I was too optimistic. Far too optimistic. I should have remembered what Jonathan Swift (1667–1745) wrote centuries ago: “When a true genius appears in the world you may know him by this sign; that the dunces are all in confederacy against him.” And there was certainly a confederacy of dunces against the highly intelligent and innovative Dominic Cummings, who tried to turn British politics into a powerhouse of physicists and mathematicians, not a monkey-house of “Oxbridge humanities graduates.”
Confronted by a confederacy of dunces: Dominic Cummings and his crammed cranium
I was hoping that Cummings would face down the hatred of incompetent government officials and leftist journalists, who damned him as the “evil genius” behind the successful campaign for Brexit. And yes, he might well have survived their spiteful scheming and remained as chief aide to the British prime minister Boris Johnson. What he didn’t survive was the hatred and scheming of the intellectually vacuous but psychologically formidable Carrie Johnson, the PM’s wife. Cummings was forced out of government in autumn 2020. But he hasn’t gone quietly. He saw Boris Johnson close-up for a long time and wasn’t impressed by what he saw. Now he calls Johnson a “sociopathic narcissist” and tells very disturbing stories like this:
I spent a lot of time in 2020 trying to push changes across ‘national security’ issues. I also went around some of the deep state sites to talk to people engaged in operations and try to figure out what important things were being starved of money/focus because of the general MoD [Ministry of Defence] horrorshow (leaked by a minister at the time to cause trouble). For example, I found our special forces are deprived of tiny amounts of money for crucial things — literally often so tiny you’re talking THOUSANDS, not even millions, while the MoD blows BILLIONS.
I spent time in the no-phones room under No10 discussing nuclear wargames and the UK nuclear enterprise.
In autumn 2020, I forced the PM to carve out 3 hours to discuss the nuclear enterprise. I had wanted to have a whole weekend at Chequers, including sessions with outside specialists, but he balked at just a few hours. After sort of listening, including to an account of rotten infrastructure and the truly horrific bills amounting to many tens of billions we face in coming years because of 25 years of rot and shockingly bad procurement under both parties, we left the room.
He picked up his phone (left outside for security), turned to me angr[il]y, and spat out.
What a waste of my time.
This sums up a lot not just about him but about our political system. Their single most important job is not seen as a priority! (Dominic Cummings’ Substack, “‘People, ideas, machines’ II: catastrophic thinking on nuclear weapons,” 18th March 2022)
Boris Johnson is a nuclear buffoon — a buffoon with his hand on the nuclear button. And the story is even more disturbing today, when the Jewish neo-cons running American and British foreign policy are poking the Russian bear with ever-sharper sticks at ever-shrinking intervals. But in one sense Johnson was right and Cummings was wrong. It was a waste of Johnson’s time to learn more about how to avoid a catastrophic nuclear war. And the “single most important job” of our political system isn’t protecting the population from natural or technological disaster and the collapse of industrial civilization.
Grovelling goys in British politics: (clockwise from top) Sajid Javid, Boris Johnson, Priti Patel at Conservative Friends of Israel
Instead, Johnson’s time is far better spent placating the rich and powerful Jews who put him into office and ensure that he stays there. Similarly, the most important job of our political system is serving the interests of those Jews. Cummings saw those toxic truths of Jewish control again and again during his time in government. He knows all about Jewish power and the way it corrupts Western politics. He knows that Jews select their political servants for compliance, not for competence. And he knows that this is why the prime minister of Britain is a sociopathic narcissist and the president of America is a corrupt, senile narcissist. But Cummings has never discussed any of that. He has always carefully avoided the topics of Jewish power, in particular, and of race, in general.
Cancelled for crimethink
Sadly, he’s right to avoid those topics. If he’d spoken the truth about them while he was in government, he would’ve been driven out immediately. If he spoke the truth about them now, he would lose what influence he still has. But we can be sure that he knows the truth, because while he was in government, he employed a highly intelligent young White male called Andrew Sabisky. Unlike Cummings, Sabisky hadn’t kept quiet on the topic of race. And he paid the price for telling the truth: in April 2020, he resigned as an adviser to the British government after what the Guardian described as “fierce criticism across [the] political spectrum.”
In fact, Sabisky was criticized only by leftists and their cuckservative allies, but the Guardian has always preferred fantasy to reality and will always misrepresent reality when it can. That’s why it was so horrified by Sabisky’s ideas: “In one post from 2014, he suggested that politicians should pay attention to ‘very real racial differences in intelligence’ when designing the immigration system, and another from that year suggested black people on average have lower IQs than white people.” Sabisky also supported eugenics and other attempts to improve the intelligence, health and behavior of the human race.
That was crimethink. But Cummings didn’t condemn Sabisky for it and didn’t want to lose him as an adviser. Indeed, it’s certain that other people in Cummings’ government-team shared Sabisky’s heretical views. Those other crimethinkers were simply more discreet, that’s all. And this is Cummings himself obliquely expressing his disdain for Black Lives Matter (BLM) and other forms of pro-Black, anti-White agitation:
People in SW1 [the London postcode where British government is based] talk a lot about ‘diversity’ but they rarely mean ‘true cognitive diversity’. They are usually babbling about ‘gender identity diversity blah blah’. What SW1 needs is not more drivel about ‘identity’ and ‘diversity’ from Oxbridge humanities graduates but more genuine cognitive diversity.
We need some true wild cards, artists, people who never went to university and fought their way out of an appalling hell hole, weirdos from William Gibson novels like that girl hired by Bigend as a brand ‘diviner’ who feels sick at the sight of Tommy Hilfiger or that Chinese-Cuban free runner from a crime family hired by the KGB. If you want to figure out what characters around Putin might do, or how international criminal gangs might exploit holes in our border security, you don’t want more Oxbridge English graduates who chat about Lacan at dinner parties with TV producers and spread fake news about fake news. (Dominic Cummings’ Substack, “Snippets,” 7th March 2022)
In other words, Cummings thinks that anti-racism is “drivel.” He wants much more reality in politics and much less rhetoric. That’s why he employed physicists who knew about lambda rather than “Oxbridge English graduates” who knew about Lacan. He wanted to make Britain a beacon of efficient government and technological innovation. But in a sense, he was merely trying to fit faster engines to the Titanic. Thanks to mass immigration from the Third World, Britain is steaming straight for a giant iceberg of societal collapse and civil war. So are America, France, Sweden and all other racially and religiously enriched Western societies. And it’s too late to stop all those ships of state colliding with all those icebergs.
Unless a nuclear war intervenes, of course. And with Jewish neo-cons so thirsty for revenge on Russia, nuclear war is once again a very serious threat to the world. We were lucky to survive the Cold War, the last period of prolonged hostility between nuclear-armed Russia and the nuclear-armed West. And far more people should recognize how lucky we were that the Cold War didn’t turn into a Hot War. Unlike Dominic Cummings, the humanities graduates in government don’t know about heroes like Stanislav Petrov and Vasily Arkhipov. And who were they? They were, in effect, complete nobodies who saved the human race by refusing to allow the Russian military to launch nuclear weapons in response to false alarms. Petrov saved the human race in 1983, but he was able to do only because Arkhipov had saved the human race in 1962.
Jewish control may lead to nuclear catastrophe (image courtesy Wikipedia)
We got lucky. Very lucky. Indeed, so lucky that I wonder whether the hair-raising stories of Stanislav Petrov and Vasily Arkhipov count as evidence for quantum immortality, the strange and disturbing concept raised in a famous thought experiment in physics. Some physicists have hypothesized that the universe is continually spawning an infinite number of new universes, each of which spawns new universes in its turn. The human race exists in an infinite subset of those universes — and ceases to exist in an infinite subset of the subset. Perhaps nuclear extinction during the Cold War was probable or even almost certain. The universe I’m writing in just happens to be one of the lucky ones that got through. That’s quantum immortality: if there are infinite copies of any individual in the multiverse, some of those copies will always survive. So I’m immortal, you’re immortal and everyone else is immortal.
I find that a fascinating idea, but it doesn’t comfort me as I contemplate the Jewish fanatics trying to foment a war with Russia. Perhaps there are an infinite number of universes or perhaps there’s just the one. All I know for sure is that the universe I’m in has a nuclear buffoon as British prime minister and governments of grovelling goys all across the West. Jewish power has never been a good thing but now it threatens the survival of the human race. I think Dominic Cummings knows that too and I hope he’s right to keep quiet about it. But in the end the dominance of Dominic wouldn’t be a good thing. Cummings is interested in performance; his leftist enemies are interested in power. None of them are interested in truth, beauty and goodness. Technocracy, even in its genuine and positive sense, isn’t the cure for the pathologies of the West.