More Jewish than ever!”; “Hollywood: From the people who brought you the Bible”; and “Hollywood: If you enjoy TV and movies, then you probably like Jews after all . . . But I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them” (‘Who Runs Hollywood? C’mon’).

But for the most part, Jews prefer to work in ways that are not so obvious, choosing instead a more low-key and subtle approach, yet still retaining their same power and influence over society.

Secondly, Jews have a long history and persistent pattern of engaging in fraudulent monetary schemes and in creating vice industries. If it were widely known, for example, that Jews played a disproportionate role in the modern porn industry, including their dominant role in Weimar Germany in the years 1918-1933, it would not look favorable for them. Their reputation could be tarnished. An excellent book by Benjamin Garland, Merchants of Sin (2017), extensively documents this intriguing history. Jews were also major players in the gay rights movement as well as the recent Transexual movement in America. This includes the Civil Rights and the Feminist movements, all of which helped to destroy the social and moral fabric of the country.

Thus, for the public to discover that Jews were the main promoters of so much of the over-sexualization of this once great nation, it would certainly raise some eyebrows – although little would be done about it now when one considers how morally bankrupt the nation has become.

Most Americans generally perceive Jews as people who are deeply religious with a strong moral base (actually, great numbers of Jews are secular atheists). Such realities as noted above would be troublesome for many Americans. Jewish success, it must be remembered, is in large part due to the kind of image they project upon society. They are masters of propaganda, and this must always be remembered when dealing with them. Jews could not have created the motion picture industry in Hollywood if they did not have a seemingly innate ability to deceive, to create smoke and mirrors, and distort reality.

Their long history of relying on deception, trickery, including endless monetary schemes to get them through the centuries has perhaps given Jews an upper hand in some ways over gentiles. Thus, the kind of social problems and hysteria that Jews create in the U.S. should serve as a warning to other western countries. When Jews are allowed to burrow into a nation’s most important institutions and gain a permanent foothold, it’s just a matter of time before societal strife and division takes root. The pattern is undeniable.

48 replies
  1. Odessa
    Odessa says:

    I’m so sick and tired of the Jewish crap. Every country in the world has a Holocaust museum or something. Why? The Jew suffering is not greater, deeper or more profound then any of the hundreds of millions of europeans killed in WW2 and after. They have helped to ruin the U.S.A., with their perverse desire to absorb and kill off anything that is considered white Christian European. I believe that the ashkenazi tribe is out to try and install a European Israel in the Ukraine. The bread basket of Russia. The U.S. just promised 41billion dollars to the quasi Jewish invasion of Ukraine. This is just my opinion, Valarie Nuland is one of the many cancerous cells that are dedicated to help and destroy this Christian nation.

    • conrad gaarder
      conrad gaarder says:

      My answer to anyone who asks “why was the Holocaust Museum built here in the U.S.?” is “so you won’t talk about the Jews. And you don’t.”

    • hotrod31
      hotrod31 says:

      The Holohoax Museums are a very strategic moves to enshrine and ensure the continual milking of emotional sympathy from/of ALL other cultures. There are several of these ‘museums’ dotted around South Africa, a country controlled by Jewish Oligarchs.

    • RockaBoatus
      RockaBoatus says:

      “The Jew suffering is not greater, deeper or more profound than any of the hundreds of millions of Europeans killed in WW2 and after” – Correct. But to the Jewish mind, the life of a Jew is always greater than that of a gentile’s life. For example, in the Mishnah it is written that “whoever saves one life saves an entire world” (Sanhedrin 4:5). But that “one life” is not just anyone, but particularly a Jewish life. In other words, saving just one Jewish life is equivalent to saving the entire world.

      This is how grandiose and inflated the Jewish mindset is when it comes to the value of their own people. Again, these Talmudic Jews were not thinking of gentiles when they wrote of saving “one life,” but only of Jews. Gentiles could never have such intrinsic worth in their eyes, especially when the Talmud refers to non-Jews as dogs and as persons to be used by Jews for their own benefit (mere servants).

    • ValhallaX
      ValhallaX says:


      A Jewish life is not anymore valuable than any life. Simple. The idea that they have “earned” a status of something special is a crime against humanity. We will not become better people before we learn this. We should not value their suffering anymore than any suffering. Plus we should not forget their part on the colossal Jewish Concentration Camp for White People. And I mean Soviet Union. If we ever are asked to remember “Jewish suffering”, we should ask them to build memorials for tens of millions of valuable lives destroyed by their pet ideology.

      We should stand up and start behaving like real men, and real women. And make sure that this genocide against us is stopped and this ridiculous worship of Jews is finished. We cannot change the world any better if we continue this stupid, stupid behaviour.

    • carol hinrichsen
      carol hinrichsen says:

      Succinct, excellent commentary.
      The “destruction and chaos” that they have caused in South Africa since 1961 is witness to the fact that their population here is the highest in Africa.

    • Shafar Nullifidian
      Shafar Nullifidian says:

      I think you mean Victoria Nuland? That satanic, hydrophobic sowlike is more bloodthirsty than a cargo container ship full of super max tampons!

  2. Desert Flower
    Desert Flower says:

    “Thus, the kind of social problems and hysteria that Jews create in the U.S. should serve as a warning to other western countries.”

    I think you mean “serve as a warning to other non-Western countries” (India, China, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, etc.) I imagine these non-Western countries are incredibly Jew-savvy, seeing what has happened to the United States and to the United Kingdom (and what happened to Poland, Russia, Germany). It’s destruction and chaos wherever these people land.

    • RockaBoatus
      RockaBoatus says:

      Thank you. My words were intended as a warning for western countries (which have already been infected in large part by Jewish influence and control), but you’re absolutely correct such a warning may more aptly apply to non-western countries.

  3. Bernard Fisk Wellington IV
    Bernard Fisk Wellington IV says:

    Good summary regarding the nose….excellent for normies needing a concise overview of the JQ.

    Can sum it up by saying they are crazy psychotic liars.

  4. todd hupp
    todd hupp says:

    Wow.A masterpiece of truth and reality.The WWII camps were forced labor operations to support the German War effort.
    Generally -unlike the USA- women were not employed in war factories. Acceptable ethic women were encouraged and rewarded to stay home and procreate. EG free Volkswagens. Accordingly non whites ,deviants and war prisoners staffed the factories .

    “Exterminating” ones labor would be counter productive.T

    Toward the end mal nutritional and disease-not gassing-caused camp deaths.

    The Talmud teaches the Jews are superior(chosen) and reign over/dominate the inferior goys. This is unfolding in the USA.

  5. Rebecca
    Rebecca says:

    An excellent summary of the deceit and lies of Jewish history! Thank you.

    Even here internal conditioning censoring occurs as the author stops short of stating that 6 million Jews were not gassed in WWII and that a small percentage of Jews died, mainly from disease and starvation caused by the “Allies.”

  6. John Alder
    John Alder says:

    What’s the difference between the holocaust and a cow? You can’t milk a cow for 75 years.

  7. anarchyst
    anarchyst says:

    There is another way…
    As most major population centers have “holocaust™” museums (actually jewish freak shows), it is long overdue to expose this fraud that jews have been imposing on much of the western world.
    One suggestion is to produce flyers depicting two “holocaust™” free-speech martyrs (Ursula Haverbeck and Monika Schaefer) with the simple question: “Why were these two elderly women prosecuted and imprisoned in German maximum-security prisons?”
    Handing out these flyers in front of the “holocaust™” freak shows will most certainly attract attention (and possibly get one arrested) but can be a way to help expose the truth about this historical non-event.
    In addition, mailing copies of these flyers to local media outlets (while feigning outrage) will most certainly get them noticed on the six-o’clock local news (with charges of “anti-semitism”).
    The obvious censorship will not be noticed by the media types (who are primarily jewish to begin with) but will be noticed by those watching the news programs.

    DEWDDS says:

    I recall reading “The Holocaust” by the eminent British-Jewish historian, Martin Gilbert, years back and not being able to finish it. Why? When I started encountering the supposed first hand Jewish accounts of atrocities, I could feel credulity stretching. Many of these tales were outrageously unbelievable. My first thought was how any historian could be sucked into reporting these events as real? It was only later that I found out Gilbert was Jewish. Too many to this day hold that work as sacred scripture on all things related to the Shoah. Indeed. There’s no business like Shoah business.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      I believe Martin Gilbert is the only author allowed to see all the private family papers on Churchill.
      I thought Churchill was a British hero? Why isn’t a British historian, or better still, the British public allowed access to all these secret files?
      What on earth could they possibly be hiding? Didn’t Churchil ‘save’ us? Surely if he was banging his footman or whatever, such things would be forgiven, especially now-a-days?
      We already know all about how he ripped off paintings, sent squaddies to their doom while drunk and incinerated whole cities for basically no reason except a bizarre sadism.
      What could the family want this establishment Jew to keep from us that is worse than these sorts of things?

  9. Bobby
    Bobby says:

    This is a great piece for the Normies Rock and a reminder to the rest of us here. You should definitely try and get it out to some of the Normies though.

    I will spare everyone here specific examples. But having lived on the east coast of the U.S., for most of my life, and being around many Jews, if there is one thing that I can attest to and assure you, it is that they are a hysterical people, it is their number one personality trait. I absolutely believe that it is caused by their thousands of years of inbreeding.

    If I may Rock, one critique;

    “Again, fanciful stories and claims about the Holocaust serve as examples of typical Jewish hyperbole. Mind you, I’m not saying that many Jews did not suffer and die during WW2 (so also did many non-Jews – even more so!). There were atrocities committed by almost all the involved parties (some more than others)”.

    This is fine, but using hard facts here is very important because it helps to negate the holohoax. You could add; “According to most scholars, by the time Lenin (Jewish on his mother’s side) died in 1924, over five million Russian Christians were either murdered, tortured, or starved to death. By the time Stalin died in 1954, over 50 million Russian Christian men, women, and children, had met the same faith. Many of the atrocities carried out by Soviet Jewish leaders Lazar Kaganovich and Genrick Yagoda, both Jewish. Historians such as Donald Rayfield in his book, ‘Stalin and His Hangmen: The Tyrant and Those Who Killed for Him,’ Sever Plocker in his famous essay, Stalin’s Jew’s, Plocker is Jewish, and of course A. Solzhenitsyn, all put the numbers slaughtered by the predominantly Jewish run Soviet Union at well over 20 million. Many scholars such as Solzhenitsyn put the numbers at well over 50 million.”

    You get the picture Rock. Then if you want to, you can run with it a bit: “Why aren’t we ever taught that part of history in school? Why aren’t we ever taught about the over 40 million murdered by Mao? What about Pol Pot? What about the Armenian genocide? Even if Hitler did kill 6 million people, how is he the epitome of evil? Why is it always the white, European guy…?”

    And if you want to have some real fun, and I love doing this, I got the chance to do it last week, tell those things to Jews on social media, or wherever you can in front of gentiles, and watch them get ‘hysterical’, in front of others best. If there is one thing that the Jews can’t stand, one thing that makes their hair stand on end, it is of course, the truth.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      ” . Lenin (Jewish on his mother’s side)”
      Then Jewish full-stop.
      ” . over 40 million murdered by Mao?”
      Mao didn’t murder 40 million. That’s just nonsense Cold War propaganda. The Armenian thing probably happened though. Although the blame for that can also be shared by British criminals like Churchill and Grey who turned a European conflict into a world war.
      But this thing with Hitler just makes you want to slam your head against the wall.
      In a secular age, a dreaded figure to frighten the horses – give the kids nightmares, was needed to replace the devil.
      The Jews offered one up, so horns were replaced with a pencil moustache, a fire-red outfit with a military uniform, and a pointed tail with parted black hair as THE symbols of ultimate evil.
      How conservatives didn’t object to this new Lucifer being right wing, male, white, patriotic, nationalistic and the only leader to try and remove his nation from the international criminal banking cartels just makes you want to weep.
      How could they possibly not foresee the danger here? What on earth were they thinking?
      This is why it’s always the “white European guy”.
      You can only lamely blame Jews because this is just what Jews do, what do you expect, and blaming leftists is a bit like blaming the weather.
      Our number one foe since before WWII has always been, and always will be, safe, gelded, system-friendly conservatives.
      They and only they block the formation of an organisation that could properly represent and protect us, our people and our nations.
      A conservative’s only function, with hindsight, appears to be to drag the Jewish/leftist destruction/torture out as long as possible. And to turn any natural pushback from the people into pure impotence.
      The conservative’s only talent is to attack and blunt all those to his right, they are worse than useless against the left. Why else would they be allowed a place in our system? If they actually did as advertised, they’d be as banned from everywhere as we are.

  10. Franklin Ryckaert
    Franklin Ryckaert says:

    The story of Misha Defonseca’s miraculous survival among the wolves cannot serve as an example of typical Jewish mendacity since she was not Jewish. A similar case is that of Binjamin Wilkomirski (real name Bruno Grosjean) who wasn’t Jewish either.
    A real case of a Jewish false Holocaust survival story is that of Herman Rosenblat (“Angel at the Fence”) which mislead even Oprah Winfrey.

    • RockaBoatus
      RockaBoatus says:

      Thank you for pointing this out. She did portray herself in her book as a young Jewish girl who survived the Holocaust and wandered throughout Europe searching for her parents who had earlier been deported. Reading through a couple of articles on her life, I was not aware at the time when I wrote the article for TOO that she was also lying about her Jewish ancestry. My apologies.

  11. Carroll Price
    Carroll Price says:

    The 6 million Jewish holocaust tale is typical war propaganda repeated to the point it has become fact in the minds of individuals lacking critical thinking skills. Which among all populations, regardless of education levels, is about 85 percent.

    If you want to get thrown out of a holocaust museum on our head, just start asking attendants practical questions like how Germans with relatively primitive “ovens” were able to incinerate several thousand bodies per day as testified to by eye witnesses when it’s a well fact that it takes about 90 minutes to dispose of a single human body in a modern-day crematoria oven.

  12. Emicho
    Emicho says:

    “When Jews are allowed to burrow into a nation’s most important institutions and gain a permanent foothold, it’s just a matter of time before societal strife and division takes root. The pattern is undeniable.”

    The difference between Polish and English peasants in the middle ages highlights this as well. Edward Longshanks kicked the Jews out in 1290, allowing a period to develop that would be remembered as ‘Merry England’.
    Although class in England was highly regimented, it was also fluid and many rose quickly up the ranks, their talent dragging the nation into eventually into a European superpower. You can still see the incredible wealth in old houses from this period, that survive to this day all over England.
    The Poles weren’t so lucky, their elite used the Jews to screw as much wealth as possible out of the peasants, while also retarding any advancement they may make.
    What is obvious in hindsight is that it wasn’t just every last drop of toil & coin that was extracted from the average Pole, but also their merchant, industrial and cultural spirit, ensuring Poland and other similar Jew-plagued Eastern European states stayed as penniless backwaters.
    The oldest house in England belonged to a Jew, it only survives because it was built like a castle to store their loot and provide protection when the people got sick of their thieving ways.
    The Jews came back with Cromwell but only really began to influence Britain at the start of the 20th century, which amazingly, was exactly when Britain started to go downhill after 800 straight years of growing power and prosperity.
    But it’s probably just a coincidence.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      Spain also exploded into a world power round about the time they rid themselves of their Jews. So did Nazi Germany come to think of it.
      What i would like to know is, if anyone knows of any good any Jew has ever done, in all of recorded history? Not including the likes of Freedman, Kostler and Shahak, who just alert us to their tribe’s dangers.
      Has a Jew, as a Jew, ever benefitted any non-Jew, in a non self-serving way, ever?

  13. Jack Brody
    Jack Brody says:

    In the article, the demolitions of the WTC buildings on 9-11-2001 were briefly mentioned.

    On that day, not long after the Twin Towers had been turned to dust, the System told us that they had been brought down by the impact of two airliners and the resulting fires.

    The System eventually told us that a total of four planes had been hijacked by passengers with box-cutters, and we were even told the names of the hijackers.

    But how did the System know which of the passengers had done the hijacking? Did the hijackers get on the radio, identify themselves, and announce their intentions? No. Did the crews of the planes get on the radio and say that Arab hijackers with box-cutters had taken over? No.

    Perhaps the minions of the System examined the passenger lists and said “Aha! Here are some men with Arab names. They must be the hijackers!” No. The names of the men that we are told did the hijackings are not even on those passenger lists. (If their names were not on the passenger lists, then they were not on those airplanes; if they were not on those airplanes, then they did not hijack those airplanes. I hope that this ultra convoluted reasoning isn’t hurting your brain.)

    So what did the System present as evidence about the hijackers? Cell-phone calls made by passengers on the planes. However, such calls would have been impossible. At that time in the U.S., a cell-phone tower even had great difficulty handing over to the next tower a call from a phone in an automobile going 70 miles per hour. One of the calls lasted 18 minutes. Later, when it had been amply proven that cell-phone calls could not have been made from airliners, the System amended its lies. It said that the calls were made by airphones, telephones provided by the airlines. Then why did caller-ID show the recipients of the calls that they had come from cell-phones?

    A stewardess from one of the planes left a message on her husband’s answering machine. The answering machine showed that the call had been made by her cell-phone. She recited the tale of how the plane had been hijacked, but just before she hung up, she whispered “It’s a frame.”

    It has been shown that many of the alleged hijackers were still alive after 9-11. That’s rather puzzling, isn’t it? I didn’t know that it was possible for a man who is alive today to have been killed on an earlier day. But if the System says that it is so, then it must be so! Mommy wuvs her pwecious widdle boy too much to lie to him! Ever!

    If it is proven that a witness has lied, then all of his testimony becomes completely worthless. Everything that he says becomes worth less than nothing. From that point on, to listen to him with the expectation of hearing some truth is insanely foolish.

    We have not heard any audio from the cockpit voice recorders of the four planes that were allegedly hijacked. The Masters tell us that the two recorders from the planes that hit the Twin Towers were never found and that the one found at the Pentagon was so badly damaged that it was unusable. The F.B.I. says that it has the one from that airliner that allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, but they refuse to let us hear the recording. Aren’t you grateful to the Masters?

    In violation of protocol, not a single fighter plane was scrambled to go after the hijacked airliners. We are told that a large plane was allowed to penetrate the most heavily defended airspace in the world on its way to the Pentagon and was not shot down by a missile or even challenged by a fighter plane.

    The military commanders who were responsible for protecting New York City and Washington, D.C. on that day were not punished for their malfeasance. Instead, they were all promoted.

    The Arab who allegedly flew an airliner into the Pentagon wasn’t even qualified to solo in a single-engine Cessna. We are told that as he was getting close to the Pentagon, he decided that it wouldn’t be very nice to hit the wall of the Pentagon that lay directly ahead of him; so he made an incredible maneuver, a 270-degree turn, that resulted in the plane’s hitting a part of the Pentagon that was undergoing renovation and that contained the fewest employees. (Experts have stated that it would have taken an experienced pilot in a jet fighter many attempts to accomplish that feat.) Like all hijackers, that Arab was extremely sweet and saintly, and he was given superhuman powers by God to enable him to complete his mission.

    The type of airplane that allegedly hit the Pentagon had two massive jet engines that were largely constructed of almost indestructible titanium. No such engines were found at the crash site. That fact alone proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the System is lying.

    Major General Albert Stubblebine: “One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s imagery interpretation…. I look at the hole in the Pentagon, and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon: the plane does not fit in that hole. So what did hit the Pentagon?”

    Col. George Nelson (Aircraft accident investigator, U.S. Air Force): “With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon.”

    Norman Mineta, Transportation Secretary, in sworn testimony before the 9/11 Commission, described what happened as the aircraft approached the Pentagon: “There was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President ‘The plane is 50 miles out’, ‘The plane is 30 miles out.’ And when he got down to ‘The plane is 10 miles out’, the young man also said to the Vice President ‘Do the orders still stand?’ and the Vice President … whipped his neck around and said ‘Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?'”

    It’s obvious that the orders in question were not to shoot down the incoming aircraft.

    Mineta’s testimony was omitted from the final “9/11 Commission Report”.

    In 2004 the 9/11 Commission interviewed Douglas Cochrane, the young man who said “Do the orders still stand?” Of course, the interview has been withdrawn from public access, and it still remains classified.

    The F.B.I. (the Federal Bureau of Intimidation, according to Revilo P. Oliver) confiscated many tapes from security cameras that showed the aircraft hitting the Pentagon, and then they denied that they had any tapes. They were finally forced to release a few frames of video from two cameras that were taken at the moment of approach and impact. However, both cameras had the same point of view, and the frames do not show the aircraft. At least one frame had been doctored.

    But the True Believers are wailing, “We can’t stand to believe that the F.B.I. is the enemy of the American people! At least, we know that the F.B.I. was a champion of truth and freedom and the American way when it was under J. Edgar Hoover.” Really? Here’s what Revilo Oliver wrote about Homo Hoover:

    “The Federal government accordingly began outrageously illegal efforts to prevent [the re-election of Congressman Lindbergh] … by … a terrorist raid on his home, conducted by agents of the ‘Justice’ Department under the command of … John Edgar Hoover. The Congressman’s son, Charles Augustus Lindbergh … , was almost fifteen when the Federal goons raided his father’s home, and one source says that it was J. Edgar Hoover in person who mauled the young boy.”

    Dr. William L. Pierce: “The Federal Bureau of Investigation harassed authors, editors, publishers, and lecturers who attempted to warn the American people that the Jews were brewing up a new war for their own ends. J. Edgar Hoover sent out his ‘black bag’ squads to burglarize the homes and offices of law-abiding citizens and to steal their private papers and research materials, all without the slightest worry that the news media would cry ‘foul!'”

    When are the True Believers going to get it? The System is totally corrupt, totally psychopathic, and totally Satanic. Anyone who has any loyalty to this System is utterly contemptible.

    There are well-tested standards that govern the design and construction of skyscrapers. Architects and engineers know about fire. They know about steel and how it is affected by heat. They even know about jet airliners (although the True Believers in the System’s lies find that inconceivable). In fact, the towers were specifically designed and built to withstand the impact of more than one jet airliner.

    Some say that the steel beams couldn’t survive the extra-special heat generated by that super-duper flammable liquid called “jet fuel”. They don’t point out that “jet fuel” is simply kerosene. (This tells me that they are either contemptibly, disgustingly, and inexcusably ignorant or psychopathically dishonest.) The kerosene burned up very quickly and had little effect on the steel beams. And the third building to fall wasn’t hit by a plane.

    The firemen that were in the first building that collapsed weren’t worried. They said on the radio that the fire could be easily knocked down. New York City firemen know about fires in skyscrapers. They believed that skyscrapers don’t collapse because of fire. And they were right.

    Although there have been quite a few fires in skyscrapers around the world, none of those buildings collapsed as a result. And yet we are expected to believe that three skyscrapers collapsed on the same day because of relatively small fires. Anyone who believes that will believe absolutely anything that the System tells him. He will start believing that 2 + 2 = 5 as soon as the System starts saying that.

    Popular Mechanics magazine is credited with inducing the American sheeple to believe that the absurd “pancaking theory” explains how the two towers were able to collapse at near free-fall speed and turn to dust. And who was the “senior researcher” for that article? A Jew named Benjamin Chertoff. Yes, a relative of Michael Chertoff. (If the floors had pancaked, the massive central steel columns would have remained standing.) Jews would never lie to us, would they? They love us too much for that.

    The January 2002 issue of Fire Engineering magazine characterized the FEMA investigation of the collapse of the three buildings as “a half-baked farce”. Eric Hufschmid: “Later that month, both Bush and Cheney asked Tom Dashiell to ‘limit the investigation’. Apparently, a half-baked farce was more of an investigation than Bush and Cheney wanted. I suppose they would have preferred a quarter-baked farce.”

    After the FBI-engineered bomb attack in 1993 (the FBI ordered their paid informant to build a fully functional bomb for the terrorists; 6 people were killed; hundreds were injured; the monsters in the FBI were not even prosecuted), bomb-sniffing dogs were added to the security system of the towers. On September 6, 2001, five days before the demolition of the buildings, the dogs were inexplicably removed.

    Employees who were in the sub-basements of the North Tower say that they heard and felt explosions before an aircraft hit either tower.

    If the buildings had not conveniently collapsed on that day, if they had merely been damaged, it would have been illegal to use controlled demolition to remove them. The buildings were full of asbestos. Before the buildings were eliminated, the Twin Towers had become liabilities. “The Port Authority was looking at an asbestos-abatement bill of as much as 1 billion dollars.”

    Ernst Zundel said, “Within two weeks of the attack, I was questioning the official line … because there were so many discrepancies.”

    Let’s perform a thought experiment. We have two identical 100-story steel-framed skyscrapers. Using our magical powers, we remove the lowest 75 stories of the first building, leaving the top 25 stories untouched. At the same instant, we remove only 5 contiguous stories from the second building, leaving the lowest 70 stories and the highest 25 stories untouched. At that instant, the 25-story tops of both buildings are poised in mid-air, ready to fall. However, the first has only air between it and the ground, while the second has 5 stories of air followed by 70 stories of steel-framed skyscraper. The tops of the two buildings begin to fall. Which do you think is going to hit the ground first? Don’t you think that it will take a lot longer for the second one to hit the ground (if it hits the ground at all)? And yet, the Twin Towers fell at virtually free-fall speed.

    We have video showing molten steel flowing from one of the Twin Towers before either had collapsed.

    All of the concrete floors in the Twin Towers were pulverized (converted to dust) before they even hit the ground. Doing that required a tremendous amount of energy, energy for which there is no evident source.

    Some of the concrete was melted. How was a temperature high enough to do that generated?

    So what is the System’s explanation for the magical way that the towers were able virtually to collapse at free-fall speed and turn to dust? They cannot give an explanation. They don’t even pretend to. NIST’s 10,000 page report discusses only the initiation of the collapses. A footnote on page 82 states that the report “does not actually include the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached and collapse became inevitable.”

    And who was the “lead investigator” for the NIST report on 9-11? A creature from India that calls itself Shyam Sunder.

    In May 2002, FEMA released its report on the collapse of the buildings. We read: “The specifics of the fires in Building 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time.”

    Paul Craig Roberts: “It is a non-controversial fact that the official explanation of the collapse of the WTC buildings is false.”

    Science tells us that these buildings were not brought down by airliners. Engineering principles tell us that these buildings were not brought down by airliners. Architectural principles tell us that these buildings were not brought down by airliners. So why do so many Aryan “leaders” believe that these buildings were brought down by airliners? They think that if the “experts”, the media, and the government say that something is so, then it must be so! They believe the lie because ZOG insists that it is true.

    This is the attitude of these “leaders”:

    “How can such a gnat as I
    Question such a mighty fly?”

    Any man who is truly trying to oppose ZOG’s genocide of the Aryan race will readily understand that to believe and endorse the System’s 9-11 lies is contemptible treason to his race and is inexcusable, mindless loyalty to a Satanic System.

    It’s obvious that the System is very pleased when so-called leaders in the White movement mindlessly and timidly accept the System’s false-flag attacks at face value. That is exactly what the System wants them to do. Why are these so-called leaders so eager to please the System? Why do they want to be poodles on the System’s leash? Why are they abject cowards who are afraid to think for themselves?

    If these so-called leaders were to start exposing the System’s false-flag attacks, the System would be angered and alarmed. Angering and alarming the System is the last thing that these so-called leaders want to do, so they refuse to watch the freely available videos that debunk the 9-11 lie. Instead, they spout generalities about “absurd conspiracy theories”, “Occam’s razor”, etc. Is it possible that they are being paid to keep the sheeple pacified? What disgusting traitors.

    Let’s put 9-11 aside for the moment. Let’s assume for the sake of argument that the System perpetrates a false-flag attack on its own people and then blames it on X. The FBI says that it has overwhelming proof that X did it, and all of the media tell us thousands of times that X did it; however, there are many “Truthers” who point out the impossibilities in the System’s story. Isn’t it obvious that the so-called leaders that I’ve been lambasting will go along with the System and say that X did it? They are far too timid and servile to do otherwise. They tremble with fear when they think of being called “conspiracy theorists”, “crackpots”, “flat-earthers”, “the lunatic fringe”, etc. Now imagine that you were able to force one of these creatures to watch, one after the other, the videos that disprove the System’s tales about X until finally he could no longer pretend that he believed the System. Would he be at all grateful to you for leading him to the truth? No. He would pout, blubber, and wail, “A widdle boy needs a mommy! You took away my mommy! You’re a bad man! You’re a very bad man!”

    Richard Gage, founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth: ” … more than 1500 architects and engineers … are calling for a new investigation into the destruction of these three World Trade Center high-rises.” But our sweet widdle boys don’t care what architects and engineers say. They only want to listen to Benjamin Chertoff and Shyam Sunder.

    These so-called leaders don’t push for an honest investigation of this crime of mass murder against the American people; they don’t call for the execution of the murderers. Instead, in effect what they are saying to the Satanic murderers is, “Please murder more of us in false-flag attacks in order to further your agendas or just for fun. We won’t dream of lifting a finger against you. In fact, we will tell our dupes that you are completely innocent and blameless. The more of us that you murder, the more submissive we will be.” All that they ever do is mumble and grumble about some of the System’s policies; they don’t try to uncover the truth. They are helpless and hopeless. By controlling what they believe, the System controls what they do.

    Imagine that you are driving down the road and that the windshield of your car is equipped with a heads-up display. You realize that it is quite possible that the computer that controls the display is using it to conceal what actually lies ahead and to feed you false information. Wouldn’t you be tempted to stick your head out the window in order to see what’s actually out there? Of course, but that’s not true of our sweet widdle so-called leaders of the White movement. All they want to do is drool as they watch ZOG’s propaganda with mouths agape. They wouldn’t even dream of watching videos that expose ZOG’s 9-11 lies.

    Orwell: “Who controls the past … controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.”

    Revilo P. Oliver: “Professor Goldman … claimed that he and ‘most historians’ regarded history as a ‘weapon’ to be used for ‘determining people’s ideas and attitudes.'”

    These “leaders” are perfectly content to let the Jews own and control history.

    Logic, reason, physics, chemistry, engineering, and eye-witnesses tell us that the System’s 9-11 tale is a lie. The only reason to believe it is the grovelling slave’s blind and servile faith in a perfidious master.

    No matter how absurd and ridiculous the lies of the System are, the True Believers will continue to believe.

    They know that Mommy wuvs her pwecious widdle boys and girls too much to lie to them.

    Hear Frederick C. Blackburn explain to Jan Lamprecht why the alleged cell-phone calls were impossible:

    A masterful shredding of the System’s 9-11 lies:
    “9-11: The New Pearl Harbor”

    Jan Lamprecht introduces and shows a video by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth:

    “Painful Deceptions” by Eric Hufschmid:

    • Frank Holden
      Frank Holden says:

      A thorough and informed comment Jack…as good as the RockaBoatus article…One complaint: What have you got against Elmer Fudd?

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      You forgot to mention that if the plane that hit the towers was going at the speed the official version states, it would have broken up at that low altitude.
      But it’s not possible to mention every falsity and impossibility of the 9/11 hoax in a one comment, it would take about three volumes.
      Calling those asking for a proper, honest investigation into the tragedy as ‘truthers’ was also a particularly vile piece of work, turning the word “truth” into a thing of contempt and ridicule.
      This in itself is Satanic, and we are well past Orwellien with this sort of thing.
      The King David Hotel, the USS Liberty, 9/11, Covid19.
      Let’s just keep letting them away with it, yeah, these stone cold murders are getting progressively worse, but maybe they’ll just get bored and begin to leave us alone?
      One other thing, Julian Assange stated publicly 9/11 went down exactly as officialdom said it did. And Wikileaks has never released ANYTHING that’s been detrimental to Israel’s interests.
      It just never ends.

  14. Hillary Goldberg Levin
    Hillary Goldberg Levin says:

    I just noticed that Ron Unz is claiming that the Immigration Act of 1965 has had nothing to do with opening the borders….
    and his claims regarding what the act does is exactly the opposite of my understanding of the act.
    He says that WN’s have been wrong all along but we are too ashamed to admit we were wrong.
    You went over the act in great detail in the CofC and you regard chapter 7 as the most important section of the book.
    Wondering how you’d respond to Unz’s claims.

    • Kevin MacDonald
      Kevin MacDonald says:

      I recall he emailed me his opinion. Other writers looking at the law, like Hugh Davis Graham and Otis Graham, and Jewish writers like Earl Raab, see it as a watershed event. I discuss these writers and deal with Nathan Cofnas’s claims re the article here:

      In my view, the law by itself didn’t change US demography, but it got rid of the national origins provisions so after that Jewish organizations simply pushed for greater numbers.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      With the understanding that KM’s reply or replies to your question require neither an addition nor a gloss, I take the liberty of offering a few notes of my own.

      In common with many other empiricists, Ron Unz believes nothing save what he has discovered for himself. The extent to which a particular “discovery” may or may not correspond with all of the available evidence, however, is seldom a matter that seems to cost him a moment’s sleep. In short, notwithstanding his intelligence and breadth of education, he suffers from chronic moral and intellectual tunnel vision, and he evinces little to no interest in being cured of it.

      Two of the striking things about his comments on the Hart-Celler Act are (1) the way he frequently resorts to counterfactual supposition—i.e., “what if” postulating—and (2) the way he confuses, deliberately or otherwise, legalism with reality. For example, he makes a big deal of how, prior to 1965, “any Mexican who paid something like $18 and waited a couple of days for processing could legally immigrate to the US.” He then immediately postulates, however, that “Mexicans back then were very poor and impatient and since no one seriously enforced our immigration laws, most of them just walked across the border illegally.” Nowhere does he mention or even seem to be aware that prior to the mid-sixties, a Mexican who entered the USA was not greeted by someone offering him a free ticket to the Emerald City of Unlimited Public-Financed Handouts. That the lack of a gold-plated, taxpayer-financed safety net might have had some influence on a potential “migrant’s” state of mind is not something that Ron Unz has taken into account, at least to date or in a public context.

      In short, he speaks of and interprets both the Johnson-Reed Act (1924) and the Hart-Celler Act (1965) as if each came to being in a context that was effectively 100 percent independent of a real-world context.

      I need hardly add that, however remarkable his site’s openness to criticism of all things Jewish, the fact remains that Ron Unz has no skin in a game that even marginally involves nostalgia for an America whose men and women were overwhelmingly both white and Christian and who thought of their homeland as a Christian nation, whether or not they were aware of the open anatagonism of a large percentage of the country’s founders and subsequent rulers to Christianity—except when it suited the latter’s purposes to drag Christ out of the closet for political gain.

      In common with a great many TOO habitués, Unz’s interpretation of history and of facts and figures is colored indelibly by his hostility for Christianity and those who embrace it. The primary way, perhaps the only way, that Unz’s outlook differs from that of a typical ex- or anti-Christian TOO contributor or reader is in Unz’s indifference to whether a so-called American of the future is in fact white—so long, that is, that he isn’t especially black and doesn’t interfere with the hyperenrichment schemes of Unz and his fellow technocrats. As experience tells all who will listen, even the soulless select their own society.

      • Emicho
        Emicho says:

        “In common with many other empiricists, Ron Unz believes nothing save what he has discovered for himself”
        That ryhmns with something I heard him say on a podcast. He himself discovered some female public health official in San Fran or some place, decided to act independently with a few colleagues and enforce lockdowns in her own district to ape the Chinese in stopping their spread of Covid.
        This was then copied in California, New York then the entire nation.
        To him this *proves* it wasn’t a conspiracy to wreck small businesses and enrich mega chain billionaires.
        But he doesn’t mention that the Chinese actually have the govermental & social ability to enfore a lock down to stop a spread of a virus, while the idea a Western nation could successfully do this is absurd.
        Nor why this obvious failure of a method was copied so enthusiastically around the country and the entire Western world.
        The proportion of the the Western population that religiously went through all the ridiculous Covid rules(locking themselves indoors,
        obsessive handwashing, triple mask wearing, social distancing, abandoning family and friends, etc) would probably match the proportion who put Ukraine flags on their twitter feed. I.e. hardly any, but we all know the type.
        I like Unz, but your point here is true.

        • Pierre de Craon
          Pierre de Craon says:

          The proportion of the Western population that religiously went through all the ridiculous Covid rules … would probably match the proportion who put Ukraine flags on their twitter feed. I.e. hardly any, but we all know the type.

          I am pleased to be told that “hardly any” corresponds with what you see—I think you’re in England, yes? I regret to say, however, that in New York City, despite the fact that masking is now required only on mass transit, the proportion of WHITE people who still go masked outdoors and in stores and markets is probably 40 percent overall but much, much higher among those under thirty, the very people who are of course LEAST likely to get more than a runny nose from the Covid monster. Their count is at least 70 percent, perhaps higher.

          Speaking as someone who is just a few months younger than KM and thus hasn’t a lot longer to live, I find the cowardice and conformity of young white people of all economic strata to be deeply disheartening. The absence of common sense is even more distressing to see. By way of example, a week or so ago, I overheard two women talking about the illegitimacy of the Biden regime because of the stolen 2020 election. Yet both these women were fully masked! How could they fail to see that politicians who steal an election shouldn’t be trusted about something as important as one’s health?

          • Pierre de Craon
            Pierre de Craon says:

            What follows was accidentally omitted from the comment above.

            With respect to Ukie flags on Twitter, as I never look at any social media services, I can’t comment on them. I can say, however, that once you’re away from Manhattan’s business districts, one no longer sees any public sign of interest in the war. On the other hand, I’ve been reliably told that the city’s many college and university campuses are still hotbeds of conformity with the Jewish Narrative on evil Russia and suffering Ukraine.

          • Emicho
            Emicho says:

            “hardly any” – as in proportion to the rest of the population, but I don’t think the mask wearing has anything to do with all the insane neurotic things, that’s what I really meant.
            Masks are fashionable in certain circles, then you’ve got the actually heathy impulse of social solidarity(though abused) that such wearing entails.
            Nobody believes in the Covid hoax less than me, but even I can on certain very rare occasions be found to be wearing a mask, when it’s compulsory obviously, but also when not wearing one just feels like too much of an passive aggressive act against people I don’t know, but do feel sympathy towards.
            I have some friends who belong to what we in Britain call the ‘benefit class’, (they’d be homeless if they lived in America) who are a huge chunk of the population here, and I can report that the uptake of *any* of the rules was I’d guess around 1 or 2%. They were forced to walk on to buses with masks on, but removed them as soon as they sat down. Just as they’d put them on if they had to get into Tesco or wherever.
            Of course the government would have been aware of this, which just makes the idea this would work to stamp out a virus bonkers.
            Our rulers cannot control the flow of drugs in our prisons, but people believed they could control a virus in a nation.

      • Hillary Goldberg Levin
        Hillary Goldberg Levin says:

        Thanks for your response.
        I am 100% certain that organized Jewry has engineered the destruction of every white nation on this earth
        by opening the borders to massive third world immigration. You cannot make me believe that every white country on earth overnight decided to accept MILLIONS of unskilled low IQ non-whites, or that the millions of non-whites spontaneously, all at the very same time, decided to invade every white nation on earth.
        There had to be a hidden hand that influenced the largest migrations in human history.
        The pattern repeated worldwide suggests that globalist JEWS want to destroy borders to install a one world government. It seems quite obvious and there can be no other explanation.

  15. hi fans !
    hi fans ! says:

    It’s called “diversity” (yeah, and not diver-city!).

    “Thoughtful comments about Jews may meet our other standards. However, such comments invariably give rise to vituperative and obsessive comments. Therefore, if you would like to write about Jews, please do so on other platforms.”

    It’s called taboo (“No, it is called cowardice!”).

  16. Lev Goldstick
    Lev Goldstick says:

    A most excellent piece, Rocka. The Aloni quote and the Joel Stein piece are especially haunting.

    If anyone wants to examine such hysteria at the plebeian level, consider checking out the following. I am reading early entries from the now (almost) defunct blog Age of Treason, authored by Tanstaafl. It was around November 2007 when the blogger evolved from an anti-jihadist to a jew-aware White identitarian. The gold can be found in the comments sections, where some of his jewish readers (like Mencius Goldbug) start to see an uncomfortable change in Tan’s tenor and content. The spotlight is now on **them.** Predictably, all the pathologization, invective, and evasiveness you would expect are in full view. No secondary sources needed. One commenter (among dozens) warns that Tan is going to start seeing jews everyhere and ruin every good conversation with his irrational monomania. Tan, who wields a sharp rhetorical machete, swings back:

    “I don’t see jew everywhere, but I don’t see them nowhere either. I see them where they are.”

  17. Susan
    Susan says:

    This is a great example of what RockaBoatus described in his piece : “Biden Administration Riddled With Jew Haters” at

    Jewish writer Joan Swirsky writes of “over thousands of years” a “maniacal Jew hatred and a fanatical loathing of Israel.” She quotes hate crime in American and European cities and concurs that “hatred of Jews is on a significant rise.”

    There is something astounding I could quote in almost every paragraph so interested readers should look it up themselves.

    I had no idea that the Biden administration was so anti-Semitic!

    The site News With Views has a Zionist Christian orientation and most of the writers are Christians, but they are usually far more low-key.

    • ChilledBee
      ChilledBee says:

      The following is a taken from that site regarding the Biden administration. What planet is this lady living on?

      “all of them are Democrats, including a huge number of elected members of the U.S. Congress! We have all witnessed the ferocious Jew hatred and abhorrence of Israel vomited out on a regular basis by the growing number of racist Democrats in the U.S”

  18. hi fans !
    hi fans ! says:

    “The Hitler Youth is not a Boy Scout or Girl Guide organization. It is a compulsory Nazi formation, which has consciously sought to breed hate, treachery, and cruelty into the minds and souls of every German child. It is in the true sense of the word, ‘education for death.’ Under no circumstances should the Hitler Youth be taken lightly.”

  19. Neil
    Neil says:

    In Kabbalah, Tippereth is the sixth sephira, At the centre of the tree on the axis of vertical and horizontal.
    The number six is sacred, representing the Hexagram(The Macrocosm-the great face-god)the star of David.
    Also, It was claimed Jews were turned to soap (And train oil). Why the SS would wash themselves with concentrated Jewish essence is beyond me. It is like a Muslim washing with pig fat!
    Simon Wiesanthal was the author of the soap myth.
    Here is another story about SI Weasel (I will give you a quote to interest you)
    “I said to him, ‘Simon, you are telling a lie,’” Bauer recalled in a Jan. 31 interview. “He said, ‘Sometimes you need to do that to get the results for things you think are essential.’” !!

Comments are closed.