“The Jews — The Kings of Our Age,” by Dr. Otto Böckel

“The Jews — The Kings of Our Age”[1]
Dr. Otto Böckel
Translated by Alexander Jacob

Otto Böckel (1859–1923) was a German anti-Semitic politician who was moved by the plight of the German peasants of Hesse to enter politics in 1887 as an independent member of the Reichstag. Like Eugen Dühring — who published a seminal work on the Jewish Question in 1881, Die Judenfrage[2] — Böckel was against all exploitative groups, Jewish or Junker and championed the peasants against their capitalist oppressors. Like Dühring too, Böckel considered the Jews distinct from the Germans in race rather than in religion and maintained that the Jewish Question was an existential question on which hinged the survival of one or the other race.  In the nineties, he formed an anti-Semitic party called Antisemitische Volkspartei, which later merged with Oswald Zimmerman’s Deutsche Reformpartei, in 1893. However, opposition from other anti-Semitic factions, including that of the Lutheran theologian Adolf Stoecker and his Christlich-soziale Partei, led to a weakening of his parliamentary position and he eventually left politics in 1912.

*   *   *

Respected attendees!

In my last talk, which I held on 28 December of last year here in the Bockbrauerei, I explained that the Jewish Question is an existential question for the German nation, that it was about whether the German nation would remain free, prosperous and happy in the future or whether Jewry would, bit by bit, in a slow but certain progression, undermine our national welfare and therewith the foundational pillars of our national existence. The Jewish Question stands above the political parties; it is a national question which affects every German regardless of religion or party affiliation. Whether conservative, liberal, progressive or ultramontane, all are threatened by the Jews. It was a great mistake of the anti-Semitic movement that it allowed itself to be dragged down to the swamp of parties; the decline of the anti-Semitic movement — so often stressed by the Jews — dates from the day that anti-Semitism got roped in by the Conservatives. This mistake we should rectify today, we must preach anti-Semitism free of any party orientation; every German has an interest in the Jewish Question, and only through the cooperation of men of all parties can it be solved in a legitimate manner.

How a solution of the Jewish Question is to be imagined has been the subject of much debate. Of course, such burning questions are not solved in one stroke. But the way to the solution is, nevertheless, quite discoverable. Every solution of the Jewish Question must begin with the fact that it should be recognised legally in the constitution that:

There are in Germany two different nations: Germans and Jews. The former are the masters of the land, the latter are guests, who may indeed possess a right to hospitality but never a right to be masters.

Who then made Germany arable, who cleared the primeval forests, who drove out the bears and wolves? Did our forefathers, the ancient Germans, not do that? If the Jews had had to cut down the primeval forests and shoot the wolves, the primeval forests would still have been standing in Germany and the wolves would have still dwelt in packs in our forests.

What our people developed through the sweat of their brow should also remain their own and no foreign tribe may drive the German from his native soil. Germany for the Germans, that is the slogan of anti-Semitism. We do not want any hatred of Jews but protection of Germans; never should the property of the Germans be expropriated by Jews, never should entire streets, entire cities and villages fall victim to the Jews, as is the case, for example, in Hesse, Alsace, and even here in Berlin. If the land registers — these silent proofs of Jewish power — could speak, they would utter a loud declaration of the Judaization of German land. The exploitation of our rural people has already reached a fabulous height.

Some examples: In the district courts of Gelnhausen and Meerholz, 227 forced auctions of housing properties were pending from 1 January 1880 to the present date. If one adds to this also the public auctions of the district courts of Wächtersbach, Birstein, Bieber and Orb, there must have been, in the Gelnhausen district alone, in this time-period, the really hair-raising number of 450 public auctions. The prosecuting party consisted 99% of Jews, while 1% was made up of public commercial treasuries and German money-lenders. Furthermore, in the Frankenberg district in Hesse, from 1877 to 1882, in 17 communities, 36 auctions have been noted. Of the auctioneers 17 were Jews and only 3 Germans. In addition, it must be observed that, given such a progress of property butchering, in around 15 years in the Frankenberg district there will be only a very small number of peasants left who are not financial slaves of the Jewish butchering of property. So, we have come so far already in the highly civilized nineteenth century that slavery — which has been repealed in Africa and America with streams of blood — can be quite freely introduced again into the middle of the German fatherland by Jews. Is that not a slap in the face of our much-praised civilization? When will the Germans have some of the tolerance that they have had twelve times for the foreign Jews for their own flesh and blood, for the German peasant class ruined by the Jews?

But do not think that it looks pathetic only In Hesse. It looks more or less similar everywhere in Germany. None other than the officious Norddeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung wrote the following in 1880 about the Jews in Posen:

Just as in a factory, the public auction machine works throughout the year allocating the personal possessions of the rural folk to the Jews.

Yes, such an admission on the part of a newspaper that in its time made a stand against the anti-Semites is doubly valuable. In Upper Silesia, the Jews, according to the report of the liberal Kölnische Zeitung of May 1886, rule the entire trade to such an extent that in some places it is very difficult to do any shopping on Saturdays. The Jews have all the liquor bars in their hands there. Under such circumstances one can well understand that hunger typhus and delirium tremens is rampant in Upper Silesia. The Jews are also to blame for the hunger typhus and the misery that are to be found in Spessart, as Father Frank publicly proclaimed in the Bavarian chamber in 1880. How great the debt has grown in the Saar emerges from the well-established fact that a single Jewish firm, the H. Brothers in Saarlouis, as a consequence of the law “On the sale and mortgaging of property within the Rhine law,” in the period from 1 July 1885 to the present date in 1886, earned over 2,000,000 marks purchase price privileges. Consider, gentlemen, that that was done by a single ordinary Jewish firm, and now calculate the debt of our peasant class in relation to thousands of similar Jewish firms!

In the area around Trier, the Jews have already become exuberant to such an extent that they could openly boast that they were killing the Peasants’ Union founded for the protection of the peasants. In West Prussia, the Jews are, as the Secretary General Dr. Demmler testifies, already prevalent, extraordinarily strong, and have become the “fundamental malady of the peasant class.” Faced with such conditions, who does not recall the saying of Prince Bismarck, who in 1847 said in the state parliament during the discussion of the Jewish emancipation:

I know a place where the Jewish population is very numerous in the country, where there are peasants who call nothing on their entire property their own; from their bed to their oven-fork all furniture belongs to the Jew and the peasant pays a daily rent for every single thing. The corn in the field and in the barn belongs to the Jew and the Jew sells bread, seeds, and fodder to the peasant with razor sharpness. Of a similar Christian usury I have never heard, at least in my experience.

Another example, of how it is in southern Germany. In 1835, the Jews in Hohenzollern petitioned for their civil rights. The provincial deputies deliberated on it. In the course of the debate a speaker expressed the following: “The haggling business of the Jews weighs in a corrupting manner on the province. In the village, in the huts of the poor and the simple folk, the work-instrument and cow, the field and the pasture, the pan and the pot, the hood and the jacket, often belong to the Jew and he does not stop making the peasant with his house and field, harrow and plough, wife and child subject to him through interest.” If the Jews are emancipated, said another speaker, “then in a short time the entire princely house of the Hohenzollerns would belong to the Chosen People and the poor goyim be their slaves.” These are sad images of the Judaization of land in Germany.

Where will it end if it continues in this way? From where will the defense troops come to defend the fatherland when our peasant sinks more and more into a day-labourer or emigrates in order to escape from the Jew? The peasantry are the foundational pillar of a healthy state structure; woe to the state that leaves its peasants defenceless to exploitation by the Jews! It is infuriating when one must watch how the Jew, who just 20 years ago peddled goatskins as a poor panhandler, today, as a rich haggler, holds on a Sunday morning a day of hearing for his indebted peasants in order to inform them whether he will just auction them off or whether he will still be merciful. It is infuriating when such scenes occur in the middle of the German fatherland!

Yes, gentlemen, if you would see how the poor victims of the Jew come to the day of hearing of this person, how they bow down their heads, how the Jew shouts at them, how many of them depart therefrom in tears, then your heart will beat in shame and rage at how deep already the German people have sunk into misery. If you wish to study the Jewish Question, you must go to the court house into which the Jew leads his peasants; how often I have seen the poor victims creep to the local court with lowered head next to the grimacing Jew.

Yes, gentlemen, this sight made me an anti-Semite, I then said to myself: ‘How low, how low indeed, our people have fallen! Is there then nobody, nobody who has the courage to intervene on behalf of the poor people who have fallen to the Jew?’ I looked around myself and saw nobody. Some perhaps made fists in their pockets, but the Jews are too powerful, they are feared. Cowardice is a widespread vice.

Then I jumped into the movement, without any consideration of career or future. It was in autumn 1883 when I became acquainted, in a really drastic case, with the misery that the Jews bring upon our people. A formerly well-off peasant was fully impoverished by a Jew; a few days after the auctioning of the peasant’s possessions, the Jew was found murdered. The peasant was brought before the jury in Marburg but acquitted. The proceedings uncovered a frightful image of Jewish usury. I followed the trial with great excitement; on the day on which the verdict was uttered I too was among the expectant crowd. I shall never forget the moment when the acquitted victim of the Jew emerged from the door of the court building. A hundred “Bravos” shook the air, the mass of people were beside themselves with joy. Then, in this thrilling hour, I swore to myself: “This cannot go on further; you must intervene against the activities of the Jews with your whole life. The people are panting for a liberator:” From this moment onwards I have been an anti-Semitic agitator, the image of the poor peasant robbed by the Jew impels me forward; whether the enemy be numerous, whether the dirt and the hatred be so great, I must fight and will fight to the last drop of my blood, to my last breath.

We want to fight, but only on an honest, legal path; we abjure every brutal violence and dissociate ourselves expressly from anyone who undertakes to solve the Jewish Question in an illegal manner. We know only too well that nothing hurts our cause more than illegal riots. That is precisely what the Jews want so that they may obtain a certain semblance of truth for the old meaningless phrase “Jew baiting.” Who knows how many of those abhorrent riots against the possessions of the Jews originated directly or indirectly from paid agents provocateurs of the Jews themselves. We cannot emphasize too often the legality of our agitation.

Equally as often must we emphasize that we seek to solve the Jewish Question totally only as a racial question, never as a religious question. The Jewish Question has nothing to do with the religion of the Jews; what the Jew believes is a matter of indifference; whether he is a Reform Jew, Orthodox or baptised Jew, that is a matter of complete indifference for us anti-Semites. The Jews are a tenacious, ancient race distant from ours that cannot be extirpated from the world either through baptism or miscegenation. Baptism is for the Jew only a passport to enter into the higher classes in order to be able to work so much more energetically for the interests of his race. Through baptism the Jew becomes only more dangerous.

What the Jews themselves think of baptism they express very openly; so, for example, the Jew Singer in Vienna clearly says in his work Should the Jews become Christians?,[3] “The Jew who lets himself be converted is a hypocrite.” More characteristically does the orthodox Israelit appearing in Mainz illustrate the view of the Jews regarding baptism: At the time of the Napoleonic campaign a German Jew came as a soldier to Spain; now, there are in Spain, where the Jewish religion is not tolerated in public, many secret Jews (they are called novos christianos)[4] who say outwardly that they are Christian but secretly celebrate the Jewish rituals, are circumcised, etc. Our Jewish soldier now came accidentally to such a secret Jew in his cantonment. The host was very ill and was dying. They called for a priest. Suddenly, when the priest entered the barrack room with a raised crucifix, the dying man cried out: “Stay away, I am a Jew.” The priest then threw the cross onto the ground and cried out: “I am also a Jew.”  And the Jewish German soldier embraced both his racial comrades and cried out: “I am also a Jew.” And the three Jews (two dishonest and one honest) embraced one another and were glad that they had found one another in such a miraculous way.

That is a little piece that may show us what one may think of the baptism of the Jews. Woe to the people who think that they can get rid of the Jewish Question through baptism; it can then easily happen as in Portugal, where the entire national character has been corrupted and enervated by the creeping Jewry. The Portuguese, once a warlike and seafaring nation, have, in the judgement of competent travellers like Willkomm,[5] etc., become roguish and Jewish, their national character has been corrupted by the admixed Jewry. How far things have gone in Portugal is demonstrated by an anecdote that the elder D’Israeli, [6] the English Jew, narrates in his work Geist des Judenthums (Stuttgart, 1836, 218): The Portuguese nation is seventy five percent made up of Jews. Under the government of Pombal,[7] King Joseph was persuaded to renew that badge of the Jews, the yellow hat, to designate the many novos christianos among his subjects. The edict was prepared; the next morning the minister appeared before His Majesty with three yellow hats, one he offered to the king, the second he gave the Great Inquisitor and the third he intended for his own head. “I follow the orders of His Majesty,” he said, “and give this badge to those whose blood has been stained with Jewish blood.”

That is what happens in countries where one deals with the Jewish Question from a religious standpoint. The Jews are a race, and indeed a very ancient one. On the Egyptian pyramids we find portrayed, among other labourers, also some Jews (the Jews, as is well-known, had to work as laborers in Egypt) and these Jews on the thousand-year old pyramids look exactly like our present-day Jews in Germany. That is perhaps the best proof of the persistence of the Jewish race.

It is a fact recognised by many medical authorities that the bodily structure of the Jews is different from that of the Germans. Dr. G. Schulz, curator of the anatomical museum in St. Petersburg, compiled a report on the measurements of individuals from different nations for the determination of the proportions of the human body. In St. Petersburg, the focal point of the most extensive monarchy on earth, he had excellent opportunity for comparative bodily measurements: he accurately measured Russians, Jews, Circassians,[8] Latvians, negroes and Chuvashians.[9] The result showed, that among these different nations, the Jews represented not just a deviation and distinctiveness in individual proportions, but that they stand at the extreme limit in the chief proportions of height and width, the proportion of the trunk to the limbs, of the head and neck to the rest of the body, and represented an exceptional distinctiveness. Even Professor Virchow,[10] the famous natural scientific researcher, spoke at the grave of Ludwig Löwe of a Jewish race and therewith provided the most valuable endorsement for us anti-Semites.

The key to the Jewish Question lies in the circumstance that the Jews are a foreign race that thinks differently, feels differently, acts differently than us and consequently must quite naturally be placed in another legal category. We cannot confound the concept of race with “humanity”: blood is not water, nations and statesmen who do not deal with the racial conditions rooted in Nature are destroyed by this failure of understanding.

One such failure of understanding was the Jewish emancipation. People thought that they would be able to silently assume that a Jew was, or could become, a German. Statesmanly cleverness and foresight were subordinated to more general observations and created in this way pathetic conditions which a clever politician could have foreseen. Even the very free-thinking tribune Hecker[11] was an opponent of Jewish emancipation and he called it nonsense! Today we have to suffer badly on account of the mistake of the Jewish emancipation. The consequence of that liberal enthusiasm for the Jews plagues the German nation like a rheumatism and it is high time to take care that it does not become a gout. The number of Jews increases in a really abnormal manner. In 1774, in Berlin, there were altogether 3953 Jews, in 1813 there existed there still only 2825, in 1858 there were already 15,491 and in the census of 1 December 1880, 53,949 Jews were counted, that is, 4.81 percent. Today, in 1886, we may suppose around 60,000. The number of Jews has thus increased roughly seventeen times from 1780 to 1880. Consider that, if the present-day Berlin Jewry increases again seventeen times in a century, this would give, in Berlin alone, for 1980, the total sum of 923,132 Jews, thus almost one million Jews in Berlin in 1980. In Köln there were, according to an article of the liberal Kölner Zeitung, in 1833, 60,000 Germans and 356 Jews; fifty years later, in 1882, the civilian population of Köln amounted to 138,614 Germans and Jews; the Christians thus increased in 50 years around twofold, the Jews around fifteen times. We may calculate further on the basis of these figures. If Köln increases further under the same conditions, its population will amount in 50 years to 300,000 Germans and 80,000 Jews and, 50 years after, to 700,000 Germans and 1,200,000 Jews.

Do you perhaps understand now that the Jewish Question is an existential question for us Germans? The Kölner Volkszeitung recently wrote the following: “I am not an anti-Semite and would gladly let every Jew live; but if the influence of the Jews increases in the same way as in the last ninety years, I don’t know what will become of Köln.”

In Hesse there are cities and towns which have 10–20 percent Jews, for example, Niedenstein (Fritzlar district) with 21.71 percent Jews, Felsberg (Melsungen district) with 17.50 percent Jews, Schlüchtern with 13.98 percent Jews, etc. As striking is the multiplicative capacity of the Jews abroad. Thus the Jewish population of Vienna has, in comparison to the Christian, increased similarly strongly, 7 times in eleven years, and in Prague 8 times. In Bucharest, the Romanian population was represented in terms of births up to 20 percent, the Catholic up to 16 percent, and the Jewish 47 percent.

Parallel to the capacity of physical multiplication of the Jews runs the rapid growth of Jewish wealth. So we have, for example, according to the official tax registers in Frankfurt am Rhein, a city in which, among 150,000 inhabitants there are around 16,000 Jews, altogether 53 Jewish millionaires and only 48 German millionaires.

In the hands of the Jewish millionaires there are 235 million marks, whereas the Germans represent only 88 million. Given such figures, perhaps nobody asks any more, “Where has our money gone?” but “Whence do those Jewish millions come if not from the sweat of the German people?” They were not earned by the sweat of the hands, no Jewish millionaire saved his millions as a manual labourer or acquired them as a peasant with a plough; all this infinite wealth was taken from the mouths of the working German people. Everybody knows about the wealth of Rothschild. Rothschild possesses in Bohemia alone seven times as much land as the entire imperial family. All sixty aristocratic families of Bohemia taken together have only four times as much land in Bohemia as Rothschild alone, and all that only since 37 years ago. If one adds to that the possessions of Rothschild in Lower Austria, Moravia, Silesia, Hungary, etc., and, further, those in France, Germany, Spain, Italy, America, etc., then one must ask oneself: “Are the Jew not the kings of our age?”

The Ferrières Castle in France, which belongs to Rothschild, and excels in splendour and opulence all royal castles in the world, is surrounded by a complex of 100,000 joch, all of which belongs to Rothschild. The entire lands belonging to this single castle of Rothschild are twice as much as the entire land possessions of all the religious orders of all of France. But, apart from Rothschild, there are further, in France, a number of Jewish bankers each of whom possesses more than 50,000 joch of land. Similarly, all the significant vineyards of France belong to Rothschild. Alongside Rothschild, Baron Hirsch, especially, shines in Paris as a financial magnate. This financier became a millionaire especially through the lotteries. The high society of Paris frequent this Croesus. When Baron Hirsch once stood at the top of his famous stairway and saw the counts, princes and marquis climbing up, he said to his son: “Look at all these people, in twenty years they will all be our sons-in-law, or our gatekeepers.”

The wealth of the Jews constantly increases. In Hungary, where not a single Jew possessed land before 1862, half of the Nyitra County belongs to the Jew Popper, and the former owners of this land have mostly emigrated. This Popper, who began as a poor Jew, died as the patron of 54 Catholic churches. Recently, a Jew called Deutsch bought near Fünfkirchen an estate of 200,000 joch. The other big Jews, Königswarter, Wodianer, Springer, Tedesko, etc., have in the 27 years in which they have been allowed to acquire landed property, bought up so much land in Hungary that they have a quarter of the electorate in their lands. In Galicia, 80 percent of the entire land, thus 4/5, belongs to the Jews and only a fifth to the local people. In Romania, 2/3 of the land is in debt to the Jews; the Jews there are just waiting for their emancipation to take possession of the entire land in a short time. So far have they already come, the poor “persecuted Jews.” Informed people claim that the wealth of the Rothschild house is 20,000 million [marks]; at 5 percent interest this produces in interest in one year of 1,000,000,000 guilders, in one day more than 2,500,000 guilders. So, if Rothschild wishes to consume just the interests, he has every day 2,500,000 guilders to spend.

A bureaucrat who has a yearly salary of 1000 florins must therefore live and work 2500 years long if he wished to earn as much salary as the Rothschild house has to consume daily just in interest. The wealth of the Rothschilds grows rapidly. Each of the two Frankfurt Rothschilds has a yearly income of around 10 million; of this each spends 11/2 million and sets aside thus 81/2 million again as capital. Where should such a hoarding of Jewish millions lead? Shouldn’t universal impoverishment be the natural consequence?

The financial power of the Rotschilds is assertive. When, recently, bankrupt Egypt took a loan from Rothschild, 6 great powers had to vouch for bankrupt Egypt; among these powers was also Germany! Out of this Egyptian loan the Rothschild house soon, as may be proven, earned within a short time 6,100,000 marks, thus a net gain of at least 3 million marks. The power of this Jewish international house already makes itself felt in world history. The Parisian Rothschilds are, as is well-known, the closest friends of the Orléans; the Baroness Alphonse de Rothschild held as recently as 2 July 1886 a glamorous dinner in honour of the Duke of Chartres. It is an open secret that the Parisian Rothschild protects the Orléans. But the Orléans are, for Germany, war. But there are Rothschilds not only in Paris, they have seats also in London and Vienna. The imperial Austrian state is in debt to the Rothschild house. Now imagine the political constellations in the case of a war between France and Russia on the one side and Germany and Austria on the other. The result is therefore very simple; the Finanz und Handelsblatt, certainly a competent, non-partisan organ, describes the consequences in this way:

Supposing the case that France were to find that the time had come to declare war against Germany, then it lies in the powerful hands of the Rothschilds to drive the Austrian state allied with us immediately into bankruptcy and to destroy it financially if it did not comply with the political dictates of the Rothschilds. Nothing else is required for such a catastrophe than to quickly place on the market the Rothschilds’ possession of Austrian credit stocks, bring them down from 500 to half or less, and add to it a couple of hundred million Austrian and Hungarian annuities. Now imagine the effect of such an operation, which is simple in itself. For, even the unpaid billions in other annuities and other funds, industrial shares, bonds, etc. follow forthwith thereupon, and the howling and the fury of the all-shattering countermine will take care of the rest. This business with these credit shares and their all-powerful influence has already been allowed to go too far. We have already long ago pointed to this quite uniquely forged Rothschild weapon and it is apparent, rather late, to everybody’s eyes upon what a dangerous mine Europe stands and who has the fuse for its ignition in his hands.

Now, who has the fuse in his hands? The Jew Rothschild has in his hands the fuse for the ignition of the mine dug under the ground of Europe by the stock-exchange Jews!

Yes, gentlemen, that is how serious the Jewish Question is. These innocent persecuted Jews vilely hounded by us anti-Semites, they rule world-history, they have the fate of entire nations already in their hands. Is it not touching when these Jews who have entire states in their hands play out the old farce of Tolerance against anti-Semitism? We poor anti-Semites “hound” the Jewish people, to whom it is a matter of indifference to smash entire states through stock-exchange manoeuvres. If it should come to war with France and Russia and Germany is isolated through the Rothschilds’ maneuver and squeezed between two buffers, then we will indeed see if the Berlin stock-exchange Jews will be as patriotic as in 1870 when they received the North German war loan with contemptuous laughter. Then perhaps the damage that the Jewish foundations have effected on our national well-being will make itself felt and only then will the German people notice what a hole the Jewish butchers have made in their defensive power.

In 1862, the French Jew Crémieux[12] — the same man who set a price on the head of the German Kaiser in 1870 and whose death was honoured by the Jews of Berlin in the big synagogue — issued an appeal for the founding of the Alliance Israélite.[13] In this appeal it says:

Our nationality is the religion of our fathers; we recognize no other.
The Jewish doctrine must one day fill the entire world.
The work is great and sacred, success is certain.
Catholicism, our hundred-year old enemy, is defeated, struck on the head.
The net that Israel throws over the earth will extend every day and the sublime prophecies of our holy books will be fulfilled.
The day approaches when Jerusalem will become the house of prayer for our united peoples, where the flag of Jewish monotheism blows on the most distance coasts.
Let us use all opportunities. Our power is great, let us learn to use it. What do we have to fear? The day is not far off when the wealth of the earth will belong exclusively to the Jews.

This Jewish union, which was founded with this appeal, numbers today 30,000 members, it has at its disposal every year over hundred thousand marks. Here in Berlin walk thousands of members of that union that seeks to use every opportunity. Yes, we have thrown out the Jesuits, but the Jewish Jesuits, who are thousand times worse, they grow and prosper among us like sands on the shore. Where should that lead to if a stop is not put to it finally? If I go through the most populated streets of Berlin, for example, Friedrichstraße, Leipzigstraße, etc., where almost 90% of all houses have fallen to the Jews, if I see entire stretches of land and villages in the province in bondage to the Jews, if I glance at our influential press, our literature, under the Jewish influence, if I see our grammar schools overflowing with Jews, if I consider the enormous influence of Jewish money on the stock-exchange, I can say only one thing: Germany is to be saved from the Jews either today or never. Consider, Germans, that you stand in the eleventh hour; confronted with the Jewish Question, all party discord must cease. Men of all parties must coalesce into a large German national party, as we have done in Hesse, especially in order to enter parliament.

In parliament, the Jewish Question must be discussed repeatedly until the German people learn to view the repeal of the Jewish emancipation no longer as “intolerance,” as “persecution delirium,” but as a pressing necessity for our own rescue. We in Hesse will show the way, in the parliamentary elections of autumn 1887 we will place pure and genuine anti-Semites in seven electoral districts. We must, and shall, break through in some districts. Support us in Berlin in this difficult battle for the whole of Germany. When we have won in Hesse, then the liberation of Berlin from the Jewish yoke will follow. In conclusion, let me shout out to you the assurance that we will not falter in Hesse and will hold the flag high. You too must stand united in Berlin, our cause is not yet lost, just be united, united, united!

[1] Talk held at the public meeting of the German Anti-Semitic Union in the Bockbrauerei, Berlin, on 4 October 1886.

[2] See my English edition of this work, Eugen Dühring, The Jewish Question as a racial, moral and cultural question, with a world-historical answer, London: Ostara Publications, 2017.

[3] Isidore Singer, Sollen die Juden Christen werden? (Hansebooks, 2016; orig. pub.: 1884). [All footnotes are by the translator.]

[4] New Christians

[5] Heinz Moritz Willkomm (1821–1895) was a German botanist who wrote a work on his travels in Iberia, Zwei Jahre in Spanien und Portugal, 1847.

[6] Isaac D’Israeli (1766–1848) was a writer and father of Benjamin Disraeli. His book Genius of Judaism was published in 1833.

[7] Sebastião José de Carvalho e Melo, Marquis of Pombal (1699–1782) was a Portuguese liberal statesman who served as the powerful chief minister of King Joseph I.

[8] People of the region of Circassia, in the North Caucasus.

[9] A Turkic ethnic group of Russia.

[10] Rudolf Virchow (1821–1902) was a celebrated German physician and pathologist.

[11] Friedrich Hecker (1811–1881) was a German lawyer and one of the principal Liberal agitators during the 1848 Revolution.

[12] Adolphe Crémieux (1796–1880) was a French Jewish lawyer and politician who served as Minister of Justice during the Second Republic and the Third Republic. He was a Freemason and fervent defender of the Jews. He served as president of the Alliance Israélite Universelle from 1863 to 1867 and from 1868 to 1880.

[13] The Alliance Israélite Universelle was established in Paris in 1860 as an international organization for the promotion of the rights and welfare of Jews around the world.

21 replies
  1. Pip
    Pip says:

    The following is an article written by an American Jew in 1928:
    By Marcus Eli Ravage
    Reprinted from The Century Magazine January 1928

    Once you have understood this essay, you can study THIS essay and see that the Jew was telling the truth:

    We often hear people say,
    “If only Jews would return to the Law of Moses!
    “Instead, they follow their secular, atheistic, and Zionist ways!”
    NUMBERS 31:13-18:
    (13) Moses, Eleazar the priest, and all the leaders of the community went to meet them outside the camp.
    (14) But Moses was furious with all the generals and captains who had returned from the battle.
    (15) “Why have you let all the women live?” he demanded.
    (16) “These are the very ones who followed Balaam’s advice and caused the people of Israel to rebel against the Lord at Mount Peor. They are the ones who caused the plague to strike the Lord’s people.
    (17) So kill all the boys and all the women who have had intercourse with a man.
    ( 18 ) Only the young girls who are virgins may live; you may keep them for yourselves.

    The rest of Chapter 31 is concerned with distributing the Midianite plunder. Thirty-two thousand (32,000) virgin girls were counted in the booty (Verse 35). Thirty-two of these were given to “the Lord.” That is, 32 of these little girls were set aside for the Levities (heave offerings), to be used as concubines (Verses 40 and 41).

    Yes, Numbers 31 says what it says.
    The Babylonian Talmud sages used Numbers 31 to justify having sex with children. And since the Talmud sages, along with Christians, regard the Old Testament as “the word of God,” why beat up on the Talmud sages? Why not beat up on Jehovah and Moses, who set the standards?

    For further discussion of Jewish teachings on sex with children, see the Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Yebamoth 60b, Soncino 1961 Edition, page 402. Discussion and links at

    For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.
    Matthew 5:18

    “Do not think that I will accuse you before the Father. Your accuser is Moses, in whom you have put your hope. 46 If you had believed Moses, you would believe Me, because he wrote about Me. 47But since you do not believe what he wrote, how will you believe what I say?”…
    John 5:45 47

    The Old Testament contains hundreds of prophecies about the Messiah; where he would be born, his lineage, what he would accomplish, how he would die. We also know that he would be a king like David (Jeremiah 23:5-6), a priest like Melchizedek (Psalms 110:4) and a prophet like Moses (Deuteronomy 18: 15-19).
    This article is about what it means for Jesus to be a ‘Prophet like Moses’.
    What did Moses Say about Jesus?
    Moses is one of the most revered figures in Judaism as he is the one that God chose to give the Torah (Law) to at Mount Sinai. The “Torah” is the first five books in what Christians call the Old Testament – Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy.
    “To believe Moses” means to believe what he wrote.
    Jesus said to the Jews that did not believe in him that if they really believed Moses, they would believe him;
    “For if you believed Moses, you would believe me, because he wrote about me. But if you don’t believe his writings, how will you believe my words?” (John 5:46).
    The Old Testament is so full of references to Jesus that He taught the disciples about Himself from the Law of Moses and from the Prophets on the road to Emmaus;
    “He said to them, “How unwise and slow you are to believe in your hearts all that the prophets have spoken! Didn’t the Messiah have to suffer these things and enter into His glory?” Then beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, He interpreted for them the things concerning Himself in all the Scriptures.” (Luke 24:25-27)
    Moses said that God would send a prophet like himself and that we must listen to him — in fact says that if we don’t listen, God will hold us accountable;
    “The Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among your own brothers. You must listen to him.
    This is what you requested from the Lord your God at Horeb on the day of the assembly when you said, ‘Let us not continue to hear the voice of the Lord our God or see this great fire any longer, so that we will not die!’ Then the Lord said to me, ‘They have spoken well.
    I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their brothers. I will put My words in his mouth, and he will tell them everything I command him. I will hold accountable whoever does not listen to My words that he speaks in My name. (Deuteronomy 18: 15-19)
    Jesus was the Prophet like Moses that God raised up
    There were many parallels between Moses and Jesus; as infants both Moses and Jesus were almost killed by ruler’s edicts and both were protected from harm, both spent their early years in Egypt, both cured lepers (Numbers 12:10-15; Matt. 8:2-3) and both were initially doubted in their roles by their siblings. Moses lifted up the brazen serpent to deliver those that had faith and Jesus was lifted up on the cross to deliver all who would have faith. Moses appointed 70 elders to rule Israel (Num. 11:16-17); Jesus appointed 70 disciples to teach the nations (Luke 10:1, 17). But the most striking comparison between Jesus and Moses was that they were both prophets that taught the Law of God.
    Yes, Jesus like Moses taught the Law — the true meaning and practice of the Law as given by God.
    As a Prophet, he was calling the Jews back to the Law as God gave it, rather than what the Pharisees had made it.

    The Standard of the Prophet
    As a Prophet, Jesus had to meet the same criteria that God set for all prophets; that is
    To uphold what God has said or be put to death.
    This ought not to be overlooked.
    Prophets in the Old Testament were to be put to death if what they said did not come to pass or if what they taught caused the people to stray from the way God had already spoken.
    The standard for a prophet is spelled out in the Law of Moses;
    “If a prophet or someone who has dreams arises among you and proclaims a sign or wonder to you, and that sign or wonder he has promised you comes about, but he says, ‘Let us follow other gods,’ which you have not known, ‘and let us worship them,’ do not listen to that prophet’s words or to that dreamer. For the Lord your God is testing you to know whether you love the Lord your God with all your heart and all your soul. You must follow the Lord your God and fear Him. You must keep His commands and listen to His voice; you must worship Him and remain faithful to Him. That prophet or dreamer must be put to death, because he has urged rebellion against the Lord your God who brought you out of the land of Egypt and redeemed you from the place of slavery, to turn you from the way the Lord your God has commanded you to walk. You must purge the evil from you.” (Deuteronomy 13: 1-5)

    The Teachings of Jesus and the Law
    Some people believe that the teachings of Jesus as recorded in the New Testament teach something different than what is taught in the Law of Moses or that He gave them new meaning or disregarded the Law; even breaking some of its commands. Finally, others would say Jesus fulfilled the Law and therefore the Law is no longer relevant.
    Let’s look at each of those a bit closer;
    1. Some people believe that the teachings of Jesus were very different than what was taught in the Old Testament; that the Old Testament was all about the law and the New Testament is all about grace. This idea is worth an article in itself at very least, but let’s look at this idea in terms of what Deuteronomy 13 says. If Jesus taught something different (e.g. grace) than what God had previously taught (e.g. Law), then He would have been leading us away from keeping God’s commands and this would have made Him a false prophet, deserving of death.
    2. Others say that Jesus gave ‘new meaning‘ to what was taught in the Old Testament but this too would have made Him a false prophet. If Jesus reinterpreted the Law of Moses, He would have been urging us to rebellion against the Lord and His commands and we would have been just to put Him to death.
    3. Still others say that Jesus broke all kinds of commands in the Law of Moses and often cite Him healing on the Sabbath as a common example. Jesus did not follow the “Oral Law” of the Pharisees and thus in their minds would have been viewed as breaking the Sabbath, but nowhere in Scripture are there any instances of Him violating any of the commands of the (Written) Law, as recorded in the Law of Moses. Furthermore, if Jesus had indeed broken the Law of Moses — the Law given by God, He would have committed a sin and no longer been the Lamb of God without blemish.
    4. Finally, others say Jesus fulfilled the Law and therefore the Law is no longer relevant. Jesus as the Prophet like Moses was calling the Jews back to a true observance of the Law of which He is the goal (Romans 10:4). Some translations use the word “end” for goal, but the word in Greek [telios] is more clearly understood in the context of Romans 10 as goal. In this context, Paul is referring to the Jews as disregarding the righteousness from God and attempting to establish their own righteousness. Again, this refers to the Pharisees insistence that the observance of “Oral Law” (i.e. ‘the traditions of men’) are equivalent in authority to the Written Law — which is the Law of God. Paul says that they [the Jews] have NOT submitted themselves to God’s righteousness [as embodied in the Law] — of whom Christ is the goal.
    None of the teachings of Jesus recorded anywhere in the New Testament teach something new or different than what is taught in the Law of Moses and at no time does Jesus ever break the commands of the Law, as given by God. In the following examples, we demonstrate that Jesus considered the Law not only relevant to teach, but to exhort believers to practice.

    Jesus upholds the Law
    Here are four examples as to how Jesus, as the Prophet like Moses, upholds the Law of Moses;
    1. Jesus and the Rich Young Man
    The synoptic gospels record the conversation between Jesus and the rich young man who wanted to know how to inherit eternal life.
    Jesus could have simply replied “follow me” but he doesn’t. He reminds the man of the commandments of God in the Law forbidding adultery, murder, stealing, bearing false witness and honouring one’s parents (Mark 10:17-22; Matt 19:16-30; Luke 18:18-30). Jesus upholds the Law.
    It was when the young man said that he had kept these commands from the time he was a youth that Jesus said to sell all he had, distribute it to the poor and follow Him (Luke 18:18-23, Mt 19:19-21, Mark 10:17-21). Jesus continues to uphold the Law in His reply by telling the man to sell all his possessions. He was pointing out that money had become an idol to the man which kept him from keeping the first two commandments; which is to have the Lord as our God and no other gods before Him, and not to make an idol — which money had become to the man. Jesus upholds the Law all the way through this teaching.

    2. Jesus and the Jewish Lawyer
    In the conversation between Jesus and a Jewish lawyer recorded by Mark and Matthew, the issue of which is the greatest of the 613 commandments came up.
    A question had arisen among the Jews and was now put to Jesus as to which commandment was ‘the first of all’ (Mark 12:28), or ‘the greatest’ (Matthew 22:34) — first and greatest both referring to the same thing.
    In Matthew’s and Mark’s account (Mark 12:31, Matthew 22:39), Jesus replies to the Jewish lawyer saying that ‘the greatest and first commandment’ was to love God with all your heart, soul and strength (Deuteronomy 6:5) and adds ‘the second is this, “You shall love your neighbour as yourself” (Leviticus 19:18). Jesus upholds the Law.

    Moderate Christians love to talk about how Jesus fixed the Old Testament, or, in other words, obsoleted the horribly offensive parts about slavery, keeping women in their place, killing gays, etc. In fact, he did no such thing.
    1. Jesus fully supported everything in the Old Testament
    Here is Jesus speaking specifically on the topic of Old Testament teachings:

    “For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass the law until all is accomplished. Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but he who does them and teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” — Matthew 5:18-19
    “It is easier for Heaven and Earth to pass away than for the smallest part of the letter of the law to become invalid.” (Luke 16:17)
    “Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. Amen, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest part or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law, until all things have taken place.” (Matthew 5:17)
    “Did not Moses give you the law, and yet none of you keepeth the law” (John7:19)
    Keep in mind, this is Jesus saying this – in the Bible that all Christians own and cherish. Don’t take my word for it; look it up–it’s all there.
    So now that we understand that he fully supported what’s in the Old Testament, let’s take a look at what he actually just commanded us to uphold.

    Blasphemy is Punishable by Death
    One who blasphemes the name of the LORD shall be put to death; the whole congregation shall stone the blasphemer. Aliens as well as citizens, when they blaspheme the Name, shall be put to death. (NRSV) — Leviticus 24:16

    Cheaters Must Die
    If a man commits adultery with another man’s wife—with the wife of his neighbor—both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death. (NIV) — Leviticus 20:10

    Dishonoring Your Mother or Father is Punishable by Death
    Anyone who dishonors father or mother must be put to death. Such a person is guilty of a capital offense. (NLT) — Leviticus 20:9

    People Who Work on Sabbath Should be Killed
    You have six days each week for your ordinary work, but the seventh day must be a Sabbath day of complete rest, a holy day dedicated to the LORD. Anyone who works on that day must be put to death. (NLT) — Exodus 35:2

    If a Woman is Not a Virgin When She Gets Married, She Has to Die
    “If any man takes a wife, and goes in to her, and detests her, and charges her with shameful conduct, and brings a bad name on her, and says, ‘I took this woman, and when I came to her I found she was not a virgin,’ … and evidences of virginity are not found for the young woman, then they shall bring out the young woman to the door of her father’s house, and the men of her city shall stone her to death with stones … (NKJV) — Deuteronomy 22:13-14,20-21

    There’s Nothing Wrong With Slavery
    Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. (NIV) — Leviticus 25:44

    Sodomites Should be Put to Death
    If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall be put to death; their blood is upon them. (NRSV) — Leviticus 20:13

    Keep in mind, these aren’t suggestions. They’re not optional. Remember what Jesus said,
    “Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven…”
    He also said they’re not open to any personal interpretation. It’s all very clear to anyone willing to actually read the Bible.

    The sooner we go back to our Greek and Roman cultures, the sooner we get rid of this Jewish cultures, that sees the non-Jew as a slave.


    Jacob Schiff proposed that the First World War be the war to end all wars, which became an international mantra after the war. The absolute end of all war heralded the Jewish Messianic Era in which the Jews would be “restored” to Palestine, where they would rule the world from Jerusalem. Jewish bankers deliberately created the First World War in order to artificially fulfill Jewish Messianic prophecy by staging the “Battle of Armageddon”, by creating a World government run by Jews known as “The League of Nations”, by “restoring” the Jews to Palestine, by destroying the Empires and Monarchies, by enslaving the Gentiles with Bolshevism, by placing the wealth of the World in Jewish hands, etc. etc. etc.

    Schiff believed that the First World War fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah 2:1-4, which states,
    “1 The word that Isaiah the son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem. 2 And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the LORD’s house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it. 3 And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem. 4 And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore.”
    “The mashiach [Jewish messiah] will bring about the political and spiritual redemption of the Jewish people by bringing us back to Israel and restoring Jerusalem (Isaiah 11:11-12; Jeremiah 23:8; 30:3; Hosea 3:4-5). He will establish a government in Israel that will be the center of all world government, both for Jews and gentiles (Isaiah 2:2-4; 11:10; 42:1). He will rebuild the Temple and re-establish its worship (Jeremiah 33:18). He will restore the religious court system of Israel and establish Jewish law as the law of the land (Jeremiah 33:15)…The world after the messiah comes is often referred to in Jewish literature as Olam Ha-Ba (oh-LAHM hah-BAH), the World to Come…In the Olam Ha-Ba, the whole world will recognize the Jewish G-d as the only true G-d, and the Jewish religion as the only true religion (Isaiah 2:3; 11:10; Micah 4:2-3; Zechariah 14:9).”
    — From “Mashiach: The Messiah”, Judaism 101 —–

    “The Jewish people as a whole will become its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the “children of Israel” will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.”
    –Baruch Levy, Letter to Karl Marx, ‘La Revue de Paris’, p.574, June 1, 1928

    • Gerry
      Gerry says:

      @ Pip

      Well done and well said. One observation however, is imagine how difficult it must have been for St. Paul as he transferred away from the Jews to the Gentile peoples in proclaiming Christ to them. To a people who had no knowledge of Jewish law and indeed there was no way to even begin to teach such people can you imagine teaching none Jews the commandments of God and then the why of the Crucifixion of his Son? St. Paul even had a terrible encounter with a man from Corinth who had his fathers wife meaning I guess his own mom? What did St. Paul say about that person? Excommunicate him from the Church first of all and then St. Paul had him delivered over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh so that the Spirit could be saved. What does Sin so pollute the person that it takes more than just mercy and forgiveness? It raises many question and I have come to see that Law doesn’t work anyway but we certainly need to know the law because as St. Paul rightly deduced how will one ever know what holiness is if one hasn’t been trained in the Laws of God to begin with? these who teach we are under a new dispensation, a dispensation of grace i often say to them well wasn’t it God’s grace that gave the law in the first place? People before the Code of Hammurabi came along then Moses it was their own conscience that largely determined what was right and wrong as in their conscience accusing them etc. Did Cain know what murder was before he killed Able? It all raises many questions? Need more Dr. Rushdoony?

      Now as for the rest of your piece about the Jewish nation being reborn and ruling the world indeed that is what is promised and will indeed occur. But not as is found currently. those scriptures you cite will find its fulfillment in Christ Jesus when He returns and sets up the millennium kingdom. I’m deeply afraid an error and a terribly grave error it is of Biblical interpretation has occurred the most serious and grievous is this dangerous nonsense that Russia and Germany are the nations of Gog and Magog from Ezekiel 38 and 39. Nothing could be further from the truth and I wrote the only book on the subject that addresses this which i recieved from god Himself by the way!!!!! — Lies, all Lies by Gerry Fox.

      Further to this is the nonsense from the same book Ezekiel about the Valley of Dry Bones coming to life. This is taken to be the rebirth of a nation. Again nothing could be further from the truth. Dead bones coming back to life and a great army is none other than what we see and find in the history and words of Christ Jesus. This analogy in Ezekiel has its literal fulfillment in the resurrection of Christ. How and who and when it became about a nation is just more wrong interpretation.

      I could go on and on about a great many things but a blog makes it difficult and I’m no trained scholar and to tell you the truth after what i have experienced don’t care for them really.

      Hope it helps!!!

      Cheers Pip

      By the way about that banker Sciff you will find this quite pertinent:



  2. Oera Linda
    Oera Linda says:

    Wonderful text akin to similar passages in Two Hundred Years Together and enough to debunk everything Semetic and “humanist”.
    Those cuties fled to the “United” States. Porn. Disney. Federal Reserve. Wars. Immigration. Abortion. Hollywood. Netflix. Pfizer. Monsanto. Big Pharma. Transgenderism

  3. Carolyn Yeager
    Carolyn Yeager says:

    Whew! This article took my breath away. I am left only saying Bravo to Alexander Jacob for translating it and to KMac for publishing it. I will add, it is about time! The suffering of Germans/Germany has been so trampled underfoot by the WWII Jewish-created narrative that EVERYONE dares not challenge. Courage is required, and called for. Without exceptional courage we are certainly lost with no hope of recovery. Just look at all the once-great nations that have been destroyed, racially, by the Jew. None have ever come back to what they once were.

    But do I think “Whites” or European-derived “Christians’ have the necessary courage? No, I do not. Only being honest. So this article reads more like a piece of history than a call to action, or even an encouragement.

  4. Crush Limbraw
    Crush Limbraw says:

    Here’s the ultimate irony – the Old Testament explicitly instructs Israel to forgive all debts every 7 years and release all slaves and return all lands to their original family every 50 years – the year of Jubilee! Usury was prohibited.
    Did Israel practice it? Of course not!
    Why do you suppose God ended His covenant with Israel in 70 AD? All of this is extensively covered by posts in my library – most written by various authors.
    Here’s one fairly current – https://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/2020/02/vox-popoli-necessity-of-debt.html?m=0 – periodic debt cancelation would solve most of our financial problems, but of course that would stop the merry-go-round of the Jews get richer and the rest of us get poorer.

  5. Odessa
    Odessa says:

    Well here we go again. Another great Christian nation The United States of America, has been corrupted by the same grievance industry as Germany has been. We now have 2% of the population sitting in every high up echelon of government, finance, culture (Hollywood and music) education, medicine, technology, pornography, real estate, all channels of information, publishing and I’m sure I’m missing some more but you get my drift. The same tactics are being used by the BLM movement, the homo trans movement, feminism and the Latin La Raza movement, against white Christian males. The very genus of the United States of America was created by Protestant white men. Deep thinkers and astute students of man’s true nature, our founding fathers gave us a document to help us fight back. I think we should not allow one more statue to be torn down, no name changes a mother is a mother not a birthing person, a woman is born with a womb not a penis. White Men are appreciated and loved. Our legal systems and ethics have been contorted to be used against our country. White European men and women built this country, no doubt. We need to push back against the forces of Marxism and the replacement tribal hordes. They are sitting in government and are crossing the borders.

    • bruno
      bruno says:

      Wow, it sounds like many of the tens of thousands of dissertations and studies printed on the topic in Slavic languages. Seems like many of the books by retired professor Henryk Pajak. According to him, the Zs have many of the Western elite by the balls.

      I once read that the German parliament, the Reichstag, was the same as Warsaw’s Sejm, or Washington’s Congress. It’s so confusing. It’s as if many of the elite were bribed by Zs.

      Reminds one of Ukraine’s ruling class and it’s southern connection. At least we have a free press as noticed by TelAvivza’s info on Western idol Zielinsky. How much of the 50 billion gift by Uncle Joe will be skimmed off the top? The conflict in Ukraine reminds one of the danger we faced when Saddam Hitler was thinking of bringing in a nuke in a suitcase. At least the info about that aluminum aircraft that caused the twin towers to go down and building 11 to fold like a pancake was honest.

      Yeah, your right. Now we have a gay military force. We also have Disney, Netflix and Hollywood. Look at all the one powerful nations that have fallen. Remember Cicero of the Roman parliament and his remarks on this topic. One of the many fascinating aspects of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, of about a mln sq miles, was the Zs transferring their money to Prussia before the partitions. How about the Russian infighting of 1905, 1917 or the “Ruski” oligarch setup of the 1990s? Some actually allege that those were similar to the neoKonski regime of King Bush II or Uncle Joe’s entourage.

      There was once an intellectual, diplomat and author by the name of Tadeusz Walichnowski. He was a real sharp cookie. He figured he could elicit information pertaining to a very delicate transnational subject. He just wanted to show the verboten side of a coin. He fought for open communique. Consequently, during a Middle East conflict, because Moscow was the rival of Washington, he figured he could write about certain elements in the West. He picked La Cesspool Grande and her satellite government in Bonn. Well, he wrote a book on the topic. After that, he was intellectually castrated and in academia everyone became afraid of him. In the end, as a once very influential fellow he lost his numerous contacts in media. He even faced legal adjudication under various bogus allegations. He was completely broken and no longer was able to teach and universities will be part of the diplomatic corps. One often pondered that, since he knew the score about transnational networking, why he didn’t commit to more appropriate diplomacy and utilize stronger disclaimers. Why didn’t he, for example, ask questions about why such and such had such clout…

      America is so huge. Is it possible that she could change demographically and eventually vanish like say Prussia? Perhaps Uncle Joe and his Western KGB-type entity has the answers. Ah, if only free speech was…

    • Birhan Dargey
      Birhan Dargey says:

      In my home country where as usual in teh world JEWS dominate banking/financing from A LOT help from their friends international jewry. Well in my country The National Treasury Dept. found that jews were charging ILLEGALY exorbitant interests in violation of their original contracts. The jews were charging% on the original amount of the LOAN/DEBT eventhought the poor dumb “gentile” farmers/workers had been paying% on the principal+debt. The jew banker had placed illegal charges: life/insurance, debt/insurance, ATMfees even if no ATM was issued, .. Sometimes the gentile borrower wanted to pay the Loan..they refuse to take payment…they applied earaly payments fees. When the lender was late..the jew applied late fees, and began to charge% as if the LOAN had been issued all over again/renew. IF the lender own LAND/Luxury assets, the JEW refuse to apply late fees and forced the borrower into land/mortgagae foreclosure..I found it ridicolous that the LOAN$$ had been indexed for the LIBOR Market rate as calculated by the UK/England Banking authority…which had NOTHING to do with local Financial/Lending contractual LAWS. The local TAX/Fiscal/treasury Authorities found many jewish lending institutions operating without proper license/no legal resgitration/ and often times OWE huge amounts in UNreported/UNpaidTAXES.Even when they LOSE a legal case they wowuld appeal/appeal dragging the payments for years/decades hoping that the gentile borower would DIE. JEWS woul justify such ILLEGAL/UNethical/INmoral behavior on their religious Talmudic believes.

  6. ariadna
    ariadna says:

    “‘How low, how low indeed, our people have fallen!” He, of course, had no idea how much deeper the descent was going to be.
    Does any nation alone have a chance against a global (multi-national”) power? Not without support from and coordination with an equally global union, which is not on the horizon.

    • Poupon Marx
      Poupon Marx says:

      Russia has more than a chance to dominate the West, or partition Ukraine. It is unstoppable. “Bring it on home”.


      As you stated, Ariadna, Russia is united against external and internal threats to its culture, heritage, values, norms, and traditions. That’s what makes it invincible. V. Putin has a +80% approval rating. The people recognize and unite to defend the Fatherland. To the last man. In fact, the Russian leadership will launch the doomsday MIRV nuke before they would ever concede defeat. I have invested some time in studying the nuclear deterrence of Russia, and it is so advanced as to be unstoppable. Any overwhelming of the Russian territorial integrity would bring China into the war against the West. At that point the hostilities would be over, the West totally destroyed in the mode of Dresden, Germany, at the close of WWII. Over in well under a month. The entire Air Forces and Navies destroyed, all power generation dead due to direct hits and EMP radiation.

      To argue to the contrary, would require investment in research and documentation as I have done, with references. A great way to spend one’s vacation time.

  7. Frederick Ford
    Frederick Ford says:

    The Jews only won because of their age-old tactic of deception. The Jews have used moral deception by building the ideas of the Enlightenment of universal morality, enforcing a particular moral narrative, and maintaining that narrative through educational institutions, work and production, and good old media.

    But like any deception; these lies can be destroyed by understanding the true, unbias reality of morality down to the simplest concepts and this understanding is here.


    and for White people; here is a sensible reason, in sections 1-4 of this article, why White people should stay away from non-White or Black/Brown people.


  8. todd hupp
    todd hupp says:

    Sounds like the current USA:media,finance,academia,government.even elections(Zukerberg, Soros) and climate/anti fossil (Bloomberg)

  9. Herman
    Herman says:

    This essay covered mainly the financial and power aspects of Jews in Germany.

    I am wondering if, as in America today, the Jews of Germany pushed social liberalism and unfettered immigration too.

    Were Jews in Germany back then able to buy German politicians? I would think so, just as here in America.

    In terms of immigration,Turks and Muslims have been invited into Germany by the millions and have gained a measure of political power.

    I wonder how many Americans and pro-Germans know this and realize the implications.

  10. Zimriel
    Zimriel says:

    Request: I find “hunger-typhus” noted in an 1848 “Report on the Typhus Epidemic in Upper Silesia” by Rudolf Carl Virchow, MD. It seems to be a local term not common in German; it is wholly obscure to me. Can we have another footnote explaining this to us?

  11. Bobby
    Bobby says:

    Happy 4th of July everyone. And I guess it would be a happy 4th of ‘Jewlie’ to all of the normies out there.

    Thank you Kevin for posting and Alexander for the work on this great piece.

    Whenever I read literature such as this from Prussia/Germany, 19th, 20th century, it just always floors me. If only the names and locations were changed to present day America, so many of these writings, what Goebells wrote, Hitler’s speeches and what he wrote, what this man wrote, are spot on, spot, on. It’s absolutely fascinating.

    “Yes, gentlemen, this sight made me an anti-Semite, I then said to myself: ‘How low, how low indeed, our people have fallen! Is there then nobody, nobody who has the courage to intervene on behalf of the poor people who have fallen to the Jew?’ I looked around myself and saw nobody. Some perhaps made fists in their pockets, but the Jews are too powerful, they are feared. Cowardice is a widespread vice.”

    I looked up Bockel on Wikipedia and it says that he died in obscurity and destitute. But he didn’t. He still gives many, by what he wrote, confidence, strength, and knowledge that we all must, keep up the good fight.

  12. Birhan Dargey
    Birhan Dargey says:

    Recently the Occidental Observer published an Article about foreign ELITE/jews overwhelming the local domestic ANGLO/Christsian/WASP elite. Much earlier tha that article I had made a comment/s in thisi section asking myself weather am Anglo/Gentile elite/s could ever (win) overcome/ a Jewish elite. My answer is NO..because while gentile/anglo saxons come from a Western/Ethical/Christian/Constitutional paradigms they could never win over a Jewish elite/s that answer and only answer to their Jewish/Torah/Talmudic/Cabbala ethical/moral/legal paradigms. Traditional WASP/puritan elites in the USA came from a Christian self dtermine/law and order ethics that had evolved from the works of Adam Smith, Locke, Schumpeter…emphazising individualism/selfdtermination/democratic/egalitarian/ societies. This values can never win against a JEWISH paradigms that tells them jews 24/7 since birth that is is ethical/just/moral to LIE/cheat/lie/raped/deceive/rob/fraud/steal/even KILL the goyim. So while a Gentile farmer/worker/entreprenur quickly expects the LEGAL/courts system to address remedies and UPhold the laws/contracts..JEWS have completely hate/disregard for gentile laws in fact they control it. distorted, altered them and evnetually replace them with Talmudic laws..SO a plain farmer/worker may understand making a loan and paying interests..BUT the jew will deceive with compound interests/fees/latefees/originating fees/varible compound interests/legalfees/..and IF the prevailing ECONOMIC financial conditiosn favored the gentile borrower then the jew comes up with NEW contract terms like compund interests indexed for inflation/oilprices/foodprices/lohistical costs..whata do all these terms mean? well FRAUD..stealing/lying/…Paradoxically the JEWISH lenders would REFUSE to pay their prescribed just legal TAXES..and the jews will arguee that they are being persecuted/prosecuted/descriminated/..by the King/Zar/govt/Local Treasury…anything and everything to Defraud the Public treasury..Such the cases in UK/Russia/Spain/Portugal/France/Germany JEWS refused to OBEY the laws..FISCAL/Treasury laws and cried ANTIsemitism…

    • inspector general
      inspector general says:

      The career of Joseph Stalin shows a remarkable overcoming (not complete; but quite impressive overall) of Jewish Supremacism in Russia between 1917 and 1953.

  13. Stonewall L. Jackson
    Stonewall L. Jackson says:

    The Jews cannot be defeated without first outlawing their Christian religion and its poisonous morality. The Germans didn’t understand that, and that’s why they lost. Look at history and you’ll clearly see that the only two empires that ever defeated Jews, Rome and the Kiev Rus, were pagan.

  14. marcus baskett (case)
    marcus baskett (case) says:

    Interesting. I’ll certainly try. I’m not Jewish and I believe we took our country back from the subversive carpet bagging “left” when we voted in our leader President Donald Trump (good bad or indifferent, he was OUR vote and OUR power re centering… ie not another installment by the dishonest opposition) As well I also believe the leftist deep state amoeboid human extinction apparatus (probably centers at Israel) defeated and usurped our leadership throne in an illegal deceptive violent and terroristic method stealing back again our cultural political leadership point of reference switching it out for smeared murky uncultured. I’m not 100% certain this page isn’t controlled by the enemy but it doesn’t really matter at this point does it…

Comments are closed.